[🇵🇰] Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan:

[Ghazi52]

Source : https://www.dawn.com/news/1861249/8-terrorists-killed-during-ibo-in-north-waziristan-ispr

Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan​

Iftikhar Shirazi
September 26, 2024

Weapons and ammunition recovered from the terrorist after the IBO. — Photo provided by the author

Eight terrorists were killed after security forces conducted an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in the North Waziristan district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the military’s media affairs wing said on Thursday.

According to a press release issued by Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the operation was conducted last night on the “reported presence of terrorists in the area”.

The press release said that an intense exchange of fire took place between the security forces and Khawarij during the operation and, as a result, eight terrorists were “sent to hell”.

While it wasn’t mentioned in the statement which terrorist group was involved in the attack, in July, the government, through an official notification, designated the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as Fitna al Khawarij, while mandating all institutions to use the term khariji (outcast) when referring to the perpetrators of terrorist attacks on Pakistan.

Director General ISPR Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry had confirmed the same a month later.

“Weapons and ammunition were also recovered from the deceased terrorist, who remained actively involved in terrorist activities against security forces and targeted innocent civilians as well, the ISPR statement said in its press release today.

“Sanitisation of the area is being carried out to eliminate any other Kharji found in the area as security forces are determined to wipe out the menace of terrorism from the country,” it added.

Meanwhile, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi paid tribute to the security forces for killing terrorists.

According to a post on the interior ministry’s X account, Naqvi said that the security forces took timely action to eliminate the terrorists.

“Salute to the brave soldiers of the security force,” he said.

Pakistan has lately witnessed a sharp uptick in the number of attacks targeting security forces, other law enforcement agencies, and security checkpoints, particularly in Balochistan and KP.

Attacks escalated after the TTP broke a fragile ceasefire agreement with the government in 2022 and vowed to target security forces.

In August, three soldiers were martyred and five terrorists were killed after security forces foiled an infiltration attempt at the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in the province’s Bajaur district.

On September 6, four terrorists were killed when they tried to attack the Frontier Corps headquarters in KP’s Mohmand district.

On September 20, six soldiers were martyred while 12 terrorists were killed during two encounters in North and South Waziristan districts.

 

[Lulldapull]

This KPK terror is completely out of control. We have a serious ethno-facist problem in FATA and it is not going away. Now its not even a jihadi issue anymore. Just pure hate fest.

How do you counter hateful terrorists now?

Used to be jihadist terrorists but now they are full on racist ethno-facist terrorists.

 

[steppeWolff]

Forever war, thanks to stupid establishment policies.

 

[Vsdoc]

Forever war, thanks to stupid establishment policies.

Stand with your brothers. And fight to secede and join Iran.

 

[Vsdoc]

Iran and India will stand with you.

 

[steppeWolff]

Stand with your brothers. And fight to secede and join Iran.

Doc, please dont insult me by calling that scum my "brothers".

We are loyal to the "sabz hilali parcham". It's here to stay, just like these constant wars. Curse of the land.

 

[Vsdoc]

Doc, please dont insult me by calling that scum my "brothers".

We are loyal to the "sabz hilali parcham". It's here to stay, just like these constant wars. Curse of the land.

Iranis are scum?

Why man?

 

[steppeWolff]

Iranis are scum?

Why man?

Current Persian political and military apparatus is.

People would hate me for it, but the Iran under Pehalvi dynasty was much much better in every sense.

Right now its a rabid mullah regime hell bent on getting its people killed and poking its neighbours due to a mix of their incompetence, religious fervourism and martyr syndrome.

 

[Egyptian]

@Sharma Ji @Krishna with Flute @Vsdoc

 

[Vsdoc]

Current Persian political and military apparatus is.

People would hate me for it, but the Iran under Pehalvi dynasty was much much better in every sense.

Right now its a rabid mullah regime hell bent on getting its people killed and poking its neighbours due to a mix of their incompetence, religious fervourism and martyr syndrome.

Really surprised to hear a Muslim Pakistani say that.

 

[steppeWolff]

Really surprised to hear a Muslim Pakistani say that.

Doc, I believe in judging regimes based on their actions, not just their religious or ideological labels. The Pehlavi era had its flaws, but under it, Iran was a stable, and rapidly modernizing nation with strong global ties. Today, the IRI’s policies whether crushing dissent at home, fueling conflicts abroad, or mismanaging the economy have brought immense suffering to ordinary Iranians.

My criticism isn’t about religion; it’s about the regime’s oppressive governance and reckless foreign policy. And let’s be honest whatever limited support Pakistan maintains for Iran is purely out of strategic necessity, not admiration. Since the Revolution, Iran has been hostile to Pakistan, whether through backing Baloch insurgents, fueling violence in Karachi in the 1990s, or cozying up to India at our expense. Many Pakistanis see this clearly, just as many Iranians despise their own regime’s failures.

Anyways, we are venturing far off topic now.

 

[Lulldapull]

Forever war, thanks to stupid establishment policies.

This jahiliyat needs to be stopped ASAP…….pashto hatred toward other ethnicity people is a disgrace and totally unacceptable.

 

[Vsdoc]

Doc, I believe in judging regimes based on their actions, not just their religious or ideological labels. The Pehlavi era had its flaws, but under it, Iran was a stable, and rapidly modernizing nation with strong global ties. Today, the IRI’s policies whether crushing dissent at home, fueling conflicts abroad, or mismanaging the economy have brought immense suffering to ordinary Iranians.

My criticism isn’t about religion; it’s about the regime’s oppressive governance and reckless foreign policy. And let’s be honest whatever limited support Pakistan maintains for Iran is purely out of strategic necessity, not admiration. Since the Revolution, Iran has been hostile to Pakistan, whether through backing Baloch insurgents, fueling violence in Karachi in the 1990s, or cozying up to India at our expense. Many Pakistanis see this clearly, just as many Iranians despise their own regime’s failures.

Anyways, we are venturing far off topic now.

It not off topic at all. To discuss the regime and politics and foreign relations of a nation that shape conflicts. And the response of international players. No nation is an island.

The Pahlavis were western plants. Oil was discovered. And Pahlavi Iran was no different to today's Saudi Arabia in terms of sovereignty.

The revolution was hijacked by Islamic hardliners.

The revolution was not wrong.

The same reason the Pahlavi son in exile being planted back in Iran by the west is never going to succeed.

In the end Iran is going to be broken and violently splintered and open for oil rapine just like all the other fallen middle eastern regimes.

Forgive me if as Zoroastrian Persian I do not wish that on my ancestral land and people.

 

[steppeWolff]

It not off topic at all. To discuss the regime and politics and foreign relations of a nation that shape conflicts. And the response of international players. No nation is an island.

The Pahlavis were western plants. Oil was discovered. And Pahlavi Iran was no different to today's Saudi Arabia in terms of sovereignty.

The revolution was hijacked by Islamic hardliners.

The revolution was not wrong.

The same reason the Pahlavi son in exile being planted back in Iran by the west is never going to succeed.

In the end Iran is going to be broken and violently splintered and open for oil rapine just like all the other fallen middle eastern regimes.

Forgive me if as Zoroastrian Persian I do not wish that on my ancestral land and people.

Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

As for the Revolution, its original ideals whether democratic, nationalist, or even religious were indeed hijacked by hardliners, and the result has been catastrophic for ordinary Iranians. The Islamic Republic’s policies have isolated Iran economically, radicalized its politics, and turned it into a pariah state all while claiming to resist ‘imperialism.’ Yet today, Iran’s regime fuels conflicts abroad and represses its people at home, making it vulnerable to the very foreign exploitation you fear.

No one wants chaos for Iran. But the current regime’s trajectory, militarization, isolation, and internal repression is what risks fracturing the country, not nostalgia for the past. A stable, sovereign Iran would need a government that prioritizes its people over ideology and regional adventurism. As a Pakistani, I’ve seen how the Islamic Republic’s actions have harmed my country too. That’s not anti-Iranian sentiment, it’s a critique of a regime that has failed its own citizens and its neighbors alike.

That being said, the current scion of the Pehlavi dynasty looks like a village idiot compared to his father. On top of that, he's a proven cuck. What a fall eh

 

[Vsdoc]

Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

The exact same can be said about the British in undivided India.

Bottom line was that they were planted in place of Mossadegh to get the oil.

 

[Vsdoc]

Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

As for the Revolution, its original ideals whether democratic, nationalist, or even religious were indeed hijacked by hardliners, and the result has been catastrophic for ordinary Iranians. The Islamic Republic’s policies have isolated Iran economically, radicalized its politics, and turned it into a pariah state all while claiming to resist ‘imperialism.’ Yet today, Iran’s regime fuels conflicts abroad and represses its people at home, making it vulnerable to the very foreign exploitation you fear.

No one wants chaos for Iran. But the current regime’s trajectory, militarization, isolation, and internal repression is what risks fracturing the country, not nostalgia for the past. A stable, sovereign Iran would need a government that prioritizes its people over ideology and regional adventurism. As a Pakistani, I’ve seen how the Islamic Republic’s actions have harmed my country too. That’s not anti-Iranian sentiment, it’s a critique of a regime that has failed its own citizens and its neighbors alike.

That being said, the current scion of the Pehlavi dynasty looks like a village idiot compared to his father. On top of that, he's a proven cuck. What a fall eh

Whatever change has to come to Iran, has got to be organic and driven by Iranians.

It is their country.

The US is no one.

 

[Lulldapull]

Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

As for the Revolution, its original ideals whether democratic, nationalist, or even religious were indeed hijacked by hardliners, and the result has been catastrophic for ordinary Iranians. The Islamic Republic’s policies have isolated Iran economically, radicalized its politics, and turned it into a pariah state all while claiming to resist ‘imperialism.’ Yet today, Iran’s regime fuels conflicts abroad and represses its people at home, making it vulnerable to the very foreign exploitation you fear.

No one wants chaos for Iran. But the current regime’s trajectory, militarization, isolation, and internal repression is what risks fracturing the country, not nostalgia for the past. A stable, sovereign Iran would need a government that prioritizes its people over ideology and regional adventurism. As a Pakistani, I’ve seen how the Islamic Republic’s actions have harmed my country too. That’s not anti-Iranian sentiment, it’s a critique of a regime that has failed its own citizens and its neighbors alike.

That being said, the current scion of the Pehlavi dynasty looks like a village idiot compared to his father. On top of that, he's a proven cuck. What a fall eh

Problem though is that the GCC k bhungi all agreed to suck dick along with the turkiyan guppu people too. All their money is deposited in the west and they are only allowed to buy junk eff-sola or third class Chinese weapons which don’t even work bhai. Then big western corporations enter the fray and take up all infrastructure work and suck up all the remaining cash too. The 1000 dalit princes are allowed to have some money for hookers and partying and the Turks allowed to sell liquor and cater to western tourists on budget travel packages. Hendu-Pak slave labor erects tall buildings and keeps streets clean so as long as population is low in the GCC.

Hamain Pakistan main to Kuchh nahi mila ye sub kar k……our country is not even livable anymore due to security reasons.

Iran cannot agree to slavery like the other dalit countries have accepted.

Iranians will hang anyone who accepts slavery as the path forward as suggested by trump sahb.