[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
469
14K
More threads by Saif


BIDA sees gas tariff hike as 'discriminatory'
Doulot Akter Mala
Published :
Apr 17, 2025 08:50
Updated :
Apr 17, 2025 20:10

1744935813306.png


The investment promotion authority found the recent gas tariff hike as ‘discriminatory’ for new investors and apprehended that it would put an adverse impact on its ongoing efforts to attract new investment.

The hike just after the investment summit would ‘undoubtedly’ create a negative perception among the aspiring investors, said Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA) executive chairman in a letter to BERC.

The latest upward revision, on April 13, 2025, of gas prices by 33 per cent would put a higher tariff burden on the new investors compared to that of the existing one.

However, BIDA said it supported the government’s effort to cut subsidy but it should not be discriminatory.

“The government can consider trimming the subsidy uniformly,” BIDA Executive Chairman Chowdhury Ashiq Mohammad Bin Harun wrote in a letter sent to the Chairman of the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC) on Tuesday.

In the letter, obtained by the FE, Mr Chowdhury found the necessity to review the gas tariff hike decision for the sake of new investment and keep economic mobility unhindered.

Talking to the FE, Energy Adviser Md Fouzul Kabir Khan said investors were queuing up with their investment proposals despite the gas tariff hike.

“Many investors are willing to make investment despite this gas price. So far, we have more than 300 investment proposals who have agreed to invest at this price,” he told the FE.

It’s BERC’s discretion to review it, but the government is not in a position to subsidise for an unlimited period, he said.

In the letter, the BIDA chair said the discriminatory policy on gas tariff would affect new investment and discourage country’s competitiveness.

“Investors have already taken stance against the decision,” he wrote.

BIDA thinks that this decision would hinder the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flow to Bangladesh, he added.

To attract investment, the Bangladesh Investment Summit-2025 was held from April 7 to 10 in the city.

A total of 450 investors from 40 countries participated in the summit.

“A number of investors have signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and agreements with the BIDA showing their interest to invest in Bangladesh,” Mr Chowdhury wrote.

In the letter, Mr Chowdhury sought sincere cooperation of BERC to set an investment friendly gas tariff rate.

He suggested a review and impact analysis workshop to discuss the issue.

Talking to the FE on Wednesday, BERC chairman Jalal Ahmed said they were yet to officially receive the letter.

“We are open to discuss the issue in the commission and also with the Petrobangla that has put forward the proposal of gas tariff hike, if it creates any controversies,” he said.

The BERC chairman said the commission delayed the decision of gas tariff hike considering the investment summit.

Nahian Rahman Rochi, Head of Business Development of BIDA, said the BIDA chair put forward the proposal to review as differential tariff structure will dissuade new investors from entering the market.

“We are happy to organise a consultation to further discuss and pros and cons about it,” he said.

However, Mr Rochi urged the BERC to do review it within the fastest possible time.

“….and we need to ensure that the ultimate decision on rate is investment friendly,” he said.

Preferring anonymity, representative of one large foreign investor said the energy advisor have played smart, with this new concept, everyone is against rather discriminatory price between old and new, next move he will do is equalize old industry in to new industry to Tk 40 per cubic meter from today’s rate of Tk 30 cm.​
 

Abnormal capacity charges show power sector abuse
Emran Hossain 19 April, 2025, 00:10

1745022677384.png


Greatly varying capacity charges paid to power companies with similar capacities highlight a chronic ill practice by the past Awami League regime, sending Bangladesh’s economy into a tailspin.

The Bangladesh Power Development Board calculated the capacity charges considering the use of 60 per cent capacities of the power plants.

Established about the same time using the same technology, some power plants received way more capacity charge than their peers, 300 per cent or even more, per unit of electricity produced, revealed a BPDB analysis.

The list of beneficiaries invariably included AL favorites whose names frequently surfaced in reports, including the white paper published by the incumbent interim government in December last year, as power companies raking abnormal profits, often flouting the law.

‘The varying capacity charges speak of too many ill practices,’ said Hasan Mehedi, member secretary, the Bangladesh Working Group on Ecology and Development.

From manipulating loans to bribing politicians to distorting information on equity to tampering expenses, private power companies left no stones unturned to inflate their capacity charges, he noted.

‘The sad news is they are still enjoying the privilege despite a political changeover promising to end such favours,’ he said.

Capacity charge is the amount of money the BPDB pays a power-sector investor, covering the power plant’s establishment cost plus its estimated profit, regardless of whether the plant produces or does not produce electricity.

Energy experts explained that capacity charge covers the loans received by a plant, along with interest, employees’ salaries and a return on equity.

Power plants with shorter lifetime could be entitled to a higher rate of capacity charge. Power plants taking loans at high interest rates could also result in excessive capacity charge payment, energy experts said.

‘Usually the return on equity remains about 12 per cent,’ said energy expert Mohammad Tamim, who was also a member of the team that prepared the white paper on the economy of Bangladesh last year.

Joint ventures were found to be earning 16 per cent return on equity while the Rampal power plant was entitled to an 18 per cent return on equity, he said.

After considering possible investment in power plants by different types of fuels, energy experts gave a range of ideal capacity charge rates per unit of electricity – around Tk 1 for gas-based power plants, maximum Tk 4 for coal-based power plants and Tk 2 for oil-based power plants.

But the situation in Bangladesh is far from ideal.

For instance, the Jamalpur 115MW oil-based power plant, owned by the United Group, received Tk 4.23 for generating per KWh of electricity. The rate is 327 per cent higher than what is paid to another private power producer Raj Lanka for its 52MW power plant in Natore – Tk 0.99. The power plants operate with reciprocating engine. While the Jamalpur plant has been operating since 2019, the Natore plant has been in operation since 2014.

The United Group received Tk 4.26 for a unit of power for its 200MW power plant in Mymensingh, which was established in 2018.

Set up in 2020, the 104MW oil-based Meghnaghat power plant, owned by the Orion Group, receives Tk 3.42 per unit, which is 272 per cent higher than what state-owned oil-based power plant receives on average – Tk 2.39 a unit.

Similarly, the 149MW and the 300MW oil-based Kodda power plants and the 55MW oil-based Madanganj power plant, all owned by the Summit Group, receive in capacity charge for a unit of electricity Tk 3.34, Tk 3.33 and Tk 3.06 respectively. The Summit Group built its power plants between 2016 and 2018. The 200MW oil-based power plant in Chandpur, owned by the Desh Energy, set up in 2018, receives Tk 3.42 per unit in capacity charge. The power plants all have reciprocating engines.

The average capacity charge received by independent oil-based power plants for a unit of power is Tk 3.23, followed by similar public plants earning Tk 2.44 and state-owned power plants Tk 2.39. The state-owned oil-based 100MW Gopalganj power plant, set up in 2011, receives the lowest Tk 0.92 capacity charge per unit.

‘Such huge differences in prices are reminiscent of the absence of competition in the power sector,’ said Shafiqul Alam, lead energy analyst, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.

During the 15 years of the past AL regime, power projects went ahead mainly through one-on-one negotiation without any tender under the indemnity law recently scrapped. The power ministry was under the authority of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina and she oversaw $33 billion investments.

The average capacity charge paid to gas-based independent power plants is Tk 3. The gas-based Meghnaghat 335MW and 583MW power plants, both owned by the Summit Group, receive Tk 3.48 and Tk 3.67 per unit respectively. The power plants were set up in 2015 and 2024 respectively with combined cycle engines.

The 584MW Meghnaghat power plant, owned by the Unique Group and set up in 2024 with combined cycle engine, receives Tk 3.78 per unit.

The average gas-based joint venture projects’ capacity charge stands at Tk 3.71. The 195MW Ashuganj power plant, set up in 2015 and owned by the United Group, receives Tk 3.51 per unit.

There were big anomalies in capacity charges received by public power companies. For instance, the Haripur 100MW plant, set up in 1987, receives Tk 2.42 as capacity charge, far higher than Tk 0.55 received by the Ghorashal 409MW power plant, set up in 1989.

There are other gas-based public power plants that get less than Tk 1 in capacity charge per unit. The average capacity charge received by BPDB-owned gas-based power plant is Tk 1.31. The average capacity charge received by gas-based power plants owned by public companies other than the BPDB is Tk 2.44.

To coal-based state-owned power plants, the average capacity charge paid is Tk 4.63 for each unit. Joint venture coal projects receive an average of Tk 5.43 capacity charge per unit. Independent power plants, on the other hand, get an average of Tk 7.17.

The 1,320MW coal-based Banshkhali power station, owned by the

S Alam Group and set up in 2023, receives the highest Tk 7.34 capacity charge per unit.

The national capacity charge spending is set to reach Tk 38,000 crore in the current financial year of 2024–25. Initially introduced to incentivise private investment to tackle an acute power crisis by the ousted AL government, the capacity charge eventually proved to be a huge burden for the nation.

In September 2023, the then power state minister informed the parliament that in its three consecutive terms, the AL government paid a total of Tk 1.04 lakh crore as capacity charges.

Bangladesh’s power generation overcapacity is about 50 per cent of the total installed generation capacity of 27,645MW. The overcapacity is the result of the inability to buy energy, mainly due to the dollar crisis partly triggered by the massive power sector spending. The energy crisis has also set off a staggering inflation, trapping Bangladesh in a huge debt obligation.

BPDB chair Rezaul Karim said that they are reviewing power purchase agreements and will sit with power companies to present their side of the story.

‘We want to resolve the issue rationally, giving the companies a chance to present their case as well,’ he said.

‘We can assure you that a good result will come out of it,’ he told New Age on Friday.​
 

Bangladesh to buy 3 more spot LNG cargoes by mid-June
FE Online Report
Published :
Apr 19, 2025 19:50
Updated :
Apr 19, 2025 20:00

1745104692053.png


Bangladesh has moved to buy three spot liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes by mid-June to meet mounting summer demand.

State-run Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Ltd (RPGCL) floated three separate tenders to procure three spot LNG cargoes for May 22-23, June 5-6 and June 12-13 delivery windows, a senior RPGCL official told The Financial Express Saturday.

The country’s energy demand has gone up since March with the advent of summer and is expected to grow further with the rise of mercury.

Bangladesh has been buying three spot LNG cargoes for the delivery windows of March and April, respectively.

The bid winners will deliver the LNG cargoes at Moheshkhali Island in the Bay of Bengal, with options to discharge the cargo at either of the country’s two floating storage re-gasification units (FSRUs) located on Moheshkhali Island.

The RPGCL, a wholly owned subsidiary of state-run Bangladesh Oil, Gas, and Mineral Corporation, or Petrobangla, looks into LNG trades in Bangladesh.

The volume of each of the spot LNG cargoes will also be around 3.36 million British Thermal unit (MMBtu).

Bangladesh currently imports LNG from Qatar Energy and OQ Trading International under long-term deals and purchases LNG also from the spot market to re-gasify LNG in its two operational FSRUs, having a total capacity of 1.10 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd).

The country has been reeling from an acute energy crisis as its natural gas output is depleting.

Bangladesh has been rationing gas supply to industries, power plants and other gas-guzzling industries to cope with the mounting demand.​
 

Capacity charge ills should not menace power sector
20 April, 2025, 00:00

THIS is unfortunate that the capacity charge — the money that the Power Development Board pays power-sector investors even when the plants do not produce electricity, with an aim to cover the loans that the plants receive, along with interests, salaries of the employees and returns on the equity — continues even after the political changeover of August 5, 2024, with the interim government having promised to end such favours dished out quarters close to the Awami League government that was toppled in a mass uprising. But this does not make up the whole story. What is further unfortunate is that the capacity charges greatly vary depending on power companies with similar capacities. The power board calculates the capacity charge considering the use of 60 per cent capacity of the plants. Set up about the same time with the same technology, some plants receive way more capacity charge than the others do, 300 per cent or even more, as a power board analysis shows, for the production of a unit of electricity. Whilst the capacity charge remains a menace, varying capacity charges suggest that the power sector is plagued with too many ill practices, putting the economy in a tight spot.

Private-sector power producers have tried all every possible means — manipulating loans, bribing politicians, distorting information on equity or tampering with expenses — to inflate their capacity charge. An energy expert who was on the committee that prepared the white paper on the state of the Bangladesh economy, submitted to the government on December 1, 2024, says that the return on equity is usually 12 per cent. Joint ventures are found to be earning 16 per cent return on equity. The Rampal power plant is, however, entitled to an 18 per cent return on equity. In view of possible investments in power plants run on various types of fuel, energy experts say that an ideal capacity charge for plants based on gas is about Tk 1 a unit, for plants based on coal a maximum of Tk 4 a unit and for plants based on oil Tk 2 a unit. But the proposition remains far from ideal. The average capacity charge paid to gas-based independent power plants is Tk 3 a unit. The average capacity charge for gas-based independent power plants is Tk 7.17 a unit. The average capacity charge for independent oil-based plants is Tk 3.23 a unit.

With the overcapacity having already been about 50 per cent, this is pressing that the government should rethink the provision, or at least renegotiate, especially after the interim government in November 2024 repealed the Awami League-era Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provisions) Act 2010 that brought in the menace in the energy policy.​
 

Eliminating power subsidy more than a challenge
Published :
Apr 24, 2025 23:32
Updated :
Apr 24, 2025 23:32

1745542621222.png


The International Monetary Fund's (IMF) insistence on eliminating power subsidies and raising electricity tariffs has got the interim government in a difficult position. These two measures are among the primary conditions for the release of the 4th and 5th tranches of the IMF's $4.7 billion loan. As per the latest IMF review mission, which conducted a comprehensive assessment of Bangladesh's economic landscape, the government is expected to completely remove power subsidies by the 2025-26 fiscal year to qualify for further disbursements from the multilateral body. The IMF has also recommended an upward adjustment in electricity tariffs to reduce the fiscal burden. According to media reports, failure to phase out the electricity subsidy could jeopardise the release of the 4th and 5th tranches of the loan.

However, the reality on the ground in Bangladesh's power and energy sector starkly by no means corresponds to these expectations. The interim government recently revised the national budget, increasing the total subsidy allocation from Tk 360 billion to Tk 620 billion. Over the years, electricity subsidies have escalated, largely due to the proliferation of independent power producers (IPPs) and rental power plants that operate at high costs. To manage the growing fiscal pressure, the Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) has begun ramping up generation from coal and gas-fired power plants -- seen as more cost-effective options. This shift is part of a broader strategy to gradually reduce dependence on expensive IPPs. Nonetheless, some newly commissioned IPPs have already begun supplying power to the national grid under previously signed power purchase agreements (PPAs), and their outstanding payments remain a financial liability. The BPDB has informed the IMF that it may take a few more years to clear these dues and trim overall subsidies.

The IMF's call for a zero-subsidy regime stems from its emphasis on building a sustainable, market-driven economy. However, many economists argue that such a model may not be suitable for a power-starved country like Bangladesh. Removing subsidies so soon could have far-reaching consequences, particularly for the manufacturing sector which is highly dependent on affordable energy. The ripple effects could include higher inflation, a spike in production costs, and a decline in export competitiveness -- outcomes that are likely to undercut the very economic stability the IMF loan aims to support. A more balanced and pragmatic approach would be to implement a gradual phase-out of subsidies, allowing industries and common consumers time to adapt. A sudden and complete withdrawal, as suggested by the IMF, may result in economic disruption that outweighs the benefits of the $4.7 billion loan.

It is crucial for Bangladesh to secure the IMF funds, including the additional $3.0 billion agreed upon recently, but not at the cost of macroeconomic stability. Currently, a high-level delegation from the interim government is in Washington, D.C., participating in the IMF-World Bank annual meetings. Their mission is to negotiate the release of the delayed tranches and to persuade the IMF to adopt a more flexible approach to subsidy reform. There is hope that with careful diplomacy and sound economic reasoning, the delegation can convince the global lender to support a gradual transition that better aligns with the country's current realities.​
 

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Back