[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
756
28K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Billions of taka worth of gas lie unused for want of a Tk 6 billion pipeline!

Monoj Dey

1788651416300.webp

Bhola and surrounding areas are considered Bangladesh’s second most promising hydrocarbon hub.

The Middle East war, which began on 28 February following a joint US-Israeli attack and aggression against Iran, has now continued for more than six months. Although the battlefield is more than 3,500 kilometers away, the fallout from the war has hit Bangladesh’s cities, villages, and small towns alike. Fuel and electricity prices have risen once, but far from bringing the situation under control, the crisis has only deepened.

Load-shedding, which had spread across villages and small towns, is now in the capital too. The shortage of gas has driven up costs everywhere, from cooking at home to shopping in the markets. At CNG filling stations, motorists are unable to get gas even after waiting for long periods. Production has fallen across all factories, from food-processing plants to export-oriented industries. With fertiliser factories shut down, agricultural production, including the Aman rice crop, and food security are also coming under threat. Electricity shortages are disrupting healthcare services as well.

Nearly 50 per cent of Bangladesh’s energy and electricity generation depends on gas. The price Bangladesh is now paying, down to the last penny, is the result of the steady shift toward import dependence in the gas sector since 2016. The war in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s attack and aggression against Ukraine in February 2022, had already exposed just how disastrous this dependence on imports could become. Yet no lessons were learned from that crisis.

At a time when the entire country and economy are suffering from gas and energy shortages, what could be more unfortunate than being unable to use our own gas? When will the decision finally be made to bring Bhola’s gas to the mainland through a pipeline?

The crisis began soon after the then-government celebrated 100 per cent electrification by setting off fireworks. As European countries stopped buying Russian gas, the price of relatively cheap LNG on the spot market rose sharply. Oil prices also continued to climb. Foreign exchange reserves began to deplete rapidly as the country spent more on purchasing fuel. Even after electricity and gas prices were raised repeatedly, the energy crisis remained unresolved.

The energy crisis pushed the entire economy toward disaster. According to government figures, inflation kept rising until it reached 13-14 per cent. Economic growth and employment began to lose momentum. The cumulative anger of poor and marginalised citizens who had suffered continuous losses in real income and employment, along with young people facing an uncertain future, erupted in July-August 2024.

The Iran war has once again laid bare Bangladesh’s energy insecurity. A recent World Bank report says that if the crisis in the Middle East is prolonged, Bangladesh could face the risk of losing around 600,000 jobs. Urea fertiliser prices could double. If disruptions in the supply of various agricultural inputs occur, small farmers could face a major blow both to their food security and their incomes. The most worrying finding is that if rice prices rise by 10 per cent because of a fertiliser shortage, another 1.4 million people could be pushed into poverty.

Only 40 to 42 per cent of Bangladesh’s total gas demand is met from domestic sources. The rest has to be supplied through imported LNG. Of the imported LNG, 55 to 60 per cent comes from the Middle East. The war is not only disrupting fuel transportation through the Strait of Hormuz; energy infrastructure in countries such as Qatar, from which Bangladesh imports LNG under long-term contracts, has also been damaged. As a result, five of Petrobangla’s six LNG supply contracts have been declared under “force majeure.” Bangladesh has been forced to purchase LNG from the spot market at more than twice the usual price.

Bangladesh has become trapped in a vicious cycle of crisis centered on energy shortages: unless a reliable energy supply can be ensured, the economy will remain stagnant, while investment and employment will not grow. The crisis in the energy sector did not emerge overnight, and its solution cannot be confined to addressing the present crisis alone.

Otherwise, with any new global crisis, whether caused by war, a pandemic, or something else, the country could once again find itself back at square one.

In 2017, the National Committee to Protect Oil, Gas, Mineral Resources, Power and Ports put forward a master plan for a sustainable solution to Bangladesh’s energy crisis. Recently, economist Anu Muhammad referred to that plan in an article in Prothom Alo titled “There Is a Sustainable Solution to the Gas and Electricity Crisis.”

He wrote that the best path for us is to combine building national capacity to extract our own gas resources with strong policy and institutional measures to realise the vast potential of renewable energy.

Professor Anwar Hossain Bhuiyan of the Department of Geology at the University of Dhaka identified increasing gas exploration and extraction from domestic sources as the most realistic solution in an interview with Prothom Alo on 23 August.

He believes that by developing existing gas fields and conducting deep drilling, using modern technology, and exploring for gas in areas between existing fields, Bangladesh could potentially recover 18 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas, combining current and potential reserves. An investment of Tk 100 billion in gas exploration could yield gas worth Tk 5 trillion.

1788651488702.webp

Although a decision was taken to supply gas from Bhola in CNG cylinders, the initiative proved ineffective. File photo: Prothom Alo

Despite having limited resources and a small workforce, Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company Limited (BAPEX) has had a relatively high success rate in drilling and exploring gas wells. Globally, drilling 8 to 10 wells to find gas in one is considered a successful exploration rate; in Bangladesh, gas has been found in one out of every three wells drilled. The country’s main hydrocarbon, or gas, hub is the region comprising Cumilla, Brahmanbaria, and Sylhet.

Geologists consider Bhola and its surrounding areas to be the country’s second-most promising hydrocarbon hub. Gas has already been discovered at Shahbazpur, Bhola North, and Ilisha, as well as at Sundarpur in Noakhali and in Feni. Gas has also been found offshore at Kutubdia and Sangu in the southern sea. Taken together, these discoveries make the entire region highly promising for gas exploration.

Gas production in Bangladesh has been declining steadily since 2016-17. Yet despite the discovery of substantial gas reserves in Bhola, the gas has not been brought into the national grid through a pipeline. When shortages emerged, authorities adopted stopgap measures to transport gas after converting it into LNG and CNG, but these solutions failed to address the problem. In 2018, a decision was taken to build a pipeline to bring gas from the island district of Bhola to the mainland.

A report by Bonik Barta says the project was left on the back burner during the Awami League government simply because of the need for Tk 6 billion. The pipeline was not built even after eight years, on the grounds that transporting the gas through a pipeline would not be economically viable. Yet the three gas fields discovered so far in Bhola alone hold nearly 5 TCF of gas, with a current market value of around Tk 5 trillion. Not even half of the fields’ daily production capacity is currently being extracted.

As a result, the biggest question is whether there are powerful vested interests behind the failure to bring Bhola’s gas to the mainland through a pipeline. A pipeline was not built because Tk 6 billion was deemed too expensive, even though thousands of crores of taka have been provided in annual subsidies for LNG imports. The unfortunate reality is that the same pipeline that could have been built for Tk 6 billion at the time would now cost Tk 30-40 billion.

Even during the 18 months of the interim government, no specific decision was taken to bring Bhola’s gas into the national grid. The current government has also yet to decide whether the pipeline will extend to Khulna or Dhaka. At a time when the entire country and economy are suffering from gas and energy shortages, what could be more unfortunate than being unable to use our own gas? When will the decision finally be made to bring Bhola’s gas to the mainland through a pipeline?

* Manoj De is Editorial Assistant, Prothom Alo​
 

Pertamina to get O&M contract for BD's first SPM
1789106610109.webp


Indonesian state-run company -- PT Pertamina -- is all set to bag the operation and management (O&M) contract of Bangladesh's maiden single-point mooring (SPM) for carrying fuel from vessels in outer anchorage to onshore storage tanks.

The state-run Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) recently completed the evaluation for selecting the O&M contractor to initiate the operation of the country's much-needed oil carrying infrastructure two years after its installation, a senior official of the Energy and Mineral Resources Division (EMRD) under the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MPEMR) told The Financial Express on Thursday.

A total of 11 companies had purchased tender documents to compete in the bidding, and three of them submitted bids in February this year to carry out the job.

After inking the deal, the Indonesian company will carry out the operation and management job for five years.

The Indonesian company has been selected as the O&M contractor following re-tendering.

Pertamina was the lone bidder in the initial tender, which was cancelled due to higher than expected price quotes.

During the BPC's previous tender, the Indonesian company had quoted $117 million, which was around 33 per cent above the BPC's budget of $88 million, resulting in the cancellation, said sources.

The SPM has already been kept idle for two years, and the BPC is counting extra money while using lighter vessels to carry fuel from mother vessels to tanks onshore as a consequence.

Chinese firm China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Co Ltd (CPPEC) completed the construction of the SPM with a double-pipeline project and handed over the infrastructure to the BPC in August 2024.

The guarantee period to resolve faults in operations of the SPM, however, expired in February this year, much ahead of its commencement of commercial operation, it has been alleged.

The delay in starting operations of the SPM system is allegedly benefiting private operators, who are earning hefty profits by carrying fuel from outer anchorage to onshore storage through lighter vessels, at the expense of public money, industry insiders said.

Allegations are rife that a vested interest group, working in collusion with private sector beneficiaries, was playing a key role in delaying the SPM and its associated fuel pipelines and infrastructure.

The SPM system is used for piping petroleum from vessels far offshore and onshore storage tanks, thus slashing both time and cost of oil imports.

CPPEC built the SPM system after being selected as a contractor "unsolicitedly" under the currently repealed Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provision) Act 2010.

The project cost escalated by 60 per cent to Tk 80 billion from the initial target of Tk 50 billion.

The installation of the SPM with the double pipeline project was implemented with Chinese concessional loans of around $554 million.

Of the total, China provided around $467.84 million as preferential buyers' credit and the remaining $82.5 million was available as soft loan.

The Exim Bank of China provided the money, to be repaid within 20 years at an interest rate of 2.0 per cent per annum with five years' grace period.

As part of the project, a 220-kilometre pipeline has been installed, with most of it laid in the waters of the Bay of Bengal.

Six storage tanks have also been constructed.

The tanks have a combined capacity of 240,000 tonnes of petroleum products, with 150,000 tonnes designated for crude oil and 90,000 tonnes for gas oil.

Once it is fully executed, the BPC will be able to unload petroleum products from a 100,000-deadweight tonnage tanker within 48 hours, which now takes 11 days.

No lighter vessels would be required to carry fuel from mother vessel, which is now moored at the outer quay, after implementation of the project.

The BPC is currently paying around $5.50 per tonne to lighterage or small vessels, owned mainly by the Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (BSC) to ferry petroleum to its onshore tanks from larger mother vessels.

Once operational, the SPM will save the cost of the BPC in unloading fuel significantly.

The government will be able to save around Tk 8.0 billion alone by reducing transport costs of petro-products from outer anchorage to onshore fuel tankers, market insiders said.​
 

Building sufficient LNG storage facility


1789107269320.webp


Absence of adequate facilities to store liquefied natural gas (LNG) is an unresolved issue for which Bangladesh is paying a heavy price. The country has increasingly become dependent on imported LNG to meet its growing energy needs, yet it has built almost no buffer against disruptions in supply, bad weather or sudden technical failures. As a result, the country is often compelled to buy LNG for immediate consumption, regardless of whether international prices are favourable or prohibitively high.

The consequences are particularly costly. State-run Petrobangla frequently has to pay demurrage to global LNG suppliers when cargo vessels cannot unload their consignments. During the monsoon, rough weather can force LNG carriers to remain stranded in the deep sea, while floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) may suspend ship-to-ship transfer on safety grounds. Reports say, recently Petrobangla had to pay around US$5.0 million to UK-based TotalEnergies Gas & Power Ltd after one of its LNG cargoes remained stranded in the Bay of Bengal because Excelerate Energy's FSRU was out of operation following a fire. To receive the cargo at a later date, Petrobangla had to pay more than US$1.0 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in addition to the contracted price. This is hardly an isolated incident. Petrobangla previously had to cancel at least five spot LNG cargoes and pay penalties when Summit Group's FSRU was shut down following the devastation caused by Cyclone Remal in May 2024. Deliveries were also deferred during Cyclone Mocha the previous year. Such episodes expose the vulnerability of a system that has little room for immediate remedy. The contrast with petroleum products is striking. Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC), despite importing roughly the same annual volume of petroleum products, maintains storage equivalent to about 60 days of consumption and plans to raise it to 90 days. Why should LNG, which has become equally critical to the country's economy, be treated differently?

Bangladesh began importing expensive LNG in 2018 without developing corresponding storage capacity. It now has LNG regasification capacity of around 8.0 million tonnes a year and imports more than 7.0 million tonnes annually, yet remains almost entirely dependent on uninterrupted maritime delivery. An enhanced LNG storage facility would provide that missing buffer. Cargoes could be received when vessels arrive, stored for later use and released into the system when required. More importantly, Bangladesh could take advantage of periods of relatively low international LNG prices to build up reserves instead of being forced to purchase fuel when the market is overheated. Storage would also allow regasification to resume quickly after an FSRU returns to operation.

Energy security is not merely about securing supplies; it is also about having required storage facilities to keep them. Bangladesh has spent billions on importing LNG but has yet to invest adequately in the buffer that could protect those imports from weather, accidents, price shocks and geopolitical disruptions. That omission is becoming increasingly expensive. Building LNG storage may require substantial investment, but continuing without it is likely to cost the country much more.​
 

Power and energy: How costs can be reduced at every stage of the supply chain
The ongoing crisis in the electricity and energy sectors did not develop overnight. Why did this crisis occur? Where were the mistakes and failures in policy-making? What is the way out of this crisis? Energy expert M Shamsul Alam analyses these issues along with proposed solutions to the crisis.


1789108375606.webp
 

Latest Posts

Back