Remarks of prime minister that are unbecoming, unacceptable
THE prime minister Sheikh Hasina’s remarks of July 14 at the press conference on the outcome of her visits to India and China about the ongoing movement for quota reforms in the recruitment of public servants and the movement of teachers of 35 public universities demanding the cancellation of...
www.newagebd.net
Remarks of prime minister that are unbecoming, unacceptable
16 July, 2024, 00:00
THE prime minister Sheikh Hasina's remarks of July 14 at the press conference on the outcome of her visits to India and China about the ongoing movement for quota reforms in the recruitment of public servants and the movement of teachers of 35 public universities demanding the cancellation of the universal pension scheme Pratyay for them are provocative and illegal and, therefore, unacceptable. Referring to quota for the grandchildren of freedom fighters, she has asked whether the grandchildren of razakars — the term that is used to mean the people who collaborated with the killer Pakistani junta during the liberation war in 1971 — would get public service jobs instead. By implication, she has referred to the protesters and the sections in society that sympathise with or support the movement as razakars. This is unacceptable. She has said that the executive has nothing to do with reforms in the quota system and the issue would be resolved in court. But the High Court in its full verdict on July 14 said that the government could frame rules and guidelines to ensure the participation of backward sections of the citizens in public service recruitment as it did in the short verdict on July 11, stating that the government is at liberty to change, reduce or increase the ratio or percentage of quota.
The prime minister's remark about the teachers of public universities now on work abstention demanding their exclusion from the universal pension scheme also appears unbecoming. Noting that the teachers are confused about the pension scheme, which she had already notified the teachers about, the prime minister has said that she would say something after the teachers felt tired of continuing with the movement. If the demand is legitimate, why would the teachers need to wait for a decision until they felt tired of the movement? The remark is insensitive and demeaning for the teachers. This is, therefore, again unacceptable. The prime minister has also said that the criticism of her visits to India and China is reflective of 'mental illness' of the critics. This constitutes intolerance of genuine criticism. The plan to allow India to transport goods from West Bengal to Assam through Bangladesh is nothing short of granting a corridor, which many believe might create national security problems for Bangladesh, in the name of connectivity or transit. Criticism about the proposition is, rather, genuine patriotic concern on part of thinking Bangladeshis. The prime minister's terming such concern to have resulted from mental illness is, therefore, unacceptable again. The prime minister's visit to China appears to have been unsuccessful as Beijing has agreed to grant $137 million in economic aid, included in the $2 billion in grants and loans all, against government expectations of $5 billion. The criticism of the tours is, therefore, non unjustified.
Finally, talking about measures against corruption, the prime minister at the press conference has publicly admitted that an attendant at her house made a fortune of Tk 4 billion and he travelled by helicopter. She has seized his card and other documents when she came to know of the matter. While the incident is a clear example of the abuse of power in making illegal wealth, his dismissal from the job is nothing short of letting him get off scot-free. This is no example of zero tolerance for corruption. There should have, rather, been a criminal investigation against him for corruption.
While the government is, therefore, expected to resolve the legitimate issues of quota protesters and public university teachers with no further delay, it must also not give a corridor to India for goods transport through Bangladesh and show the will to end corruption with an iron fist.
16 July, 2024, 00:00
THE prime minister Sheikh Hasina's remarks of July 14 at the press conference on the outcome of her visits to India and China about the ongoing movement for quota reforms in the recruitment of public servants and the movement of teachers of 35 public universities demanding the cancellation of the universal pension scheme Pratyay for them are provocative and illegal and, therefore, unacceptable. Referring to quota for the grandchildren of freedom fighters, she has asked whether the grandchildren of razakars — the term that is used to mean the people who collaborated with the killer Pakistani junta during the liberation war in 1971 — would get public service jobs instead. By implication, she has referred to the protesters and the sections in society that sympathise with or support the movement as razakars. This is unacceptable. She has said that the executive has nothing to do with reforms in the quota system and the issue would be resolved in court. But the High Court in its full verdict on July 14 said that the government could frame rules and guidelines to ensure the participation of backward sections of the citizens in public service recruitment as it did in the short verdict on July 11, stating that the government is at liberty to change, reduce or increase the ratio or percentage of quota.
The prime minister's remark about the teachers of public universities now on work abstention demanding their exclusion from the universal pension scheme also appears unbecoming. Noting that the teachers are confused about the pension scheme, which she had already notified the teachers about, the prime minister has said that she would say something after the teachers felt tired of continuing with the movement. If the demand is legitimate, why would the teachers need to wait for a decision until they felt tired of the movement? The remark is insensitive and demeaning for the teachers. This is, therefore, again unacceptable. The prime minister has also said that the criticism of her visits to India and China is reflective of 'mental illness' of the critics. This constitutes intolerance of genuine criticism. The plan to allow India to transport goods from West Bengal to Assam through Bangladesh is nothing short of granting a corridor, which many believe might create national security problems for Bangladesh, in the name of connectivity or transit. Criticism about the proposition is, rather, genuine patriotic concern on part of thinking Bangladeshis. The prime minister's terming such concern to have resulted from mental illness is, therefore, unacceptable again. The prime minister's visit to China appears to have been unsuccessful as Beijing has agreed to grant $137 million in economic aid, included in the $2 billion in grants and loans all, against government expectations of $5 billion. The criticism of the tours is, therefore, non unjustified.
Finally, talking about measures against corruption, the prime minister at the press conference has publicly admitted that an attendant at her house made a fortune of Tk 4 billion and he travelled by helicopter. She has seized his card and other documents when she came to know of the matter. While the incident is a clear example of the abuse of power in making illegal wealth, his dismissal from the job is nothing short of letting him get off scot-free. This is no example of zero tolerance for corruption. There should have, rather, been a criminal investigation against him for corruption.
While the government is, therefore, expected to resolve the legitimate issues of quota protesters and public university teachers with no further delay, it must also not give a corridor to India for goods transport through Bangladesh and show the will to end corruption with an iron fist.