Didn't Ziaur Rehman betray you guys?
No he didn't!
He couldn't become a three-star general and president at the age of less than 40 without the help of your guys.
First of all, back in the 70's BD armed forces were too small to have any Lt. General/3-star rank. Zia & his predecessor K. M. Shafiullah, both became BA chiefs as Major General/2-star rank.
Secondly, there's no requirement that someone has to be 40 years old to be promoted to 3 stars! I guess you don't know how meteoric Zia's rise/promotions were in the BA; Zia was promoted one rank (to Lt. Col.) right in the middle of BD Independence War because of his performance while commanding troops in the field. He even raised the first Infantry Brigade/Regiment of BA during '71 independence war, by coalescing mostly EBR units + newly trained civilians (who you think as Muktijoddhas, but Muktijoddhas were both unformed former EBR + newly trained & inducted civilian voluunteers)!
He was 41 when elected as president in 1977.
He blatantly refused China's 50-year strategic partnership offer.
China never offers anyone strategic partnership, forget 50 years? If that was the case your state in the West would've signed such a lofty 50-year strategic partnership deal with China a long time ago. Even N. Korea doesn't have such a deal, they only have a mutual defense pact, but there's no time limit in this defense pact (50-years or otherwise). If China was offering such deals, they would've offered something like what you're saying to the Vietnamese, when Chinese leadership was supplying them with weapons & politically supporting them against the US.
China policy comes from 'Mozlum Jononeta' Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani (a.k.a. 'The Red Maulana'). He was personally friends with high ranking leaders of the Chinese Communist Party & Central Committee. He considered China to be a proper Communist/Socialist country. Unlike US and Soviets, both of which he considered to be imperialist powers. He viewed China as a 3rd pole in the global order, one that doesn't interfere in the internal affairs of other poorer/global south countries and stands by them in their need & support those countries globally at various international forums.
China has always adhered to non-interference in other countries internal affairs;
It was Bhashani who personally helped establish your countries diplomatic relationship with China. After 1975, he advised Zia and other leaders in BS to follow western state's earlier example & establish diplomatic relations between our country & China. Which Zia did.
It was Bhashani who overthrew Ayub & freed political prisoners jailed on false/trumped up charges (including Mujib). It was Bhashani who made the (strategic decision) to withdraw from the 1970 general election, allowing Mujib to win 160 out of 162 parliamentary seats.
Bhashani is the true father of BD & it's founding ideology/identity, Bangalee Muslim Nationalism (one of the main branches from the old Muslim League tree, the other being Muslim Nationalism without any ethnicity attached to it). Bhashani was a prominent leader in the old ML!
Bhashani was the one who also formed 'All Party Language Movement Committee' in January of 1952, and you very well know how the Bangla Language Movement went the very next month (February)! Following year he also formed the Awami Muslim League & then renaming it to just Awami League; basically made the old Muslim League a defunct organization in the 1954 elections (United Front).
Zia formed BNP around core of Bhashani's National Awami Party/NAP and his 'Bangalee Muslim Nationalism' ideology. The only thing Zia did was change the outward appearance, in this case name, to Bangladeshi Nationalism, to make it sound more modern and less tinged with religious/ethnic identifiers.
But those who know about it's history & real meaning, like the indians, are always crying their eyes about how this is just Muslim League 'steely fist' ideology, covered in ethnic/linguistic 'velvety' gloves. There was a thread in the old PK forum about this exact thing, Nationalism is unacceptable to them.
The revolutionaries, Sena Parishad, worked very hard to build a good relationship with China, and Ziaur Rehman destroyed it only to stay in power by pleasing India.
BD didn't have any diplomatic relationship with China, until Zia established it in January 1976! He also repaired BD's relationship with Saudis (and other Muslim nations) and the US/West, while distancing us from Soviet/Indians (the ones who'd go onto kill Zia in 1981).
while having hostile relations with the US/West (the ones who'd finally kill him in Aug 15, 1975) and even other Muslim nations (Saudis/other Gulfies).
made our relationship with other nation almost hostile (and in the case of the western state, completely hostile). She's about to get it from the US/West.
Yes, Zia pleased Indians so much that they forced Tajuddin & Gen. Osmani to relieve him of field command, transfer him to HQ (moving him across the border) where Indians could keep a close eye on him. Only because of what he did to the Indians in Khemkaran sector in 1965 war, which won him the Hilal-i-Jurat (he also won the BD equivalent Bir Uttom), that they never trusted him!
He even killed thousands of Sena Parishad soldiers, burying them in their uniform and boots in the middle of the night in unknown graves.
LOL! So you think Soviets & Indians trying to stage multiple coups with financing and support, to destabilize BD or overthrow a govt. that doesn't kowtow to them should be allowed to happen? Forget Zia, the entire military leadership, along with the civilian leadership, was all for ruthlessly culling these foreign-funded agents.
In September 1977, the 'Japan Airlines Flight 472', was allowed to carry terrorists on board. This was then for no reason, other than to stage a coup, forced down at old Dhaka airport. This hijacking was used as a ploy to launch a full scale coup by enlisted & Jr ranked officers of the BAF. They killed a lot of the mid and high ranking BAF officers (most of whom were repatriated from the west after '71 and some of whom were even veterans of '65 war), who were there to negotiate a hostage rescue deal with the terrorists.
Even after this, during the court martial, military judges retained full independence & exercised freedom of decision making. Zia wasn't even involved in these proceedings, neither did he ever force, or even ask, a military judge to rescind or change their order, even if they released some of the coup mutineers. I know, I had family a member who was one of the prosecutors at some of these trials; in one instance the sitting judge let one of the mutineers go because even though he was part of the coup, the airman not only saved the judge himself from being killed by the other coup plotters, but several other officers.
Later, most of their top leaders became victims of the kangaroo court of Hasina and became martyred.
Along with millions of BD's who have been killed, and the killing is still continuing!
China will act decisively this time. On the recent Peking trip, they sent back Hasina home empty-handed.
That's exactly what China is going to do; they'll sit on their fat asses and twiddle their thumbs while US overthrows fake sheikh hagsina. Just like in 2006 when the US installed renter razakar, the Chinese just stood by!
@Bilal9 @LeonBlack08 @Saif