[🇧🇩] Monitoring Bangladesh's Economy

[🇧🇩] Monitoring Bangladesh's Economy
1K
37K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

The corporate sector in Bangladesh needs a cultural reset

Soud Bin Faisal

1780361351977.webp

Visual: MAGNIFIC

Over the last three decades, Bangladesh’s private sector has become one of the strongest pillars of the national economy. Industries such as ready-made garments, banking, telecommunications, logistics, pharmaceuticals, and information technology have transformed the country into one of South Asia’s fastest-growing economies. Millions of people now depend on private-sector jobs for their livelihoods, and countless families rely on the stability of these professions.

However, behind this economic growth lies a reality that many professionals experience every day but hesitate to discuss publicly. The crisis in Bangladesh’s corporate culture is not limited to low salaries or job insecurity alone. There are deeper issues in the workplace environment like excessive working hours, office politics, favoritism, lack of transparency, and other psychological pressures.

One of the most frustrating issues for job seekers is the lack of transparency. Many companies publish job circulars without mentioning salary ranges, benefits, or clear job responsibilities. Candidates often attend multiple interview rounds without knowing whether the offered salary matches expectations. Many also spend time and money travelling for interviews, only to receive no feedback afterwards. In some cases, positions are informally filled through internal references before the recruitment process begins.

This perception of “reference culture” has weakened trust in merit-based hiring. Many professionals believe that mid-level and senior-level recruitment is often influenced more by personal relationships and lobbying than by competence. Promotions and salary growth are also widely seen as dependent on loyalty to individuals rather than performance. As a result, many capable professionals feel discouraged and undervalued, and this also creates long-term inefficiency in organisational performance and talent retention.

Another major concern is working hours. In many organisations, employees are expected to remain available long after official hours. Late-night calls, extended meetings, and weekend work have become normal, especially in operational roles such as supply chain, sales, and administration. Many employees report being contacted even after midnight, while overtime compensation is often not provided. At the same time, companies may strictly deduct salary for minor delays, creating an imbalance that reduces motivation and fairness while gradually building frustration among employees.

However, some multinational companies demonstrate better practices by paying overtime fairly and respecting working hours. This shows that balanced and humane workplace systems are possible when organisations prioritise professionalism, structured policies, and employee well-being instead of only output.

Office politics is another growing issue. Many employees feel that honesty and straightforward communication are sometimes treated as weaknesses. Those who avoid internal lobbying or favouritism often face limited career growth opportunities. Many professionals also believe that organisational decisions are sometimes influenced by internal groups or informal networks rather than merit, which reduces trust, weakens teamwork, and discourages long-term loyalty.

Communication culture in some workplaces can also be a concern. In certain organisations, strict hierarchy discourages employees from sharing ideas, asking questions, or providing feedback. This limits creativity and creates a fear-based environment where obedience is valued more than innovation or open discussion.

Mental health has become an increasingly serious issue. Long hours, job insecurity, toxic competition, and constant pressure are affecting employees’ psychological well-being. Many report stress affecting family life, sleep quality, and social relationships. Over time, such conditions reduce productivity, creativity, and long-term employee engagement, and also increase burnout and resignation rates across industries.

Leadership quality is another area that needs improvement. In some cases, promotions are based on loyalty rather than managerial skill or proven capability. This results in leaders who may lack communication ability, emotional intelligence, or strategic thinking. Such gaps often lead to unnecessary complexity in decision-making, delayed approvals, and inefficient work processes, which ultimately affect organisational performance and employee morale.

Despite these challenges, Bangladesh’s private sector still has strong potential for growth. However, sustainable progress requires more than economic expansion; it requires ethical leadership, transparency, structured systems, and healthier workplace environments that respect human dignity as much as productivity.

Several reforms could significantly improve the situation—mandatory salary range disclosure in job advertisements, transparent recruitment and promotion systems, stronger enforcement of labour laws, fair overtime compensation, reduced workplace favouritism and political grouping, better work-life balance policies, leadership development and accountability training, and greater emphasis on mental health and employee well-being would collectively create a more transparent, fair, and supportive corporate environment.

Corporate culture directly influences national productivity, economic stability, and human development. A country cannot progress sustainably if its workforce remains overworked, undervalued, and mentally exhausted. Bangladesh’s next stage of development must therefore focus not only on economic indicators but also on building fair, transparent, and humane workplaces. Open discussion of these issues is essential, not to weaken the private sector, but to strengthen its future.

Soud Bin Faisal is a business professional with over 13 years of experience working with several multinational corporations and corporate groups.​
 

Bonded warehouse benefits to cover all exporters: finance minister

Star Business Report

1780534592092.webp


The government will allow all exporters to import required materials duty-free for the production of export items, Finance and Planning Minister Amir Khosru Mahmud Chowdhury said yesterday.

To that end, the bonded warehouse facilities will be extended to any exporters producing goods for overseas markets, not just the garments industry, he said at a pre-budget roundtable organised by the Dhaka Forum Initiative at Hotel Sarina in Dhaka.

“We will no longer tolerate any form of harassment over bonded warehouses. We are significantly simplifying the rules and regulations. Anyone exporting any product from Bangladesh will be allowed bonded warehouse facilities,” Khosru said.

This would allow exporters in promising sectors such as jewellery and diamond cutting to avail themselves of bonded warehouse facilities under back-to-back LC arrangements, according to the minister.

He added that sweeping changes to the bond licence renewal process will be made to improve the ease of doing business.

“Businesses will no longer need to renew bond licences every year,” he said. “Even the annual audit requirement is being removed. Instead, audits will be conducted only once every three or five years,” the minister said.

Stating that there was a lot of opposition to extending the facilities to other sectors, Khosru said, “But I have made it clear that no excuses will be accepted. Those engaged in exports will receive this facility without any tariffs or duties.”

The finance minister said the highest level of corruption occurs in taxation, which is why the government is placing the greatest emphasis on digitising the tax system.

“We can no longer allow businesses to bear huge costs from the time goods arrive at ports until they are released. Reducing the cost of doing business is one of our key priorities,” he added.

Simeen Rahman, group CEO of Transcom, said deregulation and reducing the cost of doing business are essential for Bangladesh’s growth.

“That is the biggest impediment to actual growth,” she said, referring to bureaucratic red tape and inefficiency.

She stressed that attracting foreign direct investment requires reforms in taxation, transparency and the simplification of processes.

Tanvir Ghani, special assistant to the prime minister for investment and capital market affairs, said the government is prioritising deregulation to attract investment and support the country’s next generation of businesses.

“The biggest initiative being taken in this budget is deregulation,” he said, adding that entrepreneurs are “just fed up even before they’ve opened their factories and businesses because of red tape.”

“When the announcements are made on deregulation in the next few weeks, I think you’ll all be happy,” he added.

Sharif Zahir, managing director of Ananta Group, demanded special incentives for man-made fibre (MMF) products to ensure the sustainable growth of the garment sector and attract new investment.

He also demanded that the bond licence approval process be made fully corruption-free and easier.

He added that cotton-based incentives should be withdrawn and the focus should shift to new sectors, such as synthetic fibres and man-made yarns.

“If we provide incentives there, we will be able to handle the 30 percent tariff pressure.

A five-year special incentive policy could be introduced, where support starts at a higher rate and gradually decreases over time,” he said.​
 

Unlocking Bangladesh’s night-time economy

THE night-time economy refers to the range of economic and social activities that continue between evening and early morning, including restaurants, cafés, transport services, retail trade, tourism, healthcare, logistics, cultural events, digital services and informal businesses. In many countries, these activities have evolved into major drivers of employment, urban dynamism and consumer spending. Yet in Bangladesh, particularly in urban centres, the potential of the night-time economy remains largely underdeveloped despite rapid urbanisation, digital expansion and changing lifestyles. As cities grow denser and economic activity becomes increasingly service-oriented, the question is no longer whether Bangladesh has a night-time economy, but whether it is prepared to manage and benefit from it in a structured way.

One of the strongest arguments for expanding the night-time economy lies in employment generation. Restaurants, food delivery services, app-based transport platforms, shopping centres, hospitals, customer support centres and entertainment venues already sustain limited forms of after-hours economic activity. The rise of freelancing, outsourcing and IT-enabled services has further strengthened the feasibility of a 24-hour urban economy, as many professionals work according to foreign time zones rather than local office schedules. Economic activity in Bangladesh is therefore already extending beyond conventional daytime operations, although without the policy recognition or infrastructure support needed for sustainable expansion.

The growth of the night-time economy could also reshape urban consumption and domestic tourism. Middle-class lifestyles, particularly among younger populations, are changing rapidly. Cafés, rooftop restaurants, music events, cinemas, bookstores and recreational spaces have become increasingly visible parts of urban culture. Yet most cities fall economically silent after late evening because of weak infrastructure, inadequate transport, security concerns and restrictive social attitudes. Cities that remain active at night generally attract greater consumer spending, stronger tourism activity and more diversified local businesses. Urban centres such as Chattogram, Sylhet and Cox’s Bazar could potentially develop regulated night markets, food streets and cultural districts capable of attracting both domestic and international visitors.

Women’s participation is another important dimension of this discussion. Increasing numbers of women are employed in shopping malls, fashion houses, beauty services, customer support and other urban service sectors. However, women’s involvement in night-time economic activities remains heavily constrained by harassment, unsafe transport, poor street lighting and insecurity in public spaces. A functioning night-time economy cannot develop through commercial expansion alone; it also requires safer urban environments. Improved policing, reliable public transport, pedestrian-friendly streets and gender-sensitive urban planning would not only support women’s economic participation, but also broaden their access to public space and entrepreneurship.

The transport and logistics sector presents additional economic opportunities. Severe traffic congestion continues to impose major economic costs on urban Bangladesh. Expanding selected commercial operations at night could reduce pressure on daytime traffic while improving efficiency in cargo movement, wholesale trading, e-commerce logistics and supply-chain management. Many countries already rely on night-time logistics systems to improve urban productivity. Bangladesh has already seen partial growth in this area through food delivery platforms and e-commerce operations, suggesting that the foundations of a broader night economy are already emerging.

The cultural and creative sectors could benefit significantly as well. Bangladesh possesses strong traditions in music, theatre, literature, handicrafts and street food culture, yet much of this cultural economy remains weakly commercialised because cities lack organised night-time cultural spaces. Establishing safe and regulated cultural districts could create income opportunities for artists, musicians, food vendors and small entrepreneurs while strengthening urban identity and social interaction. Such spaces may also contribute to reducing the social monotony and isolation often associated with congested urban life.

Despite these possibilities, several structural barriers continue to limit the growth of the night-time economy. Public safety remains one of the most significant concerns. Fear of harassment, mugging and insecurity discourages many people — especially women — from staying outside late at night. Weak law enforcement, inadequate street lighting and unreliable transport systems intensify these anxieties. Social attitudes also play a role. Night-time mobility is often viewed with suspicion, particularly for women, which limits broader acceptance of after-hours urban activity.

Infrastructure limitations further complicate expansion. Most Bangladeshi cities lack reliable late-night public transport, pedestrian-friendly roads, emergency support systems and coordinated urban management for extended economic operations. Power shortages, poor waste management, noise pollution and weak institutional coordination reduce the viability of many night-time businesses. Small entrepreneurs additionally face licensing difficulties, bureaucratic complexity and corruption, discouraging investment in new ventures. Without addressing these foundational weaknesses, attempts to promote a vibrant night-time economy may remain fragmented and uneven.

Unlocking the economic potential of the night-time economy therefore requires a broader policy framework rather than isolated commercial initiatives. Urban development strategies should incorporate after-hours economic planning alongside investments in public safety, smart lighting systems, surveillance infrastructure and dependable late-night transportation. Public-private partnerships could support designated night markets, entertainment districts and cultural zones. Universities, local governments and business associations may also contribute through research and pilot programmes focused on sustainable night-time urban management. At the same time, public awareness efforts are needed to challenge outdated social attitudes and normalise safe, productive participation in urban night life.

The night-time economy remains one of Bangladesh’s least explored avenues for economic diversification, employment generation and urban revitalisation. While security concerns, infrastructural weaknesses and social conservatism continue to constrain its growth, changing lifestyles and digital transformation indicate considerable future potential. If managed through inclusive planning, stronger public safety and effective regulation, the night-time economy could evolve into an important component of Bangladesh’s long-term urban and economic development.

Dr Nasim Ahmed is a former additional secretary to the government and currently works as associate professor of public policy at the Bangladesh Institute of Governance and Management.​
 

After garments: The search for Bangladesh's next export success

M.G. Quibria

Bangladesh’s development story is, by most measures, a qualified success and a cautionary one. A country that gained independence amid famine went on to become the world’s second-largest apparel exporter, reduce poverty rapidly, and sustain growth rates that many of its neighbours would envy. The engine of that transformation was narrow but powerful: cheap labour, preferential market access, and a garment industry that absorbed millions of workers into formal employment for the first time.

That engine is now sputtering. Bangladesh is scheduled to graduate from the UN’s Least Developed Country (LDC) category on 24 November 2026. The newly elected BNP government has formally applied for a three-year deferral to 2029, and the UN is reviewing the request. Whatever the outcome, the trajectory is clear. Preferential market access will narrow, compliance demands will rise, and the LDC cushion will thin. Post-graduation tariffs on garments could rise to 9–12 per cent in the EU alone, with projected export losses of up to seven billion dollars annually, against an export base in which garments account for more than 80 per cent of earnings. This comes as rising wages and competition from Vietnam, Ethiopia, and Cambodia erode the cost advantage that made garments work in the first place.

Eliminating anti-export bias: A floor, not a ceiling

Bangladesh’s garment concentration is not purely a market outcome. It is partly the product of government-created distortions. Import tariffs exceeding 25 per cent in many sectors, compounded by para-tariffs and regulatory barriers, impose a persistent anti-export bias: a hidden tax on every exporter that lacks a special carve-out. The garment industry has exactly that: duty-free inputs via bonded warehouses and back-to-back letters of credit. Footwear, light engineering, agro-processing, and non-garment textiles pay the full price.

The first-order policy response is straightforward: comprehensive tariff rationalisation, elimination of the discretionary Statutory Regulatory Orders that entrench garment privileges, extension of bonded warehouse access to all export-oriented sectors, and a market-determined exchange rate. For sectors adjacent to garments in terms of skills and supply-chain logic, removing the bias may be enough to restore their competitive advantage.

But this argument, while substantially correct, is incomplete. Removing a tax on exports clears the path; it does not build the vehicles to travel it. What Bangladesh ultimately lacks is diversified productive capability: the ability to design, manufacture, and market new products competitively. Pharmaceuticals, technical manufacturing, and knowledge-intensive services face obstacles that price signals alone cannot resolve: coordination failures, learning curves, and knowledge spillovers that markets chronically underprice. These are genuine market failures that create a legitimate role for selective industrial policy.

Bangladesh faces a trifecta of converging pressures: the retreat of globalisation and the narrowing of preferential market access; the rise of AI and the automation of service activities that it had hoped would anchor the next phase of growth; and the impending loss, upon LDC graduation, of the pharmaceutical competitive advantage that the TRIPS waiver has quietly sustained. These are not abstractions. They come with timelines, and those timelines are already short.

The consensus has shifted: Industrial policy is back.

For three decades, developing countries were effectively coerced, through loan conditionalities and structural adjustment programmes, into abandoning industrial policy. The Washington Consensus was not a suggestion; it was an enforcement mechanism. Countries that deviated were penalised, while those that complied, with few exceptions, stagnated.

Now, in a remarkable institutional about-face, the World Bank’s Chief Economist, writing alongside the March 2026 report Industrial Policy for Development, has conceded that this orthodoxy has run its course, observing with disarming candour that the Bank’s earlier advice “has the practical value of a floppy disk today”. The IMF and UNCTAD have moved in broadly the same direction. Industrial policy, defined as deliberate government intervention to develop specific sectors or productive capabilities beyond what market forces alone would generate, was once dismissed as the refuge of statist romantics. It is now encouraged by some of the very institutions that spent three decades stigmatising it.

The new consensus is unambiguous: eliminating anti-trade bias is a floor, not a ceiling. The choice is not between liberalisation and industrial policy, but rather to pursue both simultaneously: remove distortions that penalise exporters while intervening selectively where markets alone cannot generate new capabilities. Drawing on the work of economists such as Ricard Hausmann and Dani Rodrik, a sector qualifies for support when it exhibits latent comparative advantage blocked by coordination failures, knowledge externalities, capital market imperfections, or the under-provision of public goods — failures that private investors cannot self-correct and whose resolution would generate economy-wide spillovers exceeding the private return. This is not a licence to subsidise every struggling industry. It is a practical filter that distinguishes productive intervention from rent redistribution. Applying this filter to Bangladesh’s economy, seven sectors emerge as plausible candidates for selective support (though identifying the right sub-sectors and instruments remains a matter of adaptation and experimentation rather than top-down prescription.)

Seven candidate sectors
Pharmaceuticals and APIs.
Bangladesh meets 98 per cent of domestic pharmaceutical demand and exports to 166 countries. Yet it imports up to 85 per cent of its active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) at a cost of US$1.3 billion per year, a textbook coordination failure that no single firm has the incentive to resolve on its own. The foundation of the sector’s competitiveness is the WTO’s TRIPS pharmaceutical waiver, which exempts LDCs from patent obligations and has enabled royalty-free production of cancer drugs, antiretrovirals, and insulin. Critically, this waiver is tied to LDC status, not to a fixed date: upon graduation, Bangladesh will lose this protection when the TRIPS waiver expires in 2033. The consequences are material: insulin prices alone could rise by as much as eightfold. The API Park at Munshiganj was designed to reduce import dependence before that window closes but has stalled for years because of energy shortfalls, infrastructure gaps, and regulatory coordination failures. Once the API Park’s infrastructure and regulatory coordination problems are resolved, Bangladesh could use a time-limited programme of targeted infrastructure support and conditional credit to address this failure. The precise mix of interventions, however, should be treated as a hypothesis to be tested rather than a blueprint to be implemented.

Light Engineering. With a large number of enterprises and substantial domestic demand, the sector has scale but not export credibility. Fragmented production and the absence of shared testing and certification infrastructure — collective goods that no individual firm can provide — appear to be the binding constraints. Investment in high-quality testing and certification infrastructure, alongside standards development, is the natural starting point, with the specific sub-sectors and product categories refined through pilot programmes and market feedback.

1780630051994.webp

While the ready-made garment sector has long driven Bangladesh’s economic growth, impending LDC graduation and rising global competition mean the country can no longer rely solely on low labour costs and preferential market access. File Photo: Reuters

ICT and Digital Services. Bangladesh has a large freelance ICT workforce and clear potential in digital services. Yet exports reached only US$724.6 million in FY2024–25 against a US$5 billion target, dwarfed by India’s US$224 billion. The failure appears to be an ecosystem issue rather than a talent issue: skills detached from industry demand, weak university-industry linkages, and absent coordination mechanisms. Promising niches include garment-industry compliance software, AI training data at scale, and fintech solutions for mobile-first, low-income economies — areas in which Bangladesh has a genuine contextual advantage — but which niches will ultimately yield export success can only be discovered through structured experimentation.

Leather and Footwear. Exports grew by 29 per cent to US$620 million in FY2024–25, accounting for 0.29 per cent of the global market, which totalled US$215 billion. Environmental certification appears to be the binding collective constraint: international buyers require effluent-treatment standards that no individual tannery can credibly meet on its own. Common effluent-treatment infrastructure and standards certification are first-rank instruments suited to addressing this failure, though the sequencing and cost-sharing arrangements will need to be worked out in consultation with industry.

Shipbuilding. Confirmed export orders worth US$200 million demonstrate real competitive capability in a scale-intensive, steep learning-curve industry. The binding constraint appears to be access to patient long-term capital that commercial banks cannot provide at the required tenors. Conditional directed credit — as a second-rank instrument, deployed once institutional monitoring capacity is established — is the plausible remedy, though the appropriate conditionality structure will require careful design and iteration.

Agribusiness and Food Processing. Cold-chain infrastructure is a public good that private firms systematically under-provide; food-safety certification requires collective regulatory coordination; and export-market credibility for new products is subject to a self-discovery externality — the pioneer bears the full cost of opening a market that all subsequent exporters share. Agro-processing parks, food-safety quality infrastructure, and market-access assistance are the natural first-rank interventions, with specific value chains to be identified through deliberate trial and error rather than central planning.

Green and Renewable Energy. Energy unreliability is a cross-cutting constraint on diversification across all other qualifying sectors. Public investment and well-designed incentives strengthen the case for intervention, but which renewable technologies and supply-chain segments Bangladesh can realistically develop competitiveness in will need to be discovered through sustained engagement with investors and developers.

Removing a tax on exports clears the path; it does not build the vehicles to travel it. What Bangladesh ultimately lacks is diversified productive capability: the ability to design, manufacture, and market new products competitively.

Pharmaceuticals, technical manufacturing, and knowledge-intensive services face obstacles that price signals alone cannot resolve: coordination failures, learning curves, and knowledge spillovers that markets chronically underprice. These are genuine market failures that create a legitimate role for selective industrial policy.

Across all seven sectors, the causal diagnosis points in the same direction: latent comparative advantage blocked by market failures that private investors cannot self-correct. The sector-level analysis above should therefore be read as a map of promising terrain, not a set of firm prescriptions. Successful industrial policy is not a matter of governments picking winners from a list, but of building feedback mechanisms — pilots, performance reviews, and structured dialogue with firms — through which winning combinations of sectors, instruments, and institutions are discovered over time. First-rank instruments — quality infrastructure, coordination mechanisms, and regulatory reform — are the right starting point in most cases. Second-rank instruments — directed credit and conditional subsidies — should follow only where capital-market failures are demonstrable and monitoring capacity exists to enforce conditionality. The potential is not in question; the discipline required to discover and back it is.

The EDF: A warning that bears repeating
Before any of this is attempted, policymakers should be required to review the history of the Export Development Fund. Established in 1989 to provide subsidised foreign-currency loans for imported inputs, the EDF grew over three decades into a US$7 billion facility. Its mandate was export diversification. By that measure, it accomplished essentially nothing. Bangladesh’s dependence on garments is as entrenched today as it was when the fund was created.

No performance conditions were ever attached. No sunset clause existed. And the fund attracted, with the inevitability that anyone familiar with public choice theory would predict, the organised political attention of the garment lobby, the most powerful in Bangladesh’s political economy. When the IMF required the fund to be reduced from US$7 billion to US$2.2 billion, the industry campaigned to restore the original level. The EDF became not an instrument of transformation but a permanent entitlement. The lesson is not that industrial policy cannot work. It is that industrial policy without discipline, conditionality, and insulation from capture does not work. It is also a lesson that sits uneasily alongside any call for structured experimentation: experimentation requires the willingness to abandon what fails, which is precisely what Bangladesh’s political economy has historically refused to do.

Discipline, institutions, and skills
Korea’s industrial policy success in the 1960s and 1970s is routinely cited and almost as routinely misunderstood. What made it work was not the scale of subsidies but conditionality: chaebols received support on the explicit understanding that missing export targets meant losing it. The threat was credible, enforced, and produced firms that eventually competed without support. Bangladesh’s challenge is to replicate that discipline in an environment where almost everything in its political economy runs in the opposite direction.

This requires institutions designed to be capture-resistant rather than goodwill-dependent: a ring-fenced implementation agency with professionally recruited staff; a governing board with genuinely independent membership; performance conditions embedded in primary legislation rather than administrative guidance; and hard sunset clauses requiring demonstrated results for renewal. Small, transparent pilots should precede large bets so that failure, which will happen, remains cheap enough to survive politically.

1780630227438.webp

Moving beyond a narrow export base will require Bangladesh to eliminate deep-seated tariff distortions and rationalise policies to help non-garment sectors successfully legalise and scale up their global trade presence. File Photo: Star

Skills are the overlooked binding constraint. Industrial policy without human capital investment is a building without a roof. A training levy of one to two per cent of payroll on firms in target sectors, directed into industry-controlled funds, connects training to what employers actually need, a model that Malaysia has operated for thirty years. Bangladesh should also be more deliberate in leveraging its diaspora: a significant proportion of Bangladeshis hold middle and senior positions in Western pharmaceutical and technology firms. A structured return programme — salary supplements, tax relief, and fast-tracked approvals — would transfer capabilities that would otherwise take a generation to build.

The reckoning
Bangladesh faces a trifecta of converging pressures: the retreat of globalisation and the narrowing of preferential market access; the rise of AI and the automation of service activities that it had hoped would anchor the next phase of growth; and the impending loss, upon LDC graduation, of the pharmaceutical competitive advantage that the TRIPS waiver has quietly sustained. These are not abstractions. They come with timelines, and those timelines are already short.

Seven sectors offer plausible starting points for a more diversified export base. But the deeper challenge is not merely identifying candidates. It is building the diversified productive capability that Bangladesh still lacks — and the institutional capacity to support new activities selectively. The knowledge of what needs to be done is not the scarce resource. The discipline to do it honestly is.

Dr. M.G. Quibria is an economist and public affairs commentator writing on trade, development, governance, and democratic change in Bangladesh and beyond.​
 

Govt to hold roadshows to attract FDI
Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha . Dhaka 05 June, 2026, 00:22

The government will soon organise roadshows to attract local and foreign investments in closed and unprofitable state-owned factories.

The decision was taken on Thursday at a meeting on the reopening and management of factories under the Ministry of Industries.

Prime minister Tarique Rahman chaired the meeting at his Cabinet Division office in the Bangladesh Secretariat here this morning, said prime minister’s deputy press secretary Mostafa Zulfiquar Hasan (Hasan Shiplu).

During the meeting, the concerned authorities have been instructed to complete necessary preparations regarding the roadshow within the current month of June.

At the meeting, Shiplu said that senior officials of different institutions under the Ministry of Industries presented detailed reports on the current condition, challenges, prospects and required measures relating to the closed and unprofitable factories.

PM Tarique Rahman directed the authorities concerned to identify effective ways to quickly reopen closed factories and turn unprofitable factories into profitable ones, he added.

Shiplu also said that the prime minister also placed special emphasis on attracting both domestic and foreign investments to these factories.

Concerned officials informed the meeting that recommendations from an expert committee are being taken to reopen closed factories and make unprofitable factories profitable.

Commerce and industries minister Khandakar Abdul Muktadir, prime minister’s adviser for finance and planning Rashed Al Mahmud Titumir, Bangladesh Investment Development Authority executive chairman Chowdhury Ashik Mahmud Bin Harun and prime minister’s principal secretary ABM Abdus Sattar were present at the meeting, among others.​
 

Latest Posts

Back