General New proposals against trolling

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Canada China Egypt Finland Germany India Iran Israel Japan Lebanon North Macedonia Pakistan Palestine Qatar Russia Syria Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom United States Yemen
General New proposals against trolling
21
2K
More threads by ThunderCat

G General
We'll release a full document on the rules and expectations of this forum for users and moderators alike. We'll also set out a limit to the number of warnings a user can get before being infinitely banned. This will set out guidelines and make things simple for all of
Mostly agreed. But in order to report trolling, there should be a forum's legal "rule book" to define it and make it unacceptable.

As in username whoever gets flagged but the reason should be deemed unacceptable. Unless the forum adopts a rule forbidding a certain act, it might not be possible to flag let alone sanction a user for the act.

We'll release a full document on the rules and expectations of this forum for users and moderators alike. We'll also set out a limit to the number of warnings a user can get before being infinitely banned. This will set out guidelines and make things simple for all of us.

@Lulldapull @Muji.Iqbal and others, avoid using racial, ethnic, or other slurs and attempting to stir up division and tension. Post as you are but you do not need to incite conflict. Your content can be meaningful without attacks against others.

us.

@Lulldapull @Muji.Iqbal and others, avoid using racial, ethnic, or other slurs and attempting to stir up division and tension. Post as you are but you do not need to incite conflict. Your content can be meaningful without attacks against others.

Thundercat Sir, thenewb77 Sir

Writing the rules is a very good suggestion. It must be done but it is more important to implement rules. This is my friend, that is a regular post, she is gorgeous, he is making 50 posts a day. Issuing a warning while ignoring such facts is difficult and challenging. One person may have been making 50 posts a day but in return he may have been discouraging 10 other users to write 40 posts a day.

It’s the same issue on the other pdf forum where if I say 5 sentences there is serious trouble and I get a 24 hr temp ban on my posting. How is this thread here that we are posting on against Pakistani interests? Or stirring ethnic tensions?

If you can explain to me then I will either stop, or leave.

Fair enough?
Lulldapull Sir

I understand you. The old School Sir thinks you are struggling to understand posts. Your English is better than mine. I use Google translator to translate my Urdu into English. I suggest you to do the same. It will help, it’s free to use and sometimes make you portray like a genius.

I am thinking your posts about Iran are fine. I am thinking some people have a problem with it because of how it’s written and not because of what is written.
 
Thundercat Sir, thenewb77 Sir

Writing the rules is a very good suggestion. It must be done but it is more important to implement rules. This is my friend, that is a regular post, she is gorgeous, he is making 50 posts a day. Issuing a warning while ignoring such facts is difficult and challenging. One person may have been making 50 posts a day but in return he may have been discouraging 10 other users to write 40 posts a day.
When no "LOAD BALANCING" is applied, 50 innocent posts/ back bumps can act as spamming as they eclipse other important posts from the visitors' view. When new visitors see that one single person completely occupies the front page of a forum, they will not spend more than 3 seconds before leaving the site. Imagine if it happens to 20 visitors a day! How many prospective members are lost? There is a stiff competition out there.
 
Thundercat Sir, thenewb77 Sir

Writing the rules is a very good suggestion. It must be done but it is more important to implement rules. This is my friend, that is a regular post, she is gorgeous, he is making 50 posts a day. Issuing a warning while ignoring such facts is difficult and challenging. One person may have been making 50 posts a day but in return he may have been discouraging 10 other users to write 40 posts a day.


Lulldapull Sir

I understand you. The old School Sir thinks you are struggling to understand posts. Your English is better than mine. I use Google translator to translate my Urdu into English. I suggest you to do the same. It will help, it’s free to use and sometimes make you portray like a genius.

I am thinking your posts about Iran are fine. I am thinking some people have a problem with it because of how it’s written and not because of what is written.
My position on national/ international issues is crystal.

1. I'm against tribalism/ ethnic/ sectarian/ backward nonsense
2. I'm against insurgency imposed on my country by both local/ foreign actors.
3. I'm against terrorism no matter who is instigating it, against my country or internationally.
4. Anybody using religion to instigate violence I will not support, not on my conscience.
5. I will always support poor people who are being killed by the big corporations for profit.

If the above are abhorrent beliefs......Happy to go elsewhere bhai......Good luck.
 
My position on national/ international issues is crystal.

1. I'm against tribalism/ ethnic/ sectarian/ backward nonsense
2. I'm against insurgency imposed on my country by both local/ foreign actors.
3. I'm against terrorism no matter who is instigating it, against my country or internationally.
4. Anybody using religion to instigate violence I will not support, not on my conscience.
5. I will always support poor people who are being killed by the big corporations for profit.

If the above are abhorrent beliefs......Happy to go elsewhere bhai......Good luck.

Those are fine. Everyone has the right to freedom of speech and what is on their mind. The issue arises with how that said speech is stated. Always consider the opposing points of view and respectably describe your statements.
 
My position on national/ international issues is crystal.

1. I'm against tribalism/ ethnic/ sectarian/ backward nonsense
2. I'm against insurgency imposed on my country by both local/ foreign actors.
3. I'm against terrorism no matter who is instigating it, against my country or internationally.
4. Anybody using religion to instigate violence I will not support, not on my conscience.
5. I will always support poor people who are being killed by the big corporations for profit.

If the above are abhorrent beliefs......Happy to go elsewhere bhai......Good luck.
Yes Sir I know you are a patriotic Pakistani and I have no issues with you. I think you are a good member and making significant conribution to our forum. I think nobody has a problem with your Pakistaniyat but I am guessing some members have a problem with your Iran-iat.

When I become a moderator I will give you a taweez that you should wear for 7 days and then everybody will love you.
 
It may sound rude, but a discussion forum is a place for people who can read and write. Otherwise, people can go to TikTok, which requires no literacy.
 

Latest Posts

Back