Home Watch Videos Wars Login

[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment

[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment
527
13K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense
Why we fail to save our rivers
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

A blatant river grab

Confluence of Dhaleshwari and Shitalakkhya under siege from Shah Cement​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Toxic waste in our rivers: Stop this threat immediately

By Dr Md Sarwar Hossain , Mohammed Ali Nause Russel , and Alamgir Kabir

Globally, the boundary for biogeochemical flows of natural nutrient cycles, mainly nitrogen and phosphorus, through activities such as fertiliser use and sewage discharge from freshwater to the ocean has already passed a safe operating space for humanity. The concept of river pollution encompasses a broader definition than biogeochemical flows; it is driven by various waste products, including sewage, industrial effluents, nutrients, pesticides, plastics, and chemicals. Yet the boundaries for river pollution are unknown across the globe.

The growing threat of climate change and other sustainability challenges, such as population growth, urbanisation, and water scarcity, is increasing the risk of generating large-scale abrupt or irreversible social–ecological catastrophe. The impacts of river pollution can be drastic or immediate, no matter the drivers, but can severely risk the ecological and societal systems in which we live.

Bangladesh is known as the land of rivers and flooding. River pollution in Bangladesh is a myth to both local and global society. However, the transboundary context of rivers in Bangladesh and growing local drivers, such as industry, population, urbanisation, and degradation of wetlands, have polluted our rivers, where the impacts are experienced in both social and ecological systems. Bangladesh is among the top 20 countries contributing to plastic emissions from rivers to the ocean. Additionally, and alarmingly, India and China are at the top of the list, with which Bangladesh shares many transboundary rivers, including the mighty Ganges and Brahmaputra.

1768699365359.webp

An oil tanker collision near Gabtali on March 11, 2023, released a thick oil slick across a 7km stretch of the Turag River, seriously polluting the water. Photo: Rashed Shumon


Although river pollution in Bangladesh was initially limited to urban areas, mainly around Dhaka city, the transboundary context of the rivers and growing local drivers are increasing pollutants in the rivers. The rivers surrounding Dhaka, including the Buriganga, Turag, and Shitalakkhya, are among the most polluted in Bangladesh. These rivers receive vast amounts of untreated waste from factories (at least ~3,000) that discharge industrial effluent directly into rivers without proper treatment. Forever chemicals, originating from tanneries, textiles, and chemical industries, have been detected in the rivers around Dhaka city. These substances impose a significant risk to the ecosystem and human health due to their unique, persistent nature of stability, accumulation in living organisms, and the challenge of removing these chemicals using conventional methods.

The Department of Environment (DoE) stated in the water quality report (2023) that rivers around Dhaka city do not meet national standards. Our recent analysis of water quality data from eight major rivers, spanning 2017 to 2023, reveals that the water quality is unsuitable for fisheries in the Meghna, Buriganga, Shitalakkhya, and Turag rivers. The decline in water quality is mainly driven by organic and inorganic pollutants originating from municipal sewage, domestic waste, and industrial wastewater (mostly textile and leather).

The presence of heavy metals (chromium, lead, arsenic, copper, and nickel) in major rivers, including rivers in Dhaka city, is alarmingly high. Heavy metal pollution has reached critical thresholds in major Bangladeshi rivers, most notably the Buriganga, Shitalakkhya, Padma, Karnaphuli, and Dhaleshwari. This environmental deterioration is the direct result of rapid urbanisation, agricultural runoff, and poorly managed industrialisation. The effluent profiles of the textile, pharmaceutical, and tannery industries remain the dominant sources of these hazardous metallic contaminants.

1768699411107.webp


Once a vital lifeline for trade and daily life, the Buriganga River now tells a tale of contrast—while boats still carry fresh produce across its surface, untreated industrial waste and sewage pour directly into its waters, turning it into a toxic channel threatening both livelihoods and ecosystems. Photo: Amran Hossain

The agricultural runoff also plays a significant role in river pollution, which in turn negatively impacts irrigation and fish health, ultimately entering the food chain, severely posing health risks (including carcinogenic risks and neurological disorders) due to polluted river waters. With the growing economy and population of Bangladesh, microplastics in river waters are alarmingly increasing due to industrial production and the use of plastic materials, which also significantly spread during the monsoon season due to rainfall and flooding across the rivers in Bangladesh. Though the safety standard for microplastics remains unclear, globally, there is a call to understand the effects of these pollutants and to minimise the production, design, and disposal of plastics more responsibly.

The coastal rivers are highly saline due to sea-level rise, and the reduction of freshwater from upstream imposes risks to the ecosystem, health, and human wellbeing. The daily struggles for safe drinking water and the damage to agriculture, fisheries, and mangrove forests due to high salinity are not hidden from the national and global community. Transboundary rivers such as the Padma and the Brahmaputra have water quality that is close to an unsuitable level for fisheries. Our research findings coincide with the field-based observations and water quality testing results of research led by Dhaka University. In summary, several studies highlight the presence of microbiological (e.g., bacteria and coliforms) and chemical (e.g., chromium, lead, and arsenic) contaminants in the Padma River due to industrial effluent, untreated sewage, and agricultural runoff. This is highly alarming because the Ganges in India and rivers in China are among the most polluted rivers in the world, and many of these transboundary rivers flow through Bangladesh. The growing economy, industrialisation, and population are projected to increase significantly in India, Bangladesh, and China, where industrial waste, urban sewage, and agricultural runoff are poorly managed and often discharged into rivers without proper treatment.

There are many initiatives taken to reduce river pollution, mainly around Dhaka city. River water quality shows improvement, but not enough to avoid risks to the ecosystem and human health. If current trends continue, river pollution in Bangladesh will worsen. Though we do not plan to provide an exhaustive list to reduce river pollution, we underscore some of the key policy implications to avoid social–ecological catastrophes.

First, there are no alternatives to regular monitoring and assessment of water quality. There are several reports and media recommendations for zero tolerance of illegal discharge. Industrial and agricultural pollution data for rivers can be made public through a digital dashboard, where cutting-edge technology, such as machine learning, can provide real-time information on pollution and risks to health and the ecosystem. The government should consider a new rule for sustainability reporting (also known as ESG reporting). This would apply to all government offices, private organisations, and industries in Bangladesh. ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) reporting is how a company shares information about its impact on the environment, society, and management (governance). For example, the European Union already uses a rule called the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). This law requires large companies to be transparent about their environmental and social risks.

Second, the government should impose higher taxes on small plastic packaging, such as mini-packs for shampoo, toothpaste, and biscuits. While these mini-packs are cheap and popular, they cause significant harm to the environment. For example, a large bottle of shampoo is easier to recycle. In contrast, small 5-taka packs usually end up in landfills, drains, and rivers. These packs contain plastic, chemicals, and toxic dyes that pollute the environment. To protect nature, the government should either ban these mini-packs or tax them heavily. This will encourage people to use larger, more sustainable containers. In addition, the collection of household waste (category-wise) systems needs to be urgently addressed to prevent plastics and other waste from entering the water. An E-waste disposal policy is timely, considering the increase in usage of mobile phones, computers, and related electronic devices.

1768699464632.webp

Water, which has been coloured by textile dye and will eventually flow through the Labandha, Turag and Buriganga rivers, is released near a paddy field in the Mawna Union area, north of Gazipur. File Photo: Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters


Third, our garments and other industries are rapidly moving towards sustainability. However, governments need to build strong collaborations with all stakeholders to reduce river pollution. Utilising economic instruments such as water tariffs, enforcement incentives, and a cap-and-trade system can be instrumental in changing the behaviour of private polluters towards supporting river protection. The education system needs to be revisited and tailored to local and national needs while remaining globally excellent. There is an urgent need for collaboration between academia, industry, and other stakeholders to ensure that future leaders are equipped to combat river pollution.

Fourth, negotiation for transboundary waters to ensure the safe operating space of river water is a must. Transboundary water diplomacy needs to include transboundary pollution. This needs to be underscored urgently, as the rapidly growing economies of India and China will generate more waste, possibly without proper wastewater treatment infrastructure. Climate change will add an extra layer of risk to river pollution due to changes in rainfall, and an increase in drought can concentrate pollutants during the dry season and spread contaminants more widely during floods. Negotiating upstream flow agreements and joint monitoring of transboundary rivers are imperative to ensure rivers are safe for people and the ecosystem across South Asia.

Fifth, a systems approach is a must to ensure cost-effectiveness and to avoid the ripple effects of mitigation strategies. This can combine with a push towards a circular economy to ensure maximising the use and reuse of resources by eliminating waste and pollution, circulating products, and regenerating natural capital towards achieving net zero. Thus, systems-thinking-based circular economy is critical to prioritise with a proper, workable action plan in the ‘National Industrial Policy 2022’. The National Industrial Policy 2022 must be effectively linked to relevant government institutions within the official policy framework. For instance, while the National Industrial Policy 2022 provides a detailed timeline of actions and identifies responsible government bodies, a significant implementation gap exists. Specifically, the Medium Term Budget Framework (MTBF) and the Annual Performance Agreement (APA) of these implementing institutions are seldom synchronised with the action plans outlined in the policy. Furthermore, there is a critical absence of a dedicated monitoring body to oversee and follow up on the progress of these inter-institutional actions.

Restoring wetlands and rivers can offer nature-based solutions to river pollution. A large part of the wetlands, canals, and rivers are degraded and lost due to the growing population, urbanisation, and industrialisation. Restoring these wetlands and rivers can help naturally mitigate the risk of pollution to avoid a social–ecological catastrophe.

Key points

1. River pollution is escalating, threatening social–ecological stability.
2. Transboundary flows and local industries are intensifying toxins and plastic pollution.
3. Urban waste, agriculture, and heavy metals endanger both health and fisheries.
4. Weak enforcement, poor monitoring, and inequitable governance exacerbate these risks.
5. Urgent regional cooperation, regulation, and restoration are needed to avert catastrophe.

Dr Md Sarwar Hossain is an Associate Professor & Director of the Postgraduate Programme of the School and Programme Director of MSc in Environmental Risk Management, School of Social & Environmental Sustainability, University of Glasgow, Dumfries, UK.

Mohammed Ali Nause Russel is a PhD researcher, School of Social & Environmental Sustainability, University of Glasgow, Dumfries, UK.

Alamgir Kabir is an Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science, University of Professionals, Bangladesh​
 

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Soil fertility declining, food security under threat

Prothom Alo English Desk Dhaka
Published: 15 Jan 2026, 08: 19


1768957153107.webp

A farmer sprinkles fertiliser to prepare his field for sowing Boro paddy seedlings in the Lakutia area of Kashipur in Barishal on 22 December 2024. Saiyan

Soil is a composite substance. Its components include 45 per cent minerals, 5 per cent organic matter, 25 per cent air, and 25 per cent water. Bengalis also call soil ‘mother.’ Poet Satyendranath Dutta, in his poem Mati from the poetry collections Kuhu and Keka, wrote: “It is not just soil—it is the staff of life; in every particle lies life; within soil plays the game of life; soil itself is the ocean of life.”

Because of the history, time, and processes of soil formation, soil scientists describe it as one of the world’s most astonishing objects and a priceless resource. Yet this invaluable resource is being degraded by various natural and human-induced abuses. Struggling soil is losing its fertility. Food and crop production is declining every day. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) warns that if soil health is not maintained, Bangladesh’s food production could fall by 25–30 per cent by 2050, posing a serious threat to food security.

In the report titled Status of the World’s Soil Resources, published by FAO on the occasion of the International Year of Soils 2015, the condition of soils worldwide and the changes affecting them were described as a threat to human civilisation. The report stated that inappropriate farming practices, along with deforestation and forest destruction, are the main causes of soil health degradation.

A study conducted by the Department of Geography and Environmental Science at Rajshahi University found that the organic matter content of soil in the Barind region ranges between 0.8 and 1.2 per cent, which not only reduces soil fertility but also makes the soil in this region nearly lifeless. In addition, the Barind Multipurpose Development Authority observed during the implementation of various projects that water scarcity and loss of soil fertility have put agricultural production and farmers’ livelihoods under severe challenge.


Soils in coastal regions such as Khulna, Satkhira, and Barguna are facing crisis due to salinity intrusion. On the other hand, even fertile soils in regions like Jashore, Chuadanga, and Kushtia are experiencing disruptions in crop production due to excessive use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides. As a result, food production and supply are being disrupted, placing food security at risk.

Amid such warnings about soil, “World Soil Day” is observed every year on 5 December. The day received United Nations recognition in 2013. This year’s theme was “Healthy Soil for Healthy Cities.”

Excessive use of chemical fertilisers

Jashore–Chuadanga–Kushtia is a major agricultural region of Bangladesh. After Barishal, this region is considered the country’s granary. Farmers here have long been producing all kinds of conventional and unconventional crops, including flowers and fruits. However, production costs are now high. Rahman Mia, a chili and flower farmer from Jashore, said that in hopes of higher yields he applies far more chemical fertilisers and pesticides to his land, yet he does not get proportional output. He buys fertilisers freely from the market and applies them to his fields as he sees fit. He is unaware of soil testing and the “balanced fertiliser recommendation card” based on soil analysis. He also does not know that mobile soil testing laboratories conduct soil tests in the field.

Barind Multipurpose Development Authority observed during the implementation of various projects that water scarcity and loss of soil fertility have put agricultural production and farmers’ livelihoods under severe challenge.
Another farmer from the same area, Mokles Mia, cultivated paddy on nearly two bighas of land. Despite using excessive fertilisers, pesticides, and water, he is not making a profit. On the contrary, his costs are rising day by day. He said that while applying fertilisers and pesticides in the fields, he sometimes suffers from dizziness, breathing problems, skin diseases, vomiting, and other health issues.

An investigation by Prothom Alo found that farmers in almost all districts of the country are applying fertilisers and pesticides at excessive rates. According to Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) data, the country’s total land area is over 14.92 million hectares. Of this, arable land accounts for approximately 8.82 million hectares, about 59 per cent of the total land. According to a 2022 World Bank survey, Bangladesh’s cultivable agricultural land is 8.11 million hectares. Meanwhile, data from the Department of Agricultural Information Services (AIS) show that the current total arable land area in Bangladesh is about over 8.64 million hectares.

A recent study by the Soil Resource Development Institute (SRDI) found that nearly 76 per cent of Bangladesh’s total land has lost fertility due to soil degradation at “moderate to very severe” levels. As a result, crop production is declining by about 5.33 metric tonnes annually, or at a rate of 5–7 per cent per year.

A similar picture emerged from research by the Department of Soil Science at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University. Professor Mosharraf Hossain said that the condition of soil is poor not only in Jashore but in almost all regions of the country. Studies show that along with excessive fertilisers and pesticides, salinity, human waste, plastics, and industrial chemical waste are polluting soil and water. Consequently, the organic matter content in Bangladesh’s soils has now fallen to 1 per cent or even lower.

Large and medium farmers in the Barind region of Rajshahi, Dinajpur, Mymensingh, and Tangail use the highest amount of urea fertiliser. In coastal saline areas, farmers apply more phosphate and less potash. In the haor region, during the boro season, diammonium phosphate (DAP) or mixed fertilisers are used most extensively for rice cultivation. As a result, biodiversity in the haor areas is being damaged at an alarming rate.

In hilly regions, especially in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, the use of chemical fertilisers or pesticides in jhum cultivation was traditionally low. However, in recent times, increased commercial farming has led to excessive and uncontrolled use of chemical fertilisers such as urea, DAP/TSP, MOP, zinc sulfate, as well as pesticides, causing damage to the environment and land.

National averages show that more than 80 per cent of fertilisers used in Bangladesh are urea, 15 per cent are DAP/TSP, and the remaining 5 per cent are potash (MOP), zinc, gypsum, and other fertilisers.

Farmers freely purchase fertilisers from the market and apply them to their land, causing damage to soil, water, and ecosystems. Prothom Alo asked Bangladesh Fertiliser Association President Waliur Rahman about their responsibility in this regard.

Waliur Rahman said that fertilisers and pesticides are supplied to dealers based on specific demand at the field level. Dealers are trained to ensure that fertilisers are not sold to anyone except cardholding farmers. The amount of fertiliser each farmer is entitled to is specified in the fertiliser recommendation card. Monitoring this process is the responsibility of the upazila agriculture officer.

However, the reality in the field is different. Often, due to social, economic, and political pressures, dealers are forced to sell fertilisers, poisons, and pesticides without cards.

Bangladesh’s soils are mainly of five types—sandy, sandy loam, loam, clay, and clay loam. The Soil Resource Development Institute works on determining which fertilisers are needed for which crops and soil types.

Studies show that along with excessive fertilisers and pesticides, salinity, human waste, plastics, and industrial chemical waste are polluting soil and water. Consequently, the organic matter content in Bangladesh’s soils has now fallen to 1 per cent or even lower
GM Mustafizur Rahman, chief scientific officer at the Khulna divisional office of SRDI, said that tests conducted in Jashore, Chuadanga, and Kushtia show that soils in these areas are mainly loam. Farmers are applying nearly double the amount of fertiliser required for crop production in such soils. Due to a lack of awareness, the three fundamental properties of soil—physical, chemical, and biological—are being severely disrupted.

Most soils are nearly dead

According to the 2025 BBS survey, 56 per cent of agricultural land is “not economically sustainable.” Fifty-three per cent of land has half or more of its area damaged. Asked what needs to be done to recover from this situation, Habib Mohammad Naser, chief scientific officer of the Soil Science Division at the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, said that soil with less than 2.5 per cent organic matter is considered dead soil. Citing a recent organic matter status map prepared by SRDI, he said that 78 per cent of the country’s land has organic matter below 1 per cent. Ideally, it should be at least 2.5 per cent. This means that the vast majority of the country’s soils are now infertile and nearly dead.

Bangladesh is a humid subtropical country. Its soils contain very little plant and animal residue, cow dung manure, organic manure, green manure, and peat. Moreover, due to temperature and humidity, organic matter decomposes rapidly, making soils rough and nearly lifeless.

In a 2021 media briefing by Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Agriculture, it was stated that Sri Lanka uses the highest amount of chemical fertilisers in South Asia—about 300 kilograms per hectare—followed by Bangladesh at around 289 kilograms per hectare, and India at about 166 kilograms per hectare. Myanmar uses far less, at approximately 24 kilograms per hectare. However, after Sri Lanka abruptly abandoned chemical fertilisers in 2021 and faced economic and agricultural collapse, it resumed using fertilisers in higher quantities to stabilise the situation.

Meanwhile, India and Bangladesh use pesticides at much higher rates than necessary compared to other countries. In 2023, the PAN Asia Pacific (PANAP), one of the five regional centres of Pesticide Action Network (PAN), conducted a survey in Bangladesh, India, Laos, and Vietnam. The results showed that 92 per cent of the pesticides used in Bangladesh and India are extremely hazardous. In many cases, farmers in these two countries are using pesticides that are banned in Europe.

According to data from the Oxford University–based international initiative Foresight for Food, more than 70 per cent of land in Bangladesh is used for agriculture, producing about 700 million tons of food annually. About 60 per cent of the country’s food comes from arable land. Therefore, maintaining soil health is crucial to reducing future risks to food security and the environment in Bangladesh.

The way forward

To address the problem, Md Zainal Abedin, chief scientific officer of the central laboratory of SRDI, said that the institute has a total of 34 soil laboratories. These include one central laboratory in Dhaka, eight in divisional cities, 10 mobile laboratories across the country, and 15 regional laboratories. The objective is to enable farmers to easily test their soil when needed to determine soil quality and biological health, and to prepare balanced fertiliser recommendation cards accordingly so that fertilisers and pesticides can be applied as required for specific crops and soils.

Excessive fertiliser use not only degrades soil but also negatively affects ecosystems. It contributes to biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. Microorganisms and insects beneath the soil die off, causing nutrient imbalance and loss of fertility. Crop production declines while production costs rise.
According to data from the Department of Agricultural Extension and the Department of Agricultural Information Services, the number of households involved in agriculture in Bangladesh is 16,881,757. The net cultivated agricultural land amounts to 18,636,434 acres. Thus, the soil analysis services provided by SRDI are far below national demand, and the institute cannot reach all 64 districts.

Experts say that establishing laboratories only at the district level would be insufficient given demand and need. Therefore, along with a permanent soil laboratory in each district, a mobile soil testing laboratory is required at each upazila level to provide services to remote villages, wards, unions, and both small and large crop fields.

Bidhan Chandra Das, former professor of the Department of Zoology at Rajshahi University and an ecosystem researcher, said that although soil is an inert substance, it is treated as a living resource. All fauna and flora on the earth’s surface depend on the life force of soil to survive. Excessive fertiliser use not only degrades soil but also negatively affects ecosystems. It contributes to biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. Microorganisms and insects beneath the soil die off, causing nutrient imbalance and loss of fertility. Crop production declines while production costs rise.

Excess chemical fertilisers and pesticides used in soil mix with water, polluting it. They also reduce oxygen levels in water, endangering fish, other animals, plants, and entire ecosystems. Pesticide use harms farmers’ mental and physical health and also damages domestic animals, grazing livestock, wildlife, and beneficial insects. Therefore, experts advocate adopting organic pesticides or natural farming as safeguards for maintaining soil health.

The book Land Degradation in Bangladesh, published by SRDI in 2022, states that about 11.24 million hectares of land in Bangladesh have been degraded or lost fertility, accounting for 76 per cent of the country’s total land. The study identifies deficiencies in organic matter (cow dung manure, organic manure, green manure) and imbalances and shortages of nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur, zinc, boron, calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, molybdenum) as key causes of declining soil fertility.

Currently, chemical fertilisers are used on 98 per cent of the country’s land. The amount of chemical fertiliser used per hectare of cultivable land is 391 kilograms—nearly three times the global average. Moreover, almost all farmers apply fertilisers based on estimation rather than soil testing.

Taking this SRDI publication into account, Mohammad Nazim Uddin, organic agriculture researcher and senior scientific officer at the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, said that the government’s 2018 agricultural policy emphasised increasing the use of organic fertilisers in agricultural land and recommended subsidies or incentives where necessary. To achieve this, subsidies for organic fertilisers should be increased alongside chemical fertilisers. He suggested ensuring that 25 per cent of the total recommended fertiliser subsidy in the budget is allocated to organic fertilisers, if necessary through legislation. This would help protect both public health and state resources.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

People use polythene knowing full well it is harmful

Nilratan Halder
Published :
Jan 29, 2026 23:47
Updated :
Jan 29, 2026 23:47

1769733840466.webp


In a country as small as Bangladesh with an area of 147,570 square kilometres and a population size of 180 million, 8th largest in the world, the per capita use of nine kilogram plastic unfolds a terribly tragic vista the country is heading for. An update of this 2020 estimate is most likely to paint a grimmer picture of the use of plastic and polythene. Even the single-use polythene bags contribute to 821,250 tonnes of plastic waste annually. Now if the unsafe disposal of polythene continues at this rate, what happens 50 or 100 years later is dreadful to think of. The nation will get buried under its discarded polythene waste. Agricultural lands will go underneath the swarms of polythene bags and sheets and water bodies including the rivers and the Bay of Bengal will get severely clogged.

In this context, the Environment and Social Development Organisation (ESDO), a private environmental body, has come up with interesting revelation about the use of poly bags. Not less than 63 per cent people in this country use polythene even though they are quite aware of its deleterious impact on the environment. At the same time, 55 per cent retail traders have expressed their willingness to use any alternative to polythene bags provided that it is economical and readily available. At the function of releasing the report of a survey carried out by the ESDO titled, "Revisiting Bangladesh's polythene ban: Gaps, governance and solution" such interesting results were presented.

What a mindless lack of initiatives or playing to the gallery on the part of successive governments including this caretaker government! The country that earned the distinction of making a law to ban polythene for the first time in the world in 2002 should have given a far better account of itself by this time. Instead, the success in limiting polythene use during the first couple of years was lost to aggressive and indiscriminate use of plastic and polythene bags.

But why? True, polythene shopping bags are damn cheap, convenient and water-resistant allowing the extra advantage of carrying live fish or sliced pieces of meat and fish. Those are weightless and can be thrown away after onetime use. Yet, such plus points are used as an excuse for not making a decisive drive against the substance now posing to be the gravest threat to Bangladesh's land and water bodies. Until 2020, the nation used 977,000 tonnes of plastic annually and only 31 per cent of it was recycled. Over the past five years, the use of plastic may have risen further.

True, consumers are to blame for using the illegal polythene but when the kitchen markets, grocers and other shops generously hand over the purchased items in poly bags, they forget the legal binding and accept the offer. These bags are not only free but also spare customers the trouble of carrying gunny or other bags. Convenience gets the better of awareness of environmental concerns. To reverse this situation, the administration's interference was most necessary. Syeda Rizwana Hasan in charge of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change started, like her predecessors, with a bang and is ending her tenure with a whimper so far as the ban on polythene is concerned. She has also followed in the footsteps of her predecessors who made hollow promise to eliminate use of polythene shopping bags.

In this context, an additional director general of the Department of Environment (DoE), who was present at the (ESDO) function, takes a gibe at the policymakers and formulators of the law for not defining polythene precisely. He claims that polythene bags with handles are banned but not the ones without handles. The presence of grey areas in legal provisions often allows unholy quarters to take undue advantage of the loopholes. Then it is argued that the initial success in containing polythene production could not be sustained because of the exemption of import of raw materials used for packaging in the garment sector. That loophole is abused for production of polythene.

This argument is flawed too. Any half-way-house approach to this dangerous substance not perishable in centuries cannot succeed. Without taking any punitive actions against polythene factories and conducting some showy drives against retail shops or kitchen market for use of those bags, it is impossible to eliminate the use of such non-biodegradable bags. If the production of polythene is completely stopped, the supply line will dry up. More importantly, there is an overriding need for polythene's replacement.

Dr. Mubarak Ahmad Khan, once a chief scientific officer at the Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, developed a kind of water-resistant and bio-degradable jute poly bags from jute cellulose ---ones that are superior to the petroleum-based plastic bags. But this was not followed up by effective commercial venture in order to bring down the comparatively higher cost of production. Had this initiative been taken to a logical conclusion, it would have done a world of good to the environment and the moribund jute sector would stand a chance of achieving a revival of its fortunes. But neither the government nor any private enterprise came forward to provide the commercial push to this outstanding invention.

As far as is learnt, large prototypes of the machine Dr. Mubarak fashioned could be made to produce jute poly bags on a commercial basis aimed at bringing down the production cost near to that of the level of petroleum-based polythene bags. The government of that time or the incumbent one failed to comprehend the immensely beneficial consequence of such a venture. It is, therefore, a mere lip-service when the government sets a target of reducing polythene by 30 per cent by 2030. To save Bangladesh or by extension the world from invasion of plastic and polythene, this important invention should have been patronised by public-private or domestic-foreign collaborations. The world would be a better place to live in if jute poly bags or sheets replaced the existing harmful polythene.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Bangladesh and the West’s double game on trade and climate

By Bishakha Devnath

COP30 concluded in the third week of November, with rich countries pledging $1.3 trillion in annual funding to developing nations in the Global South by 2035. On the other hand, developing nations, including Bangladesh, have witnessed a drama unfold since the start of 2025 under the pretext of “balancing the books” of global trade. The targets set to reset the global climate and economy reflect nothing but Western hypocrisy masked as well-meaning corrective moves.

Before finding links between the two matters, let’s dig deeper into the tension over trade.


The Trump administration has been insisting that developing nations must narrow trade deficits with the US to continue having access to its market. Take Bangladesh, for example. The trade gap between the US and Bangladesh stood at $6.1 billion in 2024. Bangladesh mostly exports ready-made garments to the US to earn dollars much needed to import essential goods for its population of more than 175 million. The US trade-rebalancing pressure has been followed by the European Union. In the first week of December last year, speaking at a dialogue organised by the Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA), EU diplomats insisted on more imports by Bangladesh from the bloc to ensure “mutual benefits”.

After all, no one wants to be left behind at the negotiation table.

So, the focus has now shifted from the rights of low-waged workers to fixing the global supply chain that has apparently unfairly advantaged countries such as Bangladesh, India, China and Vietnam, among others. Has the world forgotten that, as part of globalisation, manufacturing from rich countries moved to poorer nations so that goods and services could be available to people in the former at cheaper prices? While the overall affordability of those living in wealthy nations has improved, increasing their consumption, cheap labourers, for example, in RMG factories in Bangladesh, have struggled to earn a living wage.

1769995332635.webp


File Photo: Star

Garment manufacturers in India, Vietnam and Bangladesh have been competing with each other not to strike a fair deal but to offer the lowest “sustainable” prices within their respective socio-economic structures and labour availability. How could prices be so low yet sustainable that a pair of “made-in-Bangladesh” jeans can be sold at a retail shop in the US at the hourly income of a wage earner there? The answer lies in manufacturers surviving on very low margins and workers toiling every day to live in perpetual deficits.

The US threatened Bangladesh, as it did others, with high tariffs on imports from those nations unless they also imported American produce to reduce trade deficits. The government of Bangladesh scrambled to oblige, as it is about the survival of an industry that earns more than 80 per cent of export revenue, of which more than 18 per cent comes from the US.


In this, there is no scope for price negotiation—the US will sell whatever it has in abundance, and Bangladesh will have to buy it irrespective of whether it needs the products or whether those products can be sourced from cheaper destinations. The sole purpose of the US in this is to protect its industries, create more jobs and help its economy flourish.

American goods, even if the cheapest in the US, reach the market after the payment of the minimum wage in that country. The federal minimum wage, according to the US Department of Labor, is $7.25 per hour, while the minimum wage in the RMG sector in Bangladesh is Tk 12,500 (around $113) per month. Monthly income in Bangladesh is even lower in the informal sector, which accounts for more than 80 per cent of those employed, as per the Labour Force Survey 2022. That means the dollars hard-earned by Bangladeshis will have to be spent on expensive imports to keep earning foreign currency.


Bangladesh signed the latest deal in December last year with the US to buy wheat at $312.25 per tonne—not through bidding but under a government-to-government arrangement—according to a statement from the finance ministry. In July, Bangladesh received the lowest wheat offer at $268.90 per tonne. US wheat at a higher-than-global-market price is not meant to ensure better health for the population in Bangladesh but to support the agricultural industry in the US. In other words, those who live here on bare minimum pay are forced to buy US wheat at higher-than-affordable prices so that more people find a livelihood in American wheat fields.


There may be an argument that the government would subsidise US wheat so poor people living in slums would also be able to buy it at a lower price. But the money spent on subsidies could take a significant slice of Bangladesh’s limited resources, as evident in its poor budgetary allocation for education, health and public welfare. Investments to protect biodiversity and the climate are a far cry.

1769995388496.webp


Bangladesh mostly exports ready-made garments to the US to earn dollars much needed to import essential goods. File Photo: Star


Costly imports from the US are not limited to agricultural products such as wheat and cotton. The US wants to sell its machinery, liquefied natural gas (LNG), defence equipment and Boeing planes too. Bangladesh has already ordered 25 Boeing aircraft, not because it needs that many but as part of a trade and tariff negotiation with the US. The appeasement efforts did not go in vain, as the US lowered tariffs on Bangladeshi goods from 35 per cent to 20 per cent.


Having seen that power play works, the EU has followed suit and is now demanding similar privileges.


The forced selling by the US and the EU will shrink Bangladesh’s capacity to spend on more urgent needs, including tackling climate change and climate adaptation. This may make rich countries richer, securing their white-collar jobs as well—in the aviation industry, for instance—but will leave nations such as Bangladesh with an unsustainable economy.
Apart from the strain on affordability, the purchase of products that the nation does not require will also create more carbon emissions. Such unnecessary emissions in third-world countries should be disapproved of when rich countries are facing higher targets for funding climate change adaptation and mitigation there in the years to come.


Meanwhile, the evolving dynamics of global trade will only concentrate capital further in the West and boost its power to negotiate with the rest of the world. In such a situation, Bangladesh and many other countries will not have the opportunity to choose. Rather, they will have to accept the garbage that the West does not want to keep on its shores.
The process has already begun. Bangladesh has been asked to purchase cotton from the US that it could easily import from neighbouring India and machinery that could be sourced from China. Imports from India and China would involve lower costs and lower shipping charges.

On the other hand, transportation from the US to Bangladesh will cause higher carbon emissions. In the case of imports of high-tech products from the US and the EU, maintenance and repair will also be costlier and involve a carbon-inefficient loop.

1769995412890.webp

File Visual: Anwar Sohel

Over time, developed countries may start pushing products and technologies that have become obsolete there onto nations in the Global South—for instance, the export of used cars—because they will care only for their own economic growth and profits, as is the case now. Several developed countries have already raised eyebrows by shipping undeclared waste to lands in Southeast Asia.


A decade from now, in 2035, when developing and poor nations ask for more money in loans and grants to invest in renewable energy, green technologies, waste management and sustainable living, the West will remain at the helm of climate talks, and countries like Bangladesh will be at their mercy.

Meanwhile, the made-in-Bangladesh T-shirt, which brings an average of $1.76, does not help generate enough earnings for investments in environment-friendly production. But the US and the EU demand both—cheaper garments and manufacturers being responsible towards the global climate. As is the case with climate and trade, the West wants countries such as Bangladesh to care for the climate while, at the same time, bridging trade deficits at the cost of more urgent needs like food security and health.

Bishakha Devnath is the business editor of The Financial Express.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

True patriotism means confronting our environmental crisis

5 February 2026, 00:19 AM
Ahad Chowdhury

1770280235674.webp


When Gita Gopinath, former deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), recently stated at Davos that pollution kills millions of Indians annually and makes investors hesitant, she was accused of being unpatriotic. But the uncomfortable truth is, if stating facts about environmental degradation is considered unpatriotic, then we are choosing nationalist sentiment over national survival.

Gopinath’s central message was economic reality: pollution costs India between five to nine percent of GDP through health losses and reduced productivity. Bangladesh faces an equally severe reality.

Bangladesh ranks second globally for air pollution and harbours the world’s largest arsenic groundwater contamination crisis, affecting 50 million people, and our rivers are systematically degraded through industrial and untreated sewage. The Dupi Tila aquifer, located beneath the Madhupur Clay, is rapidly running out of water. The recent November 2025 5.7 magnitude (M) Narsingdi earthquake revealed that seismic waves were amplified in places due to anthropogenic modification of the subsurface. These are physical realities operating according to chemical and geological principles that do not yield to political pressure.

Such environmental degradation directly influences national economic performance, as when companies move capital, they move people—executives, technical experts, skilled workers. If environmental conditions threaten health, high-value investment hesitates regardless of tax incentives. This is why environmental restoration must be comprehensive, requiring four integrated elements: compliance, decisive action, restoration, and sustainability.

Compliance means enforcing environmental standards based on scientific understanding. Bangladesh has environmental laws; what is missing is consistent enforcement. Decisive action indicates moving beyond studies to actual implementation. Restoration means actively remediating contaminated sites, not accepting existing contamination as permanent. Sustainability signifies maintaining environmental quality while meeting development needs.

A practical, cost-effective measure to convert contaminated industrial sites into restored landscapes is EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) corrective action frameworks adapted to local conditions. It starts with identifying hotspot sources through compliance inspections, facility assessments, and systematic site characterisation using geophysical methods integrated with targeted drilling. Then, pollution is controlled through chemical and biological treatment of wastewater and industrial effluents, potentially including constructed wetlands for additional treatment before discharge.

Pollution is later contained using engineered barriers with locally available clay materials; biological barriers using biochar and indigenous microbes; pump-and-treat systems; in-situ treatment technologies; bioremediation with native plant species; and monitored natural attenuation where appropriate. These approaches, detailed in EPA’s regulatory framework, have successfully restored thousands of sites globally while building local technical capacity.

So, real patriotism would be fixing problems, not shooting messengers. When environment experts validate concerns about river degradation, when seismologists warn about earthquake vulnerability, when researchers document arsenic poisoning, they present evidence and recommend solutions based on data, not political convenience.

Bangladesh’s choice is stark. We can face our crises with courage, implementing comprehensive management based on the four aforementioned elements—compliance, decisive action, restoration, and sustainability—or we can continue with rhetoric about sustainable development while practising environmental destruction until crisis forces restoration under far more difficult conditions.

Dr Ahad Chowdhury is a geologist, currently teaching at Jefferson Community and Technical College in Louisville, Kentucky.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Textile waste management

1770342292050.webp

Improper disposal of textile waste creates serious environmental and public health risks. | Textile Insights

TEXTILE and apparel production are central to Bangladesh’s economic success. The ready-made garment sector has fuelled export growth, employment and economic change over the last 30 years. As the world’s second-largest apparel exporter, Bangladesh’s textile industry supports global fashion markets and employs millions. This industrial growth has greatly reduced poverty and strengthened the economy.Bangladesh cultural tours

However, this success has led to an often-overlooked issue: large-scale textile waste. Without sustainable systems to handle both pre-consumer and post-consumer textile waste, the environmental and social costs threaten long-term development goals. Textile waste management is therefore not just an environmental concern but also a governance and sustainability challenge.

Textile waste occurs throughout the production and consumption process. Pre-consumer waste includes fabric scraps and offcuts generated during cutting, sewing and finishing in factories. Post-consumer waste is made up of discarded garments. Globally, the fashion industry is a major contributor to solid waste, and Bangladesh is no exception.

The RMG sector alone produces large amounts of fabric waste, and increasing domestic clothing consumption is boosting post-consumer textile disposal. Although exact national data are limited, industry estimates indicate that millions of tonnes of textile waste are generated each year from factories and households combined.

The global growth of fast fashion has worsened this issue. Bangladesh imports large amounts of cheap clothing that are often not durable and are quickly thrown away. At the factory level, poor cutting practices, tight deadlines and limited use of waste-reducing technologies lead to more fabric waste. Without a proper recycling system, most textile waste ends up in open land, poorly managed landfills or informal recycling channels with few environmental protections.

Improper disposal of textile waste creates serious environmental and public health risks. Synthetic fibres like polyester, nylon and acrylic are non-biodegradable and can remain in the environment for decades. When textile waste ends up in landfills, harmful chemicals from dyes and finishing agents can leach into soil and groundwater. Many disposal sites lack proper liners, drainage systems and leachate treatment, increasing the risk of contamination for nearby ecosystems and communities.

Microplastic pollution has become an added concern. As synthetic textiles break down, they release microfibers, tiny plastic particles that enter rivers and coastal waters. Studies have found microplastics in waterways near Dhaka and other industrial zones, with textile waste identified as a major source. These pollutants threaten aquatic life, disrupt ecosystems and can enter human food chains. Air pollution is also linked to textile waste when unsorted materials are burned in informal or peri-urban areas, releasing toxic gases and particulate matter that worsen respiratory diseases.

Beyond environmental harm, textile waste management also has important social and economic effects. The RMG sector remains vital for jobs and foreign income, so waste-reduction efforts should not harm industrial competitiveness or workers’ livelihoods. At the same time, unmanaged waste greatly affects low-income communities near dumping sites, where poor infrastructure and limited public services worsen health and environmental risks.

Informal recycling activities like collecting fabric scraps and reselling used clothing generate income for many marginalised groups. However, these activities often occur without formal regulation, occupational safety standards or social protections. Workers may face exposure to hazardous materials and uncertain earnings. Therefore, textile waste presents both a challenge due to environmental damage and social inequality and an opportunity for green jobs and circular economic growth.

A major challenge to effective textile waste management is the lack of a comprehensive policy and institutional framework. Although regulations are in place for industrial pollution and general solid waste, textile-specific guidelines remain weak. Enforcement is inconsistent due to limited technical capacity, fragmented responsibilities, and resource constraints among regulatory agencies.

Recycling and processing infrastructure are also insufficient. Only a few formal facilities can manage large quantities of textile waste and convert it into reusable materials. Without financial incentives for waste segregation, recycling technologies, and value-added reuse, most textile waste remains unmanaged. Poor coordination among government agencies, manufacturers, exporters, waste operators, NGOs and communities further hinders large-scale solutions.

Addressing textile waste requires a comprehensive and inclusive approach. First, stronger policy frameworks are crucial. Clear regulations that focus on waste reduction, reuse, and recycling should be put in place, along with extended producer responsibility schemes that hold manufacturers and brands accountable for the entire product lifecycle. Second, promoting circular economy models through garment take-back programs, better design practices, and industrial symbiosis is essential.

Third, investing in modern recycling infrastructure through public-private partnerships can create green jobs and formalise informal work. Fourth, awareness campaigns can promote responsible consumption, repair, and reuse. Last but not least, enhanced research and data collection are vital to support evidence-based policy and investment decisions.

Textile waste management is at a critical juncture between industrial growth and environmental sustainability. With coordinated efforts from government, industry, civil society, and consumers, Bangladesh can turn textile waste from an obstacle to development into an opportunity for long-term sustainability and inclusive growth.Bangladesh cultural tours

Dr Nasim Ahmed holds a PhD in public policy from Ulster University in the UK and currently works as associate professor of public policy at the Bangladesh Institute of Governance and Management (affiliated with the University of Dhaka).​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Posts you haven't read yet..

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
 
G
O
 
H
O
M
E