Indians themselves face trouble with the "push-in" drive into Bangladesh
Saleh Uddin Ahmed
Updated: 21 Jul 2025, 14: 56
India media as well as various international media are gradually publishing the heart-breaking stories of hapless Indian nationals being forcefully pushed into Bangladesh File Photo: Prothom Alo
The most โfamousโ Bangladeshi in India right now is the former prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Since 5 August last year, many Awami League politicians have also crossed the border and taken refuge in India. Naturally, these Bangladeshis have been excluded from the ongoing โpush backsโ that India is conducting at the border.
What a cruel irony of fate! While genuine Bangladeshis are being received as โguestsโ in India, thousands of Indian citizens are being harassed across various Indian states, labeled as โBangladeshisโ and subjected to push back. Among them are many Bengali-speaking Hindus and Muslims. The Indian government is using these poor people as tools to implement Prime Minister Narendra Modiโs political agenda of teaching Bangladesh a lesson.
BJP-ruled states are also using this push back tactic to win over non-Bengali voters in their respective regions and boost the BJPโs vote bank.
On 17 July, in protest of the โabuse of Bengalis in BJP-ruled states,โ Mamata Banerjeeโs Trinamool Congress organised a rally in Kolkata. According to the Bangla daily 'Anandabazar', Mamataโs near 45-minute speech at the rally was dominated by allegations of harassment of Bengalis in BJP-ruled states.
At the protest meeting, Trinamoolโs All-India general secretary Abhishek Banerjee said that the abuse of migrant workers from West Bengal in BJP-ruled states and their detention under the label of โBangladeshiโ is a deliberate assault on democracy.
Indian newspapers and various international media outlets are gradually revealing the heartbreaking stories of these hapless Indian citizens being pushed into Bangladesh. But the Indian government remains unmoved. Although the Modi government has said little publicly on the matter, its actions speak volumes about its intentions.
A report by the BBC from Assam was published in the first week of June. Shona Banu, a 58-year-old resident of Barpeta district in the northeastern Indian state of Assam, told the BBC that she was summoned to the local police station on 25 May. Later, she was taken to a location near the Bangladesh border. She and around 13 others were forcibly sent into Bangladesh. She said no one told her why she was being sent to another country, and she was extremely frightened.
Shona Banu said she has lived her entire life in Assam that she is an Indian citizen, and not an โillegal immigrantโ from Bangladesh.
โThey pushed me at gunpoint. I spent two days in knee-deep water full of mosquitoes and leeches without any food or water,โ Shona Banu told the BBC reporter, wiping away tears. After being kept in the border area for two days, she was taken to an old prison facility on the Bangladeshi side.
After spending two days there, Bangladeshi officials took Shona Banu and several others back across the border and handed them over to Indian authorities. Eventually, the Indian officials sent them back to their homes.
Even now, Shona Banu trembles when she recalls the experience.
It remains unclear why Shona Banu was suddenly sent to Bangladesh and then brought back. However, her case is one of several recent incidents in which Assam authorities, suspecting individuals to be โillegal Bangladeshis,โ have detained people declared โforeignersโ by so-called tribunals and pushed them across the border.
The BBC has found at least six such cases in which people reported that their family members were picked up, taken to a border town, and then โpushedโ into Bangladesh.
Indiaโs Border Security Force, Assam Police, and state government officials did not respond to BBCโs questions.
An Al Jazeera report on Indian โpushbacksโ reveals how India is using its own poor citizens in these operations.
On 31 May, a 67-year-old bicycle mechanic returned home in the northeastern Indian state of Assam after being stranded in Bangladesh for four days.
Aliโs week-long ordeal began on 23 May when police picked him up from his rented home in the small village of Khuadal in Assamโs Morigaon district. The government operation targeted those declared as โforeign nationals.โ After being detained on 23 May, Ali was taken 124 miles away to a detention center in Matia, in Assamโs Goalpara district.
Three days later, early in the morning of 27 May, Indiaโs Border Security Force (BSF) troops transported him, along with 13 others, including five women, in a van to the India-Bangladesh border. They were told that if they tried to return, they would be shot. An Indian journalist reported that the BSF fired four rubber bullets to intimidate them.
Protest in India against the new citizenship law Photo: Reuters
After angry protests from Bangladeshi villagers, Bangladeshโs border guards (BGB) dumped Ali at a border point in Indiaโs Meghalaya state. From there, he made a 10-hour journey through dense forest to finally return home.
According to a report published on 31 May in The Sentinel, an Assam-based newspaper, the BSF received 65 Indian nationals from BGB in connection with this incident.
The eviction of people under the label of โBangladeshiโ has sparked intense backlash in Assam. Protests have spread across Bengali-populated areas of the Barak Valley.
The crisis has deepened following a recent comment by the stateโs Chief Minister, Himanta Biswa Sharma. He stated that in the upcoming census, anyone who declares Bengali as their mother tongue will be identified as a โforeigner.โ
These incidents of โdriving out Bangladeshisโ are now spreading to other BJP-ruled states as well. Numerous cases from Delhi, Bihar, and Maharashtra have recently surfaced in the media.
A human being is not just a pawn for votes; they are citizens of a country, members of a family. If there are problems between two countries or between leaders, they can be resolved through dialogue, not by destroying the lives of oneโs own citizens
It is quite common for migrant labourers from one Indian state to travel to another in groups for work. But these days, it has become increasingly difficult for Bangla-speaking workers to do so. In many Indian states, the policy of โif you speak Bengali, you must be Bangladeshiโ is being enforced, leading to harassment and, in many cases, forced deportation to Bangladesh.
One such incident recently came up in the Kolkata High Court in a case involving migrant workers from West Bengal. These labourers had traveled to Delhi for work. There they were detained simply for speaking Bangla. They were suspected of being Bangladeshis. The allegation is that they were held illegally for more than 24 hours without even verifying their identity.
The petitionerโs lawyer informed the court that these six migrant workers from Paikar in Birbhum were detained in Delhi on suspicion of being Bangladeshis and were then sent to Bangladesh. The local police station reported that those detained on suspicion of being Bangladeshis were handed over to the BSF and subsequently โpushedโ into Bangladesh.
According to a report in Kolkataโs daily Anandabazar Patrika, the Kolkata High Court posed a series of questions to the central government regarding this โBangladeshi identificationโ operation: โWhy did the drive to identify Bangladeshis suddenly begin across multiple Indian states? What is the reason behind it? Why was the month of June chosen for this operation across all states? Was this premeditated? Are people really being arrested simply for speaking Bangla?โ
In the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, BJP opposition leader Suvendu Adhikari has now raised a new alarm over the alleged infiltration of Rohingyas. He claimed that Rohingyas are entering West Bengal through the Bangladesh border. In an unusual demand, he called for immediate house-to-house searches.
After the partition of India in 1947, migration between India, Pakistan, and then East Pakistan was a fairly normal occurrence for several years. For some, it was due to family reasons; for others, it was a voluntary choice. Governments at the time accepted this movement as natural. None of them maintained much documentation or official records of such migration.
Later, under the BJP government, various laws were introduced selectively to harass certain communities by demanding documentation. This harassment has sometimes been based on language, sometimes on religion, and sometimes indiscriminately, especially targeting Bangla-speaking labourers working in other states. One of the most extreme forms of such harassment is the โpush-inโ into Bangladesh.
If we compare this with the refugees who came to Bangladesh from India, a very different picture emerges. They were called โBihari refugees.โ Biharis settled in areas like Mohammadpur in Dhaka, Khalishpur in Khulna, Pahartali in Chattogram, and Saidpur in Rangpur. After Bangladeshโs
independence, many Biharis refused to take Bangladeshi citizenship for a long time. Logically, the government of Bangladesh could have pushed them back to India, since they had originally come from there. But no Bangladeshi government chose that inhumane path.
The claim that Bangladeshis go to India for livelihood is nothing more than propaganda or an illogical assertion. It is true that many Bangladeshis take risks to go to the Middle East, Europe, Canada and the United States in search of a better life and livelihood. But including India on that list is unreasonable.
According to the IMFโs 2025 survey, the per capita income of Indians is 2,937 dollars, while that of Bangladeshis is 2,774 USD, very close. Indiaโs job market for professionals is far more competitive than in Bangladesh. And labourers certainly do not earn more working in Indian cities than they would in Bangladesh. In Indian cities where wages are slightly higher, such as Mumbai and Delhi, the cost of living is also exorbitant. So, it is not logical at all to argue that Bangladeshis would illegally go to India for work.
The Indian government must stop this โpush backโ practice. Numerous media reports have shown how many poor Indian citizens are being harmed by it and growing disillusioned with their own leaders.
A human being is not just a pawn for votes; they are citizens of a country, members of a family. If there are problems between two countries or between leaders, they can be resolved through dialogue, not by destroying the lives of oneโs own citizens. That is deeply inhumane.
* Saleh Uddin Ahmed is a writer and political analyst.
Bangladesh Defense
www.newagebd.net
en.prothomalo.com
