[🇺🇸] USA News/Views

[Saif]

US startup Apptronik raises $350 mln to create humanoid robots

US-based robotics firm Apptronik has secured $350 million in a recent funding round, spearheaded by B Capital and Capital Factory, with additional backing from Google’s parent company Alphabet. The funding will be used to scale production of the company’s humanoid robot, Apollo, which is...

www.thedailystar.net

US startup Apptronik raises $350 mln to create humanoid robots

Apollo, the humanoid robot built by Apptronik, Inc. at Austin, Texas, US. Photo: Reuters/Evan Garcia/File photo

US-based robotics firm Apptronik has secured $350 million in a recent funding round, spearheaded by B Capital and Capital Factory, with additional backing from Google's parent company Alphabet.

As per a report by Reuters, the funding will be used to scale production of the company's humanoid robot, Apollo, which is designed to automate tasks in supply chains, such as moving packages in warehouses and manufacturing facilities.

The investment places Apptronik alongside other robotics players, such as Tesla and Nvidia-backed Figure AI, in the rapidly evolving field of humanoid robotics, states the report. With AI advancements at the forefront, these companies are racing to develop robots capable of performing increasingly complex tasks. Elon Musk's Tesla, for instance, has made significant strides in its Optimus robot, which is intended to assist with household chores.

As per Reuters, Apptronik CEO Jeff Cardenas described the funding as a pivotal moment for the robotics industry, likening it to the rapid growth seen in large language models (LLMs) in 2023. He pointed to 2025 as a key year for robotics, anticipating major developments in the field.

Apptronik aims to extend Apollo's use beyond logistics, with plans to explore applications in sectors like healthcare and elder care. The company has also confirmed partnerships with Google DeepMind's robotics team, automotive giant Mercedes-Benz, and logistics firm GXO. However, details regarding these commercial agreements remain under wraps, adds the report.​

 

[Saif]

Trump deporting people at a slower rate than Biden's last year in office

US President Donald Trump deported 37,660 people during his first month in office, previously unpublished US Department of Homeland Security data show, far less than the monthly average of 57,000 removals and returns in the last full year of Joe Biden's administration. A senior Trump administratio

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Trump deporting people at a slower rate than Biden's last year in office
REUTERS
Published :
Feb 22, 2025 01:10
Updated :
Feb 22, 2025 01:10

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conduct an arrest as part of US President Donald Trump's wide-ranging immigration crackdown in Chicago, Illinois, US January 26, 2025 in a still image from video. Photo : Immigration and Customs Enforcement/Handout via REUTERS/Files

US President Donald Trump deported 37,660 people during his first month in office, previously unpublished US Department of Homeland Security data show, far less than the monthly average of 57,000 removals and returns in the last full year of Joe Biden's administration.

A senior Trump administration official and experts said deportations were poised to rise in coming months as Trump opens up new avenues to ramp up arrests and removals.

DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said Biden-era deportation numbers appeared "artificially high" because of higher levels of illegal immigration.

Trump campaigned for the White House promising to deport millions of illegal immigrants in the largest deportation operation in US history. Yet initial figures suggest Trump could struggle to match higher deportation rates during the last full year of the Biden administration when large numbers of migrants were caught crossing illegally, making them easier to deport.

The deportation effort could take off in several months, aided by agreements from Guatemala, El Salvador, Panama, and Costa Rica to take deportees from other nations, the sources said.

The US military has assisted in more than a dozen military deportation flights to Guatemala, Honduras, Panama, Ecuador, Peru and India. The Trump administration has also flown Venezuelan migrants to the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay. Trump said in late January that his administration would prepare to detain up to 30,000 migrants there despite pushback from civil liberties groups.

The military-assisted deportations could grow considering the Pentagon's vast budget and ability to surge resources, according to Adam Isacson, a security expert with the Washington Office on Latin America think tank.

EXPANDING DEPORTATIONS

Meanwhile, the administration is moving to make it easier to arrest deportable migrants without criminal records and to detain more people with final deportation orders.

Last month, the Justice Department issued a memo allowing ICE officers to arrest migrants at US immigration courts, rolling back a Biden-era policy that limited such arrests.

On Wednesday, the US State Department designated Venezuela's Tren de Aragua and seven other criminal gangs and cartels as terrorist organizations. Under US immigration law, alleged gang members designated as terrorists and people with ties to the groups could become deportable.

The Trump administration is also pulling from ICE’s investigative arm, the Justice Department, the IRS, and State Department to assist with arrests and investigations.

Jessica Vaughan, a policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower levels of immigration, said those investigative agents could help crack down on employers who hire workers without legal status and people who have final deportation orders.

“Those are all harder cases,” Vaughan said. “In the case of a worksite operation, you've got a lot of planning to do, some investigation that precedes it, all of which takes a lot of time.”

During Trump’s first three weeks in office, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested about 14,000 people, border czar Tom Homan said last week. That amounts to 667 per day - twice last year’s average but on pace for a quarter million arrests annually - not millions.

ICE arrests spiked to around 800-1,200 per day during Trump’s first week in office, then fell off as detention centers filled up and officers surged to target cities returned home.

“It's going to be like turning a supertanker for the first few months,” Isacson said. “The civilian part of the US government can only do so much.”

During Trump's first month in office, ICE doubled arrests of people with criminal charges or convictions compared with the same period a year ago, according to data provided by DHS.

While arrests have risen, ICE detention space remains a limiting factor. The agency currently holds around 41,100 detainees, with funding to hold 41,500.

About 19,000 of those detainees were arrested by ICE while about 22,000 were picked up by US border authorities, according to agency data published in mid-February.

Of the 19,000 arrested by ICE, around 2,800 had no criminal record, according to the same agency data. The figure was up from 858 in mid-January, before Trump took office.

The Republican-led US Senate on Friday passed a bill to provide $340 billion over four years for border security, deportations, energy deregulation and additional military spending. But the party remains divided on how to move forward with the funding plan, with Trump pressing for the funding to be combined with tax cuts.​

 

[Saif]

Trump urges Musk to be more aggressive in bid to shrink US government

US President Donald Trump on Saturday urged billionaire Elon Musk to be more aggressive in his efforts to shrink the federal government despite uproar over layoffs and deep spending cuts. “Elon is doing a great job, but I would like to see him get more aggressive,” Trump posted all in

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Trump urges Musk to be more aggressive in bid to shrink US government
REUTERS
Published :
Feb 22, 2025 21:22
Updated :
Feb 22, 2025 21:22

Elon Musk listens to US President Donald Trump speak in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, Feb 11, 2025. Photo : REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

US President Donald Trump on Saturday urged billionaire Elon Musk to be more aggressive in his efforts to shrink the federal government despite uproar over layoffs and deep spending cuts.

“Elon is doing a great job, but I would like to see him get more aggressive,” Trump posted all in uppercase letters on his Truth Social platform. “Remember, we have a country to save, but ultimately, to make greater than ever before. MAGA!”

Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE - an entity created by Trump - has swept across federal government agencies, firing tens of thousands of federal government workers from scientists to park rangers, mostly those on probation.​

 

[Saif]

UN rights chief laments ‘shift in direction’ in United States

The UN rights chief yesterday voiced deep concern over the United States’ “fundamental shift” in direction since Donald Trump returned to power, and decried the “unchecked power” of “unelected tech oligarchs”.

www.thedailystar.net

UN rights chief laments ‘shift in direction’ in United States

The UN rights chief yesterday voiced deep concern over the United States' "fundamental shift" in direction since Donald Trump returned to power, and decried the "unchecked power" of "unelected tech oligarchs".

Addressing the United Nations Human Rights Council, Volker Turk voiced his strongest rebuke to date of the dramatic about-face seen in the United States in recent weeks.

"We have enjoyed bipartisan support from the United States of America on human rights over many decades," he said, before adding: "I am now deeply worried by the fundamental shift in direction that is taking place domestically and internationally".

Without naming Trump, he decried that "policies intended to protect people from discrimination are now labelled as discriminatory".

"Progress is being rolled back on gender equality. Disinformation, intimidation and threats, notably against journalists and public officials, risk undermining the work of independent media and the functioning of institutions."

Turk also lamented that "divisive rhetoric is being used to distort, deceive and polarise".

"This is generating fear and anxiety among many," he warned. "On these issues and more, my office will continue building on our long history of constructive engagement."

Since returning to the White House on January 20, Trump has signed a whopping 79 executive orders touching on issues from foreign policy to transgender rights.​

 

[Saif]

Greenland rejects Trump pledge to make the island American

Greenland’s prime minister on Wednesday hit back at President Donald Trump’s pledge to take the Arctic territory ‘one way or the other’, insisting that islanders did not see their future with the United States or even Denmark...

www.newagebd.net

Greenland rejects Trump pledge to make the island American
Agence France-Presse . Nuuk, Denmark 05 March, 2025, 22:08

Sermitsiaq Mountain looms behind a row of houses in Nuuk, Greenland, on Tuesday. US president Donald Trump has strained relations with Denmark by repeatedly signalling that he wants control over Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory which will hold legislative elections on March 11. | AFP photo

Greenland’s prime minister on Wednesday hit back at President Donald Trump’s pledge to take the Arctic territory ‘one way or the other’, insisting that islanders did not see their future with the United States or even Denmark.

Mute Egede rejected Trump’s expansionist ambitions to annex the sparsely populated but mineral-rich and strategically placed island, in a partisan address to the US Congress in Washington on Tuesday.

‘We don’t want to be Americans, or Danes either. We are Greenlanders. The Americans and their leader must understand that,’ Egede wrote in a Facebook post.

‘We are not for sale and can’t just be taken. Our future is decided by us in Greenland,’ he said, six days before the island’s legislative elections where the longstanding question of independence tops the agenda.

Trump offered only passing lines on world affairs in his speech, focusing on his domestic goals like rounding up undocumented immigrants and slashing government spending.

But he repeated his aspirations to take Greenland and claimed an initial victory on retaking control of the Panama Canal.

Trump said he had a message for the ‘incredible people’ of Greenland. ‘We strongly support your right to determine your own future, and if you choose, we welcome you into the United States of America,’ he added.

But he made clear he would not give up if persuasion fails, saying: ‘One way or the other we’re going to get it.

‘We will keep you safe, we will make you rich, and together, we will take Greenland to heights like you have never thought possible before.’

Denmark, of which self-governing Greenland is part, also rebuffed Trump’s aspirations to take the island, with China and Russia increasingly active in the Arctic, as climate change opens up sea routes.

In Copenhagen, Danish defence minister Troels Lund Poulsen told public broadcaster DR that US annexation of Greenland ‘won’t happen’.

‘The direction that Greenland wants to take will be decided by Greenlanders,’ he said.

Danish foreign minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen called for cool heads to prevail.

‘I think everyone, including us, should be cautious about having all kinds of opinions about the future’ of Greenland, he told Danish television TV2.

US threats to take Greenland would once have been unthinkable, with Denmark a treaty ally of the United States under NATO.

But Trump has made clear he has little patience for European allies, which he again denounced for not spending more on their militaries, with Trump instead seeing a return to an era of big powers taking what they want.

He has similarly vowed to take back the Panama Canal, the crucial link between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans that the United States handed to Panama at the end of 1999.

Trump declared triumph after Hong Kong firm CK Hutchison decided to sell its Panama ports to a US-led consortium.

Trump and secretary of state Marco Rubio had complained that rival China had gained too much influence over the canal and could shut it down in a conflict with the United States.

‘To further enhance our national security, my administration will be reclaiming the Panama Canal, and we’ve already started doing it,’ he said, as he mentioned the port deal.

‘We didn’t give it to China. Gave it to Panama — and we’re taking it back,’ he said.

Trump had earlier not ruled out military force to seize either the Panama Canal or Greenland.

Trump has paradoxically sought to cast himself as a peacemaker. He has vowed to end the war in Ukraine and has rattled allies by suspending aid to the country, which Russia invaded three years ago.

Trump and vice president JD Vance berated Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky when he visited the White House on Friday, calling him ungrateful.

Addressing Congress, Trump read a message from Zelensky in which the Ukrainian leader sought to repair the damage and voiced a willingness to a sign a deal in which the United States would take much of Ukraine’s mineral wealth.

‘It’s time to end this senseless war. If you want to end wars, you have to talk to both sides,’ Trump said.

The Trump administration at the same time has cancelled more than 90 per cent of US development assistance, traditionally a key source of US non-military influence.

Trump has described aid as not in the US interest.​

 

[Saif]

Panama president says Trump ‘lying’ about reclaiming canal

Panamanian president Jose Raul Mulino on Wednesday accused his US counterpart Donald Trump of ‘lying’ about Washington taking back the Panama Canal...

www.newagebd.net

Panama president says Trump ‘lying’ about reclaiming canal
Agence France-Presse . Panama City 05 March, 2025, 22:02

Panamanian president Jose Raul Mulino on Wednesday accused his US counterpart Donald Trump of ‘lying’ about Washington taking back the Panama Canal.

‘Once again, president Trump is lying. The Panama Canal is not in the process of recovery,’ Mulino wrote on X.

‘I reject, on behalf of Panama and all Panamanians, this new affront to the truth and to our dignity as a nation,’ Mulino added, after Trump said that his administration had started to take back the vital waterway.

‘To further enhance our national security, my administration will be reclaiming the Panama Canal, and we’ve already started doing it,’ Trump said in a speech to Congress Tuesday. ‘We’re taking it back.’

Under mounting pressure from Washington, Hong Kong firm Hutchison said Tuesday it had agreed to sell its lucrative Panama Canal ports to a US-led consortium.

CK Hutchison Holdings said it would offload a 90-per cent stake in the Panama Ports Company and sell a slew of other non-Chinese ports to a group led by asset manager BlackRock.

The sellers will receive $19 billion in cash, the company said.

Hutchison subsidiary PPC has for decades run ports at Balboa and Cristobal on the Pacific and Atlantic ends of the interoceanic waterway.

But since taking office in January, Trump has complained that China controls the canal — a vital strategic asset that the United States once ran.

He has refused to rule out a military invasion of Panama to regain control, sparking angry protests and a complaint to the United Nations by the Central American nation.

Since 1999, the canal has been run by the Panama Canal Authority — an autonomous entity whose board of directors is appointed by Panama’s president and National Assembly.

The 80-kilometer long canal handles five per cent of global maritime trade, and 40 per cent of US container traffic.

Beijing has consistently denied interfering in the canal.​

 

[Saif]

French deputy asks for return of Statue of Liberty

France should take back the Statue of Liberty because the US no longer represents the values that led France to offer the statue, a French Euro-deputy said Sunday.

en.prothomalo.com

French deputy asks for return of Statue of Liberty
The Statue of Liberty was unveiled in New York City’s harbour on 28 October 1886 for the centennial of the American Declaration of Independence as a gift from the French people to America. It designed by Frenchman Auguste Bartholdi

A plane is seen during take off in New Jersey behind the Statue of Liberty in New York`s Harbor as seen from the Brooklyn borough of New York on 20 February 2016 Reuters file photo

France should take back the Statue of Liberty because the US no longer represents the values that led France to offer the statue, a French Euro-deputy said Sunday.

“Give us back the Statue of Liberty”, centre-left politician Raphael Glucksmann said at a convention of his Place Publique centre-left movement.

“We’re going to say to the Americans who have chosen to side with the tyrants, to the Americans who fired researchers for demanding scientific freedom: ‘Give us back the Statue of Liberty,’” he told cheering supporters.

“‘We gave it to you as a gift, but apparently you despise it. So it will be just fine here at home,’” he added.

The Statue of Liberty was unveiled in New York City’s harbour on 28 October 1886 for the centennial of the American Declaration of Independence as a gift from the French people to America. It designed by Frenchman Auguste Bartholdi.

Paris does have a far smaller copy of the statue on a small island on the Seine in Paris.

Glucksmann, a staunch defender of Ukraine, has strongly criticised President Donald Trump’s radical change of US policy on the war.

He also took aim at Trump’s cuts to US research institutions, which has already prompted a French government initiative to attract some of them to work in France

“The second thing we’re going to say to the Americans is: ‘if you want to fire your best researchers, if you want to fire all the people who, through their freedom and their sense of innovation, their taste for doubt and research, have made your country the world’s leading power, then we’re going to welcome them,’” continued Glucksmann.

Since Trump returned to the White House in January, his government has cut federal research funding and sought to dismiss hundreds of federal workers working on health and climate research.

Glucksmann also criticised far-right leaders in France, accusing them of being a “fan club” for Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, who is spearheading the president’s efforts to cut spending.​

 

[Saif]

US senator and Trump supporter Daines meets China’s vice premier in Beijing

U.S. Senator Steve Daines, a strong supporter of President Donald Trump, met Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng with warm exchanges in front of journalists on Saturday even as tensions between their countries spiked over trade tariffs and the handling of the illegal trade in fentanyl. Daines, the firs

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

US senator and Trump supporter Daines meets China’s vice premier in Beijing
AP
Published :
Mar 22, 2025 20:18
Updated :
Mar 22, 2025 20:18

U.S. Senator Steve Daines, a strong supporter of President Donald Trump, met Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng with warm exchanges in front of journalists on Saturday even as tensions between their countries spiked over trade tariffs and the handling of the illegal trade in fentanyl.

Daines, the first member of Congress to visit Beijing since Trump took office in January, will meet with Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Sunday and the nation’s No. 2 official will give him an introduction to China’s policies, according to He.

Daines, who previously worked for American consumer goods company Procter & Gamble in south China’s economic hub of Guangzhou, said this trip marked his sixth visit to China. He had met Li in 2018, when he served as the Communist Party secretary of Shanghai.

He said this visit comes at a time when there are some important issues to discuss between China and the U.S.

“I’ve always believed in having constructive dialogue and that has been the nature of all my visits to China over the course of many years,” he said.

The U.S. Embassy in China posted on X later Saturday that Daines voiced Trump’s ongoing call for Beijing to stop the flow of fentanyl precursors from China. Daines also expressed hopes that further high-level talks between the two countries will take place in the near future.

Vice Premier He said that China firmly opposes the politicization and weaponization of economic and trade issues, and is willing to engage in candid dialogue with the U.S. on the basis of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefits, official news agency Xinhua reported. He said the two countries have many common interests and they can become partners and friends to achieve mutual success.

Ahead of the trip that began on Thursday, Daines’ office said he is coordinating closely with the White House and will be “carrying President Trump’s America First agenda.” Daines served as a go-between during the first Trump administration when tariffs were also a major issue.

Daines, a senator for Montana, said on X earlier this week that he would be talking with Chinese officials about curbing the production and distribution of fentanyl and “the need to reduce the trade deficit and ensure fair market access for our Montana farmers, ranchers and producers.”

Just months into Trump’s second term, tensions between the world’s two largest economies have risen after the U.S. imposed 20% duties on Chinese goods and drew retaliatory tariffs of 15% on U.S. farm goods from China. Additionally, the U.S. accuses China of doing too little to stop the export of precursor materials for fentanyl, a highly potent opiate blamed for tens of thousands of deaths in the U.S.

In response, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi earlier this month accused Washington of “meeting good with evil” and said China will continue to retaliate for the United States’ “arbitrary tariffs.”

Beijing also responded with a report detailing its efforts to control the illegal trade in fentanyl, specifically the ingredients for the opioid that are made in China.

The report said that China and the U.S. have held multiple high-level meetings since early last year to promote cooperation, and that its Narcotics Control Bureau holds regular exchanges with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency.

China is committed to cooperation, the report said, “but firmly opposes the U.S. imposition of unlawful sanctions and unreasonable pressure on China on the pretext of responding to fentanyl-related issues.”

Daines arrived in Beijing on Thursday and met with Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu. His trip to the Chinese capital followed a visit to Vietnam where he met top leaders.​

 

[Saif]

Trump signs election order calling for proof of US citizenship to vote

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday that would require voters to prove they are US citizens and attempts to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The sweeping order also would seek to take federal funding away from states that do not c

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Trump signs election order calling for proof of US citizenship to vote
REUTERS
Published :
Mar 26, 2025 23:04
Updated :
Mar 26, 2025 23:04

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday that would require voters to prove they are US citizens and attempts to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day.

The sweeping order also would seek to take federal funding away from states that do not comply.

Trump has long questioned the US electoral system and continues to falsely claim that his 2020 loss to Democratic President Joe Biden was the result of widespread fraud.

The president and his Republican allies also have made baseless claims about widespread voting by non-citizens, which is illegal and rarely occurs.

Last year the Republican-controlled House of Representatives approved a bill that would ban non-citizens from registering to vote in federal elections, a practice that is already illegal. It did not pass the Senate, which was then controlled by Democrats.

The White House's order seeks to achieve similar goals. Voting rights groups argued that it, like the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act that did not become law, would disenfranchise voters, particularly people of color, who do not have access to passports or other required identification.

"We've got to straighten out our elections," Trump said on Tuesday as he signed the order at the White House. "This country is so sick because of the elections, the fake elections and the bad elections, we're going to straighten that out one way or the other."

The order is likely to draw legal challenges.

"This is a blatant attack on democracy and an authoritarian power grab," said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of advocacy group Public Citizen.

In recent years Republicans have tried to put more restrictions on voting, while Democrats have sought to make it easier to vote by supporting mail-in ballot access and early voting opportunities.

Public Citizen noted that about 146 million Americans do not have a passport, and Brennan Center research showed 9 percent of US citizens who are eligible to vote, or 21.3 million people, do not have proof of citizenship "readily available."

According to US law, the US secretary of state can unilaterally cancel passports if it determines they were "illegally, fraudulently, or erroneously obtained" or created through illegality or fraud.

The White House argued that Trump's order would prevent foreign nationals from interfering in US elections. Under the new directive, voters would be asked a citizenship question on the federal voting form for the first time.

"Federal election-related funds will be conditioned on states complying with the integrity measures set forth by federal law, including the requirement that states use the national mail voter registration form that will now require proof of citizenship," a White House fact sheet about the order said.

The order criticized policies allowing mail-in ballots to arrive and be counted after Election Day. The order said Trump's policy is to "require that votes be cast and received by the election date established in law."

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 18 states along with Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Washington, DC, will count ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day, regardless of when they arrive.

Trump's order also requires the secretary of Homeland Security to ensure states have access to systems that verify the citizenship or immigration status of people who register to vote.

It also directs the Department of Homeland Security and an administrator from the Elon Musk-run Department of Government Efficiency to review states' voter registration lists, using a subpoena if necessary, to make sure they are consistent with federal requirements.

The Republican National Committee said on Tuesday it had requested public records from 48 states and Washington, DC, to check how they maintain their voter registration lists.

"Voters have a right to know that their states are properly maintaining voter rolls and quickly acting to clean voter registration lists by removing ineligible voters," RNC Chairman Michael Whatley said in a statement.​

 

[Saif]

Trump plans to fine migrants $998 a day for failing to leave after deportation order

The Trump administration plans to fine migrants under deportation orders up to $998 a day if they fail to leave the United States and to seize their property if they do not pay, according to documents reviewed by Reuters. The fines stem from a 1996 law that was enforced for the first time in 2018,

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Trump plans to fine migrants $998 a day for failing to leave after deportation order
REUTERS
Published :
Apr 08, 2025 22:28
Updated :
Apr 08, 2025 22:28

The Trump administration plans to fine migrants under deportation orders up to $998 a day if they fail to leave the United States and to seize their property if they do not pay, according to documents reviewed by Reuters.

The fines stem from a 1996 law that was enforced for the first time in 2018, during President Donald Trump's first term in office. The Trump administration plans to apply the penalties retroactively for up to five years, which could result in fines of more than $1 million, a senior Trump official said, requesting anonymity to discuss non-public plans.

The Trump administration is also considering seizing the property of immigrants who do not pay the fines, according to government emails reviewed by Reuters.

In response to questions from Reuters, U.S. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that immigrants in the U.S. illegally should use a mobile app formerly known as CBP One - rebranded as CBP Home under Trump - to "self deport and leave the country now."

"If they don’t, they will face the consequences," McLaughlin said. "This includes a fine of $998 per day for every day that the illegal alien overstayed their final deportation order."

DHS warned of the fines in a March 31 social media post.

Emails reviewed by Reuters show the White House has pressed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to handle the issue of penalties, property seizures for migrants who don't pay, and the sale of their assets.

The Department of Justice’s civil asset forfeiture division could be another option for the seizures, one email said.

President Donald Trump kicked off a sweeping immigration crackdown after taking office in January, testing the bounds of U.S. law to increase arrests and deportations. The planned fines target the roughly 1.4 million migrants who have been ordered removed by an immigration judge.

WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE

Trump invoked the 1996 law during his first term to levy fines of hundreds of thousands of dollars against nine migrants seeking sanctuary in churches. The administration withdrew the penalties, but then proceeded with smaller fines of about $60,000 per person against at least four of the migrants, according to court records.

President Joe Biden stopped issuing the fines and rescinded related policies when he took office in 2021.

Scott Shuchart, a top ICE policy official under Biden, said migrants and their supporters could challenge the fines in court but that the threat alone could have a chilling effect.

"Their point isn't really to enforce the law, it's to project fear in communities," he said.

DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The proposed asset seizures against the migrants who fail to comply with final deportation orders could impact U.S. citizens or permanent residents in their households.

The immigration advocacy group FWD.us estimates that some 10 million migrants with no legal status or temporary protections are living with U.S. citizens or permanent residents in what are known as "mixed status households."

The steep fines could hit lower-income immigrants. An analysis of 2019 Census data by the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute found 26% of households with unauthorized immigrants had incomes below the federal poverty line.​

 

[Saif]

President Trump on the warpath

For a president of United States (US) who declared before election that he would like to end all wars, Donald Trump's actions and declarations after he took office make him anything but a pacifist or a globalist. If economic confrontations are considered as close cousins of shooting wars, then the

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

President Trump on the warpath
Hasnat Abdul Hye
Published :
Apr 08, 2025 23:55
Updated :
Apr 08, 2025 23:55

For a president of United States (US) who declared before election that he would like to end all wars, Donald Trump's actions and declarations after he took office make him anything but a pacifist or a globalist. If economic confrontations are considered as close cousins of shooting wars, then the list of belligerent moves crafted by the Trump administration on the bilateral trade front reveal president Trump to be a pugnacious warrior on all fronts. In declaring trade war through tariffs against both friends and foes to resuscitate American manufacturing and vowing to use force for achievement of geo-political goals, Trump has made it abundantly clear that he wants to upend the existing world order violently, if that is what his grand plan requires. Judged by this narrow nationalist perspective, Trump appears no better than Adolf Hitler who waged a world war to retrieve and promote German interests, ignoring the safety and welfare of people of other countries. A brief overview of the policy declarations and actions taken by the Trump Administration so far may show whether this apprehension is reasonable enough to merit serious attention of all countries and call for their unified stand against the fascist display of national interests by America.

The transitional team, put together by president-elect Donald Trump with loyalists, knew what their taskmaster wanted as the agenda for his second term presidency, has prepared a detailed plan of action in each area of his interest. For this the team simply re-booted the programme of the neo-cons and extended the Trumpian political and economic agenda, as revealed during his first term in office. If there is little new in the plan of action unfurled so far, the urgency and ferocity of the policy push across the spectrum of governance is unmistakable. In every sector of intervention, policies are being articulated through presidential executive orders bypassing legislature and ignoring court orders. In internal policy actions the executive branch has thus assumed totalitarian authority, giving the go by to separation of powers enshrined in American constitution. There has been nothing gradual about this tilt towards arch conservatism and autocratic governance chosen to implement it. Everything has been outlined in details and carried out in one fell swoop as is the case with wars waged against enemies.

In the war unleashed on the home front, the values and programs adopted and pursued through policies and programmes by moderates and liberals are in the crossfire of Trump administration. Ditching the ideals of 'diversity, equality and inclusiveness' (DEI), purges of civil and military functionaries have started with a missionary zeal. The policy of affirmative action that somewhat ensured equality in education and employment for groups disadvantaged because of gender, race and sexual orientations, has been denounced under the rubric 'woke' and replaced with the blue print of a divided society. In the polity also, various changes in the electoral process (restricting voting rights, amending powers of election officials etc) through executive orders, democracy as practiced before (free and fair election, accountability of the executive branch) is under serious threat. Even the constitutional limitation on a person elected as president only for two terms may be set aside to suit the ambition of the incumbent president.

The war being waged on the home front includes reversal of policies on such scientific matters of grave import as climate change. As he did during his first term in office, president Trump has pulled America out of the 2015 Paris Climate Accord once again, on the grounds that concerns about climate change are not based on scientific facts and that controlling carbon emissions is not in the interest of America. Simultaneous with the withdrawal from the Paris Accord, Trump administration has terminated all financial incentives for industries to transition into green technology. Furthermore, the cap on drilling for new oil and gas reserves has been removed, followed by the slogan 'drill baby drill'. The Environment Protection Agency (EPA), tasked to protect environment through enforcement of regulations and sponsor research has been effectively dismantled.

On the pretext of reducing the budgetary debt burden public expenditures on such vital areas as federal grants for scientific research have been drastically slashed. The entire Department of Education has been abolished, terminating its beneficial role in various areas of education promotion. Using the same argument, thousands of federal employees have been dismissed or sent on early retirement putting pressure on the job market.

Tech and media giants having backed president Trump in the last election have got their wish about a loose and weak regulatory framework fulfilled as previous rules and regulations controlling their activities have either been whittled down or abolished. Same holds true for financial institutions like banks and institutions linked to the Wall Street.

Unabashedly ushering in a plutocratic regime, president Trump has met the demands of industrial and financial institutions for reduced tax burden. Corporate income tax has been slashed to 20 per cent, while capital gains tax has been brought down to 15 per cent. It is estimated that extending the expiring 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act would decrease the federal revenue by $4.5 trillion from 2025 through 2035.

To help investors and industrial titans, president Trump is determined to have the basic interest rate lowered from its present level of 4.25 - 4.50 per cent and has been putting pressure on the Federal Reserve Bank. The Fed wants to reduce the base rate after inflation comes down to 2 per cent from its present 2.9 per cent and has kept the pause in rate hike for the present. President Trump, livid with anger, has fumed against the Fed chairman and may be plotting for his removal.

The abrupt and global reciprocal tariff imposed by Trump administration on 60 countries on April 2, from tiny Madagascar to economic giants like China and European Union (EU,) has brought sharp response from leaders of most of the major economies. In response, China has slapped 34 per cent retaliatory tariff in addition to the existing 20 per cent on all American exports to China. EU is likely to respond with tit for tat tariff soon.

Together with the domestic economic policy decisions, the backlash of the new tariff will fuel recessionary pressure in the American economy. It is estimated that the cumulative effect of the policy decisions on American economy will result in 2.5 per cent less growth in GDP. The global economy is now in the same stage as it was in the decade of '30s of last century when tariff war led to recession in all the industrialised countries. The IMF has made the forecast that as a result of the widespread tariff imposed by president Trump, the global economy faces 'significant risk'.

If president Trump's economic policies are full of dire consequences, both for middle and working class Americans and people belonging to those classes in other countries, his foreign policy harks back to the days of imperialism, gunboat diplomacy and world wars, all wrapped together. His penchant for deal making with a big stick may prove to be disastrous for global peace and security, unless held in check domestically or internationally.

Soon after assuming office president Trump declared that he would like to take over Panama Canal and Greenland from their present administration by the governments of Panama and Denmark. The whole world was in awe and amazement hearing this declaration of intent by the leading light of democracy. Ignoring disbelief and shock by the whole world president Trump sent his secretary of state to Panama and vice president to Greenland to press home the policy of taking over. The Panama government has seemed to placate the Trump administration after agreeing to replace the ownership of Chinese companies managing the canal with Blackstone, an American investment company. In Greenland, the idea of ownership by America has been seen as tantamount to a blatant aggression and roundly condemned by Denmark and the people of Greenland.

In respect of Gaza, the Palestinian strip in middle-east under Israeli occupation undergoing genocide for over one year, the policy announced by president Trump envisages it being taken over by America and developed as a Mediterranean Riviera, with the Palestinians relocated in other countries. The ruthlessness embedded in this idea has come as a shock to world leaders and peace loving people everywhere. The cruelty and greed revealed in this policy declaration has shown president Trump as a person obsessed with the spirit of aggrandizement and hate even when it may spell catastrophe for a nation or the people of the whole world, including the average citizens of America. His latest move into foreign affairs in pursuance of narrow geo-political interests in the middle- east may prove to be the most dangerous, leading to world war three. In presenting Iran a choice to make a deal on its nuclear program or else be bombed by America, president Trump has thrown diplomacy of mutual respect by the window. His sabre- rattling over Iran's nuclear programme may turn out to be the most dangerous and consequential policy declaration for world peace since the second world war.

By his words and deeds during the first quarter of his term president Trump has left no doubt that he is a megalomaniac and a warmonger who can only cause pain and suffering to the vast majority of the peace loving people in the world, including America. He is a clear and present danger to the world and has to be stopped in his tracks by populist protests and warnings by world leaders.

Trump is the face of all evils, the like of which the world saw only a few times in the past. As in the case of past monsters, Donald Trump has to be defeated.​

 

[Saif]

Vietnam to buy US defence, security products to tackle trade gap

Vietnam will buy more American goods, including defence and security products, and has asked for a 45-day delay in the imposition of US tariffs, Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh said in a statement issued late on Monday. Hanoi will also seek faster deliveries of commercial planes that Vietnamese air

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Vietnam to buy US defence, security products to tackle trade gap
REUTERS
Published :
Apr 08, 2025 13:47
Updated :
Apr 08, 2025 13:47

Vietnam will buy more American goods, including defence and security products, and has asked for a 45-day delay in the imposition of US tariffs, Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh said in a statement issued late on Monday.

Hanoi will also seek faster deliveries of commercial planes that Vietnamese airlines have ordered from the US, Chinh said at a cabinet meeting late on Monday.

The Southeast Asian country, a major regional manufacturing base for many Western companies, last year had a trade surplus of more than $123 billion with the US, its largest export market.

Chinh said Vietnam had asked the US to delay the 46% tariff rate that US President Donald Trump announced last week to allow time for negotiations.

Vietnam was seeking to "negotiate with the US side for balanced and sustainable trade, in line with the interests of the two sides," the statement said.

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro highlighted major concerns on Monday, including transhipping from China, the dumping of seafood and other goods, and intellectual property issues.

"They engage in intellectual property theft," Navarro told CNBC, regarding Vietnam. "They have the biggest number of cases aside from China at the Department of Commerce on the dumping."

In Monday's statement, Chinh said Vietnam would review issues such as its monetary policy, exchange rate, non-tariff barriers and ensuring the correct origin of goods, in line with the concerns aired by Navarro.

In a statement on Tuesday, following a tariff task force meeting, the government said Vietnam was also considering adjustments to its current bilateral trade agreement with the United States, adding content on tax and intellectual property.

The country's benchmark stock index .VNI has fallen nearly 14% since Trump's announcement of the tariffs on Apr 2. The index fell 6.26% to 1,135 in early trade on Tuesday.

On Friday, Trump and Vietnam's leader To Lam agreed to discuss a deal to remove tariffs, both leaders said after a telephone call that Trump described as "very productive".

Since an arms embargo was lifted in 2016, US defence exports to Vietnam have been largely limited to coastguard ships and trainer aircraft.

Last year sources said there were talks on sales of Lockheed Martin C-130 Hercules military transport planes to Hanoi.​

 

[Saif]

Crisis of democracy in America

Global perceptions of America as a democratic country have deteriorated across the world over the past year and are now worse than views on China in the same respect, according to an annual study of perceptions of democracy published in the first week of May this year. The survey did not go into de

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Crisis of democracy in America

Hasnat Abdul Hye
Published :
May 28, 2025 00:04
Updated :
May 28, 2025 00:04

Global perceptions of America as a democratic country have deteriorated across the world over the past year and are now worse than views on China in the same respect, according to an annual study of perceptions of democracy published in the first week of May this year. The survey did not go into details on the criteria used, but the Alliance of Democracies Foundation (ADF) which commissioned it said its aim was to defend and promote democratic values. When asked why perceptions of America as a democratic country had slipped, the Alliance founder and former NATO secretary general, Anders Rasmussen mentioned the trade war, mistreatment of Ukraine president Zelensky during his visit to White House and letting down allies on trade and security issues by the present American administration. "It is no surprise that opinions have slipped even among people like me who spent years admiring the United States and what it stood for," he said when asked to explain the findings of the survey. These comments, strictly speaking, are not indicators of the practice of democracy, nor do they explain the causes behind the decisions taken. Perceptions are not based on facts but there are random anecdotal evidences within a given timeframe that lead to them. Before mentioning and analysing these evidences in a broader context, a brief summary of the ADF survey findings may be helpful.

First, the size of the sample used by the survey to arrive at the conclusions is worth mentioning. It is seen that the survey, conducted between April 9 and 23 with polling firm NIRA Data, were based on more than 111,000 respondents worldwide (100 countries). Though the number of countries in the sample appears satisfactory, the same cannot be said about the respondents in the absence of data regarding their nationality, age, gender, educational qualifications and professions. In the survey, the perception of Trump was negative in 82 of the 100 countries surveyed, higher than Russian president Vladimir Putin and Chinese president Xi Jinping, who were viewed negatively in 61 and 44 countries, respectively. The use of heads of states in a survey designed to formulate perception of democracy appears problematic, even misleading because the assessment on the status of democracy has to be based on practice where institutions and their functioning's more important than personalities. Institutions in Russia and China are amenable to authoritarian rule, whereas in America, these are ostensibly suited to democracy. By this metrics alone, in any survey on democracy the inclusion of Russia and China is erroneous and irrelevant.

With this caveat, the main findings of the 2025 survey of the Alliance for Democracies can be summarised before moving on to more substantive issues on the state of democracy in America.

The survey has ranked the perception of countries within a scale from -(minus) 100 per cent to + (plus) 100 per cent. According to the survey, the net perception rating of America as a democracy fell to -5 per cent from +22 per cent last year, indicating a greater number of respondents with a negative view of the country compared with those with a positive view. The share of countries with a positive image of America (as a democracy) dropped to 45 per cent from 76 per cent last year, the survey has showed. These findings, in the absence of use of indicators and basis of evaluation, are not very persuasive.

A more relevant survey on the state of democracy worldwide, America included, is the annual survey by the Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU). According to the Democracy Index for 2024 prepared by EIU, only 45 per cent of the world's population lives in full democracy, 15 per cent in hybrid regimes and 39 per cent in authoritarian regimes. The Democracy Index prepared by EIU is based on 60 indicators, grouped into five categories: (a) electoral process and pluralism; (b) functioning of government; (c) political participation; (d) political culture and (e) civil liberties. Countries are scored from zero to ten in five categories with the overall index rating being a simple average of the five categories mentioned. Based on their average score, each country is classified as one of the four types of regimes: (1) full democracies (2) flawed democracies (3) hybrid regimes and (4) authoritarian regimes.

The Democracy Index report for 2024 showed America as a 'flawed democracy', the same status as shown for the year in 2018, implying there has been no improvement in the substance of democracy in America, during the five year period of 2018-2025. It will be interesting to see where America is placed in the Democracy Index after the performance of the Trump Administration in various areas of policy decisions and legislations. If during the five year period, between 2018 and 2024, that included parts of both Trump and Biden Administration, on the basis of the five categories of indicators, America was classified into the second category i.e. 'flawed democracy', the performance trending during first five months of the second term of president Trump may qualify the country for a lower status in the democracy scale, perhaps showing it somewhere between hybrid and authoritarian regimes.

Though American politicians never tire of grandstanding for American democracy as the epitome of the model, the reality on the ground have belied that claim with variations in respect of degree under different presidencies. The fundamental principles of separation of powers (ensuring accountability of elected and appointed authorities), liberty and equality enshrined in American constitution have never been fully observed in the history of the republic. It is not only recently when the country, under the stewardship of a maverick president, that American practice of democracy has been examined by analysts and found to fall short in some or all of the above salient respects. The critique of American brand of democracy, particularly its manifestations in established political institutions, is as old as the republic. President Trump, in his second term, has already widened this divergence between the requirements of democratic dispensation as enshrined in the constitution and actual practice.

Firstly, Trump administration has severely undermined the constitutional obligation of ensuring civil liberty by denying allegedly undocumented immigrants due process of law. Not only some immigrants have been denied access to courts of law to defend themselves, they have been treated inhumanely and sent to notorious prisons in third countries. Likewise federal funds for universities have been withheld without giving them any chance to plead their case, thereby hurting collective liberty. Secondly, in several cases court verdicts against executive orders of the president have been cynically ignored, violating the separation of powers. Even the supreme court judges have been threatened with action in the event of their dissenting rulings against executive orders given by the president. This disregard, nay contempt, of judiciary, the guardian of civil liberty, has never been so blatant as it has been recently. As if to drive home the superiority of the executive branch over judiciary, a federal judge in Minnesota was arrested from the precincts of the court last month on dubious charges of giving protection to illegal immigrants. Secondly, the requirements of legislative approval for cutting off of federal funding from and winding up of government agencies have been brushed aside, striking at the root of separation of power enshrined in the constitution.

If civil liberty and separation of power have been treated shabbily by the Trump administration, the constitutional principle of ensuring equality has not fared any better. The official negation of the principle of Diversification, Equality and Inclusiveness (DEI) has practically closed all avenues for equitable access to education, sports and employment by the physically and socially handicapped and groups other than the two genders. Thirdly, the complicity of legislature with the executive is also at work now, undermining the principle of equality. The tax cut proposal of the Trump administration benefitting the rich at the cost of classes below them in the income ladder has been passed by the Republican- majority House of Representatives recently. If the trends set in motion during the first five months become the norm for the Trump administration, the state of democracy in America can be said to be in suspended animation. By the metrics of EIU for preparation of Democracy Index, on the basis of prevailing decision- making, America can very plausibly be placed in the category of 'authoritarian regimes.'

The question is: why is democracy endangered now or exposed to weakening, in spite of provisions in the constitution for separation of powers, civil liberty and equity? There are mainly two reasons for the subversion of democratic procedure of governance in America. The first is the limitation on the legislative power of Congress to thwart the unconstitutional decisions of the president. This limitation becomes manifest when in both houses of the Congress the party of the president has a majority, as is the case now. The only legal deterrent against an errant president being impeachment by the legislature, this is not plausible when his party has the majority in both houses. The separation of powers, crafted so carefully and assiduously by the founding fathers of the American republic to restrain untrammelled powers of the executive branch (president) has been rendered vulnerable and dicey because of this reality. Only an amendment of the constitution, allowing a lower number of majority votes, can get around this constitutional impasse. But it is highly unlikely that any party enjoying majority in both houses of Congress will be inclined to consider this amendment seriously.

The second factor holding democracy as a hostage is the pervasive presence and round the clock public relationing by numerous lobbies that influence legislation and executive orders of the president. In almost all cases, the lobbies represent the classes or groups, including foreign powers that have deep pockets to spend. This is a source of not only political corruption but also of unequal power in American society to influence legislation and decision-making by the executive. In both respects, the democratic ethos becomes a victim.

Only a dispassionate bi-partisan review of the lacunae in the legal provisions for checks and balances in the exercise power leading to necessary amendments can extricate America from the ever present paralysis facing democracy. The proverbial sixty five thousand dollar question is: do the American politicians worry about this seriously to bring about qualitative change in the practice of democracy? More pertinently, is the American public aware about the swindling by their representatives and ready to launch a country- wide movement for the establishment of genuine democracy?​

 

[Saif]

In row with Trump, Musk says will end critical US spaceship programme

SpaceX chief Elon Musk said Thursday he would begin "decommissioning" his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts

en.prothomalo.com

In row with Trump, Musk says will end critical US spaceship programme
AFP Washington, USA
Published: 06 Jun 2025, 09: 05

In this file photo taken on 10 February, 2022 Elon Musk gestures as he speaks during a press conference at SpaceX's Starbase facility near Boca Chica Village in South Texas. Twitter owner Elon Musk on 17 March, 2023 put out word that he will make public the long-secret algorithm for recommending tweets. The code used for recommending the posts suggested to users will become "open source" at the end of March, Musk said in a tweet of his own. AFP

SpaceX chief Elon Musk said Thursday he would begin "decommissioning" his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station -- after US President Donald Trump threatened to terminate his government contracts.

"In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately," Musk wrote on X.

The comments -- which the mercurial billionaire later appeared to walk back -- came after Trump and Musk's nearly year-long political alliance imploded in spectacular fashion, with the two trading public insults on social media.

SpaceX's Crew Dragon -- a gumdrop-shaped capsule that flies atop a Falcon 9 rocket and splashes down in the ocean -- is currently the only US spacecraft certified to carry crew to the ISS under a contract worth more than $4.9 billion.

A variant, Cargo Dragon, delivers supplies, as the name suggests.

Following Musk's announcement, NASA spokeswoman Bethany Stevens said on X that the government space agency would "continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space."

"We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met," she said.

NASA had hoped to certify Boeing's Starliner for crewed missions, but that program has faced severe delays.

Its most recent test flight last year ended in failure after the spacecraft experienced propulsion issues en route to the orbital lab with its first astronaut crew.

The Starliner ultimately returned to Earth empty, while the two astronauts were brought home by SpaceX earlier this year.

Crew Dragon's certification in 2020 ended nearly a decade of US reliance on Russian Soyuz rockets to transport astronauts following the retirement of the Space Shuttle program in 2011.

American astronauts still fly aboard Soyuz rockets, while Russian cosmonauts ride on Crew Dragons under a longstanding seat-swap agreement.

In addition to NASA missions, Crew Dragon also flies private missions -- most recently Fram2, which carried tourists over the Earth's poles.

The next scheduled crew launch is Tuesday's Axiom-4 mission, which will see a Crew Dragon transport astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary to the ISS.​

 

[Saif]

Trump deploys military in LA to quell anti-immigration protests

About a dozen National Guard members were seen in video footage on Sunday morning lining up at a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, where detainees from immigration raids on Friday were taken, sparking protests that continued on Saturday.

www.thedailystar.net

Trump deploys military in LA to quell anti-immigration protests

Members of the California National Guard stand outside the Edward R Roybal federal building after their deployment by US President Donald Trump, in response to protests against immigration sweeps, in Los Angeles, California, US on June 8, 2025. Reuters/Mike Blake

California National Guard arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday, deployed by President Donald Trump after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids carried out as part of Trump's hardline policy.

About a dozen National Guard members were seen in video footage on Sunday morning lining up at a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, where detainees from immigration raids on Friday were taken, sparking protests that continued on Saturday.

The complex is near Los Angeles City Hall, where another protest against the immigration raids is scheduled for Sunday afternoon. U.S. Northern Command confirmed National Guard troops had started deploying and that some were already on the ground.

"These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform early on Sunday.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused Trump of deploying the National Guard because he wants "a spectacle."

Footage showed at least a half dozen military-style vehicles and riot shields on Sunday at the federal building where the Department of Homeland Security said about "1,000 rioters" had protested on Friday. Reuters could not verify the DHS account.

On Saturday law enforcement faced off against a few hundred protesters in Paramount in southeast Los Angeles and then later on Saturday with about 100 people in downtown Los Angeles, according to Reuters witnesses. Federal law enforcement was seen firing gas canisters in Paramount and downtown Los Angeles on Saturday to try and disperse protesters.

The Los Angeles Police Department arrested 27 people on Saturday for failure to disperse from the downtown protest, police spokesperson Norma Eisenman said. She said she could not comment on whether LAPD used less lethal force. Less lethal force refers to crowd control tactics such as pepper balls.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department arrested three people on Saturday on suspicion of assaulting an officer. Sheriff's deputies did use "less lethal force" in Paramount, spokesperson Deputy Brenda Serna said, but she could not specify which exact tactics were used.

'ZERO TOLERANCE'

The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant part of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made an immigration crackdown a hallmark of his second term.

Trump in a presidential memorandum on Saturday said he was deploying at least 2,000 National Guard personnel following what he described as "numerous incidents of violence and disorder" in response to the enforcement of federal immigration law, as well as "credible threats of continued violence."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also warned that the Pentagon was prepared to mobilize active-duty troops "if violence continues" in Los Angeles, saying the Marines at nearby Camp Pendleton were "on high alert."

"There is plenty of room for peaceful protest, but ZERO tolerance for attacking federal agents who are doing their job. The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE," Hegseth said in a social media post on Sunday, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Democratic Congresswoman Nanette Barragan, whose California district includes Paramount, on Sunday criticized the president's decision to deploy National Guard troops, arguing that local law enforcement has adequate resources to respond.

"We don't need the help. This is him escalating it, causing tensions to rise. It's only going to make things worse in a situation where people are already angry over immigration enforcement," Barragan told CNN's "State of the Union."

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday that the National Guard would provide safety around buildings, to people engaged in peaceful protest and to law enforcement.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in Los Angeles on Friday arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations.

Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day.

But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges.​