[🇧🇩] Iran, US- Israel War: It's Impact On Bangladesh

[🇧🇩] Iran, US- Israel War: It's Impact On Bangladesh
54
721
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Bangladesh economy caught in the crossfire

Govt must fix fragile economy to weather shockwaves from Middle East

1775782726196.webp

VISUAL: STAR

The economic shockwaves from the Iran war are rippling far beyond the Middle East. Heavily dependent on the Gulf for energy and sustained by remittances from the same region, Bangladesh remains particularly exposed, and a new World Bank assessment warns that this external shock could amplify our existing vulnerabilities, slowing growth, fuelling inflation, and pushing thousands back into poverty.

The growth outlook has already dimmed. Real GDP expansion, previously downgraded to 4.6 percent for the current fiscal year, is now projected to fall further to 3.9 percent. For an economy that needs momentum after three consecutive years of rising poverty, this is a serious setback. An estimated 12 lakh people who were expected to move out of poverty will now remain trapped, while about 600,000 jobs risk disappearing altogether.

Bangladesh imports 60-65 percent of its crude oil from the Gulf and also sources up to 75 percent of its LNG from the region, primarily Qatar. As energy prices climb, the import bill swells, widening the trade deficit and putting pressure on the taka. These costs ripple quickly through the economy, raising the price of transport, food production, and industrial output. Inflation, already elevated, is likely to gather further pace, hitting the poorest households hardest. At the same time, a second pressure point looms: remittances. Millions of Bangladeshi workers are now employed in economies that are themselves vulnerable to prolonged instability. If hiring slows or wages weaken, the impact will be felt directly in Bangladesh’s villages and towns. The flow of remittances could begin to thin.

What makes this moment more precarious is the condition of the domestic economy. Bangladesh is entering this external storm with structural weaknesses already exposed. The new government has inherited tight fiscal space, a fragile banking system, and persistently weak revenue mobilisation. These constraints leave little room to absorb additional shocks.

Higher global energy prices will inevitably deepen fiscal pressures. Subsidy requirements for power, gas, and fertiliser are set to rise sharply. If domestic prices are not adjusted, subsidy spending could climb to 2.8 percent of GDP in FY26 from 2 percent now, crowding out investment in health and education and forcing the government to depend more on borrowing. In an already constrained financing environment, that path is risky. Public debt, if left unchecked, is projected to exceed 45 percent of GDP by FY28.

The policy response, therefore, cannot be timid. The central bank must resist the temptation to rely on unsterilised money creation to prop up weak banks and instead maintain a firm monetary stance to contain inflation. At the same time, relief measures should be carefully targeted, reducing import duties on essential food items and expanding safety nets for the most vulnerable households. The authorities must also move on long-delayed reforms. Energy subsidies need to be gradually rationalised to ease fiscal pressure. Tax policy and administration must be overhauled to broaden the revenue base and reduce dependence on domestic borrowing. Without these steps, short-term firefighting will only deepen long-term fragility. If the government is to withstand the current turbulence and return to a path of inclusive growth, decisive reform is urgent.​
 

Managing the crisis thru unity

Tanim Asjad

Published :
Apr 10, 2026 23:16
Updated :
Apr 10, 2026 23:16

1775868650425.webp

A vigilance team seized some drums of fuel, stored illegally at a hidden place in Sylhet last month —Agency Photo

Bangladesh is facing a major crisis due to the ongoing war in the Middle East, which has disrupted the oil supply chain and driven up prices. Despite temporary ceasefire, the oil shock will make the already vulnerable economic conditions more fragile. It will be truly challenging for the government to address the socio-economic disturbances in the coming days. At such a critical juncture, elected lawmakers are expected to join hands as a gesture of unity to inspire citizens. Unfortunately, there is no sign of progress so far.

Though the government has taken several austerity measures to address the looming crisis, it has not yet invited other political parties for consultation. The opposition parties are also not showing interest in overcoming the crisis by offering suitable suggestions. It might appear to many that neither the government nor the opposition is serious about addressing the socio-economic crisis, which has the potential to intensify in the coming days.

Instead, the government seems to delegitimise the referendum verdict, which was validated by around 70 per cent 'Yes' votes. The referendum was framed as consent to implement various constitutional reform measures under the July National Charter. Opposition parties, however, are pressing to adopt the proposed reforms by amending the constitution. The two sides are now fighting over the referendum verdict as if there are no other problems in the country.

As the government's immediate task is to address the energy crisis stemming from the Iran war, it has a valid argument to suspend talks on the referendum and constitutional reforms for now. It may also seek cooperation of the opposition in Parliament by setting a clear deadline. However, any attempt to ignore the people's verdict is unfortunate and illegitimate.

The government is moving to scrap various ordinances issued by the Yunus-led interim government to implement comprehensive reforms across the fiscal, judicial, and administrative spheres. A special committee of the National Parliament recommended approving 113 ordinances, but suggested ignoring four and not immediately presenting 16 as bills in the house. These 16 ordinances will be re-examined and revised before introduction as new bills. As a result, the effectiveness of 20 ordinances ended after April 10.

The ordinances related to the appointment of Supreme Court judges and the establishment of the Supreme Court Secretariat were nullified in parliament last week. Moreover, the fate of 16 ordinances, including those related to the National Human Rights Commission, the prevention of enforced disappearances, strengthening the Anti-Corruption Commission, and the separation of fiscal policy and fiscal management, will be determined later.

These moves send wrong signal to people. Civil society organisations and rights activists have already protested the government's decision. By scrapping the Supreme Court-related ordinances, the government shows its unwillingness to make the judicial system more efficient and seeks to maintain political influence over judiciary, as did the ousted Hasina regime. Instead of scrapping the ordinances now, the government might re-examine them. Deferring 16 ordinances puts the fate of necessary institutional reforms into uncertainty. As the government has the right to re-examine these ordinances thoroughly, it needs to make a clear statement on this.

Reform of the judiciary and administration are tough tasks, as the vested political-bureaucratic nexus seeks to keep the existing system intact. After winning the 9th parliamentary election in December 2008, the Awami League government quickly scrapped some reform measures introduced by the army-backed caretaker government. For instance, the Better Business Forum (BBF) and Regulatory Reforms Commission (RRC), formed by the caretaker government, were abolished by the Hasina government in 2009. A similar trend is visible now.

Be it constitutional reform or energy crisis, the country now needs unified efforts to address it for the greater interest of the nation. As the country has started a new journey after the July uprising, which was marked by bloodshed and intimidation and a series of chaos and mob violence in the post-July period, there is an opportunity to advance the nation by building unity with diversity.​
 

US likely to extend Russian oil waiver to temper Iran war shock

REUTERS
Published :
Apr 11, 2026 20:30
Updated :
Apr 11, 2026 20:30

1775954002523.webp

US President Donald Trump's administration is likely to extend as soon as Friday a waiver allowing countries to buy some sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The US Treasury Department has allowed purchases of Russian oil and products at sea since mid-March with a 30-day waiver that expires on Apr 11, part of efforts to control global energy prices during the US-Israeli war with Iran.

Russia's presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev had said the original waiver would free 100 million barrels of Russian crude, equal to almost a day's worth of global output.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met with Trump in the White House on Thursday to talk about extending the waiver, and they agreed it was a good idea, one of the sources said, asking not to be named.

Officials at the White House and Treasury Department did not immediately comment on the matter.

Oil prices LCOc1 have spiked since the start of the war due to the partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20 percent of the world's oil and gas had been shipped daily before the conflict. The war is creating the biggest oil supply disruption in history, the 32-nation International Energy Agency has said.

Rising fuel prices are a major concern for Trump and his Republican party leading into midterm elections in November.

The waivers have been criticized by politicians at home and abroad as they could complicate the West's efforts to deprive Russia of revenue for its war in Ukraine and put Washington at odds with its allies.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has said now is not the time to relax sanctions against Russia.

Congressional Backlash

The US also waived sanctions on Iranian oil at sea on Mar 20 for 30 days, in an effort to control prices, spurring criticism from lawmakers from both political parties.

"Waiving oil sanctions now advantages the countries that wish to do us harm," Republican Senator Jerry Moran said last month, as he urged the administration to not renew the waivers. "Iran and Russia are actively working together to place Americans and other innocent lives at risk."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and fellow Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen urged the administration on Friday not to renew the license on Russian oil. “It remains far from clear that the extraordinary step of providing sanctions relief to Russia provided any relief for US consumers or eased the global energy crisis," they said in a statement.

"Instead, even as Russia supported Iran in targeting Americans, the Trump Administration has rewarded the Kremlin while Russia has continued to launch strikes at Ukraine—including a barrage of 1,000 strikes in late March," they said.

India, a US ally vulnerable to fuel shocks resulting from the war, has expected Washington to renew the waiver on Russian oil.​
 

Stranded Bangladeshi ships to cross Strait of Hormuz very soon: Iran envoy

UNB
Published :
Apr 12, 2026 20:56
Updated :
Apr 12, 2026 20:56

1776039393717.webp


Iranian Ambassador to Bangladesh Jalil Rahimi Jahanabadi on Sunday said many ships are waiting in the Strait of Hormuz due to the war situation, and said he was hopeful that they will be able to cross the Strait ‘very soon’.

“Some Bangladeshi ships are also stuck in the Strait of Hormuz. We will cooperate with Bangladesh. We will make arrangements for the release of Bangladeshi ships. The ships will be able to cross the Strait of Hormuz very soon. We will take action in this regard after talking to the Bangladesh government,” said the Ambassador.

The Iranian Ambassador made the remarks while speaking as the chief guest at an anti-war crimes exhibition titled 'Remembering the Martyred Students of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Demanding Justice and Accountability for US-Israeli War Crimes' organized by the Revolutionary Students' Council at Dhaka University on Sunday.

The Ambassador said the relations between Bangladesh and Iran are good and they consider Bangladesh as a brotherly country. “We have no enmity with Bangladesh.”

Regarding the Pakistan-mediated talks between Iran and the United States, the Ambassador thanked Pakistan for arranging the talks, according to a media release.

“At the same time, I thank those who have cooperated with us, including Oman."​
 

War shock may drain $6b from reserves: BB

Inflation may rise to 11.7pc, it projects

Staff Correspondent 13 April, 2026, 00:37

1776043491804.webp

New Age file photo

Bangladesh faces a sharp escalation in inflation and foreign exchange pressure due to the Middle East war, with risks building across dollar market, reserves and external balance, according to the latest Bangladesh Bank assessment.

In its quarterly report for October-December 2025, the central bank used a structural vector autoregression model to simulate the impact of a severe geopolitical shock.

It projected that such a scenario could raise domestic inflation by nearly 2 percentage points and drain more than $6 billion from foreign exchange reserves by the end of 2026.

The report modelled a steep surge in global oil prices, assuming a 70-per cent increase in the first quarter of 2026 and a further 30-per cent rise in the following quarter, alongside a depreciation of the taka.

Under this combined shock, inflation is projected to climb from 9.6 per cent in early 2026 to 11.7 per cent by the end of the year, intensifying existing price pressures.

The Bangladesh Bank explained that exchange rate depreciation had an immediate impact on domestic prices by raising the cost of imports, including fuel, food and industrial inputs.

At the same time, higher oil prices gradually push up production and transport costs, feeding into broader inflation over several quarters.

The external sector faces equally strong pressure.

Gross foreign exchange reserves stood at $33.19 billion at the end of December 2025.

Under the simulated shock, reserves could fall to $26.06 billion by December 2026, a decline of $6.5 billion.

If the depreciation deepens further, reserves may drop to $24.24 billion, reflecting higher import payments and central bank intervention to stabilise the currency.

The report warned that the gains seen in recent months remained fragile.

The current account recorded a surplus of $476 million in the second quarter of FY26, supported by a 20 per cent rise in remittances to $8.68 billion.

However, the trade deficit widened to $5.8 billion, indicating underlying pressure from imports.

The Middle East conflict has already disrupted global energy and food supply chains.

Bangladesh’s dependence on imported fuel leaves it exposed to rising prices, while any disruption in Gulf labour markets could weaken remittance inflows, a key source of dollars.

Export earnings also remain vulnerable.

The readymade garment sector, which earned $9.75 billion in the second quarter, faces weaker demand from the United States and Europe amid global inflation and trade tensions.

The report outlined a policy dilemma.

If the government fully absorbs higher oil prices through subsidies, inflation may remain around 10.5 per cent, but fiscal costs could rise sharply.

Allowing partial pass-through would ease fiscal pressure but push inflation higher.

The Bangladesh Bank said that maintaining a contractionary monetary policy and allowing some exchange rate flexibility would be necessary to contain inflation and manage reserve losses.​
 

MV Banglar Joyjatra sets sail as Hormuz opens for commercial traffic

bdnews24.com

Published :
Apr 17, 2026 23:50
Updated :
Apr 17, 2026 23:54

1776470185138.webp


The Bangladesh-flagged vessel MV Banglar Joyjatra has set sail toward the Strait of Hormuz from the outer anchorage of Mina Saqr port in the United Arab Emirates, following an official announcement by Iran that the strategic waterway is fully open for commercial traffic.

The state-owned Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (BSC) confirmed that the vessel lifted anchor at approximately 9pm Bangladesh time on Friday.

Commodore Mahmudul Malek, managing director of BSC, said, "The ship is currently about 20 nautical miles from the Strait. We expect it to cross the passage tonight once final clearance is secured."

The vessel, carrying 37,000 tonnes of fertiliser, is en route to its next commercial destinations: Cape Town and Durban in South Africa.

The ship with 31 Bangladeshi crew members on board originally set sail from Saudi Arabia’s Ras Al Khair port on Apr 8, following a ceasefire, but was denied permission to enter the Strait.

Prior to that, the vessel attempted to depart from Jebel Ali port in the UAE but was forced to turn back by the UAE Coast Guard due to escalating regional hostilities following the US-Israel joint attacks on Iran.
The Joyjatra first entered Middle Eastern waters on Jan 26.

While stationed at Terminal 10 of Jebel Ali port in late February, the crew witnessed a drone attack on a nearby facility.

Just a day after docking, a missile struck an oil reservoir only 200 metres away from the ship, sparking a massive fire and leaving the crew in a state of constant anxiety.

"It felt like being trapped in a suffocating environment," one sailor remarked, describing the months spent watching missiles and drones streak across the sky while their departure was repeatedly delayed.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints.

Throughout the conflict, commercial shipping was virtually paralysed, forcing the Joyjatra to seek refuge in various territorial waters, including Sharjah, to wait for the passage to reopen.

Ship Captain Md Shafiqul Islam confirmed the vessel’s progress Friday night, saying: "We have lifted anchor and are steadily moving toward Hormuz."​
 

Global shocks: the economic impact

Hasnat Abdul Hye

Published :
Apr 19, 2026 00:46
Updated :
Apr 19, 2026 00:46

1776560337512.webp


It has become customary to disaggregate the impact of economic shocks on the global and national or regional economies. Needless to say that in broad terms the conclusions are the same in broad terms pointing to the same direction viz decline. While the world economy is the composite of all regional and country-wide developments, individual economies try to cope with the shock using their capacity for resilience. In the event, the world economy can do little on its own to change the emergent economic trends and depend on the performance of individual economies to make economic updates. Multi-lateral institutions like the world Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO) and regional institutions like Asian Development Bank (ADB), African Development Bank (AfDB), BRICS etc can step in to perk up the world economy and thereby help individual economies to recover from the adverse impact of the shocks. But if the economic shocks emanate from geopolitical developments, prompt and united decisions in multilateral institutions are most likely to bog down.

Five global shocks: In the 21st century five economic shocks have been generated, four of which are ‘man- made’ and one natural. The first is the financial crisis of 2006-07 that broke out in America and Europe due to undue exuberance in investment banking in America’s mortgage sector. It was not of global import and was managed by co-ordinated policy interventions by G- 7 countries. The second economic shock came with the Covid pandemic in 2020 and its impact was global, leaving no country untouched and immune from its fallout. It was both natural and man-made in so far as the dissemination of the virus was due to human negligence. It battered all the economies in varying degrees and subsequently adversely impacted on global economy by disrupting the supply chains and increasing costs of shipping. Many countries are still struggling to recover from the ravages of Covid pandemic, so deep and wide-spread has been its impact. Even before the recovery from Covid was complete the global economy was suddenly subjected to a man- made catastrophe, the Ukraine war. It immediately adversely impacted the supply of gas, oil, fertilizer, wheat and corn, increasing their prices. Individual economies are still reeling from the blows dealt out by the Covid and Ukraine war.

The fourth economic shock of this century is entirely man-made and done in a most arbitrary manner. By raising tariff sky-high across the board and slapping it on all countries almost overnight, the Trump administration made mincemeat of rule-based global trade and made economies of individual countries hostages to an ultra- nationalist policy of balancing trade accounts by neo-mercantilist America. The global economy and the individual economies are still in the process of adjustments (mostly in the form of concessions made to strong arm tactics of American demands) and is now faced with an economic catastrophe of most serious consequences, the preemptive war against Iran by America and Israel .

ImPact on GLOBAL ECONOMY: The six weeks war in Iran, now in the last phase of a tenuous ceasefire, can have more far reaching consequences than all previous shocks to which the global economy has been exposed. This is because the Gulf countries are sources of supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to both European and Asian countries. Damages to LNG sites in the Gulf reportedly are so severe that resumption of exports after the war ends will take up to one year. Longer the war wages greater will be the time lag between reconstruction of facilities and resumption of supplies. The Gulf countries also export fertiliser to Europe, Africa and Asian countries. It is estimated that up to 46 per cent of global traded urea fertiliser is linked to Gulf producers. The shortages of fertiliser caused by the war in Iran have already led to estimates that these may reduce food production by as much as 25 per cent this year. Apprehending this, food markets have already registered 5 per cent higher prices.

Iran has the third largest oil reserves in the world, next to Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. It exports 90 per cent of its oil to China which accounts for 11 per cent of latter’s total requirement. Disruptions in this supply will have some impact on China’s economic growth. Other importers of Iranian oil like India, Bangladesh and Myanmar will also face similar problem. Besides Iran, the Gulf countries supply about 20 per cent of global oil through the Strait of Hormuz. After the start of the Iran war this supply has stopped, compounding the crisis in the global energy market. Price per barrel of Brent crude oil shot to $ 120 in the first week of the war and is now hovering around $100. Volatility in energy markets has severely jolted all the economies of the world.

Increase in the price of oil has led to increases of prices of almost all commodities causing rise in cost of living. Inflation, brought under control in many countries through tight monetary policy over the past several years, has staged a comeback. This in turn has made it difficult for central banks to lower the policy rate, a situation that is not conducive for investment. Inflation and high interest rate has affected stock markets adversely with investors switching from stocks to treasury bills and bonds.

The cumulative effect of all the above has been reflected in a downgraded growth forecast for the world economy. For the current calendar year, the IMF has brought down the estimate for global growth from 4.0 per cent to 3.1 per cent. This is on the basis of the current state of the Iran war. If it prolongs and spreads out geographically, the growth prospect will worsen, requiring the rate to be further downgraded.

All global shocks do not affect every country to the same degree. Particularly vulnerable are the developing countries. While industrially developed countries have deep pockets or can borrow, developing countries can borrow only at the cost of inflation. Providing them with budgetary support in the form of soft loan can go a long way in helping them to cope with the economic shocks. The World Bank, the IMF and other multilateral institutions can play important roles in times of Economic crisis. This role becomes incumbent upon them once they update the economic outlook and downgrade growth estimates of individual countries..

Impact on regions: (A) The economic impact of the war launched by America and Israel been has been immediate and most extensive in Iran. Not only numerous military targets, including armament industries, have been destroyed by bombing, even civilian infrastructures like schools, hospitals, universities, scientific research facilities, bridges and rail tracks have not been spared. Donald Trump has publicly threatened to bomb Iran back to the stone age, a declaration unheard of from the head of a state before. According to Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) the country has already suffered a loss $22O billion as a result of bombings by America and Israel. In terms of loss of exports of oil, the estimated amount is about $276 million per day while total economic loss, including petrochemicals and knock-on effects is estimated to be $435 million dollars per day. If the war stops now it will take 10 years for Iran to complete reconstruction, costing between $300 to $400 billion, according to one estimate.

The oil and gas assets of Gulf countries and Saudi Arabia have been inflicted heavy damages by bombings by Iran as part of its asymmetric strategy. It is estimated that GDP of United Arab Emirate (UAE) and Saudi Arabia may decline by 3 and 5 per cent respectively. Kuwait and Qatar, on the other hand, will see greater decline in their GDP, by 14 per cent according to one estimate. Many of the Gulf countries are already facing economic recession as their tourism industry has collapsed after the war broke out. The investment climate in these countries has darkened as investors are retreating due to lack of trust and confidence. The greatest and long lasting damage suffered by the countries in the region, including Iran, will be environmental. As a result of bombings of oil refineries and gas fields toxic gas has already polluted air while chemicals (greenhouse gas amounting to 2000 million tons) used by American bombers have polluted surface water. It is suspected that uranium hexafluoride from Natanz nuclear enrichment facility may have polluted soil after bombing by America, making agriculture highly risky.

(B) The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has predicted the war in Iran is likely to drag on Asia’s economies over this year and next. It estimated the region’s growth at 5.1 per cent during this period. Growth predictions could fall to as low as 4.7 per cent for 2026 should the US-Israeli war with Iran drag on into the third quarter. ‘Most economies in developing Asia and Pacific will see their growth outlook worsen this year and in 2027’ has been the Bank’s stark assessment. The region’s status as a net energy importer left it particularly vulnerable to the wars’ fallout, said the ADB chief economist recently. Even after energy prices normalise, supply- chain disruptions, higher producer price and tighter financial conditions would prolong stagflationary pressures, he added. A more drawn-out conflict in the Middle-East could also see prices spike by as much as 5.6 per cent, the ADB report observed. Completed in March, the, Bank’s report had predicted price rise of 3.6 per cent in 2026 and 3.4 per cent in 2027 under what it described as ‘early stabilisation scenario’. The report noted that Iran’s squeeze on shipping route in the Strait of Hormuz, had ripple effects far beyond the gas pumps, including regional food security.

Bangladesh case: The World Bank has drawn a conservative economic outlook in its Bangladesh Economic Update released in the first week of April. it shows the country can grow at 3.9 per cent in the current fiscal for the compounding effects of the of the on-going Middle-East conflict and persistent domestic macroeconomic fragilities. But the ADB in its Asian Development Outlook (ADO) raises hopes that the on-going financial sector reforms aimed at enhancing stability, transparency and efficiency should support economic expansion. ADB’s ADO for April, 2026 says that following a period of recovery phase, GDP growth is expected to rise over the next two fiscal years. According to the ADO for April 2026, the country’s GDP is to grow 4.0 per cent in FY2026 and further accelerate to 4.7 per cent in FY2027, up from a sluggish 3.5 in FY2025. The ADB projection is too optimistic and does not chime with results of previous reform measures and growth performance. The World Bank estimate is more realistic, given our past experience.

According to newspaper report, the present government plans a big budget worth Tk 9.30 trillion for the next fiscal year for augmented funding of critically important sectors. In order to finance the substantially raised annual spending plan, the government has set a target to collect Tk 7.95 trillion as revenue in fiscal 2026-2027. (Financial Express, 13 April, 2026). Given the past record of public resource mobilisation one can safely conclude the government will have to resort to bank borrowing making the target of bringing down inflation to 7.9 per cent unrealistic. What is most glaring in these pre-budget deliberations is the absence of factoring in the Iran war in the sectors concerned and delineation of a plan action for each. The energy crisis created by the war is not only a problem of expanding subsidy to cushion the effects on consumers but also calls for support to producers, ranging from farmers to industrialists. A holistic study analysing the ramifications of the energy crisis is urgently called for. The next budget should focus on energy crisis and its ramifications in the economy.​
 

Latest Posts

Back