[🇧🇩] Forming Election Commission/Conducting Elections

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Forming Election Commission/Conducting Elections
211
4K
More threads by Saif


People to decide on polls, with or without reforms: Prof Yunus

In an interview with Al Jazeera, the chief adviser gives his take on key issues including the economy, ties with India, the US, Sheikh Hasina's extradition, minority rights and more.

Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus, in an interview with Al Jazeera, said his interim government is focusing on reforms of state institutions, but would announce elections anytime if people want it, with or without reforms.

Asked about when the election can take place, he said he has no definite answer to that.

Prof Yunus said his government simultaneously pushing reforms and preparing for an election. He said the student-led mass uprising has presented his government with the opportunity that no government in Bangladesh had: the mandate to change the ineffective old ways for a "New Bangladesh".

"New Bangladesh is not going to come through just holding an election. Holding an election is a repetition of the old ways of doing things in politics …. So we want to get rid of those things and that's what the population of the whole country wants. Something new, something different than the old. So that needs many things," he said referring to the reform initiatives his government has taken to bring about the changes in the key sectors like the judiciary, election commission, and even in the constitution.

However, he said the "election train" has already begun its journey and people will have the final say when the election will be held.

"And it's up to the people, up to the political parties to decide which way to go. …. And we'll keep asking the people of Bangladesh -- would you like to go to the election now or after these reforms are done?" he added.

"So it's all a question of what people want, the political parties want. If political parties say forget about it, give the election, we'll do it," the CA said, adding that his government "will not impose anything on the people".

Asked about how long the interim government can last, Prof Yunus said he has no idea about it either.

He said every government is interim as all have a certain tenure.

"The regular government lasts for 5 years. The new constitution [after reforms] may go for four years probably because people may want it. So, it should be under four years, that's for sure. It may be less," he said.

Asked if the interim government could stay for four years, Yunus said, "I didn't say that I'll be [here] for 4 years. I'm saying this is the term that maximum one can go. But that's not our intention. Our intention to get it done as quickly as possible."

When asked if he plans to stand for election, Yunus said, "I am not a politician. I enjoy my role, what I am doing at the last stage of my life. I'm not going to change that."

Ties with India and extradition of Sheikh Hasina

Asked about how his government is eyeing to resolve longstanding issues like water and resource sharing with India, Yunus said both countries need to work together to solve those.

"We have to work together … Bangladesh alone cannot solve these problems. We need collaboration, we need cooperation from India because all the sources of rivers are in India or passing through India," he said.

"We need to have a good water management system together. It cannot be done alone and I'm sure it can be done," he added.

Asked about how his administration take on the statements issued by Sheikh Hasina, the ousted prime minister, from India, the chief adviser said those are her attempts to destabilise the country, and India has a role to play here.

"You [India] are hosting her, that's fine. But please make sure that she doesn't create problems for us. Then we have to go back and complain to you that you are hosting something which is bad for us. We should be able to kind of resolve it amicably between India and Bangladesh," he said.

When mentioned that Hasina still claims to be the PM of Bangladesh, Dr Yunus said she can call herself many things but that's not what the reality is.

"Even India says she's an ex-prime minister. So, even her host is not recognising her as anything but an ex-prime minister," he added.

Asked if his government will be pushing for Hasina's extradition, he said, "Yes. Because there's a legal process going on and if she is found guilty, we'll ask for her repatriation."

Minority rights

Prof Yunus also refuted the claims that violence against minorities including Hindus has increased during his tenure. He said the violence that took place during the mass uprising was political, not religious.

He said the violence mostly targeted Awami League supporters and most of the Hindus happen to be their supporters.

"They were angry with the Awami League and those people who were attacked were active in the Awami League," he added.

Asked how he wants to bridge the divide, Prof Yunus said his government will ensure rights to every citizen.

When asked about the statement of US president-elect Donald Trump on the minority rights issues in Bangladesh ahead of the US election, the Nobel peace laureate said the reality on the ground is different.

"This is mostly propaganda … baseless propaganda. It's unfortunate [that] most of the propaganda originates from the Indian side for whatever reason. [They are doing this] maybe to keep this tension alive, probably. But in reality, it doesn't exist," he said, adding that Hindus have celebrated Durga Puja in thousands of puja mandaps without any hassle.

Ties with Trump and US

In the interview with the Qatar-based television network, Prof Yunus said he does not foresee any changes in US policy as Trump is taking office, adding that he has no personal issues with the president-elect or with the Republican Party.

"I had no interaction with president Trump in the past. So I had no problem with him in a personal way. … I have friends in the Democratic Party, I have friends in the republican party. It was the House which voted for Congressional gold medal for me," he said.

"I think the foreign policy of the United States is not something switches back and forth depending on who's the president there, said Prof Yunus.

When the host asked if he thinks the US will take a different stance towards the region after Trump takes power, Prof Yunus said, "I don't think so, absolutely no way."

Allegation of US meddling

Asked about Sheikh Hasina's allegation that the US played a part in her ouster, the chief adviser refuted the claim. He said the family of the ex-PM asked the help of the military to help her flee the country as people were about to invade her official residence.

"So, the Army helped her to … go to India and that's how it happened. It's not somebody instructing somebody, sending some army … it's not like that. [The change came through] this student movement which was joined by the entire population of the country," he added.

The Nobel peace laureate said he was not in the country when the AL government was ousted on August 5. Talking about the uncertainty that prevailed during that time, Prof Yunus said he was invited to head the interim government over a call and by the time he took oath, the country was without a government for three days.

Asked if he was surprised by how the events unfolded including the fleeing of Sheikh Hasina, Prof Yunus said not only him, but everyone was surprised by the sudden developments.

"She was so entrenched; nobody thought she was really [going to] run away," he said, adding that the mobilization against her was massive.

"That was something unheard of, something unplanned, and nobody knew that this would happen. The expectation was [that] something would happen because the whole country was against her. … But it happened."

Accepting the role of chief adviser

Asked how much consideration he gave after receiving the offer of heading the interim government, Yunus said he initially didn't want to get into politics. He said he told them to find somebody else to run the country.

He said he told them to call him a day after rethinking about the proposal

"So they called me the next day. They said we debated and discussed, you should take over. So we are waiting for you and you have to agree," the CA said.

"So, finally I said, look you have given lives for this and suffered so much for this. If you have done so much already, I will forget what I said before and I'll accept your invitation and I'll come back. So I came back," he added.

Bangladesh economy

Asked about Bangladesh's economy, Prof Yunus said he has inherited a "dysfunctional economy".

"Oh, it's terrible; the whole economy is in terrible shape. The previous government has taken so many big projects -- billions of dollars projects. The whole banking system is totally destroyed. Billions of dollars have been transferred from Bangladesh to her [Shekh Hasina] cronies and other people. So, it is in shambles," he said.

However, Yunus said he is optimistic as his government has received "tremendous support" from the world community.

"They very, very warmly supported us and that's what helped us," he said referring to the world organisations and governments. He said those helps have helped his government in putting the banking system back in shape and also in making big payments.

"We already made big payments without touching the reserve," he said, adding that those were made from the "current income".

Asked when people will get the benefits of such actions, he said the effects are already being felt by the people as they can rely on the financial system.

"Inflation is not going wild, our foreign exchange is not disappearing, and it is building up every month. So, the confidence is coming back," he said.​
 

Won’t allow AL in election before trial for mass killing: Sarjis
Staff Correspondent
Dhaka
Updated: 19 Nov 2024, 19: 20

1732067171710.png

Sarjis AlamCollected

The general secretary of July Shaheed Smrity Foundation, Sarjis Alam, has expressed a firm determination that they would not allow deposed Awami League in any election before they undergo a trial for mass killing.

“We will not let Awami League participate in any election before their trial for mass killing. If necessary, there will be a second uprising,” he wrote on his verified Facebook handle on Tuesday afternoon.

Earlier on the day, Hasnat Abdullah, a key coordinator of the anti-discrimination student movement, lambasted Awami League and the entities that are trying to rehabilitate them.

In a Facebook post, he said any desire to attain power by stepping on the youth’s blood and turning New Delhi into the qibla (direction of prayer or loyalty) means betraying the people’s aspiration for freedom.

“Those who will take initiatives to rehabilitate Awami League, history will identify them as public enemies,” he wrote.

He further said those who uphold the spirit of the July uprising and aim to represent the people’s aspirations must unequivocally demand trial for the Awami League in post-2024 Bangladesh, and there should be no different statements.

On the previous day, youth and sports adviser Asif Mahmud echoed similar sentiments while speaking at a discussion.

“When we, on behalf of the government, talk about banning the Awami League, political parties try to hinder the attempt through their speeches. As the Nazi Party was banned in Germany in 1945 and still remains so, it should be a precedent to understand the fate of the Awami League,” he said.​
 

Elected govt needed to revive economy
Says Pran-RFL Group chief Ahsan Khan Chowdhury

1732146461675.png


The sooner the country returns to a democratic process, the better it is for the economy, said top industrialist Ahsan Khan Chowdhury.

"Businesses will do better [under an elected government]," Ahsan Khan Chowdhury, chairman and chief executive director of PRAN-RFL Group, told The Daily Star in an interview recently.

Pran-RFL wants to invest and expand its business but the sprawling conglomerate, whose turnover is to the tune of Tk 30,000 crore, cannot do so without a stable political and economic environment.

"Because, the political and economic situation highly influences such plans. If there is hartal here today or worsening law and order, I cannot do anything even if I want."

Unrest among people will subside under a democratically elected government.

"If we can do so and create a mentality of constructive discussion, our country will advance fast," said Chowdhury, who employs about 145,000 people.

He urged policymakers to improve the law and order situation so that normal business and economic activities run smoothly.

Chowdhury, however, said the interim government must succeed if the country is to move forward.

If the law and order situation returns to normal, entrepreneurs will be able to pay attention to their businesses and focus on investment and job creation needed to rejuvenate the economy, which has been facing headwinds for more than two years because of depleting foreign exchange reserves and high inflation.

Businesspeople should not run after politics, according to Chowdhury, who looks after 32 factories in Bangladesh.

"Let's not waste our time on politics and let the politicians do their job. For me, my business is my politics. My politics is how I can make PRAN-RFL the best company in the world. But political and economic situations influence my decision to do so."

To encourage investment, the government should make rules and procedures easy for investors to comply with, he said, citing the cumbersome process to get trade licences from city corporations and factory and environmental clearance from agencies.

"We need to change our total mindset. We will reap no benefit of establishing a one-stop service window unless we ease the business processes."

Bangladesh is competing with India, Vietnam and Cambodia for foreign investment, so the country needs a competitive edge. So the one-stop service window must be made world-class.

"You see industrialisation is taking place in Dubai even though they do not have any comparative advantage. They have made the business processes so easy that investors from Africa and Europe are going there. But we are failing to attract investors."

Bangladesh can become the best place for business if the processes are eased.

"We can advance quickly if our political mindset, business mindset, and bureaucrats are aligned together."

Employment generation should be the topmost national agenda, Chowdhury said, adding that the PRAN-RFL Group aims to create 100,000 additional employment by investing in the labour-intensive sectors, especially those that would exit from China.

"We have seen that footwear, bag making, small electric appliances and home appliances will be forced to leave China. Our job will be to see how we can take that opportunity."

Chowdhury lauded the role of the banking sector in supporting entrepreneurs.

Organisations such as PRAN-RFL Group might not have grown were it not for the funding from banks.

"Our banking sector has given birth to many entrepreneurs. When we talk about the creation of oligarchs, we should also remember that numerous entrepreneurs have been created because of this sector."

In the '90s, no bank other than the then-Bangladesh Shilpa Bank would provide loans to the industrial sector. Today, every bank finances industries.

"I think PRAN-RFL is the discovery of Bangladesh's banking sector. We have grown and repaid loans timely. No bank in Bangladesh can say it has dues to the PRAN-RFL. We have borrowed, repaid on time; and sought more loans from the banks for doing business and not for buying cars, homes or to siphon money abroad."​
 

Election timetable: perspectives, challenges, & opportunities
Serajul I Bhuiyan
Published :
Nov 21, 2024 00:45
Updated :
Nov 21, 2024 00:45

1732151023503.png

Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus addresses the nation to mark his interim administration’s 100th day in office on November 17 Photo : Agency

Dr Muhammad Yunus, the globally renowned Nobel Laureate and the head of Bangladesh’s interim government, recently delivered a historic speech commemorating the first 100 days of his administration. At the heart of his address was the contentious issue of the nation’s election timetable, a critical topic that has become the centerpiece of political discourse and public debate in Bangladesh.

With the nation standing at a decisive juncture in its political history, Yunus’ speech has drawn widespread attention for offering a roadmap aimed at diffusing tensions, fostering political consensus, and ensuring the path to free and transparent elections. While his vision has earned praise for its foresight, it has also sparked scepticism and debate, revealing divergent reactions from political factions, civil society, and the general public.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Yunus’ speech, assessing its core themes, evaluating its strengths and weaknesses, and presenting actionable recommendations to navigate the complexities of this pivotal moment in Bangladesh’s democratic journey.

Key highlights of Yunus’ speech: Commitment to electoral integrity. Yunus emphasized the interim government’s dedication to ensuring free, fair, and inclusive elections. He stressed that credible elections necessitate institutional reforms to eliminate vulnerabilities that have marred past electoral processes.

Proposal for timelines. Yunus proposed linking the election timetable to the completion of critical reforms, ensuring that elections are not rushed at the expense of transparency and credibility.

Inclusivity and dialogue. Acknowledging the importance of collective decision-making, Yunus called for inclusive dialogue with political parties, civil society, and other stakeholders to achieve national consensus.

Focus on institutional reforms. His speech highlighted ongoing efforts to depoliticize key state institutions such as the Election Commission, judiciary, and law enforcement agencies, with the aim of creating a level playing field for all political actors.

Strengths of THE speech: Emphasis on electoral integrity. Yunus’ focus on linking the election timetable to critical reforms underscores his commitment to ensuring that elections are not merely procedural but genuinely democratic. This approach resonates with civil society’s demand for substantive changes before elections are held.

Promotion of national consensus. The call for inclusivity and dialogue reflects an understanding of the need for collective decision-making in a polarized political landscape. By inviting all parties to participate, he demonstrated a willingness to foster unity and collaboration.

Strategic vision for long-term stability. The speech presented a long-term perspective, recognizing the systemic issues that have undermined previous elections. Yunus’ emphasis on reforms seeks to establish a sustainable democratic framework that prevents a recurrence of past political crises.

Restoration of public trust. The focus on transparency and impartiality is likely to resonate with a public disillusioned by years of electoral controversies and authoritarian governance, offering hope for a more credible political process.

Shortcomings of the speech

Lack of specific timelines.
While Dr Yunus outlined broad reform objectives, the absence of specific deadlines or milestones left room for ambiguity, potentially undermining public confidence in the interim government’s intent and ability to deliver.

Insufficient emphasis on dialogue: Though he mentioned inclusivity, the speech lacked a concrete framework for engaging stakeholders in meaningful dialogue. A clearer roadmap for fostering consensus among political parties and civil society would have strengthened his vision.

Resistance from political parties. The speech did not adequately address the divergent positions of major political parties. For example, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) demands immediate elections, while Jamaat-e-Islami prioritizes reforms. These conflicting priorities require careful negotiation and compromise.

Public frustration with delays. A lack of tangible progress on key reforms risks alienating the public, particularly those eager for a return to normalcy through timely elections.

Public perspectives: To better understand public sentiment, a snap poll was conducted by this author with 50 respondents from diverse backgrounds, including professionals, students, civil society members, and the general public in Bangladesh and United States of America (USA). The survey captured a range of opinions on Dr Yunus’ speech and the broader political context. (See- Box)

Perspectives of political parties and civil society: Bangladesh’s political landscape is highly polarised, with significant divergence among key stakeholders regarding the election timetable and reform agenda. The views of major political parties, smaller parties, and civil society reflect varied priorities, ranging from immediate elections to comprehensive institutional reforms. Here is an expanded analysis of these perspectives:

Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)

Position.
The BNP has consistently maintained that immediate elections are imperative to restore democratic continuity. As the primary opposition party, the BNP believes that delaying elections undermines public confidence in governance and exacerbates political uncertainty.

Concerns. The BNP has expressed apprehension that a prolonged timeline for reforms might marginalize their political influence and allow the interim government to consolidate its power. This perception is particularly sensitive given the party’s recent history of strained participation in previous electoral processes. BNP leaders also fear that extended delays could diminish the urgency of addressing electoral irregularities and hinder their ability to mobilize grassroots support.

Recommendation. To address the BNP’s concerns, the interim government should establish a clear and binding election timetable with transparent milestones for reforms. This would reassure the BNP that the interim government is not attempting to extend its tenure indefinitely. Visible progress in reforming the Election Commission, updating voter rolls, and ensuring impartial law enforcement could help build trust and facilitate their participation in the democratic process.

Jamaat-e-Islami

Position.
Jamaat-e-Islami has advocated for reforms to take precedence over elections, emphasizing that without comprehensive changes, the electoral process risks repeating the same systemic flaws seen in previous elections. Their position reflects a cautious and methodical approach, prioritiaing the integrity of the process over its speed.

Concerns. Jamaat fears that a rushed election could compromise its credibility, perpetuating existing issues such as voter fraud, political interference, and biased administration. These concerns are particularly acute given the party’s diminished political leverage and historical challenges in contesting elections under fair conditions.

Recommendation. To address Jamaat’s reservations, the interim government should consider forming a bipartisan reform oversight committee. This body, comprising representatives from all major political parties, civil society, and independent experts, could monitor and evaluate the progress of reforms, ensuring transparency and inclusivity. By actively involving Jamaat in the reform process, the government can foster trust and demonstrate its commitment to creating a fair and level playing field for all political actors.

Smaller Parties and Civil Society

Position.
Smaller political parties and civil society groups generally support the interim government’s reform agenda. They view systemic reforms as critical to ensuring free and fair elections, and many have lauded Dr. Yunus’ emphasis on depoliticizing key institutions. However, they also stress the importance of inclusivity in the reform process to reflect the diverse interests of Bangladesh’s population.

Concerns. Smaller parties often fear being overshadowed by dominant political actors like the Awami League or BNP in shaping electoral policies. Civil society groups, meanwhile, are concerned about the lack of mechanisms to ensure that reforms are implemented transparently and equitably. These stakeholders worry that without meaningful engagement, their voices may be sidelined in the broader political discourse.

Recommendation. To address these concerns, the interim government should prioritise greater inclusivity and representation in decision-making processes. Establishing consultative forums where smaller parties and civil society organizations can actively contribute to discussions on reforms would enhance the legitimacy of the interim government’s efforts. Furthermore, ensuring proportional representation in electoral oversight committees can provide a platform for diverse perspectives and build consensus on critical issues.

Collective insights: The perspectives of political parties and civil society reveal the complexity of navigating Bangladesh’s political terrain. While the BNP demands urgency, Jamaat advocates caution, and smaller parties emphasize inclusivity, their shared concern is the credibility and transparency of the electoral process.

The interim government, under Dr. Yunus’ leadership, must strike a delicate balance by addressing these concerns while adhering to its reform agenda. Proactive communication, visible progress, and inclusive policymaking are essential to bridging these divides and fostering a unified path toward democratic restoration.

By engaging all stakeholders in constructive dialogue and demonstrating its commitment to credible reforms, the interim government has an opportunity to lay the foundation for a stronger, more inclusive democratic system in Bangladesh.

Public sentiments on Dr. Yunus’ leadership: Respondents widely praised Dr. Yunus for his integrity, global reputation, and commitment to reforms. Many view him as a transformative leader capable of addressing Bangladesh’s deep-seated political and institutional challenges. However, some expressed impatience with the interim government’s pace, emphasizing the need for tangible progress.

A general citizen remarked:

“Dr. Yunus is a leader of exceptional integrity. We believe in his vision, but the interim government must act faster to prove its commitment to meaningful reforms.”

This survey highlights a public deeply invested in the nation’s democratic future. While Dr. Yunus’ speech and interim government enjoy mixt support, citizens demand tangible progress and greater inclusivity in decision-making. Reform is necessary for a strong democracy and stop returning autocracy and fascism in the future. These insights underscore the importance of balancing immediate political pressures with the long-term need for systemic reform.

For many, the interim government’s inability to set definitive deadlines has heightened political uncertainty, leaving citizens anxious about the future. These individuals argue that immediate elections are necessary to restore a sense of normalcy and democratic continuity. They believe that delaying elections risks undermining public confidence in the interim government’s intent and credibility, as well as exacerbating social unrest in an already polarized environment.

A young entrepreneur from Dhaka shared, “The country cannot afford to remain in limbo. People need an elected government to address the economic challenges we are facing. Every day of delay makes things worse for ordinary citizens.”

A senior banker expressed concern over the persistent rise in commodity prices, noting that while the government is making efforts to control the situation, continued inflation could erode public support and trust in the administration. He also emphasized the need for prioritization, citing the agitation by Titumir College students demanding university status as an example of a non-urgent issue. ‘Such demands, while important in the long term, should not overshadow critical national priorities. The government must address these protests firmly to maintain focus on urgent and impactful reforms,’ he remarked.

A distinguished trustee board member of a leading private university remarked on Yunus’s unparalleled international stature, emphasising that his position provides a unique opportunity to bring those responsible for extrajudicial killings and disappearances to justice. “Dr. Yunus must be allowed to complete the tribunal process to ensure that these criminals face accountability. Political parties should exercise patience and support his efforts to reform the system and prosecute collaborators of the fascist regime,’ he stated. The trustee also reflected on Yunus’s personal sacrifices, noting, ‘He is perhaps losing more as Chief Advisor compared to his thriving international role in advancing social business and global thought leadership. Yet, his dedication to Bangladesh’s democratic and judicial reforms speaks volumes of his commitment to the nation.’

Recommendations for the way forward

Establish a binding timeline. Set specific deadlines for reforms and elections to build public confidence and counter accusations of delay tactics.

Foster inclusive dialogue. Engage all stakeholders — including political parties, civil society, and marginalized groups — in a structured dialogue to build consensus and ensure reforms reflect diverse perspectives.

Demonstrate tangible progress. Implement quick wins, such as restructuring the Election Commission and depoliticizing law enforcement, to signal sincerity and build momentum.

Enhance public communication. Provide regular updates on reform progress through transparent and accessible channels, maintaining public trust and engagement. A proactive and dynamic press secretary is needed at this moment to communicate government messages on reforms and actions, steps on different sectors.

Leverage Technology for Transparency. Utilise digital tools for voter registration, election monitoring, and public feedback to enhance transparency and reduce inefficiencies.

Involve international experts. Seek neutral international organizations to mediate political disagreements and lend credibility to the reform process.

Reshuffle advisors. A prevailing perception among the public is that while several advisors within the interim government are well-meaning individuals and experts in their respective fields, they are not meeting the expectations required for ministerial responsibilities. To address this, there is a growing call for replacing underperforming advisors with individuals who embody youthful energy, dynamism, and a fresh perspective.

The ideal replacements should not be drawn from NGO backgrounds, nor should they be long-retired loyalists or individuals affiliated with previous governments. Instead, the focus should be on appointing capable professionals who can bring innovative solutions and a non-partisan approach to the government’s reform agenda. This reshuffle would strengthen public confidence in the interim administration and inject much-needed vigor into its operations.

A pivotal moment for Bangladesh: Yunus’ speech marks a critical turning point in Bangladesh’s democratic journey. While his vision reflects a thoughtful balance between immediate political pressures and long-term reform needs, its success depends on effective implementation, transparent communication, and sustained public trust.

The interim government faces the challenge of balancing the urgency for elections with the necessity of systemic reforms. By fostering consensus, demonstrating tangible progress, and engaging citizens, Yunus and his administration can navigate this period with integrity and purpose.

As Bangladesh stands at this historic crossroads,. Yunus’ leadership offers a rare opportunity to build a more inclusive, accountable, and resilient democracy. The path forward requires collaboration, patience, and an unwavering commitment to democratic ideals, paving the way for a brighter future for all Bangladeshis.

Dr. Serajul I. Bhuiyan is a professor and former chair of the Department of Journalism and Mass Communications at Savannah State University in Georgia.​
 

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Back