[🇧🇩] International Crimes Tribunal Act & The Crimes Against Humanity

G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] International Crimes Tribunal Act & The Crimes Against Humanity
104
1K
More threads by Saif

Saif

Senior Member
13,702
7,407
Origin

Axis Group

Govt to amend ICT act to widen definition
M Moneruzzaman 23 September, 2024, 23:35

The government has taken steps to amend the International Crimes Tribunal Act, 1973, to expand the definition of crimes against humanity to include enforced disappearances and five other offences.

The five additional crimes include gender-based violence, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, and enforced sterilisation, particularly when these five acts are committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population, or as part of systematic persecution on political, racial, ethnic, cultural, or religious grounds, regardless of whether they violate the domestic laws of the country where they are committed.


The proposed amendment was disclosed by the law ministry at an exchange of view meeting with legal experts, academicians, former judges, rights activists, journalists, several politicians and participants in the students-led uprising that led to the downfall of Sheikh Hasina on August 5.

Law adviser Asif Nazrul moderated the session, which included contributions from local government and rural development adviser Hassan Ariff, Public Works adviser Adilur Rahman Khan, and attorney general Md Asaduzzaman.

The law adviser stated that the draft amendment would be posted on the ministry’s website to invite public feedback before it is finalised.

The government also proposed an another amendment to the ICT Act, expanding liability for crimes to include leaders of organisations, associations, or organised groups who order, permit, acquiesce, or participate in the commission of crimes, with actual or constructive knowledge of their occurrence.

Another significant proposed amendment would allow the tribunal to ban political organisations for up to ten years if they are found to have committed, aided, abetted, or facilitated any of the defined crimes.

This ban would encompass all activities, including participation in elections, organising meetings or rallies, using media or digital platforms for propaganda, fundraising and conducting financial transactions, according to the proposed amendment.

The proposed amendment grants the tribunal discretion to reduce the ban period upon application by the organisation, provided it can demonstrate substantial reforms and adherence to international humanitarian law and human rights principles.

It further stipulates that any individual violating a ban imposed under this section would face penalties as determined by the tribunal.

Additionally, the amendments empower the tribunal to record and broadcast hearings or parts of them via the internet or other means, with safeguards to protect the privacy, safety, and dignity of participants.

The proposal also allows representatives from foreign governments, non-governmental organisations, and international bodies to attend public hearings, trials, and other proceedings, subject to prior approval and accreditation.

Moreover, the tribunal would be authorised to adopt technology-based procedures and admit evidence in digital formats, including data or information from electronic, optical, or computer memory, audio or video recordings, CCTV footage, drone data, cell phone records, and other digital devices.

Most participants at the views exchange meeting appreciated the government’s move to amend the act to enable the tribunal to try those involved in crimes during the student-led mass uprising that deposed then prime minister Sheikh Hasina who subsequently fled to India.

Some participants, however, expressed concern over the proposal to ban political parties for 10 years if found guilty of crimes against humanity. They argued that punishing an entire party for the actions of individual leaders was excessive.

Several participants stressed the importance of maintaining international standards in the trials to avoid the perception that the proceedings were targeted towards Sheikh Hasina, also the president of Awami League, and her associates.

Law adviser Asif Nazrul emphasised the government’s commitment to ensure fair justice acceptable to both the people of Bangladesh and the international community.

Commenting on the recent mass killings, he stated, ‘The older generation has been disturbingly complicit in killing the youths of this country. Despite the pain and frustration, it is crucial that these trials are perceived as just.’

Asif further noted that a prosecution and investigation team had already been formed to support the tribunal’s work, but the main challenge now was reconstituting the tribunal itself. He added that the reform of the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973, would be inclusive, incorporating inputs from experts across various fields.

Among those present at the meeting were Justice Division secretary Md Golam Rabbani, ICT chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam, Dhaka University law professor Mahbubur Rahman, and lawyers ZI Khan Panna and Sara Hossain, alongside journalists and other legal experts.​
 

First case of enforced disappearance filed against Hasina, aides with ICT
Staff Correspondent 23 September, 2024, 23:38

1727138787466.png

Sheikh Hasina | File photo

The maiden case of enforced disappearance was filed with the International Crimes Tribunal on Monday against deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, Dhaka Metropolitan Police detective branch official Mashiur Rahman and 23 of her associates.

A businessman, Enamul Kabir, filed the complaint with the International Crimes Tribunal on Monday on charge of crimes against humanity.

Enamul alleged that he was abducted from his business premises in Basabo area in the capital on November 17, 2018, and held in captivity for 10 days.

He claimed that he was blindfolded and subjected to inhumane torture on the orders of the then DB officer Mashiur Rahman.

Enamul believed that the purpose of the torture was to extract information about Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami.

The complaint called for an investigation into all cases of enforced disappearances during Sheikh Hasina regime, spanning from January 2009 until her resignation amid a student-led mass uprising on August 5.

Nine days after his abduction, Enamul was charged under the Explosive Substances Act, with allegations that explosives were found at his business.

He was later released on bail after an extended period in custody.

At a press briefing, ICT chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam said that the investigation agency would scrutinise Enamul’s complaint before initiating any broader investigations into enforced disappearances.

Enamul Kabir’s complaint became the second case of enforced disappearance filed with the ICT, bringing the total number of cases against Hasina and her associates to 31 since her resignation and fleeing to India on August 5.

On Sunday, the ICT received its first complaint related to enforced disappearance against six Rapid Action Battalion officers, accused of abducting and torturing physician Israt Rafique Eshita in 2021.

Eshita, in her complaint, alleged that RAB officers abducted her from her Kafrul home on July 28, 2021, and subjected her to inhumane torture.

In addition to these enforced disappearance cases, 144 other criminal cases have been lodged with the ICT against Hasina, her cabinet members, political colleagues, and senior law enforcement officials.

Many of these cases pertain to the killings of students during the student-led movement against discrimination between July 16 and August 5.

On Monday, a fresh case was filed against Hasina, her younger sister Sheikh Rehana, and 69 others, over the killing of garment worker Md Fazlu during the protest in the capital’s Mirpur-14 on August 5.

Fazlu’s wife, Suraiya, lodged the complaint with the court of Dhaka metropolitan magistrate Md Saiful Islam. The court directed the Police Bureau of Investigation to probe the matter and submit a report.

The complaint details how Fazlu was shot near the Mirpur-14 police lines at about 10:00am on August 5.

He was rushed to Max Medical College Hospital, where doctors pronounced him dead. Among the accused in the case are former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan and former state minister for industries affairs, Kamal Ahmed Majumder.​
 

ICT case filed against six RAB officers
Staff Correspondent 23 September, 2024, 00:29

1727139224131.png


A case was filed with the International Crimes Tribunal against six Rapid Action Battalion officers on charge of crimes against humanity for reported abduction, enforced disappearance and torture of a physician in 2021.

In the first-ever case filed with the tribunal for reported abdcutionand enforced disappearance, the complainant, physician Israt Rafique Eshita, alleged that the officers abducted her from her house at Kafrul in the capital on July 28, 2021.

The accused officers include the then Squadron Leader Ali Ashraf, IT expert Rakib, and additional superintendent of police Md Akhteruzzaman.

According to Israt’s complaint, she became a victim of enforced disappearance after the battalion officers abducted her and held her in an undisclosed location, where she was subjected to torture. She was produced before the media by the battalion five days later, on August 1, 2021.

On the following day, August 2, 2021, Israt was publicly presented as a ‘fake physician’ and implicated in three narcotics-related cases, which she claimed, were fabricated.

Her case took to 30 the number of cases filed with the tribunal, mostly targeting deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, since her resignation and fleeing to India on August 5.

In a related development, the International Crimes Tribunal-1 has received two more complaints against Sheikh Hasina, involving allegations of crimes against humanity in connection with the deaths of Dr Sajib Sarkar and Sheikh Ashabul Yamin, both of whom were killed in police firing during the student-people uprising on July 18.

Halim Sarkar, the father of Dr Sajib Sarkar, filed a complaint accusing 71 individuals, including police members, of killing his son.

Sajib, who completed his MBBS from Taherunnesa Medical College in 2020, was shot dead by police at Azampur of Uttara in the capital during peaceful protests.

‘They killed my innocent son, and I want justice,’ Halim Sarkar told the media after filing the case.

In another complaint, Yamin’s uncle, Md Abdullah Al Mun Kadir, accused 78 individuals, including Sheikh Hasina, Awami League leaders Obaidul Quader, Zunaid Ahmed Palak, and Mohammad A Arafat, of genocide and crimes against humanity under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act of 1973.

Yamin was reportedly detained by police during the student-people uprising in Savar and shot at point-blank range. Disturbing footage of the police dragging Yamin’s body to an armoured vehicle, dropping it on the street, and brutally discarding it on a road divider went viral and shocked the nation. Yamin was rushed to Savar Enam Medical College Hospital, where doctors pronounced him dead.

The allegations against the accused are being pursued under sections 3(2), 4(1), and 4(2) of the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, as calls for justice intensify following the tragic events of July 18.​
 

Complaint filed at commission on forced disappearances against ex-army chief, 2 army officials
Staff Correspondent
Dhaka
Published: 30 Sep 2024, 21: 41

1727747139047.png

Enforced disappearance Representational image

A complaint has been filed at the commission of inquiry on enforced disappearances against three former army officials including former army chief General (retd) SM Shafiuddin Ahmed.

The other two officials facing the allegations are Lieutenant General (retd) Md. Akbar Hossain and Major General (retd) Md. Sarwar Hossain.

Supreme Court lawyer and former army official Major General (retd) M Sarwar Hossain filed the allegation on Sunday, detailing the events of enforced disappearances, of which he was a victim.

M Sarwar Hossain confirmed the matter to Prothom Alo on Monday.

No commissioner or officials of the commission made any official statement on the matter. Wishing anonymity, commission officials said they have received several complaints.

Lawyer Major General (retd) M Sarwar Hossain called the three former army officials the friends of the autocrat, masterminds of killings and enforced disappearances, as well as architects and protectors of secret prison (known as Aynaghar).

The complainant said the defendants in collusion among themselves took Sarwar to the headquarters of the Director General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) for tea at 11:00 am on 27 October 2016 where he was threatened to be detained in the secret prison for speaking against the government. He, however, was released after 11 hours.

According to M Sarwar Hossain, he went to voluntary retirement after serving in the army for 20 years and then joined the law profession in 2007. He has been speaking about good governance, justice, democracy and human rights at various forums since 2008; especially he participates in discussions at various local and foreign media.

M Sarwar Hossain further alleged the accused persons could not take any criticism. Since he spoke about democracy, good governance and human rights, as well as criticised the fascist rule, these three army officials were furious against him.

The complainant against the former army chief SM Shafiuddin Ahmed said he suppressed people with different opinions, committed crimes against human rights, and destroyed democracy by aiding in the staged elections in 2024.

Lieutenant General (retd) Md. Akbar Hossain faced complaint of detaining numerous people in secret prison from 2010 to 2018 when he served in the DGFI, as well as of killing people in so-called crossfire, destroying democracy by aiding in the staged elections in 2024 and being a close friend of the fallen dictator.

Major General (retd) Md. Sarwar Hossain is alleged to have committed and aided in various crimes of human rights violations including enforced disappearances and killing while serving as the director of DGFI in 2015 and 2016. He was also a close friend of the fallen autocrat, said the complaint.​
 

Complaint filed at ICT accuses AL, 14-party allies of committing genocide
Staff Correspondent 02 October, 2024, 16:39

1727917959168.png

BSS photo

A complaint was on Wednesday filed with the International Crimes Tribunal seeking a 10-year ban on the Awami League-led alliance, accusing them of committing genocide and crimes against humanity during the student-led mass uprising.

The complaint alleged that the law enforcement agencies that acted on orders from the alliance were instructed to ‘shoot on sight’.

The orders from the alliance led to the deaths of 1,581 people, most of them students during the student-mass uprising.

The first-ever complaint against AL along with its allies for committing crimes against humanity during the student-led revolution was filed by Bobby Hajjaj, the chairman of the Nationalist Democratic Movement.

The student-led movement intensified between July 16 and August 5.

With the latest complaint, the number of genocide and crimes against humanity cases brought before the ICT has risen to 35. Among them, 16 relate to atrocities committed during Bangladesh’s 1971 War of Independence, which remain pending before the tribunal.

According to the health affairs sub-committee of the Student Movement Against Discrimination, the death toll rose as violence escalated, culminating in the resignation of Awami League President Sheikh Hasina as prime minister and fleeing to India on August 5.

Hajjaj called on the ICT to investigate the Awami League, the Workers’ Party of Bangladesh, Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal-Jasod, and AL’s other allies for their role in the alleged atrocities.

He requested the tribunal to hold the alliance leaders accountable for their decision to impose a curfew on July 19, during which security forces were allegedly given orders to shoot on sight.

‘This was a premeditated massacre,’ said Hajjaj.

‘By giving such an order, the Awami League and its allies committed genocide and crimes against humanity.’

The complaint specifically named key alliance partners, including Sheikh Hasina-led Awami League, the Jatiya Party-JP led by Anwar Hossain Manju, Bangladesh Samyabadi Dal led by Dilip Barua, Workers’ Party of Bangladesh led by Rashed Khan Menon, and the Bangladesh Tarikat Federation, among others. The coalition is accused of orchestrating widespread violence and violations of international humanitarian law.

ICT prosecutor BM Sultan Mahmud confirmed that the complaint sought to impose ban on the Awami League and its alliance for 10 years if found guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity.

This development comes shortly after the interim government proposed an amendment to the ICT Act on September 23.

The amendment would expand the scope of liability for crimes to include leaders of organisations or groups who order, permit, or participate in the commission of atrocities, with actual or constructive knowledge of the crimes. If passed, this amendment would empower the tribunal to ban political organisations for up to 10 years if found guilty of committing, aiding, or abetting crimes against humanity.

Besides this, another complaint was filed with the tribunal against Hasina and her 24 associates on charge of genocides and crimes against humanity over the killing of class X student Anas in the capital’s Chankharpul on August 5.

Anas’ father Mohammad Palash filed the complaint with the office of the ICT chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam.

‘Anas joined the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement in Chankharpul on August 5. He left a letter for his parents, seeking their forgiveness and urging them to be proud of him if he failed to return from protest.

‘Anas was shot to death. We have received video footage of members of Armed Police Battalion shooting indiscriminately in the alleys on that day,’ the chief prosecutor Tajul Islam said.​
 

গণহত্যার বিচার শুরু হলে অনেক দ্বিধা-প্রশ্ন দূর হয়ে যাবে: আসিফ নজরুল
সপ্তাহ খানেকের মধ্যে আইসিটি (আন্তর্জাতিক অপরাধ ট্রাইব্যুনাল) গঠিত হয়ে যাবে।

1728694436769.png

অন্তর্বর্তী সরকারের আইন উপদেষ্টা আসিফ নজরুল | ছবি: টেলিভিশন থেকে নেওয়া

ছাত্র-জনতার আন্দোলনে গণহত্যার প্রচুর আলামত পাওয়া গেছে জানিয়ে অন্তর্বর্তী সরকারের আইন উপদেষ্টা আসিফ নজরুল বলেছেন, 'আমরা যখন জুলাই-আগস্ট মাসে পৈশাচিক গণহত্যার বিচার অচিরেই শুরু করব, তখন দেখবেন, আমাদের অনেক দ্বিধা, অনেক প্রশ্ন দূর হয়ে যাবে।'

আজ শুক্রবার বিকেলে সিরাজগঞ্জ পৌর শহরের শ্রী শ্রী মহাপ্রভুর আখড়া পূজামণ্ডপে সনাতন ধর্মাবলম্বীদের সঙ্গে মতবিনিময় শেষে গণমাধ্যমকর্মীদের প্রশ্নের জবাবে তিনি এই কথা বলেন।

আসিফ নজরুল বলেন, 'আনন্দময় পরিবেশ বিরাজ করছে, এটা দেখে আমারও আনন্দ লাগছে। আমি শুনেছি, সিরাজগঞ্জে আজকে যে আলোকসজ্জা হবে, সেটা নাকি বাংলাদেশের অন্যান্য জেলা থেকে আরও বেশি সুন্দর ও উজ্জ্বল হবে।'

তিনি বলেন, 'আমরা এই দেশে কেউ ধর্মলঘু না, ধর্মগুরু না। কেউ আমরা সংখ্যালঘু না, সংখ্যাগরিষ্ঠ না। আমরা সবাই বাংলাদেশের নাগরিক। আমরা সবাই সমান মর্যাদা, সমান অধিকার ভোগ করে থাকব। সবাই সব ধর্মের প্রতি সম্মান-ভালোবাসা নিয়ে থাকব। সবাই শান্তিতে এবং সুখে থাকব।'

অন্তর্বর্তী সরকার ন্যায়বিচার নিশ্চিত করতে বদ্ধ পরিকর জানিয়ে আইন উপদেষ্টা বলেন, 'সপ্তাহ খানেকের মধ্যে আইসিটি (আন্তর্জাতিক অপরাধ ট্রাইব্যুনাল) গঠিত হয়ে যাবে। এর কাজ কিন্তু ইতোমধ্যে শুরু হয়েছে। আমাদের প্রসিকিউটর টিম গঠিত হয়েছে এক মাস হয়ে গেছে। আমাদের ইনভেস্টিগেশন টিম গঠিত হয়েছে দুই সপ্তাহ হয়ে গেছে। প্রচুর আলামত আমরা পেয়েছি, আমি উনাদের থেকে যেটা শুনেছি।'

'আমরা যখন জুলাই-আগস্ট মাসের পৈশাচিক গণহত্যার বিচার অচিরেই শুরু করব, তখন দেখবেন, আমাদের অনেক দ্বিধা, অনেক প্রশ্ন দূর হয়ে যাবে,' বলেন তিনি।​
 

Justice Golam Mortuza appointed new chairman of International Crimes Tribunal
FE ONLINE DESK
Published :
Oct 14, 2024 20:26
Updated :
Oct 14, 2024 21:20

1728952675249.png


Justice Md Golam Mortuza Majumdar, recently appointed as an additional judge in the High Court, has been selected to lead the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) by the government.

This was announced by Law Adviser Professor Asif Nazrul at a press briefing at the Secretariat on Monday evening.

He informed that Justice Md Shafiul Alam Mahmud and retired District and Sessions Judge Md Mohitul Haque Enam Chowdhury are the other members of the tribunal.​
 

Journalists facing ICT cases will get justice
Says law adviser

1729038774698.png


Law Adviser Prof Asif Nazrul has said the complaints that have been filed with the International Crimes Tribunal against journalists will be carefully examined to ensure justice and avoid unnecessary harassment.

"There will be a trial, and it will ensure justice. The prosecution team at the International Crimes Tribunal will strictly carry out the scrutinisation process by following due diligence."

He made the remarks as reporters drew his attention to the ICT cases filed against journalists when he went to inspect the renovation work of the tribunal building in the capital yesterday.

"We have come to know that at least 1,500 people were killed, and thousands more were left paralysed due to limb loss during the July uprising. There have been no instances of such genocide in Bangladesh or the subcontinent during peacetime. It is also rare around the world.

"Therefore, we are pledged bound to the people of the country to try those involved in the genocide."​
 

ICT to begin trial for crimes against humanity in July-August uprising Thursday
M Moneruzzaman 15 October, 2024, 19:42

1729040471388.png

Advocate Mohammad Tajul Islam, chief prosecutor of the ICT, speaks to media at the tribunal building in Dhaka on Tuesday. | BSS photo

The International Crimes Tribunal, reconstituted under the interim government, is set to begin its proceedings on Thursday.

The government has iterated that prosecuting those responsible for the July-August massacre is a top priority.

At a press conference held at the Foreign Service Academy, deputy press secretary Abul Kalam Azad Majumder emphasised the government’s focus on bringing the perpetrators of the July massacre to justice.

He added that political parties involved in dialogues with the advisory council have also expressed strong support for prosecuting those responsible for the mass killings during the student-led uprising.

Chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam, in a separate briefing, confirmed that the tribunal would commence its proceedings on Thursday.

His remarks followed a courtesy visit by Tajul Islam and his prosecution team to the newly appointed chairman, Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, and tribunal members Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and retired district judge Md Mohitul Haq Anam Chowdhury.

Tajul explained that the prosecution team would officially welcome the new judges at the Tribunal courtroom today and appear before the tribunal during its first sitting on Thursday.

He declined to disclose specific cases but noted that the prosecution would seek necessary orders over the pending complaints.

As of October 15, the tribunal has received 39 complaints of genocide and crimes against humanity filed against Sheikh Hasina, her cabinet members, and associates over the killings during the July-August mass uprising and enforced disappearance incidents during the Awami League regime.

Additional criminal cases, largely related to killings during the student-led mass uprising, have also been lodged following Sheikh Hasina’s resignation and flight to India on August 5.

The tribunal is also handling over 26 cases relating to the atrocities committed during the War of Independence in 1971 initiated by the past Awami League government.

During the past 15-year rule of the Awami League government, attorney general Md Asaduzzaman earlier on October 5 disclosed to the journalists that over 4,000 people were killed extrajudicially, 700 were victims of enforced disappearance, and 60,000 were accused in ‘fictitious cases.’

Interim government law adviser Asif Nazrul, during a visit to inspect the renovation progress of the tribunal, reaffirmed the government’s commitment to holding fair trials.

‘We are determined to ensure justice for the families and victims of these atrocities,’ he said.

Nazrul recalled that at least 1,500 students and civilians were killed, and thousands more injured, during indiscriminate firing ordered by the Awami League government during the July-August movement.

‘This level of brutality during an anti-government movement is unprecedented,’ he remarked.

He expressed optimism that by November 5 the tribunal would be able to resume proceedings related to the July-August massacre once renovations were complete.

Nazrul also assured that the prosecution team would follow due process in handling the genocide complaints, including those involving journalists, to ensure fair trials.

Housing and industries adviser Adilur Rahman Khan accompanied Nazrul during the visit, both of whom later met with the newly appointed tribunal judges.​
 

ICT issues arrest warrants against Hasina, 45 others
Directs authorities to produce them before court by Nov 18

The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) today issued arrest warrants against former prime minister Sheikh Hasina and 45 others, including top Awami League leaders, in connection with alleged crimes against humanity committed during the July-August uprising.

ICT, led by its chairman Justice Md Golam Mortuza Majumdar, passed the orders after the prosecution filed two petitions with the tribunal, seeking arrest warrants against them, Chief Prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam told The Daily Star.

The tribunal also directed the authorities concerned to produce the 46, including Hasina, before it after arresting them by November 18, he said.

Former ministers Obaidul Quader, Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, Hasan Mahmud and Anisul Huq are among the 46, tribunal sources said.

On October 14, the government reconstituted the ICT by appointing Justice Mortuza as chairman, and Justice Shafiul and former judge Mohitul as members.

On October 15, Justice Mortuza and two members of ICT -- Justice Md Shafiul Alam Mahmud and former district and session's judge Md Mohitul Haque Enam Chowdhury -- joined the tribunal.

Justice Mortuza and Justice Shafiul are among 23 additional judges appointed to the High Court on October 8.

This followed the government's decision last month to reform both the prosecution team and the investigation agency of the tribunal.

The move is aimed at expediting the trials of crimes against humanity and genocide committed during the July-August uprising, which culminated in the fall of the Hasina-led government on August 5.

At least 753 people were killed and thousands more injured during the mass uprising.

So far, over 60 complaints of crimes against humanity and genocide have been filed against Hasina and many of her party men with the ICT investigation agency and the prosecution team.

The investigation agency and the prosecution team have already launched probes into the complaints.

The government has also prepared a draft to amend the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act-1973.​
 

Govt to take all necessary steps to repatriate Sheikh Hasina: Adviser
Diplomatic Correspondent
Dhaka
Published: 17 Oct 2024, 20: 05

1729215111977.png

Md Touhid Hossain speaks to the media at the foreign ministry in Dhaka on 17 October, 2024. Courtesy

The interim government will take all necessary measures to repatriate former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, said Md Touhid Hossain, the foreign affairs adviser.

He made the statement while speaking to the media at the ministry on Thursday afternoon, hours after the International Crimes Tribunal issued an arrest warrant against Sheikh Hasina.

When a journalist asked about the government's stance on bringing Sheikh Hasina back, the adviser said, "We received the news only five minutes ago. Of course, we will take necessary actions. The court has given a one-month deadline, and we will do whatever is necessary to repatriate her within this time frame."

Regarding the process of repatriation, Md Touhid Hossain said, "The mode of repatriation is not important here. What is important is that the court has ordered her arrest. The warrant was not directed at me, but to the police. However, since Sheikh Hasina is not in the country, the police will not be able to execute the order. When it is passed to us, it will be taken care of."

Another journalist asked about Sheikh Hasina's current status in India, the adviser said they just received the information (warrant) and were awaiting further updates. "We will be able to share once we get the details," he added.

The International Crimes Tribunal has issued an arrest warrant for former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, along with warrants for 44 others, including Awami League general secretary Obaidul Quader.

The warrants were issued on Thursday following two separate pleas. The tribunal's trial for the killings during the student-led mass uprising began Thursday morning.

Chief prosecutor of the tribunal, lawyer Mohammad Tajul Islam, commented on the widespread nature of these crimes across Bangladesh.

He stated, "I appealed to the court that if the accused individuals, who are extremely influential, are not arrested, it will be impossible to conduct a thorough investigation. General people, even family members of the deceased, do not dare to speak out due to fear. In the interest of a fair investigation, we requested the issuance of arrest warrants."​
 

Supressing mass uprising: ICT probe body seeks info from public

1729381072491.png


The investigation agency of the International Criminal Tribunal (ICT) yesterday issued a public notice seeking information on the crimes committed to suppress the anti-discrimination student movement in July and August.

The public notice was issued by retired Additional Inspector General of Police Mazharul Haque, coordinator of the investigation agency housed at 87, Comrade Farhad Road in Dhanmondi 11/A.

Necessary confidentiality will be maintained in this regard, the notification assured.

The notification called upon people to contact the ICT investigation agency's Dhaka office if they have any information, documents, photographs, audio-video clips, etc related to killings, serious injury, arson, looting, and other crimes to use those as evidence.

Various forces of then government and Awami League-led coalition parties, allied organisations, criminal individuals or groups have committed the crimes during the period from July 1 to August 5, 2024, aimed at suppressing the anti-discrimination student movement, it said.

People are requested to send the required information via email at coordinator@ictbdinvestigation.gov.bd and mobile numbers 01711-905603, 01611-905603 (during office hours) of the investigation agency.

Over 50 complaints have so far been submitted to the agency and the prosecution office of the ICT from July 5 to August 5, for the genocide and crimes against humanity committed across the country.

The ICT began the trial proceedings with the issuance of arrest warrants against 46 people, including former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Thursday.​
 

Some concerns about the proposed changes in international crimes tribunals
Concerns about the international crimes tribunals act amendment

1729556408786.png

VISUAL: ANWAR SOHEL

While presenting a draft amendment to the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973—during a recent stakeholder discussion aimed at improving transparency in trial proceedings to prosecute crimes committed to suppress the mass uprising that toppled Sheikh Hasina's autocratic regime—a few concerns have arisen about the law's alignment with international standards, along with some laudable propositions.

The good news is that, at the invitation of the interim government, a fact-finding team from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has already launched an independent investigation into human rights violations that occurred between July 1 and August 15 this year during the student-led protests. Newspaper reports indicate that the team will investigate 15 categories of human rights violations, including crimes against humanity and extrajudicial killings, with the investigation report expected to be submitted to the interim government by the last week of November. The fact-finding team is mandated to establish facts, identify responsibilities, analyse root causes, and make concrete recommendations for Bangladesh to address past human rights violations and prevent their recurrence, according to a UN statement.

Meanwhile, the central health committee of the anti-discrimination student movement, in its latest estimate, reported that 1,583 individuals had been killed and over 22,000 injured during the July-August unrest. This information was shared by the chief adviser of the interim government in a post from his verified Facebook page on October 6.

Speaking at the brainstorming session on the amendment to the law, Law Adviser Prof Asif Nazrul made the government's intentions clear, saying, "We no longer want wounds or divisions in this society. Through these trials, we want to initiate a process of reconciliation. Everyone should agree that the trial conducted is fair and that the punishment, if given, is fully deserved."

However, the provision for death penalty in Bangladesh's justice system is a major roadblock to bringing the process in line with global standards, especially when democracies around the world are calling for complete abolition of capital punishment. At the end of 2023, as many as 112 countries were fully abolitionist and 144 in total abolished the death penalty in law or practice, according to Amnesty International. The proposed changes to the law in Bangladesh, regrettably, fall short of embracing the principle of abolishing the death sentence. And since the UN opposes the use of the death penalty, there is no scope for UN endorsement in this matter. Death penalty is irreversible, leaving no room for correction in the event of judicial errors, and it has proven ineffective as a deterrent to crime. Its most troubling aspect, however, is its frequent misuse to suppress dissent, whether political, religious or otherwise.

The judiciary has the critical responsibility of preventing miscarriage of justice and ensuring that no innocent person is wrongfully convicted or punished. As the saying goes, "It is better to let a hundred guilty persons go free than to convict one innocent person."

Another eyebrow-raising aspect of the proposed changes to the 1973 law is the call for the introduction of a provision that would allow banning political parties for up to 10 years if found guilty of crimes against humanity or genocide. If implemented, this provision risks treading a fine line between justice and the violation of fundamental rights. It is worth noting that no political party's charter or constitution endorses acts such as murder, violence, discrimination of any kind, or crimes against humanity, raising the question of whether a political party as an entity can truly be held criminally responsible. In practice, criminal charges are typically brought against individuals or leaders within the party, rather than the organisation as a whole.

Let's look at the existing laws that prohibit people from forming parties. Article 38 of the constitution states that no citizen shall have the right to form or be a member of an association if it is formed with the intent to destroy religious, social or communal harmony among citizens; to create discrimination among citizens on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or language; to organise terrorist acts or militant activities against the state, its citizens, or any other country; or if its formation and objectives are inconsistent with the constitution. According to Section 18 (1) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 2009, the government, based on reasonable grounds, may issue a gazette notification to include an individual in the schedule or declare an entity banned and list it in the schedule for being involved in terrorist activities. Therefore, the authorities' task is to prove that the entity to be banned is involved in terrorist activities. Is doing so as simple as it sounds?

Appointments of foreign lawyers in court proceedings, along with the recording and broadcast of trials via the internet or other mediums are commendable measures. Moreover, the decision to allow representatives from foreign governments, non-governmental organisations, and international organisations to attend public hearings, trials and other proceedings reflects a commitment to openness and accountability.

With Bangladesh embarking on broader reforms across all spheres of governance, these trials to prosecute those responsible for upholding and promoting a fascist regime of 15 years must meet international standards of transparency. Only through such rigorous legal processes and appropriate punishments can the country hope to eradicate the roots of autocracy and fascism altogether.

Shamim A Zahedy is a journalist.​
 

ICT sends names of Hasina, 22 others to IGP for arrest
M Moneruzzaman 22 October, 2024, 00:19

1729557842966.png


The International Crimes Tribunal on Monday forwarded the names of deposed prime minister and Awami League president Sheikh Hasina and 22 of her associates to the inspector general of police requesting action on arrest warrants issued in connection with two cases related to crimes against humanity during the student-mass uprising in July and August.

These 23 individuals are among 46 accused against whom the ICT issued warrants of arrest on October 17.

Besides Sheikh Hasina, the list includes names of her relatives, her cabinet members, Awami League politicians, a retired Appellate Division judge, an author and university professor, former army officers, and former senior police officers.

The names sent to the IGP include former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, her younger sister Sheikh Rehana, her son Sajeeb Wazed Joy, former state minister for information and broadcasting Mohammad Arafat A Hossain, former information and communication technology state minister Zunaid Ahmed Palak, former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan, former liberation war affairs minister AKM Mozzammel Haque, former law minister Anisul Huq, former education minister Dipu Moni, senior Awami League leader Sheikh Selim, Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh and Juba League chairman Sheikh Fazle Shams Porash.

The former officials of law enforcement agencies whose names were sent to the IGP include ex-inspector general of police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, former Detective Branch chief Harun-or-Rashid, and former Dhaka Metropolitan Police commissioner Habibur Rahman.

The names further include former Rapid Action Battalion’s Harun-Ar-Rashid, former major general Ziaul Ahsan and high-ranking police officials Monirul Islam, Biplob Kumar Sarkar, and Prolay Kumar Zoarder.

The names also include Sheikh Hasina’s military adviser Tareque Ahmed Siddique, retired Appellate Division judge AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury, and writer and professor Muhammad Zafar Iqbal.

Though these 23 names were disclosed to the IGP, the identities of the other 23 accused persons were kept undisclosed to protect the integrity of the ongoing investigation, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The list of the disclosed names was also sent to the Department of Prisons to check the names of accused already arrested in other cases, the sources said.

ICT prosecutor Tamim Gazi Monwar Hossain said that the list of names submitted to the IGP does not include all the 46 wanted accused individuals.

He added that the IGP was asked to provide information regarding the whereabouts of the accused.

‘Once we receive the IGP’s report, we will request the tribunal to issue detention orders for the accused already held in other cases,’ Tamim said.

The arrest warrants were issued on October 17 after the chief prosecutor filed two separate petitions—one against Hasina and the other targeting Awami League general secretary Obaidul Quader and other former government officials. The tribunal has ordered that all accused appear before the court on November 18, marking the next stage of legal proceedings.

Though the full list remains confidential, the chief prosecutor, Md Tajul Islam, confirmed that the names of Awami League president Sheikh Hasina, AL general secretary Obaidul Quader and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan were disclosed publicly.

Meanwhile, the International Crimes Tribunal on Monday received seven more complaints over enforced disappearances and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by Sheikh Hasina and her associates during the student-led mass uprising until August 5 from July 1.

Since her ousting as prime minister and fleeing to India following the mass uprising on August 5, at least 45 ICT cases have been filed against Hasina and her associates.

Five complaints over enforced disappearance were filed by the central committee of Islami Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of Jamaat-e-Islami.

A businessman named Humayun Kabir filed another complaint against 42 including Hasina, for keeping him confined for 11 days in an ‘Ayna Ghor’ in 2018.

Meanwhile, another complaint was filed over the murder of one Mohammad Hridoy on August 5 in the Gazipur Konapara area during the mass-uprising.

Besides, two more cases were filed on Monday with Shahbagh police station and a Dhaka Metropolitan Magistrate court against Hasina and her aides for murder, and an alleged attack on protesting students by the Bangladesh Chhatra League activists on the Dhaka University campus during the student-mass uprising.

One of the cases was filed against 391 people, including Hasina and former ministers Obaidul Quader, Mohibul Hasan Chowdhoury and BCL president Saddam Hossain for the attack at the Dhaka University campus on July 15, the police said.

The other case was filed against 57 people, including Hasina, over the killing of Sohan Shah in the capital’s Rampura area on July 19, court officials said.​
 

Mass uprising: Hasina sued at ICT over journo killing
Complaint filed against Hasina over journalist Priyo murder

1729642779094.png


The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) yesterday received a complaint against eight people, including ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina, over the killing of journalist Tahir Zaman Priyo during the anti-discrimination student movement.

Martyred Priyo's mother Samsi Ara Zaman filed the complaint at the ICT chief prosecutor's office.

Priyo used to work for online news portal The Report.

He was gunned down behind Lab Aid Hospital in the Dhanmondi area of Dhaka around 5:00pm on July 19.

"Someone from a group of gunmen wearing APBn uniform shot him from behind. There are video footage of the gruesome killing of my son," the grieving mother said in the complaint.

She also said she hoped that families of all the martyrs and people injured in the student-led mass uprising would get justice at the ICT.​
 

Prosecution for transfer of all cases to ICT amid case trade allegations
Staff Correspondent 23 October, 2024, 01:05

1729643226619.png


The chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal, Md Tajul Islam, on Tuesday announced that the prosecution would soon seek an order from the tribunal requesting transfer of all cases related to the July-August massacre from the police stations and lower courts to the tribunal.

This move came after two coordinators of the movement, Umama Fatema and Sharmin Sumi, on Tuesday visited the chief prosecutor at his office expressing concern over the innocent individuals being implicated in cases while actual perpetrators remain untouched.

They also alleged that filing cases across the country turned into a ‘business’ for some, exploiting the tragedy for financial gain.

Allegations of harassment have surfaced after cases were filed accusing 300 to 400 individuals of extortion, with demands for money from the accused.

These complaints have been reported from different parts of the country, said Umama Fatema, flanked by Sharmin Sumi, while addressing reporters inside the International Crimes Tribunal compound.

ICT chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam urged victims of the July massacre not to file cases with police stations or courts, but to rely on the tribunal for justice. He assured that the prosecution, alongside the investigation agency, would review all complaints based on evidence to determine the true offenders, ensuring that innocent individuals are not wrongfully implicated.

Tajul also sought to alleviate fears, stating that the tribunal would not harass innocent people.

He, however, made it clear that genuine offenders involved in crimes against humanity during the July massacre would not escape prosecution.

In a related development, a new case was filed with the tribunal against deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and seven others in connection with the killing of journalist Tawhid Zaman of The Reporter on July 19 at the Science Lab crossing during the movement.

The victim’s sister, Tamanna Samiara, filed the complaint. The other accused included former inspector general of police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, former Ramna Zone deputy commissioner Ashraf Islam, former New Market Zone assistant commissioner Hafiz Al Asad, former officer-in-charge of New Market police station Aminul Islam, and 30-40 unidentified members of the Special Security and Protection Battalion, along with some unidentified members of the Border Guard.

Since her ousting as prime minister and fleeing to India following the mass uprising on August 5, over 70 ICT cases have been filed against Hasina and her associates, according to the ICT prosecutor.

Moreover, Hasina and her associates were made accused in over 100 murder cases filed with courts and police stations across the country over the July massacre.

Besides this, a total of 237 people, including ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina, were sued over the murder of Jatiyatabadi Shramik Dal activist Abdul Hannan.

Hannan’s brother-in-law Dipokul Islam Dipu filed the complaint with the court of Dhaka Metropolitan Magistrate, Md Ali Haider, on October 21.​
 

ICT gets five more prosecutors

1729901488888.png


The government has appointed five more prosecutors to the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT), bringing the total number of prosecutors to nine.

The newly-appointed five prosecutors are -- SM Moinul Karim, Md Nure Ershad Siddiqui, Shaikh Mahdi, Tarek Abdullah, and Tanvir Hasan Joha.

Of the five, SM Moinul Karim and Md Nure Ershad have been appointed with the status of deputy attorney general, while the rest except Tanvir Hasan Joha will get the status of assistant attorney general. Joha is a digital forensic expert.

The solicitor wing of the Law and Justice Division issued a gazette notification in this regard on Thursday, mentioning that the order comes into effect immediately.

The government on September 7 appointed four prosecutors, with Supreme Court Advocate Muhammad Tajul Islam being made the chief prosecutor.

The three other prosecutors are Gazi Monawar Hossain Tamim, BM Sultan Mahmud, and Abdullah Al Noman.​
 

Bangladesh’s ICT asks jail authorities to produce 14 politicians, 6 ex-security officials over crimes against humanity
M Moneruzzaman 27 October, 2024, 15:42

1730076679773.png

File photo

The International Crimes Tribunal on Sunday ordered jail authorities to produce 14 political leaders, a retired Supreme Court judge, five former police officers, and a dismissed army officer before it.

The three-member tribunal, led by its chairman Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, also issued warrants for the arrest of former Dhaka Metropolitan Police commissioner Habibur Rahman and 16 other former high-ranking police officials.

The tribunal ordered the production of the 20 on November 18 and 20 and ordered the arrest of the 17 on charges of crimes against humanity linked to the student-people uprising that overthrew Sheikh Hasina from power.

In the face of the uprising, Hasina resigned as prime minister and fled to India on August 5.

Judges Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and M Mohitul Hoque Anam Chawdhury are two other members of the tribunal.

Following applications submitted by chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam, the tribunal directed that the 14 politicians would be brought before the tribunal on November 18, with the remaining six defendants scheduled to be produced on November 20.

All 20 detainees are currently held in various jails in connection with murder cases filed by the families of victims who lost their lives during the uprising.

The 14 politicians facing the crimes against humanity charges are former ministers Anisul Huq, Faruk Khan, Muhammad Abdur Razzaque, Shahjahan Khan, Kamal Ahmed Mojumder, Dipu Moni, former advisers to then prime minister Sheikh Hasina Salman F Rahman and Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, Workers Party president Rashed Khan Menon, Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal president Hasanul Haque Inu, former textile and jute minister Golam Dastagir Gazi, former information and communication technology state minister Zunaid Ahmed Palak, retired Appellate Division judge AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury, and former home secretary Jahangir Alam.

Additionally, five former police officers and one former army officer, including former inspector general of police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, dismissed Major General Ziaul Ahsan, and former Dhaka district officials Abdullahhil Kafi, Abul Hasan, Mazharul Islam, and Arafat Hossain have been summoned to appear on November 20. Chief prosecutor Tajul Islam confirmed that the tribunal granted their request to arrest these officials based on preliminary evidence gathered by investigators.

The tribunal ordered the arrest of former Dhaka Metropolitan Police commissioner Habibur Rahman and 16 other former high-ranking police officers in connection with alleged crimes against humanity during the July-August student-led uprising.

The tribunal has directed the inspector general of police to execute the warrants and report on their status by November 18.

Chief prosecutor Tajul Islam requested the tribunal to withhold the names of most of the implicated officers to prevent them from evading arrest.

He, however, identified key figures, including former Rapid Action Battalion officer Harun-Ar-Rashid, former Special Branch chief Monirul Islam, former Detective Branch chief Harun-Or-Rashid, and former Dhaka Metropolitan Police commissioners Biplob Kumar Sarker and Proloy Kumar Joarder.

Tajul Islam alleged that these high-ranking officers were involved in actions to suppress protesters, a strategy reportedly driven by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League and its 14-party alliance.

In his briefing, prosecutor Tajul Islam disclosed that International Crimes Tribunal investigators had provided a list of 70–75 individuals to the prosecution, from which they selected names for arrest warrants based on initial findings.

The tribunal’s ongoing investigation underscores the gravity of the July-August uprising and the potential accountability for alleged human rights abuses.

With all the named parties facing charges, the tribunal’s proceedings are a critical step in addressing the violent suppression that marked this historic movement, according to the prosecution.​
 

ICT allows bail to ex-DG of NSI Wahidul
FE Online Desk
Published :
Oct 29, 2024 19:19
Updated :
Oct 29, 2024 19:19

1730252619613.png


The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) on Tuesday allowed conditional bail to former director general (DG) of National Security Intelligence (NSI) Muhammad Wahidul Haque in a crimes against humanity case.

The three-judge panel of the ICT led by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder passed the order after holding a hearing in this regard, reports BSS.

“He is 78 years old and has languished in jail for the last six and a half years after getting arrested in the case. He is suffering from different old-age complications. We had pleaded for bail, saying the former government filed the forged and fabricated case against him, being angered for not getting illegal assistance from him during his tenures in NSI and police. The tribunal after going through all the relevant documents and hearing our arguments, allowed him the bail,” defence counsel Advocate Abdus Sattar Palwan told BSS.

The defence lawyer said the court granted Haque bail on conditions of not visiting or giving any threats to any witnesses, not talking to any media, not going outside, not leaving the country and keeping his passport in court custody.

The ICT-1 on October 16, 2019, indicted Muhammad Wahidul on the charges of committing crimes against humanity, genocide, and violating the Geneva Convention in 1971.

The investigation agency of the ICT on October 30, 2018, finalised its report on a probe into the alleged crimes against humanity committed in 1971 by Wahidul Haque.

According to the prosecution, Wahidul Haque, who was an adjutant of the 29 Cavalry Regiment based in Rangpur Cantonment at the time, went on a killing spree on March 28, 1971, as he and his subordinates brushed fire on freedom-loving people of the area and killed around 600 innocents.

They also set fire to houses and burnt the bodies of those killed in their gunfire, the prosecution said.

The ICT probe body launched its investigation against Haque on December 5, 2016, and concluded on October 30, 2018. They made 54 people witnesses in the trial.

Wahidul Haque was arrested on April 24, 2018, from his Baridhara house right after the ICT-1 issued an arrest warrant against him.​
 

ICT sends ex-DMP DC Jashim to jail
M Moneruzzaman 31 October, 2024, 00:05

1730338681632.png

The police on Wednesday produce former Dhaka Metropolitan Police deputy commissioner for Mirpur zone Md Jashim Uddin Molla, the first suspect to be brought before the reconstituted tribunal, before the International Crimes Tribunal in Dhaka on charges of crimes against humanity committed in Mirpur during the student-people uprising. | New Age photo

The International Crimes Tribunal on Wednesday sent Dhaka Metropolitan Police’s former deputy commissioner for Mirpur Zone, Md Jashim Uddin Molla, to jail in a case of crimes against humanity during the July-August students’ movement against discrimination in the capital’s Mirpur area.

Jashim is the first suspect to be brought before the reconstituted tribunal under the interim government following the fall of the Awami League regime amid a student-mass uprising on August 5.

The tribunal, comprising Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood, and retired district judge M Mohitul Hoque Anam Chowdhury, passed the order after the police produced Jashim before the tribunal at about 4:30pm, hours after he was arrested at a location in Rangpur.

‘As investigations continue, detention is necessary for a thorough and effective inquiry,’ said the presiding judge, Justice Golam Mortuza.

Chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam informed the court that Jashim was arrested at Rangpur early Wednesday by the Rangpur police, two days after the tribunal had on October 27 issued warrants for arresting 17 high-ranking officers in connection with the Mirpur atrocities.

Jashim was then handed over to Gopalganj police authorities before taken to the tribunal.

The prosecution alleged that Jashim, as the deputy commissioner for Mirpur zone, was involved in mass killings and other crimes during the student-led movement.

‘Over 35 cases have been filed regarding the killings and violence across Mirpur zone, and multiple complaints against Jashim and other high-ranking officers are lodged with the tribunal,’ Tajul said.

Wearing a sleeveless black shirt and trousers, Jashim appeared visibly distressed as he was placed in the tribunal’s lockup minutes after 3:30pm.

He stood up as the judges entered. He had no lawyer to represent him.

Journalists, prosecutors, and a few lawyers witnessed the brief hearing.

After the session, Jashim’s wife and two children were permitted to meet with him in a room adjacent to the tribunal’s lockup.

On October 27, the tribunal ordered jail authorities to produce 14 political leaders, a retired Supreme Court judge, five former police officers, and a dismissed army officer before it on November 18 and November 20 on charges of crimes against humanity linked to the student-people uprising that overthrew Sheikh Hasina from power.

The tribunal also issued warrants for the arrest of ex-DMP commissioner Habibur Rahman and 16 other former high-ranking police officials.

Chief prosecutor Tajul Islam requested the tribunal to withhold the names of most of the implicated officers to prevent them from evading arrest.

He, however, identified key figures including former Rapid Action Battalion officer Harun-Ar-Rashid, former Special Branch chief Monirul Islam, former Detective Branch chief Harun-Or-Rashid, and former DMP deputy commissioners Biplob Kumar Sarker and Proloy Kumar Joarder.

Tajul Islam alleged that these high-ranking officers were involved in actions to suppress protesters, a strategy reportedly driven by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League and its allies.

In his briefing, prosecutor Tajul Islam said that the tribunal’s investigators had provided a list of 70 or 75 individuals to the prosecution and they selected names from the list for seeking issuance of warrants of arrest, based on initial findings.

Interim government law adviser Asif Nazrul had recently reported to the press that at least 1,500 students and civilians were killed and thousands injured during the July-August movement following orders for indiscriminate firing by the then Awami League government.

The Awami League, after assuming power in January 2009, established two tribunals to prosecute those accused of crimes against humanity during the country’s Liberation War in 1971.

These tribunals concluded a total of 55 cases, primarily involving top leaders of the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami.

They have been dormant since February 12, 2024.​
 

Sheikh Hasina regime: trials and tribulations
by Zaki Omar 06 November, 2024, 00:00

1730943477685.png

International Criminal Court. | Human Rights Watch

AS THE world looked on in utter horror, the brutality of the Sheikh Hasina regime unfolded with unbridled extremes, reaching its peak intensity in the second half of July 2024. By the end of July, the unabated murders, tortures, enforced disappearances and imprisonments had reached a stage unseen or unheard of since the days of the Pakistani army’s brutal occupation in 1971. As an international human rights lawyer from Bangladesh, I could no longer remain a mere observer. I rang my friend and former colleague Ms Alison Battisson, the best international human rights lawyer that I know in Australia, and we decided to lodge an urgent communique with the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court on August 1, 2024.

Almost 12 weeks on, the scenario has changed drastically. Hasina has fled the country, and the interim government is juggling multiple challenges while striving to get state machinery back in sustainable order. Of significant relevance to this article, which will hopefully reach the attention of the chief adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus, the interim government has also appointed a chief prosecutor with a view to prosecuting perpetrators of the Hasina regime in the International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh.

While being fully respectful of the wishes and sentiments of all concerned to conduct trials of the Hasina regime in Bangladesh for the heinous crimes against humanity, this author requests the interim government to consider referring the Hasina regime’s crimes against humanity to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for reasons including the following:

Firstly, investigation and trial by prosecutors at the ICC will attract a lot more international credibility than that of an ICT in Bangladesh. This is not to undermine the quality or prudence of our capable law officers; however, the foundational framework of the ICT has caused concerns amongst human rights groups in the past both in terms of its substantive and procedural aspects. For example, inclusion of the death penalty, offences not being delineated with sufficient clarity, perceived lack of due process for rights of accused, and prohibition in Article 47A of our constitution against right of judicial review have not only made the ICT susceptible under international standards of best practices but also require constitutional refurbishments not within the purview of the current interim government.

Secondly, the investigation and fact-finding in the age of video, audio and electronic evidence will greatly benefit from the resources and expertise of the ICC prosecutors and relevant United Nations bodies. Human Rights Watch has proposed to our interim government to present, or support the adoption of, a resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Council that establishes a UN-backed independent mechanism with a comprehensive mandate to investigate, collect, store, and analyse evidence and cooperate with credible and independent national and international bodies towards accountability in relation to the violent incidents of July and August 2024 and its root causes. The material scope of an investigation encompasses acts by all relevant actors, including but not limited to previous cases of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and torture.

Thirdly, an ICC investigation will encompass all relevant actors of the Hasina regime in their involvement in crimes against humanity in Bangladesh. This will provide further credence and credibility to the interim government in its aspired role of impartiality and accountability while being steadfastly committed to the cause of justice. It will negate fear of cherry-picking of accused, or worse, a vengeful political witch-hunting exercise. As it stands, the current attorney general of Bangladesh has been a senior office bearer of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party until the day of his appointment; his additional attorney generals are all known as pro-BNP lawyers. I have personally known them as lawyers of excellent credentials and experiences; however, the fact that they are aligned with a political party at the receiving end of brutal oppression by the Hasina regime for 15 years causes concerns regarding perceived bias. The chief prosecutor of the ICT was not only the defence counsel for the Jamaat-e-Islami leaders who were previously tried in the ICT, he also served as junior counsel of the former assistant secretary general of the Jamaat-e-Islami who led the defence counsel team. We need to heed the old adage that justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done.

Fourthly, Sheikh Hasina is currently in India under state protection. The extradition treaty between India and Bangladesh puts an onus on India to extradite Hasina to Bangladesh under prescribed circumstances, unless the extradition is not requested ‘in good faith’ or will not serve ‘interests of justice’. For the reasons enumerated above, it will be wise to refer Hasina and her regime to the jurisdiction of the ICC and negate the possibility of India citing lack of good faith or interests of justice in order to refuse extradition, or worse, granting her a permanent political asylum for those reasons.

Fifthly, the ICC referral process may present itself as a great opportunity to establish a sound and credible factual archive of crimes committed by the fascist Hasina regime for historical records. It will pave the way to form a Truth and Reconciliation Commission without judicial powers to be mandated by the ICC and supported by our local and ICC investigators, UN experts and international human rights organisations to collect, verify, collate and archive evidence of atrocities committed by the Hasina regime. This will not only pave the way for historical evidence for future generations but will also facilitate eventual reconciliation of deep political divides that permeate our society at large. The body of evidence thus gathered and verified can then be utilised by the prosecutors at the ICC to further its prosecution of alleged perpetrators.

Karim Khan KC, the chief prosecutor at the ICC, has met chief adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus and expressed his willingness to cooperate with the interim government. However, the ICC at this stage is unlikely to proceed with its investigation into crimes against humanity perpetrated by the Hasina regime unless voluntarily referred to by the interim government while holding its domestic investigations or prosecutions in abeyance. Because of the issue of admissibility under the Rome Statute by which it is governed, the ICC will not assume jurisdiction in cases where the relevant member state is investigating or prosecuting the alleged perpetrators under its own domestic laws. However, for the sake of international credibility and eventual healing of the deepening fault lines of historical animosity that have divided us since independence, an impartial international conduct of trials by ICC prosecutors at this juncture may well be the most prudent way forward.

Zaki Omar is an international human rights lawyer based in Australia.​
 

Want to leave culture of filing wholesale cases behind: Asif Nazrul

1731454400056.png

Prof Asif Nazrul

Law Affairs Adviser Asif Nazrul today said the government wants to come out of the culture of filing wholesale cases.

"We want to establish true justice. We want to get out of the culture of filing wholesale cases, using the judiciary to harass people, destroying people's livelihoods, and creating continuous grievances, anger, and discord among people," he said while addressing the judges of the High Court Division.

"People come to the judges asking for justice. They [judges] feel embarrassed. Why do you feel embarrassed? The people seeking justice have come to you after finding no justice elsewhere. How can you feel embarrassed?" he asked.

"You felt embarrassed to accept the appeal of the current Chief Advisor Dr Yunus. Why did you feel that way? Isn't this your duty? Isn't it your constitutional duty? You can listen [hold hearing] and reject it. That's not a problem. Your reputation has been tarnished by some judges," added Asif Nazrul.

"Don't say these things anymore. People are not fools," he also said.

"The fascist government started the culture of false and wholecase cases ... Many have been subjected to that," he added.​
 

It’s embarrassing for the govt
Says Asif Nazrul

1731454495341.png


Law Adviser Asif Nazrul yesterday said common people, particularly the political victims and rivals, are still filing wholesale cases against others since August 5, which is embarrassing for the current government.

"During the regime of the fascist government, ghost cases were filed against people. The then government itself used to file such cases," the adviser said.

"Our government is not filing such cases," he said.

Asif Nazrul made the remarks while talking to reporters after a meeting with the members of the judiciary reform commission at the Judicial Administration Training Institute (JATI) in the capital.

Asif Nazrul said he requested the members of the judiciary reform commission to provide suggestions to the government regarding how to deal with this crisis.

He also said the interim government is working to formulate a law for the appointment of High Court judges.

In 2008, an initiative was taken to make a law for the appointment of HC judges, but it was cancelled during the Awami League's regime.

At the meeting, Asif Nazrul appreciated the progress of the judiciary reform commission's activities.

He said the government is optimistic about the commission's way of working despite limitations.

Members of the commission, including its chief, Justice Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman, were present at the meeting.​
 

Limon sues Tarique Siddique, Ziaul Ahsan
United News of Bangladesh . Dhaka 13 November, 2024, 00:46

1731457606049.png

Limon Hossain. | New Age photo.

Limon Hossain, a resident of Jhalakati who lost his leg after being shot by the Rapid Action Battalion, has filed a complaint with the International Crimes Tribunal against nine individuals, including Sheikh Hasina’s former military adviser Tarique Ahmed Siddique and former RAB officer Ziaul Ahsan.

Limon filed the complaint on Tuesday at the office of the tribunal’s chief prosecutor.

Speaking to reporters, he stated that under the fascist Sheikh Hasina government, he was denied justice. In the hope of justice, he filed the complaint with the ICT.

Chief prosecutor Mohammad Tazul Islam informed reporters that multiple complaints were received against Ziaul Ahsan, former director-general of the National Telecommunication Monitoring Centre. Investigators had found evidence linking him to numerous killings and disappearances.

Ziaul Ahsan is currently under arrest on a tribunal order, and permission has been granted for a one-day interrogation.

Limon, son of Tofazzel Hossain from Saturia village in Rajapur, Jhalakathi, was injured in 2011 when he was shot by RAB while retrieving cattle near his home. Due to inadequate treatment, his left leg had to be amputated below the knee, leaving him permanently disabled.​
 

ICT seeks red notice for Hasina’s arrest
Chief prosecutor’s office writes to Interpol through IGP

1731547387475.png

File photo

The chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal has sought an Interpol red notice for the arrest of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

Chief Prosecutor Chief Prosecutor Tajul Islam's office on Sunday wrote to the Interpol through the inspector general of police (IGP).

Hasina is accused of committing crimes against humanity and she is a fugitive, he told reporters in front of his office yesterday, adding that the IGP would forward the letter to the international organisation which facilitates worldwide police cooperation.

"There is an arrest warrant for her [in Bangladesh]…. We requested Interpol to arrest her or at least issue a red notice," he said.

A red notice is a request to law enforcement worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person pending extradition, surrender, or similar legal action, according to the Interpol website.

Over 100 complaints of crimes against humanity have been filed against Hasina, said prosecutors.

Tajul said the tribunal also issued arrest warrants for four absconding police officers on charges of committing atrocities in the capital's Jatrabari during the mass uprising.

"Journalists and citizens filmed how a young man, injured in the leg, was rescued by his colleague and was being taken away, when Zakir Hossain, then officer-in-charge of Jatrabari Police Station, went close to them and shot him in the chest to ensure his death," he said.

The tribunal has also granted permission to the prosecutors to interrogate Maj Gen (sacked) Ziaul Ahsan, now in jail, for a day.

The three-judge panel of the ICT led by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder gave the permission.

The date of Ziaul's interrogation will not be revealed for security concerns, he said.

"He was involved in numerous murders and enforced disappearances. The ICT probe body has evidence," he said.​
 

Submit Hasina case probe report in one month: ICT
M Moneruzzaman 18 November, 2024, 12:31

1731976967346.png

Sheikh Hasina. | File photo

The International Crimes Tribunal on Monday gave the chief prosecutor one more month to complete investigations into two complaints of crimes against humanity filed against deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and 46 of her associates.

The tribunal of Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and retired district judge Md Mohitul Haq Anam Chowdhury, also sought the report by December 17 on the execution of the warrants for the arrest and others issued on October 17.

Chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam informed the court that efforts were under way for an Interpol red notice for Hasina, who fled to India amid the mass uprising on August 5.

The tribunal also ordered 13 of the accused, including 11 senior Awami League leaders, a retired Supreme Court judge and a former bureaucrat, to be shown arrested in the cases filed for crimes committed during the student-people uprising that deposed Hasina on August 5.

The jail authorities produced the 13 before the tribunal for the first time on Monday as per the tribunal order issued on October 17 for their production before it.

They are former ministers Anisul Huq, Faruk Khan, Shahjahan Khan, Kamal Ahmed Mojumder, Dipu Moni and Gazi Golam Dastagir, former state minister Zunaid Ahmed Palak, former prime minister’s advisers Salman F Rahman and Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, Workers Party of Bangladesh president Rashed Khan Menon, Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal—Jasod president Hasanul Haque Inu, retired Appellate Division judge AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury and former home secretary Jahangir Alam.

Senior AL leader Muhammad Abdur Razzaque, another accused in the same case, was not produced before the tribunal as he was in police custody in Tangail on separate charges, according to jail authorities.

Former lawmaker Golam Dastagir, in a helmet, was brought from the Narayanganj District Jail, while Dipu Moni was brought from Kashimpur Women’s Jail in prison vans.

The remaining 11 accused were transported in another prison van.

Unlike Menon and Inu, most of the accused appeared visibly somber as they exited the prison van one by one. Menon smiled while Inu waved to journalists.

Before the proceedings had started, the 12 male accused were kept in the tribunal’s lockup for about an hour. Dipu Moni was, however, kept separately, seated near Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury outside the lockup.

The tribunal proceedings began at about 11:00 am after all 13 accused were placed in the dock inside the courtroom.

The accused were seated in two rows, with Tawfiq, Anisul Huq, Faruk Khan, Menon, Kamal Ahmed Mojumder and Shahjahan Khan occupying the front row.

The back row was taken by Inu, Golam Dastagir, Jahangir Alam, Salman F Rahman, Shamsuddin Chowdhury and Palak.

As the chief prosecutor began reading out the allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and her 45 associates, the 13 accused remained silent throughout the hearing.

Tajul Islam spent nearly an hour narrating the events of the July-August mass uprising, presenting. During his submission, Dipu Moni was seen whispering and reportedly branding Tajui as a ‘good storyteller.’

The prosecution alleged that the crimes against humanity committed during the uprising were orchestrated under direct orders from Hasina, the principal accused. Her associates, including the accused 13, were accused of executing her directives to suppress the student-led protests and maintain her grip on power.

The prosecution detailed various actions attributed to the accused, including incitement and provocation. It further charged Hasina’s associates with both superior responsibility for their leadership roles and individual responsibility for specific acts.

Inu stirred up a commotion when police personnel asked him to sit, responding defiantly that it was ‘his personal matter’. Similarly, when Kamal Ahmed Mojumder attempted to draw the tribunal’s attention to speak something, police personnel intervened, preventing him from addressing the court.

The proceedings began with defense lawyer Ehnanul Haque Shomaji, representing five of the 13, including Anisul Huq, Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury and Faruk Khan.

The chief prosecutor, however, interrupted and informed the tribunal that efforts were under way to appoint Shomaji to the prosecution team, creating a potential conflict of interest.

Responding to the tribunal’s query, Shomaji stated that he was not officially informed of any appointment and refrained from making submissions. He then asked his junior Azizur Rahman Dulu to represent the accused.

Later, another defense lawyer, Abdul Hossain, appeared on behalf of several accused, including Inu and Dipu Moni.

Inu and Dipu, however, could not identify the lawyer.

The tribunal was established in 2009 during the Awami League government to prosecute individuals accused of war crimes.

Its reconstitution and the current proceedings signal a significant shift as the tribunal now investigates alleged crimes against humanity linked to the 2024 mass uprising and the political fallout that followed.

The charges stem from the violent suppression of the mass movement that led to the collapse of Hasina government.​
 

ICT Act being amended with provision to ban political parties
Pradip Sarkar
Dhaka
Published: 18 Nov 2024, 19: 16

1731979070964.png

International Crimes Tribunal Prothom Alo File Photo

A draft amendment to the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act has been prepared with a provision to ban political parties, along with several other issues.

According to the draft, if a party or organisation is found guilty of crimes against humanity such as murder, enforced disappearances, or torture, the registration of that party or organisation can be suspended or canceled.

The interim government is currently reviewing these proposed amendments further.

However, some lawyers have raised questions about the proposal to ban political parties.

They pointed out that there is already a separate law that allows the banning of political parties.

They also think introducing this provision in the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act could lead to controversy.

On 5 August, the Awami League government fell amid the student-people's uprising. According to the government, 874 people died during the movement.

Allegations of genocide were raised against the ousted leadership of the Awami League. The current interim government has taken steps to prosecute those accused of genocide and enforced disappearances that occurred during the Awami League regime at the International Crimes Tribunal.

Preliminary proceedings have begun under the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act of 1973, and steps are also being taken to amend the law.

Government sources said that the final version of the proposed amendments will be issued as an ordinance within a short time as there is currently no parliament. The proposed ordinance will be called the International Crimes (Tribunal) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2024.

The International Crimes (Tribunal) Act, 1973 was enacted to prosecute individuals involved in crimes against humanity during the 1971 liberation war.

Under this law, the top leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami were prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the 1971 war.

A draft amendment was previously prepared during the Awami League government's tenure, which included a provision to ban political parties found guilty of such crimes. However, that amendment was not finalised at the time.

In the final years of the Awami League's rule, the party banned Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir, under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The interim government later lifted those bans.

Now, under the interim government, the Awami League leadership is being prosecuted in the International Crimes Tribunal.

Why controversy?

One of the major amendments to the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act is to include a provision to ban political parties.

The draft proposal said that if any organisation commits, assists, or incites crimes against humanity, such as murder, enforced disappearances, or torture, the registration of the organization can be suspended or canceled for a specific period.

However, the exact duration of suspension or cancellation has not been mentioned in the draft. The tribunal can also impose other appropriate penalties on the organisation. The amendment also includes a provision allowing political parties to appeal against the tribunal's verdict.

Some lawyers have questioned the inclusion of the provision to ban political parties in the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act.

They said that there is already a separate law with provisions to ban political parties. 'The Political Parties Ordinance, 1978', which clearly defines when and how a political party can be banned.

Speaking to Prothom Alo, lawyer Jyotirmoy Barua said 'The Political Parties Ordinance, 1978', clearly said when and how the government can cancel or ban a political party.

While explaining the law, the lawyer said the government can refer a case to the High Court with the reasons for banning a party. The High Court then holds hearings and can decide whether to cancel the party's registration or take other actions.

Barua believes that adding this provision to the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act could lead to unnecessary controversy, given that there is already a clear legal framework in place.

Expanding definition of crimes

The amendment also proposes expanding the definition of crimes against humanity. Under the existing law, crimes such as murder, abduction, torture, rape, slavery, extermination, confinement, detention or other inhuman acts are considered crimes against humanity.

The proposed amendment seeks to include additional offences such as forced disappearance, sexual slavery, forced prostitution, forced pregnancy, and forced sterilization.

The amendment also proposes that commanders or senior officers who issue orders or approve such crimes, as well as those directly involved in committing them, should be prosecuted. The proposal expands this to include leaders of political parties, in addition to military commanders and senior officials.

Some lawyers argue that the amendments are primarily focused on prosecuting crimes committed during the rule of the ousted Awami League government, particularly those crimes carried out during that time.

However, government officials disagree, saying that the amendments aim to clarify ambiguities in the existing law and broaden the scope of prosecution for crimes against humanity.

Expanding the jurisdiction

The existing International Crimes (Tribunal) Act only covers crimes committed within Bangladesh's territory. The amendment, however, proposes extending jurisdiction to include crimes committed in Bangladesh’s territorial waters. It also proposes that if any Bangladeshi citizen commits crimes against humanity abroad, they can be prosecuted under this law. Similarly, if a foreign national commits crimes against humanity within Bangladesh's territory or territorial waters, they can also be prosecuted under this law.

Lawyer Jyotirmoy Barua said as criminal offences are being included in this act, it will allow for the prosecution of both domestic and foreign nationals for crimes committed within their jurisdiction. Such provisions are common in other countries.

Audio-video evidence will be accepted

The amendment also proposes that audio and video recordings related to crimes against humanity be accepted as evidence in tribunal hearings.

Investigators will have the authority to conduct searches and seize documents. Representatives of the United Nations or other international organizations with permission will be allowed to participate in hearings, investigations, and other proceedings.

Victims or their representatives will also be allowed to participate in tribunal proceedings. The amendment also includes provisions to ensure the safety of witnesses.

Despite repeated attempts, law adviser Asif Nazrul could not be contacted to take his comment about the government’s initiative to amend the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act.

The attorney general, Mohammad Asaduzzaman, also declined to comment on the matter.

However, the chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal, Mohammad Tajul Islam, told the Prothom Alo that the proposed amendments aim to clarify certain ambiguities in the law and that this will help expedite judicial proceedings.

*This report, originally published in Prothom Alo print and online editions, has been rewritten in English by Rabiul Isalm​
 

Tribunal can recommend actions against political parties: Law adviser
Special Correspondent
Dhaka
Published: 19 Nov 2024, 17: 27

1732067040321.png

Law adviser Asif NazrulFile photo

The tribunal has the authority to recommend punitive actions against political parties accused of crimes against humanity.

It can make these recommendations to authorities concerned.

A proposal for the amendment of the International Crimes (Tribunal) Ordinance has been drafted with such a provision.

The draft will be placed for approval at the advisory council meeting to be held on Wednesday.

Law adviser Asif Nazrul disclosed this information in response to a question from a newsperson in a press conference on the evaluation of the law ministry in the first 100 days of the interim government at the secretariat today, Tuesday.

Law adviser Asif Nazrul highlighted the activities conducted by his ministries in the first 100 days after the interim government took over.

Referring to the legal reform initiatives they have undertaken, the law adviser said, “Several human rights agencies had pointed out some major flaws in the International Crimes Tribunal Act – 1973. The civil societies also have raised their voices in this regard over time. The government took the initiatives to amend the relevant laws to align them with international standards. At the same time the government also wanted to ensure justice through these. There have been extensive consultations regarding this. We have tried to carry out an extraordinary amendment which would enhance the importance, rationality and acceptability of the trial by manifolds.”

The law adviser further said the draft of the amendment would be placed in the advisory council meeting on Wednesday. It will be in effect within Thursday if the council approves this on Wednesday, he said.

In response to a query regarding whether the provision of imposing a ban on political parties included in the amendment or not, Asif Nazrul said, “Wait another day and you will see it yourself. First, the amendments need the approval of the advisory council.”

In response to further questions regarding this, the law adviser said, “The court has not been given the power directly in the proposal. The proposal says if the court feels then it can recommend punitive actions against any political party accused of crimes against humanity. They will recommend the bodies concerned regarding this.”

Further explaining the matter, he said, “The proposal hasn’t specified the list of the authorities concerned who have the jurisdiction to take actions against any political party such as the election commission and the home ministry. If the council wants, there is room for further works in this regard.”

“It’s not that the court will definitely punish the accused party. It only can recommend actions if it feels. This provision has been included in the draft. But it completely depends on the advisory council as to whether they will keep that provision or not.”

In response to another question, Asif Nazrul clarified that the new provision is regarding the trial of political parties.​
 

Amended ICT act: No provision for punishing any political party
Death sentence remains

The amended International Crimes Tribunal Act will not include provisions for punishing political parties or any other organisations, or for recommending such punishments, Law Adviser Prof Asif Nazrul said yesterday.

It will have provisions for appealing to the Appellate Division, and allowing parties to raise questions about a case before the trial concludes, he said at a press briefing at the Foreign Service Academy yesterday.

"This is called interlocutory appeal. It would permit parties to challenge the continuation of the trial in the tribunal. Also, if the tribunal brings contempt of court charges against any party, it can move the Appellate Division for interlocutory redress."

He also confirmed that the death penalty provision in the ICT Act will remain unchanged.

"We have clearly told those calling for removal of this provision that we don't have the scope to abolish it…. We have not ratified the international treaty that calls for abolishing such sentences. So, we are not obligated."

The advisory council approved the draft of the amended act during a meeting at the Secretariat yesterday, with Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus in the chair.

Asif said the interim government thought of making necessary amendments to the ICT Act due to criticism of the law.

The government has consulted national and international legal experts and the stakeholders to amend the law.

The adviser said the draft of the law included a provision for punishing political parties and other organisations, as well as allowing the tribunal to recommend such punishments.

"However, the council of advisers thought that if the provision for punishing a political party or any other organisation is included, it could lead to unnecessary questioning of the law. So, we chose not to include the provision.

"If there is any need to ban any political party or organisation, it could be done through other related laws, such as the electoral law and the anti-terrorism law."

The amended ICT Act will be become a law once the draft is published in a gazette, he said.

The interim government initiated the process of amending the act as over 1,600 cases were lodged under different laws, including the ICT Act, over different crimes committed during the July uprising. The International Crimes Tribunal has also been reformed.

According to Asif, the definitions of crimes against humanity and genocide in the draft of the ICT (Amendment) Act have also been revised based on the Rome Statute, to which Bangladesh is a party.

"More rights have been provided to the accused so that the accused and the complainants enjoy equal rights. They can bring in as many witnesses as they deem necessary, and question the acceptability of the prosecution witnesses."

The adviser said the amended act will also have provisions for protecting witnesses and providing compensation to the affected people.

"The tribunal can also make audiovisual recording of the trial and broadcast part of it without compromising the privacy of the people concerned," the law adviser said.

Three agencies that can be put on trial under the law include the "disciplined forces", intelligence agencies and auxiliary forces. The definitions of these have also been made clearer, he added.

He said any party in a particular case can also appoint foreign lawyers. Besides, local and foreign observers will be able to observe trials.

Asked if representatives from the indigenous or other minority communities will be included in the Constitution Reform Commission, Adviser Mahfuj Alam said a decision in this regard is yet to be made.

However, the commission has already consulted various groups including the indigenous communities, he added.

Mahfuj also called on the students to share their concerns and demands with the government through proper channels.

Referring to student protests over various issues, he urged the students to avoid being influenced by provocations or engaging in actions that could be detrimental.

"The government is always open to dialogue," he said.

Local Government Adviser Asif Mahmud and Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam also spoke.​
 
আন্তর্জাতিক অপরাধ ট্রাইব্যুনাল আইনে রাজনৈতিক দল নিষিদ্ধের বিধান থাকছে না: আইন উপদেষ্টা

 

Toby Cadman appointed 'special prosecutor adviser' to ICT

1732146932070.png

Photo: Collected

Toby Cadman, a top human rights lawyer and the joint head of the London-based Guernica 37 law firm, has been appointed as a special prosecutorial adviser to the International Crimes Tribunal, Bangladesh.

"I am delighted and deeply honoured to announce that I have been appointed as a Special Prosecutor Advisor to the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh," Toby Cadman, also an extradition specialist, yesterday posted on his X, formerly Twitter, account.

On September 2, he met Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus at the state guest house Jamuna.

During the meeting, they discussed the need to establish a domestic tribunal with international support to try people accused of committing crimes against humanity during the student-led revolution, according to a BSS report.

"Bangladesh quickly needs to establish an effective domestic legal framework for truth, justice, and accountability that was properly supported by the international community and endorsed by the people of Bangladesh," the chief adviser's press wing quoted Cadman as saying.

Cadman said they were ready to support Bangladesh to develop a framework for the extradition of persons involved in crimes against humanity, economic crimes, and political corruption who fled the country with their ill-gotten assets. He also presented a number of proposals to the chief adviser.​
 

ICT seeks probe report by Dec 19
M Moneruzzaman 20 November, 2024, 14:52

1732149408673.png

Former Inspector General of Police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun is brought to International Crimes Tribunal on Wednesday. | New Age photo

The International Crimes Tribunal on Wednesday asked the investigation agency to conclude in a month its probe into allegations of crimes against humanity brought against eight former high-profile law enforcement officials, including former inspector general of police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun.

The tribunal of Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and Md Mohitul Haq Anam Chowdhury asked the investigators to submit the investigation report by December 19.

It also ordered the authorities concerned to detain the accused in custody and produce them before the tribunal on December 19.

The prosecution alleged that Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, along with seven other high-ranking officials, orchestrated and facilitated crimes against humanity during the 36-day student-led anti-discrimination movement in the capital and its outskirts between July 1 and August 5.

The accused include retired army major general Ziaul Ahsan, also former director general of the National Telecommunication Monitoring Centre, former Dhaka MEtropolitan Police deputy commissioner for Mirpur division Md Jasim Uddin Mollah, former Dhaka superintendent of police Abdullah Al Kafi, ex-additional superintendent of police for Savar circle Md Shahidur Islam, former officers-in-charge Mazharul Islam Kazal (Gulshan police station) and Abdul Hasan (Jatrabari police station), and former Detective Branch inspector Md Arafat Hossain.

All the accused but Jasim and Shahidur were produced for the first time before the reconstituted tribunal established by the Awami League government in 2009 to try individuals for crimes against humanity committed during the War of Independence.

Their production came days after the tribunal on Monday ordered the detention of 11 high-profile politicians, a retired Supreme Court judge, and a former bureaucrat on similar charges related to the July-August 2024 massacre.

The tribunal on Monday ordered investigators to expedite the probe into the allegations of crimes against humanity brought against 46 individuals, including deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and Awami League general secretary Obaidul Quader.

The tribunal also asked the chief prosecutor to execute its October 17 warrant for the arrest of Hasina and submit a compliance report on December 17, the next date for hearing.

Chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam outlined the prosecution case on Wednesday accusing the law enforcement officials of suppressing the student movement through coordinated violence that resulted in 1,500 deaths and 25,000 injuries.

Tajul emphasised that Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, as the chief of law enforcement, held ‘superior responsibility’ for the alleged crimes.

He argued that instead of preventing the violence, Mamun directed forces to quash the demonstrations.

He leveled sharp criticism at Mamun, accusing him of being the ‘chief commander of Sheikh Hasina’s fascist regime’ until her ouster in the student-led mass uprising on August 5.

Ziaul Ahsan, former NTMC director general, faces grave accusations, including intercepting and leaking private communications of opposition leaders during the movement.

Prosecutors alleged that Ziaul orchestrated an internet and WhatsApp blackout during the protests, effectively crippling communication among demonstrators.

Tajul further accused Ziaul of facilitating operations of Aynaghoor, a clandestine detention centre of enforced disappearances.

Tajul contended that Ziaul’s tenure at the Rapid Action Battalion marked the onset of widespread enforced disappearances, murders, and extrajudicial killings.

Ziaul played a pivotal role in orchestrating enforced disappearances, yet he continued to hold influential government positions despite these allegations, Tajul said, adding that Ziaul publicly opposed the student-led movement through posts on his verified Facebook page.

Ziaul, however, denied the allegations, stating that the internet disruptions were mandated by the government and that his role at the NTMC was limited to overseeing its creation under the Bangladesh Telecommunications Regulatory Commission.

He also denied his involvement in Aynaghoor.

During the tribunal proceedings, Ziaul attempted to speak in his defense but was stopped by the presiding judge, reminding him that his lawyer would address the tribunal on his behalf.

Ziaul was told that he would be allowed to speak after his lawyer’s submission if necessary.

Ziaul instructed his lawyers, MI Farooqui and Nazneen Nahar—his younger sister—to request permission for him to have pen and paper to take notes during the proceedings.

At one point, Ziaul rebuked on-duty police officers when they attempted to restrain him and asked him to stop engaging with bystanders in the courtroom.

At the beginning of Wednesday’s proceedings, the defense team for Ziaul submitted an application questioning the tribunal’s authority to hear cases related to the July-August events under the International Crimes Tribunal Act.

The application was, however, withdrawn after the prosecution argued that it had not been properly filed or submitted to the tribunal.

The tribunal instructed Ziaul’s lawyers to refile the application through the registrar’s office. The matter will be scheduled for a hearing two weeks after proper submission.

Former Gulshan police officer-in-charge Mazharul Islam broke down in court, pleading with the judges to recognise his efforts to support students during the protests.

He later calmed down when the prosecution read out the incidents of killings of five people in fire under his jurisdiction during the movement.

The presiding judge assured the accused, stating, ‘If you are innocent, you will receive justice.’

Six other police officers remained silent while the prosecution read out their roles in attacks on demonstrators during the movement.

Abdul Hossain appeared for accused police Abdul Hasan and Arafat Hossain.

Jasim Uddin Mollah was represented by Mahbubur Rahman, and Mazharul Islam was defended by Mustavi Hasan.​
 

Amended ICT law to allow trial of security personnel
Concerns about the international crimes tribunals act amendment

1732492145059.png

VISUAL: ANWAR SOHEL

The newly amended International Crimes (Tribunals) Act will allow for the prosecution of members of the army, navy, air force, police, Rapid Action Battalion, Border Guard Bangladesh and all intelligence agencies.

A gazette was issued to this effect yesterday.

"'Intelligence agency" means any "authority, force or entity, established by or under any law which is responsible for the collection, analysis and exploitation of information in support of law enforcement, national security and public safety", specified the amendment.

The amended law says, "The provisions of this article shall apply only to persons in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State."

The newly amended law also provides explicit instructions to protect accused and detained persons from torture and forcible detention, and orders all accused to be brought to the tribunal within 24 hours of arrest. The accused and detained will have legal rights to protection under the Torture and Custodial Death (Prevention) Act, 2013.

"Evidence obtained by means of a violation of internationally recognised human rights shall not be admissible."

The law also mandates that the prosecution must disclose to the defence any evidence in its possession that portrays that an accused person may be innocent. The defence can present evidence or additional witnesses at any stage of the trial.

The amended law also specified the scope of culpability for crimes against humanity.

It detailed that those who can be tried include not only those who have ordered, solicited, incited or assisted in the commission of the crimes specified in the law, but also those who had knowledge that the crime was to be committed. The contribution must be "intentional", says the law.

"However, a person who abandons the effort to commit the crime or otherwise prevents the completion of the crime shall not be liable to punishment under this Statute for the attempt to commit that crime if that person completely and voluntarily gave up the criminal purpose," added the law.

The modified law stated that any commander, superior officer or leader who "fails to take necessary measures to prevent the commission of such crimes" or "consciously disregarded information which clearly indicated that the subordinates were committing or about to commit such crimes, is guilty of these crimes".

A provision has been included in the law that will allow the tribunal to award monetary compensation to victims.

The law also allows publication of court proceedings for transparency. The tribunal has been allowed to make the decision to record the hearings and broadcast audio-visual recordings as long as the safety, privacy and dignity of the participants are protected.

"Representatives of United Nations bodies and agencies, as well as national or international human rights organisations, may attend public hearings, trials and other proceedings," said the law.

The chief prosecutor of the tribunal will brief the press about the amended law today.​
 

Another complaint filed with ICT against Hasina

1732492287633.png

File photo

Another complaint has been filed with the chief prosecutor at the International Crimes Tribunal against former prime minister Sheikh Hasina and 43 others, accusing them of committing genocide and crimes against humanity during a Hefajat-e-Islam rally in the capital's Motijheel Shapla Chattar on May 5, 2013.

It was filed yesterday by Iffat Ara, the mother of Rehan Ahsan, a former student of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (Buet) who was killed during the 2013 rally, said her lawyer, SM Tasmirul Islam .

Besides the former PM, her defence adviser Tariq Ahmed Siddiqui, then home minister Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir, leaders of Awami League and its alliance are named in the complaint. It also named top law enforcement officials, including then Police IGP, Rab director general, and DMP commissioner who allegedly led the joint operation that day.

Speaking to the media, Tasmirul said Rehan was shot dead on the night of May 5, 2013, near the Mohammedan Sporting Club, located next to Shapla Chattar. His body was later found in the morgue of Dhaka Medical College Hospital.

Rehan's family didn't even receive his autopsy report despite making several requests, he added.

Rehan's mother, Iffat Ara, said, "I had truly given up hope that I would ever be able to get to fight for justice. After the political change on August 5, I found the courage to file this case."

At the time of his death, Rehan, 23, was a third-year student in the computer science and engineering department.​
 

Hefazat files genocide case against Hasina, 49 others
Staff Correspondent 26 November, 2024, 17:26

1732666744231.png

Sheikh Hasina | BSS photo

The Hefazat-e-Islam Bangladesh on Tuesday filed a complaint with the International Crimes Tribunal accusing deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and 49 others of genocide and crimes against humanity during the crackdown on its sit-in at Shapla Chattar in Dhaka on May 5-6, 2013.

The complainant, Hefazat joint secretary general Moulana Azizul Haque Islamabadi, without mentioning the number of deaths during the incident, alleged that the law enforcers fired 54,000 bullets in the midnight operation to disperse the protesters resulting in genocide.

Azizul claimed that the operation named as ‘flush-out mission’ involved excessive use of force, including indiscriminate firing on Hefazat supporters.

Azizul was accompanied by Hefazat senior joint secretary general and Dhaka metropolitan unit president Junaid Al Habib and former joint secretary general Muhammad Mamunul Haque, now secretary general of Bangladesh Khelafat Majlish, during the filing of the complaint.

The three leaders had previously been detained in connection with the 2013 mayhem and were later released on bail. They are, however, facing a number of cases filed by the police for the 2013 incidents.

Emerging from the tribunal, Junaid Al Habib referred to Hasina’s statement in the parliament at the time that law enforcers fired 54,000 bullets during the operation.

‘Imagine how many lives were lost,’ he said, while pointing to international media reports and video footage of reported removal of bodies by trucks.

Hefazat leaders reiterated their demand for justice, accusing the government of using excessive force against peaceful protesters and filing false cases against them to suppress dissent.

The 2013 Shapla Chattar crackdown remained one of the most controversial events in Bangladesh’s political history, with allegations of human rights violations and disputes over the actual number of casualties.

With the latest Hefazat case, Hasina, who fled to India in the face of a student-led mass uprising on August 5, along with her associates, is facing at least 20 cases filed on charges of genocide and crimes against humanity. She faces a warrant of arrest in one of the cases.

The accused named in the Hefazat complaint, include Hasina, former home minister Muhiuddin Khan Alamgir, senior AL leaders Sheikh Selim, Mahbubul Alam Hanif, Bahauddin Nasim, Md Abdur Razzaque, Hasan Mahmud and Mridul Kanti Das, former AL leader Abdul Latif Siddique, former minister and Workers Party of Bangladesh president Rashed Khan Menon, deposed prime minister Hasina’s defence adviser Tarique Ahmed Siddique, former inspector generals of police AKM Shohidul Hoque and Benazir Ahmed, former Detective Branch chief Harun-or-Rashid, former Dhaka Metropolitan Police deputy commissioner Biplob Kumar Sarker, former Rapid Action Battalion’s intelligent wing commander Ziaul Ahsan, the then Border Guard Bangladesh director general, Abdul Aziz Khan, journalist and writer Shahriar Kabir, historian and former Dhaka University professor Muntasir Mamun, Bangladesh Chhatra League former present Badiuzzaman Sohag and the then BCL general secretary Nazmul Alam and the then Juba League president.

On May 5, 2013, widespread violence erupted at Shapla Chattar in Motijheel during a rally organised by Hefazat-e-Islam to press for its 13-point demand.

The rally culminated in a midnight ‘flush-out operation’ by law enforcers to clear the area, resulting in clashes that extended beyond Dhaka to seven districts, including Narayanganj, Bagerhat, and Brahmanbaria.

The crackdown remained one of the most contentious events in Bangladesh’s recent history.

Human rights organisation Odhikar conducted a fact-finding mission and reported 61 deaths resulting from the operation in May 5-6.

The organisation’s report accused the security forces of committing a massacre, sparking significant domestic and international criticism.

In retaliation, the Awami League government targeted Odhikar, filing charges under section 57 of the Information and Communication Technology Act, 2006, against its secretary Adilur Rahman Khan, now an adviser to the interim government, and its director ASM Nasiruddin Elan. Both were arrested, jailed, and later acquitted on appeal by the High Court.

On August 20, 2024, another complaint was filed with the International Crimes Tribunal accusing Sheikh Hasina and 23 others of genocide and crimes against humanity during the Hefazat rally. The complaint was lodged by ICT prosecutor and former defense lawyer Gazi MH Tamim on behalf of Hefazat joint secretary general for education and law Mufti Harun Ijahar Chowdhury.​
 

Govt willing to try Hasina, allies at ICC: Prof Yunus
ICC prosecutor assures help to International Crimes Tribunal

1732752798813.png

Photo: CA's Press Wing

Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus yesterday said his government intends to pursue charges of crimes against humanity against the Sheikh Hasina regime at the International Criminal Court for the massacre they committed during the July mass uprising and the cases of enforced disappearances during her 16-year rule.

He said this while ICC prosecutor Karim A Khan visited him at the State Guest House Jamuna in Dhaka on Wednesday.

In response, Karim A Khan said the ICC would like to extend cooperation to the International Crimes Tribunal, the Bangladesh court, which is dealing with the cases related to crimes committed during the mass uprising, according to the chief adviser's press wing.

The ICT has already issued an arrest warrant against Sheikh Hasina and members of her political party.

Separately, a senior lawyer of ICC said the international court is ready to assist ICT if requested by Bangladesh.

"The ICC has always said that it is available to assist states in terms of technical support, training, and guidance when requested," said Essa Mbye Faal while responding to a question at a press briefing in Dhaka.

"With this level of cooperation, if Bangladesh were to seek assistance, the Office would be more than happy to oblige," said the ICC lawyer.

During the talks in the state guest house Jamuna, the chief adviser and the ICC prosecutor also discussed the Rohingya crisis, the situation in Myanmar, and humanitarian efforts for the Rohingyas.

The prosecutor informed the chief adviser that his office has formally sought an arrest warrant against Min Aung Hlaing, the chief of the Myanmar military government, for crimes against humanity regarding the treatment of the Rohingyas.

Karim Khan backed the chief adviser's call to hold a special global conference on the Rohingya crisis which the UN General Assembly has agreed to hold the conference in 2025. He said he hoped a new direction to a sustainable resolution to the crisis would be found at the conference.

The chief adviser said the conference would bring all the international stakeholders to a table to seek a durable solution to the crisis, especially the plight of the Rohingyas and their young children in the camps in Bangladesh.

"We have to make sure that it does not explode," Professor Yunus said, referring to the young people growing up without hope in the camps.

The chief adviser reiterated his recent call for a safe zone inside the Rakhine state of Myanmar to aid displaced people and address the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

"The safety of the zone should be guaranteed by the UN. When the fighting stops, people who live in the safe zone can easily return to their localities," he said.

Khaliliur Rahman, the High Representative on Rohingya affairs, Lamiya Morshed, principal coordinator of the SDGs affairs, and Riaz Hamidullah, the additional secretary of the foreign ministry, were present during the meeting.

Earlier, the High Representative on Rohingya Affairs, Khalilur Rahman, hosted a luncheon for the ICC prosecutor and the members of his ICC team.

"Bangladesh is among the first Asian signatories to the Rome Statute establishing the ICC, and we look forward to further deepening our cooperation in the coming days," Rahman said.​
 

Flawed, wholesale cases may hinder justice
Tanzil Rahaman 30 November, 2024, 23:56

1733013380666.png


The filing of flawed and wholesale cases over the murders of and attacks on protesters during the student-people uprising is likely to hinder justice and pave the way for perpetrators to escape punishment.

Police headquarters officials said that over 2,500 cases were filed over the incidents of murders and attacks during the mass uprising till mid-November.

They also said that about 8,000 people were arrested in mass uprising cases till October 31.

The investigation into the cases excepting those filed with the International Crimes Tribunal remains slow in three months and a half of the ouster of the regime of Sheikh Hasina by the uprising on August 5.

The flaws in cases include naming people who have died or are living out of the country, showing people alive as killed during the uprising and many more inconsistencies, said law enforcement officials dealing with the cases.

In some cases, the plaintiffs do not know the people named in the cases and allegations have it that some students and political people have prepared the complaints to frame their opponents.

‘I do not know the people named in the case as students and lawyers drafted the complaint and I was asked to put my signature on it,’ said Abdul Matin, the father of schoolboy Abdul Motalib, who was allegedly killed in police firing at Jigattala in the capital on August 4.

Matin filed the case with the Dhanmandi police station against 176 people, including deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan, former jute and textile minister Jahangir Kabir Nanak and former shipping minister Shajahan Khan, on August 26.

Matin alleged that neither Zainul Haque Sikder Women’s Medical College and Hospital provided him with a death certificate nor the police ensured the postmortem examination after more than three months of his son’s death.

Matin, a day labourer, said that police officers told him that the body of his son Motalib, a Class VIII student of Moneshwar Government Primary School at Hazaribagh, would be exhumed after the rainy season.

‘I informed the investigation officer about a month ago but he did not contact me so far,’ he added.

Home adviser retired lieutenant general Jahangir Alam Chowdhury said, ‘We are taking necessary legal steps so that no false or fictitious case is filed.’

After the 4th advisory council meeting on law and order on November 24, he also said that the government formed a committee to prevent harassment of the people named in false cases.

On November 13, law adviser Asif Nazrul said that it was embarrassing for the interim government that dubious and unsubstantiated cases were being filed.

He said that they had sought advice from the Judiciary Reform Commission to address the issues legally.

Bangladesh Nationalist Party Dutpara union unit general secretary Nurul Amin filed a murder case with the Araihazar police station on August 22 accusing deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and 130 others.

The plaintiff accused Hasina and 130 others of killing Md Babul Mia, 49, during the mass uprising on August 4, although Babul died of a stroke at DKMC Hospital Ltd at Rupganj on June 3.

The deceased Babul Mia, was a driver’s assistant at Meghla Paribahan and then became the owner of three buses of the company.

Before death, Babul Mia was reportedly campaigning as a candidate for the BNP’s labour body Sramik Dal’s Araihazar upazila unit president.

‘My husband fell sick in the morning on June 3, we took him to the DKMC Hospital where he died on the day and the hospital doctors declared that he died of a stroke,’ victim’s wife Monira Sarker said.

She said that she did not know Nurul Amin, 43, who filed the case.

Araihazar police station officer-in-charge Md Enayet Hossian said that they were investigating the case.

‘Anyone can file a case but we can say if it is false or not after investigation,’ he added.

An attempt to murder case has been filed against 180 people, including Supreme Court lawyer and rights organisation Ain o Salish Kendra chairman ZI Khan Panna, for an attack on a youth, Ahadul Islam, on July 19.

Ahadul’s father Md Baker filed the case with the Khilgaon police station in Dhaka on October 17.

On October 21, Baker, however, petitioned Khilgaon police station officer-in-charge Md Daud Hossain requesting him to drop Panna from the case amid huge criticisms.

Baker, hailed from Mehendiganj in Barishal, claimed that the Supreme Court lawyer was mistakenly implicated in the case due to the former’s ignorance.

The officer-in-charge instructed subinspector Imran Hossain to take appropriate steps.

The senior lawyer also secured an anticipatory bail in the case on October 21.

Supreme Court lawyer and rights activists Sara Hossain said that vexatious cases were being filed by individuals and private parties, but state agencies — police and courts — kept processing arrests, rejecting bail and remanding people in custody.

‘We have seen such misrule under many different administrations but this is the time to make a change from the past, not to repeat what has been done before,’ said Sara.

She suggested that a high-level body should be established by the government with experts to oversee the process of justice and accountability for the cases relating to the uprising.

‘This means curbing the filing of wholesale cases, ensuring investigation by an independent and high-level team, scrutinising the cases to screen out vexatious cases, establishing a policy and priorities for prosecution,’ she added.

Three deceased Awami League leaders — Cumilla south city AL former forest and environment affairs secretary Abdul Momin, its former agriculture affairs secretary Md Kamal Uddin Majumdar, and former member Wahidur Rahman Farid — have been accused of attack on the recent anti-discrimination student protests in Cumilla.

Comilla Sadar south model police station officer-in-charge Mohammad Rafiqul Islam said, ‘The matter will be investigated and If deceased people are found to be named in the case, they will be dropped.’

Student Movement Against Discrimination coordinator and Cumilla University student Md Emran filed the case against 96 people, including former finance minister AHM Mustafa Kamal’s younger brother and former upazila chairman Golam Sarwar and former upazila chairman Abdul Hai Bablu as prime accused.

Abu Sayeed, son of Abdul Momen who died on June 24 after being hit by a train, said, ‘My father died in June and how could he participate in the August 4 attack?’

Kamal Uddin Mazumder died of a heart attack on July 11, 2023, his neighbour Aminul Islam said, terming prosecution of a dead person highly reprehensible.

Farhad, son of Wahidur Rahman Farid, said that his father died of kidney disease in September 2023.

‘It is extremely unfair to name a man who died a year ago in a case for an incident taking place a year later,’ he said.

The police arrested Kulsum Begum on November 21 on the charge of filing a false case claiming her husband’s death during the mass uprising.

Kulsum filed the murder case against 130 people with the Dhaka Chief Judicial Magistrate Court on October 24, claiming that her husband Al Amin, 34, was shot dead while taking part in a procession at Ashulia on August 5.

A team of Ashulia police station, acting on a tip-off, arrested Kulsum and two of her accomplices Ruhul Amin and Shafikul Islam in Cox’s Bazar on Thursday.

Ashulia police station recorded a first information report over the complaint on November 8.

The Police Headquarters assistant inspector general Enamul Haque Sagar urged people not to worry about false cases and innocent people would not be charged or arrested.

Asked about the slow pace in the investigation, Enamul said, ‘We are conducting the investigations slowly to ensure a proper investigation. We want to ensure justice for the victims and punishment for the perpetrators.’

Professor Muhammad Yunus-led interim government took oath on August 8 following Sheikh Hasina resigned and fled to India amid student mass uprising on August 5.

Many perpetrators in the uprising, including Awami League and its associate bodies leaders and activists, police and bureaucrats are still in hiding.​
 

Former ministers Amu, Qamrul produced before ICT
Published :
Dec 04, 2024 11:48
Updated :
Dec 04, 2024 11:48

1733292432585.png


Former ministers Amir Hossain Amu and advocate Qamrul Islam have been produced before the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) on Wednesday in connection with a genocide case.

They were presented before the court around 10 am, according to the prosecution.

On December 2, the ICT directed the relevant authorities to produce them on 4 December, according to a UNB report.

It has been reported that the duo will be shown arrested in a case filed on charges of crimes against humanity and genocide allegedly committed during the July-August mass uprising.

Qamrul was detained by detectives from the Dhaka Metropolitan Police in Uttara, Dhaka, on November 18.

He was subsequently shown arrested in a case related to the death of businessman Abdul Wadud (45) which occurred on July 19 in the New Market area during the anti-discrimination student movement.

Separately, Amu was apprehended by detectives from a residence in West Dhanmondi on November 6. He has also been implicated in the same case.​
 

New ordinance brings ICT closer to int'l standards, more changes required
David Bergman
Published: 07 Dec 2024, 12: 50

1733556050655.png


A significant omission in the amendments is the failure to remove the provision allowing the Tribunal to impose the death penalty following a guilty verdict Representational image

The ordinance containing the amendments to the International Crimes (Tribunal) Act 1973 has now been published, and those interested in fair and credible trials have both a lot to celebrate, as well as quite a bit to be disappointed in.

However, before looking at both the positive and negative within the new ordinance, it is important to emphasise one significant omission in the amendments– and that is the failure to remove the provision allowing the Tribunal to impose the death penalty following a guilty verdict.

This decision to retain the death penalty will have far reaching negative consequences if the government is seeking international credibility for the trial process.

It believes that the important political constituencies within the country (primarily students and the main political parties, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Jamaat-e-Islami) as well as the popular mood within Bangladesh, is in favour of the death penalty
First, it means that the government and the Tribunal will receive no or very limited assistance from either the United Nations or any European country.

Secondly, the United Nations is unlikely to pass to the Tribunal any evidence that it collected during its fact-finding mission.

Thirdly, many international lawyers who would otherwise assist the prosecution might well be reluctant to take part. Indeed, the decision to keep the death penalty might well impact upon whether Toby Cadman, the special prosecutorial adviser, appointed only recently, remains in his position, though he has not yet commented on this.

Fourthly, some international observers might now decide not to attend.

The government’s justification for retaining the death penalty is that it believes that the important political constituencies within the country (primarily students and the main political parties, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Jamaat-e-Islami) as well as the popular mood within Bangladesh, is in favour of the death penalty. It thinks that any attempt to remove the option of the death penalty would leave it open to the accusation that it is“soft” on the previous Awami League government, a claim that would have very negative political fall-out

However, it is uncertain that the government’s perception of both the popular or political party mood is accurate and, even if it was, the government has made no attempt to have a public conversation about the negative consequences of keeping the death penalty for these trials and to persuade people that its removal was the best way forward.

There has been talk of the government announcing a death penalty moratorium, but if it wanted to gain the significant benefit that would accrue from doing so, the time to announce this would be now, not some time in the future. And the best way would have been through the ordinance.

The positive changes

Putting the death penalty issue to one side, let’s now look at the numerous positive changes contained within the new ordinance – and then consider what changes the government failed to make.

The first series of positive changes relates to the definitions and application of the offence.

One of the key problems with the 1973 ICT Act was that its definition of the offences of Crimes against Humanity and of Genocide did not match their international accepted definitions. So, in relation to the offence of Crimes against Humanity, the Act did not specify that killings had to be “part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population” and that the accused needed“knowledge of the attack”. And in relation to the offence of Genocide, the law allowed the crime to be committed when there was an intention to destroy a “political” group, even though the internationally defined offence did not allow that. Section 4 of the new ordinance now brings the definitions of these offences in line with international law.

The legal changes also have the effect that certain terms within these definitions– such as “enforced disappearance” and “attack”- are the same as those given within the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and that the Tribunal, in determining how to interpret and apply these offences, will “have regard to” an ICC document called the “Elements of Crimes”. Section 5 also incorporates the language of Article 23 of the Rome Statute which sets out how those accused of crimes can be held liable – by “ordering”, “inciting”, “inducing”, “aiding”, “abetting”, or “assisting” an offence or contributing to the offence whilst “acting with a common purpose” with a group of people.These significant changes not only bring the offences in line with international standards and norms but provide greater certainty and clarity for both the prosecution and defence to understand exactly what needs to be proved for the Tribunal to find a person guilty of the crime.

The second category of changes involve evidence. The 1973 Act had allowed “any evidence” to be admitted without providing any opportunity for either the defence or the prosecution to challenge its admission. Section 16 of the new ordinance allows either the defence or the prosecution to challenge the admissibility of evidence if they believe it has “no probative” value or would create “prejudice … to a fair trial or to a fair evaluation of the testimony of a witness.” This again brings the ICT act further in line with international standards and procedure.

In addition to this, section 12 also establishes an obligation on the prosecutor to “disclose … any evidence” in its possession which “shows the innocence of the accused or mitigates the guilt of the accused or which may affect the credibility of the prosecution evidence”. This is an international standard yet prior to this amendment, the ICT imposed no requirement on the prosecutor to disclose any exculpatory evidence.

The third category of changes involves the provision of new rights to the accused. Section 15 of the ordinance sets out a series of new rights including that of being provided “time and facilities for the preparation of the defence and to communicate freely with counsel of the accused’s choosing in confidence”. Section 7 also allows the defence to “call additional witnesses or present further evidence at any stage of the trial.”

The fourth category of positive changes involves a cluster of provisions relating to process. One very important new provision, in section 11 of the ordinance, gives the Tribunal the right to “allow foreign counsel to appear before it”. Allowing foreign counsel, with experience in international criminal law, for use by both the defence and prosecution, should have a very positive impact on both the standard of argument and of the trial. Section 10 also allows representatives of “national or international human rights organisations” to attend the ICT proceedings, a significant positive change, as until now that was only intermittently permitted, and it was at the discretion of the Tribunal registrar.

In addition, section 19 of the ordinance also creates new provisions that requires the Tribunal to “take all necessary measures to ensure the safety, security and well-being” of witnesses and allows the victim the “right to participate in the proceedings where they or their families hold a position contrary to that of the prosecution.” Again, all positive.


The negative

The Ordinance has clearly introduced some important new changes, making the 1973 ICT Act more consistent with international standards. Yet – in addition to the issue of the death penalty, discussed above - the new ordinance does, disappointingly, fail to make some additional important changes. Amongst the omissions are these:

- A proper process of interlocutory appeals: Interlocutory appeals are appeals against judicial decisions before a trial has concluded. All international tribunals have a system to allow such appeals, with some appeals allowed as of right and other appeals permitted following a request to the court.

The ordinance does introduce a new provision that allows a person to make an interlocutory appeal in relation to a conviction for contempt, but it does not allow any other interlocutory appeals against any other judicial decision. So an accused person cannot appeal, for example, the legality of their detentions, alleged bias or inappropriate conduct of a judge, or other decisions involving an issue that would significantly affect the fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings or the outcome of the trial. Interlocutory appeals need not delay trial proceedings, as they can proceed in parallel. The failure to have a proper system of interlocutory appeals is unsatisfactory.

- Protecting the rights of those accused in in absentia trials: The ordinance does not amend the provision in the ICT Act to ensure that in absentia trials – that is when a trial takes place in the absence of the accused - provides appropriate protections to the accused. In absentia trials have generally been seen as incompatible with international human rights standards and so there is significant reluctance on the part of international tribunals in allowing them. The only international tribunal that explicitly allows in absentia trials is the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, which provides this important protection: “In case of conviction in absentia, the accused, if he or she had not designated a defence counsel of his or her choosing, shall have the right to be retried in his or her presence before the Tribunal, unless he or she accepts the judgment.” This provision should have been incorporated into the ICT Act to prevent criticism.

- Superior responsibility: The 1973 Act contains a provision setting out when a “commander, superior officer or leader” is responsible for the conduct of those under their control. However, the Ordinance did not amend this section so that its language is consistent with the wording contained in the Rome Statue. Since, as discussed above, the amended 1973 ICT Act does contain amendments that ensure that the offences and other key terminology in the ICT Act will follow the language of the Rome Statute, it would have made much more sense had this section on “superior and subordinate relationships” been changed in the same way to ensure consistency with other international criminal statutes.

- The 1973 Act contains provisions that allow the Tribunal to take “judicial notice” of two categories of information – “facts of Common Knowledge” and “reports of the United Nations”. This means that the Tribunal can assume that both are true, without them having to be proved to be so.

There is nothing wrong with the Tribunal taking judicial notice of “facts of common knowledge”, something common to other international tribunals - but in the previous proceedings in Bangladesh under the 1973 Act, the Tribunal made very broad rulings on what were “facts of common” knowledge, without seeking the views of either the defence or the prosecution, and these negatively impacted upon the accused. The new ordinance should therefore have amended the ICT Act to properly define what are “facts of common knowledge” and to ensure that both the prosecution and defence are given an opportunity to present their views to the Tribunal before it rules on the matter.

The provision in the 1973 Act allowing the Tribunal to take judicial notice of “reports of the United Nations” is based on the 1945 Nuremberg Charter but it does not exist in any other contemporary statute establishing international criminal tribunals. This provision could have wide-ranging impact on the impending trials in Bangladesh as the UN will soon be publishing a fact-finding report which will make various conclusions. It could well be highly prejudicial to the defence if the Tribunal was simply allowed to take “judicial notice” of conclusions of the UN report, conclusions which would not have been proven beyond reasonable doubt.

The Government should be congratulated on the many changes introduced in the Ordinance, and these should go far in ensuring the process is fair and credible. But further changes are still required to ensure that they this will in fact be the case and to avoid an avalanche of criticism that will undoubtedly come the Tribunal’s way, if it fails to live up to recognisable fair standards.

* David Bergman is a journalist who for many years has written on Bangladesh including on the previous ICT trials.​
 

Try Hasina, Awami League
Families of martyred, forcibly disappeared, those injured during July uprising demand at rally

1733875759580.png


The brother and mother of martyred Sohel Rana, 37, weep as they demand that his body and grave be identified, at a rally organised by Mayer Daak in the capital’s Suhrawardy Udyan. Sohel left home on July 18 to join the students’ movement and went missing. After relentless searches, the family in August learned from DMCH authorities that Sohel died after being injured in the protest and was buried in the Rayerbazar Intellectuals’ Graveyard as an “unclaimed person”. PHOTO: PRABIR DAS

Families of the victims of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and those martyred and maimed in the July mass uprising yesterday demanded that ousted Sheikh Hasina and her party be brought to book.

Marking International Human Rights Day yesterday, Mayer Daak, a platform of the families of enforced disappearance victims, organised a rally at Suhrawardy Udyan in the capital.

Delegates from the United Nations, Jatiya Nagorik Committee, students against discrimination, rights defenders from home and abroad, leaders of the BNP, Jamaat, and Hefazat-e-Islam were on stage.

"We are able to hold an event in an open space on the 76th International Human Rights Day -- something that was not possible before. This is an achievement of 36th July," said noted rights activist Nur Khan, referring to Hasina's fall on August 5.

The killing of Hefazat activists in 2013, enforced disappearances, and extrajudicial killing of opposition activists under Awami League's 15-year rule bear the mark of genocide, he said.

Enforced disappearance victims who were released by the regime kept their ordeal a secret out of fear. Some of them are speaking up now, said Nur Khan.

People spent months and years in the tiny secret detention cells, said the member of the inquiry commission on enforced disappearances.

"They wrote many things on the walls. One of them wrote, 'I love my country'. We now have the opportunity to identify the perpetrators and bring them to justice. We must not miss this."

"We are able to hold an event in an open space on the 76th International Human Rights Day -- something that was not possible before. This is an achievement of July 36."— Nur Khan, noted rights activist.

Jatiya Nagorik Committee Convener Nasir Uddin Patwary said, "Murderers of the Awami League's regime must be brought to justice. Justice first, election later. Unless we ensure justice for the martyred and injured, be it politics, election or something else, there will be failure."

Adviser Nahid Islam said, "The Awami League is a party that stands against humanity. Sheikh Hasina has blood on her hands, just like her father had. Sheikh Mujib established Baksal and violated human rights. Whenever they came to power, they violated human rights. The Awami League's time is up."

Referring to reports that people were blackmailed over cases related to the killings during the uprising, he said, "Students and the public are united against the exploiters and those rehabilitating the Awami League."

Regarding killings at the Bangladesh-India border, he said, "We must speak on the basis of justice and equality. Killings at the border to put pressure on Bangladesh are wrong. I tell India: this is not Sheikh Hasina's Bangladesh. If necessary, we will go to the border. You cannot present Bangladesh in a bad light to the world through lies."

Nahid emphasised the need for unity to hold the Awami League accountable. "Everyone must rise above ideological differences and unite."

Calling for an end to misinformation about Bangladesh in Indian media, he said, "Awami League members attacked minorities during their rule at various times. Despite witnessing this, India remained silent."

Jatiya Nagorik Committee spokesperson Samantha Sharmin said Hasina must face trial both domestically and internationally.

BNP Joint Secretary General Shahid Uddin Chowdhury Anee said, "We endured the horrors of a fascist regime for 15 years… Many among us are torture survivors. I want all involved in the atrocities to be brought to justice."

Student leader Hasnat Abdullah said, "Those who helped former prime minister Sheikh Hasina flee the country must also be found and held accountable."

Many of the AL leaders who fled the country after August 5 have reportedly taken refuge in India.

Hasnat said, "India must not become a haven for terrorists."

Another student leader Sarjis Alam urged police to be cautious, stating that cases are being filed and withdrawn for money over crimes committed in July.

"We will prevent any attempts to carry out extremist acts in the name of religion or ethnicity. We will stand together to stop it," he said.

BNP Standing Committee member Abdul Moyeen Khan said that in July, people "sacrificed their lives to save democracy".

"We need reforms within our own selves… We are united when it comes to the country's independence and sovereignty," he said.

BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir and representatives from Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Robert F Kennedy Human Rights expressed solidarity with the victims in video messages.

Family members broke down in tears as they recounted how their loved ones were taken from them. Children who lost their parents spoke.

Some who suffered life-changing injuries at the hand of police and AL activists attended the event. Many of them had lost sight.

Rasheda Begum, mother of a protester shot dead on July 18, said her son Sohel Rana got shot in Jatrabari. "He was buried as unknown at Rayerbagh graveyard. Will I not get my son's body? My son is not an unclaimed corpse. Why was he buried as an unclaimed body?"

Jamaat leaders Mia Golam Porwar, Hamidur Rahman Azad; Nagorik Oikkyo President Mahmudur Rahman Manna; Ganosamhati Andolon leader Zonayed Saki; Biplobi Workers Party General Secretary Saiful Haque, AB Party member secretary Mojibur Rahman Monju; Hefazat leader Mufti Monir Hossain Kashemi; Nagorik Committee member Akhter Hossain; Hummam Quader Chowdhury, son of BNP leader Salauddin Quader Chowdhury; Huma Khan, senior human rights adviser at the UN Resident Coordinator's Office; and Mayer Daak members Hajera Khatun and Sanjida Islam Tulee spoke at the event.​
 

ICT asks IGP to explain Obaidul Quader’s escape
Staff Correspondent 18 December, 2024, 00:03

1734481198874.png

Obaidul Quader | File photo

The International Crimes Tribunal on Tuesday directed the police chief to explain how Awami League general secretary and former road transport and bridges minister Obaidul Quader managed to leave the country despite an arrest warrant placed on him.

It asked the inspector general of police to submit his detailed explanation within two weeks.

The tribunal, chaired by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder and joined by Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and retired district judge Md Mohitul Haq Anam Chowdhury, issued the order during the hearing of crimes against humanity cases.

The tribunal set February 18 for the submission of the investigation reports and ordered the production of all arrested politicians on the same date for further proceedings.

The cases involve deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and 45 other Awami League leaders, including Quader, over allegations of genocide and crimes against humanity during the July-August mass uprising.

Chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam brought to the tribunal’s attention that Obaidul Quader remained inside the country for months after the arrest warrant was issued by the tribunal.

He demanded clarification from law enforcement agencies on Quader’s whereabouts and the circumstances that allowed him to flee the country.

In response, the tribunal ordered the police to submit a report detailing their actions, Quader’s movements, and the mechanisms that facilitated his escape.

At a separate meeting on the day at the Dhaka Divisional Commissioner’s office, home affairs adviser retired Lieutenant Colonel Jahangir Alam Chowdhury admitted that the government was unaware of Quader’s location following the fall of the Awami League government on August 5.

‘We had no information on his whereabouts. If he was in the country, he would have been arrested,’ Jahangir said, responding to the allegations that Quader was inside the country for three months after the Awami League regime’s fall.

Prosecutor Tazul Islam reminded law enforcement officials of their obligation to uphold the tribunal’s directives, warning that non-compliance would be deemed a breach of duty to the state.

‘There is scope under the law to take action against those who aid or facilitate such escapes. For now, we will refrain from taking that route,’ he cautioned.

Tajul also announced that the prosecution would utilise findings from the ‘disappearance commission’ as evidence in the trial.

The Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearance in its interim report recently submitted to the chief adviser identified Sheikh Hasina as a central figure in orchestrating enforced disappearances and linked her to the July-August killings.

The tribunal granted the prosecution two additional months to complete investigation into the cases against Sheikh Hasina and 45 others. It also instructed the police chief to provide updates on the Interpol’s red notice against Hasina.

The tribunal set February 18 for the submission of the investigation reports and ordered the production of all arrested politicians on the same date.

On Tuesday, 16 high-profile individuals, including former ministers, bureaucrats and a retired justice, were brought before the tribunal. They include—former ministers Anisul Huq, Amir Hossain Amu , Qamrul Islam, Faruk Khan, Abdur Razzaque Khan, Kamal Ahmed Majumder, Golam Dastagir Gazi, Rashed Khan Menon and Hasanul Haq Inu, Dipu Moni, Shajahan Khan, Zunaid Ahmed Polak, and former advisers to the primer minister Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury and Salman F Rahman.

Former justice Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik and former home secretary Jahangir Alam were also produced before the tribunal in connection with the case.​
 

Internet was shut down on Hasina’s orders
Palak confesses at ICT

Zunaid Ahmed Palak, former state minister for posts, telecommunications and information technology, has confessed to deliberately shutting down the internet nationwide during the July uprising on former prime minister Sheikh Hasina's orders.

His testimony was recorded by the International Crime Tribunal's investigation agency following a questioning session held on Wednesday, said Chief Prosecutor Md Tajul Islam while addressing journalists at the tribunal yesterday.

"They [Hasina and Awami League lawmakers] wanted to ensure that Bangladesh was disconnected from the rest of the world to hide the instances of mass killings during the protests," Tajul said.

According to the chief prosecutor, Palak also said he had lied by saying that the internet blackout was caused by a fire incident in data centres in Dhaka's Mohakhali and destruction of telecommunication infrastructure by protesters.

"A WhatsApp group was created with International Internet Gateway service providers. A direct order was communicated through this group to shut down the internet immediately. They were asked to confirm after completion of the order," said Tajul.

Tajul said the interrogation was done in the full presence of lawyers. "There was a glass partition between Palak and the investigation agency, and his lawyers. This is as per the international standard. There is no scope for torture or coercion."

The prosecution was expected to submit a probe report against several government officials, including Maj Gen Ziaul Ahsan, yesterday, but the bench granted them an additional two months.

The bench, led by tribunal chairman Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder and members Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and Judge Md Mohitul Haq Enam Chowdhury, passed the order.​
 

73pc of complaints are related to killings during mass uprising
Pradip Sarkar
Dhaka
Updated: 21 Dec 2024, 14: 37

1734830572723.png

International Crimes TribunalFile photo

The office of chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal has registered more than 180 complaints in the last three months. Analysing some 153 of these complaints, it has been found that 73 per cent of the complaints were lodged over the killings during the mass uprising that ousted the Awami League government after 16 years.

Besides, 23 per cent of the complaints were related to enforced disappearances and killings carried out during the 15-year-rule of the Awami League.

Former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has been named among the accused in 94 of these 153 cases. The accused in these cases also include former Awami League ministers, state ministers, adviser to the former prime minister, former lawmakers, leaders of Awami League and its associate bodies, top leaders of the 14-Party-Alliance, former and serving bureaucrats, former and serving members of law enforcement agencies and former prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal.

These 153 complaints were lodged within 8 September to 4 December. Analysing these complaints, it has been found that 111 of these complaints were filed over killings during the mass uprising. Besides, 38 complaints were filed over enforced disappearances and killing under the rule of Awami League government.

Of the remaining four, one was filed seeking exemption from a case filed over crime against humanity during the liberation war.

Sources at the office of the chief prosecutor say it is not possible to directly file cases over genocide and crime against humanity at the International Crimes Tribunal. The victims have to file complaints at the office of the chief prosecutor first. Besides, complaints can be filed to the investigation agency under the chief prosecutor.

The chief prosecutor has filed a total of seven cases so far with the tribunal. Five of these cases were filed over killings during the mass uprising
According to the rule, the investigation agency under the chief prosecutor’s office verifies the complaints first. If the investigators found evidence supporting the complaint, then the chief prosecutor files cases with the tribunal.

The chief prosecutor has filed a total of seven cases so far with the tribunal. Five of these cases were filed over killings during the mass uprising and two were filed over enforced disappearance.

Sheikh Hasina has been accused of genocide during the uprising, enforced disappearances, killings and crimes against humanity. She has been termed as the ‘nucleus’ of these crimes to the tribunal by chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam.

Obaidul Quader and 44 others were accused in another case filed in connection to the crimes committed during the mass uprising. The other accused in the case include former Awami League ministers, state ministers and lawmakers.

All the complaints are under investigation now. No one will be sued if the complaints are not proven during the primary investigation
BM Sultan Mahmud, Prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal.

In another case, former top officials of law enforcement agencies, including former IGP Abdullah Al-Mamun, were made accused. Besides, former additional superintendent of police (ASP) in Barishal range Md Alep Uddin and former superintendent of police (SP) at the Rangamati Police Special Training School Md Mohiuddin Faruki have been accused in two cases filed over enforced disappearances.

The Awami League government was forced to resign in the face of a mass uprising of students and people on 5 August. The trials over the enforced disappearances and killings under the Awami League rule are underway at the International Crimes Tribunal. The tribunal was formed for trials of crimes against humanity committed during the liberation war in 1971.

More complaints against the former influentials

Farhan , a student of Dhaka Residential Model College, was shot dead in the capital’s Dhanmondi area during a demonstration on 18 July. A complaint was filed over the incident for the first time in early September. Faiyaz’s father Shahidul Islam filed the complaint.

Among the others from the Sheikh family who have been accused of committing crimes against humanity are Sheikh Rehana, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Sayma Wazed Putul, Tulip Siddique and Radwan Mujib Siddique.

Among the former ministers and state ministers who have been accused in these cases are Obaidul Quader, AKM Mozammel Haque, Asaduzzaman Khan, Anisul Huq, Hasan Mahmud, Jahangir Kabir Nanak, Hasanul Haque Inu, Rashed Khan Menon, Amir Hossain Amu, Abdur Razzaque, Faruk Khan, Shajahan Khan, Matia Chowdhury (late), Dipu Moni, Kamrul Islam, Mohibul Hasan Chowdhury, Junaid Ahmed, Mohammad Ali Arafat and Kamal Ahmed Majumder and advisers to the former prime ministers Salman F Rahman and Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury.

International Crimes Tribunal prosecutor BM Sultan Mahmud told Prothom Alo, “All the complaints are under investigation now. No one will be sued if the complaints are not proven during the primary investigation.”

*This report appeared on the print and online versions of Prothom Alo and has been rewritten in English by Ashish Basu​
 

Tribunal issues arrest warrant against ex-MP, 4 cops for burning bodies of protesters
Staff Correspondent
Dhaka
Updated: 24 Dec 2024, 15: 52

1735092823980.png

Four police officials were directly linked with the killing and burning bodies of the victims on 5 August Collected

The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) has issued an arrest warrant against Saiful Islam, former lawmaker for Dhaka-19, and four police officials in a case filed over burning bodies of demonstrators in Dhaka’s Ashulia during July-August movement.

The arrest warrant was issued by the chairman of the ICT, justice Md Golam Mortuza Majumder, and the member of the tribunal, retired district and sessions judge Md Mohitul Haque Enam Chowdhury, on Tuesday morning.

A separate case (miscellaneous case) was registered at the ICT today, Tuesday regarding the burning of bodies in Ashulia. With this, a total of eight cases have been registered at the tribunal so far.

Speaking with newsmen over the case, the ICT’s chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam said, “A submission was made in the tribunal today. Six students were shot dead in the Ashulia area of Savar on 5 August. Their bodies were dragged into a rickshaw. After leaving them there for a while, a police van was brought there and the bodies were taken. The police van was taken in front of a shop near the police station and an attempt was made to set it on fire with petrol so that people don’t understand who killed them. If the police killed them and set the police car on fire, people might think that the students and the public had done the killing. Thus, they set the police van on fire to cover up the killing.”

Tajul Islam said the tribunal's investigation agency had carried out a detailed probe of the incident.

“The investigation revealed that apart from police, Dhaka-19 parliamentary constituency’s the then lawmaker Saiful Islam and Chhatra League men directly shot at the protesters that day. He and four police officials have been identified for their involvement with the incident,” Tajul added.

The tribunal has granted an arrest warrant against these five and asked the authorities to arrest them quickly.

The court has set 26 January as the next hearing day for the case, he added.

The ICT’s chief prosecutor said four police officials were directly linked with the killing and burning bodies of the victims.

“We won’t disclose their names so that they cannot flee. High-ups of the law enforcers have been notified so that those involved cannot escape,” said Tajul, adding that the four cops are not yet sacked from the force.

Tajul also said that an application is being made to issue arrest warrants against those specifically involved in the July-August massacre only after collecting information and evidence.

Prosecutors Gazi Monwar Hussain, BM Sultan Mahmud, Abdullah Al Noman and others were present at the hearing.​
 

July atrocities: Trial of top brass to be completed within a year
Say law adviser, ICT

1735429309763.png


The top leaders of the ousted Awami League regime who stand accused of commanding the crimes against humanity during the July uprising will be brought to book within a year, speakers said at a dialogue yesterday.

Law Adviser Asif Nazrul said, "Next year, we aim to celebrate the Victory Day by meting out justice to mass murderers."

He added that while amending the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) law, the government intentionally refrained from including any provisions to try the AL as a political party.

"We want this trial process to be internationally accepted. We don't want to give anybody the scope to say this court is politically motivated," the adviser told the National Dialogue-2024, organised by the Forum for Bangladesh Studies at the Krishibid Institute Bangladesh.

Speaking at the same session, ICT Chief Prosecutor Tajul Islam said, "The tribunal cannot bring to justice every single officer or individual involved in crimes against humanity [within the time frame of the interim government]. But we'll bring the 'top commanders' to justice."

He added that this will include Sheikh Hasina and those who acted as deputies in the chain of command. "Let the criminal courts deal with the rest."

The chief prosecutor further said the tribunal, with 17 investigation officers and 10 prosecutors, are being realistic with their ambitions.

Attorney General Asaduzzaman said, "One of our challenges is making sure this tribunal can never be called a 'kangaroo court' and verdicts be questioned.

"We're faced with the reality that many criminal cases are being filed under questionable circumstances and people are being victimised. But we want to assure you that those cases will not impact the processes of the ICT, which will not focus on one or two incidents, but rather attempt to prove that crimes against humanity were committed in the whole."

General Secretary of Biplobi Workers Party Kazi Saiful Haque cautioned against indulging in vengeful tactics and urged upholding the spirit of justice.

He said it has to be decided who had the command responsibility, and who were field officers carrying out the orders. "The kind of justice meted out to each of these two categories will be different."

Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami Publicity Affairs Secretary Motiur Rahman Akand expressed frustrations at the speed of the judicial process. "It has been 141 days already and we're yet to see any trial successfully completed. We feel the government is not being swift enough."

Speakers also demanded the trial of officers of the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) for their role in perpetrating enforced disappearances.

"The DGFI is not acknowledging that it was linked to enforced disappearances. There needs to be accountability," said Sanjida Islam Tulee, coordinator of Mayer Daak, the platform for victims of enforced disappearance.

Didarul Islam Bhuiyan, a member of the Digital Security Act Victims Network, said, "In this new Bangladesh, we don't want the presence of forces like DGFI or Rapid Action Battalion, that were used as tools of oppression by the past government."

In 2020, Didarul was picked up by men claiming to be Rab officials. He was bound, tortured and then prosecuted under a Digital Security Act case.

Neamul Bashir, presidium member of Liberal Democratic Party, said DGFI needs to be brought to court for its involvement in enforced disappearances.

"Law enforcement units like the police's Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime Unit, Rab and DGFI were used for political ends."

Law Adviser Asif Nazrul said the government's lawyers have already been instructed to investigate all cases filed with political motives.

"We've asked all the public prosecutors of all districts to investigate and find an estimate of the number of phantom cases filed out of political motivation."

He added that his ministry had gotten an estimate from 51 districts and was waiting for data from the remaining 13.

Zahir Uddin Swapan, media cell convener of the BNP; Jahidul Islam, secretary general of Islami Chhatra Shibir; Ashraf Ali Akand, political adviser to Islami Andolon; Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal leader Amanullah Aman; Barrister Tasnuva Shelley, among others, also spoke, while journalist Monir Haider moderated the dialogue.​
 

Enforced disappearance, extrajudicial killings, July massacre: Govt aims to finish trial of main accused in a year
Staff Correspondent 29 December, 2024, 00:43

1735431266017.png


International Crimes Tribunal chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam and law adviser Asif Nazrul, among others, on Saturday said that the trials of the prime accused in the cases of enforced disappearance, extrajudicial killings and July-August uprising mass killings would be held within next one year.

The interim government had three priority issues—trial, reforms and election, they said, noting that trial of the killers topped that list.

Their statement came on the second day of a two-day dialogue titled ‘From enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings to July mass killing: challenges of trial’ organised by the Forum for Bangladesh Studies at the Krishibid Institution at Farmgate in Dhaka city.

‘We expect that we will complete the trial of the prime accused in the International Crimes Tribunal in next one year,’ said the tribunal’s chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam while addressing the dialogue.

He said that their prime focus was to ensure the trial of the incidents of enforced disappearance and crimes against humanity and bring to justice the masterminds who ordered these crimes holding the state’s top posts.

He also said that they wanted the trials to follow the international standard so that they set an example.

Law adviser Asif Nazrul said that they would celebrate the next Victory Day with the verdict of July mass killings trials in the court.

He pointed out four major atrocities allegedly committed during the Awami League regime—Hefazat killings, BDR carnage, enforced disappearance and extrajudicial killings.

‘We are committed to ensure trials of these crimes,’ he said.

He also said that people’s expectation management was the main challenge for the interim government towards fulfilling its commitment.

Stressing importance on unity, Asif Nazrul warned that unity must not be broken despite differences in opinions.

‘Reforms cannot be held without unity,’ said Attorney General Md Asaduzzaman, adding that the main challenge was to keep the unity alive.

‘People from all walks of life took part in the July uprising against the Awami League regime,’ he said.

Supreme Court lawyer Tasnuva Shelley said that the trial of July mass killings would be based on digital evidence.

‘We require digital forensic laboratory and digital experts to crosscheck evidence. Many people are creating digital evidence through artificial intelligence, which is a concern for us,’ Tasnuva added.

Sanjida Islam Tulee, coordinator of Mayeer Daak, a platform for families of the victims of enforced disappearance, said that although the police and Rapid Action Battalion had admitted their crimes, Bangladesh Army and the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence had yet to admit their involvement.

Bangladesh Nationalist Party chairperson’s advisory council member Zahir Uddin Swapan questioned how the interim government would use the state machinery that opened fire against students taking side of the fascist regime.

BNP student organisation Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal organising secretary Kazi Saiful alleged that the Dhaka Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism and Transitional Crimes unit in reality turned into a unit of Chhatra League, the student organisation of Awami League.

‘We haven’t yet seen anyone from the CTTC has been brought to book,’ he said.

Bangladesh Revolutionary Workers’ Party general secretary Saiful Haque, Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami publicity secretary Matiur Rahmman Akanda, Bangladesh Islami Chhatrashibir secretary general Jahidul Islam and Student Movement Against Discrimination executive committee member Zahid Ahsan, among others, spoke at the dialogue.​
 

ICT crimes trial should neither be hurried nor delayed
30 December, 2024, 00:00

THE chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal, reconstituted on October 14 to expedite trial related to crimes against humanity and genocide committed during the July–August uprising, and the adviser for law to the interim government, installed on August 8 after the August 5 overthrow of the 15 years of authoritarian regime of the Awami League, say that the trial of the prime accused in cases of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killing and the killing that took place during the uprising would be completed in a year. The chief prosecutor of the tribunal on the second day of a two-day dialouge on the challenges of the trial of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killing and the mass killing of July, held at Krishibid Institution in Dhaka on December 28, has said that the prime goal is to ensure the trial of enforced disappearances and crimes against humanity and to hold to justice the masterminds of such crimes. The interim government is reported to have three issues on its priority agenda — trial, reforms and elections, but the trial of the killers is reported to be topping the list. The law adviser has said that the next Victory Day would be celebrated with the court verdict of the trial of the killings of July–August.

The crimes of involuntary disappearances, extrajudicial murder and the killing of people during the July–August uprising must, of course, be tried for justice, accountability and reparations to set a precedent that would act as a major deterrent to such crimes in future. The chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal also says that they want the trial to adhere to international standards to set a precedent. So far, so good. But what remains concerning in all this is the setting of a deadline of a sort for the completion of the trial — a year or before the next Victory Day. The trial should take its own course and the time that it would need. Any deadline for the completion of the trial, especially in the cases that the International Crimes Tribunal would deal with, could entail hurried and, even, delayed justice. There should be no hurry and no delay in the trial of the crimes at hand. Any hurry or delay could also taint the trial and make it controversial. Whilst the investigation should be thorough and credible, it is extremely important that the trial should also remain above any bias and strictly uphold the rule of law to avoid any controversy. Such concern is more pressing as a Supreme Court lawyer has already said that the trial would be based on digital evidence, but many are reported to be creating digital evidence with the help of artificial intelligence.

The trial of the crimes that the International Crimes Tribunal deals with should neither be hurried nor delayed to stop them from falling into controversy. It should take its own course.​
 

Michael Chakma lodges complaint with ICT against Hasina, 8 others
BSS
Dhaka
Published: 30 Dec 2024, 22: 59

1735607385770.png


Michael Chakma, a leader of the United Peoples Democratic Front (UPDF), on Monday filed an allegation of enforced disappearance with International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) against ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina and eight others.

The UPDF leader also handed over a towel (gamchha) to have used for blindfolding during his kidnapping to the ICT.

ICT Prosecutor Abdullah Al Noman told the journalists that the complainant presented a towel (ganchha) to the prosecution which was used for tying his eyes during the abduction as evidence.

The UPDF leader also described the glassed circled room (Ayna Ghar) where he was forced to stay for more than five years and four months to the ICT.

The UPDF called a siege programme in 2013 during a Khagrachhari tour of the then prime minister Sheikh Hasina when Sheikh Hasina threatened blockaders including me, he added.

The law enforcers questioned him several times during the period of his enforced disappearance as he along with his party men opposed to the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace accord.

He said he thought that for these reasons, he was kidnapped by the law enforcing agencies.

Michael Chakma was taken away by unidentified quarters from Kanchpur area under Narayanganj district on April 9 in 2019 while returning to Dhaka after his organizational work.

He was released from the confinement on August 7 this year after the fall of fascist Sheikh Hasina's government in the face of the July-August uprising.​
 

ICT gets four more prosecutors
BSS
Published :
Jan 01, 2025 19:21
Updated :
Jan 01, 2025 19:21

1735784559324.png


The government on Wednesday appointed four new prosecutors to the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT), bringing the total number of prosecutors to 13.

The four newly-appointed prosecutors are -- Md Abdus Sobhan Tarafder, Md Sahidul Islam Sarder, Faruk Ahammed and Md Hasanul Bannah.

The solicitor wing of the Law and Justice Division issued a gazette notification in this regard, saying the order will come into effect immediately.

Of the four, Md Abdus Sobhan Tarafder was appointed with the status of Additional Attorney General, Md Sahidul Islam Sarder and Faruk Ahammed were appointed with the status of Deputy Attorney General, and Md Hasanul Bannah will enjoy the status of Assistant Attorney General.

Earlier on October 25, the government appointed five prosecutors-SM Moinul Karim, Md Nure Ershad, Siddiqui, Shaikh Mahdi, Tarek Abdullah and Tanvir Hasan Joha.

The government on September 7 appointed four prosecutors, with Supreme Court

Advocate Muhammad Tajul Islam being made the Chief Prosecutor. The three other prosecutors were Gazi Monawar Hossain Tamim, BM Sultan Mahmud and Abdullah Al Noman.​
 

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle