0

[🇵🇰] Jinnah And Urdu-Bengali Controversy: A Historical Fallacy

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Pakistan Affairs
[🇵🇰] Jinnah And Urdu-Bengali Controversy: A Historical Fallacy
39
3K
More threads by Old School

Status
Not open for further replies.

Old School

Senior Moderator
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
1,026
Nation

Residence

Axis Group

Jinnah And Urdu-Bengali Controversy
By Yasser Latif Hamdani

This is a quick blog to correct a historical fallacy. A false impression persists – thanks to people like Amar Jaleel and the like who in the right royal Urdu press fashion have a hard time sticking to the facts- that Jinnah- who according to Jaleel was drugged or cornered into making the speech in question- somehow told Bengalis to outlaw Bengali language when he declared Urdu to be the state language of Pakistan. This is historically inaccurate. This blog is not to discuss whether Jinnah’s declaration was politically suave or naïve but to set the record straight about what it was that Jinnah said which laid foundations for the Urdu-Bengali discord in Pakistan and led to Pakistan ultimately declaring both Urdu and Bengali the “national languages” of Pakistan. Ironically Jinnah did not even use the term “national language”, drawing the very valid distinction between a state language or lingua franca and a national language.

The two speeches that are at the center of controversy were made on 21st and 24th of March, 1948 at a public meeting and then at Dacca University convention. In both speeches Jinnah took a consistent stand:

  1. The people of Bengal were free to choose Bengali as the official language of the Bengal province. This he said very clearly and unambiguously on both occasions and the premier of Bengal – Khawaja Nazimuddin also reaffirmed this.
  2. Urdu alone would be the state language and the lingua franca of the Pakistan state.
  3. Bengali – like other provincial languages- could be the official language of the East Bengal province but not the Pakistan state and the Pakistan center (Jinnah’s words).
(See Pages 150 and 158 of “Jinnah Speeches And Statements 1947-1948” Millennium edition Oxford University Press- he said “Realizing, however, that the statement that your Prime Minister made on the language controversy, left no room for agitation, in so far as it conceded the right of the people of this province to choose Bengali as their official language if they so wished, they changed their tactics. They started demanding that Bengali should be the state language of the Pakistan centre, and since they could not overlook the obvious claims of Urdu as the official language of a Muslim state, they proceeded to demand that both Bengali and Urdu should be the state languages of Pakistan. Make no mistake about it. There can only be one state language if the component parts of this state are to march forward in unison, and in my opinion, that can only be Urdu”)

It may be remembered that in this – wrong or right- Jinnah’s policy was identical to India’s policy of constitutionally elevating Hindi and English. Jinnah did not go even that far and described in the proper constitutional manner Urdu as the state language not a national one. Urdu was to be – in the real sense of the word- a lingua franca for the diverse people of Pakistan.

The problem with Amar Jaleel – who recently appeared on Vussatullah’s show on Dawn News Urdu Service- is that in his zeal for an otherwise good cause, he liberally twists the facts. For example in the show in question he declared amongst other things – as obiter dicta – that Gandhi had fasted in his last days to have wheat exported to Pakistan. Frankly I don’t know where he got this from. In reality however Pakistan connection in Gandhi’s fast was purported to be vis a vis Indian government’s refusal to give Pakistan its share of the treasury. However what was hilarious was his claim that Jinnah was cornered by people to make this statement.

Amar Jaleel’s cause is righteous. All Pakistani languages must be equally respected and given an equal status in the republic as languages of the people of Pakistan. However should he murder history and discredit himself by repeating this lie or does he believe that the longer it goes unnoticed, it might one day be taken up as the truth?

I have always felt that the writers of the Urdu press are given to exaggeration and embellishment, even if they are not right-wingers and pro-Jamaat-e-Islami fanatics but even self styled champions of leftists, liberals and ethno-nationalists. In this respect at least one hopes that Dawn News Urdu Service will bring some balance to the force.
 
Ironically, Jinnah did not even use the term “national language,” drawing the very valid distinction between a state language or lingua franca and a national language. It is a historical fallacy that Bengalis are tagging the issue of Urdu vs Bengali as a mother tongue, which is very absurd. Other critics even go further to imply that the so-called language movement and the event of 21 February 1952 was nothing but a part of a longstanding pro-Moscow/Delhi leftists' plot to dismember Pakistan. The subsequent claims by Bengali officials that it was a step towards independence also sustain this criticism.
 
Bangladesh got independence because we mistreated them.

Not because of Urdu/Bangla controversy lol.
It is the Bengalis and our liberals who claim that the Urdu/Bengali controversy was also part of that 'mistreatment.' They overlook that Bengali was awarded as the co-state language with Urdu in 1956.
 
It is the Bengalis and our liberals who claim that the Urdu/Bengali controversy was also part of that 'mistreatment.' They overlook that Bengali was awarded as the co-state language with Urdu in 1956.
I believe the cyclone in 1971 also contributed to the Bangladeshi unrest in the 1971 crisis.

Otherwise language was not the reason for independence lol.
 
A national myth has been constructed in Bengal over this controversy. No one ever read in Bengal what exactly Jinnah had said. I suggest that one must read this article first.
Sure Bangla could have been used in East Pakistan.

But seriously to declare independence just because of language. lol.
 
.
Sure Bangla could have been used in East Pakistan.

But seriously to declare independence just because of language. lol.
Indepence was declared by Ziaur Rahman ( on behalf of sheikh Mujibur Rahman) after military crackdown in the middle of the night!

I don't think it's related to Language! If India can have Hindi as lingua franca , Pakistan also could have Urdu as lingua franca!

Also Urdu was first Language of Muhajirs who were not more than 8 % that time!
 
Last edited:
.

Indepence was declared by Ziaur Rahman ( on behalf of sheikh Mujibur Rahman) after military crackdown in the middle of the night!

I don't think it's related to Language! If India can have Hindi as lingua franca , Pakistan also could have Urdu as lingua franca!

Also Urdu was first Language of Muhajirs who were not more than 8 % that time!
Please read how Bengalis see the language movement. it doesn’t matter how you see it. It matters how mainstream Bengalis see it now :
Contribution of Language Movement to Independence of Bangladesh (daily-sun.com)
Language Movement precursor to the Liberation War - The Business Post (businesspostbd.com)
Language Movement (1952).pdf (daffodilvarsity.edu.bd)
The Language Movement and independence - Bangladesh Post
The language movement that led to freedom (getbengal.com)
The Great Language Movement Of Bangladesh: Some Reflections| Countercurrents
Language and freedom (newagebd.net)

"And the movement increasingly assumed a liberationist, emancipatory character, at least cutting the first turf for our national liberation movement of 1971—fundamentally a people's war against Pakistani neocolonialism—driven as it was by its three distinctly pronounced principles: equality, justice, and human dignity. But the very anticolonial ethos of our Language Movement was also evident right from the beginning, as the movement confronted and combatted what I wish to call linguistic colonialism." Our Language Movement: Moments, Momentum, Milieu | The Daily Star

And there are millions of pieces of evidence if you look.
 
Last edited:
Above, I posted some evidence of their narratives that the language movement increasingly assumed a liberationist, emancipatory character, at least cutting the first turf for the national liberation movement of 1971. There are millions of pieces of evidence if you look. Now, please listen to this summary by Canada-based Bengali intellectual Dr. Taj Hashmi's narrative on this myth :
 
.

Indepence was declared by Ziaur Rahman ( on behalf of sheikh Mujibur Rahman) after military crackdown in the middle of the night!

I don't think it's related to Language! If India can have Hindi as lingua franca , Pakistan also could have Urdu as lingua franca!

Also Urdu was first Language of Muhajirs who were not more than 8 % that time!

True but Muhajirs adopted it from the Ghaznavids, whom in turn developed it in the Punjab.
 
It is the Bengalis and our liberals who claim that the Urdu/Bengali controversy was also part of that 'mistreatment.' They overlook that Bengali was awarded as the co-state language with Urdu in 1956.

I wrote about such neo-liberals on the previous forum. Plenty of them are on PDF trolling away spreading urban myths.
 
I wrote about such neo-liberals on the previous forum. Plenty of them are on PDF trolling away spreading urban myths.
Sir G.......ager hamaray mulk ko kissy nay torra......then the wrath of our nation be upon them. Utthay India baettha si.....ready to revert our ghareeb awaam en masse.
 
Last edited:
I’ve talked to bungali people and they hold a strong grudge against us and I try to calm them down and say that look it was not our people who did this but our stupid jharrnails under a CIA spell who did all the bad things. All our people were appalled at what our jharrnail did in east Pakistan and we are ashamed of it today. They know the truth but now it’s too late to make apologies.
 
I’ve talked to bungali people and they hold a strong grudge against us and I try to calm them down and say that look it was not our people who did this but our stupid jharrnails under a CIA spell who did all the bad things. All our people were appalled at what our jharrnail did in east Pakistan and we are ashamed of it today. They know the truth but now it’s too late to make apologies.

Don't ever apologize on my behalf. We did nothing to them. If building their infrastructure and giving their students access to our institutions counts as "oppression" they should have refused this.

Instead not only did they make use of what we did for them, but they thanked us by attacking our people. Raping women, killing elderly, raping even our soldiers and shooting at them unprovoked.

Then when Operation Searchlight was launched to root out these muhkti Bahini terrorists, they cry victim-hood. Luckily the truth is coming out now.

If you wish to ask them for an apology for us, i'm great with that.
 
Last edited:
It is the Bengalis and our liberals who claim that the Urdu/Bengali controversy was also part of that 'mistreatment.' They overlook that Bengali was awarded as the co-state language with Urdu in 1956.

These are also the same neo-liberals propagating Bangladesh being a "better country" than Pakistan without providing a single shred of evidence.

Here in Karachi where i'm currently at, I was followed by a poor Bengali man selling me stuff. Bengalis live illegally in Pakistan while no Pakistani or any foreigner would dream living in that 💩: Why Is Bangladesh So Dirty? (11 Reasons Why)



Bang4.jpg


dhaka-bangladesh.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members Online

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle
⬆️ Top
Read Watch Wars Shorts