[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment

[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment
571
18K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Buriganga is no longer a lifeline but a source of suffering

Shahiduzzaman

1779934019285.webp

Buriganga River UNB file photo

The Buriganga River was once the lifeline of Dhaka, supporting trade, transportation, livelihoods, and culture for centuries. It played a central role in the growth of the city and sustained thousands of families living along its banks. Today, however, the river presents a painful picture of environmental destruction.

What was once a vibrant and life-giving river has become heavily polluted, reflecting the consequences of unplanned urbanization, industrial expansion, poor waste management, and weak environmental governance. The Buriganga is no longer a source of life; it has turned into a source of disease, suffering, and economic loss.

Over the years, successive governments have repeatedly promised to free the Buriganga from pollution and restore it as a healthy river for the people of Dhaka. Various studies, master plans, and cleanup initiatives have been undertaken with support from national and international organizations. Despite these efforts, meaningful progress has remained limited. Weak implementation, lack of coordination among government agencies, corruption, and poor monitoring systems have prevented lasting solutions. As a result, millions of people continue to suffer.

The main causes of pollution are rapid industrialisation and uncontrolled urban growth along the riverbanks. Tanneries, textile dyeing factories, chemical industries, and other industrial units have long discharged untreated waste directly into the river. According to environmental experts, toxic substances such as chromium, lead, and other heavy metals enter the Buriganga every day. Untreated sewage, plastic waste and household garbage from millions of city residents flow into the river, turning it into a dark and toxic waterway.

The environmental consequences are severe. Aquatic biodiversity has declined drastically, and many fish species have disappeared from large parts of the river. In some areas, oxygen levels are so low that aquatic life cannot survive. The Buriganga has effectively become an ecological dead zone. The destruction of the river ecosystem is not only damaging biodiversity but also threatening the environmental balance of Dhaka and surrounding regions.

The human cost is equally alarming. Communities living along the riverbanks are exposed daily to polluted water and toxic air. Many poor families still depend on the river for washing, bathing, and household activities. As a result, the Buriganga has become a breeding ground for diseases. Waterborne illnesses such as diarrhea, cholera, and dysentery are widespread, along with skin diseases and respiratory problems caused by pollution and foul odours.

Children are among the worst victims. Continuous exposure to polluted water threatens their physical growth, weakens their immune systems, and increases their vulnerability to disease. Many children living near the river suffer from recurring infections, malnutrition, and poor health conditions that affect their education and future development. Women also carry a heavy burden because they are mainly responsible for household water management and caregiving. Their regular contact with polluted water during cooking, cleaning, and caregiving increases health risks and limits their ability to contribute economically to their families.

Through strict environmental laws, investment in advanced wastewater treatment systems, and long-term monitoring, the Thames has been transformed into a cleaner river where aquatic life has returned.

The economic impacts of the Buriganga’s degradation are deep and far-reaching. Thousands of fishermen have lost their traditional livelihoods due to the sharp decline in fish populations. River-based transportation, once an important part of Dhaka’s economy, has also suffered greatly. Boat operators, traders, and small businesses dependent on the river have experienced reduced income and growing uncertainty.

1779934059843.webp

Toxic industrial waste pollutes the River Buriganga File Photo

Environmental experts estimate that polluted rivers like the Buriganga cause enormous economic losses every year through increased healthcare costs, lower labor productivity, and the destruction of natural ecosystem services. Property values along the riverbanks have declined significantly, while the potential for tourism, recreation, and urban development has almost disappeared. A river that once contributed to economic growth has become a major environmental and financial burden.

Despite several interventions, including the relocation of tanneries and the establishment of treatment facilities, progress has been slow. Many industries still release untreated waste into the river, while waste management systems remain inadequate. Poor maintenance of infrastructure and weak enforcement of environmental laws continue to undermine restoration efforts.

Global experiences show that polluted rivers can be revived with strong political commitment, proper planning, and public participation. The River Thames in the United Kingdom was once declared biologically dead because of industrial pollution and untreated sewage. Through strict environmental laws, investment in advanced wastewater treatment systems, and long-term monitoring, the Thames has been transformed into a cleaner river where aquatic life has returned.

Similarly, the Cheonggyecheon Stream in South Korea was once buried beneath concrete and heavily polluted by urban waste. The government launched a large-scale restoration project that removed the elevated highway above the stream, restored water flow, and created green public spaces around it. Today, the restored stream has improved urban life, reduced pollution, and boosted tourism and local businesses.

Germany’s restoration of the Rhine River is another successful example. Once badly polluted by industrial waste, the Rhine has been revived through regional cooperation, strong environmental regulations, and modern wastewater treatment systems. Today, the river once again supports biodiversity, transportation, and economic activities.

These international examples raise an important question: Can the Buriganga also be revived? Environmental experts believe the answer is yes, but only through long-term commitment, strict law enforcement, and collective action.

Several important measures could help bring life back to the Buriganga. First, industries must be forced to install and properly operate effluent treatment plants so that untreated toxic waste no longer enters the river. Environmental laws must be strictly enforced without political interference. Second, Dhaka urgently needs modern sewage and waste management systems to prevent household waste and plastic pollution from flowing into the river.

Third, river encroachment must stop. Illegal structures built along the riverbanks should be removed, and green buffer zones should be established to protect the river environment. Fourth, continuous dredging and cleanup programs are necessary to improve water flow and remove accumulated waste and toxic sediments.

Public awareness and civic engagement are also essential. Citizens, civil society organizations, journalists, students, researchers, and environmental activists all have important roles to play. Public pressure can encourage industries and authorities to take environmental responsibilities seriously. Schools, universities, and media organizations can help educate people about the importance of protecting rivers and reducing pollution.

Strong political will is perhaps the most important requirement. River restoration cannot succeed through short-term projects or promises alone. It requires long-term national commitment, transparency, accountability, and cooperation among government agencies, industries, and communities.

The condition of the Buriganga is not only an environmental issue but also a matter of public health, human dignity, and social justice. Access to clean water and a healthy environment is a basic human right. When a river becomes a source of disease and suffering, it reflects a failure to protect these rights.

The story of the Buriganga is both a warning and a call to action. Decades of neglect and pollution have pushed the river toward ecological collapse, and millions of people are paying the price. Yet international examples prove that recovery is possible. Saving the Buriganga means restoring a river and also restoring the health, dignity and economic future of Dhaka. With effective action, strong governance, and public participation, the Buriganga can once again become a source of life rather than a symbol of environmental loss.

* The author is a freelance writer.​
 

Unilever initiative converts polluting plastic wastes to baselines of circular economy
Reported benefits include increased income opportunities, better savings and financial planning practices among participants
FE REPORT

Published :
Jun 05, 2026 01:37
Updated :
Jun 05, 2026 01:48

1780626126048.webp


Plastic waste has emerged as one of Bangladesh's most pressing environmental challenges, particularly in rapidly urbanising cities such as Chattogram and Dhaka. The growing use of single-use plastics, inadequate source segregation and limited recycling infrastructure have increased pressure on urban waste-management systems, contributing to drainage blockages, waterlogging, environmental pollution and public health risks, especially skin diseases on foots.

Unilever Bangladesh Limited (UBL), the country’s leading Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Company, in partnership with Chittagong City Corporation (CCC) and Young Power in Social Action (YPSA) launched a citywide plastic-waste-management initiative in 2022. The programme is currently being implemented across all 41 wards in the port city.

Nearly one-fourth of the port city's waste remains uncollected, creating significant environmental and civic challenges, according to CCC estimate.

The initiative aims to strengthen plastic -waste-collection and recycling systems, promote source segregation, improve the livelihoods of waste workers and support Bangladesh's transition towards a “circular economy”.

1780626192810.webp


The initiative has established an extensive plastic -collection and-recovery network covering households, markets and informal waste-collection channels throughout the city.

Key achievements: (1) More than 32,000 tonnes of plastic waste were collected between June 2022 and April 2026. (2) Around 70 per cent of the collected materials consisted of single-use plastics, while the remaining 30 per cent comprised hard plastics (3) Plastic waste is supplied every month to approximately 180 recycling enterprises and recyclers (4) The programme has set a target of collecting 8,000 tonnes of plastic waste during 2026 (5) Financial incentives are being provided for the collection of single-use plastic (6) Storage materials provided to support the collection and preservation of single -use plastics.

The initiative seeks to ensure that a larger share of plastic waste is processed and returned to productive use instead of ending up in landfills, water bodies or urban drainage systems as multi-pronged hazards.

Livelihood development and worker Inclusion are among the boons derived from the bane of plastic piles.

The programme places special emphasis on improving the working conditions and income opportunities of informal waste workers, who play a critical role in the country's recycling value chain.

Capacity building, livelihood improvement and social protection: More than 3,000 waste workers have received training on waste -management practices and occupational health and safety.

1780626233912.webp


Around 220 scrap buyers have been trained on business development, financial management and improved waste -management practices.

More than 2,000 waste collectors have received personal protective equipment (PPE) and safety gear to reduce occupational hazards.

Programme assessments indicate that around 70 per cent of participating workers reported improvements in their livelihoods.

Reported benefits include increased income opportunities, reduced occupational health risks, improved nutritional conditions and better savings and financial planning practices.

Recognising the limited access of waste workers to formal social-protection mechanisms, the initiative introduced group health and insurance coverage in 2025.

A total of 1,827 waste collectors and scrap buyers have been brought under insurance protection.

Benefits: The insurance scheme provides financial support in the event of: Injury: Tk10,000; Disability or loss of limb: Tk150,000, and Death: Tk150,000.

The initiative aims to strengthen the financial resilience of waste workers and their families while recognising the occupational risks associated with waste -collection activities.

Formalisation of the scrap buyer ecosystem: The initiative is also working to strengthen and formalise Chattogram's scrap-buyer network, which serves as a critical link between waste collectors and recycling industries.

Progress achieved shows around 50 per cent of participating scrap buyers now possess valid trade licences.

All participating scrap buyers maintain active bank accounts.

In improved business practices, most participating businesses now maintain registration books, bill vouchers, money receipts, master rolls, and formal business accounts and documentation systems.

1780626283972.webp


These measures are expected to enhance transparency, financial inclusion and long-term sustainability within the recycling value chain.

Community awareness and source segregation: Large-scale awareness campaigns have been undertaken to encourage households and institutions to separate waste at source.

Household outreach: Awareness activities have reached more than 25,000 households.

Around 40 percent of participating households currently practise waste segregation.

Outreach activities are planned for an additional 10,000 households during the current year.

Youth and educational engagement: Recognising the importance of behavioural change among younger generations, the initiative has invested significantly in youth engagement and environmental education.

School-based activities: Environmental-awareness programmes have reached more than 10,000 students. Activities have been conducted in around 80 educational institutions.

The programme is scheduled to expand to 41 additional educational institutions during the current year.

The initiative also provides recognition and incentive mechanisms for youth volunteers to encourage long-term participation in environmental activities.

And last, but not the least, is environmental significance of such an undertaking. According to CCC, uncollected waste remains a major contributor to drainage blockages, monsoon waterlogging, environmental pollution and deteriorating urban cleanliness across Chattogram.

By strengthening plastic-recovery systems, promoting source segregation, improving recycling value chains and enhancing collaboration among waste workers, scrap buyers, recyclers and local communities, the initiative seeks to address these challenges and contribute to a cleaner, healthier and more sustainable port city.​
 

Forests long in the grip of grabbers

Staff Correspondent

1780629671614.webp


On the edge of a sal forest in Gazipur’s Barmi union, a newly built poultry farm stood out as an unwelcome intrusion. Fenced by plastic nets, the tin-shed structure was empty of birds or livestock.

In one corner of the farm in Nehalia village stood two sal trees on reddish soil, indicating that the plot of land had been part of the Gazipur sal forest.

Forest department officials said several acres of forest in the village are still illegally occupied by locals while some plots were recently recovered.

One such plot was occupied by Ali Hossain, a 45-year-old farmer. The department recently took over the plot and planted saplings there.

Ali told this correspondent that the plot had been in his family’s possession for nearly three decades.

When asked if he had any documents, he said he had none.

Tanveer Ahmed, beat officer in Sreepur upazila, said they recently recovered 10 acres out of at least 18 acres of forest illegally occupied by locals in Barmi mouza under the upazila. Around 10,000 saplings of 20 species of plants have already been planted on the recovered land.

Forest department data show that out of about 20,000 acres of forest in the upazila, 4,000 acres remain under illegal occupation.

Grabbing of forest land has been going on in Gazipur for decades. Out of 65,000 acres of forest in the district, 11,900 acres are still illegally occupied by individuals and entities.

Between August 2024 and February 2025, a total of 90 acres of forest were grabbed, and the forest department recovered 35 acres during the tenure of the interim government.

Gazipur has also become a deforestation hotspot, with 60 percent of forests cleared over the past two decades.

This was revealed in a recent study titled “Environmental Condition of Gazipur District: Consequences and Trajectory”.

In 2000, tree coverage in Gazipur was 98,701 acres, which declined to 39,966 acres by 2023, said the study conducted by the River and Delta Research Center, in collaboration with Bangladesh River Foundation, Prakriti O Jibon Foundation, and Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers’ Association.

Not only the forests in Gazipur, but also those across the country are under serious threat.

According to the forest department, Bangladesh has more than 63 lakh acres of forest, covering 15.58 percent of the country’s land area. Of this, 2.37 lakh acres are still illegally occupied by individuals and public and private entities despite the recovery of 38,142 acres from grabbers till April 2026.

Amir Hossain Chowdhury, chief conservator of forest (CCF), said the forest department intensified efforts to recover encroached forest lands over the last few years, but the main responsibility lies with deputy commissioners.

“Since 2021, we have sent 17,381 documents to the district administrations concerned to recover 2.37 lakh acres of forest. But we have managed to recover 38,142 acres so far and have taken up afforestation programmes for those areas.”

He further said the process of recovering forest lands gets delayed if grabbers file cases against the department’s move. “Then we have to wait till cases are disposed of.”

Pointing out lax monitoring and weak enforcement of the law, experts said that the country has been facing deforestation due to agricultural expansion, illegal logging, human settlements, urbanisation and infrastructure development.

Environmental activist Sharif Jamil, also member secretary of environmental organisation Dhoritri Rokhhay Amra (Dhora), said the Forest Act of 1927 was formulated with the objective of regulating trade of forest resources. Later, changes were made to the law, putting focus on conservation.

However, forest lands are being encroached upon due to lax monitoring and weak enforcement of the law, he said.

“Destruction of natural forests causes irreparable damage to the environment. Afforestation is commendable, but the protection of existing forests and biodiversity is more crucial,” he added.

When contacted, Sheikh Farid, state minister for environment, forest and climate change, said the present government is determined to save forests.

“We take immediate action once we receive any allegation,” he said, adding that the government will gradually recover all the encroached forest lands.​
 

World Environment Day no marketing campaign
1780631248416.webp

The emission of huge quantities of black smoke from brick kilns adjacent to the residential areas causes irreparable damage to the environment and public health due to the negligence of the authorities concerned. The photo was taken from Mollarhat of Keraniganj. | Md Saurav

WORLD Environment Day matters. But a single day can only accomplish so much when the structures surrounding it remain fundamentally unchanged, writes Arghya Protik Chowdhury

THERE is a ritual that plays out with clockwork precision every year in Bangladesh. On the eve of World Environment Day, press releases flood journalists’ inboxes. Corporate logos are affixed to leafy backdrops. Executives in crisp shirts kneel in the mud, just long enough for the camera shutter, and plant a sapling. By evening, the posts are up on LinkedIn. By June 6, the sapling is forgotten, and business resumes as usual. This is not environmentalism. This is theatre. And we, as a society, have been a remarkably uncritical audience for far too long.

Anatomy of a green lie

GREENWASHING, the practice of projecting an environmentally responsible image while continuing ecologically harmful operations, is not a new phenomenon globally. But in Bangladesh, it has taken on a particularly brazen character. Here, a garment factory can dump untreated effluent into the Turag for eleven months and then sponsor a ‘Green Factory’ banner at a sustainability conference in December. A real estate developer can fill wetlands on the outskirts of Dhaka and then plant a rooftop garden and call the project ‘eco-friendly’. A multinational corporation can fly in a sustainability officer for the annual report photo shoot while its local supply chain violates every environmental norm in the book. The pattern is entirely consistent: the spectacle of responsibility without any of its substance. And year after year, we reward it with applause.

What makes this particularly damaging is not just the hypocrisy itself, but what it displaces. Every taka spent on a greenwashing campaign is a taka not spent on actual emissions reduction. Every hour a communications team devotes to crafting the perfect environmental narrative is an hour not spent on genuine operational reform. Greenwashing does not merely fail to help. It actively crowds out the real work by allowing companies to purchase social legitimacy cheaply, without earning it.

What the numbers actually say

ACCORDING to IQAir’s latest World Air Quality Report, Bangladesh recorded an annual average PM2.5 concentration of 66.1 micrograms per cubic metre in 2025, making it the second most polluted country in the world, behind only Pakistan. This is not a new ignominy. Bangladesh has consistently ranked among the most polluted countries since IQAir began publishing its global air quality reports, holding the top position for four consecutive years between 2018 and 2021. Bangladesh’s PM2.5 concentration remains more than 13 times higher than the World Health Organization’s recommended annual guideline of 5 micrograms per cubic metre.

The rivers tell an equally grim story. Dissolved oxygen levels in the Buriganga, Turag, and Balu have fallen too low to support aquatic life. For nearby residents, the cost is physical: Human Rights Watch reports chronic fevers, skin diseases, and respiratory illnesses among communities living along these waterways. According to the Ministry of Environment, tanneries alone discharge more than 21,000 cubic metres of toxic waste into the Buriganga daily, while Dhaka’s residents add approximately 4,500 tonnes of solid waste to the river each day.

The garment industry, which Bangladesh rightly holds up as an engine of economic transformation, presents a particularly instructive case. Bangladesh is now home to 270 LEED-certified garment factories, the largest concentration of top-tier certified apparel factories globally. The certification numbers make for excellent export branding. They do not, however, tell us what is happening in the waterways downstream of the industrial belts, nor do they account for the vast network of smaller suppliers and subcontractors that feed the same supply chains without ever appearing on an auditor’s checklist. A green certificate at the top of a supply chain does not sanitise what happens further down it. Against this backdrop, a sapling planted on June 5 is not a gesture of hope. It is an insult dressed as one.

Complicity of silence

PART of the problem lies with us — the media, civil society, and the public — who consume these narratives without demanding verification. When a major corporation announces a ‘carbon neutrality pledge’ or a ‘zero-waste initiative’, how often do our newsrooms send reporters to verify progress six months later? When a factory wins a green certification, how often do we ask who audited it, under what conditions, and whether the audit covered the full scope of operations? The machinery of greenwashing runs smoothly precisely because scrutiny is rare and institutional memory is short.

There is also a subtler form of complicity at work in how we frame environmental progress in this country. We celebrate announcements rather than outcomes. We report pledges rather than performance. A company that commits to planting one million trees by 2030 receives the same column inches as one that has actually reduced its carbon emissions by 30 per cent. The incentive structure, as a result, strongly favours the press release over the balance sheet.

Regulatory institutions bear a heavy share of responsibility as well. Bangladesh’s Department of Environment is chronically underfunded, understaffed, and susceptible to the same political and commercial pressures that allow polluters to operate with impunity. Environmental laws exist on paper in impressive detail. The Environment Conservation Act 1995, the Environment Court Act, and a range of sector-specific regulations create a framework that, if properly enforced, could hold corporations genuinely accountable. Enforcement, however, remains largely aspirational. Court cases drag on for years. Fines, when they are eventually levied, are so modest relative to corporate revenues that they function as little more than a cost of doing business.

The standard we should demand

None of this is to argue that all corporate environmental initiatives in Bangladesh are fraudulent. Some companies are making genuine, measurable investments in cleaner production, waste reduction, and renewable energy. The distinction between those companies and the greenwashers is not philosophically complicated. It lies in transparency, third-party verification, and consistent behaviour across all 365 days of the year, rather than performative bursts timed to the environmental calendar.

What we need is a fundamental shift in the baseline of what we accept as evidence of environmental responsibility. A press release is not evidence. A sponsored tree-planting event is not evidence. A glossy sustainability report produced by the same communications firm that handles brand advertising is not evidence. Evidence is independently audited emissions data, published in full and on time. Evidence is publicly accessible records of effluent treatment and waste disposal. Evidence is a company that lobbies for stronger environmental regulation rather than against it; that welcomes inspections rather than negotiating around them; and that ties executive compensation to measurable environmental outcomes rather than to reputational metrics.

Civil society and the media must begin treating unverified green claims with the same scepticism applied to any other unsubstantiated corporate assertion. Regulatory bodies must be given, and must use, the authority to name, shame, and meaningfully penalise companies whose environmental commitments exist only on their websites. Bangladesh’s growing community of institutional investors and international development partners must begin conditioning their relationships with corporations on verified environmental performance, not stated intentions.

One day is not enough

WORLD Environment Day matters. The conversations it catalyses and the public attention it directs towards urgent issues are not trivial. But a single day can only accomplish so much when the structures surrounding it remain fundamentally unchanged. Bangladesh faces genuine, existential environmental challenges. Rising sea levels are threatening its southern coast. Dhaka recorded at least two months in 2025 during which PM2.5 concentrations exceeded 100 micrograms per cubic metre, levels that cause measurable damage to human lungs and cardiovascular systems. Rivers that once supported fisheries, agriculture, and millions of livelihoods can no longer perform those functions. These are not problems that a well-photographed sapling will solve, and they are not problems that will wait politely while corporations refine their messaging.

The question for Bangladesh’s corporate sector this June 5 is a straightforward one. After the photographs are taken and the press releases are distributed, what actually changes? Which factory installs the effluent treatment plant it has been deferring for three years? Which conglomerate appoints an independent environmental auditor with genuine authority? Which industry association lobbies the government for stricter standards rather than more lenient ones? If the answer to all of these questions is nothing, then we would all be better served by skipping the sapling entirely and having an honest conversation about why that is. Accountability cannot be seasonal. Bangladesh deserves, and urgently needs, something far more honest than one green day in a calendar of 365.

Arghya Protik Chowdhury studies Environmental Science at Bangladesh University of Professionals.​
 

Latest Posts

Back