New Tweets

[🇮🇳] The latest exposure, hundreds of Indian POWs in 2020 GALWAN.

G   Indian Defense
[🇮🇳] The latest exposure, hundreds of Indian POWs in 2020 GALWAN.
26
255
More threads by Jiangnan

This is a pretty old video. Post Galwan time or thereabouts.

The most ironical thing is, and you will never get them to admit it, that the Pakistanis enjoyed it as much as we guys did.
Indian soldiers used their numerical superiority to sneak up on a Chinese patrol.What do you think we can't admit?This Chinese patrol surrendered to the Indians?

We are different from the Indians.Let me help you recall the Indian propaganda.

“India killed 108 PLA soldiers in Galwan.They are Song Jiang.Lu Junyi, Wu Yong, Wu Song, Lin Chong, and others.”

Let me give you an example.This is Song Jiang.

Screenshot_20250608_120857_com_microsoft_emmx_ChromeTabbedActivity.jpg


If we were Indians.I would say in Galwan.The Chinese army killed Shiva.😂😂😂😂😂
 
Indian soldiers used their numerical superiority to sneak up on a Chinese patrol.What do you think we can't admit?This Chinese patrol surrendered to the Indians?

We are different from the Indians.Let me help you recall the Indian propaganda.

“India killed 108 PLA soldiers in Galwan.They are Song Jiang.Lu Junyi, Wu Yong, Wu Song, Lin Chong, and others.”

Let me give you an example.This is Song Jiang.

View attachment 18414

If we were Indians.I would say in Galwan.The Chinese army killed Shiva.😂😂😂😂😂
This happens regularly. Don't be completely retarded. This number of men on both sides cannot "sneak up" on one another. They are not Ninja turtles, jangia san.
 
This happens regularly. Don't be completely retarded. This number of men on both sides cannot "sneak up" on one another. They are not Ninja turtles, jangia san.
From the video.The Chinese patrol force only has dozens of soldiers.Their patrol routes are fixed.It's obvious.They were ambushed.

We did not deny the video. Chinese soldiers did not surrender. No weapons were abandoned.
 
From the video.The Chinese patrol force only has dozens of soldiers.Their patrol routes are fixed.It's obvious.They were ambushed.

We did not deny the video. Chinese soldiers did not surrender. No weapons were abandoned.

Nonsense bro.

Thos is a dance both sides play. Nothing is hidden.

There is always pushing and shoving involved.

That is why Galwan was nasty. Your rogue formation crossed the line. And we had to kill a lot of you to get the point across.
 
Nonsense bro.

Thos is a dance both sides play. Nothing is hidden.

There is always pushing and shoving involved.

That is why Galwan was nasty. Your rogue formation crossed the line. And we had to kill a lot of you to get the point across.
bro. do you know what I admire most about Indians? Indians really believe in Indian propaganda. Different from India. We only killed one Indian lieutenant colonel and 20 Indian soldiers. then... We escorted hundreds of Indian POWs to march.

Screenshot_20241127_193819_com_UCMobile_InnerUCMobile.jpg


A colony wants to achieve the expansion goal of its suzerain state. But unfortunately. Colonies are too weak.
 
bro. do you know what I admire most about Indians? Indians really believe in Indian propaganda. Different from India. We only killed one Indian lieutenant colonel and 20 Indian soldiers. then... We escorted hundreds of Indian POWs to march.

View attachment 18419

A colony wants to achieve the expansion goal of its suzerain state. But unfortunately. Colonies are too weak.

Even you don't buy that propaganda.

We've seen the local chats of your citizens of sons who never came home.
 
Those chats were quickly disappeared.

Not before alert Indians had taken screenshots.

Google Translate did the rest.
Just some chat screenshots? I am currently an Indian soldier. We lost 1000 soldiers in GALWAN. OK? you can provide some photos. For example, these.

Screenshot_20230908_000251.jpg
Screenshot_20230908_000407.jpg


btw. The list of "India killed 108 PLA soldiers" was also provided by the Chinese.
 

Staff online

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle ? + ++