[🇧🇩] The U.S.A.---A Strategic Partner of Bangladesh

[🇧🇩] The U.S.A.---A Strategic Partner of Bangladesh
209
9K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

US cotton plan considers Bangladesh a key market

Refayet Ullah Mirdha

1780272612582.webp


Bangladesh is expected to play a significant role in a new US initiative aimed at boosting American cotton exports, as the Trump administration links potential tariff benefits for Bangladeshi apparel exports to the use of US cotton and textile inputs.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) last week launched the Great American Cotton Plan to revitalise the cotton farm economy in the US.

“USDA and USTR secured commitments from Indonesia and Bangladesh that will support future US cotton purchases and textile production using American cotton,” the plan states.

Under the plan, Bangladesh could receive tariff reductions on apparel produced using US cotton and textile inputs, alongside other tariff-related concessions.

A Bangladesh-US reciprocal trade agreement signed on February 9 commits Washington to establishing a mechanism allowing certain Bangladeshi textile and apparel goods to enter the US at a zero reciprocal tariff rate.

However, the volume eligible for this benefit will be tied to Bangladesh’s imports of US-produced cotton and man-made fibre inputs. The US has yet to clarify the textile clause of the deal.

Showkat Aziz Russell, president of Bangladesh Textile Mills Association (BTMA), said American cotton’s share of Bangladesh’s nearly $4.0 billion annual cotton import bill has been growing steadily, with local spinners, millers, and traders increasingly turning to US suppliers. He has already held talks with senior US officials on the bilateral cotton trade.

Russell flagged two key obstacles to scaling up US cotton use: the Rules of Origin (RoO) requirements and the long shipping distance between the two countries.

He noted that while American cotton offers superior quality, greater clarity is needed on the tariff benefits available to Bangladeshi exporters.

During discussions with US officials, Russell sought clarification on the RoO requirements governing the use of US cotton and man-made fibre in garments eligible for tariff concessions.

Based on discussions with US officials, he said the reduced tariff facility may apply only to a specified quota rather than all exports.

Russell also stressed the need for warehouse facilities in Bangladesh to store and market US cotton. Imports from neighbouring countries require much shorter lead times, while shipments from the US can take more than 45 days, potentially affecting exporters’ competitiveness.

Faisal Samad, a director of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), said the association will meet officials from the US Embassy in Dhaka next week to discuss the RoO requirements for garments made from US cotton and man-made fibre.

BGMEA leaders had previously sought clarification on the issue during meetings with visiting US Trade Representative (USTR) officials, but were told that work on the framework was still underway.

The US currently accounts for nearly 9 percent of Bangladesh’s annual cotton imports, which are valued at nearly $4.0 billion.

US goods trade with Bangladesh totalled an estimated $11.8 billion in 2025.

American imports from Bangladesh reached $9.5 billion -- up 13.3 percent from 2024 -- while US exports to Bangladesh were $2.3 billion.

The resulting trade deficit stood at $7.1 billion, a 17.9 percent increase from the previous year. Garments account for 86 percent of Bangladesh’s exports to the US.​
 

Does US concern over forced labour reflect reality?

Atiqul Kabir Tuhin

Published :
Jun 06, 2026 23:39
Updated :
Jun 06, 2026 23:39

1780791223934.webp


The ready-made garment (RMG) industry of Bangladesh is beset with a host of labour rights-related problems, ranging from low wages and long working hours to restrictions on forming unions, job insecurity, and so on. But the U.S. Trade Representative's Office (USTR) has recently moved to penalise Bangladesh over an issue that appears to have little to do with the RMG industry. Citing the failure to enforce laws prohibiting goods made with "forced labor," the USTR has proposed imposing a new 10 to 12.5 per cent tariff on Bangladesh, and 59 other countries.

The proposed tariff could hardly come at a worse time for Bangladesh. The country's export sector is already grappling with global economic uncertainties, weakening demand in key markets, and mounting competitive pressures. Against this backdrop, the USTR's decision threatens to further undermine the competitiveness of Bangladeshi products in the US market. Economists warn that invoking forced labour provisions without clear evidence of systematic forced labour practices could impose significant economic costs while doing little to address the broader labour rights challenges facing the RMG sector.

According to estimates by the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), Bangladeshi exports to the United States could face a cumulative tariff burden of around 44 per cent, comprising a 15 per cent general tariff, an additional 19 per cent reciprocal duty, and the newly proposed 10 per cent tariff linked to alleged forced labour concerns.

The International Labour Organization (ILO) defines forced labour as "All work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily." In other words, while poor working conditions, low wages, or long hours are serious labour rights concerns, those do not constitute forced labour. Rather, forced labour occurs when workers are deprived of the freedom to make a voluntary and informed choice about their employment because of coercion, intimidation, or other forms of undue pressure.

It is worth recalling that Bangladesh's garment industry has successfully addressed labour-related concerns raised by the United States in the past. The issue of child labour in the RMG sector came to the forefront following the introduction of the Child Labor Deterrence Act of 1993 by US Senator Tom Harkin. In response, the Bangladesh government, in collaboration with the ILO and local NGOs such as BRAC and Gono Shahajjo Sangstha, launched a comprehensive rehabilitation programme for child workers. Under the "earn and learn" scheme, children withdrawn from factories were enrolled in NGO-run schools while receiving financial support. Rather than simply removing children from workplaces, the initiative focused on their rehabilitation and education. The programme is widely regarded as a success, leading to the elimination of child labour from the export-oriented garment sector and demonstrating that labour rights challenges can be addressed through cooperation and targeted interventions rather than punitive measures alone.

Child labour, however, still exist in sectors such as brick kilns and the informal economy. Its persistence is driven largely by poverty, inadequate social protection, and household economic hardship rather than systematic forced labour as defined by international conventions. According to Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics estimates, millions of children remain engaged in informal economic activities to support themselves and their families. Addressing such realities requires a nuanced understanding of the socioeconomic conditions that drive child labour. Viewing these challenges solely through the lens of labour law enforcement risks oversimplifying a complex problem and may ultimately hinder effective solutions.

Therefore, if the US's objective is genuinely to strengthen labour standards and eliminate exploitative practices, then technical assistance, capacity-building programmes, and targeted support for vulnerable workers would likely prove more effective than punitive trade measures. Effective labour reform is best achieved through cooperation, not through measures that may ultimately punish the very workers they are intended to protect.​
 

Latest Posts

Back