[🇹🇷] Turkish Tea House - Çay Bahçesi

[ThunderCat]

Why should I go to Afghanistan? I am not an Afghanistani. I can go to Saudi Arabia for Sharia, lol.

What about Brunei which is also an Islamic country?

You do not need secularism to develop. A nation can industrialize and be economically developed like Japan.

Wasn't your Ataturk supposedly an atheist? lol. Why should I care about him?

Lailik is not the same as secularism of Europe or North America. Turkey's concept of "secularism" is different from those countries and Attaturk's politics were very much Islamic.

Brunei is developed because it is an oil rich country.

Stop importing your trolling habits from the previous forum. This is what you come for. To troll and repeat your stupidity here. Cut it out.

 

[Deleted due to Error (Muji Iqbal)]

Lailik is not the same as secularism of Europe or North America. Turkey's concept of "secularism" is different from those countries and Attaturk's politics were very much Islamic.

Brunei is developed because it is an oil rich country.

Stop importing your trolling habits from the previous forum. This is what you come for. To troll and repeat your stupidity here. Cut it out.

Post reported for using "stupidity."

@Old School

Wasn't Ataturk supposedly an atheist? How was Ataturk's secularization of Turkey supposedly "Islamic?"

 

[Deleted due to Error (Muji Iqbal)]

Lailik is not the same as secularism of Europe or North America. Turkey's concept of "secularism" is different from those countries and Attaturk's politics were very much Islamic.

Brunei is developed because it is an oil rich country.

Stop importing your trolling habits from the previous forum. This is what you come for. To troll and repeat your stupidity here. Cut it out.

How was Ataturk's policies "Islamic?" Ataturk himself was an atheist. lol.

Lord Kinross and Andrew Mango's biographies of Ataturk state Ataturk was not a Muslim or he was an atheist.

And you cut it out with your nonsense. Instead of using foul language, counter my arguments instead, if you can that is.

 

[Old School]

How was Ataturk's policies "Islamic?" Ataturk himself was an atheist. lol.

Lord Kinross and Andrew Mango's biographies of Ataturk state Ataturk was not a Muslim or he was an atheist.

And you cut it out with your nonsense. Instead of using foul language, counter my arguments instead, if you can that is.

Please refrain from religious topics until you finish reading this one General - The Axiology of Theism . Theological discourse requires a lot of philosophical knowledge in order to be able to take part in discussions. It is not simply possible with just guessing.

 

[Deleted due to Error (Muji Iqbal)]

Please refrain from religious topics until you finish reading this one General - The Axiology of Theism . Theological discourse requires a lot of philosophical knowledge to be able to take part in discussion. It is not simply possible with just guessing.

I understand that, but please tell other moderators and members not to use foul words. Thank you.

 

[Old School]

I understand that, but please tell other moderators and members not to use foul words. Thank you.

Everyone should understand that religion is a complex philosophical discourse that requires a lot of study and knowledge. It can not be guessed the way we please as some fake spiritualists do in our society.

 

[Old School]

Lailik is not the same as secularism of Europe or North America. Turkey's concept of "secularism" is different from those countries and Attaturk's politics were very much Islamic.

Brunei is developed because it is an oil rich country.

Stop importing your trolling habits from the previous forum. This is what you come for. To troll and repeat your stupidity here. Cut it out.

I have also noticed another pattern where one never reads/understands the posts and keeps replying with 'red herring'/ strawman arguments. I am unsure if those elements are trolls, but those are annoying. In a defense forum, expecting people to be above-average knowledgeable is not unreasonable. However, as with OLD PDF, most participants are best fit for casual topic forums, unfortunately.

 

[Deleted due to Error (Muji Iqbal)]

I have also noticed another pattern where one never reads/understands the posts and keeps replying with 'red herring'/ strawman arguments. I am unsure if those elements are trolls, but those are annoying. In a defense forum, expecting people to be above-average knowledgeable is not unreasonable. However, as with OLD PDF, most participants are best fit for casual topic forums, unfortunately.

Someone claimed I was trolling. How am I trolling, Sir? I am simply stating facts.