Saif
Senior Member
- Jan 24, 2024
- 12,718
- 7,061
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #37

HC issues rule questioning tourist restrictions at Saint Martin’s Island
The High Court today issued a rule questioning the legality of the government's decision to impose restrictions on the movement and stay of tourists or citizens on the environmentally critical Saint Martin’s Island
HC issues rule questioning tourist restrictions at Saint Martin’s Island
File photo
The High Court today issued a rule questioning the legality of the government's decision to impose restrictions on the movement and stay of tourists or citizens on the environmentally critical Saint Martin's Island.
In the rule, the court asked the officials concerned with the government including the forest, environment and climate change secretary and director general of the Department of the Environment (DoE) to explain in four weeks why the decision to impose the restrictions should not be declared illegal.
The HC bench of Justice Farah Mahbub and Justice Debasish Roy Chowdhury issued the rule following a writ petition filed by Cox's Bazar Citizens Forum President ANM Helal Uddin on November 21 challenging the legality of the decision.
The Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change issued a memorandum on October 28 regarding the implementation of a five-point decision to control unrestrained tourism and single-use plastic pollution on the Island.
According to the decisions, Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority will allow vessels to ply on the island with the consent of the environment ministry. Tourists will not be allowed to stay on the island in December and January. The average number of tourists there will not exceed 2,000 per day. There are added restrictions on light, noise and barbecue parties at night on the beach as well.
The petitioner's lawyer Md Uzzal Hossain told The Daily Star that the memorandum which was issued by the environment ministry is contradictory to article 36 of the constitution which guarantees freedom of movement.
However, if a ban is imposed on the movement of the people of the country, it must be subject to restrictions imposed by law. The ministry's memorandum is not a law, the lawyer said.
Advocate Amir Hossain also appeared for the writ petitioner while Deputy Attorney General Md Tanim Khan represented the state during the hearing of the petition.
File photo
The High Court today issued a rule questioning the legality of the government's decision to impose restrictions on the movement and stay of tourists or citizens on the environmentally critical Saint Martin's Island.
In the rule, the court asked the officials concerned with the government including the forest, environment and climate change secretary and director general of the Department of the Environment (DoE) to explain in four weeks why the decision to impose the restrictions should not be declared illegal.
The HC bench of Justice Farah Mahbub and Justice Debasish Roy Chowdhury issued the rule following a writ petition filed by Cox's Bazar Citizens Forum President ANM Helal Uddin on November 21 challenging the legality of the decision.
The Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change issued a memorandum on October 28 regarding the implementation of a five-point decision to control unrestrained tourism and single-use plastic pollution on the Island.
According to the decisions, Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority will allow vessels to ply on the island with the consent of the environment ministry. Tourists will not be allowed to stay on the island in December and January. The average number of tourists there will not exceed 2,000 per day. There are added restrictions on light, noise and barbecue parties at night on the beach as well.
The petitioner's lawyer Md Uzzal Hossain told The Daily Star that the memorandum which was issued by the environment ministry is contradictory to article 36 of the constitution which guarantees freedom of movement.
However, if a ban is imposed on the movement of the people of the country, it must be subject to restrictions imposed by law. The ministry's memorandum is not a law, the lawyer said.
Advocate Amir Hossain also appeared for the writ petitioner while Deputy Attorney General Md Tanim Khan represented the state during the hearing of the petition.