Home Watch Videos Wars Movies Login

[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment

[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment
528
14K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Indifference is killing our canals
Cumilla EPZ authorities must answer for pollution of canals
1721172733965.webp


Given the speed with which our rivers, canals, and other water bodies are being grabbed or polluted, it may appear as if we are in some kind of a sick competition to destroy them. Every day, we are bombarded with news of influential people and institutions harming the lifelines of the country—not just big rivers but also the canals running through cities and towns. According to a recent report by this daily, the canals in Cumilla Sadar south upazila have been facing such onslaughts for some time now.

The problem has been traced to untreated industrial waste from the Cumilla Export Processing Zone (Cumilla EPZ) being discharged into at least five canals. As a result, some 70,000 people of 50 villages have lost their livelihoods. In the past, when the water of the canals was clear, it could be used for irrigation, fishing and other household purposes. But now the water has turned black and foul and is destroying crops while the fish population has also depleted. Two of the canals have already lost their navigability and shrunk due to deposition of industrial sludge.

The question is, why are the Cumilla EPZ factories discharging untreated waste into nearby canals despite there being a Central Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) since 2014? It has been alleged that EPZ authorities often keep CETP operations suspended. What is the point of setting up a CETP if it cannot serve its purpose? Why is nothing being done despite the immense sufferings of local people?

Like these canals in Cumilla, there are countless others in the country that have been facing the same existential threat due to grabbing and indiscriminate waste disposal. The canals of Dhaka are perhaps the worst example in this regard, but those in Chattogram and other major districts are in no better shape. We have seen how the Chaktai canal in Chattogram was reduced to a narrow strip over the years. These filled-up water bodies are why many cities go under water even after a moderate rain. We, therefore, urge the authorities to revive at-risk canals by stopping illegal waste disposal.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Sad (0)
Reactions: Bilal9

Dhaka's canals cannot be saved without decisive leadership
120 kilometres of canals have been lost over the past 80 years
1721172961220.webp

VISUAL: STAR

The crisis surrounding Dhaka's rivers, ponds and open spaces has been repeatedly highlighted in recent years. A new study by the River and Delta Research Centre (RDRC) now turned the spotlight on canals, which are fast disappearing thanks to encroachment, unplanned urbanisation, and negligence from the authorities. According to the study, Dhaka has lost a staggering 120 kilometres or 307 hectares of canals—which is more than the distance between the capital and Mymensingh city—over the past 80 years. Researchers compared the 1880-1940 land survey, known as the Cadastral survey, with satellite images from 2022 before concluding that some 95 canals have been completely lost or reduced to less than half of their original length.

In other words, 55 percent of the land occupied by canals and river channels during the Cadastral survey has been lost by now. Even though successive governments have excavated 10 major canals and created four new lakes, it was nothing compared to the critical loss of water bodies that Dhaka continues to suffer to this day, as various reports have shown. If the trend holds, it may not be too far into the future that these once-treasured features of the city would cease to exist, at least in the way they were intended to.

The question is, how long before we realise the gravity of this situation? How long before we say, "enough is enough"? Canals, like other waterways, are vital for our existence. They serve as lifelines for local communities, facilitating drainage, supporting ecosystems, and contributing to the overall well-being of the people. But the encroachment and filling of these waterways with structures, farmland, and streets have exacerbated flooding, waterlogging and environmental degradation.

Often, this happened at the behest of the government itself. As a recent Rajuk survey showed, 68 public ponds within its jurisdiction alone have been illegally occupied and filled up by individuals and government organisations. Many canals also had to go through the same fate, as did many riverbanks, low-lying areas and open spaces.

While the canals that disappeared may not be recovered, preserving or restoring the ones that still exist is possible, experts say. We think this is where we must urgently focus on. A key challenge in this regard is the lack of specific authorities for many canals and the prevalence of collusion among land grabbers, responsible officials, and politicians that often enable encroachment. We must break this cycle. It will require decisive leadership, effective policies and strict enforcement, as well as active participation from all stakeholders.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Sad (0)
Reactions: Bilal9

No denying we're victims of climate change, but we're leaders of solutions, responses

1721174150777.webp

The world is still not taking climate change seriously enough, even though the annual United Nations Conferences of Parties (COPs) try to focus minds on the urgency of the task.

Ahead of COP29 in Azerbaijan this November, Bangladesh's Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Saber Hossain Chowdhury, has been in Brussels for talks with the EU's Climate Action Commissioner, Wopke Hoekstra, and to participate as a panelist in the opening session of the Second Conference of the Environment and Climate Mobilities Network (ECMN) in the city of Liège.

The minister spoke to Political Editor Nick Powell about his country's strategy and ambition to face the challenges of climate change, not as victims but as champions of a belief that heeding the warnings of science is also a pathway to a prosperous future.

Saber Hossain Chowdhury does not hide from the size of his task. He told me that Bangladesh faces, what he calls, "a rather frightening reality" of climate change "desertification, sea level rise, loss of food security, it's all there".

His country is what he describes as one of the world's "most dynamic, most populous delta", where the River Ganges and its tributaries reach the Bay of Bengal.

"When sea levels rise, people get displaced, you lose land. We'll lose about 17% of our land between now and 2050. There'll be forced migration of at least 12 million people. That's huge and that's in a country that's already one of the most densely populated in the world.

"We've had remarkable successes over the past years on food security. We've ensured food security but even that is now going to be challenged. Once you lose land, once you have erratic rainfall patterns, once you have salinity pollution, it's going to reduce your yields, these all contribute to make challenges steeper."

Unsurprisingly, he told me there is an "absolute imperative of ensuring that COP29 delivers -- and that delivery has to be across all the major themes of mitigation, adaptation and finance. Those themes include not only getting the planet on track to avoid unsustainable overheating --exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels -- but also meeting the enormous costs of adapting to the reality that humanity faces even if that target is met".

To make for effective adaptation, there have been pledges of money from the world's wealthier countries, who have long been the principal beneficiaries of economic growth achieved only at a huge ecological cost.

But the minister argues that it's time "to move from the billions to the trillions" of US dollars, if the world is going to get real about the size of the task. "It's a cost that is only increasing," he points out, "because we are so far away from the 1.5 degrees Celsius target -- that needs urgent action."

The idea of a loss-and-damage fund for countries like Bangladesh, which has played a negligible part in causing climate change but faces some of its most severe consequences, was first agreed upon at COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh. The European Union's support for the idea was decisive in obtaining agreement. At COP28 in Dubai, funds were pledged but only in the hundreds of millions.

Saber Hossain Chowdhury said Bangladesh needs over US$230 billion by 2050 just on account of adaptation. But he told me there is a crucial next step to make at COP29, even before the amount of money is agreed upon.

"Before we even go the quantum, it is absolutely imperative to have an agreed upon definition of climate finance … If we are not able to define climate finance, how do you ensure monitoring? How do you ensure transparency? Those are fundamental questions.

"The last thing you want to see is funds pledged in the past repackaged as climate finance. Climate finance must be new and additional, not old money channeled as new."

As for the amount, it could easily be more than estimated.

"In Bangladesh, we need US$9 billion every year for adaptation. That's assuming that global temperatures will be 1.5 [degrees above pre-industrial levels]. If it's anything above that, then the requirement goes up. So, every tenth of a degree increase in temperature matters. 1.5 is not just a target, it's the absolute maximum that science tells us we can go to."

The minister is also acutely aware of the need to agree at COP29 the rules and definitions of climate finance.

"It cannot be loans, commercial loans, because that's a double whammy. We haven't created the problem in the first instance but we're having to deal with it. Having to pay interest on the money we borrow, that's something which is not acceptable.

"It's really one of the last opportunities for the world to come together, show solidarity and really act on climate change, not just words and platitudes but action, implementation and delivery."

He argues that as the science is very clear and everyone has signed up and agreed to it, "there is absolutely no excuse for further delay".

"There has to be a continuity of the process. We cannot go back and try to open up issues that have already been discussed and resolved.

"We talk about sea level rise in Bangladesh but even America is going to be affected as will be Europe due to cryosphere changes -- melting snow, ice sheets, glaciers and permafrost. It's all at a very critical level and some are suggesting that 1.5 is no good, we should be targeting 1.0 because the damage that we see today -- floods, cyclones, typhoons -- they've become regular events. Urgent action based on science, that's the important thing. It's not what Bangladesh says, it's what the science says."

He also said, "That perspective isn't just a national perspective, it's also a global perspective because what happens to Bangladesh will not remain in Bangladesh. A country that is landlocked won't experience sea-level rises. But it will still have extreme heat. The frequency of hurricanes [is] increasing, the intensity of the harm that it causes is there for all to see. It won't just be the voice of Bangladesh, but a voice of the world."

Saber Hossain Chowdhury sees the European Union as a strong ally. It has been a crucial development partner for Bangladesh and offers a more equal trade and cooperation relationship as the country becomes increasingly prosperous.

"We've found the European Union to be quite progressive, when it comes to climate … Of course, there've been elections recently in Europe and we have to respect the mandate of the people. But through all that, when it comes to the climate agenda, there's going to be consistency. Europe is also very important in the global negotiations".

The minister recalled the breakthrough in the COP process achieved in Paris, "because you had a community of China, the European Union and the US that actually came together. To us, the European Union is actually a bridge between the various groups and how it can bring China and the US to the table, so that we have global consensus and solidarity, political ownership and commitment, is going to be very important".

He told me that no one is going to question the EU's net zero targets but when it comes to a country like Bangladesh trying to deliver on net zero, the realities of the developing countries and the least developed countries also have to be factored in.

"So, in terms of our exports of ready-made garments to Europe, how's that going to play out? You have due diligence; you have all of the new regulations that are coming in. But it's important that those are enforced in a transparent, a practical and a realistic manner."

Saber Hossain Chowdhury stressed to me that Bangladesh did not approach the enormous challenges it faces with the mindset of a victim.

"Of course we are victims, nobody is trying to deny that … victims to a greater extent than most of the other countries. But we are also a leader when it comes to solutions … responses to climate change".

He spoke of the world's growing interest in Bangladesh's pioneering work in creating an early warning system for natural disasters, such as severe storms and flooding. Even as global warming has worsened those phenomena; the country has reached a point where hardly any lives are lost when it is hit by these.

It was, he said, just one aspect of the remarkable transformation achieved under the leadership of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.

"Her vision is of Bangladesh not just being a victim but also a champion … The climate change trust fund set up in 2011, when climate wasn't a major issue -- or at least not as major as it is today.

"We have the Mujib Climate Prosperity Plan, which has a very ambitious trajectory. We want to move from vulnerability to resilience and then on to prosperity. How many countries in the world, how many prime ministers, have tried to reframe climate change as a potential pathway to prosperity?"

He added, "These are areas where Bangladesh, under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, is showing the path for others to follow. That's also important, that we're not just victims but we are also champions when it comes to adaptation. We are a role model when it comes to mobilising local communities. Locally-led adaptation is something that everyone follows".

He pointed to achievements across his portfolio of environment, forest and climate change. When he took office in January, he gave himself 100 days to start addressing Bangladesh's environmental problems. He told me that good progress has been made.

"We've done an evaluation and went public on this because I think it's important that we create space for accountability and public discussion on what we promised and what we delivered. So, there were 28 targets, 28 work programmes that we had initiated. The success rate in completing them, not taking into account those that were partially addressed, is around 78 percent.

"Of course, ideally, I would have loved to have seen 100 percent. But the fact that we are being transparent, acknowledging that there is room for improvement, this indicates how steep the challenges are. We addressed not just climate change but also air pollution and marine pollution. There's a global plastics treaty that is being negotiated now and hopefully, by the end of this year, we'll have a legally binding agreement."

He further said, "Air quality is a major concern for us and both air quality and marine pollution also have transboundary connections. You need national action of course, but you also must have regional aspiration -- countries in the region coming together to collaborate.

"Of the 10 most polluted rivers in the world, two are in Bangladesh. The Ganges and the Jamuna flow through Bangladesh. It's not just our waste, it is the waste of the surrounding countries because it all flows down to the Bay of Bengal. We're having to manage waste that we ourselves have not produced."

The minister added, "Our domestic priority is to reduce the cost of environmental degradation. We've done extremely well in terms of GDP growth and other economic fundamentals but we want to make sure that the growth trajectory continues. The cost of environmental degradation is high, not just in economic terms but also in terms of public health.

"We've also started to focus on biodiversity. The forests are a very important reserve for us. We've the largest mangrove forest in the world. So basically, environment, forests, biodiversity and climate change; these are the four pillars on the basis of which we will work".

To read the rest of the news, please click on the link above.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Bilal9

Recovering grabbed forest lands
WASI AHMED
Published :
Jul 16, 2024 21:49
Updated :
Jul 16, 2024 21:49
1721175596680.webp


Although it has been a wild guess that vast swathes of forest lands of the country are being grabbed every year, no statistics of the lost lands was available until an official statement weeks ago said that the government was going to intensify its efforts to recover 187,000 acres of illegally occupied forest lands from the grabbers. The statement is unnerving given the less than required forest lands the country is supposed to have. Over and above, it speaks of colossal unruliness of a section of people eager to dodge government regulations as well as make the most of the inaction of the authorities that understandably includes collusion, to say the least.

It was reported that until June, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change sent eviction proposals to the Deputy Commissioners until June, 2024 to recover 51,007 acres of occupied land and cleared 30,162 acres as of May last. Referring to the move, the minister heading the ministry said at a press conference that his ministry is going to send more eviction proposals to recover the lands from the grabbers, as part of what he termed a 100-day priority action plan. He added that the ministry is set to implement natural resource mapping to identify and locate natural resources like hills, forest, mountains, wetlands etc. so that the grabbers cannot occupy natural resources of the country.

The total forest area of Bangladesh is 2.6 million hectares, which is nearly 17.4 per cent of the total land area of the country. Forestry sector accounts for about 3.0 per cent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and 2.0 per cent of the labour force. However, these figures do not reflect the real importance of the sector in terms of monetary value. The GDP figure, however, does not count the large quantities of fuel wood, fodder, small timber and poles, thatching grass, medicinal herbs, and other forest produces extracted illegally. The low contribution of the forestry sector to the GDP is also explained by several other factors, e.g., the value added from wood processing is counted under the industry sector, rather than the forestry sector. The benefits provided by forest ecosystems include: goods such as timber, food, fuel and bio-products; ecological functions such as carbon storage, nutrient cycling, water and air purification, and maintenance of wildlife habitat; and social and cultural benefits. Services provided by forests cover a wide range of ecological, political, economic, social and cultural considerations and processes. The contribution of forest resources in protecting watershed and irrigation structures, reclaiming land from the sea, protecting coastal areas from storm damage, and in maintaining and upgrading the environmental quality, has not been quantified.

Owing to factors such as grabbing, over-exploitation, conversion of forest land into agriculture, forest resources in Bangladesh have been continuously depleting in terms of both area and quality. According to a Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), between 1990 and 2015, Bangladesh annually lost 2,600 hectares of primary forest (FAO 2015). Primary forest land gradually decreased from 1.494 million hectares in 1990 to 1.429 million hectares in 2015. Thus annual rate of deforestation in Bangladesh was 0.2 per cent during 1990-2015 (FAO, 2015).

The economic, social and environmental importance of ecosystem services provided by forests is increasingly recognised globally. The primary objective of sustainable forest management relies on benefits from ecological services without compromising forest's ability to provide those services. Still, forestland grabbing is a harsh reality all over the world. Governments with well planned forest management and preservation schemes are alert in addressing the matter as a top priority. More than 1.6 billion people depend on forest for food, water, fuel, medicines, traditional cultures and livelihoods. Tropical rainforests produce up to 40 per cent of all terrestrial primary plant production, and play a vital role in safeguarding the climate by naturally sequestering carbon. Yet, each year an average of 13 million hectares of forest land disappear.

Coming to what has transpired from official statement about the grabbed forest land in the country, it is clear that for a long time grabbers have been benefiting from what may euphemistically be called 'laxity' of the regulators. Now, swooping on them may not be easy, since the eviction process might involve litigation-a process notable only for its time-consuming nature. In many cases, the grabbers have raised structures, and also it is not unlikely that some of them might have obtained lease from the government, in violation of the regulations, taking advantage of technical loopholes. So, for the 100-day priority action plan to succeed, there has to be a well orchestrated approach to addressing the situation. In this connection, the authorities need to look into the lease of lands in the
Chottogram Hill Tracts. Chances are high that these lease deeds are perhaps not in conformity with forest preservation rules.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Bilal9

Dhaka filling up with garbage
Proper action needed to remove accumulated waste

1721866028256.webp

VISUAL: STAR

In the aftermath of the mayhem that saw the destruction of multiple public infrastructures across Dhaka city on July 18-20, we face a grim, putrid reality. While several service sectors have been severely disrupted due to the violent clashes and attacks, the city's garbage management system has also collapsed. According to media reports, since July 18, the authorities have been unable to collect household waste from residential and other areas. As a result, Dhaka has been filling up with garbage.

The events of the last one week disrupted the garbage management system of both city corporations. Garbage collection was halted during the complete shutdown called by the quota reform movement. Later, saboteurs vandalised garbage management offices and vehicles. According to a report by this daily, four garbage-carrying compactors and 29 vehicles including 10 garbage-carrying container carriers used by the Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC) were set ablaze at its zone-4 office in Mirpur-10 on Friday and Saturday. Meanwhile, in the Matuail landfill area, four garbage-carrying vehicles of Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC) were burnt down, Prothom Alo reported. Amounting to Tk 120 crore in losses, these made up one-fourth of DNCC's garbage management fleet and had the collective capacity of carrying 400 tonnes of waste.

The DNCC mayor has said his office is prioritising garbage removal and has staff working in shifts amid the curfew, but it will still take a week for things to go back to normal for all kinds of crisis. If the garbage is left to rot out in the open, it poses a serious threat to not only public health and well-being, but the environment as well.

The massive loss has greatly affected the city corporations' garbage management system, the result of which is visible now. Piles of household waste are seen lying on the streets, spreading stench around. Collectors have not visited households for the last four or five days, forcing people to dump their garbage either in the local garbage containers or directly on the streets, per another report in this daily. The secondary transfer stations are full to the brim and the garbage is now spilling onto the streets in several areas of the city. We understand that this is an unprecedented situation, and the city authorities have limited resources at the moment. But they should have had a back-up plan.

The DNCC mayor has said his office is prioritising garbage removal and has staff working in shifts amid the curfew, but it will still take a week for things to go back to normal for all kinds of crisis. If the garbage is left to rot out in the open, it poses a serious threat to not only public health and well-being, but the environment as well. Moreover, if it rains, the garbage could block the drains and cause water-logging, exacerbating the problem. We urge the city corporations to be more prudent in handling the situation and mobilise the available resources to urgently remove all the garbage from the streets to prevent another potential crisis.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Bilal9

How to decolonise our battle against climate change
by Laurie Parsons 18 August, 2024, 00:00

1723941159086.webp

| —Counter Punch

Most colonial economies were organised around extraction, providing the raw materials that drove imperial growth. As a result, even when the imperial administration is taken out, the underlying economic structures put in place by colonisers are very difficult to get away from and continue to hold newly independent countries back, writes Laurie Parsons

ALMOST everything we buy exploits the environment and the people who depend on it to a greater or lesser extent. Almost everything we buy contributes to climate breakdown through emissions, local environmental degradation, or, most commonly, both. Yet, in a world where greenwashing is so commonplace that almost every product proclaims ecological benefits, it tends not to be seen that way. In fact, it tends not to be seen at all.

Carbon emissions and pollution are a phase that we all pass through, meaning that the ability — and crucially the money — to avoid the ratcheting risks of climate change is something we have earned, and others too will earn as each nation continues inexorably along its separate curve. Wealthy countries accept this narrative because it is comfortable and provides a logical and moral explanation of the relative safety and health of the rich world.

But what if it wasn’t true? What if one place was devastated because the other was clean? Just as carbon emissions are not acts of God, neither is exposure to the results of those emissions. In other words, you can’t remove money from the geography of disaster risk.

This is carbon colonialism: the latest incarnation of an age-old system in which natural resources continue to be extracted, exported, and profited from far from the people they used to belong to. It is, in many ways, an old story, but what is new is the hidden cost of that extraction: the carbon bill footed in inverse relation to the resource feast.

Most colonial economies were organised around extraction, providing the raw materials that drove imperial growth. As a result, even when the imperial administration is taken out, the underlying economic structures put in place by colonisers are very difficult to get away from and continue to hold newly independent countries back.

On a basic level, exporting raw materials adds less economic value to the country that does it than processing, manufacturing, and reselling those materials, so for every watt of energy, every hectare of land, and every hour of work used to make goods exported from the global North to the South, the South has to generate, use, and work many more units to pay for it.

Decolonising climate change

WE ALREADY have the ways and means to decolonise how we measure, mitigate, and adapt to climate change.

This task is as sizable as it is vital, but at its core are three priorities. First, carbon emissions targets based on national production must be abandoned in favour of consumption-based measures, which, though readily available, tend to be marginalised for rich nations’ political convenience. Secondly, with half of emissions in some wealthy economies now occurring overseas, environmental and emissions regulation must be applied as rigorously to supply chains as they are to domestic production.

By adopting these new viewpoints, we can aim towards a final priority: recognising how the global factory manufactures the landscape of disaster. Our globalised economy is built on foundations designed to siphon materials and wealth to the rich world while leaving waste in its place.

Yet there is, as ever, another way. It is possible to reject the globalisation of environmental value by giving voice to the people it belongs to. Environments do not have to be merely abstract commodities.

Giving greater value to how people think about their local environments is seen as a way to decolonise our environmental thinking, move away from extractivism, and perhaps forestall the slow death of nature that began in the 1700s.

Environmental myths and how to think differently

ONE of the most widely shared myths in climate change discourse is that climate change increases the likelihood of natural disasters. This burden is ‘disproportionately’ falling upon poorer countries. Yet, it is fundamentally flawed. Climate change is not causing more natural disasters because disasters are not natural in the first place. They do not result from storms, floods, or droughts alone, but when those dangerous hazards meet vulnerability and economic inequality.

A hurricane, after all, means something completely different to the populations of Singapore and East Timor. This difference is no accident of geography but of a global economy that ensures that some parts of the world remain more vulnerable to climate change than others. Natural disasters are, therefore, economic disasters: the result of centuries of unequal trade and the specific, everyday impacts of contemporary commerce.

With rich countries doing an ever-diminishing share of their manufacturing, the responsibility to report real-world emissions is left to international corporations, which have little incentive to report accurate information on their supply chains.

The environments of the rich world are becoming cleaner and safer, even in an increasingly uncertain environment. The resources needed to tackle the challenges of climate change are accruing and being spent to protect their privileged populations.

Yet, for most of the world, the opposite is true. Natural resources continue to flow ever outward, with only meagre capital returning in compensation. Forests are being degraded by big and small actors as climate and market combine to undermine traditional livelihoods. Factory workers are toiling in sweltering conditions. Fishers are facing ever-declining livelihoods.

In other words, we have all the tools we need to solve climate breakdown but lack control or visibility over the production processes that shape it. From legal challenges to climate strikes and new constitutions, people are waking up to the myths that shape our thinking on the environment. They are waking up to the fact that climate change has never been about undeveloped technologies but always about unequal power.

As the impacts of climate breakdown become ever more apparent, this can be a moment of political and social rupture, of the wheels finally beginning to come off the status quo.

Demand an end to the delays. Demand an end to tolerance for the brazenly unknown in our economy. Demand an end to carbon colonialism.

CounterPunch.org, August 16. Laurie Parsons is a senior lecturer in human geography at Royal Holloway, University of London, and principal investigator of the projects The Disaster Trade: The Hidden Footprint of UK Imports and Hot Trends: How the Global Garment Industry Shapes Climate Vulnerability in Cambodia. He is the author of Carbon Colonialism: How Rich Countries Export Climate.​
 

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Bilal9

55 acres of forest land recovered from former minister Hasan Mahmud's brother

1724713915272.webp


The Forest Department today recovered at least 55 acres of forest land that had been illegally occupied by Ershad Mahmud, brother of former Foreign Minister Hasan Mahmud, in Rangunia upazila of Chattogram.

A team from the Forest Department, led by Maruf Hossain, assistant conservator of forests of the Chattogram South Forest Division, carried out the operation. The team removed several structures during the drive, including six sheds of a farm and a restaurant.

The operation began at 10:00am and continued until 4:00pm at Shukhbilash village under Padua union in Rangunia upazila, confirmed Abdullah Al Mamun, divisional forest officer (DFO) of the Chattogram South Forest Division.

"We will soon conduct another drive to recover additional forest land where Ershad Mahmud has planted orange," the DFO added.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Love (+3)
Reactions: Bilal9

Forest encroachers will be punished, vows Environment Adviser Rizwana
Published :
Aug 27, 2024 23:48
Updated :
Aug 27, 2024 23:48


1724803815758.webp


Environment, Forest and Climate Change Adviser Syeda Rizwana Hasan has said that any influential person involved in encroaching on forest land will face the full force of the law.

She sounded the warning a day after the Forest Department reclaimed 55 acres of land reportedly under the illegal possession of Ershad Mahmud, the younger brother of former foreign and environment minister and Awami League joint general secretary Hasan Mahmud, bdnews24.com reports.

The land was reclaimed during a raid in the Sukbilas village of the Padua Union in Chattogram’s Rangunia Upazila on Monday.

For over a decade, Ershad had been clearing forest trees and occupying the land to build six houses for a dairy farm.

He had grabbed Forest Department land near the Dashmail area on the Rangamati-Bandarban road, constructing a park and restaurant named Muktijoddha Park.

He also created three ponds in a hilly area by blocking water flow.

However, the Forest Department has not provided any information regarding legal actions against the encroachers after reclaiming the land.

When contacted on Tuesday, Rizwana told bdnews24.com: "I saw [on Monday] that it has been evicted. There are more such incidents in Bangladesh. I will establish a system where ministers, officials, NGOs, land grabbers—whoever illegally occupies protected forest land or any other land—will face punishment."

"Illegally occupying forest department land is a criminal offence. Whoever does it will have to face consequences,” added Rizwana, herself an award-winning activist campaigning for environmental justice for decades.

“The government is currently busy dealing with the floods. I know this area has been cleared, and more [illegal establishments] will be evicted. We will try to bring all the criminals together and ensure they face justice."​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Love (+3)
Reactions: Bilal9

Members Online

No members online now.

Latest Posts

Back
 
G
O
 
H
O
M
E