[🇧🇩] Humanitarian Corridor to Myanmar: Implications for Bangladesh.

[Saif]

Bangladesh govt urged to assess risks for ‘humanitarian passage’ to Rakhine

Experts including academics, a former diplomat and a retired army officer have suggested that the government should consult political parties in the absence of parliament and assess risk factors before allowing a ‘humanitarian passage’ to the...

www.newagebd.net

Bangladesh govt urged to assess risks for ‘humanitarian passage’ to Rakhine
Mustafizur Rahman 03 May, 2025, 00:37

Experts including academics, a former diplomat and a retired army officer have suggested that the government should consult political parties in the absence of parliament and assess risk factors before allowing a ‘humanitarian passage’ to the conflict-ridden Rakhine State of Myanmar since it is a matter of national security.

They said that Bangladesh should take into consideration its international legal consequences and security aspects as well before giving such a passage to the conflict zone, considered to be highly sensitive from a geopolitical point of view, as global powers like China, Russia and India have their own interests there.

There is a risk of getting involved in a ‘proxy war’ by establishing such a corridor to the conflict zone through Bangladesh, said retired Major General ANM Muniruzzaman, the president of the independent think tank Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies.

‘Rakhine is a complex conflict zone where China, Russia and India have geopolitical interests. They may react adversely if it affects their interests and it will not be possible for us to absorb it,’ he said on Wednesday.

He said that the interim government of Professor Muhammad Yunus must consult with the political parties and obtain their consent before accepting the United Nations’ proposal since it was a vital national decision and there was no parliament in the country at present.

On April 27, foreign adviser Md Touhid Hossain disclosed Bangladesh’s position on the UN proposal for providing a humanitarian channel to the Rakhine State of Myanmar facing civil war since 2021.

The adviser said that Bangladesh agreed in principle to provide a humanitarian passage to Rakhine in line with a UN proposal that drew repercussions from various quarters including political parties.

A former ambassador and the president of the Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, M Humayun Kabir, underlined the need for ensuring security as the Myanmar government did not have any control there.

‘All stakeholders including political parties must be consulted since it is a highly important issue involving security aspects,’ he said.

Humayun, also a former foreign affairs secretary, said that it was important to settle first who would ensure the security of the passage and to make sure whether the aid reached the target people in the Rakhine State.

Bangladesh Nationalist Party secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, speaking at a programme on April 28, strongly objected to the government decision, stating that the interim government should have consulted political parties beforehand, as the issue concerned the country’s independence, sovereignty and the future peace and stability of the region.

‘Before making any decision on providing a humanitarian passage to Rakhine, the government should hold discussions with all stakeholders and take the opinions of the political parties. Because, it involves serious matters of national sovereignty and security,’ Ganosamhati Andolan chief coordinator Zonayed Saki said on Thursday.

Otherwise, such a decision related to interrelated matters like geopolitics, development in Rakhine, and the Rohingya crisis would create a distance between the interim government and the country’s people, he said.

He said that the government should also assess risk factors and share those with the political parties so that the people are aware of Bangladesh’s strategy and stay with the government in any situation over these issues.

The international affairs experts, however, said that Bangladesh could go ahead with the proposal if all the parties including the Myanmar government, the Arakan Army and the Bangladesh government reach an agreement over the matter with the UN in providing aid to the Rakhine State where ethnic armed group Arakan Army had taken control of almost 80 per cent of the area from the Myanmar junta forces.

They added that there was a fear that more Rohingyas might try to enter Bangladesh in case of an acute food crisis in Rakhine as the Myanmar junta government had cut off all supplies to the area after they had lost their control amid fighting with rebel groups in different areas, they added.

‘Bangladesh may see another influx of Rohingya seeking refuge here if there is a famine-like situation in Rakhine,’ Humayun Kabir expressed fear.

He said that providing the humanitarian channel to Rakhine did not have any link with the Rohingya repatriation at this stage.

Dhaka University international relations professor Niloy Ranjan Biswas also said that security was the most important issue in the case where there were many parties to the conflict in Myanmar.

He, however, said that international intervention was necessary for ensuring a permanent ceasefire and the repatriation of Rohingyas from Bangladesh as well since it was considered as the primary solution to the Rohingya crisis.

‘A temporary ceasefire is there following the recent earthquake in Myanmar. But a permanent ceasefire is necessary to establish the proposed humanitarian corridor so that security is ensured. This is why international intervention is needed for sending aid in a secured manner and sending back the Rohingyas to their homeland,’ Professor Niloy said.

DU Professor Syeda Rozana Rashid of the same department, however, said that Bangladesh did not have other options, but to allow the humanitarian passage under the UN to begin the repatriation process at the earliest.

Asked whether Bangladesh would become a party to the conflict, she said that it was too early to reach such a conclusion.

More than 1.3 million Myanmar nationals of the Rohingya community have fled to Bangladesh amid brutal atrocities in the Rakhine State by the Myanmar military since 2017, according to Bangladesh government data.

Meanwhile, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has pressed the Office of the Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commissioner to ensure accommodation of 1.13 lakh more Rohingyas, who entered Bangladesh between November 2023 and April 27, 2025, amid uncertainty of repatriation.

RRRC officials said that Rohingyas continued to enter Bangladesh as conflicts in Myanmar’s Rakhine state went on.​

 

[Saif]

No agreement on ‘humanitarian corridor’ for Rakhine: Khalilur

National Security Adviser Khalilur Rahman has said Bangladesh has not agreed to any ‘humanitarian corridor’ into war-torn Rakhine State of Myanmar to allow transit of humanitarian aid to Rohingya people. Speaking as a special guest at a seminar titled "Repatriation of Rohingya in Bangl

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

No agreement on ‘humanitarian corridor’ for Rakhine: Khalilur
FE ONINE REPORT
Published :
May 04, 2025 16:51
Updated :
May 04, 2025 16:51

National Security Adviser Khalilur Rahman has said Bangladesh has not agreed to any ‘humanitarian corridor’ into war-torn Rakhine State of Myanmar to allow transit of humanitarian aid to Rohingya people.

Speaking as a special guest at a seminar titled "Repatriation of Rohingya in Bangladesh: Strategic Implications on Regional Security and Ways Ahead", he, called the term ‘humanitarian corridor’ misleading and misused.

"We have not discussed a humanitarian corridor. We have no agreement on a humanitarian corridor. We have no agreement on anything yet with the parties," said Khalilur, who is also the high representative for the Rohingya issue.

Khalilur clarified that even the UN secretary-general did not use the term ‘corridor’, which, he said, carries specific implications. "He used the term 'humanitarian channel', which is completely different," he added.

The Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP) and the Armed Forces Division (AFD) organised the seminar.

Mentioning that for any humanitarian effort to proceed, parties involved must agree, Khalilur said the Arakan Army had questioned how they could suspend armed actions while Myanmar's military continued airstrikes.

"We discussed this with Myanmar's government. They agreed not to launch airstrikes if the Arakan Army halts its ground operations. No fighting, no airstrikes -- that gives us a pause in armed conflict. That's what we have achieved so far," he said.​

 

[Saif]

Aid channel may aid Rohingya repatriation: NSA

Channeling aid to Rakhine State in Myanmar from Bangladesh may open up an opportunity for Rohingya repatriation, says a government high official while dispelling hearsay about corridor discussion. Dr Khalilur Rahman, National Security Adviser and High Representative of the Chief Adviser of the int

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Bangladesh sets four conditions for Rakhine route
Aid channel may aid Rohingya repatriation: NSA
Channel and corridor not same, no discussion on humanitarian corridor held
FE REPORT
Published :
May 05, 2025 00:39
Updated :
May 05, 2025 00:39

p1-highlight-outlineChanneling aid to Rakhine State in Myanmar from Bangladesh may open up an opportunity for Rohingya repatriation, says a government high official while dispelling hearsay about corridor discussion.

Dr Khalilur Rahman, National Security Adviser and High Representative of the Chief Adviser of the interim government, Sunday outlined four conditions for providing such a humanitarian channel to the famine-stricken sate in Myanmar.

The conditions are end of conflict in Rakhine State during the aid- supply period, unimpeded access of aid, non-discrimination in aid, and non-weaponisation of aid.

Addressing a seminar on the Rohingya crisis, organised by the Armed forces Division, in Dhaka, he made it clear that 'humanitarian corridor' and 'humanitarian channel' are separate issues-and Bangladesh has not discussed humanitarian corridor with anybody, and no agreement on aid corridor was made with anyone either.

"I've heard questions raised about humanitarian corridor, and I say, very clearly, that humanitarian corridor and humanitarian channel are not same as 'corridor' has got specific connotations. We used the term humanitarian channel, which is completely different."

The government has told the United Nations that it should ensure these conditions for providing aid to the famine-hit Rakhine State.

Highlighting the importance of channelling aid, he also notes that if aid is not made available to Rakhine State, another wave of Rohingya influx into Bangladesh may take place which the country cannot simply afford.

Referring to the proposal of a political party which called for creating new territory for the Rohingya population in Myanmar, he categorically said Bangladesh always believes in territorial integrity of Myanmar and this stance was conveyed to Myanmar government time and again.

"We do not support dismemberment of Myanmar, and we respect your territorial integrity. This is our position, not that they're second guessing, but I'm reassuring so much for this."

Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain also spoke at the seminar organised by the Armed Forces Division of the defence ministry. Principal Staff Officer SM Kamrul Hasan was the special guest.

Explaining how the aid channel may help Rohingya repatriation the NSA said both Myanmar government and the Arakan Army had agreed to stop war during the period when aid would be channeled in.

"So, no fighting, no bombing. That gives you a pause in our country, so we reached up to that. That's what we have done."

"So in our estimate, we thought, okay, that means a period of absence of what I'm not calling peace, absence of what could finally come in and if properly handled, this could be the beginning of conditions of peace, creating an enabling environment for refugees to return."

Regarding reports in a section of Indian media which alleged Bangladesh interim government wants to start proxy war, he said in a certain neighbouring country, a news portal is doing a disinformation campaign that Bangladesh's interim government is about to start a proxy war to take over Iranian states, install American domination there and exploit the resources.

"This whole business of this propaganda, this disinformation, was to somehow make Bangladeshis feel that the government is selling the country, or creating an adverse image of the United States, exactly when we were negotiating our trading with them. This is also meant to create distance between us and the people that we are talking," he told the defence affairs' meet.

"You see, ask yourself a very simple question before you make this conclusion, if we indeed run a proxy war on behalf of America, why isn't China saying anything?"

The national security adviser also posed a question "if we are acting as a proxy, in favour of the US, why China has been helping us in arranging meeting with the Myanmar government and other stakeholders".

He reminds that "China is not stupid" and that they know from where this campaign is being operated.

Bangladesh also wants to see Rohingyas in various positions in evolving administration in the Rakhine State, he said, referring to latest negotiations with the UN.

He notes that without the Rohingya representation, it's essentially a picture of ethnic cleansing. "We don't accept that, we convey this to the United Nations."

Dismissing the idea of integration of the Rohingya here, he says if Rohingyas are accepted as part of Bangladesh, it will soon become a jumping ground of stateless people. "This is not an option. This is our red line."

The national security adviser defends the move to establish contact with the Arakan Army, saying that when the Arakan Army flag was raised on the Myanmar side of the border, it was necessary to establish contact with them to manage the borders.

"It doesn't matter who is on the other side of our border-it's our duty and we are responsible for its protection. To make it secure and safe, we have to deal with whoever is on the other side."

Mr Rahman says despite its unique complexity, the government is hopeful about resolving the Rohingya crisis.

"This is too complex a problem, which cannot be left to second guessing. We want Rohingyas to go back, and we believe that we'll find it out for them to go back. This will not be easy, but we will do it."

The foreign adviser told the seminar that the latest Rohingya exodus in the face of brutality of the Myanmar security forces in 2017 resulted from the ethnic-cleansing operation and that is why he believes it could not be resolved through bilateral negotiations.

Urging the international community to resolve the crisis immediately, he said, "You are going to have in the camps a million or so young people, it would be naive to think that they will just spend their life peacefully in the camps, waiting for the relief to arrive, and having a little food and a little shed."

He is convinced that if this issue is not resolved, these people will become a problem for Bangladesh, and they will also become problem for the religion and the world at large.​

 

[Saif]

Bangladesh not to engage in any proxy war with Myanmar: National Security Adviser

Interim government’s National Security Adviser Khalilur Rahman has said Bangladesh will not engage in any “proxy war” with Myanmar for the US in the name of providing a “humanitarian corridor” to facilitate entering the Rakhine state. Rather, whatever is being publicised about those are nothing...

en.prothomalo.com

Bangladesh not to engage in any proxy war with Myanmar: National Security Adviser
Diplomatic Correspondent Dhaka
Published: 04 May 2025, 17: 39

Interim government’s National Security Adviser Khalilur Rahman addresses a seminar on Rohingya crisis at BUP on 4 May 2025 Prothom Alo

Interim government’s National Security Adviser Khalilur Rahman has said Bangladesh will not engage in any “proxy war” with Myanmar for the US in the name of providing a “humanitarian corridor” to facilitate entering the Rakhine state.

Disinformation and rumour is being spread in this regard, he stressed.

Khalilur Rahman made these remarks while speaking as the chief guest at a seminar on Rohingya repatriation at the auditorium of the Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP) on Sunday.

The Armed Forces Division and BUP jointly organised the seminar.

Khalilur Rahman, also the High Representative on the Rohingya issue, said Bangladesh respects the sovereignty of Myanmar.

He informed the seminar that they have conveyed the message to Myanmar that Bangladesh does not want anything that would create further instabilities in the neighbouring country.

Speaking about the “humanitarian corridor” to enter the Rakhine state in Myanmar through Bangladesh, the National Security Adviser said, “We did not discuss the humanitarian corridor issue; neither we made any decision about this nor we had any compromise with any side.”

Addressing the criticisms on the “humanitarian corridor” issue, Khalilur Rahman further said they discussed a “channel” to reach humanitarian assistance to the Rakhine state.

He insisted if something like this (channel) is established, it is supposed to run under the United Nations.

Aid and food assistance will pass through this, Khalilur added.​

 

[Saif]

Consensus a must to channel aid to Rakhine

The concept of a humanitarian or aid corridor is something relatively new to most people in Bangladesh. Yet, it has emerged as a central topic of national discussion following a recent UN-initiated proposal to channel aid to the famine-stricken Rakhine State in Myanmar, using routes that would trav

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Consensus a must to channel aid to Rakhine
MIR MOSTAFIZUR RAHAMAN

Published :
May 06, 2025 00:36
Updated :
May 06, 2025 00:36

The concept of a humanitarian or aid corridor is something relatively new to most people in Bangladesh. Yet, it has emerged as a central topic of national discussion following a recent UN-initiated proposal to channel aid to the famine-stricken Rakhine State in Myanmar, using routes that would traverse Bangladeshi territory. While on the surface, the humanitarian urgency of the matter cannot be understated, the nuances, implications, and possible fallout from such a decision merit careful scrutiny and, more importantly, broad-based national consensus.

There is no universally accepted definition of a humanitarian corridor. However, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) provides a broadly accepted framework: such corridors are usually agreements between warring parties to allow for the safe passage of civilians, humanitarian aid, or the evacuation of the wounded and sick during armed conflict. In this context, corridors can offer temporary relief and help prevent large-scale humanitarian disasters. However, their use must be carefully negotiated and monitored to avoid potential misuse or exacerbation of existing tensions.

Amid the growing debate in Bangladesh, the interim government has issued clarifications, drawing a clear line between a "humanitarian corridor" and a "humanitarian channel." While they maintain that Bangladesh has not entered into any agreement regarding a humanitarian corridor, they admit to being in negotiations with the United Nations regarding the possibility of an aid channel to Rakhine State.

Government officials argue that establishing such a channel could be instrumental in promoting conditions conducive to the repatriation of Rohingya refugees currently residing in Bangladesh. The logic is straightforward: if aid is delivered effectively, and if both the Myanmar government and the Arakan Army uphold their reported agreement to cease hostilities during the aid distribution period, it might foster a fragile but necessary peace. This, in turn, could provide the Rohingya population with the security and basic services necessary to consider returning to their homeland voluntarily and safely.

To that end, Bangladesh has reportedly laid out several non-negotiable conditions for the aid channel: cessation of hostilities in Rakhine during the aid period, unimpeded access to aid, non-discriminatory distribution, and a guarantee that aid will not be weaponised. These stipulations are not only reasonable but essential. In the volatile context of Rakhine, where ethnic and political conflicts remain entrenched, even well-intentioned aid can be diverted or manipulated for political or military advantage.

Nevertheless, this issue is far from straightforward. Critics of the aid channel proposal raise valid concerns that should not be overlooked. Chief among them is the security threat such a channel might pose to Bangladesh. If appropriate monitoring mechanisms are not in place, aid could be weaponised or diverted to fuel further conflict between the Arakan Army and the Myanmar military. Such a scenario would not only defeat the humanitarian purpose but could also embroil Bangladesh in a conflict beyond its borders, damaging bilateral relations and exposing the country to retaliatory actions.

There is also the danger of setting a precedent. Agreeing to such an initiative without robust oversight could be interpreted by internal or external actors as a sign of weakness or naïveté in Bangladesh's foreign policy and national security strategy. Moreover, even with a temporary ceasefire, there is no guarantee that hostilities will not resume once aid has been delivered. Without sustained peace, the long-term objective of Rohingya repatriation will remain as elusive as ever.

An additional layer of concern surrounds the issue of national sovereignty and democratic legitimacy. Many political parties and civil society leaders have questioned the legitimacy of such negotiations taking place under the auspices of a non-elected, interim government. They argue that decisions involving foreign aid operations, especially in a region as sensitive as Rakhine, must be taken by an elected parliament that represents the collective will of the people. This is not an issue to be handled in isolation by bureaucrats or unelected officials, no matter how well-intentioned. At the very least, there must be consultations with political parties across the spectrum to reach a national consensus.

This scribe does not oppose the idea of extending humanitarian assistance to suffering civilians in Rakhine. On the contrary, we affirm that as a responsible regional actor and a compassionate nation, Bangladesh should do everything within reason to alleviate the humanitarian crisis. However, such actions must be taken in a manner that preserves national security, respects domestic political processes, and ensures accountability and transparency.

The government's rationale -- that preventing another influx of Rohingya refugees is a national priority -- is entirely valid. Bangladesh already shoulders a disproportionately large burden of hosting over a million Rohingya refugees. A fresh wave would stretch the country's already limited resources and further complicate an already difficult situation. However, using aid as a strategic tool to prevent refugee inflow is not a guaranteed solution. If mismanaged, it could provoke new tensions with Myanmar or with internal political stakeholders, further destabilising the region.

The proposed aid channel must be subjected to rigorous scrutiny and built on solid guarantees from both the United Nations and all stakeholders involved. The international community must play a proactive role not only in delivering aid but also in ensuring that it is used appropriately and that ceasefire commitments are upheld. Aid without peace, after all, can only be a band-aid on a festering wound.

Most importantly, this initiative must not proceed without a national conversation. The people of Bangladesh have the right to know what is being negotiated in their name, especially when it pertains to national security and international relations. We urge the government to initiate open dialogue with political parties, civil society groups, and experts in foreign policy and humanitarian law. Holding parliamentary debates or at least convening a special consultative committee could ensure greater transparency and foster public trust.

In conclusion, while the idea of channeling aid to Rakhine is rooted in humanitarian urgency and regional stability, it carries serious implications that demand consensus, caution, and comprehensive oversight. Bangladesh must balance its compassion with caution, its pragmatism with principle. Only through national unity and international cooperation can such a sensitive mission succeed.

Let us not forget that humanitarian intentions, however noble, can falter without a framework grounded in transparency, security, and accountability. For the sake of national security, regional peace, and democratic integrity, consensus must come first-before the first truckload of aid crosses the border into Rakhine.​

 

[Saif]

China aloof from aid channeling to Rakhine: Envoy

China is not involved with the UN initiative to channel aid supplies into Myanmar's Rakhine State from Bangladesh, says the Chinese envoy, also reaffirming their stand on noninterference in internal affairs. Speaking at a function Thursday in Dhaka, the Chinese Ambassador in Bangladesh, Yao Wen, a

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Teesta project ought to start soon
China aloof from aid channeling to Rakhine: Envoy
Chinese commerce minister coming with over 100 investors

FE REPORT
Published :
May 09, 2025 00:45
Updated :
May 09, 2025 00:45

China is not involved with the UN initiative to channel aid supplies into Myanmar's Rakhine State from Bangladesh, says the Chinese envoy, also reaffirming their stand on noninterference in internal affairs.

Speaking at a function Thursday in Dhaka, the Chinese Ambassador in Bangladesh, Yao Wen, also said China is ready to work with Bangladesh to push ahead with major initiatives and projects, including high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, the Mongla Port and Chinese Economic and Industrial Zone in Chittagong as well as the Teesta River project.

He also informs that the Chinese commerce minister is coming to Bangladesh this month at the head of a big team of over 100 investors.

"For the corridor issue, some so-called humanitarian corridor, I should say China is not involved. It is, as far as my understanding is concerned, is something initiated by United Nations agencies to provide humanitarian supply to Rakhine State for people affected by the conflict," he said to a question after a seminar on China-Bangladesh ties.

Elaborating on China's stance on this issue he further said, "I learned also that Myanmar, even the Arakan Army, was involved, but China is not involved in this matter."

The envoy also cited some clarification, either by the foreign adviser or the National Security Advisor, on this issue and said China always respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of any country.

"We do not interfere in the internal affairs of any country," Mr Wen said, hoping that Bangladesh and Myanmar can solve the Rohingya issue through peaceful dialog and promote the process of repatriation.

About a proposal raised by a political party for creating a separate territory in Myanmar for Rohingya Muslims, he said he was not aware of any such idea. Jamaat E Islami also denied the report that said it had raised such proposal in their meeting with the Chinese envoy.

Asked about the latest update on the long-stalled Teesta River management project, he said as Bangladesh welcomed Chinese participation in the project, China is ready to get involved.

"I should say we are ready. We are willing to offer our help. But now it is up to Bangladesh to make a decision whether you want to move forward."

Referring to suggestions for implementing the project either bilateral way, or trilateral way, or by international consortium, he said it is for Bangladesh decide. But he noted that the Teesta project should be started immediately.

The Chinese envoy earlier delivered his speech at the seminar titled 'Five Decades of Bangladesh-China Relations: Towards a New Height'.

Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS) organised the seminar where Ambassador AFM Gousal Azam Sarker, Chairman of BIISS, and its DG Major-General Iftekhar Anis also spoke. Professor Imtiaz Ahmed of the International Relations Department of Dhaka University presented the keynote.

The diplomat said since the establishment of the diplomatic ties between the two countries On 4 October 1975, the China-Bangladesh bilateral ties have flourished across all dimensions - from political and economic cooperation to military exchanges and cultural connections.

The mutual understanding and people-to-people exchanges deepened and elevated this relationship to what it is today - a Comprehensive Strategic Cooperative Partnership, he said.

He highlighted Chinese President Xi Jinping's foreign-policy principles: "All countries, regardless of their size, strength and wealth, are equal members of the international community. They have the right to equally participate in regional and international affairs."

China champions a multi-polar world where sovereign equality is paramount. "Every nation, regardless of size, strength or wealth, deserves full respect for its sovereignty and dignity. No country shall interfere in others' internal affairs, and all states have the fundamental right to independently choose their social systems and paths of development."

He notes that Chinese Belt and Road programme has injected strong impetus into its economic growth, substantially improved the infrastructure, and has made remarkable contributions to the wellbeing of Bangladeshi people.

Over the years, the Chinese enterprises have created 550,000 job opportunities for Bangladesh, built 8 railways, 12 roads, 21 bridges, and 31 power stations.

Mr Wen said China is the largest investor in Bangladesh since the formation of the interim government. China has granted zero-tariff treatment to Bangladeshi exports, promised to extend this preferential policy to 2028, two years after the graduation from the LDC status.

About the Chinese investment in Bangladesh he informed that since last August, over 15 Chinese companies have signed investment agreements with Bangladesh, with a total intended investment of around USD400 million.

More than 30 companies have signed letters of investment intent with the Chittagong Chinese Economic and Industrial Zone, with a total investment of over $1.0 billion.

China is also accelerating the exportation of Bangladeshi mangoes to China, and by early June this year, the first batch of fresh mangoes will be on the Chinese market, he added.

"On top of that, procedures for importing Bangladeshi jackfruit and guava are also ongoing. We hope that Bangladesh can soon open up Hilsa export to China -- after all, Chinese foodies can't wait to enjoy this delicious fish on their dining tables."

He points out that as more of Bangladesh's quality agri-products make their way to China, and as more Chinese companies bring investment and innovation to this vibrant land, something incredible happen.

He hopes Bangladesh's industries will grow stronger, supply chains will become more robust, and -- most importantly -- people's lives will be better with new opportunities and greater prosperity.

He also mentions that Chinese Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao will lead more than 100 Chinese investors to visit Bangladesh at the end of this month.

"During the visit, the two sides will co-host a trade and investment-exchange event, where hundreds of Chinese and Bangladeshi enterprises will engage and explore more cooperation opportunities."

Meanwhile, the 15th Meeting of the China-Bangladesh Joint Economic and Trade Commission will be held to agree on concrete measures to further economic and trade cooperation.

He said due to the expansion of bilateral trade and investment, the number of Chinese enterprises and people in Bangladesh have continued to rise. Now, there are 68 flights operating weekly, which transport more than 13,000 passengers, linking the two countries more closely together.

"And it's good news to hear that the air route from Kunming to Chittagong is also set to open soon."

He announced that a consignment of advanced automated rehabilitation equipment, valued 1.5 million US dollars, has already arrived in Bangladesh.

He said as the most trustworthy friend and a reliable development partner, China will continue to stand by the interim government, support Bangladesh's independence and sovereignty, and help the Bangladeshi people to build a better and more prosperous new Bangladesh.

"China is encouraging more Chinese enterprises to invest and do business in Bangladesh, expanding cooperation in areas ranging from digital economy to green economy from marine economy to infrastructure and water conservancy."

China has responded favourably to Chief Adviser's proposal on industrial relocation, to create a deeper industrial supply chains integration, and achieve the modernisation of both nations.

To further advance healthcare collaboration, the embassy has introduced special visa-facilitation measures for Bangladeshi citizens seeking medical treatment in China.

He said China stood ready to support Bangladesh on matters that include cooperation in South Asia, regional connectivity, the Rohingya issue, and to coordinate positions in the United Nations and other multilateral forums to release the positive effects of China-Bangladesh friendship to the region and the world, maintain peace and stability in South Asia, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of developing countries.

About the escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan, the Chinese envoy said, "India launched military strikes on targets in Pakistan on the early morning of May 7. China finds that regrettable and is concerned about the ongoing situation. India and Pakistan are and will always be each other's neighbours. They're both China's neighbours as well. China opposes all forms of terrorism and calls for an impartial investigation at an early date."

China urges both sides to act in the interest of peace and stability, stay calm, exercise restraint and refrain from taking actions that may further complicate the situation.

Mr Wen said as an independent sovereign state, Bangladesh must be free from external interference.

"The Bangladeshi people have the right to determine their own path of development. China has consistently and firmly supported Bangladesh in upholding its independence, sovereignty, and national dignity, as well as in pursuing a modernisation path suited to its national conditions".

In turn, he notes, Bangladesh has steadfastly upheld the one-China principle, rejected the so-called "Taiwan independence," and adhered to the principle of non-interference in others' internal affairs. It has also resolutely defended the authority of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 and supported China's positions on questions of its core interests, including the Taiwan question, Xinjiang -related question, human rights, and the South China Sea.

He mentions that recently, the US side has, through multiple channels, expressed willingness to engage in dialogue on tariffs and related issues and China has cautiously decided to engage with them, taking into account global expectations, national interests, and appeals from American industries and consumers.

"Vice Premier He Lifeng, as the Chinese lead person for China-U.S. economic and trade affairs, will have a meeting with the U.S. lead person, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, during his visit to Switzerland from May 9 to 12," Mr Wen informs.​

 

[Saif]

Govt’s position on corridor remains ambiguous: Anu Muhammad

The interim government's first responsibility should have been to disclose the agreements signed during the tenure of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

en.prothomalo.com

Govt’s position on corridor remains ambiguous: Anu Muhammad
Staff Correspondent Dhaka
Published: 14 May 2025, 20: 07

Speakers at a views-exchange event hosted by Bangladesh Revolutionary Communist League at the Dhaka Reporters' Unity on 13 May, 2025. Noman Siddique

Professor Anu Muhammad has alleged that there is a type of ambiguity and contradiction in the government’s stance over the proposed corridor to Rakhine. It seems they are trying to hide something.

He made the statement while speaking at a discussion on the country’s sovereignty, national security, regional stability and geopolitical issues, hosted by Bangladesh Revolutionary Communist League at the Dhaka Reporters' Unity on Tuesday.

He noted that any secret agreement goes against the spirit of the July mass uprising. “There is significant ambiguity and contradiction in the government's stance on the corridor, which indicates they are trying to hide something. But the mass uprising did not take place for such a situation… An agreement will be signed secretly, keeping the people in complete ignorance.”

The economist and civic activist further emphasised the need to disclose all agreements Bangladesh has signed with India. “The government has done nothing regarding the Adani agreement, which is a terrible deal. Such deals were cancelled in multiple countries, including Sri Lanka. But in Bangladesh, no initiative has been taken to cancel it.”

Anu Muhammad also argued that the interim government's first responsibility should have been to disclose the agreements signed with the United States, India, and China during the tenure of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina. “Publishing these agreements and cancelling those contrary to the national interest should have been their first priority in reforms.”

Saiful Haque, general secretary of the Revolutionary Workers Party, highlighted the gravity of the corridor issue, saying, “since the corridor involves national sovereignty, it cannot be taken lightly. Still, the Rohingya crisis is a significant issue on humanitarian ground, and there are many alternative ways. Since the corridor and the proposed new mooring terminal are linked to national interests, there is no way to see them lightly. A public hearing is essential.”

Iqbal Kabir Zahid, general secretary of the Revolutionary Communist League, said people hoped that the government would establish a democratic Bangladesh free from discrimination as per aspiration of the July uprising. “However, we are observing with concern that the Muhammad Yunus-led government is going to make decisions on issues related to the country’s sovereignty, national interests, and security, regional stability, and geopolitics.”

Abdus Sattar, a leader of the Revolutionary Communist League, read out a written statement on the occasion.​

 

[Saif]

Country’s sovereignty under threat now: Mirza Abbas

BNP standing committee member Mirza Abbas said the country’s independence and sovereignty are at stake today. “Let me be very clear, we were in the jaws of a dog earlier but now we are in the jaws of a tiger. We are talking about elections because we see that our country's independence and...

en.prothomalo.com

Country’s sovereignty under threat now: Mirza Abbas
Staff Correspondent Dhaka
Published: 15 May 2025, 22: 51

BNP standing committee member Mirza Abbas File photo

BNP standing committee member Mirza Abbas said the country’s independence and sovereignty are at stake today.

“Let me be very clear, we were in the jaws of a dog earlier but now we are in the jaws of a tiger. We are talking about elections because we see that our country's independence and sovereignty are not secure. The interim government is meant to conduct elections, not to make policy decisions for the country. The decision to provide a corridor in Myanmar’s Rakhine should be made by an elected government—you do not have the authority to make such decisions.”

He made these remarks on Thursday afternoon while speaking as the chief guest at the inaugural ceremony of BNP's Cumilla divisional membership renewal and distribution programme at the District Shilpakala Academy auditorium.

Mentioning that that BNP’s good days have not yet arrived, Mirza Abbas said, “Many people think BNP's good days have returned. But it is not. Our leader Tarique Rahman has not returned to the country, or he is not yet able to. BNP is facing many challenges right now. Earlier, the party only had one opponent—the Awami League—with whom we had to battle.

Now, the BNP has many adversaries in the country. Many parties have become hostile toward BNP, but BNP considers none of them as enemies. Let me make it clear that you might consider the BNP as an enemy but we don’t.”

Calling for unity among BNP leaders and activists, Mirza Abbas said, “BNP members must remain united. Because there is a lot of talk against BNP—accusations of extortion are being spread. I want to say unequivocally that BNP never condones extortion.”

He urged the head of the current interim government to arrest and sent to jail whoever commits extortion.

“But you lack the courage as your party members and affiliates are the ones doing the extortion and looting,” he added.

The BNP leader also alleged that media is not still free as no newspaper or television are seen criticising the government.

Chaired by BNP’s Cumilla divisional organising secretary Md Selim Bhuiyan and conducted by assistant organising secretary Mustaq Mia, BNP Chairperson’s Advisor Amin-ur-Rashid (Yasin), BNP’s employment affairs secretary and Cumilla South district convener Zakaria Taher (Sumon), Cumilla city BNP President Udbatul Bari (Abu), South district secretary Ashiqur Rahman, and city BNP general secretary Yusuf Molla (Tipu), among others spoke at the programme.​