[🇧🇩] Monitoring Bangladesh's Economy

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Canada China Egypt Finland Germany India Iran Israel Japan Lebanon North Macedonia Pakistan Palestine Qatar Russia Syria Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom United States Yemen
[🇧🇩] Monitoring Bangladesh's Economy
1K
39K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense
For Bangladesh, this means the following:

Fighting Corruption. A credible anti-corruption drive is indispensable. But beyond symbolic gestures, anti-corruption efforts must focus on recovering lost revenues from systemic evasion by powerful business interests. Holding unscrupulous businesspeople accountable for unpaid taxes and illicit wealth transfers could yield a substantial fiscal dividend, potentially more significant than what could be gained by broadening the tax base among low-income earners. Targeted audits, forensic investigations, and enforcement of tax laws on high-net-worth individuals and politically connected firms should be top priorities.

Broadening the Formal Economy. Encouraging formalisation through digital payments, simplified registration, and incentives for SMEs can expand the tax base. Policymakers might consider Vietnam’s experience, which has made notable progress in formalizing its SME sector over the past two decades, beginning with the 2005 Enterprise Law. This progress was achieved through a combination of legal reforms, administrative simplification, financial incentives, and the use of digital tools.

Reforming Tax Expenditures. Rationalising exemptions and incentives that benefit the wealthy disproportionately. Consider replacing blanket corporate incentives with performance-linked tax credits tied to job creation or export diversification. Review and gradually phase out ineffective tax holidays for special economic zones.

Improving Public Spending. Tax compliance will only improve when citizens see visible benefits from their contributions, such as clean water, reliable roads, and quality schools. Consider implementing pilot participatory budgeting in municipalities, enabling citizens to help prioritize local spending on schools, roads, and clinics, as pioneered in Brazil. Additionally, the government might consider launching infrastructure tracking dashboards that show the real-time progress of public projects funded by tax revenue, similar to India’s Gati Shakti portal. Scaling back or canceling mega projects and redirecting funds to health and education could also be beneficial.

Enhancing Transparency. Publish regular tax data, enforcement outcomes, and the use of revenue in public dashboards. Establish an open-access public finance portal that displays tax collections by sector and budget allocations by the ministry, modeled on the US government’s “USAspending.gov.” Establish a public grievance redressal mechanism that allows citizens to report harassment or corruption anonymously, with mandatory follow-up and accountability measures in place.

Conclusion: Bangladesh’s low tax-to-GDP ratio is not the disease—it is a symptom of a deeper malaise. Fixating on this metric without addressing the underlying rot of corruption, elite capture, inequality, and institutional mistrust will lead nowhere. Taxation is not simply a technical policy instrument—it is a moral contract between citizen and state. And right now, that contract is broken.

What Bangladesh needs is not another donor-mandated revenue target, but a comprehensive political and institutional overhaul that restores public confidence, expands the formal economy, and ensures that taxation serves the many, not just the privileged few. Until that happens, the tax-GDP debate will continue to be a distraction from the country’s real problem: a state that taxes without trust and spends without accountability.

Dr MG Quibria is a development economist and former Senior Advisor at the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI). He holds a Ph.D. in economics from Princeton University and has held academic appointments across Asia, North America, and Europe.​
 

Even cut-down Tk 2.26t ADP FY25 miserably misses target
Dev spending hits rock-bottom low at Tk 1.53t

FHM Humayan Kabir
Published :
Jul 24, 2025 00:40
Updated :
Jul 24, 2025 00:40

1753316932155.webp


Development spending in Bangladesh hit rock bottom in the past fiscal year as agencies under the post-uprising government trailed far behind even the pared-down Tk 2.26-trillion Annual Development Programme.

Latest official statistics show the ADP-implementation rate in the fiscal year (FY) 2024-25 recorded a 20-year low, raising concerns about the country's economic development and job generation.

The government ministries and agencies spent only Tk 1.53 trillion or 67.85 per cent of the Tk 2.26-trillion revised ADP outlay, Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED) data showed.

The execution rate was 13-percentage-point lower than the 80.63 per cent in the previous FY2024, according to the official data.

Based on the available data, it was found that the rate of implementation rate of ADP in the last fiscal was the lowest in two decades since FY2005-06. The government had no open-source data before the FY2006.

Analysts attribute this unprecedented slowdown to a confluence of factors, including bureaucratic hurdles, a cautious approach to new project approvals amid global economic uncertainties, and a perceived lack of urgency in project execution by various ministries and implementing agencies.

Officials at the IMED told The Financial Express Wednesday that "the biggest failure" of the health ministry was the key reason for the lowest ADP-implementation rate, as this ministry could spend only 21.74 per cent of its total Tk 56.73 billion worth of outlay in the jus-past financial year.

Some other public agencies, including civil aviation and tourism ministry and the primary and mass education ministry, were on the lowest trajectory implementing lower than even the average 67.85-percent rate in the FY2025, officials said.

The analysts see the interim government's tightfisted fiscal policy as one of the key reasons for the lowest-ever ADP implementation in the last FY.

It was felt that the ADP implementation could even be much lower if the autonomous and semi-autonomous state-run companies had not performed well. The autonomous bodies used an impressive 93.21 per cent of their Tk 101.65-billion ADP outlay.

On the other hand, the government ministries and agencies were sluggish in implementing the project-aid portion in the ADP as they spent 65.53 per cent.

The ministries and agencies, however, spent higher funds from government's internal resources than the foreign-aided funds as it recorded 67.33 per cent in the last FY2025, the IMED data showed.

Among the top 15 ministries, the Health, Civil Aviation and Tourism, and Primary & Mass Education performed worse as their ADP-execution rate was lower than the average 67.85 per cent.

On the other hand, the power division and energy and mineral resources division showed best performance with their 98.10-percent and 90-percent implementation rate.

Economists and analysts point out several key issues contributing to this historic low. Delays in land acquisition, cumbersome procurement processes, and a shortage of skilled manpower for large-scale infrastructure projects have consistently held back progress.

"Furthermore, the government's focus on fiscal consolidation and managing inflation may have inadvertently led to a tighter grip on expenditure, impacting the pace of development activities," says one of them.

The implications of such a low implementation rate are far-reaching. Critical infrastructure projects, essential for boosting economic activity and improving public services, will face further delays.

This directly impacts job creation, private-sector investment, and the overall trajectory of national-development goals. The inability to fully utilise allocated funds also signifies a missed opportunity to stimulate the economy, especially at a time when global headwinds necessitate robust domestic demand.

Economists and development experts urge the government to undertake a comprehensive review of the ADP-implementation framework for future advances.

Senior economist Dr Zahid Hussain told the FE that this interim government faced several movements on the streets almost every week over the last one year which is one of the key reasons for the lower ADP implementation.

"Besides, the cautious public-spending approach and strict reviews of the ongoing projects by this government have also affected higher project-execution rate," he added.

Nevertheless, the failure of some big-budget-holding ministries, including health, education and others, should be analysed in-depth for streamlining their development-budget-spending capacity, the economist suggests.​
 

BEPZA’s contribution to exports rises to 17pc
Staff Correspondent 23 July, 2025, 22:42

1753322277093.webp


The factories at eight export processing zones under Bangladesh Export Processing Zones Authority contributed 17.03 per cent to the national export of a total $48.28 billion in the recently concluded financial year 2024-25.

During FY25, operational enterprises of various EPZs under BEPZA exported goods worth $8.22 billion, which was 16.22 per cent higher than the $7.07 billion exported in FY24, according to a press release.

In FY24, the factory units under BEPZA contributed 15.9 per cent to the total national export of $44.46 billion.

In FY25, the BEPZA factories also created more than 33,000 new employment opportunities.

Moreover, the state agency also signed 33 agreements with new enterprises, which cemented the way for increased investment in the coming days.

Since its inception, BEPZA-administered factories exported goods worth $119 billion to date.

The manufacturing units at eight EPZs exported their goods to more than 120 countries worldwide.

As of June 2025, a total of 533,527 Bangladeshi nationals have been employed in eight EPZs and the BEPZA Economic Zone, which was 500,110 in June 2024, the press release added.

In FY25, enterprises operating within BEPZA’s EPZs and Economic Zone invested $292.77 million in capital machinery, construction materials, and other fixed assets (excluding working capital). However, the figure was lower than the $350.93 million invested in FY24.

In FY25, the BEPZA signed 33 new investment agreements with investors from China, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Ireland, the British Virgin Islands, Singapore, India, the United Arab Emirates, and Bangladeshi companies.

The total proposed investment under these agreements was $497.48 million, with an estimated employment potential of 59,408 Bangladeshi nationals.

These enterprises would produce a wide range of goods, including readymade garments, electronics, agro-based products, footwear, leather goods, packaging materials, tents, wigs, light engineering products, toys, and composite items.

At present, there are 563 industrial units under BEPZA, of which 450 are operational and 113 are under implementation.

Among the operational enterprises, 33 per cent produce readymade garments, 18 per cent garment accessories, and 9 per cent textile products.

The remaining 40 per cent export a wide variety of goods ranging from electronics and medical equipment to furniture and fashion accessories.

Along with the eight operational EPZs across the country and the BEPZA Economic Zone in Mirsarai in Chattogram, the development of two new EPZs in Jashore and Patuakhali is progressing rapidly to attract more investment.​
 
Mirsarai in Chattogram is already online partially but will slowly get to 50% or so by the next 3 years Insha-Allah, so will the two new EPZs in Jashore and Patuakhali in 2027.

However Mirsarai remains the largest EPZ in Asia (35000 acres) and the scope for further FDI placements is very, very wide. Lot's of FDI expected from China especially.

I have very high hopes for Mirsarai. For a small country like ours, this is quite an achievement.
 
I have very high hopes for Mirsarai. For a small country like ours, this is quite an achievement.
Your economy depends on population not the size of the country. Geographically Bangladesh is small but population wise it's the eighth largest country in the world.:)
 

Bangladesh at the crossroads of sustainable progress

Matiur Rahman
Published :
Jul 25, 2025 22:26
Updated :
Jul 25, 2025 22:26

1753489037409.webp


In July 2025, the United Nations released its 'Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025', offering a sobering and urgent assessment of the global effort to meet the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The report reveals that only 35 per cent of the 169 SDG targets are on track or making moderate progress, while nearly half are either stagnating or progressing too slowly, and an alarming 18 per cent are regressing.

Described by UN Secretary-General António Guterres as a "global development emergency," the report calls for unprecedented political will, multilateral action, and investment to avert the unraveling of the SDG framework. For Bangladesh-a country often highlighted as a model of development in the Global South-the report serves not only as a global reckoning but also as a mirror reflecting its complex and uneven journey toward sustainable development.

Bangladesh's progress since adopting the SDGs in 2015 has been both visible and significant. Child mortality rates have declined, girls' access to education has improved, rural electrification has expanded, and innovative social programs-many led by NGOs and supported by development partners-have deepened inclusion.

However, the 2025 SDG report makes clear that global turbulence from climate change and pandemics to economic shocks and geopolitical crises is putting even the most resilient development models under strain. Bangladesh is no exception. The country stands at a critical inflexion point: either accelerate progress through systemic reform and investment, or risk undoing decades of social and economic gains.

The report identifies six "critical transitions" where the SDG agenda must now be concentrated: food systems, energy access, digital connectivity, education, employment and social protection, and climate-biodiversity action. These are not abstract global goals, but rather deeply relevant to the Bangladeshi context. Each sector reveals both the strides already made and the vulnerabilities yet to be addressed.

In the realm of food systems, Bangladesh presents a story of contrasts. On one hand, the country has achieved near self-sufficiency in rice production, bolstered by widespread agricultural mechanisation and rural microfinance. On the other hand, malnutrition remains stubbornly high. According to the report, nearly one in eleven people globally experienced hunger in 2023, while over two billion faced moderate to severe food insecurity.

Bangladesh mirrors this pattern. Despite national food availability, undernutrition persists due to poor dietary diversity, food price volatility, and the fragile status of small-scale producers. These producers-who dominate the agricultural sector-often earn less than $500 annually, lack formal land rights, and have limited access to credit, insurance, and modern farming technologies.

The country's agricultural orientation index remains low relative to its GDP contribution, echoing the global finding that despite record-high public agricultural investment, resources are not translating into equitable or sustainable outcomes. Structural reform in rural agrifood systems, support for women farmers, and investments in value chains and cold storage infrastructure are now urgent.

On energy access, the picture is again mixed. Electrification in Bangladesh has expanded significantly, reaching over 96 per cent of the population. The country has successfully scaled solar home systems in off-grid areas, a notable achievement in South Asia. However, the clean cooking agenda lags far behind. The continued use of biomass and inefficient stoves in rural areas contributes to indoor air pollution, health risks, and deforestation.

The UN report highlights that while access to electricity has improved globally, the transition to affordable, renewable, and clean energy is progressing too slowly. In Bangladesh, the share of renewables in the energy mix is under 5 per cent, and fossil-fuel-based energy-particularly coal and imported LNG-remains dominant.

Energy subsidies are not aligned with long-term sustainability, and green financing mechanisms are still in their early stages of development. To meet SDG 7, Bangladesh must commit to a deeper energy transition through expanded investment in decentralised solar grids, incentives for green entrepreneurship, and policies that prioritise energy justice for low-income and climate-vulnerable communities.

In digital inclusion, Bangladesh has made commendable progress. With the rise of "Digital Bangladesh" as a national vision, internet penetration has surpassed 70 per cent. E-governance, mobile banking, and online education platforms have experienced rapid expansion, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the digital divide remains stark. Rural areas continue to suffer from poor connectivity and limited access to devices.

Women, especially in conservative and low-income households, face barriers to digital access, usage, and literacy. The UN report notes that while global internet usage increased from 40 per cent in 2015 to 68 per cent in 2024, inequalities in digital access persist. In Bangladesh, digital progress risks reproducing pre-existing inequalities unless proactively addressed through targeted policy. Without addressing digital illiteracy, affordability, cyber-security risks, and gender bias, the country will not harness the transformative power of technology for inclusive development.

Education has long been a development stronghold in Bangladesh. The country has achieved near gender parity in school enrollment and has invested significantly in stipend programs and the distribution of textbooks. Yet, the SDG report highlights a growing global concern: education quality is stagnating.

In Bangladesh, the problem is acute. Learning outcomes in reading and numeracy remain low, and dropout rates increase sharply at the secondary level, especially among girls. COVID-19 disrupted learning trajectories, particularly for children from rural and urban low-income backgrounds who lacked access to online learning.

The teacher-student ratio remains sub-optimal, and public investment in secondary and vocational education is insufficient to meet future labour market demands. The education system must now shift its focus from access to quality, investing in teacher training, curriculum modernisation, and school safety, while also prioritising digital literacy and climate education.

Employment and social protection are perhaps the most pressing challenges. The UN report warns that over 800 million people globally remain trapped in extreme poverty, and 3.8 billion are without any form of social protection. In Bangladesh, despite progress in employment generation in the garment and construction sectors, the labour market remains dominated by informality, precarity, and gendered segmentation. Youth unemployment, underemployment, and skill mismatches are growing problems.

Only a small fraction of the workforce is covered by pensions, health insurance, or unemployment benefits. Social protection programmes exist-such as old age allowances, widow pensions, and disability stipends-but they are fragmented, poorly coordinated, and vulnerable to political manipulation. The gender gap in access is significant.

According to the report, globally, only 9.7 per cent of people in low-income countries are covered by social protection. For Bangladesh, expanding the coverage, adequacy, and digital delivery of social protection is essential. This will require integrating national ID systems, mobile payments, and robust grievance redress mechanisms to build trust and reduce leakage.

Climate change and biodiversity loss represent the most critical existential threats to Bangladesh. The country's geographic location makes it one of the most climate-vulnerable nations globally. Cyclones, floods, river erosion, sea-level rise, and salinity intrusion are already displacing thousands of people annually and undermining livelihoods.

The 'SDG Report 2025' Global climate finance remains fragmented and insufficient. Despite pledges, disbursements to countries like Bangladesh are slow, bureaucratic, and conditional. Loss and damage negotiations have yielded some commitments at the international level; however, translating these commitments into tangible support for affected communities in Bangladesh remains pending. SDGs 13 and 15 will remain unattainable without climate justice and scaled-up adaptation finance.

One of the most profound takeaways from the UN report is the data crisis. Monitoring SDG progress depends on reliable, timely, and disaggregated data. Yet, as the report notes, statistical systems in many countries remain underfunded and fragmented. The abrupt termination of the USAID-supported Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in early 2025 exposes the fragility of global data systems.

For Bangladesh, this means losing key data on family planning, child nutrition, gender-based violence, and slum populations-data that inform national budgeting, policy design, and international benchmarking. Without a national investment in data sovereignty-through stronger statistical institutions, interoperable data platforms, and partnerships with academia and civil society-Bangladesh will be flying blind into the final years of the SDGs.

Institutionally, the governance landscape is increasingly recognised as a key determinant of SDG delivery. SDG 16-on peace, justice, and strong institutions-remains one of the least funded and least prioritised goals, globally and in Bangladesh. Yet its relevance is paramount. Transparent public financial management, inclusive planning, judicial independence, press freedom, and civic space are all necessary to ensure that development is democratic and accountable.

The SDG report calls for "urgent multilateralism"-a new social contract that places equity and participation at the heart of development. For Bangladesh, this means investing in local government capacity, opening political space for youth and civil society, and strengthening public service delivery mechanisms.

As the world moves toward 2030, the message from the United Nations is clear: the SDG framework remains within reach, but only if action is taken decisively and immediately. The final five years to 2030 are not merely a countdown-they are a choice. Bangladesh can choose to accelerate toward justice, resilience, and sustainability. Or, it can remain trapped in a cycle of incrementalism and vulnerability. The future is still unwritten-but time is running out.

Dr Matiur Rahman is a researcher and development professional.​
 

S&P affirmed ‘B+/B’ ratings for Bangladesh

FE ONLINE REPORT
Published :
Jul 25, 2025 15:43
Updated :
Jul 25, 2025 15:44

1753489225776.webp


The global rating agency ---S&P Global Ratings ---affirmed Bangladesh’s credit rating at B+/B, citing mainly recent improvement in its official foreign exchange reserve.

It also said Bangladesh’s outlook is stable.

“We affirmed our long-term sovereign credit ratings on Bangladesh at B+ and our short ratings at B. The outlook is stable,” said S&P on Friday.

It said macroeconomic polices enacted over the past 18 months – such as transitioning opt a more flexible exchange rate regime, allowing local currency Taka to depreciate and tightening the monetary policy – are helping to build foreign exchange liquidity.

But it said that the country faces heightened trade risk from relatively high US tariffs.

It also said that mooted elections in the first half of 2026 are likely to be a critical pivot point for more lasting political stability following the abrupt collapse of the Sheikh Hasina government in July 2024.​
 

No significant shift in non-RMG export earnings
Saddam Hossain 25 July, 2025, 22:49

1753493566128.webp

Export of non-RMG products remained almost static over the past several years, indicating the country’s overreliance on RMG.

According to the Export Promotion Bureau, non-RMG sectors have accounted for only 17 per cent to 18 per cent of Bangladesh’s total export earnings for the past several years.

Exporters stated that insufficient and non-uniform policy support, economic challenges in buyer countries, and a lack of proper diversification continued dependence on RMG export.

In the financial year 2024-25, Bangladesh shipped export items worth $48.28 billion to its global destinations, where the earnings from RMG were $39.35 billion or about 81.49 per cent, meaning the share of non-RMG items only 18.51 per cent.

The major non-RMG items, including leather and leather goods, jute and jute goods, agricultural products, home textiles, and engineering products, generated $1.14 billion, $820.16 million, $988.62 million, $871.57 million, and $535.56 million respectively.

Apart from RMG items, only leather was able to reach the milestone of $1 billion, according to the EPB data.

‘Due to a lack of governmental policy support, the leather sector had been unable to break out of the $1 billion cycle for decades,’ said Md Nasir Khan, vice-president of the Leather Goods and Footwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association of Bangladesh.

Speaking to New Age, he also stated that Bangladesh lacks a unified policy and incentive facilities for all export-oriented sectors.New Age specials

‘Despite having domestic supply of raw materials and high-quality products, leather sector is lagging behind years after years,’ he added.

He also stated that the leather sector has the capacity to earn $10 billion, as it can add value of up to 90 per cent, thanks to its raw materials. However, the government destroyed this opportunity by transferring the industry to Savar without proper establishment and the required CETP.

According to the EPB data, the leather and leather goods sector earned $797.7 million in FY20, $1.17 billion in FY23, and $1.14 billion in FY25, indicating that the industry was unable to break the $1 billion cycle.

The jute and jute goods sector, once the country’s largest export earner, has experienced negative growth for a prolonged period.

In FY20, the sector earned $882.35 million, $911.51 million in FY23, and $820.16 million in FY25.

Speaking to New Age, KS Alam Babul, chairman of the Bangladesh Jute Goods Exporters Association, stated that the anti-dumping duty imposed by India on Bangladeshi jute goods has caused a setback.New Age specials

‘Some major buyers like Sudan, Syria and Iran are addressing either war situation or economic turmoil and sanctions, which impacted their imports,’ he added.

Moreover, they couldn’t accept large orders as all the government jute mills were closed, he added, saying that the private jute mills don’t have the capacity for bulk production.

‘We urged the government several times about reopening the jute mills under BJMC. However, we think an elected government could take the initiatives,’ he added.

Meanwhile, Farhad Ahmed Akand, chairman of the Bangladesh Jute Association, said that due to high time and cost consumption, farmers have lost interest in jute farming.

‘Along with commerce ministry, we are running a project through farmers so that they can produce jute in less time by using less water and space,’ he added.

They also stated that, due to the low price of fibre at the growers› level and the emergence of plastic products as an alternative, jute exports were impacted, along with the slashing of incentives on jute goods.

The agricultural products earned $862.06 million in FY20, $827.10 million in FY23, and $988.62 million in FY25.

An official of Alin Foods Exports Ltd. said that the government›s incentive cut, higher import costs of agri-inputs and other ingredients, impacted the export.

For instance, the rate of cash incentive for the sector has been reduced to 10 per cent from 20 per cent, he added.

Engineering products, another promising sector, has earned $529 million in FY20, $495 million in FY23, and $535.56 million in FY25.

Abdur Razzaque, president of the angladesh Engineering Industry Owners’ Association, told earlier that they need a dedicated industrial park or zones to establish compliant and global standard factory units to compete with international competitors so that they could tap $7 trillion global market of light engineering.

He also demanded that the policy be supported by removing tax and VAT-related issues.

Talking to New Age, M Masrur Reaz, chairman of the Policy Exchange Bangladesh, said that the country didn’t utilise its capacity and potential on non-RMG products.New Age specials

‘For leather sector, the authority didn’t strengthen the seamless connections among different value chains like rawhide collecting, processing, finishing and backward linkage,’ he added.

He also stated that a significant number of companies in the sector lacked standard certificates, such as LWG, which deterred foreign buyers from importing.

‘Most of our sectors beside RMG couldn’t achieve the proper efficiency of the global competitiveness. We also don’t have integrated planning, especially on infrastructure, finance, and skill,’ he added.

Bangladesh hasn’t witnessed sufficient FDI in emerging sectors besides the RMG, and these emerging sectors also have limitations in areas like global competitiveness, skills, and efficiencies. He urged the government to work for product diversification.

The exporters said that sometimes it seemed that policymakers didn’t want other sectors to export more, as it didn’t receive sufficient policy support.

To diversify products, the government must remove the discrimination between the RMG sector and all other export-oriented sectors, they added.​
 

Latest Posts

Back