[🇧🇩] Political Activities of Awami League after Hasina's Regime Fall

[Saif]

Date Occurred: Nov 11, 2024

‘Secret meeting’: 15 AL-affiliated UP members held at Cox’s Bazar hotel

A Cox's Bazar court yesterday sent 15 local union parishad members to jail after they were arrested around midnight from a programme organised at a hotel in the beach town's Kolatoli area.

According to the police, initially, 18 UP members were detained when a large group of them were holding a meeting at a hall room on the fifth floor of the Uni Resort Friday night.

Police later arrested 15 of them for "suspicious activities" under Section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Confirming the matter, Jasim Uddin, additional superintendent of police, said, "If specific allegations are found against them, further legal action will be taken accordingly."

When they were produced before Cox's Bazar Senior Judicial Magistrate's Court yesterday afternoon, they were ordered to be sent to jail, said Md Golam Jilani, court inspector.

The UP members who have been sent to jail are local Awami League leaders.

They are Azim Miya, 35, Md Kayes, 42, and Mohammad Ali, 55, of Kauwarkhop; Kamal Hossain, 37, of Garjoniya; Jasim Uddin, 48, and Rubel Jaldas, 33, of Saharbil; Junaid Ahmad, 40, and Irfanur Rahman, 40, of Paschim Bara Bheola; Kafil Uddin Md Jahangir, 46, of Badarkhali; Belal Uddin, 40, and Shafiqur Rahman, 42, of Bamo Bilchari; Abul Kalam, 55, of Konakhali; Nazrul Islam, 35, of Kakhara; Shah Alam, 39, of Teknaf Sadar; and Mohammad Miah, 54, of Chowfaldandi.

According to the meeting participants, the gathering titled the "Role of Root-Level Public Representatives in State Reform, Democracy, and Local Development" was organised by the Bangladesh Union Members' Organisation (Cox's Bazar branch).

Around 70 representatives were attending the meeting when police, along with members of Anti-Discrimination Student Movement, stormed into the hall room around 9:00pm and detained 18 of the participants around 12:00am, they added

"The operation was based on information that Awami League-backed UP members were conducting a clandestine meeting. We are now checking whether any of the arresting are facing any criminal charges," said Cox's Bazar Sadar Model Police Station Officer-in-Charge (OC) Faizul Azim.

Zahir Ahmed, member of Teknaf Sadar Union Parishad, who was detained and later released, denied the allegation of holding a clandestine meeting, saying, "If it was supposed to be a secret, we wouldn't organise such a large gathering at a roadside hotel. We're being harassed."

Another attendee, Mohammad Salim from Moheshkhali, who was not picked up, said, "Representatives of all political affiliations were present. I strongly condemn the arrests of our colleagues."​

 

[Saif]

‘গোপন বৈঠকের’ খবরে পুলিশ ও বৈষম্যবিরোধী ছাত্রদের তল্লাশি, ১৮ ইউপি সদস্য আটক

 

[Saif]

Anatomy of AL’s complaint to ICC

THE name ‘Bangladesh’ is not stranger to the International Criminal Court. It was one of the earliest signatories to the ICC Rome Statute and ratified the same on March 23, 2010. Publicly available information shows that the ICC received at least four communications containing complaints...

www.newagebd.net

Anatomy of AL’s complaint to ICC
Quazi Omar Foysal 14 November, 2024, 00:00

International Criminal Court. | Human Rights Watch

THE name ‘Bangladesh’ is not stranger to the International Criminal Court. It was one of the earliest signatories to the ICC Rome Statute and ratified the same on March 23, 2010. Publicly available information shows that the ICC received at least four communications containing complaints (institutionally known as Article 15 Communications or Communications) related to the recently ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina and her associates, dated June 29, 2013, February 4, 2014, August 1, 2024, and October 28, 2024, respectively.

The ICC re-emerged in Bangladeshi public discourse on November 8, 2024. This time, however, the communication was filed by an Awami League leader against the leadership of the incumbent interim government and the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement. While this communication may be politically motivated, its legal prospects merit careful examination under the law and practice of the ICC.

Before approaching the anatomy of the communication in question, it is pertinent to shed some light on its contents. Filed under Article 15 of the Rome Statute, this communication alleges that all advisers of the current interim government, including chief adviser professor Muhammad Yunus, as well as certain student leaders of the July uprising, are responsible for alleged crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity against Awami League supporters, minority community members, and police forces in Augusy 5–8. The communication reportedly includes around 800 pages of documentary evidence. Although no public documents are available for this communication, the communicator’s press release provides sufficient background to understand its legal prospects.

To begin with, this type of communication is intended to provide the ICC prosecutor with information on crimes committed within the Court’s jurisdiction. The ICC may consider investigating and prosecuting certain crimes in three ways under the Rome Statute: referral by an ICC member state, referral by the UN Security Council, and initiatives of the ICC prosecutor. In respect of the ICC prosecutor, Article 15 of the Rome Statute empowers him to initiate a preliminary examination based on information available to him.

As per the OTP’s Policy Paper on Preliminary Examinations 2013 (2013 Policy Paper), the prosecutor may receive information from ‘individuals or groups, states, intergovernmental or non-governmental organisations, or other reliable sources.’ In fact, the ICC has a dedicated portal to receive such communications. While many Article 15 communications have been positively considered by the prosecutor, this process does not guarantee any action. Since anyone can submit a communication regardless of their connection to the alleged crime or the credibility of the claims, it is safe to assume that many such communications become unsuccessful as per the ICC standards.

At this point, the prospect of this communication warrants some scrutiny. The OTP, after receiving a communication, follows a four-stage procedure to determine its prospects as per the 2013 policy paper. First, the OTP assesses and verifies information on alleged crimes to determine if they fall within the ICC’s jurisdiction. Second, it conducts a detailed assessment to confirm the jurisdiction of the Court over the alleged crimes and identify potential cases, focusing on large-scale or systematic offences. Third, it validates if potential cases are serious enough and not being addressed by national courts, while also collecting more information on the crimes. Fourth, the OTP assesses whether starting an investigation serves the interests of justice.

If the prosecutor determines there is sufficient basis for a crime within the court’s jurisdiction and concludes that the proceeding meets the gravity of the offence and the interests of victims, he may initiate a preliminary examination. At this point, the prosecutor cannot automatically initiate a full-fledged investigation. Upon finding sufficient evidence through the preliminary examination, he must seek authorisation from the Pre-Trial Chamber of the ICC, which may either approve or reject the request for investigation. If the prosecutor is unconvinced by an Article 15 Communication, he may choose not to proceed at any point of the four-stage procedure.

It is evident that the ICC takes considerable time before deciding to invest its time and resources in a particular situation. While some may view this Article 15 Communication as a promising start, there is little likelihood that it will pass all four stages outlined in the 2013 Policy Paper. Three areas invite particular attention. Three specific issues merit attention.

First, the Article 15 Communication may struggle to meet the subject matter jurisdiction of the Court, i.e., crimes under its jurisdiction. Though there is credible evidence of human rights violations after August 5, it is highly contested whether those events reached the threshold of crimes against humanity, let alone genocide. This raises questions about the adequacy of the evidence provided with the Communication to establish the contextual elements of these crimes and meet the required thresholds of the Rome Statute.

Given the plethora of disinformation and misinformation regarding the events in August 5–8, the OTP will face significant challenges in verifying the accuracy of the information. However, the ICC is already aware of the limitations associated with digital evidence. It is expected that the OTP will objectively assess and corroborate the submitted evidence with third-party sources.

Second, the Article 15 Communication may face additional difficulties in establishing the ICC’s personal jurisdiction requirements. The names listed in the complaint are surprising, especially given that it alleges the interim government advisers’ responsibility for crimes that occurred prior to their appointments. Similar concerns apply to the ADSM leadership. This communication may presumably encounter insurmountable challenges in providing sufficient evidence to establish individual responsibility for these alleged crimes under the Rome Statute.

On another note, naming individuals in the communication is not an end in itself. The OTP first investigates the situation and subsequently, upon receiving a certain standard of evidence, moves to cases against specific individuals. Thus, naming the individuals in this communication does not serve any immediate legal purpose. It may be that this naming holds no significance beyond the press release.

Third, this communication will likely confront admissibility issues. Given that the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh is investigating crimes committed on or before August 5, the OTP will certainly address the complementarity principle here. Moreover, it will also address the gravity of the alleged crimes, which is very high in the Rome Statute. The issue of admissibility of evidence will re-emerge in this context. Furthermore, the OTP will assess whether this communication serves the interests of justice or constitutes an abuse of process. In summary, this communication is unlikely to progress beyond the initial stages of the four-stage procedure. It is not an overstatement to say that this communication may never see the light of day.

Generally, Article 15 communications are kept confidential, with the ICC providing safeguards to ensure the privacy of the communicators and the safety of communicators. In this instance, however, the communicators have made the complaint public. Given the wiry legal prospects of this communication and the Awami League’s call for nationwide demonstrations post-US presidential election, this communication seems politically motivated, likely intended to rally supporters rather than genuinely pursue justice. To sum up, this communication may stand as yet another example of the ICC process being utilised for political purposes.

Quazi Omar Foysal is an international law expert, working at American International University-Bangladesh.​

 

[Saif]

Moral taint and the Awami League

THERE is little or no doubt that the recently ousted Awami League and its members established a horrific dictatorship in Bangladesh. The Awami League, as a party, and its leaders and workers, as individuals, were steeped in corruption and appeared as ruthless adversaries to their opponents. It...

www.newagebd.net

Moral taint and the Awami League
Mostofa Nazmul Mansur 17 November, 2024, 00:00

THERE is little or no doubt that the recently ousted Awami League and its members established a horrific dictatorship in Bangladesh. The Awami League, as a party, and its leaders and workers, as individuals, were steeped in corruption and appeared as ruthless adversaries to their opponents. It is difficult to overlook that this party and its leaders and workers looted and smuggled billions of dollars abroad and engaged in brutal and inhumane treatment, including enforced disappearances and killings of opposition party leaders and activists. In these acts, they employed government bureaucrats and the state police force. From Begum Khaleda Zia, the most prominent opposition leader, to grassroots activists, all became victims of the atrocities and inhumanity perpetrated by this party and its members. Thus, neither the party nor its leaders and workers can evade legal punishment or moral responsibility. Ensuring legal consequences for the party and its leaders and workers, as well as moral condemnation, is among the responsibilities of a civilised society.

Yet, were there not leaders and workers in this party who refrained from direct participation in corruption or atrocities and only wished to engage in politics? Although they may be few in number, such individuals likely did and still do exist. Should we refer to them as ‘good Awami Leaguers’ in contrast to ‘bad Awami Leaguers’? Undoubtedly, these so-called ‘good Awami Leaguers’ should receive legal protection, as they committed no crimes by law. But how should we view them from a moral perspective? What should be the nature of our social relationships with them? Should they be treated similarly to other good citizens, both ethically and socially? These questions have become especially pertinent in post-August 5 Bangladesh.

In determining the nature of our moral and social relationships with these so-called ‘good Awami Leaguers’ in post-August 5 Bangladesh, the philosophical concept of ‘moral taint’ becomes highly relevant. Philosophers like Thomas Nagel, Hannah Arendt, and Karl Jaspers have introduced the notion of moral taint in philosophy. Moral taint can be defined as a condition in which an individual or a group is morally compromised due to indirect involvement with, proximity to, or association with immoral actions, systems, or individuals — even if they are not directly responsible for those wrongs. This concept suggests that one’s moral character or standing can be affected by associations that carry ethical implications. Moral taint is not about direct accountability but rather about an ethical contamination or stain that arises from being connected to wrongs in ways that implicate moral responsibility.

One’s morality can be tainted in various ways: (1) by being a member of an organisation that commits moral crimes; (2) by inheriting the moral burden of historical injustices (like slavery or colonialism); or (3) by being close to wrongdoings (proximity to wrongdoing). For example, an individual’s morality may be tainted by being part of a system, structure, organisation, or corporation that contributes to harm, even if the individual does not actively engage in harmful acts. Similarly, descendants of those who committed acts of slavery or colonialism may feel a sense of moral taint from their ancestors’ actions, despite their lack of direct participation. Additionally, simply being close to wrongdoing may invoke moral taint; for instance, witnessing harm and doing nothing, or inadvertently aiding another’s wrongdoing (such as unintentionally supplying resources that are misused), can give rise to a sense of moral taint.

From this perspective, it is clear that one’s morality may be tainted in at least three ways: (1) by being a member of an organisation that commits moral crimes, (2) by inheriting the moral burden of ancestors, and (3) by proximity to wrongdoings without resisting them. In this light, it appears that at least two of the conditions above — namely, conditions (1) and (3) — apply even to the so-called ‘good Awami Leaguers.’ Therefore, their morality too has been tainted. As such, they cannot claim to be regarded in the same way as other good citizens of Bangladesh as long as their morality remains tainted due to their affiliation with the Awami League.

Is there a way for them to be absolved of this taint? Certainly, there is. However, they must first acknowledge the crimes committed by the Awami League and its leaders and workers. They must recognise that the Awami League’s brutal and corrupt actions are punishable offences and that justice must be served for these crimes. Furthermore, they must express shame and remorse for being members of a party that committed such crimes and for being close to these wrongdoings without resisting them. They must seek forgiveness. By doing so, these so-called ‘good Awami Leaguers’ can transcend their tainted morality and elevate themselves to the status of other good citizens in the state. In short, the Awami League and the ‘bad Awami Leaguers’ must face punishment. If the so-called ‘good Awami Leaguers’ wish to be regarded as ordinary good citizens in society, they must acknowledge the crimes of their party and its leaders and workers, express shame and remorse, and seek forgiveness. In post-August 5 Bangladesh, there is no other alternative.

Finally, the concept of moral taint underscores the enduring impact of collective actions on individual morality, particularly in politically charged environments. In the case of Bangladesh’s post-August 5 reality, the onus lies not only on the perpetrators of wrongdoing but also on those who, by association, may carry a shadow of complicity. For ‘good Awami Leaguers,’ this moment calls for a deep moral reckoning, wherein they recognise the harm perpetuated by their organisation and seek genuine absolution through acknowledgement, remorse, and a commitment to ethical standards. Only by navigating this process of reflection and reform can individuals disentangle themselves from the past’s moral burdens and help foster a society grounded in justice, integrity, and unity. This journey is essential, not just for individual moral redemption but for the collective healing and progress of Bangladesh.

Dr Mostofa Nazmul Mansur is a professor of philosophy at Jahangirnagar University.​

 

[Saif]

Post-Hasina Bangladesh: realigning parties?

CONFIGURATIONS of political parties in Bangladesh now carry multiple drifts — they are still inchoate after a long hiatus under an authoritarian stretch of 15 plus years. But the parties got a new lease of life since a populist revolt ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina’s repressive regime. Now...

www.newagebd.net

Post-Hasina Bangladesh: realigning parties?
M Rashiduzzaman 17 November, 2024, 00:00

Anti-government protesters display the national flag as they storm the residence of prime minister Sheikh Hasina deposed on August 5. | Agence France-Presse/KM Asad

CONFIGURATIONS of political parties in Bangladesh now carry multiple drifts — they are still inchoate after a long hiatus under an authoritarian stretch of 15 plus years. But the parties got a new lease of life since a populist revolt ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina’s repressive regime. Now, they are optimistic, alive and thrusting. The expected contestants are mobilising resources for the future electoral race. Bangladeshis love politics even though their success in institution-building fell short of expectations on multiple occasions. Historically, parties ‘formed’ with a great ease in colonial and post-colonial Bengal; then, bulk of the outfits did not grow for long. Factional and personal rivalries are still so strong in Bengali political culture. Single-party domination, personalistic hegemony and the familiar dynastic claims characterised the rise and fall of parties in the past.

Among the squirming parties in the post-Hasina Bangladesh, I sense an ideological jolt. The Awami League-centric secular-liberal nationalism, with Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as the ‘jatir pita’ has lost its pitch since the July-August tectonic discontent. A fresh sense of patriotism is, however, yet to come out lucidly. It is even short of catchy slogans and rhetoric to attract public attention. Anti-Indian and anti-Awami League postures are the twins in the new mood in Bangladesh, which, of course, have their challengers — both internal and external. India is important to Bangladesh; on the other side, Bangladesh is too crucial for Indian security in the northeastern states. So, New Delhi might try to reinstate Hasina or her Awami League allies back in Bangladesh. Nostalgia for the bygone Hasina regime among her surviving beneficiaries is still amongst the Awami League leftovers, anxious to return to power by hook or by crook. The troubled Awami League will really have its own existential crisis if a band of its leaders, not directly associated with Hasina’s tyrannical regime, would jettison the old guards — the Mujib family — and recycle themselves as the new-fangled Awami League. Neither the caretaker regime nor the Bangladesh Nationalist party or Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami is ruling out such possibilities. The Awami League gained its historic thrust in 1971, which, of course, went adrift after the 1975 violent coup. Much later, it regained vigorously first since the 1996 election victory and then more solidly after the 2008 electoral triumph. Has the one-time mighty Awami League lost its previous momentum? Hasina’s prolonged autocracy destroyed a large and established party from within itself. Neither Mujib nor Hasina fully trusted the party although both used the party to climb the ladder of power. Mujib stabbed the party in the back by creating the BKSAL single-party system and Hasina preferred to rule by creating an oligarchy of corrupt businesspeople, crony politicians, sycophants, politicians, politicised bureaucrats, the police and henchmen.

Will post-Hasina Bangladesh wipe out the Mujib-Hasina brand of politics? In that case, the Awami League might lose its deceptive Indian patronage. India is the dominant power in the region and the regional actors are careful in dealing with the neighbourhood juggernaut. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party, now buoyant about its impending return to power, would avoid any direct confrontation with the next-door giant. Even the Jamaat-e-Islami has sent ‘soft’ messages to India. None of the leaders of those two major parties aggressively demanded the Awami League’s ban. Rumours floated that the Awami League leadership would change and it was willing to connect with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party for certain areas of common concerns. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party wanted legal actions and punishment for Hasina and her associates for their tyrannical intransigence and wanton deaths and destruction in July–August. So far, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party did not strongly demand the Awami League’s ban, but the leaders of the unbridled civil unrest denounced the Awami League as a fascist outfit that did not deserve a slot in a democracy.

A disconnect exists between the majority Bangladeshi parties and the student leaders who steered the furious anti-Hasina crusade. They want a radical change with a ‘revolutionary’ zeal by upending the entire post-1971 political narrative, including its historiography and the sense of identity. They condemn the Awami League’s exclusionary path and its alleged collusion with New Delhi to turn Bangladesh into a ‘vassal state’ of India. The time-worn Bangladeshi consensus, so long defined by the Awami League-delineated post-1971 chetana that deified the late Sheikh Mujib and sustained Sheikh Hasina’s prolonged tyranny is all but shattered since the July-August revolt. The conventional parties, including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, the Jamaat and the lessor parties, would prefer to return to power soon by a majoritarian party rule or by sharing power by a coalition of like-minded parties. The smaller parties, however, want a proportional representation, which ordinarily gives better power-sharing opportunities to minor parties. The protest leaders and the smaller parties also want the proportional representation as a tool to fight against the single-party hegemony in Bangladesh. But the larger parties, both the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Awami League, are reluctant to give up the existing majority-style voting system. If Bangladesh switches to a proportional representation, the world of political parties will change substantially.

The student leaders of the July-August upheavals opposed the main parties’ dynastic leadership, which turned them against both the ousted Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. Both the parties carry the family names at their highest echelon. The simmering encounter between the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the protest leaders was clear recently when the Bangladesh Nationalist Party turned down the student leaders’ demand for the Bangladesh president’s immediate resignation. Senior BNP leaders are trying to establish the party’s relevance to post-Hasina Bangladesh politics. BNP front runners are active in the media. Out of her contrived jail sentence, Khaleda Zia is looking for a better health care abroad and Tareque Zia, the BNP’s president-in-charge, is more visible on social media. More prospective candidates are lobbying for BNP tickets in the next election, for which no date came out so far.

Will the samanwaykari (coordinating) student leaders float a party, as the rumour goes on? Neither the student campaigners nor Mohammad Yunus’s cabinet, so far, produced a clear political vision about their future. Spectacular political changes resulted from the student-led protests in the bygone. I remember the massive events that goaded East Pakistan chief minister Abu Hossain Sarker’s government to resign in 1956. it was the Awami League leader Ataur Rahman Khan who headed the succeeding government. Now, the caretaker authority is running the administration until the next election.

There was a time when the digits of ‘1971’ carried the ‘short-handed’ message for pruning Jamaat out of politics, as I read this in the past. Now, Jamaat’s greatest achievement is that the party, as a movement, could survive undercover, when necessary, and still explode as a big blow to its political adversaries. Jamaat’s student front, the Shibir, has a place in the student samanway committee that has worked with Dr Yunus. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party has maintained its unity during its trying times. And now, it is the largest party in Bangladesh with bright electoral prospects ahead. No longer, dependent on the Bangladesh Nationalist Party’s mercy, Jamaat has moved from the periphery to the centre of Bangladesh politics. Islamic politics is not the monopoly of Jamaat although it is the largest party upholding political Islam in Bangladesh. A few can predict now if Jamaat will go to the poll alone or as a coalition of the Islamic parties. Smaller parties also hope for its share in the Bangladeshi arena of politics. The evolving configuration of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jamaat will substantively impact the future Bangladeshi party politics.

What happened earlier this year ripped through the Bangladeshi psyche while people feel empowered by the populist stump that ejected the Hasina rule. That colossal uprising worked like a referendum against Hasina’s unbending authoritarianism and crimes against humanity. But the main discourse of the revolt is yet to appear as a coherent institutional expression. Which of the established parties would embrace the July-August protest’s counter-narrative? The perceived relief is that the Awami League’s archaic single-party ascendency is not on its brutal rampage in Bangladesh now. And the rhetorical temperature against the Jamaat and the old fear-mongering about Islamic terrorism have significantly subsided. Bangladeshis, however, still acknowledge that parties are the essential vehicles for the parliamentary democracy that they cherish so much. The lingering polarisation, periodic lawlessness, disagreements and discontent over constitutional and institutional reforms and the absence of a road map for the next election are creating a chasm between the parties and the interim regime. The fear of internal instability and external interference on different pretexts wrestles a necessary consensus before the return of an elected and stable governance.

M Rashiduzzaman, a retired academic in the United States, occasionally writes on Bangladesh politics and history. Parts of this essay draw from his forthcoming ‘Parties and Politics in East Pakistan 1947-1971: The Political Inheritances of Bangladesh’, Peter Lang, 2024.​

 

[Saif]

Leaked calls of Hasina: a socio-political analysis

Former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's leaked phone conversations, reportedly broadcast from her location in India, have become a sensation among the Bangladeshi people and reveal the extent of her influence over the Awami League loyalists in Bangladesh. During those calls, she allegedly mobilises h

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Leaked calls of Hasina: a socio-political analysis
Serajul I Bhuiyan
Published :
Nov 19, 2024 23:01
Updated :
Nov 19, 2024 23:01

Protesters at a gathering in Dhaka during the anti-discrimination movement in July —FE File Photo

Former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's leaked phone conversations, reportedly broadcast from her location in India, have become a sensation among the Bangladeshi people and reveal the extent of her influence over the Awami League loyalists in Bangladesh. During those calls, she allegedly mobilises her followers to resist and disrupt the interim government of Dr Muhammad Yunus. But instead of dividing or anarchising, these discussions have apparently mobilised that very spirit of resistance which ended up toppling her government. Political and social theories are guidelines toward understanding both Hasina's strategies and how those strategies have unexpectedly influenced Bangladeshi society.

THE PERSISTENCE OF CONSPIRACY NARRATIVES: One critical dimension of the phone calls of Hasina is an insistence on highlighting that the fall was out of international conspiracies and not an organic people's uprising. Several theories of social and cognitive psychology, particularly cognitive dissonance, explain why she clings on to this narrative. Cognitive dissonance occurs when individuals encounter information that is inconsistent with their self-concept or beliefs. To Hasina and her allies, recognising the movement as a legitimate cry for justice and democracy could well demolish their pretensions of moral and political authority. The plot framing allowed Hasina to skirt corruption, excesses of power, and episodes of authoritarianism that marked her regime. But this sounds like a poorly told story. Rather than convincing the people, her denial of reality seems to be feeding the revolutionary fervour. Each interview that confirms her in denial serves just to underline how removed she is from the woes of common Bangladeshis and increases the determination of those who saw her government go. The conspiracy theories are for many a fair reminder of how her administration treated the will of the people as something with no value, and thoroughly entrenched the need for systemic change.

THE THEORY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE: What is highly relevant here is the theory by Michel Foucault, who argued that power does not lie with the state alone but it is diffused through networks and enacted through social structure and associations. According to Foucault, power and resistance are interdependent, and the former generates a definite counter-reaction or resistance related to each application of power. Hasina's attempt, by exile, to continue wielding influence within grassroots networks of the AL was diffuse power. Rather than strengthening her position, it has led only to intensified resistance from below. Her calls for disruption are seen not as a rallying cry but as evidence of her desperation, illustrating Foucault's idea that when power attempts to dominate, it often spurs counter-movements. The protests and students' movement that have continued to expand in response to Hasina's phone calls lend credence to a fact that people resist attempts to regulate them through some form of authoritarian legerdemain. People in Bangladesh, particularly those amongst the youth, translate this resistance into collective actions that aptly depict the Foucauldian view that power is fluid and can be grasped by those who are prepared to challenge an entrenched order. In this way, this public empowerment shows that what little control Hasina attempts to exert through remote influence has only been met with equal forbearance by a pent-up desire for justice, one which disrupts her efforts at reinstating authority.

THEORY OF HEGEMONY AND COUNTER-HEGEMONY: Antonio Gramsci's theories on hegemony and counter-hegemony offer an insight from an angle at which acting by Hasina is conserving opposition forces inadvertently. Gramsci argued that ruling elites maintain power not just through the threat of violence but through cultural and ideological influence, establishing a "hegemony" that legitimates the authority of the rulers. More than a decade into Hasina's rule, that hegemony came from placing party loyalists in public institutions and dominance over the media, judiciary, and police. But in July-August, the revolution finally broke that hegemony, and her telephone calls only enforce the feeling that her leadership is out of step with the reality of the people's demands. The counter-hegemony in Bangladesh-a combination of students, civil society, and various opposition groups-seized this moment in order to contest hegemonic ideology. Hasina's remote instructions to the local leaders are seen as the last desperate acts of a regime losing its grip on both power and an opportunity for the opposition to consolidate and deepen its influence. Public reaction to Hasina's calls shows that people no longer buy into the hegemonistic narratives her party espouses-a societal values shift that prizes accountability and justice above authoritarian control.

THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE: Social media has played an indispensable role in amplifying the phone calls of Hasina to a wide audience and shaping public discourse. Agenda-setting theory, which states that media influence decides the "salience of issues on the public agenda," leads toward explanations of even how these leaked conversations become the points of focus for discussion and action. Every word transmitted over the digital media exposed her to accusations of countering an ordinary citizen's wish, while strongly reinforcing the narratives of corruption and authoritarianism in AL that would lead to her fall. Moreover, young people resorted to social media to plan demonstrations, share information, and retighten their solidarity in confrontation with Hasina's maneuvers. Hasina's calls-Clifford Parker-Hasina's appeals-to destabilize the interim government have instead become rallying cries for the revolution, as with each new leak a reiteration was provided through social media to the public of the demand for meaningful reform. In these ways, social media has provided a site of digital contention in which Hasina's attempts at influence are met with overwhelming public resistance, a function of agenda-setting in shaping the political landscape.

THEORY OF CHARISMATIC AUTHORITY: Max Weber's concept on charismatic authority can come in handy in assessing Hasina's long-lasting influence upon AL members. In charismatic authority, the basis is devotion to an individual with perceived exceptional qualities, often depending upon emotional allegiance without rational or legal forms of power. Hasina's leadership was built on this charisma for years, with her status as part of Bangladesh's history fostering loyalty in the ranks. This loyalty allowed her to mobilize AL members even in exile. However, Weber noted that charismatic authority is inherently unstable, especially once the leader is post facto incapable of delivering tangible returns to their followers. Her present remote leadership is likely to further undermine her authority as the members of AL suffer from the consequences of following dictates that run counter to their interests in Bangladesh. The backlash from the people and the less-than-effective results of her instructions are likely to undermine the loyalty of grassroots leaders of AL. As Hasina's commands continue not to yield the wished-for result, her authority might shift from charismatic to increasingly tenuous, forcing her followers into reevaluation of loyalty.

DURKHEIM'S COLLECTIVE CONSCIENCE: Émile Durkheim's concept of the collective conscience-that is, the shared values, norms, and beliefs which unite a society-is alive and well in the student-led resistance against Hasina's calls. The July-August uprising created a strong, collective conscience of justice, transparency, and democratic reform. The incendiary instructions of Hasina, which aimed at scarring this collective ethos, only managed to reinforce unity among students and citizens alike in a paradoxical way: They are perceived as threats to the integrity of the struggle, and hence it is a rallying point for solidarity, building cohesion. In effect, Hasina has allowed the complete disregard of collective conscience and heightened the resolve of the students and the public-at-large that facilitated the ouster of her government. Her telephone calls remind them of what the public is against, while the attempts to pass reform by the interim government remind them of what the public is for. Durkheim's theory underlines that no powerful attempt can defeat a society with a unified collective conscience, especially if those attempts are perceived as threats to the ideals they harbour together.

UNINTENDED STRENGTHENING OF PEOPLE'S POWER: Sheikh Hasina's unremitting contacts with local AL leaders from abroad are designed to demoralize the interim government and regain people's support in her favour. But her instructions, wrapped in conspiracy theories and strategies of resistance, have brought forth unintended consequences: instead of causing splits in opposition, they have cemented the revolutionary spirit and marked peoples' demand for reform. Hasina's inability to relate to the ground realities only highlights her disconnect, turning her into a symbol of what the people rose against. Her efforts, as theoretical perspectives indicate, reveal the enduring power of people. Cognitive dissonance within her denials, building up counter-hegemony in response, and a collective conscience binding students and citizens are a sure-shot indication that Bangladesh is acquiring a final overthrow of authoritarianism. Hasina's continuous attempts to wield power from abroad managed only to seal in the people's resolve for a new political order cantered on transparency, justice, and democracy. But contrary to hastening the destruction of this interim government, leaked phone calls have become rallying points for a fully alert public. It is this revolutionary spirit, brought on inadvertently by Hasina's words, that more than likely will remain one of the cornerstones in forging ahead with a more just and representative Bangladeshi society.

Dr. Serajul I Bhuiyan is a professor and former chair of the Department of Journalism and Mass Communications at Savannah State University, Savannah, Georgia. USA. And a Georgia Governor's

AI Teaching Fellow at Louise McBee Institute of Higher Education, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.​

 

[Saif]

What will the consequence of Awami League be?

The ruling Awami League coterie mercilessly shot dead the revolutionary students and people. As a party, in no way can Awami League shrug off this responsibility

en.prothomalo.com

What will the consequence of Awami League be?
Maruf Mullick
Updated: 22 Nov 2024, 22: 33

What will be the consequence of Awami League, the autocratic party that has been toppled from power? This question arose after the 5 August student-people's revolution, following which Sheikh Hasina and her people fled to India. While these Awami Leaguers may have all fled, they have left behind a bloody revolution's history of a brutal massacre.

The liability of the massacre in this revolution lies with Awami League. The ruling Awami League coterie mercilessly shot dead the revolutionary students and people. As a party, in no way can Awami League shrug off this responsibility. Due to this genocide and pitiless repression and suppression, the question naturally arises as to whether Awami League can return to politics or not. And even if they do, can their return with this same name?

After the fall of BKSAL in 1975, Awami League returned in its own name in 1979 during the rule of Ziaur Rahman. Even back then there were allegations against Awami League and BKSAL of using its para-military Rakshi Bahini to indiscriminately kill and torture civilians. Awami League faces the same allegations all over again.

Sheikh Hasina's Awami League is a continuity of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's misrule. That is why the question has arisen regarding Awami League's right to practice politics. While various quarters are deliberating and debating on the issue, the chief advisor has placed the matter of rehabilitating Awami League on the shoulders of Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP).

In a recent interview with the Indian media, he said, "BNP wants the election with all parties in participation. BNP is a large party. We have accepted their demand." But the BNP secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir has rejected this. He said, "We never said that we wanted to bring anyone to the election." While the chief advisor referred in BNP, in September it had been the amir of Jamaat-e-Islami who had also said that they did not want a ban on Awami League.

In the meantime, the government's advisor Asif Mahmud has said, when the topic of banning Awami League arose, the political parties opposed this in its statements. He referred to Germany's Nazi Party in this regard, saying that the party had been banned in 1945 and remains banned till date. He said that Awami League should face the same predicament.

It apparently seems that the government wants to keep the doors open to a ban of Awami League. The political parties, however, do not support this. The students are for a ban. Yet the political parties should have been the ones demanding a ban on Awami League. After all, they were the victims of repression for a long one and a half decades. Yet now the contrary is happening.

The government probably wanted to proceed towards a ban on Awami League. It had drawn up a draft for the International Crimes Tribunal to take action against any political party involved in crimes against humanity. The law advisor Asif Nazrul had said that the ICT Act was being amended and this provision would be added. This provision was not added to the amendment later. Instead, the government pitched the ball into the opposition parties' court.

Had this clause been added to the act, Awami League could have been proven guilty of crimes against humanity. The tribunal has ample evidence to prove Awami League's guilt in this regard. Also, the chief advisor Dr Muhammad Yunus has said that the massacre during revolution will be brought to justice. Assistance will be sought from the international courts in this regard. He has even spoken about the matter at various places, he said in his address to the nation.

He said that not only will the massacre during the July revolution be placed on trial, but justice will also be ensured for the enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings that took place over the past 15 years. Other than this law, the government can ban Awami League through the court by referring to Article 16 of the Political Parties Ordinance of 1978. No matter what a hue and cry Awami League leaders may raise, or no matter whether the political parties take a stand against the ban or not, Awami League's space will shrink if the students want to ban the party. The students are keeping the pressure on in this regard.

While this is the stand of the government and the students, why do the political parties not speak out directly on the issue of banning Awami League? Have BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami forgotten the repression and torture unleashed upon them over the past 15 years? Have they forgotten so soon the cases filed against thousands and thousands of their party leaders and workers, how they were like refugees hiding as fugitives within their own country, the enforced disappearances, the extrajudicial killings?

They had kept BNP's chairperson Khaleda Zia incarcerated in false cases year after year. Awami League did not allow her to go abroad for treatment. They pushed her towards death with no proper medical treatment. They exiled BNP's acting chairman Tarique Rahman.

When the faces of Shaheed Abu Sayeed, Mugdha, Nafees whose bullet-ridden body was draped over a rickshaw, and the thousands of other martyrs, come before our eyes, we simply cannot even think of rehabilitating Awami League.

Perhaps it is with all this brutal torture in mind that BNP and Jamaat want to avoid banning any party, but instead build up a liberal political culture of tolerance. They have distanced themselves from the code of the Amorite kind Hammurabi, "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." They want the persons to be placed on trial rather than the party. These two parties possibly want to push aside politics of vengeance and vendetta and start politics of a new age. This may be their liberal stance or strategy. But it should be seen whether this strategy is realistic and relevant to the times.

It is true that an unleashing of vengeance was avoided after 5 August. Credit must be given to BNP and the other parties in this regard. The people want to see not just the Awami League leaders and activists being tried, they want to see Awami League in the dock too. No one is talking about revenge. They are talking about justice. It is not tolerant politics to let a criminal off the hook. The people may not accept such a soft stance of BNP regarding Awami League. As individuals and as a party they committed crimes against humanity during the July rebellion. Awami League as an organisation must face trial for these crimes. If the political parties cannot grasp the sentiments of the people, they will lose their position in the political arena.

Contemporary history indicates that fascist parties guilty of genocide have failed to return to politics. Not just in Germany or Italy, there had been authoritarian governments in various Latin American countries too. Most of them had to face trial eventually.

In that sense, Awami League too should not be able to return to politics. If everything proceeds normally and if Dr Yunus' words are implemented, then most of the leaders of Awami League as well as the bureaucrats and police officers who served during Awami League's rule will be proven guilty of genocide. Not just individuals, but Awami League as a party will face punishment. After all, it was both individuals and groups who were involved in these crimes. If law proceeds on the correct path and if the support of the international court is availed, then Awami League and its leaders will not be able to escape the liability of genocide.

If Awami League is banned, what could the possible repercussions be on a local and international level? Will Awami League men create chaos throughout the country? If everyone remains united, Awami League will not be able to do anything. And it is possible to hold the election even after banning and removing Awami League. This election will be accepted by the entire world. A free and fair election in a democratic environment will be acceptable to anyone. No one is taking about keeping a democratic Awami League out of the election. It is about keeping a fascist Awami League out of the election, an Awami League's whose hands are stained with the blood of innocent students and common people.

Awami League has lost its democratic character. Awami League was never democratic as a party. Every time that it came to power, it took on the character of a totalitarian tyrant. There is no reason to believe that the election will be one-sided without Awami League. If necessary a new party can be formed. In East Bengal, the two major parties were Congress and Muslim League. But they did not catch on to the people's mindset here and so after 1947 Congress was no longer here. Awami League filled that gap.

From 1947 to 1971 Muslim League also failed to grasp the psyche of the people. So they evaporated too after 1971. Then JSD came along. They too failed to practice politics, resorting instead to killings, robbery and repeated coup attempts. They too were soon lost from politics. Later, it was BNP that filled that space and they remain steadfast in politics. Over the past 15 years Awami League paid no heed to people's views. That is why now they have had to flee from the country. No party had to leave the country bag and baggage in such a manner. It would indeed be a reckless to make an attempt to bring back a party that has fled.

We must remain aware that Awami League is still active. Without understanding the situation, they are sitting outside of the country and making all sorts of threats. Normal politics is not possible with such a party. After the party is banned, its leaders and activists may assemble under a different name. They can form a new party.

But it will not be so easy to enter politics just if they want. After all, everyone knows very well who are in Awami League at a national level. It will not be possible for them to reorganise. As members of a banned party, they too will lose the right to practice politics. Nor it will not be easy on their part to form a new party. Excluding them and forming a party with new recruits will have no impact or influence.

But they will be able to pick up Awami League politics if the government and the political parties allow them. In the past, Awami League shrugged off BKSAL and came forward in 1979 with a clean image under Zohra Tajuddin. But it did not remain clean.

Coming to power in 1996, it ushered in the mafia rule of Haji Selim, Haji Maqbul, Hazari, Shamim Islam and others. Now there is talk of rehabilitating Awami League with people of clean image. But the party is imbued with fascist ideology. It is not possible for them to practice democracy. There is simply no alternative but to place Awami League in the dock as a political organisation.

When the faces of Shaheed Abu Sayeed, Mugdha, Nafees whose bullet-ridden body was draped over a rickshaw, and the thousands of other martyrs, come before our eyes, we simply cannot even think of rehabilitating Awami League. No matter how politely the fugitive Awami League leader Hasan Mahmud now refers to BNP's acting chairman Tarique Rahman has 'sir' and 'sahib', everyone is only too aware of his cruel and ruthless nature.

* Dr Maruf Mullick is a political analyst​

 

[Saif]

Hasina’s claims are nothing but a distortion of facts

India’s failure to prevent such false narratives won’t help bilateral relations

www.thedailystar.net

Hasina’s claims are nothing but a distortion of facts
India’s failure to prevent such false narratives won’t help bilateral relations

VISUAL: STAR

We strongly oppose the false narrative propagated by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in her first public appearance—a virtual address at an event in New York—since fleeing Bangladesh following the July mass uprising. Her accusation that Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus is involved in perpetrating "genocide" clearly demonstrates that she is speaking from a place of vengeance, in total disregard for facts. In reality, it is Hasina who stands accused of being involved in mass murder during the uprising, along with numerous other grievous human rights violations committed during her 15 years of fascistic rule, for which there is substantial evidence. In her pursuit of vengeance against Prof Yunus, she has not only vilified him but also tarnished Bangladesh's image.

For instance, in her virtual address, she falsely claimed that Hindus, Buddhists, and Christians have been persecuted in large numbers in Bangladesh since her government was ousted. This blatant lie, initially spread on social media, is now being amplified in a coordinated effort by certain sections of the Indian media and political class. Echoing the narrative of those who have been systematically demonising Bangladesh recently, Hasina falsely claimed that Chinmoy Krishna Das, the former ISKCON leader, was arrested in response to Hindus protesting their persecution in the country. Ironically, many communal incidents occurred during her own rule which she failed to prevent or acknowledge.

Furthermore, Hasina stated that she had left the country to prevent further bloodshed when protesters were heading towards Ganabhaban. However, as this and other media outlets then reported, until her final moments in office, she made every effort to cling to power through the use of even more force, at the cost of spilling more blood. This was only prevented when the army refused to fire on the citizens.

Given the seriousness of the crimes she is accused of committing, we are disappointed that the Indian government, which gave her shelter, did not do more to prevent her from propagating such false narratives against Bangladesh's current government that emerged from a popular uprising. Moreover, the fact that her campaign to demonise Bangladesh is increasingly aligning with right-wing Indian media raises questions about whether India truly seeks "stable and constructive relations" with Bangladesh, as the Indian high commissioner recently asserted. This is particularly concerning given the ample evidence—such as leaked recordings of her phone calls—suggesting that Hasina has been trying to instigate and destabilise Bangladesh from New Delhi. In response, the Bangladeshi government—including its chief adviser—requested that its Indian counterpart prevent Hasina from carrying out such disruptive activities.

Yet, ignoring Bangladesh's request, the Indian government has not taken any substantial steps to dissuade the deposed former prime minister from spewing hateful rhetoric against Bangladesh. By doing so, how is India helping our bilateral relations? India should carefully consider how such decisions will affect its relationship with Bangladesh. We also hope the Indian media, instead of repeating Hasina's lies, portrays Bangladesh accurately in order to prevent harm to the relations between the two countries.​

 

[Saif]

ICT bans publication of Hasina’s hate speech

The International Crimes Tribunal on Thursday asked the government to ban the broadcasting and publication of any ‘hate speech’ or ‘incitement’ allegedly made by deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina...

www.newagebd.net

ICT bans publication of Hasina’s hate speech
M Moneruzzaman 05 December, 2024, 14:21

The International Crimes Tribunal on Thursday asked the government to ban the broadcasting and publication of any ‘hate speech’ or ‘incitement’ allegedly made by deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who fled to India amid the student-people uprising on August 5.

The order followed Hasina’s implication in a filed on charges of crimes against humanity for over 1,500 murders and scores of injuries in indiscriminate firing, torture and other atrocities during the July-August uprising.

The tribunal of Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and retired district judge Md Mohitul Haq Anam Chowdhury passed the order after hearing a petition filed by chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam.

The tribunal asked its registrar to immediately notify the secretaries of the ministries of information and broadcasting and information and communication technology as well as the Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission chairman to enforce the order.

It also asked the respondents to ensure the removal of all inflammatory content linked to Hasina from print, electronic and social media platforms.

The tribunal also took note of reported leaked telephone conversations between Hasina, also the Awami League president, and her party leaders that went viral on social media and were widely circulated in the press.

In the leaked conversations, Hasina reportedly asked AL leaders to hold rallies displaying images of US president-elect Donald Trump and urged her supporters to retaliate against those who reportedly attacked the homes of AL members.

Prosecutor Tamim Gazi Monwar Hossain argued that these statements met the criteria for hate speech as outlined in the United Nations’ Rabat Plan of Action.

The framework proposes a six-point threshold test, considers elements such as the context, speaker, intent, content, reach, and likelihood, including imminence, to determine whether an expression qualifies as criminal incitement.

Tamim emphasised that Hasina’s statements clearly fell within the parameters of incitement as defined by the Rabat Principles.

Tamim warned that Hasina’s rhetoric could obstruct the ongoing investigation into allegations of crimes against humanity and jeopardise the safety of witnesses and victims connected to the case.

The case accuses Hasina and her affiliates of orchestrating violence during the July-August movement, resulting in widespread deaths, injuries, and destruction.

The prosecution filed the application seeking ban on publication of Hasina’s speech following an amendment to section 23A of the amended International Crimes (Tribunals) Act ICT mandating tribunals to ‘take all necessary measures’ to ensure the safety, security, and well-being of witnesses providing testimony or evidence in proceedings under the act.

Section 23(2)(B) further empowers the tribunals to ‘order any protective measures deemed necessary to safeguard victims,’ either on their own initiative or upon a request from the prosecution or the victims.

On November 12, the tribunal directed the inspector general of police to request the Interpol to issue red notices for the arrest of Hasina and several of her associates.

Hasina, along with 46 cabinet members, party leaders and associates, faces arrest orders issued by the tribunal on October 17.

Chief prosecutor Md Tajul Islam informed the tribunal that steps were under way to secure Interpol assistance and a red notice would be sent to Hasina.​

 

[Saif]

Statements of a former PM from India ‘creating tension’

Environment Adviser to the interim government Syeda Rizwana Hasan today said Bangladesh has expressed its “unease” to India about statements made by a former Bangladesh prime minister from that country

www.thedailystar.net

Statements of a former PM from India ‘creating tension’
Says environment adviser after Indian delegation meets chief adviser

Photo: Collected

Environment Adviser to the interim government Syeda Rizwana Hasan today said Bangladesh has expressed its "unease" to India about statements made by a former Bangladesh prime minister from that country aiming at "creating tension".

"We made our position on this issue very clear," she said while briefing journalists on the outcome of a meeting between Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus and Indian External Affairs Secretary Vikram Misri in Dhaka.

India, on their part, reiterated their interest in strengthening and advancing relations with Bangladesh, she added.

The Indian delegation also clarified that their government is not responsible for the activities of certain media outlets or organisations spreading misleading narratives about Bangladesh, she further said.

Rizwana said India assured Bangladesh of their commitment to increasing the issuance of visas to Bangladeshis.

Regarding the recent attack on the Bangladesh mission in Agartala, she said India expressed regret over the incident after Dhaka protested.

"Since they have now expressed a commitment to advancing bilateral relations with the interim government, we are assuming that their earlier regret remains consistent."

On the issue of Sheikh Hasina, Rizwana said there were no new discussions about her extradition from India.

On propaganda against Bangladesh, she said the Indian government reiterated that such activities are not supported or endorsed by their administration.

Rizwana said in the meeting with the chief adviser, both sides emphasised their eagerness to strengthen bilateral relations.

India closely monitored the events of July and August in Bangladesh and expressed their awareness of the situation, she said.

From Bangladesh's side, the government reiterated its desire to see SAARC play a stronger role and emphasised the importance of regional cooperation within BIMSTEC, she added.

Additionally, Bangladesh raised concerns about the ongoing misinformation campaigns aimed at damaging Bangladesh's reputation as a nation of harmony, she further said.​

 

[Saif]

India denies giving any facility to Hasina for political activities

Indian foreign secretary Vikram Misri told a parliamentary committee that Sheikh Hasina was using ‘private communication devices’ to make her comments and India was not...

www.newagebd.net

India denies giving any facility to Hasina for political activities
Staff Correspondent 12 December, 2024, 15:38

Indian foreign secretary Vikram Misri. | UNB photo

Indian foreign secretary Vikram Misri told a parliamentary committee that Sheikh Hasina was using ‘private communication devices’ to make her comments and India was not involved in providing her with any platform or facility that enabled her to carry out her political activity from Indian soil.

He made the comments in his briefing to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs on his recent visit to Bangladesh, which was the first-high profile visit from New Delhi to Dhaka since Hasina’s downfall, Indian media reported on Wednesday.

He also told the panel that an early national election in Bangladesh was also expected, the Hindu reported.

It reported that Vikram described Hasina’s criticism of the interim government of Bangladesh as a pinprick and that India did not endorse deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

Vikram Misri told the parliamentary committee that Hasina was present in India in line with its culture and civilisational ethos of protecting friends, reported Indian Express.

Vikram made the comment when the parliamentary body sought to know the status of Hasina in India, where the deposed prime minister of Bangladesh went on August 5 fleeing a student-people uprising against her misrule of 15 years.

Most of the Indian media reports on Vikram’s briefing tsaid that his reply to the question of Hasina’s status was either not known or that he avoided replying.

Diplomatic tension between the two neighbouring countries recently ran high. India is accused by protesters in Bangladesh of acting like a big brother, taking advantage of Bangladesh by its sheer size.

The Hindu reported Vikram saying that India did not view the relation with Bangladesh as one based on ‘reciprocity’ but as one that was grounded on ‘good neighbourly relationship.’

Vikram also informed the committee that the issue of review of bilateral treaties did not feature in his conversation with chief adviser Yunus, the Hindu said.

Vikram said that India was concerned about the lack of acknowledgement of the alleged incidents of violence against minority communities but welcomed the latest report that authorities in Bangladesh had arrested 88 people related to the violence against minorities after the fall of the Hasina government, the Hindu reported.

For India, he said, the Bangladesh authorities’ decision to release many of the convicted ‘terrorists’ who indulged in anti-India rhetoric, remained an issue of deep concern. The Bangladesh authorities, meanwhile, flagged the ‘disinformation’ campaign in the Indian press about the events unfolding in that country.

Some parliamentary committee members raised the arrest of ISKCON monks in Bangladesh, the Hindu reported, but Vikram made no reply.

Vikram, however, told the committee that during his visit to Dhaka, he informed the authorities there that there had to be an ‘acknowledgment’ of the incidents of attacks on temples and the Indira Gandhi Cultural Centre.

He said that while there was an attempt by the interim government of Bangladesh to describe the reports as exaggeration or media creation, there were ‘credible’ organisations that documented some of the incidents that required to be addressed.​