- Copy to clipboard
- Moderator
- #1
- Jan 24, 2024
- 453
- 176
- Origin
- Residence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Iranian using Gatling Gun on the new missile boats to act as "distributed" CIWS with lower firing rate.
As far as I know these guns are controlled by EO system ..if they have a radar interface no one is talking about it..This doesn't really look like a CIWS, more like a RCWS.
is there any video of it in action?
Presumably It could function like the Sea Zenith onboard Turkish MEKOs but what radar is it tied to?
I find it extremely unlikely that it can function as an CIWS then.As far as I know these guns are controlled by EO system ..if they have a radar interface no one is talking about it..
Are computers controlling the guns with targeting data coming from the eo cameras or are people controlling the guns based on what they see on monitors from the cameras?If EO cameras could detect and track incoming missiles with reaction times fast enough for this. Other navies would have figured it out by now.
If the ship has an integrated combat system ( I read somewhere that they actually do) the ships main search radar will hand over the track report of the incoming missile to the EO processor which will swing the gun towards the threat direction and starts tracking the incoming missile via EO ..in this last phase there is no difference in speed of tracking..I find it extremely unlikely that it can function as an CIWS then.
If EO cameras could detect and track incoming missiles with reaction times fast enough for this. Other navies would have figured it out by now.
Maybe two separate radars is a bit of an overkill on Gökdeniz but it goes to show you that it takes a lot more to be effective.
View attachment 3710
If the ship has an integrated combat system ( I read somewhere that they actually do) the ships main search radar will hand over the track report of the incoming missile to the EO processor which will swing the gun towards the threat direction and starts tracking the incoming missile via EO ..in this last phase there is no difference in speed of tracking..
The drawback of EO is not in traking speed but in the shorter range that it can start tracking..so with radar CIWS you get to start tracking the incoming missile much sooner and hence more time to eliminate it and further away from the ship..
What can you tell us about the combat management systems on these ships?Ps: Combat architectures do all these calculations and hence I trust they have done that and figured the guns can do some good..lol
Depends on a lot of things, like if the cameras are fast enough, if their sensors are cooled well enough to be on all the time, if, and this is key they are looking at the right direction, I think this is why they had to use 4 of them on a single ship.Are computers controlling the guns with targeting data coming from the eo cameras or are people controlling the guns based on what they see on monitors from the cameras?
If computers are controlling the guns, would the reaction time not be sufficient?
Not much..This is the big "Black" box of the Iranian ships and aircraft that is so important and no info is available on it...All I know is that the Admiral of Iranian Regular navy once said our Latest corvett "DAYLAMAN" is fully integrated..What can you tell us about the combat management systems on these ships?