[🇧🇩-Airforce] MRCA Program of Bangladesh Air Force

[Bilal9]

What evidence do you have to back up your claims regarding the quality of J-10C aircraft?

প্রমান নাইক্কা, খামাখা চাপা মারে... নিজেরা পারেনা কিসু বানাইতে, শুধু চীন দেশের মালের বদনাম

 

[Jiangnan]

Your opinion doesn't count. Either good or bad. You guys are Xi's slave. You can think only to the extent Xi allows you to think.

Tejas Universe No.1. India Universe No.1. Respect India, Respect Modi. Please do not send the Shiva army to assassinate me.

 

[Jiangnan]

Krishna with Flute said:

It is an Air cooled mediocre radar with Low power. Had it been high power, it would have required greater cooling requirement. Example are car and byke engines. For greater cooling requirement in car, water cooling and radiators are requirement. J 10 being a mediocre fighter is evident from the data. Tejas MK2 with 56/98 KN Engine has a payload of 6.5 tones i.e 500 KG higher than Chinese J 10 which carries only 6000 k.g with 72/130 KN engine which is 35 to 40% powerful. It has higher take off time than even Tejas MK1A. It is not made low RCS. Atleast 19 had fallen down till 2021. It has high RCS and can be detected from a long distance. J10 A and B are total junk. J10 c is moderately good with addition of TVC and other stuff. Electronics was never a plus point of Chinese aircraft. It legs behind all nations making aircraft in AVIONICS. It has substandard weapons in terms of their WVR and BVER missiles with inferior seekers. They hype the range by citing highest range at high altitude which reduces to half at around 6000 to 8000 meter compared to 15000 meters.

Jiangnan,

Do you agree with Krishna with Flute about the quality of J-10?

I completely agree. We all know. Tejas is the world's most powerful fighter jet. 1 Tejas = 100 Rafale.

 

[Bilal9]

What evidence do you have to back up your claims regarding the quality of J-10C aircraft?

প্রমান নাইক্কা, খামাখা চাপা মারে... নিজেরা পারেনা কিসু বানাইতে, শুধু চীন দেশের মালের বদনাম

While comparing Tejas and JF 17, Global Times said the same thing. The last sentence of the article was " While JF 17 is a plane of present, Tejas is a plane of future".

How can it be a plane of the future being slightly better than MiG-29, Su-30 and Mirage 2000? It is antiquated as anything. The design and components are all over two decades old.

Too small and too old...

 

[Krishna with Flute]

প্রমান নাইক্কা, খামাখা চাপা মারে... নিজেরা পারেনা কিসু বানাইতে, শুধু চীন দেশের মালের বদনাম

How can it be a plane of the future being slightly better than MiG-29, Su-30 and Mirage 2000? It is antiquated as anything. The design and components are all over two decades old.

Too small and too old...

The words were used by Global times when the article was published when JF 17 was new. At that time (even today) Tejas had used lot more composite than any other aircraft and it was tweaked for low RCS design in the limitation of Aerodynamics. It had a very advance flight control system and lesser numbers of parts. It had a very good Israeli radar and multiple weapon options from India, Europe, Israel and Russia. It was very good when it came. It is good even today. That is why (Perhaps) Global Times had told it an aircraft of future. It was an aircraft of future at that time and that is why it is contemporary today. JF 17 was Contemporary at that time that is why out dated today.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

@Krishna with Flute

He has no access to open media. He knows only to the extent which Xi allows him to know. Do not take him seriously. If he tries to act like others, he will disappear like many other Chinese.

 

[Saif]

The words were used by Global times when the article was published when JF 17 was new. At that time (even today) Tejas had used lot more composite than any other aircraft and it was tweaked for low RCS design in the limitation of Aerodynamics. It had a very advance flight control system and lesser numbers of parts. It had a very good Israeli radar and multiple weapon options from India, Europe, Israel and Russia. It was very good when it came. It is good even today. That is why (Perhaps) Global Times had told it an aircraft of future. It was an aircraft of future at that time and that is why it is contemporary today. JF 17 was Contemporary at that time that is why out dated today.

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

My friend,

I have explained that in my early posts. It was said when JF 17 had arrived and both planes were compared. It is not something which someone has said today.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

And design of Tejas is not very old. It is contemporary delta wing design with RSS unstable platform. It is based on same philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen. Infact, JF 17 is outdated design with lavcon like F16 and Mig 29. J10 is even worse than that based on rejeted design of Lavi fighter. It has poor aerodynamics and that is why it has gone through noticable design Changes in A, B and C variant. Just look at the air intakes of A, B and C variant.

 

[Saif]

And design of Tejas is not very old. It is contemporary delta wing design with RSS unstable platform. It is based on same philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen. Infact, JF 17 is outdated design with lavcon like F16 and Mig 29. J10 is even worse than that based on rejeted design of Lavi fighter. It has poor aerodynamics and that is why it has gone through noticable design Changes in A, B and C variant. Just look at the air intakes of A, B and C variant.

The design of Tejas is 40 years old. It was first conceived in the 80s. So, your claim of Tejas being based on the same design philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen is not true.