[🇧🇩] NYPD Kills Bangladeshi Teen Win Rozario After He Calls 911 for Help, as His Mom Pleads for His Life

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIpmUe8MVAc

 

[Krishna with Flute]

There was definitely a Bharat. Who is denying that?

It was a geographical construct.

A loose cultural construct, basis the native (mixed with imported Vedic) religion.

It was not a nation.

What is more important than Nation is cultural identity and feeling of oneness. Though, Nepal and India are different nation today, people still have Roti Beti relation. Incase, Nepal merges with India, there won't be much issues. They can assimilate easily with India. This is the reason why 6 million Nepalis earn their livelihood in India without any viza and have merged with local population without much problem. I see more similarities between rural Gujarat people and rural Pakistani people of some area of Sindh than between Kerelites. India is nation not because different people came to gather, formed a union and unanimously decided to form a nation with federal structure. In Kashi Vishwanath, priest is always from South India. Kashivishwanath Darshan is incomplete without the darshan of Pashupatinath. This cultural bonding is much stronger than L**d identity of nation. Look at Pakistan. Baloch do not consider them Pakistanis, nor Pashtuns. A nation without shared value and shared culture is a L**d nation like Pakistan while people feel one though they are from different nation. Example, Nepali and Indian Hindus, Pakistani and Irani Baloch, Pakistani and Afghani Pashtuns.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

No it is most definitely not true for India.

No central rule or single ruler.

No single political entity.

No single flag.

No single central army.

People never identified as one and fought a common enemy under one banner.

You fail all the basics of a nation state.

You are a civilization state. Much as Europe is a western civilization state.

Of multiple nations.

Races. Ethnicities. Languages.

All these kings had Marriage relation amongst themselves. Gujart Kings had Rajasthani Queen, Mysore king's wife was from Kathiyawad (Saurashtra Region of Gujarat). Ramji's wife Mata sita was from Nepal. All were relatives. Because of vast geographical area and diverse culture, there were many kingdom.
Kingdom of Chandragupta had many areas under his reign beyond today's India. His kingdom fulfills most of the criterion you noted. So as the case with Samudragupta and Lalitaditya Muktapid who rulled many parts of Today's China and Russia as well.
Race, Ethnicity and Language is a L**D European concept for a nation. India with over 28 languages and over 700 dialects is a much united nation than 26 Arab nations with same language, ethnicity and race.

 

[Lulldapull]

Sharma is one of those most intrinsically subjugated.

He sucks cock 24/7. I've totally lost my patience with him.

Problem personality. And the fool used to bully Jamahir.

At least Jamahir was not a loyal cock sucker.

A lun choos.

Sharma would eventually come around to da right side doc......hes just like a child. We're talking to him.....he's getting it slowly......but I have hope that he'd eventually turn and realize that all dis nonsense is just.....nonsense. Khud colluddz hae, so he's already half way there already. Eventually he'd understand dat sucking off the Zio's is pointless. I mean as an Indian colluddzz fella he should know better.

 

[Lulldapull]

What is more important than Nation is cultural identity and feeling of oneness. Though, Nepal and India are different nation today, people still have Roti Beti relation. Incase, Nepal merges with India, there won't be much issues. They can assimilate easily with India. This is the reason why 6 million Nepalis earn their livelihood in India without any viza and have merged with local population without much problem. I see more similarities between rural Gujarat people and rural Pakistani people of some area of Sindh than between Kerelites. India is nation not because different people came to gather, formed a union and unanimously decided to form a nation with federal structure. In Kashi Vishwanath, priest is always from South India. Kashivishwanath Darshan is incomplete without the darshan of Pashupatinath. This cultural bonding is much stronger than L**d identity of nation. Look at Pakistan. Baloch do not consider them Pakistanis, nor Pashtuns. A nation without shared value and shared culture is a L**d nation like Pakistan while people feel one though they are from different nation. Example, Nepali and Indian Hindus, Pakistani and Irani Baloch, Pakistani and Afghani Pashtuns.

Iraanddz a nation Krishna......2500 saal ho gaey bhai......Aaaj US k saamnay kharra hae refusing to surrender. Aaap kar saktay ho what Iraaandzz is doing?
No right, cuz the Zio's already own you. Yous can't do it bhai cuz yous ain't a nation. Just like baqisstaanndd no?

 

[Vsdoc]

What is more important than Nation is cultural identity and feeling of oneness. Though, Nepal and India are different nation today, people still have Roti Beti relation. Incase, Nepal merges with India, there won't be much issues. They can assimilate easily with India. This is the reason why 6 million Nepalis earn their livelihood in India without any viza and have merged with local population without much problem. I see more similarities between rural Gujarat people and rural Pakistani people of some area of Sindh than between Kerelites. India is nation not because different people came to gather, formed a union and unanimously decided to form a nation with federal structure. In Kashi Vishwanath, priest is always from South India. Kashivishwanath Darshan is incomplete without the darshan of Pashupatinath. This cultural bonding is much stronger than L**d identity of nation. Look at Pakistan. Baloch do not consider them Pakistanis, nor Pashtuns. A nation without shared value and shared culture is a L**d nation like Pakistan while people feel one though they are from different nation. Example, Nepali and Indian Hindus, Pakistani and Irani Baloch, Pakistani and Afghani Pashtuns.

Thank you for changing goalpost.

So we agree.

India was never a nation.

Forget 5000 years.