[🇧🇩] Press Freedom in Bangladesh

[Saif]

Media reform should address sectoral male bias

WOMEN’S rights activists and media scholars consider developing a gender-sensitive reporting strategy and an effective system to monitor journalistic practices in print, broadcast and digital media as a priority agenda for media sector reforms. They have expressed their concern at a roundtable...

www.newagebd.net

Media reform should address sectoral male bias
27 January, 2025, 00:00

WOMEN’S rights activists and media scholars consider developing a gender-sensitive reporting strategy and an effective system to monitor journalistic practices in print, broadcast and digital media as a priority agenda for media sector reforms. They have expressed their concern at a roundtable discussion on gender-sensitive reporting and said that the majority of media outlets do not have a gender policy. The policy vacuum results in biased and sensationalised reporting. Considering the biased representation of women, their concerns are not misplaced. Victim-blaming is not uncommon in reporting on issues of gender-based violence and gender inequality. Despite a legal bar on disclosing the identity of rape victims, the media have disclosed the identity of victims on a number of occasions. Sensationalised and objectified representation of women for profiteering has also been a concern. The media reforms commission, formed in November 2024, with plans to revitalise the tradition of public interest journalism and strengthen media freedom should, therefore, make gender policy a priority concern.

In addition to patriarchal bias in reporting, there are other concerns. In recent times, the media sector has seen a significant growth, with 45 television channels, 25 FM radio stations, 32 community radio stations, 1,248 daily newspapers and more than 100 online news portals. Women, however, account for only 4 per cent of the work force and they seldom have access to leadership and decision-making. Studies have showed how patriarchal bias in human resource management and labour policy, particularly reluctance at granting maternity leave or ensuring child care, led to a high drop-out rate among women journalists. Except for a few print media houses, the sector does not comply with the High Court order that has asked all employers to set up anti-sexual harassment cells in offices. It has been reported how unresolved cases of sexual harassment have compelled women to leave their profession. The gender-based wage gap has also been reported. Professional associations for journalists have also failed to ensure women’s representation and rarely addressed issues of gender discrimination. It is, therefore, not an overstatement that the media landscape is male-dominated.

Media reforms should, therefore, include an outlined policy to ensure gender-sensitive reporting and increased women’s participation. In doing so, the government should review the licensing process so that no new media house is given a license without a gender policy and an anti-sexual harassment cell. The Press Institute of Bangladesh and other similar agencies can play a role in providing appropriate training in gender issues and developing a mechanism to prevent sensationalised reporting for profiteering interests. Professional associations of journalists should abandon their male bias and consider fighting patriarchy in the sector and society.​

 

[Saif]

High cost of journalism

Journalism is always challenging, and journalists are subject to various forms of intimidation due to their role in maintaining professionalism. Governments are generally not comfortable with the works of journalists, although, in democratic states, they are obliged to provide adequate room f

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

High cost of journalism
Tanim Asjad
Published :
Jan 31, 2025 23:00
Updated :
Jan 31, 2025 23:00

Journalism is always challenging, and journalists are subject to various forms of intimidation due to their role in maintaining professionalism. Governments are generally not comfortable with the works of journalists, although, in democratic states, they are obliged to provide adequate room for journalism to function. The media is also obligated to play a responsible role in this connection. In this process, an environment of mutual cooperation develops for people's greater interests. Responsible media helps maintain the checks and balances of the government and the establishment. There is, however, no ideal democratic country in the world where journalists enjoy complete independence in their works and freedom of speech is fully ensured. Nevertheless, almost all functional democracies provide the required environment for newspapers and media with some limitations.

Like autocratic and authoritarian countries, non-functional democracies impose various media restrictions, making it difficult to work independently and professionally. Thus, journalism becomes distorted and suppressed in these countries. The autocratic regimes also adopt different techniques to make the media dysfunctional, biased and embedded. Undue monitoring, surveillance and financial tightening forced media outlets to compromise their stance. Supporting the pro-establishment media is another tool for holding back the professional works of journalism. Bangladesh is a good example of this.

During the autocratic regime of Sheikh Hasina, the tool was applied skillfully only to extract pressure on the media and distort the market. The net result is a sharp division among the journalists in the name of party-based so-called ideology. One group blindly extended their support to the Hasina regime on the plea that the regime was the only force that upheld the spirit of the liberation war. They argued that the misdeeds and wrongdoings of the regime should be ignored and not be reported in the media. This section of journalists was awarded for their loyalist role, making it more difficult for others to work professionally. Besides state agencies, the Hasina-loyal media also took a position against those who were critical of the regime, setting a bad example with a long-term negative effect.

During the mass uprising in July-August last year, the media in Bangladesh came under fire for not playing the appropriate role and the professionalism of journalists was questioned seriously. Except for a few media outlets and some journalists, most followed a cautious approach to the plea to avoid backlash from the ousted Hasina government and her political party. The pro-regime journalists also played a role in suppressing the news of killing and intimidating the government to suppress the student-led movement. So, after the fall of Hasina, who fled to India for shelter on August 5, journalists across the country faced intense criticism for obvious reasons. Their trustworthiness also came under question.

The problem is, however, not limited to Bangladesh. Media in India, the largest democracy in the world, has also been facing growing challenges due to the works of pro-government journalists and Modi loyalists. The term' godi media' has been popularised since 2014, indicating a large number of Indian media's non-professional and biased attitude. Instead of informing people properly, the 'godi media' is busy with cooking and fabricating stories where truth is mixed with fiction. The coverage of different things inside and outside India thus often becomes distorted and false. The proliferation of 'godi media' has put reputed newspapers like The Hindu under significant stress.

Again, think about Haaretz, the oldest daily in Israel, which has Hebrew and English versions. After the Hamas assault on October 7, Israel started a full-scale invasion of Gaza, causing the death of 50,000 Palestinians and the destruction of most of the physical infrastructures in the strip. The 15 months of war halted as two sides agreed on a fragile cease-fire deal with effect from January 20. During these months, Haaretz took a strong stance to cover the war in a balanced and unbiased manner that was completely absent in most Israeli and Western media. Israeli government continuously put pressure on the oldest daily and its journalists for its professional stance. The newspaper, however, sustained at a greater cost, setting an example of journalistic ethics and the establishment's unwillingness to accept the truth.​

 

[Saif]

73% people do not read newspapers

Newspapers are losing their appeal across the country, with more readers choosing mobile phones as the preferred device for reading news nowadays, according to a study by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).

www.thedailystar.net

73% people do not read newspapers
Finds BBS survey on 45,000 households across 64 dists

​

• Only 26% read news​
• 59% read news on phones​
• 37% prefer print newspapers​
• Popular consensus is on media independence​

Newspapers are losing their appeal across the country, with more readers choosing mobile phones as the preferred device for reading news nowadays, according to a study by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).

According to its findings released yesterday, 26 percent of respondents said they read newspapers. About 59 percent read news on mobile phones, while 37 percent prefer print newspapers.

Those who don't read newspapers make up 73 percent of the respondents, with 46 percent saying they do not feel it is necessary.

"Overall, people haven't lost trust in the media, but interference from political arena, government and influential persons is seen as a major obstacle to publishing objective news," said Md Sayem Hossain, senior information officer of the Media Reforms Commission, in a press release issued yesterday.

The BBS survey, the first of its kind in the country, was conducted across 64 districts, involving the participation of members from 45,000 households aged 10 and above.

Meanwhile, 65 percent of people watch television. Among the 34.58 percent who do not, 53 percent said they don't find it necessary.

During a national disaster or crisis, 35 percent of people first look for updates on news channels on television, followed by 28 percent who turn to social media, and 24 percent who ask a trustworthy person.

The survey reveals that the people want to see the media independent, impartial, and free from government and political influence.

Of the respondents, 15 percent said mass media in the country is not free at all, while 23 percent said it is partially free, 24 percent said it is largely free, and 17 percent believe it is fully free.

Among the 6,849 respondents who believe mass media is not free at all, most cited political interference as the main reason, followed by government interference and influence by powerful individuals.

Nationally, 67 percent of people expect mass media to be independent, 60 percent expect media neutrality or impartiality, 37 percent want media to be free from political influence, and 32 percent expect mass media to be free from government influence.

Most people think state-owned Bangladesh Television and Bangladesh Betar should be operated under the stewardship of the government. Over 56 percent of people believe Bangladesh Television should be operated under government control, while 55 percent said the same for Bangladesh Betar.

In the case of radio, 93 percent of respondents said they do not listen to the radio, with 54 percent saying that they do not find it necessary.​

 

[Saif]

A new reality for free media

Sadly, some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

www.thedailystar.net

A new reality for free media
We must learn from the past

VISUAL: SALMAN SAKIB SHAHRYAR

Before, when we spoke the truth, we were countered by the state and its agencies. Now, when we speak the truth, we are countered not by the state, but by lies, accusations without any proof, and tagging on the basis of hate narratives. Outrageous accusations are being made against legacy media without any evidence. In rare cases, when examples are cited, they are either false, taken out of context, distorted, or twisted to suit a predetermined goal. Thus, the media today is facing a new challenge in the post-truth era with an audience that is not used to such falsehood, half-truths and distortions, and as such is being victimised and misled.

I am heartened by a recent comment by the chief adviser's press secretary, Shafiqul Alam, for his emphatic assertion of the need for a free media for a country's advancement. He also stressed the necessity to examine the media's role in distorting objective journalism and upholding the fascistic policy and governance structure of the past regime. He repeatedly stressed that power must always be held to account, and invited all media outlets to scrutinise his own government's performance in the spirit of total independence and professionalism.

We would like to commend him for his stance and focus on two aspects of his remarks: the need to examine our past, and to chalk out a path for the media's unfettered and independent future journey.

As for the past, it is true that most newspapers did not challenge the dictatorial regime of Sheikh Hasina during her rule of over 15 years. They either vigorously supported it or hid the truth, deflected issues that deserved criticism, or distorted facts so that the public wouldn't feel negative about the regime.

There were a few of us who defied all threats—both public and undercover—and carried on speaking truth to power. In the case of this newspaper, the antagonism burst into fury when we invited Prof Muhammad Yunus as chief guest at our 25th anniversary celebration in 2016. In the presence of thousands of invited guests, including 22 editors from South and Southeast Asia, a drama was enacted by several Awami League (AL) ministers who publicly staged a walkout, shouting condemnatory remarks, accusing this writer of having insulted them when Prof Yunus appeared on the stage to deliver the keynote speech. This newspaper was accused of "launching" (whatever that meant) Prof Yunus and giving him a huge national and international platform to work against the Hasina government. (Given her venomous remarks, relentless personal attacks, and fictitious cases against Yunus ever since, one can understand her fury against this newspaper and its editor.) From then on, we were her declared "enemy," and she treated us as such. The avalanche of cases started within hours of that event using my remark on a TV show as a pretext.

This newspaper's editor was charged in 84 cases, 16 of which were for sedition. Several times on the floor of parliament, the former prime minister termed The Daily Star and Prothom Alo "anti-state," "anti-Awami League," and "anti-people." Many AL MPs castigated this newspaper in parliament, accusing us of "indulging" in all sorts of "conspiracies." Even some non-AL MPs joined the castigation, demanding the closure of this newspaper and jailing of its editor. On one occasion, the former prime minister spoke for 21 minutes in parliament denigrating this newspaper's editor, casting doubt on his role as a freedom fighter and raising all sorts of false questions against him. A few years later, during the opening of the Padma Bridge, she falsely accused this writer of travelling to the US and meeting high-level State Department officials and the World Bank president to lobby for the cancellation of the WB loan, as part of Prof Yunus's alleged "efforts" (totally false) to scuttle the Padma Bridge project. For nearly 15 years, we were never allowed to attend the former prime minister's press conferences or any of her functions. We were never allowed to cover her foreign trips or ask her questions as the head of the government. Over time, all her ministers, save one or two, started to avoid us, not allowing our reporters to talk to them and speaking against us whenever the occasion permitted. And all this while some 40 national and international businesses were asked not to give us any advertisement, abruptly reducing our revenue by 40 percent. This continued till the July uprising last year.

We are proud to say that The Daily Star never buckled, thanks to our staff, our board of directors, and the leadership.

The CA's press secretary also laid emphasis on examining not only the past, but also how media covered the events of July-August 2024, now popularly called the Monsoon Revolution. We welcome this decision and thank him for his praise that some media, in spite of severe threats, published prominently the number of students and general people being killed daily.

We also need to examine the politicisation of journalist unions. A special focus should be given on the role of the owners of media houses who used their outlets to eulogise the Hasina government for business purposes, get illegal bank loans, get lucrative contracts, retain untaxed profits, and indulge in money laundering. When directed by the owners, working journalists did not have much of a choice. We think the editors should have tried to prevent that—and failing that, they should have resigned.

Against all the laudable things that are being said about the freedom of media and the present opportunity to engage in independent journalism, we are sad to say that some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

As of November 2024, as many as 140 journalists have been accused of murder and cases have been filed against them on the basis of their reporting of the student-led mass uprising. Twenty eight journalists have been charged with crime against humanity. We strongly feel that the interim government's treatment of journalists has been sweeping, denigrating, and devoid of the sensitivity that this profession deserves. At this moment, we have the highest number of "murder-accused" journalists in the world. In this situation, how likely is it that the world will believe this government is handling the media fairly? Whatever criticism that this government has so far received from world bodies—Human Rights Watch (HRW), Committee for the Protection of Journalists (CPJ), Reporters without Borders (RSF)—has mostly been for the way journalists are being treated.

It has been several months since the cases against journalists were filed. We know of no progress in terms of verification of the accusations. An eight-member committee by the interim government was formed to monitor harassment cases against journalists on October 27. No progress on this account has been reported till now. All this, while the accused journalists are unable to do their regular jobs, take care of their families, and in some cases pay for their children's education. They are also suffering from social humiliation and leading a life of constant fear, lest they be arrested. For any criminal or unethical action, a journalist must face the law as any other citizen. But everyone must be guaranteed the due process under the law, which is their constitutional right.

We appeal to the interim government, given all their professed commitment to free and independent media, to take an immediate look into the cases against journalists and bring them to an accepted legal standard.

Mahfuz Anam is the editor and publisher of The Daily Star.​

 

[Saif]

Bangladesh’s media crossroads

THE media landscape in Bangladesh has undergone a seismic transformation over the past few decades. From the era of a single state-run television channel, BTV, to the proliferation of private TV networks and the meteoric rise of digital platforms, the industry has witnessed both unprecedented...

www.newagebd.net

Bangladesh’s media crossroads
Rezaul Hasan 20 February, 2025, 00:00

THE media landscape in Bangladesh has undergone a seismic transformation over the past few decades. From the era of a single state-run television channel, BTV, to the proliferation of private TV networks and the meteoric rise of digital platforms, the industry has witnessed both unprecedented growth and daunting challenges. As traditional media faces steady decline, the digital revolution offers both opportunities and threats, demanding a strategic recalibration to sustain the industry’s future.

Until the 1990s, Bangladesh’s media was dominated by BTV, alongside a few print and radio outlets. A turning point came in 1992 when satellite broadcasting introduced foreign television channels to Bangladeshi audiences, marking the advent of cable TV. However, it was the digital revolution — particularly after 2003 — that fundamentally reshaped media consumption habits.

According to Kantar, 67 per cent of Bangladeshi households now own television sets, with TV media exposure rising from 48 per cent to 70 per cent over the past two decades. Simultaneously, digital media has experienced exponential growth, signifying a radical shift in audience behaviour. Yet, with every opportunity comes a set of challenges that threaten to derail progress.

Despite the rapid evolution of digital platforms, the country’s media industry faces severe financial constraints. Print media is in steady decline, radio is on the brink of disappearance, and television channels struggle to maintain sustainable revenue streams. These issues are exacerbated by the lack of a robust audience measurement system, which hampers effective media planning and investment.

Bangladesh’s media industry operates within a fragile financial model. The primary stakeholders — advertisers, agencies, and media houses — are grappling with shifting dynamics. While multinational corporations have historically dominated media investment, local conglomerates are now leading the charge. However, a significant portion of media investment — over one-third — is still managed in-house by advertisers, bypassing media agencies altogether.

Moreover, Bangladesh lags behind its South Asian counterparts in media exposure. While 70 per cent of Bangladeshis watch television, this figure is overshadowed by Pakistan’s 92 per cent and Sri Lanka’s 75 per cent. Print readership is even lower, with only 11 per cent of Bangladeshis engaging with newspapers compared to 25 per cent in India. Additionally, 60-70 per cent of TV viewing time in Bangladesh is dominated by foreign channels, particularly from West Bengal, further diminishing the market share of local broadcasters.

The advertising industry, which remains a vital source of revenue for media, is also experiencing significant changes. Multinational companies have traditionally led media investments in Bangladesh, but in recent years, local businesses have gained ground. Brands such as Unilever, Marico, Reckitt Benckiser, and Grameenphone continue to be major advertisers, but domestic corporations like ACI Limited, Dutch Bangla Bank, and Pran-RFL are expanding their presence. This shift presents both an opportunity and a challenge — while increased local investment strengthens the industry, the growing trend of direct media buying by advertisers weakens the role of agencies, disrupting the traditional ecosystem of media planning and buying.

Enhanced audience measurement systems are essential for media planning. Strengthening TV ratings systems, national media surveys, and digital analytics will enable advertisers and agencies to optimise investments and ensure content is tailored to audience preferences. A more transparent and data-driven approach will create a level playing field, fostering sustainable competition in the advertising sector.

Robust media policies and revenue models must be developed to support local content production. Unlike other South Asian nations, local broadcasters do not benefit from cable TV subscription revenues, despite the market being three times larger than the TV advertising industry (valued at Tk. 1,600 crore annually). Implementing policies that allow local channels to earn a share of subscription revenue could provide a much-needed financial boost. Additionally, fostering syndication opportunities, diversifying revenue streams, and forming strategic content partnerships with corporate and public stakeholders will strengthen the industry’s economic foundation.

The demand for high-quality local content is another crucial factor that must be addressed. Countries like Pakistan and Sri Lanka have successfully retained audiences through strong local programming, yet Bangladesh continues to see a significant portion of its audience turn to foreign content. This trend underscores the urgent need for investment in original, compelling media productions that cater to local tastes and cultural narratives. Strengthening content production and fostering collaborations between media houses, advertisers, and production studios will help retain audiences and enhance the competitiveness of Bangladesh’s media sector.

Investing in talent development is crucial for the media sector to thrive. A workforce that blends creativity with analytical expertise is necessary to navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Academic programmes, training initiatives, and technological skill development will equip professionals with the necessary tools to keep pace with industry changes.

Technology adoption is also vital to ensuring media sustainability. The rise of digital media means that traditional platforms must integrate new technologies such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, and programmatic advertising to remain relevant. Media houses must embrace innovative strategies to monetise content effectively, including digital subscriptions, pay-walls, and premium content offerings.

Bangladesh’s media industry stands at a crossroads. While challenges persist, this is not the end of the road. By addressing existing structural weaknesses and embracing innovation, the industry can transition into a more sustainable and resilient future. With the right policies, data-driven strategies, and a skilled workforce, Bangladesh’s media sector can not only survive but thrive in the digital age.

A robust media landscape is crucial for an informed and democratic society. As the voice of the voiceless, the media plays an indispensable role in shaping public discourse and ensuring accountability. Striking a balance between media houses, advertisers, and agencies is vital to fostering a thriving industry that can contribute meaningfully to Bangladesh’s economic and social development.

Rezaul Hasan is a managing partner at Mindshare Bangladesh.​

 

[Saif]

When the media are considered dispensable

That the media are no longer the primary and dominant source of news is quite understandable. A survey conducted by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics on behalf of the Media Reform Commission to know how people gather news and the source they consider credible has only confirmed the shift in peopl

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

When the media are considered dispensable
Nilratan Halder
Published :
Feb 20, 2025 22:56
Updated :
Feb 20, 2025 22:56

That the media are no longer the primary and dominant source of news is quite understandable. A survey conducted by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics on behalf of the Media Reform Commission to know how people gather news and the source they consider credible has only confirmed the shift in people's choice for sources of news. Instead of relying on traditional media outlets such as newspapers, radio and even television, they prefer cell phones---smartphones in particular---for updating themselves about national and international developments. During national crises or disasters, though, they turn to television, most likely for live coverage of the unfolding events.

It is disheartening that 46 per cent of the selected respondents across social segments felt there was no need for reading newspaper. Against this, 53 per cent felt the same way about television with 54 per cent finding no interest in listening to the radio for news. Printed newspapers have long been losing their grounds to electronic media. But never before has a handy digital device been so versatile to keep its owner connected to the world at large.

The modern trend of short-cut is most likely to have a decisive role to play here. Before asking the audiences the question if they read newspaper or consider this a reliable source of information, they should have been asked if they read books at all; and if they do, how much time they spend on books. The percentage of book readers is increasingly declining because more and more people now consider book reading sheer waste of time. Instant gratification without verification has become the norm. As high as 88 per cent of the participants were found to be reliant on cell phones for keeping them abreast with developments all around.

The level of concentration needed for a post-editorial (article or column in common parlance) or editorial is lacking in the users of social sites. So, the number of discerning newspaper readers is also decreasing. No wonder, facebook and You Tube are the trusted source for 31 per cent and 16.5 per cent respectively. It is exactly at this point, the issue of news literacy has a very important function. Amid multiple sources of news, there is a dearth of verified and authentic reporting on issues, particularly the sensitive ones. Few readers can see through deficient, motivated and distorted news published without in-depth insight and balanced treatment based on versions of stakeholders belonging to opposing camps.

Flawed news consumption thus proves highly dangerous because instead of helping the readers to make informed decision, it can incite violence or social upheaval making a mountain out of a molehill. Newspapers or the media in general are passing a most critical time not only in Bangladesh but also across the globe. When the majority of people think newspapers and radio are dispensable, it is not a question of subscription and revenue but also of a national habit and culture. A rich vein of interaction and communication is behind the development of such a tradition and culture.

Well, radio may have lost its appeal because the receiving sets are almost out of market together with the inconvenience of moving knobs to chosen stations. Then the cell phone can be used as an alternative to such sets. Television creates instant news hardly ever furnishing in-depth analysis. This is why TV channels arrange for talk shows. So, the newspapers have the opportunity to carry the banner of projecting views and analysis in a dispassionate manner, provided that the media are free to do so. In countries where journalists have to self-censor themselves under hostile regimes, maintaining objectivity is always a challenge. Bangladesh has never been an exception to this rule, not even now.

The year 2024 was the worst year for journalists. In Bangladesh it was like walking a tightrope for them. Several newspapers and other media outlets faltered because their inhibition got the better of acceptance of the unprecedented change that was about to sweep away everything on its way like the great deluge. Not only news literacy but also a high level of cultural attainment is a sine qua non for preserving democratic values, human rights and freedom of the Press. Both society and the media grow together forging a symbiotic relationship. But today's world is not an ideal place for fostering such relations.

Crafty and intriguing use of digital devices have put into the most important seats of power political minnows or jokers who have agenda inimical to the prosperity of the human civilisation. The highest global organisation, United Nations (UN) has been turned irrelevant to the distress of humanity across swathes of the planet. Genocide and destruction of villages, towns and human settlements go on almost unchallenged, undermining in the process the rule of law and democratic principles everywhere. The big powers use smaller and poor countries as their stooges or playthings.

Thus economic independence of such nations is lost in favour of their status as vassal states where the big players install their chosen people in power. Thus dictators are created and after a certain period, public sentiment grows. The media can only play the role of a commentator to stay afloat hardly ever creating public opinion in favour of peace and national stability. In murky politics, the growth of powerful media becomes ever more challenging.​

 

[Saif]

A new reality for free media

Sadly, some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

www.thedailystar.net

A new reality for free media
We must learn from the past

VISUAL: SALMAN SAKIB SHAHRYAR

Before, when we spoke the truth, we were countered by the state and its agencies. Now, when we speak the truth, we are countered not by the state, but by lies, accusations without any proof, and tagging on the basis of hate narratives. Outrageous accusations are being made against legacy media without any evidence. In rare cases, when examples are cited, they are either false, taken out of context, distorted, or twisted to suit a predetermined goal. Thus, the media today is facing a new challenge in the post-truth era with an audience that is not used to such falsehood, half-truths and distortions, and as such is being victimised and misled.

I am heartened by a recent comment by the chief adviser's press secretary, Shafiqul Alam, for his emphatic assertion of the need for a free media for a country's advancement. He also stressed the necessity to examine the media's role in distorting objective journalism and upholding the fascistic policy and governance structure of the past regime. He repeatedly stressed that power must always be held to account, and invited all media outlets to scrutinise his own government's performance in the spirit of total independence and professionalism.

We would like to commend him for his stance and focus on two aspects of his remarks: the need to examine our past, and to chalk out a path for the media's unfettered and independent future journey.

As for the past, it is true that most newspapers did not challenge the dictatorial regime of Sheikh Hasina during her rule of over 15 years. They either vigorously supported it or hid the truth, deflected issues that deserved criticism, or distorted facts so that the public wouldn't feel negative about the regime.

There were a few of us who defied all threats—both public and undercover—and carried on speaking truth to power. In the case of this newspaper, the antagonism burst into fury when we invited Prof Muhammad Yunus as chief guest at our 25th anniversary celebration in 2016. In the presence of thousands of invited guests, including 22 editors from South and Southeast Asia, a drama was enacted by several Awami League (AL) ministers who publicly staged a walkout, shouting condemnatory remarks, accusing this writer of having insulted them when Prof Yunus appeared on the stage to deliver the keynote speech. This newspaper was accused of "launching" (whatever that meant) Prof Yunus and giving him a huge national and international platform to work against the Hasina government. (Given her venomous remarks, relentless personal attacks, and fictitious cases against Yunus ever since, one can understand her fury against this newspaper and its editor.) From then on, we were her declared "enemy," and she treated us as such. The avalanche of cases started within hours of that event using my remark on a TV show as a pretext.

This newspaper's editor was charged in 84 cases, 16 of which were for sedition. Several times on the floor of parliament, the former prime minister termed The Daily Star and Prothom Alo "anti-state," "anti-Awami League," and "anti-people." Many AL MPs castigated this newspaper in parliament, accusing us of "indulging" in all sorts of "conspiracies." Even some non-AL MPs joined the castigation, demanding the closure of this newspaper and jailing of its editor. On one occasion, the former prime minister spoke for 21 minutes in parliament denigrating this newspaper's editor, casting doubt on his role as a freedom fighter and raising all sorts of false questions against him. A few years later, during the opening of the Padma Bridge, she falsely accused this writer of travelling to the US and meeting high-level State Department officials and the World Bank president to lobby for the cancellation of the WB loan, as part of Prof Yunus's alleged "efforts" (totally false) to scuttle the Padma Bridge project. For nearly 15 years, we were never allowed to attend the former prime minister's press conferences or any of her functions. We were never allowed to cover her foreign trips or ask her questions as the head of the government. Over time, all her ministers, save one or two, started to avoid us, not allowing our reporters to talk to them and speaking against us whenever the occasion permitted. And all this while some 40 national and international businesses were asked not to give us any advertisement, abruptly reducing our revenue by 40 percent. This continued till the July uprising last year.

We are proud to say that The Daily Star never buckled, thanks to our staff, our board of directors, and the leadership.

The CA's press secretary also laid emphasis on examining not only the past, but also how media covered the events of July-August 2024, now popularly called the Monsoon Revolution. We welcome this decision and thank him for his praise that some media, in spite of severe threats, published prominently the number of students and general people being killed daily.

We also need to examine the politicisation of journalist unions. A special focus should be given on the role of the owners of media houses who used their outlets to eulogise the Hasina government for business purposes, get illegal bank loans, get lucrative contracts, retain untaxed profits, and indulge in money laundering. When directed by the owners, working journalists did not have much of a choice. We think the editors should have tried to prevent that—and failing that, they should have resigned.

Against all the laudable things that are being said about the freedom of media and the present opportunity to engage in independent journalism, we are sad to say that some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

As of November 2024, as many as 140 journalists have been accused of murder and cases have been filed against them on the basis of their reporting of the student-led mass uprising. Twenty eight journalists have been charged with crime against humanity. We strongly feel that the interim government's treatment of journalists has been sweeping, denigrating, and devoid of the sensitivity that this profession deserves. At this moment, we have the highest number of "murder-accused" journalists in the world. In this situation, how likely is it that the world will believe this government is handling the media fairly? Whatever criticism that this government has so far received from world bodies—Human Rights Watch (HRW), Committee for the Protection of Journalists (CPJ), Reporters without Borders (RSF)—has mostly been for the way journalists are being treated.

It has been several months since the cases against journalists were filed. We know of no progress in terms of verification of the accusations. An eight-member committee by the interim government was formed to monitor harassment cases against journalists on October 27. No progress on this account has been reported till now. All this, while the accused journalists are unable to do their regular jobs, take care of their families, and in some cases pay for their children's education. They are also suffering from social humiliation and leading a life of constant fear, lest they be arrested. For any criminal or unethical action, a journalist must face the law as any other citizen. But everyone must be guaranteed the due process under the law, which is their constitutional right.

We appeal to the interim government, given all their professed commitment to free and independent media, to take an immediate look into the cases against journalists and bring them to an accepted legal standard.

Mahfuz Anam is the editor and publisher of The Daily Star.​

 

[Saif]

Law adviser urges journalists to publish news for public interests

Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Adviser Prof Dr Asif Nazrul has called upon the journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad to publish news for public interests. “Journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad can publish news based on Rules of Procedures for public interest since they used to g

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Law adviser urges journalists to publish news for public interests
BSS
Published :
Feb 23, 2025 17:48
Updated :
Feb 23, 2025 17:48

Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Adviser Prof Dr Asif Nazrul has called upon the journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad to publish news for public interests.

“Journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad can publish news based on Rules of Procedures for public interest since they used to get them involved in searching news relating to parliament affairs,” he said.

The law adviser made the remarks when a delegation of Bangladesh Parliament Journalists' Association (BPJA) paid a courtesy call on him at his Bangladesh Secretariat office on Sunday.

Noting that effective parliament is the key to democracy, Prof Asif Nazrul advised the journalist leaders to hold view-exchange-meetings and discussions with the political parties on regular basis.

The law adviser enquired about the journalists’ overall activities in the parliament.

BJPA President Harun Jamil and General Secretary Shawkat Ali Litho led the delegation.

Besides, Vice-President Faiz Ullah Bhuiyan, Joint Secretary Mizanur Rahman, Finance Secretary Md Shahjahan Mollah, Office Secretary Nazmul Islam (Tanim Ahmed) and Executive Members - Mashiur Rahman, Monirul Islam and Rafiqul Islam Sabuj were also present on the occasion.

During the meeting, the BPJA leaders said journalists are performing their professional duties for the future of democracy.

The adviser gave a patient hearing to the problems of journalists working in the parliament and assured them of resolving those problems as the best possible time.​

 

[Saif]

Fallen govt destroyed journalism in Bangladesh: Kader Gani Chowdhury

Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists (BFUJ) Secretary General Kader Gani Chowdhury on Tuesday said that the fallen government, i.e. the one led by the Awami League till August 5 last year, has severely damaged journalism in Bangladesh. He said that a certain group of subservient journalist

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Fallen govt destroyed journalism in Bangladesh: Kader Gani Chowdhury
UNB
Published :
Mar 04, 2025 22:19
Updated :
Mar 04, 2025 22:19

Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists (BFUJ) Secretary General Kader Gani Chowdhury on Tuesday said that the fallen government, i.e. the one led by the Awami League till August 5 last year, has severely damaged journalism in Bangladesh.

He said that a certain group of subservient journalists had been created to write false narratives, which has eroded public trust in the media.

"Trust in the media must be restored through truthful journalism. The media is considered the fourth pillar of the state, highlighting its significance and role. It serves as a vigilant guardian by exposing inconsistencies in governance and administration while standing alongside the people's struggles. However, in Bangladesh today, this is hardly happening," he said while exchanging views with journalists at the Khulna Press Club.

He emphasised that journalism faces many challenges, with the greatest being the battle to uphold truth against falsehood, adding, "Risks in journalism will always exist. Overcoming fear is a journalist's duty. However, unethical and yellow journalism is tarnishing the profession's dignity."

Kader Gani further said, "We must remember that the media acts as the state's watchdog. It is not an adversary of the government, administration, or people, but rather a monitor in the public interest."

He mentioned that a bold and robust media is essential for establishing a strong governance system. Even if the other three pillars of the state weaken, a strong fourth pillar can keep the state people-oriented, he added.

The discussion was attended by BFUJ Assistant Secretary General Ehteshamul Haque Shaon, HM Alanuddin, Rashidul Islam, Abdur Razzak Rana, Metropolitan Journalists' Union Khulna President Anisuzzaman, General Secretary Himalaya, and others.​

 

[Saif]

Article 19 urges govt to protect journalists, amend repressive laws

In a statement issued yesterday, Article 19 said Bangladesh’s media landscape faces significant challenges

www.thedailystar.net

Article 19 urges govt to protect journalists, amend repressive laws

Article 19 has called for the government to protect and offer legal support for journalists as well as review and amend repressive laws to ensure the freedom of expression, media freedom, and the safety of journalists.

It also suggested that the government guarantees adequate salaries and benefits for journalists, as these adversely affect the journalists' professional standards.

Article 19, an international human rights organisation, made the recommendations to the Bangladesh Media Reform Commission on February 23, 2025, highlighting necessary legal and policy reforms.

In a statement issued yesterday, Article 19 said Bangladesh's media landscape, though diverse, faces significant challenges due to the lack of legal protections for journalists, media ownership influenced by political affiliations, and high levels of self-censorship.

It called on the interim government to review and amend repressive laws in accordance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

The laws that require review and amendments include the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898; The Bangladesh Television Authority Act 2001, the Telegraph Act 1885 and the Wireless Telegraph Act 1933, the Official Secrets Act 1923, the Censorship of Films Act 1963, the Right to Information Act 2009; the Cyber Security Act 2023, the Printing Presses and Publications (Declaration and Registration) Act 1973.

It also suggested amending the Penal Code 1860, the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Act 2006, Draft Data Protection Act 2025, draft National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2024, the Post Office Act 1869, the Foreign Relations Act 1932, the Special Powers Act 1974, the Prohibition of Indecent Advertisement Act 1963, the Code of Civil Procedure 1909, the Contempt of Court Act 2013 and the Press Council Act 1974.

These acts grant authorities the power to ban or close newspapers and other publications on grounds of defamation, sedition, acts against sovereignty and decency, among others, provide authorities with strict control over TV broadcasting, grant control over the flow of information, put restrictions on journalists – especially those working on public interest issues and even allows surveillance of online activities, and strict control on what information and opinions can be published online

The rights body said journalists' professional standards are being adversely affected by inadequate salaries and benefits.

"It is essential for the government to coordinate with media owners to establish a fair salary structure, secure working conditions, healthcare, retirement benefits, and workplace safety to encourage journalists to work responsibly."

Article 19 said it is crucial that the government create effective mechanisms for legal action against attacks and threats to journalists, as well as to stop false and harassing lawsuits, so they can continue their work independently and without fear.

It called for the government to initiate a national action plan to ensure the safety of female journalists in Bangladesh, in line with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security.

"The government must ensure the free flow of information by avoiding internet shutdowns, content blocking, and filtering, so that citizens' right to internet freedom and access to information is protected."

Article 19 has urged the government to act on these recommendations and foster a media environment that upholds democracy, transparency, and human rights.​

 

[Saif]

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Shafiqul Alam

www.thedailystar.net

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam
Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary says media houses which cannot pay that much should shut operations

Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday.

"Journalists should have a minimum basic salary between Tk 30,000 and Tk 40,000. It can't be less. Whoever pays below it should shut their business," he said at a discussion organised by Multimedia Reporters Association at the National Press Club.

He said journalism has become a bloodsucking industry in Bangladesh. There are many instances that the media owners don't pay journalists properly for years.

"There should be a new movement to increase the salaries of journalists," he said.

"Those who do journalism should be given intellectual property rights and rightly evaluated," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said there was no real media freedom in Bangladesh during the regime of Sheikh Hasina and many journalists played fearless journalism.

"If there are fearless journalists in Bangladesh, they are multimedia journalists and photojournalists. Their contribution to this movement is memorable, but they don't get due recognition," he said.

Those who are very close to the owners or the editors get good salaries, and most other journalists don't get a fair salary. In some cases, it is even between Tk 5,000 and Tk 10,000 a month, he said.

"In the cases of journalists in the countryside, they get very small amount of salary. You are using their videos and earning out of them, but not paying even Tk 500 to them," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said journalists do hazardous job. A few journalists were martyred during the July uprising and a few dozens were injured. They are considered conscience of the society but are not paid properly.

Many of the owners paying poorly to the journalists speak aloud as civil society members Dhaka, which he said, is an irony.

Journalists come to the profession for their passion, but the owners exploit that, he said.

He advocated a movement anew, and blamed the journalist unions for failure, saying that RMG workers are not as educated as journalists are, but they are far better in union activism. They fight for their minimum wage, which is great.

"We are considered conscience of the society, but for decades we remain victims of injustice. Yet, we are not raising our voice for our rights."​

 

[Bilal9]

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Shafiqul Alam

www.thedailystar.net

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam
Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary says media houses which cannot pay that much should shut operations

View attachment 15396
Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday.

"Journalists should have a minimum basic salary between Tk 30,000 and Tk 40,000. It can't be less. Whoever pays below it should shut their business," he said at a discussion organised by Multimedia Reporters Association at the National Press Club.

He said journalism has become a bloodsucking industry in Bangladesh. There are many instances that the media owners don't pay journalists properly for years.

"There should be a new movement to increase the salaries of journalists," he said.

"Those who do journalism should be given intellectual property rights and rightly evaluated," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said there was no real media freedom in Bangladesh during the regime of Sheikh Hasina and many journalists played fearless journalism.

"If there are fearless journalists in Bangladesh, they are multimedia journalists and photojournalists. Their contribution to this movement is memorable, but they don't get due recognition," he said.

Those who are very close to the owners or the editors get good salaries, and most other journalists don't get a fair salary. In some cases, it is even between Tk 5,000 and Tk 10,000 a month, he said.

"In the cases of journalists in the countryside, they get very small amount of salary. You are using their videos and earning out of them, but not paying even Tk 500 to them," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said journalists do hazardous job. A few journalists were martyred during the July uprising and a few dozens were injured. They are considered conscience of the society but are not paid properly.

Many of the owners paying poorly to the journalists speak aloud as civil society members Dhaka, which he said, is an irony.

Journalists come to the profession for their passion, but the owners exploit that, he said.

He advocated a movement anew, and blamed the journalist unions for failure, saying that RMG workers are not as educated as journalists are, but they are far better in union activism. They fight for their minimum wage, which is great.

"We are considered conscience of the society, but for decades we remain victims of injustice. Yet, we are not raising our voice for our rights."​

I like this, it will attract better qualified and educated people to the Journalist profession by raising competition.

Remember that guy in CTG - Komol Dey, who couldn't even pronounce Bangla properly, and was screaming all the time. He became a meme of sorts in Bangladesh media.