[🇧🇩] Press Freedom in Bangladesh

[Saif]

Date of Event: Nov 13, 2024

Source : https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/interviews/news/external-forces-must-not-interfere-the-media-3750551 Short Summary: Tracking activities of various sections in Bangladesh to influence press freedom.

External forces must not interfere with the media

Dr Iftekharuzzaman, executive director of Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB), talks about the current state of press freedom in the country, recent attempts by certain groups to suppress some media outlets, and the potential way out of the situation with Naznin Tithi of The Daily Star.

Why is the media still unable to operate freely following the political change in the country, despite repeated commitments from the interim government to ensure press freedom?

Let's remember the background of the anti-discrimination movement, which initially began as a quota reform movement seeking justice in public sector recruitment. The underlying factors behind this movement, however, were multi-dimensional and deeply rooted in institutionalised discrimination across all aspects of life and society, shaped by years of authoritarian rule. The student-led movement was soon joined by the broader public, rallying under the main slogan against all forms of discrimination. On August 5, the authoritarian regime fell. But this does not necessarily mean that we have achieved a discrimination-free Bangladesh, nor can we expect the deep-rooted discriminatory structures and practices to be transformed in the short term.

The people's dream for a "new Bangladesh" includes restructuring the state and establishing a new social and political order, with a clear stance against all forms of discrimination. While the government, the movement itself, and other stakeholders are clearly committed to realising this vision, what we are observing post-August 5 is that various groups, considering themselves victors—whether as direct participants, supporters, or opportunists—do not all share the same understanding or vision of a discrimination-free society. This divergence is now manifesting in different ways.

What reforms does the media need in Bangladesh?

The diversity of our society—in terms of gender, religion, culture, ethnicity, etc—is under severe stress as some groups feel newly entitled to impose parochial agendas. Using labels like "collaborators" or "co-opted beneficiaries" of the previous authoritarian regime, these forces now consider themselves empowered—sometimes excessively so—to impose their own agendas, which are not necessarily aligned with the anti-discrimination movement's spirit.

The media has become one of the targets of these groups, which are now trying to impose their own interpretations of media freedom onto others. Certain sections of the media that have played a very supportive role in the whole movement, advocated for a diverse and inclusive society, and have been consistent with the anti-discriminatory spirit are now being selectively targeted. Media freedom is being subjected to campaigns by forces whose basic conceptualisation, indoctrination, and ways of imposing agendas are discriminatory at their core, which is deeply troubling.

Nevertheless, we cannot ignore the factors that contributed to the transformation of an originally democratically elected regime in 2008 into a draconian authoritarian one. It was designed to monopolise political and governance space and to capture state and non-state institutions to create a superstructure perceived to maintain power indefinitely, without accountability. This setup enabled abuse of power, corruption, and the criminalisation of politics with impunity. It is also a fact that the media was among the institutions targeted for capture and control. As a result, some segments of the media struggled to navigate state-sponsored controls and conspiracies while striving for independence and professionalism, though often at the cost of reluctant self-censorship. On the other hand, many media outlets allowed themselves to be co-opted, benefiting from and even becoming components of the authoritarian superstructure. While no one should condone such collaborators or facilitators of the previous regime, indiscriminately victimising the entire media or launching targeted attacks on select outlets for what occurred under authoritarian rule is unacceptable.

How would you explain the recent attempts by certain groups to silence the media or the mob mentality directed against journalists and specific media outlets? What role has the government played in stopping this?

The interim government has repeatedly stated its commitment to a free press. When the chief adviser met with newspaper editors, he encouraged them to be critical and objective in identifying the government's failures. From the government's side, we have not seen anything detrimental to media freedom, except for the recent indiscriminate cancellation of accreditation of a large number of journalists.

When agitations took place against some of the leading media houses, the government provided them support and resisted such moves. However, certain groups who find themselves to be over-empowered—who may or may not have participated in the movement—continue to act as if it is their time to impose their own agenda to target media that is not in their liking for their own reason. While the government has successfully prevented worse outcomes, there is no guarantee that these forces have been fully controlled or managed to the extent that such indoctrinated groups won't strike back. So, the government must be vigilant to safeguard media freedom. History is replete with examples that failure to ensure free media can only be self-defeating.

Mob justice is the manifestation or a weapon these forces are using. And the media has obviously become one of the targets. However, this is not the first time that it has been used. Mob justice has taken place in other contexts as well since August 5. This is also not unusual in the context of such a huge popular uprising against a deep-rooted authoritarian regime. Many people would consider it normal because people have deep-rooted sentiments against the former regime. People have strong emotions against those who are in any manner considered to be associated with or part of the authoritarian regime and those who facilitated the ruthless killings, tortures, all kinds of discrimination and violation of fundamental rights. Mob justice is the outburst of that emotion of people against such grievances. But there is a limit to it and the government must strategically address and manage it in due process through effective communication.

Incidentally, the two most prominent media houses in the country, which are under attack now, were directly victimised in the worst possible way by the authoritarian regime. They were blacklisted from any government programmes or press conferences and deprived of government advertisements. It is no secret that they were consistent targets of manipulation, harassment, and intimidation by the intelligence agencies, the main powerbase of the previous regime. Both houses had to endure a series of politically motivated cases due to their role as free media. Their fate symbolised the criminalisation of free media driven by a hunger for power. Despite this, they survived the challenging situation without compromising their commitment to upholding the spirit of a free press. Whether they are targeted in the "new Bangladesh" because of their alleged "linkage" with India or the previous regime, or for upholding the spirit of a free press, is anyone's guess.

VISUAL: ANWAR SOHEL

The interim government has announced plans to repeal the Cyber Security Act (CSA). How do you view this development?

It was the right decision and an expected one. There was widespread demand for this from the public, and the civil society and the media played a role in advocating for its repeal. Here, I would like to mention a number of things that should be done. The government should immediately undertake a comprehensive programme of duly compensating the victims of this draconian law and their families and rehabilitate them professionally, psychologically, and socially. Secondly, they should withdraw all the ongoing cases, although there is a legal issue in that. But if the government is willing, there can be ways of addressing the issue. Thirdly, in the present global context, there is no other option but to have a Cyber Security Act. But while drafting the new cyber security law, they should be able to take the right lessons from the DSA and the CSA. It has to be drafted through a fully participatory process, involving all stakeholders, including experts and professionals on cyber security. Plus, whoever is drafting this law must remember that it is not meant to control or dictate terms of freedom of expression or media freedom on cyber platforms—the Internet system, social media, and other digital platforms. The purpose of this law should be restricted to ensuring the safety and security of users on the Internet and the digital sphere. But any form of control of free expression, dissent, free speech, or free media should be outside the new law's scope.

Also, the names such as the Cyber Security Act or the Digital Security Act should not be used anymore. These names have created an atmosphere of intimidation, a sense of insecurity in society. The new law can be called something like the Internet Safety Act. Finally, since the government is the largest user and worst possible abuser of the Internet and digital system as per track record, to avoid conflict of interest, the authority to be created to oversee the implementation of this new law must be an independent body outside the control of the government.

The government has established a media reform commission. What types of media reforms are needed in this changed political climate and how can the media in Bangladesh regain public trust?

First of all, media as a fourth estate must be committed to upholding the fundamental principles of media ethics and integrity. The media as an institution cannot and does not need to be controlled by external forces. But in Bangladesh, we have seen that the media has been subjected to government control motivated by partisan political bias or influence for which draconian laws and state institutions including intelligence agencies were used. One of the tools used against media was divide and rule and cooption. As a result, while a few media houses may have their own integrity and ethical standards and practices, there has always been a lack of efforts on part of the media as a sector to develop and uphold the basic principles of independent and ethical journalism, or professional integrity among media personnel. I think now the media houses should try to sit together in the spirit of a new Bangladesh. They should themselves create a media code of ethics, ethics structures and implementation roadmaps. There must be mechanisms for the media to self-regulate and work transparently and accountably, maintaining professional integrity without external influence, political or otherwise. There has to be some serious system of sectoral oversight rather than anything coming from outside.

Secondly, like anywhere else in the world, media houses here are also essentially business entities. That's part of the reality. Nevertheless, there are good global practices. The capacity of the investors to differentiate between business interests and media freedom is very important. To instil this ideal into the media houses, their investors and media leaders, relevant professionals and experts should come together to make their own policies. However, no matter how much we talk about media reforms, unless and until there is a paradigm shift in the culture and practices of our politics and bureaucracy, which remain hostage to a media control mindset, changes will not happen.

Thirdly, media organisations must ensure that journalists and reporters are properly compensated and protected, with adequate job security and safety from all risks associated with the discharge of their professional duties. Many journalists are underpaid or irregularly paid, which must change for the media to maintain integrity.

Media, unlike most other institutions, have to be accountable to its constituency—the readers and viewers—every day, and in fact, every moment. Therefore, to survive credibly it must develop its own inbuilt system of ethics and integrity. No freedom is unlimited or unaccountable, but in the case of media, the limit to freedom and the process of accountability must be defined and ensured by the media itself within its constitutional mandate.​

 

[Saif]

Government must make itself available to questions from the press

Bangladesh needs a properly resourced and responsive IG press office, one that regards its audience as the nation and not the elite.

www.thedailystar.net

Government must make itself available to questions from the press

Visual: Aliza Rahman

I am mindful of the risk that criticism even from a friend keen to see the interim government (IG) succeed could be misrepresented by those who would rather the IG failed. Such people will find nothing in the following to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the IG. Rather, the remarks here are offered in the spirit of constructive advice with a view to helping the IG accomplish its goals.

Democratic governments are held accountable by popular elections, parliamentary scrutiny, and the review of independent institutions such as the courts. Beyond such features, one is hard pressed to find any practice of democracy that does not include the rigours of a vibrant, free press.

At the time of writing this, there are only three members of staff in the press office of the chief adviser. The office's woeful under-resourcing alone, rather than failures of staff, could explain its shortcomings.

Instead of acting as a passive conduit for government bulletins, a press office should take the initiative on communications, anticipating needs and acting accordingly. Consider the IG's announcement on September 17 to grant temporary magistracy powers to the military. Without reasons for such a grant of powers, the announcement naturally raised concerns. The home affairs adviser did subsequently provide further explanation in a speech to new army recruits, but that came two days after news media had reported the story and damage had been done.

Examples of "small" avoidable errors are plentiful; their impact cumulatively, however, is far from small. Here is another example. After first supporting the IG's resolve to reform the constitution, BNP leadership was reported to say, on September 22, that reforms should take place only under an elected government. This came after earlier reported claims that the public would not tolerate an IG staying in place for too long. The press office should have grasped the significance of the BNP statement, not least as a test of the traction that calls for elections might enjoy. A press office with initiative would quickly have landed on a readily available response to provide journalists. With the law adviser's help, the office could have drafted something along such lines as: "The IG shares the BNP's concern for democratic endorsement of a constitution. Constitutions, everywhere, are typically approved by constitutional assemblies and ratified by parliaments. The IG respects the need for the people, directly or through elected representatives, to ratify a constitution." Such a response would not have bound the IG and, moreover, it would have sent a cautionary signal to all those who would call for elections prematurely. As a bonus, it would have reframed the BNP's own statement.

Perhaps the press office's shortcomings are most vividly illustrated by the CA's recent interview with Voice of America and the subsequent furore. Though first reported on October 3, the interview itself took place on September 27. Presumably, a press officer was present (and made a separate recording), as should be the case at all media interviews.

After referencing the destruction of Bangabandhu Memorial Museum and the cancellation of the national day of mourning, while further noting that Sheikh Mujib had long been recognised as the father of the nation, the interviewer asked "What's the viewpoint of your IG?"

To say that the CA's answer was regrettable is hardly controversial. In hindsight, I imagine he wishes he had worded things differently. His reply was: "You're talking about the past. Apparently, you don't remember that a mass uprising has since taken place. You're speaking as if it never happened. You need to see what's happening in this new situation. You do not seem to have any questions about how many students have sacrificed their lives, why they sacrificed their lives. First, we must admit that they, the students, said that we have pushed a reset button. The past is gone for sure. Now we will build up in new way. People also want that. And this new way means we must bring reforms."

What gave rise to controversy, specifically, were the words "...we have pushed a reset button. The past is gone for sure." My own view is that the CA did not intend to be understood as promoting revisionist history or Stalinist photographic airbrushing of a persona newly deemed non gratis. But it is unreasonable to expect everyone to read his words as I did: on its face, the text is indeed troubling.

Moreover, the controversial words aside, the rest of the CA's response to the question reflects a lack of having been prepared by his press team. His tone is defensive, bordering on belligerent, which does not look good at all. My attention here is not on what the CA said but on what the press office failed to do both beforehand and afterward. Professor Yunus is not a seasoned politician emerging from the trials of political interviews over long years. He is an academic. His team should have warned him that, although he will be celebrated by leaders gathered in New York for the UN general assembly, he should not expect an easy ride in every press interview. They should have cautioned him that criticising a journalist for the choice of questions leaves the impression of someone defensive and unfamiliar with accountability. Under the old regime, of course, Awami League politicians all but wrote the questions put to them at press conferences. But that is not the case wherever there is a free press—choice of questions is the interviewer's prerogative.

Equally important, the team should have primed the CA on the cardinal rule of political interviews—do not answer a question, when it is wise not to do so, but instead pivot to your own talking point. And it is never wise to answer a question that has raised your ire and made you feel defensive, in the way the question quite evidently had Professor Yunus. His own closing words indicate what the focus of his answer should have been: "...we must bring reforms."

No doubt other things were also at play. For instance, we all recognise a prevailing culture of deference towards "superiors," that inhibits constructive criticism, including in private, which, in turn, leaves people in leadership positions unaccustomed to awkward questions.

A competent communications staffer present at the interview would spot right away that the CA's answer to that one question could well cause problems. The press team should have anticipated the likelihood of a social media outcry, with a response at the ready, if required upon the interview's publication a week later. Instead, it took another seven days following publication for the team to react on October 11. Even then, it did so by releasing a written statement rather than through a press conference, where, by fielding questions, it might have hoped to put matters to rest, not just in the media but in people's minds. None of this is how a serious communications operation is run.

The press office has several functions for which it must be adequately staffed. Clearly, it must guide senior IG officials on how to field questions. More generally, it must anticipate reactions to its own announcements; it must be fleet of foot; it must enlist any part of the IG necessary to inform a response to news and events; and it must have the weight of the CA behind it to promptly receive whatever input it needs from others in the IG.

But there is another critical function, one the press team has yet to serve with enough regularity or effectiveness, a function that brings into focus the unique nature of this administration. As discussed above, there is no doubt the IG has a clear mandate. But a mandate does not constitute accountability. And, in the justifiable absence of parliament, there are scarcely any sources of public accountability aside from the press. The press office should be holding press conferences, taking questions from journalists regularly and frequently, even daily—why not? There is no shame in not having answers always at hand; when necessary, answers can be provided later. But the press has to be respected as an institution by which the government is held accountable by the people. Until elections are called and parliament restored, it is arguably the only such institution.

This insight has another important consequence, to which I now turn. As was to be expected, August saw a flurry of media reports of advisers making bold and broad statements of principle—how this or that practice must stop. But lofty platitudes have continued into October amid an endless merry-go-round of roundtables and conferences, with senior IG figures all too often in attendance. One can be forgiven for wondering if some in the IG have failed to grasp a simple fact: they have ceased to be civil society campaigners making demands of the government; in fact, they are the government.

Most of the advisers are drawn from the NGO or academic sectors, where conferences and roundtables are routine. Such roundtables have a virtue in attracting news media for the purpose of legitimate advocacy work. But governments do not need roundtables to attract attention. Moreover, it should be apparent to anyone who's attended any—and, God forgive me, I have attended too many—roundtables hardly ever yield new insights.

Too much of what we hear about government decision-making is through news reports of roundtables. Even if the government were elected, this would be undemocratic, but it is all the more so given that the IG is not elected, and since such forums are invariably gatherings of the Dhaka elite, who are all too often found at the same dinner parties and weddings.

Governing is about getting things done practically and is not the same as NGO advocacy. Advisers should attend roundtables judiciously, turning instead to press conferences and fielding questions from journalists. Press conferences are the right forum for announcing developments in government policy.

One notes, by the way, that where press conferences are routinely held, with press officers taking questions, news media will put their best journalists on the beat, for the obvious reason that good questions will yield material worth reporting. And this, incidentally, will raise the standard of accountability. Accountability is not to be feared but embraced. It makes each of us better, as well as being better for those to whom we are accountable. Besides, shouldn't we act like the change we want to see? If the IG wants governments to be accountable, it can act now.

Roundtables can go ahead but without advisers, and conveners can make written submissions to the IG, with the benefit of discussions already in hand. Advisers and other government officials must be freed from the terrible time-sink of these roundtables. If I mention Dhaka's horrifying perpetual traffic jam and the hours it takes to travel to and from any venue, it is to underline the fact that time is a precious commodity depleting by the day, and especially precious to an IG with an indeterminate future.

Bangladesh needs a properly resourced and responsive IG press office, one that regards its audience as the nation and not the elite. Making itself routinely answerable to a free press is the pre-eminent means, until elections, by which the government can deliver effective accountability. Without accountability, we will all, in time, inevitably wonder: what the heck is the government actually doing? The cumulative effect of inadequate announcements and infrequent press conferences, where questions are taken, will be the draining of trust and faith, and growing doubt in the IG's capacity to deliver. There is still time to fix all this. But how much time is anyone's guess.

Zia Haider Rahman, a former international human rights lawyer and head of research at Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB), is the author of the novel "In the Light of What We Know."​

 

[Saif]

Press freedom faces serious attack: Noab

The Newspaper Owners’ Association of Bangladesh (Noab) yesterday expressed concern over continued attacks on the freedom of the media.

www.thedailystar.net

Press freedom faces serious attack: Noab

The Newspaper Owners' Association of Bangladesh (Noab) yesterday expressed concern over continued attacks on the freedom of the media.

Strongly condemning the recent sit-ins, attacks, and vandalism in front of the Prothom Alo and The Daily Star offices, Noab said such attempts to "create chaos" were disrupting the practice and environment of journalism.

"If anyone has objections to any news or the editorial policy of a particular newspaper, they can clarify their intellectual stance and views through writing," Noab said in a media statement, signed by its President AK Azad.

According to the statement, some individuals over the last few days attempted to create chaos by taking position on the road in front of the Prothom Alo's main office in the capital's Karwan Bazar.

"Later, law enforcers dispersed those individuals. However, such activities continued yesterday [Sunday] as well."

The association called upon the government to take stern action against mob justice that targeted different institutions, including media outlets.

It also urged all the parties concerned to refrain from activities that are contrary to the freedom of the media.​

 

[Saif]

Won’t tolerate attack on media

The government will not stand for the vandalism of any newspaper office or the shut down of any media outlet through the use of force, Information Adviser Nahid Islam has said.

www.thedailystar.net

Won’t tolerate attack on media
Says information adviser

The government will not stand for the vandalism of any newspaper office or the shut down of any media outlet through the use of force, Information Adviser Nahid Islam has said.

"Those involved in vandalising newspaper offices and intimidating the media will be brought to book," he said at a press briefing at the Foreign Service Academy yesterday.

"There was tension regarding the Prothom Alo over the last few days. Tension was created in front of its Dhaka office yesterday [Sunday]. The newspaper's Rajshahi office came under attack today [yesterday]. Besides, demonstrations took place in different parts of the country, including in Chattogram and Brahmanbaria [in this connection]."

A group of people also demonstrated in front of The Daily Star office on Friday.

"Our position is that if a section of people has any complaint about a media outlet, they can express their resentment peacefully. We don't support vandalising any newspaper office or putting pressure on one to shut it.

"We will not tolerate any such incident in the future."

"People have the right to assembly. If anyone has any specific complaint [against a media outlet], they can take legal actions. We call upon the people not to take part in any anarchic activity, and to refrain from doing anything that would taint the image of Bangladesh."

"I condemn with the strongest terms the attack on the Prothom Alo office at Rajshahi. If you have complaints against the journalism of the Prothom Alo, The Daily Star, or any other media outlets, you can go to courts to seek legal redress. You can also hold peaceful protests. Protests against media outlets aren't new. It has been going on for centuries. But threats and intimidation of journalists or attacking media outlets will not be tolerated," he said.

Meanwhile, Bangladeshi Journalists in International Media (BJIM) and the Communist Party of Bangladesh (CPB) have also expressed concerns over recent protests outside the offices of Prothom Alo and The Daily Star, in Dhaka and Chattogram.

BJIM is particularly troubled by the implications for the safety and security of journalists working at Prothom Alo and The Daily Star, according to a press release issued yesterday.

BJIM, an advocacy group for press freedom, urged protesters to express their concerns peacefully and constructively.

"Refrain from actions that could provoke or threaten any members of the press," it stated.

In a separate statement, CPB President Shah Alam and General Secretary Ruhin Hossain Prince condemned the attacks and defamation directed at the two newspapers.

Any interference with freedom of expression will undermine the spirit of the mass uprising, said a press release.

The government cannot evade its responsibility to ensure freedom of expression and maintain law and order, it added.​

 

[Saif]

কোনো পত্রিকা বন্ধে চাপ প্রয়োগ টলারেট করা হবে না: নাহিদ ইসলাম

 

[Saif]

Targeted intimidation of media disconcerting

THE untoward incident of chaos and anarchy in front of the office of the daily Prothom Alo is deeply concerning. As reported in New Age on November 24, a group of individuals, some of them identifying themselves as ‘anti-India protesters,’ staged a sit-in programme in front of the Prothom Alo...

www.newagebd.net

Targeted intimidation of media disconcerting
26 November, 2024, 00:00

THE untoward incident of chaos and anarchy in front of the office of the daily Prothom Alo is deeply concerning. As reported in New Age on November 24, a group of individuals, some of them identifying themselves as ‘anti-India protesters,’ staged a sit-in programme in front of the Prothom Alo office and also tried to block the surrounding roads, including the road to the city’s largest kitchen market in Kawran Bazar. In the evening, when the protesters tried to slaughter a cow and prepare a meal blocking the entryway of the Prothom Alo and obstructing vehicular movement to the kitchen market, police charged batons and lobbed teargas and sound grenades, which left at least 10 protesters injured. A similar sit-in protest was attempted in front of the Daily Star office. On November 22, the protesters similarly demonstrated in front of the Daily Star office. They alleged that India was dominating Bangladesh in various ways, and the newspapers were working as ‘India’s agents.’ It is unfortunate that a 10-year-old boy was injured in the police action, but the protesters’ way of expressing their displeasure with the newspapers is also disconcerting. The protesters relied on physical intimidation, which amounts to an attempt at silencing an opinion that the group does not ideologically approve.

Ideological opposition to a foreign policy or an opinion against an unequal political-economic relationship with the government of a neighbouring country should be raised and debated, and it is all the more important at a time when democratic transformation is high on Bangladesh’s agenda. The protesters claimed to challenge the India appeasement policy that the deposed Awami League government had pursued and alleged that the Prothom Alo and the Daily Star have served the interest of India. However, taking the path of physical intimidation targeting particular media is rather worrying because, by doing so, the protesters appear to have resorted to somewhat similar authoritarian tools that the AL deployed to muzzle opinions critical of their policies. Instead of mobilising public opinion or relying on other civil means to discuss the many issues contributing to the unequal India-Bangladesh relationship, including unresolved transboundary river water sharing with India, the Indian Border Security Force’s unabated border killings, and numerous unfair economic agreements with India, especially in the energy sector, the protesters have created chaos and public nuances in front of the two newspaper offices. Such targeted intimidation of media is absolutely unacceptable, and the group involved in the said protest should give it a second thought.

It is, however, assuring that the government has taken early steps to protect the press, played a proactive role in containing the situation, and the law enforcers exercised relative restraint when dispersing the protesters. The group taking part in the protest denouncing the opinion of the two newspapers ought to reconsider their direct action strategies.​

 

[Saif]

Troublemakers are out to destroy press freedom: Mirza Fakhrul

Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir has said some troublemakers and instigators are making evil attempts to destroy freedom of the press and freedom of expression. “It is very unfortunate that a dangerous matter has begun, which is launching attac

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Troublemakers are out to destroy press freedom: Mirza Fakhrul
BSS
Published :
Nov 26, 2024 20:39
Updated :
Nov 26, 2024 20:55

Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir has said some troublemakers and instigators are making evil attempts to destroy freedom of the press and freedom of expression.

“It is very unfortunate that a dangerous matter has begun, which is launching attack on newspapers and attack on freedom of expression for which we have always struggled and fought,” he said while speaking at a book launching ceremony in a Gulshan hotel in Dhaka on Tuesday.

Fakhrul said: “Today we are witnessing that some troublemakers and instigators have resorted to impede and destroy the freedom of press. Any conscious or patriotic person cannot accept such attempts by any means“.

The BNP secretary general urged all, who are making such attempts, to get rid of this “suicidal path” and extend cooperation to the government to give democracy an institutional shape.

He said the country’s media enjoyed the highest level of freedom during the tenure of BNP from 2001-2006.

A book titled “Tarique Rahman: Politics and Policies Contemporary Bangladesh”, authored by writer, journalist and researcher Mohammad Zainal Abedin, was launched on the event with former Speaker of the Jatiya Sangsad and BNP Standing Committee member Barrister Jamiruddin Sircar in the chair.

About the recent clashes of students in the capital, Mirza Fakhrul urged all to remain patient and extend cooperation to the interim government.

“If the government fails, the revolution and mass uprising will also fail. And again, we will fall in darkness. So, we will have to think positively over these issues,” he said.

Mentioning the remarks of BNP Acting Chairman Tarique Rahman over the reform programme, Fakhrul said BNP is not opposing the reforms. “Reforms must be done.

We want to go for election following minimum required reforms. ” he added.

About why he is repeatedly talking about elections, he said without elections, many problems cannot be resolved and many challenges cannot be faced.

The BNP secretary general said an elected government can face many challenges with people’s mandate.

About the current situation of the country, Fakhrul said: “Today many people are becoming anxious and concern about what is happening in the country. Actually, we have to understand that our enemies, who left from our front but they are creating unrest again in the country from behind the scene. We all will have to remain alert to this end”.

Fakhrul said BNP Chairperson and two-time Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia and her family members, including Acting Chairman Tarique Rahman, had to endure severe and inhumane physical and mental torture since the political changeover of one-eleven as well as during the previous Awami League regime.

Khaleda Zia was sent to jail in false cases during the AL regime while Tarique Rahman was forced to leave the country by giving false cases but they never gave up and bowed down head rather they continued their struggle, he said.

The BNP secretary general said Tarique Rahman has been leading the party with his organizational efficacy and democratic mindset since Begum Zia was sent to jail in false cases.

About maintaining democracy inside the party, he said Tarique Rahman has been holding regular meetings with the party leaders for drawing up programmes of the party and taking any policy decision and maintaining contact with party workers at grassroots, including union level.

It has been possible to oust the Sheikh Hasina’s regime in students-led mass uprising, he said, adding that, “I think Tarique Rahman has the highest contributions to this end. He organized and inspired the nation for long. At the final stage of the mass uprising, he always kept communication with all (stakeholders), even the coordinators.”

Around 422 leaders and activists of Chhatra Dal, Jubo Dal and different other organizations of the party embraced martyrdom during the mass uprising, he mentioned.

About the struggle and sacrifice of BNP during the AL regime, he said 60 lakh leaders and activists faced false cases, 20,000 partymen were killed, over 700 others including BNP MPs became victims of enforced disappearance.

Veteran journalist Shafik Rehman, writer of the book Mohammad Zainal Abedin, Honorary Professor of Department of Oriental Art of Fine Arts Faculty of Dhaka University Dr. Md. Abdus Sattar, Jahangirnagar University Vice-Chancellor Prof Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan, Bangladesh Open University Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic) Dr. Dil Rowshan Zinnat Ara Nazneen and academician Mubashar Hasan, spoke on the occasion, among others.

Senior BNP leaders, academics, civil society figures also joined the event.​

 

[Saif]

RSF condemns attacks on Daily Star, Prothom Alo

The press freedom organisation urged authorities to end such acts of intimidation and work towards rebuilding a safe and pluralistic media environment in the country

www.thedailystar.net

RSF condemns attacks on Daily Star, Prothom Alo

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has strongly condemned attacks on the offices of two prominent independent newspapers in Bangladesh, The Daily Star and Prothom Alo.

The press freedom organisation urged authorities to end such acts of intimidation and work towards rebuilding a safe and pluralistic media environment in the country.

"RSF condemns the unacceptable attacks and attempts of intimidation against The Daily Star and Prothom Alo. The two newspapers tried to maintain their independence at all costs under Sheikh Hasina's authoritarian regime, despite the legal harassment they suffered in retaliation. It is now up to the interim government to help them to work freely, without restrictions or harassment," said Celia Mercier, head of RSF's South Asia Desk.

"An impartial, thorough investigation into the instigators and perpetrators of the recent violent attacks -- and the necessary subsequent legal proceedings -- are crucial to curbing the development of an unsafe work environment for journalists," she added.

In its report, RSF highlighted multiple incidents of violence targeting these newspapers, with coordinated attacks carried out on their headquarters in Dhaka and several regional offices. In Rajshahi, around 200 protestors attempted to storm Prothom Alo's office, vandalising its signboard.

RSF said the attacks are orchestrated by "radicalised anti-India religious groups," who accused the newspapers of being "agents of India and promoting values contrary to Islam.

The attackers issued demands for the newspapers to shut down unless they issued public apologies and retracted their allegedly "anti-Islamic" stances. A concurrent smear campaign on social media further fueled hostility toward the media outlets.

RSF emphasised the urgent need for Bangladesh's interim government to implement reforms to safeguard journalists.​

 

[Saif]

Assaults on media houses deeply alarming

Authorities must act decisively to protect press freedom

www.thedailystar.net

Assaults on media houses deeply alarming
Authorities must act decisively to protect press freedom

VISUAL: STAR

We're deeply concerned about the ongoing threats to press freedom as epitomised by the spate of attacks, vandalism, hostile mobilisations, and inflammatory rhetoric targeting Prothom Alo and The Daily Star. This is a rude awakening for those who expected the culture of intimidation and repression against journalists to recede with the ouster of an autocratic regime—which, over 14 years, saw Bangladesh's position plummet 42 notches on the World Press Freedom Index. Instead, threats to the media appear to be intensifying in the current political climate, with coordinated campaigns aiming to stoke hostility against media houses that have long stood as pillars of independent journalism. This raises troubling questions about the future of the press in Bangladesh.

The campaign against Prothom Alo has been particularly vociferous since October 25, when a group announced plans to lay siege to its head office in Karwan Bazar but failed to mobilise. Later, starting last Thursday, protesters held sit-ins and caused disorder outside the office for several days, prompting law enforcement to intervene. On Monday, two of the paper's regional offices came under attack: masked individuals vandalised its signboard and windows in Bogura, while in Rajshahi, a group attempted to break into its office, destroyed its signboard, and burned copies of Prothom Alo and The Daily Star. Hostile gatherings against both papers were also reported in Chattogram, Sylhet, Barishal, Chandpur, Munshiganj, and at Savar's Jahangirnagar University. On Friday, a group also demonstrated in front of The Daily Star's head office.

While we welcome and indeed look forward to any constructive criticism of the media—which can be a learning experience for journalists—the current campaign, rooted in neither truth nor reason, offers no such opportunity. No credible grievances or evidence have been presented to justify these attacks and disruptions. Instead, they appear driven by an agenda to discredit independent media and deter it from fulfilling its watchdog role, exploiting the fluid security situation. As the Editors' Council and the Newspaper Owners' Association of Bangladesh (Noab) have rightly pointed out, any objections to the news or editorial policy of a newspaper can be expressed constructively, through writing. There are also legal means available to anyone feeling aggrieved. Even peaceful protests are permissible. But intimidation or violence targeting newspapers—and by extension their staff—are not only unacceptable but also a disservice to the democratic aspirations of the July uprising.

We are, however, encouraged by the solidarity shown by various platforms amid ongoing assaults. Government officials, including the information adviser, have also condemned this wave of aggression, vowing to prevent any unlawful activities to silence the media. We hope these assurances will be matched by swift action to create a secure environment for journalists, and that those behind ongoing assaults will be held accountable. The anti-media campaign coincides with the ongoing trend of disruptive activities by various errant groups, highlighting the complex challenges facing the pro-uprising forces. It is, therefore, imperative that civil society, political leaders, and the public stand united in protecting our hard-earned freedoms.​

 

[Saif]

Political parties strongly endorse press freedom

Political parties yesterday expressed their unwavering support for press freedom, highlighting its vital role in strengthening democracy and securing the nation’s future.

www.thedailystar.net

Political parties strongly endorse press freedom
Call for an end to intimidation of the media during talks with Noab

Participants at a views exchange meeting with political leaders on recent attacks on independent journalism and media outlets. The event was organised by the Newspaper Owners Association of Bangladesh at the Sonargaon hotel in Dhaka yesterday. Photo: Rashed Shumon

Political parties yesterday expressed their unwavering support for press freedom, highlighting its vital role in strengthening democracy and securing the nation's future.

They blasted the recent attacks on the press and called for an immediate end to such activities. They also cautioned that if such activities go on, the aspirations of the July uprising would not be fulfilled.

Top leaders of 13 political parties made these remarks at a views-exchange meeting on "Independent Journalism and Media Institutions Under Threat".

The Newspaper Owners' Association of Bangladesh (Noab) organised the programme at the Pan Pacific Sonargaon Hotel.

Speaking at the event, BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir said it is quite unfortunate that he had to discuss press freedom in a free environment after the fall of a fascist regime.

"Over the last 15 years, people, including political activists, had been in constant fear of being sued or landing in jail for writing in newspapers or speaking out. It is unfortunate that even after a mass uprising, attacks on media outlets remain a concern," he said.

He said the BNP always fought for freedom of speech, right to vote, and democracy.

"Some people are attempting to divide the people. Certain remarks are being made that could lead to complete anarchy. Together, we must stop this; or else, the sacrifices of the students and the masses will go in vain."

Fakhrul pointed out that certain actions lead to depoliticisation at times, which must be consciously avoided. He said that an elected government is the best option, but imposing control on it or on democracy is unacceptable.

"Creating anarchy or acting recklessly would lead the nation towards the gravest danger."

Urging caution, he warned against taking actions that could allow the ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina to manipulate incidents from abroad and this would ultimately spoil the opportunity to rebuild the nation.

He reaffirmed his party's commitment to protect freedom of the press, freedom of expression, and voting rights at all costs.

Andaleeve Rahman Partho, chairman of Bangladesh Jatiya Party, said it is not unlikely that press freedom would be under threat after the fall of such a fascist regime.

He said that when the interim government assumed office on August 8, the media outlets had said that the government should stay in power for two to three years. "They also said there is no difference between an Awami League government and that of the BNP's, and that the two parties are two sides of the same coin. This view of the media hurts us."

Partho said no one should think that if one government is replaced by another one, nothing will change. "Thinking along such line is another form of fascism."

"It is ultimately up to the people to decide. A gap has been created between political parties, the government, and the media. Many have tried to capitalise on this gap."

He also said the interim government has failed to keep in touch with the people.

"Had the government maintained more matured informal and formal relationships with the political parties, these problems would not have arisen."

Terming the incumbent government a weak government, Partho said no one can expect they would be protected by such a weak administration.

"Only a people's government, be it good or bad, can be held accountable. A political government can stand by the media and protect it."

Hamidur Rahman, assistant secretary general of Jamaat-e-Islami, said democracy and independent journalism are intrinsically linked.

He said his party thinks any attempt to weaken independent journalism is a conspiracy to undermine the state.

"Such actions constitute a new conspiracy aimed at obstructing the path of democracy and paving the way for the return of old fascism."

Highlighting Jamaat's continued support for independent journalism, Hamidur said, "Arson and other attacks and vandalism targeting newspaper offices are regrettable. We do not support such activities."

He called for a national consensus to address any such crisis.

Nagorik Oikya President Mahmudur Rahman Manna said, "When you talk about practising inclusive politics and democracy, you will also have to accept the idea of letting a hundred flowers to bloom. You cannot gag any opinion. Democracy is undoubtedly the rule of the majority, but at the same time, you must also acknowledge you cannot muzzle the minority communities."

He said every opinion must be allowed to be expressed.

"From this perspective, I believe that be it the Prothom Alo, The Daily Star, or any other newspaper or TV channel, they must be granted full freedom. If we cannot foster the expression of diverse opinions freely, it will be difficult for us to move forward."

Zonayed Saki, chief coordinator of Ganosamhati Andolon, said press freedom was the "key verdict" of the 1971 Liberation War and the 2024 mass uprising.

"For that, we need to stand for the media and its rights. Even if a media outlet is ideologically opposed to me, I will stand for its rights as well."

He said he believes there should be one standard for everyone.

"Even if we do not consider a particular media outlet ideologically correct, it still has the right to exist as a media entity. Ideological and political debates will continue, but committing a nuisance in front of a newspaper office aligns with fascist practices. Shutting a media outlet is an extension of this approach, and everyone should realise this."

Saki said there can be criticisms, and ideological differences among the people, but their freedom of speech should not be obstructed by any means.

"These issues should be clearly mentioned in the constitution in future."

There should be no compromise on press freedom because people rely on the media, he added.

Nasiruddin Patwary, convener of the Jatiya Nagorik Committee, called for unity among the stakeholders to resolve the problems facing the media through dialogue.

"Those who have resentment or complaints about any particular media outlet can resolve those issues through discussions," he said.

Nasir urged the media owners, workers, political figures, and all other stakeholders to come to a common platform so that no media house in the country would fall victim to aggression.

"Wherever there is an attack, we will collectively stand against it," he added.

Bazlur Rashid Firoz, general secretary of Bangladesh Samajtantrik Dal, said attacks on newspapers and media outlets are effectively assaults on democracy and the mass uprising of 2024. "To counter these attacks, we must unite and move forward collectively."

Saiful Haque, general secretary of Biplobi Workers Party, described the slaughter of a cow for a feast in front of a newspaper office as an unbelievable, unimaginable and worrying act.

Condemning the incident, he said, "The question of who was behind this remains unaddressed. Who will uncover this? There must be provocation and instigation behind it."

Communist Party of Bangladesh General Secretary Ruhin Hossain Prince criticised the arbitrary cancellation of the accreditation cards of some journalists and filing of murder cases against some others.

He said people must stand united against the attacks on the media.

Rashed Khan, general secretary of Gono Odhikar Parishad, said his party strongly believes in freedom of speech and freedom of press.

"If the journalists cannot write independently even after the mass uprising, it would be deeply saddening."

He said the media did not play its due role over the past 15 years, and the authorities should investigate into this failure.

Mujibur Rahman Manju, member secretary of Amar Bangladesh (AB) Party, highlighted a "gap" between the media stakeholders and those protesting against some media outlets.

"It was the government's responsibility to engage with the demonstrators outside the Prothom Alo office. What could have been resolved through discussion has instead been allowed to evolve into an ideological or commercial issue."

Manju suggested that the Media Reform Commission or the Noab make recommendations to prevent such incidents.

Maulana Imtiaz Alam, assistant secretary general of Islami Andolan Bangladesh, said, "We believe in freedom of the media and we want to assist them. However, the media also need to make sure it do not write or say anything that goes against the belief of the majority. The media also need to show respect to our belief."

Jalaluddin Ahmed, joint secretary general of Bangladesh Khelafat Majlish, urged the owners of media outlets not to discriminate between political parties while running news on them.

Reading out a written statement, Noab President AK Azad expressed deep concern that at a time when media outlets should be operating in a pressure-free environment after the mass uprising, some newspapers and media houses are still facing threats, and even warnings of closure.

He said incidents such as laying siege to newspaper offices in the name of protests, creating chaos, attacking regional offices, and obstructing the distribution of newspapers in different parts of the country are totally unacceptable.

These actions are fostering an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, posing a serious threat to press freedom, he said.

"The actions and campaigns against the Prothom Alo and The Daily Star are not merely protests or expression of dissent, rather those involve issuing threats, making provocative statements, spreading hatred, creating chaos outside their offices, and resorting to violence whenever possible. Such actions are causing financial losses to the newspaper industry."

Azad stressed the need for taking strong measures against such undemocratic activities that threaten press freedom.

He said the safety of the media outlets and their employees must be ensured at all costs.

The Noab leader called upon all political parties to assist and cooperate with the media to safeguard press freedom.

Mahfuz Anam, executive member of Noab and also the president of the Editors' Council, said the media want to see an end to the oppressive measures taken to suppress independent journalism and stifle the press over the last 15 years.

He said the media had hoped that the situation would improve after the mass uprising, allowing journalists to carry out their duties freely and independently.

"Unfortunately, independent journalism is being attacked in new ways, which is highly condemnable and alarming. We believe political parties play a significant role in supporting independent journalism," said Anam, also the editor and publisher of The Daily Star.

He urged political parties to ensure press freedom.

Muntasir Ali, joint secretary general of Khelafat Majlish, also spoke at the event.

Khalekuzzaman, adviser of Basod; Maj (retd) Abdul Wahab, convener of AB Party; Jahangir Hossain, senior joint secretary general of Khelafat Majlish, and its Joint Secretary General Mahabubul Haque; and Abdul Kaiyum, central publicity affairs secretary of Islami Andolan Bangladesh, were present at the meeting, moderated by Dewan Hanif Mahmud, editor and publisher of daily Bonik Barta.

Shahidullah Khan Badal, Noab vice-president and publisher of New Age; Matiur Rahman, editor and publisher of Prothom Alo; Nurul Kabir, editor of New Age; Altamash Kabir, editor of Dainik Sangbad; Saiful Alam, editor of daily Jugantor; Shamsul Haque Zahid, editor of Financial Express; Mozammel Haque, editor of daily Karatoa; and Mostafa Mamun, editor of Desh Rupantar, were also present.​

 

[Saif]

Has the media gotten out of the grip of (self-)censorship?

Failing to pursue these fundamental reforms at this critical moment would perpetuate the past practice of media suppression.

www.thedailystar.net

Has the media gotten out of the grip of (self-)censorship?

File Illustration: Biplob Chakroborty

In Bangladesh, the stories citizens read are often shaped not by journalistic choice alone but by an invisible force—censorship. Whether imposed directly by government actions or adopted defensively by journalists, this practice casts a long shadow over press freedom. Its roots lie in the country's legal and political framework, where repressive laws and political pressures compel journalists to avoid sensitive issues that might provoke legal repercussions or retaliation. This dynamic creates a delicate dance between journalists and the government, in which the former treads carefully so as not to cross the invisible line.

Since the regime change on August 5, 2024, there has been a surge in legal cases and intimidation against media outlets, amplifying fears and deepening the grip of self-censorship. Despite Dr Muhammad Yunus's stated commitment to press freedom, actions like the cancellation of press credentials and the incarceration of journalists send troubling signals, leaving media freedom in Bangladesh at a perilous crossroads.

The constitution of Bangladesh promises freedom of thought, conscience, and expression, alongside press rights under Articles 39(1) and 39(2), with caveats of "reasonable restrictions" for national security, public order, and morality—vague terms often misused by authorities to limit dissent and critical journalism. In addition to the constitution, the Press Council Act of 1974 supports press freedom and upholds journalistic integrity. Yet, the effectiveness of this Act is limited, and it lacks the enforcement muscle to shield journalists from legal and extra-legal threats.

For years, successive governments in Bangladesh have wielded repressive laws to penalise speech deemed, in their broad understanding, to be false, offensive, defamatory, or disruptive to law and order. Among the earliest and most contentious of these laws is the Special Powers Act of 1974, which established far-reaching state censorship by criminalising vaguely defined "prejudicial" content. This Act, and others like it, have been routinely exploited to silence dissenting voices and restrict the media's ability to report freely. Its impact is particularly alarming for two reasons: the government's expansive interpretation of what qualifies as "prejudicial" and the troubling conflation of legitimate criticism with threats to national security. These dynamics have allowed the Act to become a powerful tool for suppressing opposing views, undermining the free exchange of ideas that a vibrant democracy requires.

Subsequent laws, including the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Act, the Digital Security Act (DSA), and the Cyber Security Act (CSA), have continued this trend. Notorious provisions like Section 57 of the ICT Act penalised digital content deemed defamatory or religiously offensive with harsh sentences, fostering a culture of fear. Subsequently, the DSA of 2018 was enacted in response to public outcry over the ICT Act, while the CSA of 2023 followed as a reaction to international criticism of the DSA. Each of these laws has drawn criticism for pulling similar language from Section 57 of the ICT Act and repackaging it to retain authoritarian control over freedom of expression under broad pretexts like defamation, "negative propaganda," or hurting religious sentiments. Hundreds of arrests were made under this never-ending cycle of repressive laws, leading to accusations that the DSA (and then CSA) was used to silence dissent and discourage investigative journalism.

Since the fall of the past regime, the sacking of journalists for reportedly being linked with the previous government, without concrete criminal charges having been brought against them, is unsettling to say the least. Most recently, the government rescinded the press accreditation of numerous journalists, effectively restricting their access to government secretariats. Previously, the ICT Adviser Nahid Islam had, on several occasions, suggested that journalists could be prosecuted and punished due to their possible nexus with the erstwhile regime. The press secretary, Shafiqul Alam, gave a similar vague message. The cancellation of press passes and the administration's statement against journalists sends an ambiguous message: while the government maintains that it supports press freedom and expresses its willingness to repeal the draconian laws, its words and actions may pressure the media to cautiously choose its contents and stories.

It is important to mention that journalists are held to high professional and ethical standards and must uphold truth and accuracy in news reporting. The current legal framework, such as the 1993 Journalists' Code of Conduct, provides a grievance procedure if journalists breach their duties. The Code prohibits maliciously distorting or slanting news in commentary and headlines, requiring clear and fair presentation without bias. Newspapers are also expected to resist and expose crime and corruption. If any newspaper, news agency, editor, or journalist breaches journalistic ethics and codes of conduct, the Press Council, under Section 12(1) of the Press Council Act of 1974, may investigate complaints and warn, admonish, and rebuke the concerned parties after giving them an opportunity to be heard. There are legal recourse available in the existing Press Council Act and the Journalists' Code of Conduct.

The persecution of journalists without any specific allegations have attracted criticism from local and international quarters, raising alarms over the actual extent of media freedom in the country. Antoine Bernard of Reporters Without Borders called on the government to "stop the current legal harassment of more than 130 journalists" who have been charged with trumped-up crimes, as well as the arrest of some journalists without prior investigations. The Committee to Protect Journalists called for guaranteeing the procedural rights of incarcerated journalists.

The interim government's stated objective to right past wrongs and implement reform seems to be out of step with the continued plight of the media landscape in Bangladesh. The gap between the government's declared goals and the actual circumstances raises serious concerns about the current state and future trends of media independence. It may also thwart the goals of the Public Media Reform Commission, which is currently undertaking the job of furthering press freedom in Bangladesh.

Protests in July and August have flagged one of the most severe failures of the media in maintaining neutrality in times of crisis, yet similar patterns of media restrictions persist. If Bangladesh is to break out of this cycle where news outlets act primarily as a mouthpiece for the government, changes must extend beyond cosmetic promises. The interim government now has an opportunity and a corresponding responsibility to show real commitment to freedom of the press, which it can do by letting the Media Reform Commission work independently and by taking tangible steps that create an atmosphere where journalists can work without fear of retribution.

Failing to pursue these fundamental reforms at this critical moment would perpetuate the past practice of media suppression and drastically reduce public expectations of meaningful democratic change. The stakes are particularly high, given Bangladesh's history of political volatility and the critical role a free press must play in guaranteeing governmental accountability and fostering robust public debate.

Sangita Gazi is a postdoctoral research scholar at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.​

 

[Saif]

There should be no interference in press freedom: Zonayed Saki

Zonayed Saki stated, “We saw acclaimed media like Reuters carried a report that said the lawyer of Chinmoy Das has been killed. This is their plan.”

en.prothomalo.com

There should be no interference in press freedom: Zonayed Saki
Staff Correspondent
Chattogram
Published: 29 Nov 2024, 23: 03

Ganosamhati Andolan chief coordinator Zonayed Saki addresses as the chief guest at a mass dialogue at CRB Ground in Chattogram on 29 November 2024Prothom Alo

Ganosamhati Andolan chief coordinator Zonayed Saki on Friday said there should be no interference in the press freedom, people’s thinking, conscience and right to opinion.

“There should be no interference in the freedom of press, people’s thinking, conscience and right to opinion. Criticise the newspaper, everyone has that right. But attacking the newspaper office or something like that creates a perception around the world as if there is no press freedom in this country. This won’t bode well for us,” warned Zonayed Saki.

He was speaking as the chief guest at a mass dialogue at CRB Ground in Chattogram in the afternoon.

Chattogram unit of Ganosamhati Andolan organised the dialogue titled “Mass dialogue to establish a new political settlement for democratic transformation of the state”.

Over 500 leaders and activists of the party from Chattogram, Feni and other districts and upazilas attended the event.

Speaking about the killing of a lawyer in Chattogram, Saki said, “Saiful Islam was killed in a planned way. The Awami League and ISKCON men under the banner of ISKCON killed him. The banner of ISKCON was used so that the blame goes to the people of the Hindu community and the Muslims carry out attacks out of grievances, and they could send the photographs to the US.”

He stated, “We saw acclaimed media like Reuters carried a report that said the lawyer of Chinmoy Das has been killed. This is their plan. The image of Bangladesh is being presented to the western countries in such a way that the Hindus, Buddhists, Christians and other communities are not safe here.”

Expressing that staying in India, Sheikh Hasina has been conspiring to destroy Bangladesh, Zonayed Saki said, “You have thwarted their plot. You did not let any attack be carried out in Chattogram. As no attack is being carried out, the Awami League activists themselves are attacking the people of Hindu community now. I have heard there was an attempt to carry out an attack even today (Friday). That is why we need to forge a united measure to prevent those. Those who would attack the people of Hindu community are aides of the fascist and agents of local and foreign plotters. They want to destroy the uprising in Bangladesh and this government.”

Zonayed Saki contends there could be such elements within the government too, since many of their aides are still there hiding in various departments. They have to be identified and brought to book.

Mentioning the people as the centre of power, the Ganosamhati Andolan chief coordinator said there should be laws to ensure accountability of the people’s representatives to the people. For this there has to be the constitution and laws. Article 70 of the existing constitution has to be amended. Only the government will not appoint people in the constitutional posts. Instead, the governing party, the opposition and the judiciary will appoint their representatives, so that no partisan person could be appointed there. The judiciary must be made independent.

Indicating the government, Zonayed Saki said, “Maybe the interim government could not perform up to the people’s expected level as of now, we are criticising the government for that. Despite that, this interim government has been trying to carry out its responsibilities aligning with the interests of the people. We will criticise them and at the same time help them. A democratic constitution, reforms of the state and its laws and democratic elections are required for a new political settlement.”

He called on everyone to be united to form such a democratic force.

The dialogue was chaired by Ganosamhati Andolan’s Chattogram district unit coordinator Hasan Maruf.

Other speakers at the event also put emphasis on unity to work so that no autocratic force could usurp power in the new Bangladesh achieved through a mass-uprising.​

 

[Saif]

Environment for free expression a must

Prothom Alo Editor Matiur Rahman yesterday said significant reforms are needed in the state administration.

www.thedailystar.net

Environment for free expression must: Matiur Rahman

​

Photo: Collected

Prothom Alo Editor Matiur Rahman today said many reforms have to be made in the administration.

Matiur made the remarks as a guest speaker at an award ceremony held in honour of the late Professor Sitara Parveen of the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism at Dhaka University.

And to be successful in state affairs, there should be an open democratic environment and free expression throughout the society, he added.

There must be more open discussions on all important state issues.

"We have to work for journalism with courage from an independent and non-partisan position," Matiur said.

The event took place at the Professor Muzaffar Ahmed Chowdhury Auditorium in the Faculty of Social Sciences.

DU Vice-Chancellor Prof Dr Niaz Ahmed Khan paid glowing tribute to the memory of Prof Dr Sitara Parvin.

A total of 10 meritorious students of the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism of DU were recognised with the Prof Sitara Parvin Award for their outstanding results in BSS (Hons) final examination of 2022.

Prof Dr Sitara Parvin, daughter of former President Justice Shahabuddin Ahmed and wife of retired Journalism Prof Dr Ahaduzzaman Mohammad Ali, died in a tragic road accident on June 23, 2005 in the US.​

 

[Saif]

Reduce VAT on newsprint, ensure press freedom

Members of Newspaper Owners’ Association of Bangladesh (Noab) yesterday met the Media Reform Commission and spoke for press freedom, independent journalism, and reduction of VAT on newsprint.

www.thedailystar.net

Reduce VAT on newsprint, ensure press freedom
Noab urges Media Reform Commission

Members of Newspaper Owners' Association of Bangladesh (Noab) yesterday met the Media Reform Commission and spoke for press freedom, independent journalism, and reduction of VAT on newsprint.

During a views-exchange meeting with the commission, they demanded the necessary reforms in the Bangladesh Press Council and Department of Films and Publications (DFP) and underscored the necessity of lessening politicisation in newspaper ownership.

Kamal Ahmed, chief of the commission, stressed that the media should be free from any political influence so that they can work for the interest of the people.

He underlined the need for media free from political influence given the grievance expressed over the failure and controversial role of many media during the July-August uprising.

The meeting was held at the office of Noab President AK Azad.

"We don't have the environment for independent media due to the existing legal framework for the media," said a press release of the commission, quoting Mahfuz Anam, The Daily Star editor and publisher, as saying.

Prothom Alo Editor and Publisher Matiur Rahman said the newspaper industry became sick in this digital era. Besides, circulation of newspapers and the income from advertisement dropped sharply due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Mentioning that the previous governments tried to control the media, he said, "No governments in the past allowed media freedom and journalists could not work independently."

However, the previous government considered newspapers as its enemy, he said.

New Age Publisher Shahidullah Khan questioned the necessity of the enlistment of media outlets. He said the Press Council should be modernised and kept free from any influence of the executive.

Urging the commission to be careful so that no vested quarters can misguide them, Bonik Barta Editor and Publisher Dewan Hanif Mahmud criticised filing of cases against editors and journalists and the revocation of accreditation cards of journalists.

AK Azad, also the publisher of daily Samakal, said they, as publishers, had to face threats and incur financial loss. Except for the newspaper industry, all other industries got incentives during the Covid-19 pandemic, he said.

He also hoped that the Media Reform Commission would place specific recommendations for the independence of editors.

During the meeting, Kamal said there is no way that the commission would be influenced by any vested quarters, and that they would submit recommendations based on the opinions of stakeholders.

He added that the commission would seek opinions from all stakeholders to prepare guidelines for the state-run Bangladesh Betar, BTV, and Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS).

Daily Sangbad Editor Altamash Kabir and daily Financial Herald Publisher Masrur Reza also spoke at the meeting attended by other members of the commission.​

 

[Saif]

Student protesters entered Somoy TV owner’s offices, journos sacked

A gang of Bangladesh student protesters entered the offices of the investor of a television station, accusing it of “propaganda”, protesters said yesterday, with at least five journalists subsequently fired.

www.thedailystar.net

Student protesters entered Somoy TV owner’s offices, journos sacked

A gang of Bangladesh student protesters entered the offices of the investor of a television station, accusing it of "propaganda", protesters said yesterday, with at least five journalists subsequently fired.

The students had taken part in the August revolution that toppled prime minister Sheikh Hasina, whose tenure was marked as one of the worst periods for media freedom.

Hasnat Abdullah, convener of the Anti-Discrimination Students Movement, led around 15 to 20 students on December 17 to the offices of City Group, which invests in Somoy Television.

"Somoy Television was spreading propaganda, twisting my comments, and accommodating the views of a fallen political party," Hasnat told AFP.

"We are staunch supporters of press freedom, but the press must remain unbiased," Hasnat said, adding that he saw no issue in making demands -- but rejecting reports that the students had handed over a list of those they wanted to be fired.

The managing director of the business conglomerate that funds the television station did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

The incident has intensified fear among journalists in the wake of the revolution.

One journalist, Omar Faroque, who had been a senior editor of the television station, said he was among the five who received a termination letter without reason.

"The television authorities requested a few of us to step down for the greater good of the station," Faroque told AFP.

"We demanded an explanation for the decision, but the authorities refused to provide any."

Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus has repeatedly insisted he wants media freedom.

CA's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam sought to distance the government, saying that if someone "takes any action, the responsibility lies with them".

Press watchdogs say many journalists -- seen by critics as having supported Hasina when she was in power -- face police investigations in apparent retaliation for their past work.

At least four journalists were imprisoned, and scores are facing legal cases across the country.

Hasina and her government were frequently accused of exerting undue pressure on the handful of independent media outlets, including shutting down newspapers and TV channels and imprisoning journalists.

After Hasina's government fell, several TV channels, including Somoy TV, came under attack for their alleged allegiance to her Awami League.

In November, protesters besieged the offices of Prothom Alo, the largest Bangla-language newspaper, and threatened to shut it down, as well as The Daily Star.

Press freedom in Bangladesh has long been under threat.

Bangladesh ranks 165 out of 180 countries in press freedom, according to Reporters Without Borders.​

 

[Saif]

Proper reforms will strengthen the media

The changes proposed by the Media Reform Commission will address journalist vulnerabilities.

www.thedailystar.net

Proper reforms will strengthen the media
Proposed changes by media commission to address journalist vulnerabilities

VISUAL: STAR

We welcome the long-overdue official conversation on legislating protection for journalists in Bangladesh. The chief of the Media Reform Commission recently announced plans to recommend a new law to safeguard journalists, as well as amending 32 existing laws that hinder press freedom. Such initiatives are critical if we want a media industry that can truly serve as the fourth pillar of democracy, holding those in power accountable.

At a recent dialogue in Dhaka, the commission chief also underscored the importance of financial security for journalists, advocating for a minimum floor wage applicable nationwide. This statement coincides with the unveiling of findings from a Broadcast Journalist Center (BJC) survey that revealed that over half of the country's TV channels are failing to pay their employees on time, while at least 20 percent owe workers several months' salaries. The survey also found that less than 25 percent of channels provide provident funds, and only 10 percent offer gratuities. Similar challenges plague many print outlets as well. Alarmingly, especially outside Dhaka, journalists often have to juggle multiple roles—as reporters, ad procurers, and salespeople—leaving them vulnerable to corruption and exploitation.

Physical security remains another major concern. Reports of journalists facing attacks—sometimes fatal—while pursuing their work are far too frequent. We cannot forget the tragic death of Golam Rabbani Nadeem, district correspondent of Banglanews24.com and Ekattor TV, who was beaten to death after reporting on a local upazila parishad chairman's activities in Jamalpur. Equally haunting is the unresolved case of journalist couple Sagar Sarowar and Meherun Runi, who were murdered in their home 12 years ago, with justice still eluding their families.

In addition to these risks, journalists also face job insecurity. According to the BJC survey, at least 150 TV journalists lost their jobs this year alone. Expecting journalists to uphold high standards under such conditions is not only unrealistic, but also inhumane. This is why we applaud the Media Reform Commission's initiative to address these systemic issues. Reforms must ensure that the press is free from government interference and undue influence from powerful entities. Introducing a uniform code of conduct, aligned with international best practices, could help promote ethical and high-quality journalism.

Such measures are crucial to fostering a media landscape capable of holding power to account. We eagerly await substantive reforms that will enable journalists to thrive professionally and contribute to a more transparent, accountable society. Independent, fact-based journalism benefits everyone—and its sustainability depends on the authorities' commitment to ensuring journalists' well-being.​

 

[Saif]

Four journos of a newspaper injured in attack

Four journalists, including the editor and managing editor of the Janabani newspaper, were injured in an attack by criminals near their office in the capital's Banglamotor area yesterday afternoon.

www.thedailystar.net

Four journos of a newspaper injured in attack

Four journalists, including the editor and managing editor of the Janabani newspaper, were injured in an attack by criminals near their office in the capital's Banglamotor area yesterday afternoon.

The incident took place around 4:30pm when the journalists were on their way to the office.

The injured include Shafiqul Islam, editor and publisher of Janabani, Managing Editor Raju Ahmed Shah, Special Correspondent Bashir Hossain Khan, and online editor Ataur Hossain.

According to Bashir Hossain, a group of 20-22 men ambushed them.

"At first, we could not comprehend the situation. It appeared to be a pre-planned attack. We did not recognise any of them," he said.

He further mentioned that earlier a person named Ramzan had come to the Janabani office and threatened the staff.

The attackers reportedly first inquired about their names before launching the assault. "The way they came at us suggested that someone had directed them to attack us," Bashir added.

The journalists were taken to the emergency department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital around 6:00pm. They received treatment for their injuries and were later discharged.​

 

[Saif]

Suspension of accreditation cards a threat to free press

Says it poses threat, obstacle to independent journalism

www.thedailystar.net

Suspension of accreditation cards a threat to free press
Says Editors’ Council

The Editors' Council, in a statement yesterday, strongly condemned the suspension of journalists' accreditation cards and access to the Secretariat, stating that such an order poses a threat and obstacle to independent journalism.

On Friday, the Ministry of Home Affairs issued an order through a press release, which stated that the decision was made in the wake of security concerns arising from a fire incident at the Secretariat.

The order said that journalists' access to the Secretariat via accreditation cards has been suspended until further notice.

The next day, the Chief Adviser's Press Wing expressed regret over the restriction of journalists' access. In a statement, it said that, considering the security of the Secretariat, the administrative hub, journalists' entry using the current accreditation cards had been limited along with all other non-government passes.

The government also announced plans to review the existing press accreditation cards soon, it added.

Yesterday, a press note from the Department of Information stated that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is reassessing the accreditation cards.

The note further mentioned that permanent and temporary accreditation cards/passes will be reissued soon, and temporary passes for journalists will be provided starting today.

While welcoming the initiative to reassess and review the accreditation cards, the Editors' Council said that there is room for collaboration, if necessary, to identify unprofessional journalists.

However, it emphasised that imposing a blanket restriction on journalists' access is perceived globally as an attack on independent journalism, the statement said.

"Such tendencies were also evident during the fascist rule of the Awami League. When financial irregularities were rampant, journalists' access to regulatory institutions like Bangladesh Bank was restricted. During that time, journalists' stance on such activities was clear and unequivocal, as seen during the pre-uprising era leading to the downfall of the Sheikh Hasina government on August 5," the statement said.

The statement further added that after the interim government took office, demands arose for the reform or repeal of the Cyber Security Act.

On November 7, the interim government made a policy decision to repeal the act, and subsequently, on December 24, the advisory council of the interim government approved the draft of the Cyber Protection Ordinance, 2024.

"The new ordinance retains the same powers for the police as before, particularly outlined in Sections 35 and 36. Notably, the repealed Cyber Security Act also granted similar powers to the police, which was one of the major concerns raised by the Editors' Council regarding the misuse of police authority under the law," the statement read.

The Editors' Council said that the unwarranted cancellation of journalists' accreditation cards and access to the Secretariat is unjustified.

Moreover, it noted that the unilateral adoption of the ordinance without consultation with relevant stakeholders is disappointing and reflects an authoritarian mindset.

"Alongside protesting the cancellation of access, the council called for appropriate steps to address the concerns raised about the provisions in the draft Cyber Protection Ordinance, 2024, based on the opinions of all relevant stakeholders," it stated.​

 

[Saif]

CA’s Press Wing sits with journalist groups

The Chief Adviser’s Press Wing on Monday held a meeting with the leaders of Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists, Dhaka Union of Journalists, Dhaka Reporters’ Unity and Bangladesh Secretariat Reporters Forum (BSRF). “We told them we regret the inconvenience caused by the decis

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

CA’s Press Wing sits with journalist groups
UNB
Published :
Dec 30, 2024 20:53
Updated :
Dec 30, 2024 20:53

The Chief Adviser’s Press Wing on Monday held a meeting with the leaders of Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists, Dhaka Union of Journalists, Dhaka Reporters’ Unity and Bangladesh Secretariat Reporters Forum (BSRF).

“We told them we regret the inconvenience caused by the decision to limit entry of journalists at the Secretariat,” Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam said after the meeting.

They appreciated the government’s decision to quickly issue temporary entry passes to more than 200 journalists, he said.

“We’ve assured them the government would come up with more journalist-friendly and efficient accreditation cards for journalists,” Alam said.

No journalists will be affected by the new move, he said.

Leaders of all four groups who joined the meeting agreed to submit their proposals to improve accreditation cards and entry system for the Secretariat, Alam said.

“We believe in freedom of press and free flow of information. We also won’t compromise an inch on the question of national security,” Alam said.​

 

[Saif]

Challenges to media freedom in post-Hasina Bangladesh

Post-uprising media changes in Bangladesh face setbacks amid ongoing challenges.

www.thedailystar.net

Challenges to media freedom in post-Hasina Bangladesh

FILE VISUAL: ANWAR SOHEL

After the student-led mass uprising in July-August 2024, a lot of expectations emerged within society, which was normal. The media sector is no exception. During Sheikh Hasina's 15-plus years of hybrid regime, standard journalism practices declined drastically due to certain actions of a group of pro-Awami League journalists. It would be more appropriate to call them activists of the regime. The press wing of the ousted prime minister and a particular intelligence branch exerted a kind of pressure on our media outlets. That's why, after the Awami League's fall in August, people expected major changes in this sector. However, these expectations, under the interim government led by Prof Muhammad Yunus, have already experienced setbacks for many reasons. It is unfortunate that professional journalists who played a pivotal role in ousting Hasina are now facing unfortunate situations.

After the massive fire at the secretariat on December 26, another controversial decision related to journalism was made. Due to security concerns, the interim government suspended accreditation cards for journalists, including visitor and other passes. Barring others from the secretariat may be necessary, but restricting journalists from performing their daily duties is not acceptable. Although the press wing of the chief adviser clarified the issue and a temporary pass-issuance process was put in place, this decision ultimately did not bode well for media freedom. The Editors' Council and other journalists'-rights-based organisations issued statements saying that such decisions are a threat and an obstacle to independent journalism. By observing the situation closely, I can assume that this particular decision did not help journalism at all. However, I strongly agree with the authorities that many unprofessional journalists are holding accreditation cards for purposes other than journalism. These should be cancelled as early as possible.

Another burning and unfortunate issue is the firing of five senior journalists from Somoy TV. No doubt, this media outlet was one of the notorious propaganda machines of Sheikh Hasina. It systematically spread the regime's disinformation. On the other hand, this channel also targeted individuals who were critical of the ousted fascist regime. That said, firing journalists through "mob justice" is not acceptable. The information ministry and the press wing of the chief adviser failed to address this issue. This was undoubtedly done through the misconduct of student leaders. The press wing and the government should have taken proper action against it, but they did nothing. It has already become an international issue, which does not align with the reputation of Prof Yunus at all.

Yes, we are well aware that different media outlets under Sheikh Hasina became almost party propaganda cells. However, after her fall, intervening in TV channels and newspapers is not acceptable either. Alongside the spin doctors of these outlets, many professional journalists have also lost their jobs in recent months. These decisions were made under pressure and without following due process. A journalist of ATN Bangla is one of them; as far as I know, he had supported the students' movement. Yet, the ATN Bangla authorities fired him. The government did nothing in these journalists' aid. At the very least, it could have issued a strong statement against this malpractice.

Though Sheikh Hasina has fled, and her press and intelligence wings have been dissolved, has the sense of fairness in free journalism disappeared? Not at all. Senior journalist and editor of the daily Manab Zamin, Matiur Rahman Chowdhury, pointed out this issue during a public discussion. I think pressure groups—including some anti-discrimination student activists, government members, powerful political parties, and others—are already acting against media freedom.

I want to conclude with the example of journalist Khaled Muhiuddin, a renowned journalist who faced severe backlash on social media mainly for criticising student leaders. He also became a target after inviting a leader of Bangladesh Chhatra League, student wing of the Awami League, as a guest on his show. Hasnat Abdullah, convener of the anti-discrimination student movement, and Sarjis Alam, secretary of the July Shaheed Smrity Foundation, said Khaled Muhiuddin was "betraying the blood of the martyrs" by promoting Chhatra League. Though the proposed show was not conducted supposedly due to legal reasons, this issue has certainly cast a shadow over media freedom.

According to a report published by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) in May last year, Bangladesh ranks 165th out of 180 countries in the Press Freedom Index. Moreover, RSF identified Bangladesh as one of the most dangerous countries for journalists in their 2024 round-up report.

We don't want Bangladesh to be labelled as a dangerous country for journalism. We don't want further degradation of press freedom, and we don't want to lose the sense of fairness in professional journalism again. Hopefully, the interim government will take prompt and necessary steps in this regard. A new Bangladesh certainly deserves it.

Rahat Minhaz is assistant professor of mass communication and journalism at Jagannath University.​

 

[Saif]

‘Now is the time to pursue stories without fear’

Bangladesh is experiencing “unprecedented media freedom” as it transitions to democracy, said Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday.

www.thedailystar.net

‘Now is the time to pursue stories without fear’

Shafiqul says country seeing unprecedented media freedom

Bangladesh is experiencing "unprecedented media freedom" as it transitions to democracy, said Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday.

Speaking at the launch of the "Development Media Forum" by Oxfam at a city hotel, he said, "We haven't used security agencies, administrative orders, or repressive laws to muzzle people's voices over the last five months."

Encouraging journalists to ask tough questions, Shafiqul said, "You can criticise me, the panel of advisers, and the chief adviser. You have that freedom."

Highlighting the role of the media, he said, "For democracy to be institutionalised, media freedom is crucial. Now is the time for journalists to pursue any stories without fear."

Shafiqul criticised unchecked development projects, both public and private, for harming the environment and marginalised communities.

"Powerful lobby groups harm nature in the name of job creation. Is it development?" he asked.

Press Institute Bangladesh Director General Faruk Wasif said it is time to question whether inequalities have increased under the Awami League in the name of development.

"The so-called development narrative of past years failed to ensure freedom, serving instead to establish authoritarianism," he said.

Swedish Ambassador Nicolas Weeks highlighted the challenge of misinformation but pledged Sweden's support for good journalism in Bangladesh.

"Media can promote social justice and be the voice of the underrepresented," he added.

Oxfam Bangladesh Country Director Ashish Damle said the organisation aims to enhance knowledge sharing and bridge local and global perspectives for better reporting on key issues, including climate change, gender equality, and social justice.

The event featured journalists, development practitioners, and diplomats discussing the media's role in fostering sustainable development and public debate.​

 

[Saif]

Hasina regime silenced media

Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday said steps must be taken to ensure that no one can directly interfere with the media in the future like it was done during the ousted Sheikh Hasina government.

www.thedailystar.net

Hasina regime silenced media
Shafiqul Alam says previous govt used state agencies to muzzle press

VISUAL: ANWAR SOHEL

Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday said steps must be taken to ensure that no one can directly interfere with the media in the future like it was done during the ousted Sheikh Hasina government.

He said, "Over the past 15 years, intelligence agencies also played a role in silencing newspapers. Journalists would lose their jobs if they received certain phone calls, and news reports had to be removed..."

Shafiqul Alam made these remarks at a discussion titled "Media Reform Proposals: Citizens' Perspectives".

The event was organised by a group named "We Want a Fascism-Free Media" at the Dhaka Reporters' Unity in the capital's Segunbagicha.

Shafiqul said, "The previous government had the capability to control the media. A single phone call from DGFI, NSI, DB, or a minister was enough. I have heard many stories about how they controlled the media."

Advising to compile writings by columnists who defended fascist rule, he said, "Do not spread hatred against anyone. Punishing someone is not our objective. Conduct research; we aim to expose those who crafted the narratives."

Shafiqul said the previous government even justified murder as acceptable through its narratives. He emphasised the need for collective efforts to prevent the seeds of fascism from being sown again in Bangladesh.

He also said, "Ensuring the application of copyright law is crucial. All journalists must speak out strongly on this issue."

"You spend two months working on a report, and in just one minute, another news outlet -- or even a hundred outlets -- steals it. You take a great photo, and a major newspaper publishes it without permission. If you produce a quality report, a hundred outlets steal it. Those who engage in such theft should be shut down."

Akbar Hossain Majumder, press minister at the Bangladesh High Commission in the UK; Plabon Tariq, the group's spokesperson; Uttara University teacher Mahbub Alam, and lawyer Mollah Md Faruque Kaiser also spoke at the event.

Joynal Abedin Shishir, convener of the group, moderated the discussion.

The event concluded with the presentation of 13 proposals aimed at reforming the media.​

 

[Saif]

Effective press council to be formed: Kamal Ahmed

Media Reform Commission chief Kamal Ahmed said the commission has been formed to make the media independent and strong. The commission will recommend the formulation of suitable policies so that the media can play their role properly. Those who will survive in the journalism competition by followi

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Effective press council to be formed: Kamal Ahmed
RANGPUR CORRESPONDENT
Published :
Jan 19, 2025 22:32
Updated :
Jan 20, 2025 00:20

Media Reform Commission chief Kamal Ahmed said the commission has been formed to make the media independent and strong. The commission will recommend the formulation of suitable policies so that the media can play their role properly.

Those who will survive in the journalism competition by following the rules and regulations properly will be acceptable, he added.

Mr Kamal was speaking at a view exchange meeting with journalists of Rangpur division at the conference room of Rangpur district administration on Sunday afternoon.

The head of the media reform commission said normal development of mass media is not possible without healthy competition. "There is a tendency to use the media for personal and business interests or political influence in the country. There should be a minimum salary guarantee for the country's media workers," he said.

"If journalists do not have financial security, they will not have the mentality to work independently," he said.

In the meeting, the participants presented various proposals for media reform.

The proposals include:
​

• Formation of a media commission​
• Establishment of branch offices of PIB at the divisional level to enhance the skills of journalists​
• Bridging the gap between capital-based journalists and journalists in rural areas​
• Compelling all media to follow the guidelines of the Wage Board​
• Recognition of the profession of journalism​
• Keeping journalists free from partisan influence​
• Establishing control over online media​
• Repealing of laws gagging journalists​
• Determination of minimum educational qualifications for journalists​
• Eliminating party influence on DFP enlistment​
• Providing a unique identification number to journalists​
• Bringing journalists under social security​
• Ensuring equality of opportunity for all​
• Elimination of discrimination in advertising, etc.​

Commission members Shamsul Haque Zahid, Prof Gitiara Nasreen, Begum Kamrunnesa Hasan, Mostafa Sabuj and Abdullah Al Mamun and its deputy secretary Kazi Ziaul Baset, among others, were present at the view exchange meeting.

Around 120 journalists from online, electronic and print media from eight districts and upazilas of Rangpur division joined the meeting.​

 

[Saif]

MRC aims to build independent, strong, objective media: Kamal Ahmed

Media Reform Commission (MRC) Chief Kamal Ahmed said on Tuesday that the main objective of the commission is to build an independent, strong and objective media. He made the remark while exchanging views with journalists from print and electronic media in Rajshahi division at the conference room o

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

MRC aims to build independent, strong, objective media: Kamal Ahmed
BSS
Published :
Jan 21, 2025 21:04
Updated :
Jan 21, 2025 21:04

Media Reform Commission (MRC) Chief Kamal Ahmed said on Tuesday that the main objective of the commission is to build an independent, strong and objective media.

He made the remark while exchanging views with journalists from print and electronic media in Rajshahi division at the conference room of the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Rajshahi.

Kamal Ahmed said the commission is working to meet the expectations of the people by overcoming the anger and crisis of trust arisen in the media during the regime of fascist Awami League government due to the inability of doing impartial and independent journalism.

Stressing the need of identifying the weaknesses of the media to meet the people’s expectations, he said they are trying to identify the weaknesses by conducting public opinion surveys based on the opinions of the field level journalists, editors and readers.

In addition, he said, they are also trying to figure out the weaknesses of the media hearing the opinions of newspaper owners and others involved with the media industry.

Referring to compliance with the code of conduct in doing objective journalism, he said that if the code of conduct and principles are followed, it is possible to do objective and impartial journalism alongside removing other obstacles.

Regarding the issue of disclosing the assets of newspaper or television owners, he said that newspaper owners and editors should publish annual financial statement.

When everyone is being held accountable in all cases, why newspaper owners or editors should be exempted from it, he added.

Kamal Ahmed said that the commission will work on bringing them under accountability as well.

Agreeing with the issue of providing assistance to the families of journalists who died during the movement while performing their professional duties, he said that the issue of compensation for the dead and injured is an important question.

“We have to take this into consideration,” he said, adding, they should be brought under assistance through the July Foundation.

He advised the government to be more aware in this regard.

He also said that the issues of withdrawing cases should be considered with priority basis as they have been faced harassment cases, served jail terms and remained unemployed.

Media Reform Commission members Professor Dr Gitiara Nasreen, Shamsul Haque Zahid, Kamrunnesa Hasan, Jimmy Amir, Deputy Information Officer of Rajshahi Regional Information Office Md. Touhiduzzaman, Deputy Regional Director of Bangladesh Betar Rajshahi Mohammad Jahangir Alam, editors of various daily and online newspapers, publishers and journalist leaders of various districts, among others, also joined the meeting.​

 

[Saif]

Media reform should address sectoral male bias

WOMEN’S rights activists and media scholars consider developing a gender-sensitive reporting strategy and an effective system to monitor journalistic practices in print, broadcast and digital media as a priority agenda for media sector reforms. They have expressed their concern at a roundtable...

www.newagebd.net

Media reform should address sectoral male bias
27 January, 2025, 00:00

WOMEN’S rights activists and media scholars consider developing a gender-sensitive reporting strategy and an effective system to monitor journalistic practices in print, broadcast and digital media as a priority agenda for media sector reforms. They have expressed their concern at a roundtable discussion on gender-sensitive reporting and said that the majority of media outlets do not have a gender policy. The policy vacuum results in biased and sensationalised reporting. Considering the biased representation of women, their concerns are not misplaced. Victim-blaming is not uncommon in reporting on issues of gender-based violence and gender inequality. Despite a legal bar on disclosing the identity of rape victims, the media have disclosed the identity of victims on a number of occasions. Sensationalised and objectified representation of women for profiteering has also been a concern. The media reforms commission, formed in November 2024, with plans to revitalise the tradition of public interest journalism and strengthen media freedom should, therefore, make gender policy a priority concern.

In addition to patriarchal bias in reporting, there are other concerns. In recent times, the media sector has seen a significant growth, with 45 television channels, 25 FM radio stations, 32 community radio stations, 1,248 daily newspapers and more than 100 online news portals. Women, however, account for only 4 per cent of the work force and they seldom have access to leadership and decision-making. Studies have showed how patriarchal bias in human resource management and labour policy, particularly reluctance at granting maternity leave or ensuring child care, led to a high drop-out rate among women journalists. Except for a few print media houses, the sector does not comply with the High Court order that has asked all employers to set up anti-sexual harassment cells in offices. It has been reported how unresolved cases of sexual harassment have compelled women to leave their profession. The gender-based wage gap has also been reported. Professional associations for journalists have also failed to ensure women’s representation and rarely addressed issues of gender discrimination. It is, therefore, not an overstatement that the media landscape is male-dominated.

Media reforms should, therefore, include an outlined policy to ensure gender-sensitive reporting and increased women’s participation. In doing so, the government should review the licensing process so that no new media house is given a license without a gender policy and an anti-sexual harassment cell. The Press Institute of Bangladesh and other similar agencies can play a role in providing appropriate training in gender issues and developing a mechanism to prevent sensationalised reporting for profiteering interests. Professional associations of journalists should abandon their male bias and consider fighting patriarchy in the sector and society.​

 

[Saif]

High cost of journalism

Journalism is always challenging, and journalists are subject to various forms of intimidation due to their role in maintaining professionalism. Governments are generally not comfortable with the works of journalists, although, in democratic states, they are obliged to provide adequate room f

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

High cost of journalism
Tanim Asjad
Published :
Jan 31, 2025 23:00
Updated :
Jan 31, 2025 23:00

Journalism is always challenging, and journalists are subject to various forms of intimidation due to their role in maintaining professionalism. Governments are generally not comfortable with the works of journalists, although, in democratic states, they are obliged to provide adequate room for journalism to function. The media is also obligated to play a responsible role in this connection. In this process, an environment of mutual cooperation develops for people's greater interests. Responsible media helps maintain the checks and balances of the government and the establishment. There is, however, no ideal democratic country in the world where journalists enjoy complete independence in their works and freedom of speech is fully ensured. Nevertheless, almost all functional democracies provide the required environment for newspapers and media with some limitations.

Like autocratic and authoritarian countries, non-functional democracies impose various media restrictions, making it difficult to work independently and professionally. Thus, journalism becomes distorted and suppressed in these countries. The autocratic regimes also adopt different techniques to make the media dysfunctional, biased and embedded. Undue monitoring, surveillance and financial tightening forced media outlets to compromise their stance. Supporting the pro-establishment media is another tool for holding back the professional works of journalism. Bangladesh is a good example of this.

During the autocratic regime of Sheikh Hasina, the tool was applied skillfully only to extract pressure on the media and distort the market. The net result is a sharp division among the journalists in the name of party-based so-called ideology. One group blindly extended their support to the Hasina regime on the plea that the regime was the only force that upheld the spirit of the liberation war. They argued that the misdeeds and wrongdoings of the regime should be ignored and not be reported in the media. This section of journalists was awarded for their loyalist role, making it more difficult for others to work professionally. Besides state agencies, the Hasina-loyal media also took a position against those who were critical of the regime, setting a bad example with a long-term negative effect.

During the mass uprising in July-August last year, the media in Bangladesh came under fire for not playing the appropriate role and the professionalism of journalists was questioned seriously. Except for a few media outlets and some journalists, most followed a cautious approach to the plea to avoid backlash from the ousted Hasina government and her political party. The pro-regime journalists also played a role in suppressing the news of killing and intimidating the government to suppress the student-led movement. So, after the fall of Hasina, who fled to India for shelter on August 5, journalists across the country faced intense criticism for obvious reasons. Their trustworthiness also came under question.

The problem is, however, not limited to Bangladesh. Media in India, the largest democracy in the world, has also been facing growing challenges due to the works of pro-government journalists and Modi loyalists. The term' godi media' has been popularised since 2014, indicating a large number of Indian media's non-professional and biased attitude. Instead of informing people properly, the 'godi media' is busy with cooking and fabricating stories where truth is mixed with fiction. The coverage of different things inside and outside India thus often becomes distorted and false. The proliferation of 'godi media' has put reputed newspapers like The Hindu under significant stress.

Again, think about Haaretz, the oldest daily in Israel, which has Hebrew and English versions. After the Hamas assault on October 7, Israel started a full-scale invasion of Gaza, causing the death of 50,000 Palestinians and the destruction of most of the physical infrastructures in the strip. The 15 months of war halted as two sides agreed on a fragile cease-fire deal with effect from January 20. During these months, Haaretz took a strong stance to cover the war in a balanced and unbiased manner that was completely absent in most Israeli and Western media. Israeli government continuously put pressure on the oldest daily and its journalists for its professional stance. The newspaper, however, sustained at a greater cost, setting an example of journalistic ethics and the establishment's unwillingness to accept the truth.​

 

[Saif]

73% people do not read newspapers

Newspapers are losing their appeal across the country, with more readers choosing mobile phones as the preferred device for reading news nowadays, according to a study by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).

www.thedailystar.net

73% people do not read newspapers
Finds BBS survey on 45,000 households across 64 dists

​

• Only 26% read news​
• 59% read news on phones​
• 37% prefer print newspapers​
• Popular consensus is on media independence​

Newspapers are losing their appeal across the country, with more readers choosing mobile phones as the preferred device for reading news nowadays, according to a study by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).

According to its findings released yesterday, 26 percent of respondents said they read newspapers. About 59 percent read news on mobile phones, while 37 percent prefer print newspapers.

Those who don't read newspapers make up 73 percent of the respondents, with 46 percent saying they do not feel it is necessary.

"Overall, people haven't lost trust in the media, but interference from political arena, government and influential persons is seen as a major obstacle to publishing objective news," said Md Sayem Hossain, senior information officer of the Media Reforms Commission, in a press release issued yesterday.

The BBS survey, the first of its kind in the country, was conducted across 64 districts, involving the participation of members from 45,000 households aged 10 and above.

Meanwhile, 65 percent of people watch television. Among the 34.58 percent who do not, 53 percent said they don't find it necessary.

During a national disaster or crisis, 35 percent of people first look for updates on news channels on television, followed by 28 percent who turn to social media, and 24 percent who ask a trustworthy person.

The survey reveals that the people want to see the media independent, impartial, and free from government and political influence.

Of the respondents, 15 percent said mass media in the country is not free at all, while 23 percent said it is partially free, 24 percent said it is largely free, and 17 percent believe it is fully free.

Among the 6,849 respondents who believe mass media is not free at all, most cited political interference as the main reason, followed by government interference and influence by powerful individuals.

Nationally, 67 percent of people expect mass media to be independent, 60 percent expect media neutrality or impartiality, 37 percent want media to be free from political influence, and 32 percent expect mass media to be free from government influence.

Most people think state-owned Bangladesh Television and Bangladesh Betar should be operated under the stewardship of the government. Over 56 percent of people believe Bangladesh Television should be operated under government control, while 55 percent said the same for Bangladesh Betar.

In the case of radio, 93 percent of respondents said they do not listen to the radio, with 54 percent saying that they do not find it necessary.​

 

[Saif]

A new reality for free media

Sadly, some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

www.thedailystar.net

A new reality for free media
We must learn from the past

VISUAL: SALMAN SAKIB SHAHRYAR

Before, when we spoke the truth, we were countered by the state and its agencies. Now, when we speak the truth, we are countered not by the state, but by lies, accusations without any proof, and tagging on the basis of hate narratives. Outrageous accusations are being made against legacy media without any evidence. In rare cases, when examples are cited, they are either false, taken out of context, distorted, or twisted to suit a predetermined goal. Thus, the media today is facing a new challenge in the post-truth era with an audience that is not used to such falsehood, half-truths and distortions, and as such is being victimised and misled.

I am heartened by a recent comment by the chief adviser's press secretary, Shafiqul Alam, for his emphatic assertion of the need for a free media for a country's advancement. He also stressed the necessity to examine the media's role in distorting objective journalism and upholding the fascistic policy and governance structure of the past regime. He repeatedly stressed that power must always be held to account, and invited all media outlets to scrutinise his own government's performance in the spirit of total independence and professionalism.

We would like to commend him for his stance and focus on two aspects of his remarks: the need to examine our past, and to chalk out a path for the media's unfettered and independent future journey.

As for the past, it is true that most newspapers did not challenge the dictatorial regime of Sheikh Hasina during her rule of over 15 years. They either vigorously supported it or hid the truth, deflected issues that deserved criticism, or distorted facts so that the public wouldn't feel negative about the regime.

There were a few of us who defied all threats—both public and undercover—and carried on speaking truth to power. In the case of this newspaper, the antagonism burst into fury when we invited Prof Muhammad Yunus as chief guest at our 25th anniversary celebration in 2016. In the presence of thousands of invited guests, including 22 editors from South and Southeast Asia, a drama was enacted by several Awami League (AL) ministers who publicly staged a walkout, shouting condemnatory remarks, accusing this writer of having insulted them when Prof Yunus appeared on the stage to deliver the keynote speech. This newspaper was accused of "launching" (whatever that meant) Prof Yunus and giving him a huge national and international platform to work against the Hasina government. (Given her venomous remarks, relentless personal attacks, and fictitious cases against Yunus ever since, one can understand her fury against this newspaper and its editor.) From then on, we were her declared "enemy," and she treated us as such. The avalanche of cases started within hours of that event using my remark on a TV show as a pretext.

This newspaper's editor was charged in 84 cases, 16 of which were for sedition. Several times on the floor of parliament, the former prime minister termed The Daily Star and Prothom Alo "anti-state," "anti-Awami League," and "anti-people." Many AL MPs castigated this newspaper in parliament, accusing us of "indulging" in all sorts of "conspiracies." Even some non-AL MPs joined the castigation, demanding the closure of this newspaper and jailing of its editor. On one occasion, the former prime minister spoke for 21 minutes in parliament denigrating this newspaper's editor, casting doubt on his role as a freedom fighter and raising all sorts of false questions against him. A few years later, during the opening of the Padma Bridge, she falsely accused this writer of travelling to the US and meeting high-level State Department officials and the World Bank president to lobby for the cancellation of the WB loan, as part of Prof Yunus's alleged "efforts" (totally false) to scuttle the Padma Bridge project. For nearly 15 years, we were never allowed to attend the former prime minister's press conferences or any of her functions. We were never allowed to cover her foreign trips or ask her questions as the head of the government. Over time, all her ministers, save one or two, started to avoid us, not allowing our reporters to talk to them and speaking against us whenever the occasion permitted. And all this while some 40 national and international businesses were asked not to give us any advertisement, abruptly reducing our revenue by 40 percent. This continued till the July uprising last year.

We are proud to say that The Daily Star never buckled, thanks to our staff, our board of directors, and the leadership.

The CA's press secretary also laid emphasis on examining not only the past, but also how media covered the events of July-August 2024, now popularly called the Monsoon Revolution. We welcome this decision and thank him for his praise that some media, in spite of severe threats, published prominently the number of students and general people being killed daily.

We also need to examine the politicisation of journalist unions. A special focus should be given on the role of the owners of media houses who used their outlets to eulogise the Hasina government for business purposes, get illegal bank loans, get lucrative contracts, retain untaxed profits, and indulge in money laundering. When directed by the owners, working journalists did not have much of a choice. We think the editors should have tried to prevent that—and failing that, they should have resigned.

Against all the laudable things that are being said about the freedom of media and the present opportunity to engage in independent journalism, we are sad to say that some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

As of November 2024, as many as 140 journalists have been accused of murder and cases have been filed against them on the basis of their reporting of the student-led mass uprising. Twenty eight journalists have been charged with crime against humanity. We strongly feel that the interim government's treatment of journalists has been sweeping, denigrating, and devoid of the sensitivity that this profession deserves. At this moment, we have the highest number of "murder-accused" journalists in the world. In this situation, how likely is it that the world will believe this government is handling the media fairly? Whatever criticism that this government has so far received from world bodies—Human Rights Watch (HRW), Committee for the Protection of Journalists (CPJ), Reporters without Borders (RSF)—has mostly been for the way journalists are being treated.

It has been several months since the cases against journalists were filed. We know of no progress in terms of verification of the accusations. An eight-member committee by the interim government was formed to monitor harassment cases against journalists on October 27. No progress on this account has been reported till now. All this, while the accused journalists are unable to do their regular jobs, take care of their families, and in some cases pay for their children's education. They are also suffering from social humiliation and leading a life of constant fear, lest they be arrested. For any criminal or unethical action, a journalist must face the law as any other citizen. But everyone must be guaranteed the due process under the law, which is their constitutional right.

We appeal to the interim government, given all their professed commitment to free and independent media, to take an immediate look into the cases against journalists and bring them to an accepted legal standard.

Mahfuz Anam is the editor and publisher of The Daily Star.​

 

[Saif]

Bangladesh’s media crossroads

THE media landscape in Bangladesh has undergone a seismic transformation over the past few decades. From the era of a single state-run television channel, BTV, to the proliferation of private TV networks and the meteoric rise of digital platforms, the industry has witnessed both unprecedented...

www.newagebd.net

Bangladesh’s media crossroads
Rezaul Hasan 20 February, 2025, 00:00

THE media landscape in Bangladesh has undergone a seismic transformation over the past few decades. From the era of a single state-run television channel, BTV, to the proliferation of private TV networks and the meteoric rise of digital platforms, the industry has witnessed both unprecedented growth and daunting challenges. As traditional media faces steady decline, the digital revolution offers both opportunities and threats, demanding a strategic recalibration to sustain the industry’s future.

Until the 1990s, Bangladesh’s media was dominated by BTV, alongside a few print and radio outlets. A turning point came in 1992 when satellite broadcasting introduced foreign television channels to Bangladeshi audiences, marking the advent of cable TV. However, it was the digital revolution — particularly after 2003 — that fundamentally reshaped media consumption habits.

According to Kantar, 67 per cent of Bangladeshi households now own television sets, with TV media exposure rising from 48 per cent to 70 per cent over the past two decades. Simultaneously, digital media has experienced exponential growth, signifying a radical shift in audience behaviour. Yet, with every opportunity comes a set of challenges that threaten to derail progress.

Despite the rapid evolution of digital platforms, the country’s media industry faces severe financial constraints. Print media is in steady decline, radio is on the brink of disappearance, and television channels struggle to maintain sustainable revenue streams. These issues are exacerbated by the lack of a robust audience measurement system, which hampers effective media planning and investment.

Bangladesh’s media industry operates within a fragile financial model. The primary stakeholders — advertisers, agencies, and media houses — are grappling with shifting dynamics. While multinational corporations have historically dominated media investment, local conglomerates are now leading the charge. However, a significant portion of media investment — over one-third — is still managed in-house by advertisers, bypassing media agencies altogether.

Moreover, Bangladesh lags behind its South Asian counterparts in media exposure. While 70 per cent of Bangladeshis watch television, this figure is overshadowed by Pakistan’s 92 per cent and Sri Lanka’s 75 per cent. Print readership is even lower, with only 11 per cent of Bangladeshis engaging with newspapers compared to 25 per cent in India. Additionally, 60-70 per cent of TV viewing time in Bangladesh is dominated by foreign channels, particularly from West Bengal, further diminishing the market share of local broadcasters.

The advertising industry, which remains a vital source of revenue for media, is also experiencing significant changes. Multinational companies have traditionally led media investments in Bangladesh, but in recent years, local businesses have gained ground. Brands such as Unilever, Marico, Reckitt Benckiser, and Grameenphone continue to be major advertisers, but domestic corporations like ACI Limited, Dutch Bangla Bank, and Pran-RFL are expanding their presence. This shift presents both an opportunity and a challenge — while increased local investment strengthens the industry, the growing trend of direct media buying by advertisers weakens the role of agencies, disrupting the traditional ecosystem of media planning and buying.

Enhanced audience measurement systems are essential for media planning. Strengthening TV ratings systems, national media surveys, and digital analytics will enable advertisers and agencies to optimise investments and ensure content is tailored to audience preferences. A more transparent and data-driven approach will create a level playing field, fostering sustainable competition in the advertising sector.

Robust media policies and revenue models must be developed to support local content production. Unlike other South Asian nations, local broadcasters do not benefit from cable TV subscription revenues, despite the market being three times larger than the TV advertising industry (valued at Tk. 1,600 crore annually). Implementing policies that allow local channels to earn a share of subscription revenue could provide a much-needed financial boost. Additionally, fostering syndication opportunities, diversifying revenue streams, and forming strategic content partnerships with corporate and public stakeholders will strengthen the industry’s economic foundation.

The demand for high-quality local content is another crucial factor that must be addressed. Countries like Pakistan and Sri Lanka have successfully retained audiences through strong local programming, yet Bangladesh continues to see a significant portion of its audience turn to foreign content. This trend underscores the urgent need for investment in original, compelling media productions that cater to local tastes and cultural narratives. Strengthening content production and fostering collaborations between media houses, advertisers, and production studios will help retain audiences and enhance the competitiveness of Bangladesh’s media sector.

Investing in talent development is crucial for the media sector to thrive. A workforce that blends creativity with analytical expertise is necessary to navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Academic programmes, training initiatives, and technological skill development will equip professionals with the necessary tools to keep pace with industry changes.

Technology adoption is also vital to ensuring media sustainability. The rise of digital media means that traditional platforms must integrate new technologies such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, and programmatic advertising to remain relevant. Media houses must embrace innovative strategies to monetise content effectively, including digital subscriptions, pay-walls, and premium content offerings.

Bangladesh’s media industry stands at a crossroads. While challenges persist, this is not the end of the road. By addressing existing structural weaknesses and embracing innovation, the industry can transition into a more sustainable and resilient future. With the right policies, data-driven strategies, and a skilled workforce, Bangladesh’s media sector can not only survive but thrive in the digital age.

A robust media landscape is crucial for an informed and democratic society. As the voice of the voiceless, the media plays an indispensable role in shaping public discourse and ensuring accountability. Striking a balance between media houses, advertisers, and agencies is vital to fostering a thriving industry that can contribute meaningfully to Bangladesh’s economic and social development.

Rezaul Hasan is a managing partner at Mindshare Bangladesh.​

 

[Saif]

When the media are considered dispensable

That the media are no longer the primary and dominant source of news is quite understandable. A survey conducted by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics on behalf of the Media Reform Commission to know how people gather news and the source they consider credible has only confirmed the shift in peopl

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

When the media are considered dispensable
Nilratan Halder
Published :
Feb 20, 2025 22:56
Updated :
Feb 20, 2025 22:56

That the media are no longer the primary and dominant source of news is quite understandable. A survey conducted by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics on behalf of the Media Reform Commission to know how people gather news and the source they consider credible has only confirmed the shift in people's choice for sources of news. Instead of relying on traditional media outlets such as newspapers, radio and even television, they prefer cell phones---smartphones in particular---for updating themselves about national and international developments. During national crises or disasters, though, they turn to television, most likely for live coverage of the unfolding events.

It is disheartening that 46 per cent of the selected respondents across social segments felt there was no need for reading newspaper. Against this, 53 per cent felt the same way about television with 54 per cent finding no interest in listening to the radio for news. Printed newspapers have long been losing their grounds to electronic media. But never before has a handy digital device been so versatile to keep its owner connected to the world at large.

The modern trend of short-cut is most likely to have a decisive role to play here. Before asking the audiences the question if they read newspaper or consider this a reliable source of information, they should have been asked if they read books at all; and if they do, how much time they spend on books. The percentage of book readers is increasingly declining because more and more people now consider book reading sheer waste of time. Instant gratification without verification has become the norm. As high as 88 per cent of the participants were found to be reliant on cell phones for keeping them abreast with developments all around.

The level of concentration needed for a post-editorial (article or column in common parlance) or editorial is lacking in the users of social sites. So, the number of discerning newspaper readers is also decreasing. No wonder, facebook and You Tube are the trusted source for 31 per cent and 16.5 per cent respectively. It is exactly at this point, the issue of news literacy has a very important function. Amid multiple sources of news, there is a dearth of verified and authentic reporting on issues, particularly the sensitive ones. Few readers can see through deficient, motivated and distorted news published without in-depth insight and balanced treatment based on versions of stakeholders belonging to opposing camps.

Flawed news consumption thus proves highly dangerous because instead of helping the readers to make informed decision, it can incite violence or social upheaval making a mountain out of a molehill. Newspapers or the media in general are passing a most critical time not only in Bangladesh but also across the globe. When the majority of people think newspapers and radio are dispensable, it is not a question of subscription and revenue but also of a national habit and culture. A rich vein of interaction and communication is behind the development of such a tradition and culture.

Well, radio may have lost its appeal because the receiving sets are almost out of market together with the inconvenience of moving knobs to chosen stations. Then the cell phone can be used as an alternative to such sets. Television creates instant news hardly ever furnishing in-depth analysis. This is why TV channels arrange for talk shows. So, the newspapers have the opportunity to carry the banner of projecting views and analysis in a dispassionate manner, provided that the media are free to do so. In countries where journalists have to self-censor themselves under hostile regimes, maintaining objectivity is always a challenge. Bangladesh has never been an exception to this rule, not even now.

The year 2024 was the worst year for journalists. In Bangladesh it was like walking a tightrope for them. Several newspapers and other media outlets faltered because their inhibition got the better of acceptance of the unprecedented change that was about to sweep away everything on its way like the great deluge. Not only news literacy but also a high level of cultural attainment is a sine qua non for preserving democratic values, human rights and freedom of the Press. Both society and the media grow together forging a symbiotic relationship. But today's world is not an ideal place for fostering such relations.

Crafty and intriguing use of digital devices have put into the most important seats of power political minnows or jokers who have agenda inimical to the prosperity of the human civilisation. The highest global organisation, United Nations (UN) has been turned irrelevant to the distress of humanity across swathes of the planet. Genocide and destruction of villages, towns and human settlements go on almost unchallenged, undermining in the process the rule of law and democratic principles everywhere. The big powers use smaller and poor countries as their stooges or playthings.

Thus economic independence of such nations is lost in favour of their status as vassal states where the big players install their chosen people in power. Thus dictators are created and after a certain period, public sentiment grows. The media can only play the role of a commentator to stay afloat hardly ever creating public opinion in favour of peace and national stability. In murky politics, the growth of powerful media becomes ever more challenging.​

 

[Saif]

A new reality for free media

Sadly, some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

www.thedailystar.net

A new reality for free media
We must learn from the past

VISUAL: SALMAN SAKIB SHAHRYAR

Before, when we spoke the truth, we were countered by the state and its agencies. Now, when we speak the truth, we are countered not by the state, but by lies, accusations without any proof, and tagging on the basis of hate narratives. Outrageous accusations are being made against legacy media without any evidence. In rare cases, when examples are cited, they are either false, taken out of context, distorted, or twisted to suit a predetermined goal. Thus, the media today is facing a new challenge in the post-truth era with an audience that is not used to such falsehood, half-truths and distortions, and as such is being victimised and misled.

I am heartened by a recent comment by the chief adviser's press secretary, Shafiqul Alam, for his emphatic assertion of the need for a free media for a country's advancement. He also stressed the necessity to examine the media's role in distorting objective journalism and upholding the fascistic policy and governance structure of the past regime. He repeatedly stressed that power must always be held to account, and invited all media outlets to scrutinise his own government's performance in the spirit of total independence and professionalism.

We would like to commend him for his stance and focus on two aspects of his remarks: the need to examine our past, and to chalk out a path for the media's unfettered and independent future journey.

As for the past, it is true that most newspapers did not challenge the dictatorial regime of Sheikh Hasina during her rule of over 15 years. They either vigorously supported it or hid the truth, deflected issues that deserved criticism, or distorted facts so that the public wouldn't feel negative about the regime.

There were a few of us who defied all threats—both public and undercover—and carried on speaking truth to power. In the case of this newspaper, the antagonism burst into fury when we invited Prof Muhammad Yunus as chief guest at our 25th anniversary celebration in 2016. In the presence of thousands of invited guests, including 22 editors from South and Southeast Asia, a drama was enacted by several Awami League (AL) ministers who publicly staged a walkout, shouting condemnatory remarks, accusing this writer of having insulted them when Prof Yunus appeared on the stage to deliver the keynote speech. This newspaper was accused of "launching" (whatever that meant) Prof Yunus and giving him a huge national and international platform to work against the Hasina government. (Given her venomous remarks, relentless personal attacks, and fictitious cases against Yunus ever since, one can understand her fury against this newspaper and its editor.) From then on, we were her declared "enemy," and she treated us as such. The avalanche of cases started within hours of that event using my remark on a TV show as a pretext.

This newspaper's editor was charged in 84 cases, 16 of which were for sedition. Several times on the floor of parliament, the former prime minister termed The Daily Star and Prothom Alo "anti-state," "anti-Awami League," and "anti-people." Many AL MPs castigated this newspaper in parliament, accusing us of "indulging" in all sorts of "conspiracies." Even some non-AL MPs joined the castigation, demanding the closure of this newspaper and jailing of its editor. On one occasion, the former prime minister spoke for 21 minutes in parliament denigrating this newspaper's editor, casting doubt on his role as a freedom fighter and raising all sorts of false questions against him. A few years later, during the opening of the Padma Bridge, she falsely accused this writer of travelling to the US and meeting high-level State Department officials and the World Bank president to lobby for the cancellation of the WB loan, as part of Prof Yunus's alleged "efforts" (totally false) to scuttle the Padma Bridge project. For nearly 15 years, we were never allowed to attend the former prime minister's press conferences or any of her functions. We were never allowed to cover her foreign trips or ask her questions as the head of the government. Over time, all her ministers, save one or two, started to avoid us, not allowing our reporters to talk to them and speaking against us whenever the occasion permitted. And all this while some 40 national and international businesses were asked not to give us any advertisement, abruptly reducing our revenue by 40 percent. This continued till the July uprising last year.

We are proud to say that The Daily Star never buckled, thanks to our staff, our board of directors, and the leadership.

The CA's press secretary also laid emphasis on examining not only the past, but also how media covered the events of July-August 2024, now popularly called the Monsoon Revolution. We welcome this decision and thank him for his praise that some media, in spite of severe threats, published prominently the number of students and general people being killed daily.

We also need to examine the politicisation of journalist unions. A special focus should be given on the role of the owners of media houses who used their outlets to eulogise the Hasina government for business purposes, get illegal bank loans, get lucrative contracts, retain untaxed profits, and indulge in money laundering. When directed by the owners, working journalists did not have much of a choice. We think the editors should have tried to prevent that—and failing that, they should have resigned.

Against all the laudable things that are being said about the freedom of media and the present opportunity to engage in independent journalism, we are sad to say that some very disturbing signs can still be seen that are posing a new set of threats against free press.

As of November 2024, as many as 140 journalists have been accused of murder and cases have been filed against them on the basis of their reporting of the student-led mass uprising. Twenty eight journalists have been charged with crime against humanity. We strongly feel that the interim government's treatment of journalists has been sweeping, denigrating, and devoid of the sensitivity that this profession deserves. At this moment, we have the highest number of "murder-accused" journalists in the world. In this situation, how likely is it that the world will believe this government is handling the media fairly? Whatever criticism that this government has so far received from world bodies—Human Rights Watch (HRW), Committee for the Protection of Journalists (CPJ), Reporters without Borders (RSF)—has mostly been for the way journalists are being treated.

It has been several months since the cases against journalists were filed. We know of no progress in terms of verification of the accusations. An eight-member committee by the interim government was formed to monitor harassment cases against journalists on October 27. No progress on this account has been reported till now. All this, while the accused journalists are unable to do their regular jobs, take care of their families, and in some cases pay for their children's education. They are also suffering from social humiliation and leading a life of constant fear, lest they be arrested. For any criminal or unethical action, a journalist must face the law as any other citizen. But everyone must be guaranteed the due process under the law, which is their constitutional right.

We appeal to the interim government, given all their professed commitment to free and independent media, to take an immediate look into the cases against journalists and bring them to an accepted legal standard.

Mahfuz Anam is the editor and publisher of The Daily Star.​

 

[Saif]

Law adviser urges journalists to publish news for public interests

Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Adviser Prof Dr Asif Nazrul has called upon the journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad to publish news for public interests. “Journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad can publish news based on Rules of Procedures for public interest since they used to g

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Law adviser urges journalists to publish news for public interests
BSS
Published :
Feb 23, 2025 17:48
Updated :
Feb 23, 2025 17:48

Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Adviser Prof Dr Asif Nazrul has called upon the journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad to publish news for public interests.

“Journalists covering the Jatiya Sangsad can publish news based on Rules of Procedures for public interest since they used to get them involved in searching news relating to parliament affairs,” he said.

The law adviser made the remarks when a delegation of Bangladesh Parliament Journalists' Association (BPJA) paid a courtesy call on him at his Bangladesh Secretariat office on Sunday.

Noting that effective parliament is the key to democracy, Prof Asif Nazrul advised the journalist leaders to hold view-exchange-meetings and discussions with the political parties on regular basis.

The law adviser enquired about the journalists’ overall activities in the parliament.

BJPA President Harun Jamil and General Secretary Shawkat Ali Litho led the delegation.

Besides, Vice-President Faiz Ullah Bhuiyan, Joint Secretary Mizanur Rahman, Finance Secretary Md Shahjahan Mollah, Office Secretary Nazmul Islam (Tanim Ahmed) and Executive Members - Mashiur Rahman, Monirul Islam and Rafiqul Islam Sabuj were also present on the occasion.

During the meeting, the BPJA leaders said journalists are performing their professional duties for the future of democracy.

The adviser gave a patient hearing to the problems of journalists working in the parliament and assured them of resolving those problems as the best possible time.​

 

[Saif]

Fallen govt destroyed journalism in Bangladesh: Kader Gani Chowdhury

Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists (BFUJ) Secretary General Kader Gani Chowdhury on Tuesday said that the fallen government, i.e. the one led by the Awami League till August 5 last year, has severely damaged journalism in Bangladesh. He said that a certain group of subservient journalist

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Fallen govt destroyed journalism in Bangladesh: Kader Gani Chowdhury
UNB
Published :
Mar 04, 2025 22:19
Updated :
Mar 04, 2025 22:19

Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists (BFUJ) Secretary General Kader Gani Chowdhury on Tuesday said that the fallen government, i.e. the one led by the Awami League till August 5 last year, has severely damaged journalism in Bangladesh.

He said that a certain group of subservient journalists had been created to write false narratives, which has eroded public trust in the media.

"Trust in the media must be restored through truthful journalism. The media is considered the fourth pillar of the state, highlighting its significance and role. It serves as a vigilant guardian by exposing inconsistencies in governance and administration while standing alongside the people's struggles. However, in Bangladesh today, this is hardly happening," he said while exchanging views with journalists at the Khulna Press Club.

He emphasised that journalism faces many challenges, with the greatest being the battle to uphold truth against falsehood, adding, "Risks in journalism will always exist. Overcoming fear is a journalist's duty. However, unethical and yellow journalism is tarnishing the profession's dignity."

Kader Gani further said, "We must remember that the media acts as the state's watchdog. It is not an adversary of the government, administration, or people, but rather a monitor in the public interest."

He mentioned that a bold and robust media is essential for establishing a strong governance system. Even if the other three pillars of the state weaken, a strong fourth pillar can keep the state people-oriented, he added.

The discussion was attended by BFUJ Assistant Secretary General Ehteshamul Haque Shaon, HM Alanuddin, Rashidul Islam, Abdur Razzak Rana, Metropolitan Journalists' Union Khulna President Anisuzzaman, General Secretary Himalaya, and others.​

 

[Saif]

Article 19 urges govt to protect journalists, amend repressive laws

In a statement issued yesterday, Article 19 said Bangladesh’s media landscape faces significant challenges

www.thedailystar.net

Article 19 urges govt to protect journalists, amend repressive laws

Article 19 has called for the government to protect and offer legal support for journalists as well as review and amend repressive laws to ensure the freedom of expression, media freedom, and the safety of journalists.

It also suggested that the government guarantees adequate salaries and benefits for journalists, as these adversely affect the journalists' professional standards.

Article 19, an international human rights organisation, made the recommendations to the Bangladesh Media Reform Commission on February 23, 2025, highlighting necessary legal and policy reforms.

In a statement issued yesterday, Article 19 said Bangladesh's media landscape, though diverse, faces significant challenges due to the lack of legal protections for journalists, media ownership influenced by political affiliations, and high levels of self-censorship.

It called on the interim government to review and amend repressive laws in accordance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

The laws that require review and amendments include the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898; The Bangladesh Television Authority Act 2001, the Telegraph Act 1885 and the Wireless Telegraph Act 1933, the Official Secrets Act 1923, the Censorship of Films Act 1963, the Right to Information Act 2009; the Cyber Security Act 2023, the Printing Presses and Publications (Declaration and Registration) Act 1973.

It also suggested amending the Penal Code 1860, the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Act 2006, Draft Data Protection Act 2025, draft National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2024, the Post Office Act 1869, the Foreign Relations Act 1932, the Special Powers Act 1974, the Prohibition of Indecent Advertisement Act 1963, the Code of Civil Procedure 1909, the Contempt of Court Act 2013 and the Press Council Act 1974.

These acts grant authorities the power to ban or close newspapers and other publications on grounds of defamation, sedition, acts against sovereignty and decency, among others, provide authorities with strict control over TV broadcasting, grant control over the flow of information, put restrictions on journalists – especially those working on public interest issues and even allows surveillance of online activities, and strict control on what information and opinions can be published online

The rights body said journalists' professional standards are being adversely affected by inadequate salaries and benefits.

"It is essential for the government to coordinate with media owners to establish a fair salary structure, secure working conditions, healthcare, retirement benefits, and workplace safety to encourage journalists to work responsibly."

Article 19 said it is crucial that the government create effective mechanisms for legal action against attacks and threats to journalists, as well as to stop false and harassing lawsuits, so they can continue their work independently and without fear.

It called for the government to initiate a national action plan to ensure the safety of female journalists in Bangladesh, in line with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security.

"The government must ensure the free flow of information by avoiding internet shutdowns, content blocking, and filtering, so that citizens' right to internet freedom and access to information is protected."

Article 19 has urged the government to act on these recommendations and foster a media environment that upholds democracy, transparency, and human rights.​

 

[Saif]

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Shafiqul Alam

www.thedailystar.net

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam
Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary says media houses which cannot pay that much should shut operations

Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday.

"Journalists should have a minimum basic salary between Tk 30,000 and Tk 40,000. It can't be less. Whoever pays below it should shut their business," he said at a discussion organised by Multimedia Reporters Association at the National Press Club.

He said journalism has become a bloodsucking industry in Bangladesh. There are many instances that the media owners don't pay journalists properly for years.

"There should be a new movement to increase the salaries of journalists," he said.

"Those who do journalism should be given intellectual property rights and rightly evaluated," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said there was no real media freedom in Bangladesh during the regime of Sheikh Hasina and many journalists played fearless journalism.

"If there are fearless journalists in Bangladesh, they are multimedia journalists and photojournalists. Their contribution to this movement is memorable, but they don't get due recognition," he said.

Those who are very close to the owners or the editors get good salaries, and most other journalists don't get a fair salary. In some cases, it is even between Tk 5,000 and Tk 10,000 a month, he said.

"In the cases of journalists in the countryside, they get very small amount of salary. You are using their videos and earning out of them, but not paying even Tk 500 to them," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said journalists do hazardous job. A few journalists were martyred during the July uprising and a few dozens were injured. They are considered conscience of the society but are not paid properly.

Many of the owners paying poorly to the journalists speak aloud as civil society members Dhaka, which he said, is an irony.

Journalists come to the profession for their passion, but the owners exploit that, he said.

He advocated a movement anew, and blamed the journalist unions for failure, saying that RMG workers are not as educated as journalists are, but they are far better in union activism. They fight for their minimum wage, which is great.

"We are considered conscience of the society, but for decades we remain victims of injustice. Yet, we are not raising our voice for our rights."​

 

[Bilal9]

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Shafiqul Alam

www.thedailystar.net

Basic salary of a journo should be at least Tk 30,000-40,000: Shafiqul Alam
Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary says media houses which cannot pay that much should shut operations

View attachment 15396
Shafiqul Alam

The news organisations who are paying employees less than Tk 30,000-Tk 40,000 as basic salary should be closed, said Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam yesterday.

"Journalists should have a minimum basic salary between Tk 30,000 and Tk 40,000. It can't be less. Whoever pays below it should shut their business," he said at a discussion organised by Multimedia Reporters Association at the National Press Club.

He said journalism has become a bloodsucking industry in Bangladesh. There are many instances that the media owners don't pay journalists properly for years.

"There should be a new movement to increase the salaries of journalists," he said.

"Those who do journalism should be given intellectual property rights and rightly evaluated," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said there was no real media freedom in Bangladesh during the regime of Sheikh Hasina and many journalists played fearless journalism.

"If there are fearless journalists in Bangladesh, they are multimedia journalists and photojournalists. Their contribution to this movement is memorable, but they don't get due recognition," he said.

Those who are very close to the owners or the editors get good salaries, and most other journalists don't get a fair salary. In some cases, it is even between Tk 5,000 and Tk 10,000 a month, he said.

"In the cases of journalists in the countryside, they get very small amount of salary. You are using their videos and earning out of them, but not paying even Tk 500 to them," he said.

Shafiqul Alam said journalists do hazardous job. A few journalists were martyred during the July uprising and a few dozens were injured. They are considered conscience of the society but are not paid properly.

Many of the owners paying poorly to the journalists speak aloud as civil society members Dhaka, which he said, is an irony.

Journalists come to the profession for their passion, but the owners exploit that, he said.

He advocated a movement anew, and blamed the journalist unions for failure, saying that RMG workers are not as educated as journalists are, but they are far better in union activism. They fight for their minimum wage, which is great.

"We are considered conscience of the society, but for decades we remain victims of injustice. Yet, we are not raising our voice for our rights."​

I like this, it will attract better qualified and educated people to the Journalist profession by raising competition.

Remember that guy in CTG - Komol Dey, who couldn't even pronounce Bangla properly, and was screaming all the time. He became a meme of sorts in Bangladesh media.

 

[Saif]

Protests erupt as ‘JaiJai Din’ declaration revoked

The declaration of the daily 'JaiJai Din' has been revoked following an application by its former editor Shafik Rehman, sparking protests from the newspaper's current management and journalists

www.thedailystar.net

Protests erupt as ‘JaiJai Din’ declaration revoked

Photo: UNB

The declaration of the daily 'JaiJai Din' has been revoked following an application by its former editor Shafik Rehman, sparking protests from the newspaper's current management and journalists.

Speaking at a press conference today at Dhaka Reporters' Unity, Kazi Rukunuddin Ahmed, acting editor of the newspaper, along with the current owners and journalists, protested against the illegal occupation of the newspaper's main office and the unjust cancellation of its declaration.

In his written statement, Kazi Rukunuddin said, "A malicious group, with Shafik Rehman in the forefront, has illegally seized the main office and the printing press. They have resorted to lies and deception to continue their conspiracy to seize 'JaiJai Din' from its current owner, Sayed Hossain Chowdhury. We attempted to resolve the matter quietly, keeping in mind the respect for this senior journalist. However, this group is trying to influence the law and the court, constantly distorting truth and fabricated lies."

He also stated, "After the 'JaiJai Din' office and press in Tejgaon Industrial Area were seized, the newspaper continued to print from another press following proper procedures, informing the DC office about the change. Despite this, the DC office, after receiving Shafik Rehman's application, revoked the newspaper's declaration under baseless pretenses."

Kazi Rukunuddin said, "The government has repeatedly emphasised media freedom, yet an influential group has manipulated the system to revoke the declaration of a legally operating media outlet."​

 

[Saif]

Bangladesh advances 16 notches in a year on press freedom index: Mahfuj Alam

Information and Broadcasting Adviser Md Mahfuj Alam today said that Bangladesh has advanced 16 notches in the World Press Freedom Index (WPFI) in a year due to the absence of government interference in the media. He said this while responding to Bangladesh's position in the WPFI published on the

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Bangladesh advances 16 notches in a year on press freedom index: Mahfuj Alam
BSS
Published :
May 02, 2025 23:04
Updated :
May 02, 2025 23:04

Information and Broadcasting Adviser Md Mahfuj Alam today said that Bangladesh has advanced 16 notches in the World Press Freedom Index (WPFI) in a year due to the absence of government interference in the media.

He said this while responding to Bangladesh's position in the WPFI published on the website of Reporters Without Borders (RSF), according to a press release signed by Public Relations Officer (PRO) of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Md Mamun Or Rashid on Friday.

Referring to the interim government's initiatives to establish media freedom, the adviser said that all media outlets in the country, including Bangladesh Betar and Bangladesh Television, are now free from government influence.

The government is not interfering in any media organisation by making telephone calls, he added.

The government has already taken several initiatives to free and strengthen the country's media, he said, adding that Bangladesh's 16-place advancement in the WPFI proves that the government is working to free and strengthen the country's media.

Mahfuj Alam said that several reform activities will be undertaken very soon as per the recommendations of the Media Reform Commission.

The adviser expressed the hope that Bangladesh will move a few steps further in the WPFI next year and the rights of the country's journalists and media professionals will be protected.

Bangladesh has been ranked 149th out of 180 countries in the WPFI-2025, published on the website of the Paris-based organisation RSF on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day on May 3.

Bangladesh’s rank was 165th in the index last year.

Neighbouring India is staying two places below Bangladesh’s position in the index this year, securing 151st place.

When the Awami League government took office in 2009, Bangladesh’s position was 121st in the index.

During the Awami League's rule, Bangladesh has slipped 44 places in the index in the last 15 years.​

 

[Saif]

Govt wants healthy competition among newspapers: Info Adviser

Information and Broadcasting Adviser Md. Mahfuz Alam said the government encourages healthy competition among newspapers and wants to see the industry thrive through ethical practices. “The government wants to see healthy competition among newspapers. Certain negative practices still exist i

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Govt wants healthy competition among newspapers: Info Adviser
FE Online Desk
Published :
May 08, 2025 21:27
Updated :
May 08, 2025 21:27

Information and Broadcasting Adviser Md. Mahfuz Alam said the government encourages healthy competition among newspapers and wants to see the industry thrive through ethical practices.

“The government wants to see healthy competition among newspapers. Certain negative practices still exist in the industry, and these must come to an end,” he told a view-exchange meeting with the Newspaper Owners’ Association of Bangladesh (NOAB) at the ministry’s conference room on Thursday.

The adviser said, “We have already begun implementing the recommendations of the Media Reform Commission. We seek cooperation of all stakeholders to implement these reforms.”

The adviser expressed concern over persisting negative trends in the print media sector, urging all stakeholders to shun such practices, reports BSS.

During the meeting, NOAB President A.K. Azad said that over the past 12-13 years, both the circulation and advertising revenue of print newspapers have significantly declined.

“Over the past 12 to 13 years, both newspaper circulation and advertising revenue have significantly declined. Despite being a service industry, newspapers are burdened with a 27.5% corporate tax. We propose reducing it to 10% to help the sector survive,” he said.

Azad also stressed the need for restructuring the Wage Board and proposed the formation of the board through a search committee to ensure transparency and fairness.

Prothom Alo Editor Matiur Rahman praised the Media Reform Commission’s report and emphasized the urgency of implementing its actionable recommendations.

Commenting on government-media relations, the editor said the current government is not attempting to intimidate the press.

In the meeting, NOAB proposed the establishment of a permanent Media Commission to oversee long-term reforms and stability in the sector.

Editors from leading national dailies, including Daily Star Mahfuz Anam, The Daily Sangbad Altaf Mas Kabir, The Financial Express Shamsul Haque Zahid and The Daily Karatoa editor Mozammel Haque, were present at the discussion.​