[🇧🇩] Reforms carried out by the interim/future Govts.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saif
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 135
  • Views Views 1K
[🇧🇩] Reforms carried out by the interim/future Govts.
135
1K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense Forum

Need proper reforms before election
Says Jamaat ameer

1727568220884.png

Shafiqur Rahman. Photo: Collected

Jamaat-e-Islami Ameer Shafiqur Rahman yesterday said they want the country to go through proper reforms before an election.

An acceptable election can only be held after a thorough reform, he said.

He was speaking as chief guest in a rally, organised by Pabna district unit of Jamaat, held at the Pabna Edward College yesterday afternoon.

"We want to give a logical amount of time to the interim government before holding the election so that they can make proper reforms in different sectors. Through the path of such reforms, we can have a fair and acceptable election," said Dr Shafiqur.

The roadmap for the reformation should be fixed after holding discussions with political parties, he also said.

Appreciating the initiative of the interim government, the Jamaat Ameer said this government has been formed through a revolution, so they have to do a lot.

"If the interim government fails, then the entire nation will fail. So they have to be successful, and we have to help this government for the sake of proper reformation," he added.

Shafiqur also said they have forgiven Awami League for oppressing their party, but they will never forgive the mass killings conducted by the AL government.

"We want justice for every killing," he said.

The party's district unit ameer Abu Taleb Mondol chaired the rally.

Earlier, Sahfiqur met with the families of the martyred students during the student movement in Pabna.​
 

State reforms not possible with AL cohorts in admin: Rizvi

1727568327944.png


BNP Senior Joint Secretary General Ruhul Kabir Rizvi Ahmed today said it will not be possible to make state reforms keeping cohorts of Awami League in various key positions of administration.

He made the remarks while addressing a memorial meeting held for Shaheed Jahiduzzaman Tanvir, who was shot dead by police firing during anti-discrimination student movement, in the capital's Dakshinkhan.

Rizvi said around 2,000 people were killed in the last 36 days till the ouster of fascist Sheikh Hasina's regime during the July-August movement.

Those who opened fire on common people to protect Hasina's regime are still holding various key positions, he said.

The BNP leader demanded removal of cohorts of AL before making any reforms saying state reforms cannot be possible without bringing the killers to book.

He said AL enforced authoritarian rule seizing the people's voting rights and finally it wanted to cling into power by killing students and general masses.

Those who carried out carnage must be brought to justice, otherwise, souls of the martyrs won't get peace, he said.

About Bangladesh, India relations, Rizvi said: "At first India will have to respect our independence and sovereignty as a friend, leaving aside their lordship attitude".

He said when the entire world rejected Sheikh Hasina's one-party election, only India supported it.

"The border between Bangladesh and India is seen as the bloodiest one. The days of bowing down to India has come to an end. The people of Bangladesh will never be on their knees again," he said.

He urged the interim government to hold a free, fair and neutral election after making required reforms.​
 

Will reforms be possible without placing Awami League on trial?
Kazi Zawad
Updated: 28 Sep 2024, 17: 44

1727570921416.png


After a bit of prevarication, General Ershad came along and imposed martial law in March 1982. Bangladesh attained an 18-point bouquet to cleanse the society by means of pure democracy and reforms. As part of this, the weekly Bichitra was told to write a report on administrative reforms. And it was to highlight the importance of the armed forces in running the state in the style of Indonesia's Golkar. A colonel was then in charge of reforms (read: 'control').

Shahadat bhai (editor Shahadat Chowdhury) gave me the task of writing this cover story. He told me to visit the Indonesian embassy and gather details of Golkar and the government. I was not too pleased about having to write this tailored article about the "democracy-loving" military junta. So while rebellion brewed in my heart, I set to the task for the sake of Bichitra and my job.

When it comes to reforms, the first task in implementing reforms will be to have a workforce in place, in the administration in all areas, committed to the new government

In 1964, a group of army officers close to Indonesia's first president Sukarno formed the 'party of functional groups' or Golkar as a counter to the Communist Party. And it was based on this that president Suharto took over state power in 1967 and continued his autocratic rule for 30 years.

I went to the Indonesian embassy and picked up a booklet on their government programmes and some scenic pictures of the Bali sea beach. None of this was related to the topic of my cover story. As a student I had an inclination towards left-leaning politics. I had learnt about rural communes at the time. I mixed that with some imagination and wrote about local government at the thana level in a parliamentary system. The significant aspect of this was that there would be an opposition leader in the thana council. If any political activist was to be arrested, that leader's approval would be required. The local government would have authority regarding the jobs of government officials. That would abolish the dominance of bureaucrats over the people's representatives.

The report did not fulfill the wishes of the authorities. The military bosses had wanted one thing and got another. From this experience of mine I want to say, no matter what the interim government wants or what aspirations the people have from the mass uprising, it is the will of those who are to carry out the reforms that is most important.

The interim government has, in the meantime, formed six commissions for reforms. Based on the people's aspirations as expressed in various ways, the commissions will come up with recommendations. The question is, who will implement these recommendations? Basically it will be the civil servants who were appointed and benefitted by the autocratic government. Can we be assured of their allegiance and integrity? How do we know that they won't reform the recommendations and apply them as they please? So when it comes to reforms, the first task in implementing reforms will be to have a workforce in place, in the administration in all areas, committed to the new government.

The government has put their hope in the officers and employees who have been "deprived" over the 16 years of autocracy. But in the meantime we have already got an inkling of their mindsets and behaviour. The deprived persons may include those who were sympathetic towards the autocrat but were not skilled in sycophancy. Political smears do not give deprived officers a clean chit of merit and efficiency.

A certain matter must be made clear concerning people's expectations about placing the autocratic government on trial. There is a question that it was not the individual Hasina that people wanted to be removed, but the party with whose support she managed to become an autocrat. The attorney general had said in parliament that there was no scope to ban the party. The question then is whether only one individual is guilty of autocratic activities? Does the party have no liability? Can a party not be placed on trial? There has been a proposal to amend the law pertaining to crimes against humanity and then to ban the party for 10 years.

In this context, we may recall that after World War II, the Nazi leaders' Reich cabinet, the Gestapo, SA, SS, SD and German armed forces Wehrmacht, etc, were brought to trial. That means a party can be tried too. Awami League was the party in charge during the 15 years of autocratic rule and so it must be tried.

If the party is to be tried, then the question may arise whether it can then be banned. Parties have been banned on past allegations. No one raised questions of trial then. But for the sake of justice, a trial must be held.

I would like to mention two international examples here. In December 1999 the Venice Commission, officially European Commission for Democracy through Law, set guidelines for the prohibition of any political party in Europe. The fifth recommendation mentioned that before approaching the court or relevant agency for the banning of a political party, it must be determined whether the party is actually a threat to free and democratic political system or individual rights.

Germany also has a law that says a political party will be declared unconstitutional if its objective is to spurn or destroy democratic norms and to use its supporters to that end. In 2017 the constitutional court of that country ruled that the political objective of the party NDP was to abolish fundamental democratic rights.

Can a law be formulated on the basis of those two laws and justice be brought about regarding the massacre and autocratic activities that were used to repress the people of this country? If there is such a law in place, perhaps the party's supporters, leaders and workers can obstruct the autocratic ambitions of any individual in fear that their party may be banned. I propose that this trial be carried out not by the International Crimes Tribunal but by a constitutional court formed for the purpose.

Actually the people want justice for all the injustice that has taken place for so long. Implementing their aspirations to this end would be the most important reform.

* Kazi Zawad is a journalist​
 

“Reform must come from the people”
In conversation with philosopher and poet Farhad Mazhar

1727655747332.png

Farhad Mazhar. Photo : ZIAUDDIN SHIPLU

The Daily Star (TDS): Could you offer your reflections on the 2024 uprising, particularly in comparison to the 1969 Mass Uprising and the 1990 Anti-Authoritarian Movement?

Farhad Mazhar (FM):
The 1969 Mass Uprising was primarily focused on achieving either provincial autonomy or independence, which ultimately led to the Liberation War in 1971. At that time, we demanded a provincial government based on the Six Points, advocating for Pakistan to become a federal state where East Pakistan could enjoy greater autonomy. This demand transformed into a call for independence following the Pakistani Army's brutal Operation Searchlight on March 25, 1971. The 1969 uprising was fundamentally about political and economic autonomy and later the creation of a new nation.

In contrast, the mass movement of 2024 is centered around state-building based on popular sovereignty. Its core aim to dismantle the existing fascist state and the structures of authoritarian and fascistic power by organizing the people as the central political force. This movement seeks to launch a constitutive process to draft a new constitution based on the will of the people. Thus paving the way for the establishment of true democracy—a fundamentally different kind of state power and governance. It's important that the movement also aims to deconstruct and dismantle the false ideology of election as democracy. Elections are merely mechanisms for practicing democracy, and what we need is to install the democratic state first and practice election as a decision making process at various levels of state craft as required by the constitution. When a democratic state is installed, elections are important to its functioning and remain akin to the will of the people.

In Bangladesh, however, elections have often been equated with democracy, which is a misconception and the major ideological challenge for the people's movement that we have been facing for long time. Elections alone do not ensure democracy. We often fail to learn from history that fascist regimes rose through elections and constituted as fascist power based on nationalism and populism. In the absence of a powerful ideological struggle against nationalisms and various undemocratic religious and secular tendencies, so called election as democracy ends up in populism and fascism, as we saw in Europe in the past. We must learn from Germany, Italy, Spain, Chile, and now from India. Hitler, Mussolini and Sheikh Hasina all came to power via elections. Those advocating for elections and preaching election as democracy in the current context of Bangladesh are, in effect, perpetuating fascism because they are pushing for the continuation of authoritarian rule under the guise of electoral legitimacy.

TDS: What steps should be taken to initiate the process of drafting a new constitution?

FM:
First, we must declare the existing constitution null and void. Dr. Mohammad Yunus, as Chief Adviser of the interim government, is advising President Mohammed Shahabuddin Chuppu, who was appointed by the fascist regime and served under the fascist government. This indicates that the mass uprising remains under the legal and constitutional mechanism and control of the fascist power. Did people sacrifice their lives for this outcome? Therefore, the first step is to declare a new president reflecting the sovereign will of the people firmly based on the political and legal paradigm of popular sovereignty, annul the existing constitution, and remove Mohammed Shahabuddin.

Second, we must review the top army officers appointed by Sheikh Hasina. If it is found that they remain loyal to her or Tarique Siddique rather than the people of Bangladesh, they must be removed. Should the Army Chief choose to support the people, he must show a positive attitude, as there were moments when soldiers refused to fire on civilians. Many in the army demonstrated solidarity with the people, forming a new alliance among students, citizens, and soldiers. This is the essence of people's power.

Dr. Yunus or a similarly chosen figure should be appointed as head of state. Afterward, the president must undertake two crucial tasks. First, he must ensure Bangladesh operates under existing laws and regulations, except for those that are colonial, enacted by Sheikh Hasina, or violate human rights. Examples include the Digital Security Act (DSA), laws regarding the RAB, or the colonial-era Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). We may proclaim that any law that violates the international human rights regimes will be considered null and void and the state will function as it is functioning now, until we draft a new constitution.

Finally, the president must declare an interim period to draft a new constitution. The political parties and the people must give him time to begin this work. The interim government must provide ample space for political parties free from fascist ideology and practice, to participate at all levels of discussions. Elections should be held for a constituent assembly rather than simply a regular election to elect government. This process should begin with local-level meetings—at the division, upazila, or even union level—where people can voice their vision for the state and their expectations. Political parties, too, will present their ideas for the nation's future.

The people are not an abstract entity but rather possess a deep political understanding in their own way, not necessarily adhering to the expectations of the educated elite. A National Constitution Council will draft the constitution based on the suggestions proposed by the people, which will later be legitimized by an elected National Constituent Assembly. Our aim is to create a charter founded on human dignity, equality, and social justice.

Many might think that I am an ultra-leftist, convinced by the Bolshevik model, but our reality is quite distinct from that of Russia. Instead, we may look at China as our economic model, if not for the political ideals. We are in dire need of economic development that has been thwarted by the new liberal capitalist global order, dominated by few transnational corporation. We must free ourselves from old petti-bourgeois utopian socialist ideals that breed underdevelopment and fascism. We must invent policies that promote accelerated economic transformation and secure for us a strong economic position in the international division of labor. So we have a very challenging task to engage with global capital and globalization that is not possible by conventional economic ideologies and externally prescribed economic policies. We cannot remain perpetually poor and deprived of technology. We must find ways for the transfer of science, technology, the art of management and efficient governance and appropriate social relations and forms to remain cohesive and strong. As you know, China rapidly advanced toward economic development immediately after 1976, and it is quite possible that we could similarly develop ourselves within a very short period of time.

We are rich in natural, biological, aquatic and human resources that accompany historically accumulated local knowledge system. These will be the key to our massive economic upheaval. Once the people are convinced that they are part of a massive state and nation-building project the people's revolution will be able to realize the aspiration of the people. We are an emerging political community endowed with powerful political agency, pragmatic ambitions and a clear goal to chart a path for ourselves in the global economy. No one could stop Bangladesh to emerge as a powerful country. People are willing to sacrifice their lives for their dreams and ambitions. We have seen that in the July Revolution.

1727655824033.png

Students are protesting in front of Shaheed Minar on 3rd August. Photo: Amran Hossain

TDS: Do you see any significant changes in the post-uprising period?

FM:
The anti-fascist spirit remains strong and active among the people. As an activist intellectual, my main focus is to sustain that intense desire for societal transformation and facilitate dialogue with others. I am not alone in this revolutionary passion; many others share the same drive.

Democracy, at its core, depends on the collective will of the people, as seen in constitutional preambles like "We, the people of the USA" and "We, the people of Bangladesh." It's crucial to emphasize that the people have agency. They are not apolitical; through their united action, they overthrew the fascist regime. However, it's also true that some individuals supported the fascist regime.

This brings up the need for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), akin to the one in South Africa after the anti-apartheid struggle led by Nelson Mandela. Such a commission should have been established right after the people took control of state power in Bangladesh. The urgency for a TRC stems from the fact that not all Awami League supporters are fascists; some are genuinely committed to democracy.

Amidst all of this, we tend to overlook critical questions, such as the nature of heinous institutions like Aynaghar, about which we still know a very little as citizens.

And why isn't Dr. Yunus engaging in dialogue with civil society? While we recognize his contributions, he must also listen to the people, otherwise it will eventually damage his acceptability. The state is a political entity with complex processes that require broad engagement.

TDS: How do you foresee the South Asian political landscape evolving in light of the recent developments in Bangladesh?

FM
: Our relationship with India differs significantly from our ties with the USA. Unfortunately, the interim government lacks experts who fully understand these geopolitical nuances. A faction within Delhi's foreign policy circles, including the BJP, perceives India's bilateral relationship with Bangladesh is based on a flawed premise. Instead of people-to-people relations, India maintained relations as a state to the individual leader of a fascist regime. That's wrong.

Despite these challenges, we must work towards establishing a constructive and positive bilateral relationship with the people of India, considering the geopolitical subtleties and regional dynamics. We need to approach this with political acumen, clearly identifying which aspects of India's policy we support and which we oppose. It's crucial to bridge the gap between the people of Bangladesh and India, especially to counter any misconceptions about the treatment of minorities in Bangladesh.

As someone who engages closely with students concerned about the country, I haven't noticed any baseless or irrational anti-Indian sentiment among them. The dissatisfaction many Bangladeshis feel is largely due to India's perceived injustice and oppression towards its Muslim population, which is understandable. Additionally, India's refusal to shelter Muslim refugees contrasts sharply with our own acceptance of Rohingyas. To alleviate this discontent in Bangladesh, India needs to address its treatment of Muslims within its borders. Continued aggression will have negative repercussions for India.

From a broader perspective, our goal is to live peacefully within the subcontinent, which is a fundamental principle. However, if India maintains its current stance, it could provoke and intensify anti-Indian sentiments in Bangladesh, potentially mobilizing forces against India. This would place responsibility squarely on India. Policymakers must therefore work to prevent such outcomes.

TDS: There is much talk about political reforms. What are the essential steps to achieve genuine reform?

FM:
The people of Bangladesh must understand that we cannot rely on external help; no one will come to our rescue. We need to build a genuine consensus among the populace to move forward effectively. Herein lies my fundamental disagreement with our political parties. They may profess a commitment to reform, but they are not equipped to drive real change. Reform must come from the people, with political parties providing support rather than leading. Had the political parties acted responsibly, we wouldn't be in this crisis today. Political parties are not above the people, which they often imagine and try to impose; they are an extension of the people and their existence depends on the people.

We should consider forming a Reconciliation and Reconstitution Council that includes political parties. Our role would be to engage in discussions with them while respecting the interim government's responsibilities—interference should only occur if the government acts against the will of the people. Additionally, we must confront any remaining fascists within the bureaucracy, police, and army. Political parties should encourage their members to support the authentic path to democracy. This process should be completed hopefully within a year, as our goals are clear.

Engaging the public will naturally involve political parties. By establishing committees at the Upazila level, we ensure their inclusion. Integrating political parties is essential for building a new state. We should facilitate discussions and possibly hold seminars to gather ideas and solutions, as this is a collective issue that transcends any single party. Our aim is to resolve these issues swiftly.

To be continued.....................​
 
TDS: It seems the interim government is not adequately addressing the people's demands, and there is a perceived void, as political parties are claiming that this government has not provided a clear roadmap. How do you evaluate the situation?

FM:
It's unjust to place the responsibility for creating a roadmap solely on the interim government. The initiative should come from the political parties themselves. Why are the political parties failing to put forward their own roadmap? It's contradictory to expect the interim government to provide a plan while leaving the task of reform to the political parties.

I've published seven critical articles on the BNP's proposals for state reform, which are available on my website. None of the BNP members have contested my views. If political parties refuse to listen to public feedback and dismiss criticism while demanding a roadmap from the government without offering their own, how can they claim to be a legitimate agency to lead the people? They need to outline their plans to the people, earn their trust, and secure their votes.

Furthermore, we still have bureaucrats who were involved in significant corruption and remain loyal to the Awami League. Why haven't we replaced them? What's stopping us from promoting capable young bureaucrats aged 30 to 32? If they are competent, why not consider them for senior positions like secretary?

TDS: How does the July movement stand to shape narratives related to the 1971 Liberation Movement?

FM:
The independence movement of 1971 is a non-negotiable issue! It clearly and historically marks us as a political community different from Islamic Pakistan, and in 1947 we marked ourselves as different from Hindu India. I fundamentally reject the prevailing narrative about the events of 1971.

It's crucial to differentiate between independence and liberation. Liberation involves the creation of a politically empowered community, whereas independence merely signifies control over territory without fully realising statehood and its essential structures. Collective self-consciousness as the driving historical agency is not easy to achieve and realize. This is why I am so keen on literature, art, culture and the critique of theology and traditions. So I squarely place emphasis on the appropriate articulations between Bangla language, Bangla culture, pre-Islamic history and the religions. To progress, we must challenge the conventional Awami League (AL) narrative that 1971 was the culmination of our journey. No. It is only the beginning. We must integrate the golden history of Islam both in its place of origin and its arrival in the subcontinent and contribute to building powerful foundational imaginations and structures in our own language, and culture integrating the traditions and legacies we carry within us from pre-Islamic era. We must cultivate a critical, historical and creative mind that keeps us united and altered to our collective self-consciousness as the agent of world history, and not slaves of colonial, imperialist ideologies and power.

The intellectual shortcomings of the Awami narrative become apparent when we consider the constitution's adoption, which was driven more by the preferences of lawyers and bureaucrats than by the general will of the people formed by the collective self-consciousness as I discussed earlier. The Constitution is not a legal document, as naive lawyers usually think. To constitute is the most important political act through which a political community arrive to world history and contributes to the collective good of humanity and world history and planetary survival as a life form.

The core demands of the 1971 movement—equality, human dignity, and social justice—must now be actively pursued. Following the July uprising, Bangladesh has the chance to advance towards these goals. At this pivotal moment, we must address issues related to laws, culture, tradition, religion, and history to move forward effectively. Most importantly, we must learn to imagine ourselves as a unique political community and our existence is not negotiable.

The interview was taken by Shamsuddoza Sajen of The Daily Star.
 

Dissolution of textbook committee shows fault lines in reform drive
Hate campaign against two teachers deeply troubling

1727656373964.png

VISUAL: STAR

The row over the composition of a textbook revision coordination committee over the last few days has exposed a fault line in the government's ongoing reform drive, underscoring the challenges it faces as it prepares for more critical reforms, especially surrounding the question of religion in the constitution. On Saturday, the government dissolved the committee after facing backlash from certain groups for the lack of Islamic scholars in the 10-member committee and alleged "anti-religious" views held by its two members. The development, and the manner in which the authorities have acquiesced, underline a dilemma that has long plagued the state: how to balance progressive reforms with the expectations of religious constituencies that still hold significant sway.

The education adviser has denied the decision had anything to do with the pressure, stressing that there was no need for such a committee as specialists from both Islamic and general streams of education are "at the final stage of revising textbooks." But why form a committee then and disband it only after 13 days? The episode suggests that the government may be susceptible to yielding to conservative pressure in its reform initiatives. It also brought into focus the broader question about the role of religion in state affairs, with the fallen Awami League regime setting a trend of exploiting and appeasing fundamentalist elements for political gains. One may recall how pressure from religious groups led to the removal of certain stories and topics from school textbooks. Nothing much has changed even after the regime's ouster.

If we analyse the criticisms directed at the two Dhaka University teachers, it is clear that those had nothing to do with education or their qualifications, but only their perceived beliefs. Many have even indulged in a hate campaign online to the point that it sparked concerns about the safety of the teachers. Dissolving the committee, without critically evaluating the criticisms or doing nothing about those indulging in hate speech, also cast doubt about the government's commitment to such reforms. Are we to accept that any group can influence or reverse much-needed reforms through public agitation?

We must acknowledge the importance of ensuring a balanced and inclusive curriculum, one that reflects the cultural and religious diversity of the nation. But decisions on curriculum revisions must be based on academic merit and pedagogical principles, not political pressures. The government must realise that yielding to such pressures is contributing to an atmosphere where education is increasingly getting detached from the objective of nurturing critical thinking which it is supposed to do. We must not allow our education system to regress under the weight of such undue pressures any longer.​
 

Prof Yunus expresses resolve for quick reform, election

1727656532214.png

File photo

Chief Adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh Professor Muhammad Yunus has expressed his determination to advance reform and hold an election quickly.

Prof Yunus made the remarks in an interview with Tokyo-based news outlet NHK WORLD in New York, where he went to attend the United Nations General Assembly, it reports on Sunday.

He became chief adviser of the interim government after the administration of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina collapsed in August after 15 years in power, following student protests.

Yunus is the founder of Grameen Bank, which extends small unsecured loans to underprivileged people. He and the bank won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006.

In the interview, Yunus said the interim government's job is to carry out reform as quickly as possible, and that the government will hold an election as soon as it is ready.

He said, "Failure is not something that we can accept."

Referring to students who played a major role in the overthrow of the Hasina government, Yunus said young people gave their lives during what he called the "revolution".

He indicated his stance of including the young generation in policy making.

The chief adviser said Bangladesh looks forward to support from its biggest donor Japan "during this very critical period".

He emphasised that Japan's cooperation is essential in rebuilding his country's economy and helping democracy take root there.​
 

Dialogue with parties before reform bodies start working
Staff Correspondent 30 September, 2024, 21:40

1727745132817.png

Chief adviser’s press secretary Shafiqul Alam, centre, speaks at a press briefing, flanked by deputy press secretaries Mohammad Abul Kalam Azad Majumder and Apurba Jahangir, at Foreign Service Academy in Dhaka on Monday. | BSS photo

The advisory council of the interim government will hold another round of dialogue with the political parties before the six reform commissions begin their work in full swing.

‘The dialogue will be held very soon,’ the chief adviser’s press secretary Shafiqul Alam told a press conference at the Foreign Service Academy in the capital on Monday.

The press conference was organised to brief the media about chief adviser Muhammad Yunus’s participation in the United Nations General Assembly in the past week.

Shafiqul called the chief adviser’s visit highly successful and historic.

In his address to the nation on September 11, Yunus announced the formation of six commissions for reforms in the electoral system, police, judiciary, public administration, constitution and Anti-Corruption Commission.

Badiul Alam Majumder will head the electoral system reform commission; Safar Raz Hossain will head the police reform commission; Justice Shah Abu Naeem Mominur Rahman will head the judiciary reform commission; Iftekharuzzaman will lead the Anti-Corruption Commission reform commission; Abdul Mueed Chowdhury will lead the public administration reform commission; and prominent lawyer Shahdeen Malik was first announced to head the Constitution Reform Commission to be later replaced by professor Ali Riaz.

According to the announcement of the interim government, the commissions were supposed to start work from today (October 1).

The formation of six reform commissions, however, has not been gazetted yet.

The government has asked the commissions to complete their work and submit reports by December 31.

Responding to questions from the journalists at the Monday press conference, the chief adviser’s press secretary said that the reform commissions were scheduled to start their work from today.

‘But before they start their work the advisory council wants to hold another round of discussions with the political parties,’ he said.

Shafiqul remarked that with the announcement of the names of the commission heads their work had started to some extent.

‘Since political parties are a stakeholder here, the commissions will discuss with them and ask for their opinion,’ he said.

The press secretary at the briefing also highlighted the chief adviser’s meetings with high-level delegations, including US president Joe Biden and many other heads of states and governments, regarding obtaining loans.

Referring to an interview of Yunus given to the New York Times in New York, Sahfiqul Alam said that the chief adviser would not contest in the next polls and he had no wish to join politics.

Responding to a question, he said that there was no discussion about the interim government’s timeframe during the visit.

‘The timeframe of the interim government would be determined by the people of Bangladesh,’ he added.

The chief adviser’s deputy press secretary Mohammad Abul Kalam Azad Majumder and Apurba Jahangir were also present at the press conference.​
 

Full commission on constitutional reforms formed

1728348164085.png


The government yesterday formed a full commission to make recommendations on constitutional reforms.

The commission was constituted after Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus approved it, according to a gazette notification.

Prof Ali Riaz leads the commission.

Eight other members include Dhaka University law professors Sumaiya Khair and Muhammad Ekramul Haque; lawyers Imran Siddique, Sharif Bhuiyan, and Moin Alam Ferozi; writer Firoz Ahmed; rights activist Mustain Billah; and student representative Mahfuj Alam, who is also the special assistant to the chief adviser.

In his speech to the nation on 11 September, Prof Yunus announced the formation of six commissions to reform the electoral system, police, judiciary, public administration, the constitution, and the Anti-Corruption Commission.

Initially, prominent lawyer Shahdeen Malik was named as the head of the Constitutional Reform Commission, but later he was replaced by Prof Ali Riaz.

On October 3, the government formed five commissions to reform the public administration, ACC, judiciary, police, and the electoral system.​
 

State reforms: CA to hold 2nd round of talks with parties October 19

1729039021033.png

Photo: Courtesy/UNB

Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus will hold talks on reforms with some political parties on October 19.

His dialogue is aimed at advancing the reform process, said Abul Kalam Azad Majumder, deputy press secretary to the CA.

At a press conference held at the Foreign Service Academy yesterday, he said that the Gonoforum, Bangladesh Jatiya Party, 12-Party Alliance, Liberal Democratic Party, Jatiya Mukti Council, Labour Party, the alliance of like-minded nationalist parties, and some others will be invited to the dialogue.

Asked if the Jatiya Party would be invited, he said the chief adviser's dialogue with political parties is an ongoing process, and a decision regarding the JP's invitation would be made later.

On October 5, Prof Yunus held talks with the BNP, Jamaat-e-Islami, Ganatantra Mancha, Left Democratic Alliance, Hefazat-e-Islam, Islami Andolon Bangladesh, and Amar Bangladesh (AB) Party.

Responding to another query, Azad yesterday said the interim government is unaware of any "minus two" formula. "There have been no discussions about this in any government meetings, and there is no likelihood of such an issue being discussed."

As a journalist sought his comment on the BNP's recent statement that it did not want to see another "minus-two" attempt, the deputy press secretary said, "Please ask the BNP what they have said and why."

'IDENTIFYING SYNDICATES'

Talking about syndicates of traders, Azad said the interim government was working to identify the syndicates to check the price hike of essentials.

"Efforts are on to identify and bust the syndicates of traders. We are seeking your [journalists] cooperation. If you have information on the syndicates who are manipulating prices, let us know about it. If you cooperate with the government by providing information, the government will of course take steps."

He said 99 percent garment factories are open now.

Mentioning that ordinary people are worried about the price hike of essentials, Azad said the government has already taken some steps to bring down the prices to an affordable level.

"The price of eggs is going up. A decision has been made today [yesterday] to reduce the duty on egg imports to 13 percent from 33 percent."

The deputy press secretary said the government has decided to cut the duty on edible oil imports by five percent and withdraw VAT on its production and supply.

He said the government has started selling agricultural products, including potato, onion and vegetables, at affordable prices under an Open Market Sale (OMS) programme at different places in the capital.

The products are now being sold at 20 points and the number will be increased later.

Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Safiqul Alam was present at the press briefing.​
 

EU ready to support reform agenda: new envoy
Staff Correspondent 15 October, 2024, 21:01

1729040627463.png

New European Union ambassador to Bangladesh Michael Miller pays an introductory courtesy call on foreign affairs adviser Md Touhid Hossain at his Segun Bagicha office in Dhaka on Tuesday. | Press release

The new European Union ambassador to Bangladesh Michael Miller on Tuesday expressed the EU’s readiness to support the reform agenda of the interim government, led by professor Muhammad Yunus.

During an introductory courtesy call on foreign affairs adviser Md Touhid Hossain at his office in Segun Bagicha, Miller offered the EU’s full cooperation in areas such as human rights, good governance, and the democratic process, according to a foreign ministry press release.

The EU envoy highlighted the recent student-led mass uprising as an unprecedented opportunity for change in Bangladesh.

Miller also stated that the EU was keen to diversify trade relations with Bangladesh by increasing investment, and it supported the country’s transition following its graduation from the Least Developed Country status.

In response, the foreign adviser welcomed the EU’s support and assured efforts to create a better business environment to strengthen trade and investment relations.

Describing Bangladesh-EU relations as vibrant and important, Touhid Hossain requested EU assistance in the health and education sectors, with a particular focus on improving technical and vocational training institutes.

He also stressed the need for support in recovering stolen assets deposited abroad by some Bangladeshi nationals, to which the EU ambassador offered technical assistance.

Miller informed the adviser about the European Investment Bank’s ongoing 900 million investment in Bangladesh’s rail, energy, water, and health sectors. He expressed the EIB’s readiness to increase its investment portfolio in the country.

Both the adviser and the ambassador welcomed the forthcoming discussion on a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, which aims to elevate Bangladesh-EU relations to new heights.

The EU ambassador reaffirmed the EU’s continued assistance for the Rohingya refugees and host communities in Cox’s Bazar.

Both parties agreed that the return of the Rohingyas to Myanmar, with rights and safety guaranteed, remained the only sustainable solution to the ongoing crisis.​
 

Reforms require unity among our politicians
People yearn for leaders capable of rooting out corruption, challenging harmful traditions, and fostering unity for the betterment of Bangladesh

1729812451233.png

VISUAL: ANWAR SOHEL

In a recent interview with Prothom Alo, Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus urged the nation, "Unite for reforms. We must not hold the election without carrying out reforms. That is my appeal to everyone. Do not lose this opportunity." His appeal captures a sentiment shared by millions: emphasising that reforms must precede elections if democracy is to thrive in Bangladesh. For too long, elections have been treated as rituals to renew power, not as opportunities for meaningful change. Since independence, no government in Bangladesh has fully lived up to the expectations of its people. Despite repeated promises, successive administrations have failed to deliver on their commitments. This persistent failure has fuelled widespread disillusionment, with many citizens now seeing politics as a self-serving enterprise rather than a means of public service. The growing mistrust reflects a deeper crisis within the political system, raising a crucial question: what do the people of Bangladesh truly expect from their leaders?

The people of Bangladesh expect politicians to be honest, accountable, and dedicated to public service. They want leaders to create a safe and fair environment where they can live and work without fear of bribery or extortion. People also expect politicians to focus on important matters like economic growth, healthcare, and education. Sadly, most politicians seem more interested in criticising opponents, using harsh words and weak arguments. People also hope for fair prices of essential goods and reliable access to basic services such as water, electricity, and gas, so people from all income levels can live with dignity. They want freedom of speech to be protected, allowing them to speak out without fear of retaliation. Citizens are tired of promises made during election campaigns that are never kept—they expect politicians to deliver on their commitments through fair and responsible leadership that upholds the law and ensures institutions serve everyone equally. Unfortunately, there is a wide gap between these expectations and the political reality in Bangladesh.

For the past three decades, Bangladesh's political landscape has been dominated by two major players: the Awami League (AL) and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). Despite their longstanding dominance, these parties have failed to reach a consensus on any matter of national, political, social or economic importance that could genuinely benefit the country. Their ideological divisions are stark, but ironically, their main goal remains the same—winning elections and holding on to power—at any cost. Both parties have followed the same playbook when they were in opposition: boycotting parliament, inciting violent protests, and damaging public and private property, all in the name of democratic rights. They claim to uphold democracy, but their actions suggest otherwise. Their internal structures remain highly autocratic, and most decisions are made based on the personal preferences of the party president/chairperson. There is little room for new ideas or input from others, which stifles political progress and power stays within a small circle of individuals.

Politics in Bangladesh, once considered a noble calling, has now become a fast track to wealth and power. For some, it serves as a family legacy; for others, it is a shortcut to personal enrichment. While corruption has always existed in politics, the current scale and openness of it are alarming. Many politicians control local territories, rig public contracts, and engage in various illegal activities, including land grabbing, sand mining, extortion from street vendors and the transport sector, and running drugs and gambling operations. A Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) report reveals that corruption in the Roads and Highways Department alone has cost the nation nearly Tk 50,835 crore over the past 15 years. Another TIB report estimates that Tk 2,000 crore is extorted every year by transport owners' and workers' associations. This money is shared among influential figures, including politicians, police, bureaucrats, contractors, and engineers.

Political leaders have built a patronage system that extends into nearly every sector, including student groups, labour unions, lawyers, teachers, doctors, and business leaders. These groups are often offered financial incentives, business opportunities, or influential positions in exchange for suppressing dissent from the public or opposition parties. This system has enabled successive regimes to cling to power through a mix of violence and rewards, alienating ordinary citizens and causing unnecessary suffering. What is particularly concerning is how politicians exploit the poor and manipulate the youth for their political interests. It has become customary for political parties to use young people as picketers during protests. Some of these picketers are street children, while others are students. Under the guise of political movements, they engage in street violence, often fighting fiercely on behalf of their political mentors and, in the process, become victims of violence themselves. These young people are treated as expendable foot soldiers by all political parties.

There is no doubt that Bangladesh's political standards are now at their lowest point, with integrity in governance and honesty in leadership almost non-existent. Bangladesh's politics had a glorious past, marked by a proud history of struggle and supreme sacrifices for national causes, including the Language Movement of 1952, the Mass Uprising of 1969, and the Liberation War of 1971. In those days, the most well-educated, honest, and socially conscious individuals with high moral values engaged in politics. Unfortunately, over time, things have deteriorated. While even a clerical job now requires a college degree, there is no minimum educational qualification requirement to become an MP—an important position with responsibility for making laws.

Professor Yunus rightly argued that holding elections without meaningful reforms would be a grave mistake. Rebuilding political institutions and fostering a healthier political culture are monumental tasks—especially for an interim government with limited time. Yet, key reforms are essential not only to ensure free and fair elections but also to curb the misuse of state resources and dismantle the cycles of patronage and political violence that have plagued the nation for decades. People are exhausted by these "self-serving netas;" they yearn for leaders capable of rooting out corruption, challenging harmful traditions, and, most importantly, fostering unity for the betterment of Bangladesh. However, these aspirations demand more than empty promises—they require genuine action. Unless politicians address these critical issues, the gap between public expectations and political realities will continue to widen. The question now is whether political leaders will rise to meet the people's expectations—or allow yet another opportunity for meaningful change to slip away.

Abu Afsarul Haider is an entrepreneur.​
 

Ensure diversity in the reform commissions
Lack of female, minority representation is concerning

1729900876883.png

VISUAL: STAR

It is disconcerting that the reform commissions established by the interim government lack adequate representation of women and minority groups. Among the 10 commissions set up so far—concerning the judiciary, election system, civil administration, police, Anti-Corruption Commission, constitution, health affairs, mass media, labour rights, and women's affairs—only the one on women's affairs is headed by a woman.

So far, a total of 50 members have been selected to work for the six commissions constituted on October 3 (while the remaining four are yet to be fully staffed). Of them, only five members are female, according to a report by Prothom Alo. Moreover, there is no representation from religious and ethnic minority groups in the nine-member constitutional reform commission, despite one of the major criticisms of the 1972 constitution being its failure to recognise ethnic minorities. Similarly, the police and judiciary reform commissions have no members from religious and minority communities. Retired government officers make up the largest group—30 percent—among all commission members. In addition, the academics selected as members of various commissions are mostly from Dhaka University (particularly its law department), while other universities, especially those outside Dhaka, have been overlooked.

This underrepresentation of certain groups, and simultaneously overrepresentation of certain others, go against the spirit of the July-August uprising that called for an end to all forms of discrimination. However, diversity carries more than just symbolic value. For example, a recent opinion piece published in this daily highlighted the need for diversity in the health system reform committee. This committee mainly consists of clinicians and physicians, excluding professionals from essential fields such as pharmacology, which is a critical aspect of healthcare.

We still do not know the extent to which the reform commissions will influence the final reform framework, as their mandates or terms of reference have not been published yet. However, Chief Adviser Prof. Muhammad Yunus's September 11 speech indicated that changes proposed by the commissions will not be implemented without consultation with representatives from student bodies, civil society, and major political parties. This offers hope that the final reform framework will incorporate the voices of less-privileged and marginalised communities. Additionally, there is always room to improve the composition of the commissions as the head of each commission has the authority to select the number and qualifications of members.

Thus, we hope that all commissions will prioritise proper representation of diverse groups and perspectives while finalising their members. We also hope that the interim government's future actions will uphold the importance of representational value in all matters of state reform.​
 

Reforms progress reviewed as Yunus sits with body chiefs
Staff Correspondent 04 November, 2024, 16:53


1730793934236.png


Bangladesh’s interim government chief adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus holds a meeting with advisers to different ministries and chiefs of reform commissions at his office in Tejgaon, Dhaka on Monday. | BSS photo

The commissions, formed by the interim government to reform different systems and organisations, are now proceeding at full speed to complete their tasks as soon as possible.

Chiefs of the reform bodies on Monday updated interim government chief adviser Muhammad Yunus about their progress, findings and ideas at a meeting held at the Chief Adviser’s Office at Tejgaon in Dhaka city.

Electoral reform commission chief Badiul Alam Majumdar said at the meeting that measures were underway to ensure the voting rights of Bangladeshi expatriates and work on postal ballots was progressing to enable the voters to exercise franchise through post.

Having mentioned that the voter list was being adjusted with the national identity card database, he said that his commission was taking effective measures to facilitate women’s participation in the electoral process.

Besides maintaining regular communication with the stakeholders, their suggestions were also being collected through using digital platforms, he added.

Public administration reform commission chief Abdul Muyeed Chowdhury informed the chief adviser at the meeting that besides proceeding with the work at full speed, his commission started seeking stakeholders’ opinion through website.

The commission members visited the district and upazila levels and exchanged views with people, Muyeed said.

The commission members informed the chief adviser that they were currently exchanging views with the representatives of various public administration cadres and hoped that they would be able to submit their report within the stipulated timeframe, the chief adviser’s press wing said.

Highlighting the progress of the initiatives of the police administration reform commission, its head Safar Raz Hossain said that the reform commission had already held 14 meetings, including four meetings with stakeholders.

The police reform commission had also posted a questionnaire on the website seeking public opinion, he said, adding that it was scrutinising the proposals made to amend some laws and rules.

The commission was also preparing some proposals to simplify some processes, he added. Safar said that work was also underway on a proposal to change the method and use of force for mob control, while several sections of the Criminal Procedure Code 1898 were being examined to check their need for undergoing change.

Interim government chief adviser at an address to the nation on September 11 announced the six reform commissions tasking them with proposing reforms in six key sectors and organisations.

The commissions have been formed in the backdrop of the interim government’s assuming power on August 8 after Sheikh Hasina had resigned as prime minister and fled to India on August 5 amid a student-led mass uprising, ending the 15-year long autocratic regime led by Awami League.

In his September 11 address, Yunus said that his government wanted effective reforms to start a new journey as a nation.

As the initial step towards reforms, the six commissions were formed, he said.

Later, six prominent citizens were appointed to lead the commissions that officially began their activities from the last month.

The six commissions are—election system reform commission, police administration reform commission, judiciary reform commission, Anti-Corruption Commission reform commission, public administration reform commission and constitutional reform commission.

All the commissions were asked to place their reports by December 31.

The government later formed four more commissions—mass media reform commission, health affairs reform commission, labour rights reform commission, and women affairs reform commission.

On September 19, Yunus held the first meeting with the reform commission chiefs.

With a provision to have a student representative in each commission, so far only the constitutional reform commission out of the first six commissions has named its student member.

The rest five commissions have yet to name their student representatives although over a month has already passed out of 90 days allotted to complete their tasks.

Separate gazettes have, so far, announced the names of 7–9 members of each commission, mentioning the student representative’s name for only the constitutional reform commission.​
 

Future governments must commit sustaining reform process: Finance Adviser
Published :
Nov 05, 2024 23:07
Updated :
Nov 05, 2024 23:07

1730855849053.png

Finance and Commerce Adviser Dr Salehuddin Ahmed has said the interim government has started reforms that the future elected governments must continue.

He said the interim government is making clear the road to reforms, which will be made from a narrow place to a highway. The speed of reforms will increase in the next government.

The adviser said this while speaking as the chief guest at ERF-Nagad best reporting award ceremony, held at hotel in the capital on Tuesday evening, according to UNB.

Dr Salehuddin said the reforms will be sustainable with commitment from the political governments. Otherwise, the benefits of reforms would not reach the common people.

He said the government is doing what works well for the country. Irregularities over years of misrule can't be removed overnight.

He appreciated Bangladesh Banks' Governor Dr. Ahsan H. Mansur for working hard to bring the financial sector on the right track.

With Economic Reporters Forum (ERF) president Refayet Ullah Mirdha in the chair, the function was also addressed, among others, by Bangladesh Bank Governor Dr Ahsan H. Masur, Nagad Board Chairman KAS Murshid, its administrator Muhammad Badiuzzaman Dider and ERF General Secretary Abul kashem.

The Economic Reporters' Forum (ERF) and Nagad, a leading digital financial service have jointly conferred awards on 19 economic reporters in 17 categories economic journalists.

The award winners are Doulot Akter Mala (The Financial Express), Sadrul Hasan (UNB), Fakhrul Islam Harun (Prothom Alo), Jebun Nesa Alo (The Business Standard), Rajib Ahmed (Prothom Alo), Iqbal Ahsan (Channel 24), Md Ismail Ali (Daily Sharebiz), Ahsan Habib Rasel (The Daily Star), Babu Kamruzzaman (News 24), Obaidullah Rony (Samakal), Tauhid Hossain Papon (Jamuna Television), Md Shofiqul Islam (Dhaka Post), Sajjadur Rahman (The Business Standard), Arifur Rahman (Prothom Alo), Salah Uddin Mahmud (The Business Standard), Ziadul Islam (Amader Shomoy), Mohammad Jahangir Shah Kajol (Prothom Alo), Razu Ahmed (Daily Kalbela), and Sushanta K Sinha (Ekattor Television).​
 

Latest Tweets

Dogun18 Ghazi52 Dogun18 wrote on Ghazi52's profile.
Hello Mr. Legend!

Latest Posts

Back