[🇧🇩] - India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh | Page 11 | World Defense Forum

[🇧🇩] India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saif
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 164
  • Views Views 3K
[🇧🇩] India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh
164
3K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense Forum

Trilateral cooperation for Chinese dam on Brahmaputra
Mir Mostafizur Rahaman
Published :
Jan 22, 2025 21:59
Updated :
Jan 22, 2025 21:59

1737616198286.png


The decision of China to construct the world's largest dam on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River, known as the Brahmaputra downstream, has sparked significant concern in India and Bangladesh. The $137 billion project has given rise to fears about possible disruptions to water flow and downstream countries' rightful access to the Brahmaputra's waters. Although China has tried to dispel fear about any negative impact, Bangladesh and India remain apprehensive.

The Brahmaputra is considered a lifeline for Bangladesh, accounting for a significant portion of the country's total water resources. With at least 60 per cent of Bangladesh's population being dependent on its catchment basin, any alteration in the river's flow due to upstream damming poses a serious threat to its water security. Dams allow upstream countries to manipulate water flow, which could lead to reduced availability for downstream nations, jeopardising agriculture, fisheries, and livelihoods.

India has responded to China's plan with its own plan to construct a 10-GW hydroelectric dam in Arunachal Pradesh. This initiative aims to mitigate potential adverse impact of the Chinese dam by creating substantial water storage capacity within Indian territory. However, for Bangladesh, these developments are a double-edged sword. As the smallest downstream nation, it risks being squeezed between the competing interests of its larger neighbours.

To address this challenge, Bangladesh must engage proactively with both China and India to secure commitments ensuring that its due share of Brahmaputra water is not compromised. While bilateral dialogues are essential, experts emphasise the need for trilateral cooperation as the most viable solution. Collaborative approaches can transform potential conflicts into opportunities for mutual benefit.

One possibility is for Bangladesh to negotiate a stake in the Chinese dam project, leveraging the shared benefits of hydropower generation. The dam, projected to produce over 60 GW of electricity, could be an economic boon if power-sharing agreements are established among China, India, and Bangladesh. A tripartite investment model could ensure equitable access to the energy generated, aligning the interests of all three nations.

Trilateral cooperation could also foster trust and reduce regional tensions. By working together, the three countries can address environmental concerns, ensure equitable water distribution, and develop a framework for sustainable management of the Brahmaputra's resources. Such an agreement would demonstrate that shared rivers need not be sources of contention but rather platforms for regional collaboration.

To this end, Bangladesh must initiate efforts at diplomatic level to bring China and India to the negotiating table. It should also engage regional and international organizations to mediate and support the dialogue. A transparent, inclusive process will be the key to ensuring that the Brahmaputra remains a source of life and livelihood for all three nations.

Ultimately, the construction of dams on the Brahmaputra should not become a zero-sum game. With sincere and sustained trilateral dialogue, this critical transboundary river can emerge as a symbol of cooperation and a driver of regional stability.​
 

Can ‘engineering diplomacy’ solve Bangladesh-India water issue?

1738536878494.png

Addressing natural calamities requires more than just technical fixes—it demands an understanding of the social and political narratives that shape perceptions and responses. FILE PHOTO: STAR

Bangladesh is still recovering from the devastating August 2024 floods, one of the worst regional floods in its history. Millions were displaced, livelihoods shattered, and diplomatic tensions reignited. Yet, this crisis could be the turning point for regional cooperation.

The science and misinformation of the floods

The floods were driven by intensified monsoon rains, a shifting jet stream, and the Madden-Julian Oscillation funnelling moisture into south-eastern Bangladesh. Districts like Feni and Noakhali, areas not typically prone to severe flooding, experienced record-breaking rainfall and devastating impacts—half a million displaced, over 300,000 hectares of farmland submerged, and schools and roads left in ruins.

But alongside the rising waters came a surge of misinformation. Social media was rife with accusations that India had released water from upstream dams to worsen the floods in Bangladesh—a narrative fuelled by decades of mistrust over water sharing. While these claims were scientifically questionable, they complicated mitigation efforts and strained relationship between the two neighbours.

Addressing natural calamities requires more than just technical fixes—it demands an understanding of the social and political narratives that shape perceptions and responses. This is where engineering diplomacy can play a transformative role.

Engineering diplomacy: A bridge between science and society

Engineering diplomacy offers a pathway forward. It synthesises scientific facts ("numbers") with cultural and political contexts ("narratives") to create solutions that are technically defensible, societally acceptable, ethically responsible, and politically feasible. Rather than framing the floods merely as a natural disaster or a political weapon, engineering diplomacy would encourage both nations to explore shared interests. Bangladesh's vulnerability to extreme weather and India's role as an upstream actor are not mutually exclusive—they are intertwined challenges that demand shared solutions. By moving from positions ("India must release more water") to interests ("how do we ensure equitable water availability?"), engineering diplomacy fosters trust and pragmatic problem-solving.

What Bangladesh and India can do together

The 2024 floods underscore the shared stakes for both nations. India, too, faced devastating floods in upstream regions like Tripura and Bihar highlighting how interconnected the challenges are. Recognising this shared vulnerability, Bangladesh and India can take specific steps towards resilience and cooperation:

Initiate a "devising seminar" for shared resilience

The two countries can convene multi-stakeholder workshops with representation from four critical communities from Bangladesh and India—knowledge, political, resource, and affected—which can create a platform for collaborative problem-solving. This informal yet structured dialogue can focus on key areas like real-time data sharing, joint flood forecasting systems, and equitable water-sharing protocols for transboundary rivers such as the Feni and Gomti. I have discussed details of a devising seminar in an earlier piece for the Himalayan rivers. We need informed conversations to hammer out the details required to act and move forward on how to develop and share transboundary resources for an equitable and sustainable future. Complexity of transboundary issues demands learning from other river basins like the Nile, Jordan, and Danube—and adapting to local situations.

Strengthen public perceptions against misinformation

Debunking misinformation and conspiracy theories during a disaster usually does not work. Countering misinformation isn't just about presenting facts—it's about addressing the fears and mistrust that fuel these narratives. Within the context of current Bangladesh-India relations, these narratives are not surprising.

Collaborative projects that are responsive to the underlying interests—not positions–of both parties may be an effective way to ease these tensions, lessen misinformation virality during future floods, and make practical progress on flood resiliency challenges. For example, statements that simultaneously acknowledge that Bangladesh has legitimate fears of water control by India while being clear that the evidence in this particular case does not suggest India's political interference could go far to debunk conspiracy-inspired narratives. As a proactive measure, both nations can launch joint public communication campaigns now to start developing trust in the information they share. By aligning messaging with scientific findings and cultural sensitivities, these campaigns can build trust and reduce the likelihood of misinformation inflaming tensions when the next flood hits the region.

Reactivate collaborative institutions

The Joint River Commission between India and Bangladesh offers a formal venue for cooperation but has been largely inactive. Reactivating its subcommittees, particularly the Indo-Bangladesh Experts on Flood Forecasting and Warning Systems, could reinvigorate bilateral efforts. This subcommittee has not met since 2004.

Demonstrate collaboration through pilot projects

Pilot initiatives such as joint construction of flood-resilient embankments or shared water-storage facilities for the Feni and Gomti rivers can demonstrate the benefits of collaboration. In addition, establishing a shared platform for real-time data exchange on rainfall and river flows to improve flood forecasting accuracy and initiating joint training programmes for disaster response teams to equip them with advanced tools and techniques for flood mitigation can serve as examples of tangible steps forward. These projects will turn shared challenges into opportunities for cooperation.

Expand collaboration beyond water

Collaboration doesn't have to stop at rivers. To develop actionable strategies, a different approach that goes beyond water and includes a package of mutually beneficial options is needed. For example, joint solar parks and renewable energy projects can reduce energy insecurity on both sides. The inclusion of Sundarbans—as perhaps the only transboundary ecosystem that has a World Heritage site and Ramsar site on both sides of the boundary—within the upcoming 2026 Ganges Water Treaty negotiations can serve as an example of how to operationalise engineering diplomacy processes and tools for effective transboundary water cooperation. We need to look for opportunities to engage affected groups in value-creating exercises before final decisions are made. This will encourage issue and option linkages and increase opportunities for meaningful negotiations. Seeking broader consensus (total unanimity is not essential) and relying on professional neutral facilitators is likely to help formulate nearly self-enforcing and easier to get compliance agreements.

Shafiqul Islam is director of Water Diplomacy, professor of civil and environmental engineering and water diplomacy at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, US.​
 
Water flow of each and every river is decreasing because of global warming and other environmental factors. It need a great effort to restore water flow. You do everything and make sure that muftkhor countries get sufficient water to waste.They will not do anything to conserve water, help in forestation, cleaning of river, remove water logging. Muftkhor just want water.
 
Water flow of each and every river is decreasing because of global warming and other environmental factors. It need a great effort to restore water flow. You do everything and make sure that muftkhor countries get sufficient water to waste.They will not do anything to conserve water, help in forestation, cleaning of river, remove water logging. Muftkhor just want water.
I don't know the meaning of muftkhor but India surely is a pani-chor country.
 
I don't know the meaning of muftkhor but India surely is a pani-chor country.

Whatever water we provide is out of Goodwill only. It is BD which needs water without sharing any burden of maintaining water flow like plantation in basing, efforts to remove water logging amidst the decreasing water flow due to Global Warming. India should not Hesitate atall to use water as per its will without bothering atall about the BD concern. Whatever India gives is an obligation. We provided it one sided under Gujaral Doctrine without getting anything in return. With the recent development in BD and their collective behavior of Hindus and Hinduism, BD has lost this goodwill. You have a big sea in your south. Put a desalination plant and get as much water as you wish.
 
Whatever water we provide is out of Goodwill only. It is BD which needs water without sharing any burden of maintaining water flow like plantation in basing, efforts to remove water logging amidst the decreasing water flow due to Global Warming. India should not Hesitate atall to use water as per its will without bothering atall about the BD concern. Whatever India gives is an obligation. We provided it one sided under Gujaral Doctrine without getting anything in return. With the recent development in BD and their collective behavior of Hindus and Hinduism, BD has lost this goodwill. You have a big sea in your south. Put a desalination plant and get as much water as you wish.
When a river travels through more than one country it is called international river. India unliterally withdraws water from international rivers and that's where Bangladesh objects. What goes around comes around. Look what China is doing to India with Brahmaputra river.
 
When a river travels through more than one country it is called international river. India unliterally withdraws water from international rivers and that's where Bangladesh objects. What goes around comes around. Look what China is doing to India with Brahmaputra river.

Go to international court and get the judgement of your favor. India and BD has resolved international sea water issue through this process only.
 
When a river travels through more than one country it is called international river. India unliterally withdraws water from international rivers and that's where Bangladesh objects. What goes around comes around. Look what China is doing to India with Brahmaputra river.

By the way China is building a huge dam in Tibet by which it can flood Brahmaputra any time. India plans a 2+ time bigger dan to counter that. Will BD fund this project as the BD will be biggest beneficiary of this measure by the way to Brahmaputra flood control?
 
By the way China is building a huge dam in Tibet by which it can flood Brahmaputra any time. India plans a 2+ time bigger dan to counter that. Will BD fund this project as the BD will be biggest beneficiary of this measure by the way to Brahmaputra flood control?
Bangladesh will be the worst victim of Indian dam because India will play the same dirty water game with Bangladesh as it is playing through Farakka.
 
Bangladesh will be the worst victim of Indian dam because India will play the same dirty water game with Bangladesh as it is playing through Farakka.

You can convince China not to build the dam on upstream. Our dam is in reaction to save flooding of down stream area. You have a strategic partnerships with China. If China doesn't build a dam upstream, India will not build it down stream.
 

Latest Tweets

Dogun18 Ghazi52 Dogun18 wrote on Ghazi52's profile.
Hello Mr. Legend!

Latest Posts

Back