☕ Support Us
[🇧🇩] - Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment | Page 32 | PKDefense

[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment
493
12K
More threads by Saif


Rethinking anti-polythene drive
SYED FATTAHUL ALIM
Published :
Jan 27, 2025 21:18
Updated :
Jan 27, 2025 21:21

1738024045873.png


A director of the Department of Environment (DoE) was reportedly seriously injured in an attack allegedly by the workers from an illegal polythene factory in the Chowkbazar area of Old Dhaka on Sunday (January 26). The said DoE official along with others was returning after carrying out a raid, reportedly, led by a deputy secretary of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) on the polythene factory in question. The first question that comes to mind is what the police force accompanying the MoEFCC's enforcement team was doing when the violence took place so that the attackers could get away with looting, as reported, a truck laden with confiscated materials from the polythene factory that was sealed by law enforcers? Obviously, the attack was reprehensible and against the law since the DoE officials were carrying out a government order as part of the nationwide campaign against production, marketing and use of polythene that started on November 3 last year. Notably, the ban on the use, production, marketing and transportation of polythene bags was first imposed in 2002 in exercise of the Environmental Conservation Act, 1995. And there are provisions of stringent penal measures including prison term and fine for production and marketing of polythene. Sadly, the ban soon lost its efficacy and within just four years, the use of polythene again started in 2006. It hardly needs explaining that just enunciation of a law is not enough for its implementation however harsh it may be in its wording. Two issues have dogged the law against polythene from the outset. And those have to do with the economy of polythene and the lack of alternative products to replace polythene such as in the form of bags and various packaging materials. The economy of polythene is huge as according to the Bangladesh Plastic Goods Manufacturers Association, there are 6,000 industrial units in this sector that employ some 500,000 workers. For encouraging the use of jute bags and other jute products as an alternative to polythene, a law was enacted in 2010. But the production of bags and other packaging materials with jute was neither adequate to meet the demand, nor was it cost-effective.

The cabinet division, for instance, on September 5 last year, instructed all government offices to stop the use of single-use plastics and introduce environment-friendly alternatives instead. Later, from October 1 last year, the government banned the use of polythene and polypropylene shopping bags in all superstores. The government order did indeed stimulate production of eco-friendly bags from jute and other biodegradable materials by some small-scale business units. But they could not produce enough bags to meet the demand of the superstores. Worse yet, those business units are facing shortage of fabrics to make bags and at the same time, the prices of jute and cotton fabrics have shot up suddenly. As a result, the production costs of these biodegradable cotton bags increased rendering them less cost-effective. In that case, what alternatives are there before the major consumers of bags and packaging materials to replace plastics such as polythene? The manufacturers of the banned polythene bags, on their part, also use a similar logic to justify themselves saying that since there is demand for single-use poly bags, they are meeting the market demand knowing full well that they are violating law.

So, one should not be surprised by the fact that a large number of unlicensed small-scale factories are producing polythene and other plastic items in the Chowkbazar, Debidas lane of Old Dhaka, Churihatta, Lalbagh and Kamrangir Char areas of the city. Even the DoE knows it, said a report.

Do not these facts militate against the success of the anti-polythene drive that began more than two decades ago?

In that case, should one be surprised by Sunday's attack on an enforcement team of DoE?​
 

Sundarbans, the protector, threatened by poison
Today, the Sundarbans itself is in danger due to these combined threats. Read the Prothom Alo investigation report
Emtiaz Uddin
Koyra, Khulna
Published: 28 Jan 2025, 19: 41

1738110363283.png

Unscrupulous fishermen are setting up small net traps across the creeks from one end to the other in the Sundarbans. As the tide recedes during low tide, they pour pesticides into the creeks, killing the fish. This is happening in a wildlife sanctuary in the western part of the Sundarbans. Prothom Alo

The Sundarbans is facing severe cyclones one after another caused by climate change. However, it is not just storms and tidal surges causing harm. Rising salinity and temperature, along with new diseases and pests, are damaging the country’s greatest protector. Adding to this is the exploitation by unscrupulous individuals. Today, the Sundarbans itself is in danger due to these combined threats.

According to an investigation by Prothom Alo, the greatest danger in the Sundarbans at the moment is the competition among fishermen to catch fish using poison. At least three powerful quarters are behind this illegal activity. One group includes fish traders, known as "company mahajans," who control certain fishermen and encourage them to use poison to quickly catch large quantities of fish. Another group is comprised of corrupt forest guards who take bribes from these traders, allowing them to poison the rivers and canals in wildlife sanctuaries. Recently, forest pirates have also joined in, working with these groups. Some journalists are reportedly assisting them.

The officer-in-charge of the Hadda patrol station in the Sundarbans, Sabit Mahmud, said, "When he meets fishermen in the forest, many of them refer to their "mahajan", a journalist. I recently heard about a journalist from the Koyra upazila, who became a millionaire by being involved in the illegal business of catching fish fry in the Sundarbans."

A forest officer said that many people identifying themselves as journalists take allowances from forest stations every month. This practice has been going on for years.

In 2018, many forest pirates who had surrendered became inactive, but with the support of dishonest fish traders, they have now returned to the Sundarbans. These pirates offer protection to the fishermen working for the company mahajans, while robbing others. This has led to a significant increase in poisoning and fishing activities in the Sundarbans.

Govinda Mandal, a fisherman from the northern Bedkashi area of Koyra, has been fishing in the Sundarbans' rivers and canals for the past 55 years. He told Prothom Alo, "There was no tradition to use poison for fishing in the past. There were plenty of fish at that time. But for the past five to six years, poison has been entering the forest, and now, there are fewer fish, and even the birds are not available."

1738110416694.png

A bottle of pesticide is lying on the banks of the canal. Recently, this was seen in the Petkatar canal area near the Koyra River in the Sundarbans. Prothom Alo

Sundarbans turns blue in poison

In favour of a private organisation, Md Shah Paran works on a project related to the “Assessment of the Aquatic Resources of the Sundarbans”

He told Prothom Alo, “For eight months, I’ve been visiting the fish markets near the Sundarbans in Koyra every day, counting the fish species. However, most of the fish brought to the market are caught using poison. The smell of poison is especially strong in shrimp. Locals don’t eat the fish from the Sundarbans. The poisonous fish are all transported by truck to Dhaka and other districts of the country.”

The Forest Conservator of the Khulna region, Mihir Kumar Doe said, “At various times, we have seized bottles of poison or poisoned fish from dishonest fishermen in the Sundarbans. We’ve found that most of the poison is used to kill pests on vegetables and plants. Fishermen use two types of poison: one for white fish and another for shrimp. Some poisons, when mixed with water, create an oxygen deficiency, causing the fish to weaken and die. If birds eat the dead fish or crabs, they can also die. Consuming such fish would certainly harm the human body.”

1738110468465.png

Shrimp caught with poison are turned into dried fish at this factory. They are then sent to Dhaka and other parts of the country. Recently, this was seen in the village of Deyara, near the Sundarbans in Koyra, Khulna. Prothom Alo

Following the Forest Conservator’s remarks, several pesticide-selling shops in the Koyra area near the Sundarbans were visited. A variety of pesticides were being sold in large quantities. Some people, who don’t even own a piece of land for cultivation, were seen buying pesticides. One seller revealed that fishermen from the Sundarbans often buy pesticides like Diamgro, Fighter, Ripcord, and Pesicol, claiming they use them on plants or vegetables. Discussions with local sources revealed that poisons containing chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin kill both white fish and shrimp. On the other hand, poison containing only cypermethrin kills only shrimp.

Prothom Alo spoke with several individuals who had served jail term for fishing with poison. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, one fisherman at the South Bedkashi area of Koyra, said, “I started using poison to catch a lot of fish in a short period a few years ago. When the tidal waters fill the canals in the forest, we set traps at both ends with small nets. Then, when the tide recedes, we pour pesticides like Nitro and Ripcord into the traps. The fish surface within a few minutes.”

The fishermen also mentioned that, at times, it becomes difficult to bring poisoned shrimp to the local markets. In such cases, they dry the shrimp in the forest itself. They cut trees deep inside the forest to make temporary platforms, where they set fire to pieces of wood underneath and dry the shrimp. The dried shrimp are then tactfully sent to Mongla.

Gaurang Nandi, Chairman of the Center for Environment and Participatory Research (CEPR), said that the use of poison in the rivers and canals of the Sundarbans is causing significant damage not only to aquatic life but also to the mangrove forest.

He said, “The types of poison fishermen spray in the Sundarbans are mainly used for pest control on fruits and crops. This toxic water is absorbed by the trees through their roots, leading to harmful effects on them. Consuming these poisoned fish is also causing long-term health issues in humans, including cancer.” He stressed the need for specific research on the matter.

Collusion between companies and forest officials

Md Jahangir Sardar, a resident of Koyra village near the Sundarbans, is one of the fishermen who secretly enter the sanctuary by bribing forest officials under the guise of having legal permission. He told Prothom Alo, “I’ve been fishing in the forest since childhood. But the bribe required by the Forest Department keeps increasing. A few years ago, they used to take Tk 1,000 for every seven days, but now it’s Tk 5,000 per boat. Through middlemen, we pay bribes to forest rangers to enter the protected areas and catch fish to cover the cost.”

The Sundarbans, covering an area of 6,017 square kilometers in Bangladesh, has nearly 3,200 square kilometers designated as a sanctuary.

Forest Conservator at the Khulna region, Mihir Kumar Doe said that more than half of the Sundarbans' sanctuary areas are completely off-limits to fishermen.

However, local fishermen, honey collectors, and community leaders revealed that illegal fishing with poison occurs throughout the year across the forest, especially in the sanctuary areas where more fish are found. The fishing spots are controlled by the company middlemen.

There are allegations that if any fisherman attempts to fish in the sanctuary areas without being part of this syndicate, forest department officials will have them arrested. To fish with poison without interference, a fisherman must be listed with a company middleman. This has become an unwritten rule in the areas surrounding the Sundarbans.

Local fishermen from Koyra, Paikgachha, and Dakop upazilas said that about 25 to 30 businessmen secretly collaborate with forest officials to catch fish and crabs year-round. Some of the well-known company middlemen include Zulfiqar Ali, Lutfor Rahman, Rezaul Karim, Saheb Ali, Amirul Islam, Nur Hossain, Habibullah, Abu Musa, Majed, Kamrul, Mintu, Halim, Rajab Ali, Bashar, Masum, Mofizul, Mozafar, Abdul Khalek, Zahir Member, Ashraful Islam, Shahazul, and Riyasad Ali.

Abu Musa, a company middleman, acknowledged his involvement in sending fishermen to the sanctuary to carry on the illegal trade. However, he suggested that to stop the use of poison in the forest, the sanctuary areas should be divided among the middlemen. He explained that one middleman’s area should not allow others to enter. Forest officials transfer responsibility from one person to another as soon as they receive a larger bribe. After catching fish for one cycle, since there is uncertainty about being able to fish again, the middlemen give the fishermen poison to use.

When asked about which companies’ middlemen fish in the restricted areas of the Sundarbans, Abu Musa said, “The largest middlemen in the Sundarbans are Zahir Member and Babul from the Dakop area. They control 200 to 250 boats in the sanctuary. Zahir pays Tk 13,000 per boat to the forest officials to catch fish and crabs in the restricted areas like Neelkamal, Patkosta, and Bhomorkhali. My boats, which number 8-10, operate in Bhomorkhali, and we pay Tk 10,000 per boat to the forest officials. Other middlemen like Kamrul, Mozaffar, Jamal Mondol, Tutul, and Mustafiz are also involved.”

Abu Musa added, “The wealthiest businessman in Koyra is Riyasad Ali, who has the best connections with the forest officials. Without him, it’s impossible to enter the restricted areas with boats.”

When the names of these businessmen were mentioned, a responsible forest official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Prothom Alo, “We know all these businessmen. However, it is difficult to catch them red-handed inside the Sundarbans. We also face staff shortages and many limitations.”

Smell of poison in the fish market

June, July, and August are the breeding seasons for wildlife and fish in the Sundarbans. During this period, the forest department imposes restrictions on fishing in the rivers and canals of the forest, as well as on tourists entering the forest. However, this year, during the closed season, illegal activities such as poisoning fish and hunting deer in the Sundarbans have significantly increased compared to other times, according to residents living near the Sundarbans.

An investigation into this began on 12 July last year. At that time, entry for fishermen in the Sundarbans was strictly prohibited. But on that very day, it was heard in the village of Gariyabari in Koyra that a local man named Bhobachandra Das had been taken away by a tiger in the forest. On 20 July, Bhobachandra’s nephew, Tapas Das, reported that 11 other people were hunting crabs deep in the forest area of Bhomorkhali with his uncle.

The Bhomorkhali area falls under the jurisdiction of the forest department's Nalian Forest Station. When the forest officer, Tanzilur Rahman, was contacted about the issue, he promised to conduct a swift raid in the area. However, shortly after, an unknown person called and warned, “You asked the forest officer to raid Bhomorkhali. This is not a good development.” It became clear that illegal activities were happening with the cooperation of the forest officers.

The businessmen mentioned, we know all of them. But it is difficult to catch them red-handed inside the Sundarbans. Besides, we face a shortage of manpower and many other limitations.

A responsible forest officer on condition of anonymity

Regarding entry into the forest during the closed season, fisherman Akbarul Islam from Koyra said, “If the forest department doesn't want it, the fishermen wouldn't even be able to touch the water of a canal in the Sundarbans. I had to bribe a forest officer just to collect honey."

In the morning on 13 July, a visit to the fish market in Doulia Bazar of Koyra confirmed Akbarul’s statement. The market had not opened yet, but fish from nearby enclosures had already arrived, along with crabs from the Sundarbans. Within half an hour, the market became filled with fish and people. Shrimp, betki, jaba, sillet, payra, datina, and many other types of fish were arriving. Several fish traders, sitting in a tea shop, mentioned that most of the fish were caught illegally in the Sundarbans using poison and illegal nets.

At the market, several trucks were seen standing. The drivers said that they would be taking the fish from the market to Dhaka. At the crab market, there was also hustle and bustle. Bags filled with crabs from the Sundarbans were being measured and tied. This was happening during the period when entry into the forest was prohibited.

Fisherman Mobarak Hossain from Maheshwaripur said, “Even though the government announced the season closed for three months, illegal fishing with poison has continued through secret agreement with forest officers. For catching fish with small nets, they charged Tk 800; for deer hunting Tk 5,000; for catching fish with poison in a 'vesali' net Tk 3,000; and for hunting crabs, forest guards have been taking Tk 3,000 per day for four consecutive days.”

At 9:30am, a shrimp-laden van left the Doulia Bazaar fish market. The reporter, carefully following the van, saw it stop at the side of the road near the village of Deyara in Maharajpur union, Koyra. Several people took the shrimp from the van to a two-room house some distance from the main road. Inside the house, a few hundred kilograms of shrimp were spread on bamboo platforms, emitting a strong smell of poison. Nearby, piles of red dried fish were stacked, and smoke was rising from pieces of wood below the platforms.

When asked who owned the factory, an elderly woman introduced herself as Sofia Begum, a worker there. She said this land belongs to Mukul Gazi from Maharajpur area. He is given Tk 3,000 as rent monthly. She also revealed that the factory was run by Jalal Sheikh from Maheshwaripur, and Noor Box Gazi in Maharajpur supplies the shrimp caught with poison. The factory had been operating for three years, and 245 kg of shrimp had been brought that day. Sofia mentioned that each kg of dried fish was sold for Tk 1,400, and traders took it to various places, including Dhaka.

In a nearby house, dried shrimp were laid out on bamboo racks, and a strong, pungent odor was in the air. The room had an odd smell from the poison used on the shrimp, and freshly made dried fish was stacked nearby.

Unraveling the mystery of the arrest

When questioned about the inaction of the forest department and their alleged collusion with criminals, a forest officer at the Kashiabad Forest Station in Koyra, Nirmal Mondal, said: “The local panel chairman Lutfor, businessman Amirul, Jamal, and others have come to me at least three times asking me to allow their fishing boats into the forest during the closed season. They also made underhand proposals, but I refused. The allegations against me are not true.”

According to forest-dependent fishermen, forest officers do not take money directly from them. Instead, they receive payments through middlemen, called “company traders.” When fishermen are caught or fined, these traders pay the fines on their behalf, and later, the money is deducted from the fishermen’s earnings.

Recently, six fishermen from Koyra were arrested for fishing with two boats in the Bhomorkhali area. One of the detained fishermen's uncle, Jahid Hossain, told Prothom Alo that earlier, there was an outstanding payment of Tk 10,000 for these two boats from a previous agreement with the forest department. Since they didn't pay, the fishermen were tactfully arrested, and cases were filed against them.

Another detained fisherman Mithun Sarder's relative Mustafa Hossain said that the arrested fishermen had told them that their two boats contained about 200 kg of white fish and 60-70 kg of shrimp. The forest guards took all the fish, and after holding the fishermen for two days, they couldn't pay the fine, so the authorities planted poison bottles on them and sent them to court.

A fish trader from Palli Mangal village in Koyra, Mostafizur Rahman, mentioned, “We lease canals in the Sundarbans from the forest guards, but problems arise when big businessmen pay higher amounts to push out smaller traders. In such incidents, cases are filed against us.”

When asked, Abdul Hakim, the officer-in-charge of the Bhomorkhali Patrol Camp, said, “We don’t allow fishing with poison, so the fishermen falsely accuse the forest guards. We only follow orders from senior officers.”

Since the government change on 5 August, many things have shifted in the Sundarbans. The Assistant Forest Conservator of the Khulna Range, AZM Hasanur Rahman, was appointed as the Divisional Officer of the Sundarbans West Forest Division.

When asked, he said, "Forest guards have no connection with crimes related to forest resources and claimed that fabricated complaints were made by people who could not get illegal advantages."

Return of the forest bandits

Since 5 August, one of the most alarming changes in the Sundarbans has been the resurgence of forest bandits. According to forest dwellers, some unscrupulous fish and crab traders are fueling the activities of the bandits.

These traders are controlling canals in the protected areas of the Sundarbans and are sending the bandits into the forest to catch fish using poison. While the bandits hold ordinary fishermen hostage, they do not harass those fishermen who work under the influential traders.

Fishermen say that many groups that had surrendered in 2018 have returned to banditry in the Sundarbans. In particular, the activities of the Majnu group, Sharif group, Dayal group, Rabiul group, Abdullah group, Manjur group, and Masum Billah group have increased in the western Sundarbans. These bandit groups have reportedly connection with the poison-fishing syndicates.

Forest dwellers claim that some unscrupulous fish and crab traders are behind the bandits. They are controlling the canals in the restricted areas of the Sundarbans and using the bandits to fish with poison. While the bandits hold ordinary fishermen hostage, they do not bother the fishermen working under the traders.

Several fishermen from the Goryabari of Koyra, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Prothom Alo that fish and crab traders from the Dacope and Koyra regions are sending fishermen into the restricted areas to catch fish and crabs. There is a rivalry between the traders from these two areas over control of the territory. The bandit group close to the traders in Dacope is the Mama-Bhagne group, while the group in Koyra is the Rabiul group.

In the past month, several fishermen from Koyra have paid ransom to be freed from the bandits' captivity. Among them, fishermen like Saleman Molla, Nazrul Gazi, Sushanto Rapton, and Imamuddin shared that they had to pay at least Tk 20,000 to secure their release. Each bandit group consists of 10-12 members, all of whom are armed. They hunt deer to meet their food demands daily.

On 6 January, Rajab Ali, a fisherman from village No. 6 in Koyra, returned to his area after being freed from the bandits. He shared that he was held hostage for two days before being released by the bandits, who left his younger brother, Riazul Islam, behind.

Rajab Ali further mentioned, "The bandits are overseeing the fishermen controlled by the traders who spread poison to catch fish. Whenever they find a network inside the forest, they contact the traders by phone."

Imdadul Haque, the OC of Koyra police station, stated, “Since the political change, I’ve heard that notorious criminals who escaped from the Satkhira jail, as well as bandits who had surrendered six years ago, have returned to banditry. We are looking into the old forest bandits. If anyone tries to instill fear in the Sundarbans, they will be dealt with firmly."

*This report, originally published in Prothom Alo print and online editions, has been rewritten in English by Rabiul Islam.​
 

US walks away from Paris deal
Mohammed Norul Alam Raju 31 January, 2025, 00:00

ON HIS first day back in office, US president Donald Trump reignited a controversial chapter of American climate policy by notifying the United Nations of his administration’s intention to exit the Paris Climate agreement — for a second time. This echoes his first term, when the US formally withdrew from the accord in 2020, only for Joe Biden to reverse the decision in 2021. Trump, however, remains steadfast in his belief that the agreement is ‘unfair and one-sided,’ making climate policy a key battleground in his political narrative.

The Trump administration argued that the accord that united nearly 200 nations imposed disproportionate burdens on the US, citing potential economic disadvantages, job losses, and costs to the coal and fossil fuel industries. It also claimed the agreement allowed countries such as China and India to continue polluting while allegedly undermining US competitiveness. This withdrawal, which will take one year to execute, will leave the US among a small group of non-signatories, including Iran, Libya, and Yemen.

The Paris climate agreement, adopted in 2015, aimed to combat climate change by limiting global warming to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Nations committed to voluntary targets for reducing emissions, known as nationally determined contributions, and pledged to enhance these targets every five years. For the US, this meant ambitious goals: cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 61–66 per cent by 2035, a pathway to net-zero emissions by 2050.

Trump’s executive order claimed that this Accord, along with other international agreements, fails to align with US values and ‘redirects’ American taxpayer dollars ‘to nations that neither need nor deserve such financial assistance’. Instead of adhering to a collective global framework, Trump argued that the US’s track record of balancing economic growth with environmental goals should serve as a model for other countries.

Declaring an ‘energy emergency,’ he revived his infamous mantra, ‘drill, baby, drill,’ and pledged to roll back what he labelled as Biden’s electric vehicle mandate. He contended that the US should not undermine its industries while nations like China continue to pollute without consequence. ‘China uses a lot of dirty energy but produces a lot of energy,’ he claimed, adding, ‘When that stuff goes up in the air, it doesn’t stay there... It floats into the United States of America after three-and-a-half to five-and-a-half days.’

The political dimension of Trump’s decision cannot be ignored. The 2024 US presidential election witnessed over $4 billion in contributions to candidates’ campaign committees and external groups supporting them. According to Yale Climate Connections, the fossil fuel industry spent $219 million to influence the outcome of the election. Much of the money in politics is directed to political action committees and political party committees rather than specific candidates. Notably, 88 per cent of contributions from the fossil fuel industry went to Republicans. These figures represent only reported contributions, with actual sums potentially much higher. In recent years, the US became the world’s largest gas producer, and 2023 witnessed a record issuance of 758 oil and gas drilling licences.

A critical question is how the US withdrawal will affect the global climate accord.

The US has significantly increased its funding for climate initiatives in recent years. This funding originates from various sources, including the US government, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the department of agriculture. In 2023, the US provided $9.5 billion in international climate finance, marking a six-fold increase from 2021. The US also implemented numerous climate programs, including climate pollution reduction grants, community change grant program and emergency plan for adaptation and resilience. Most of this funding was allocated to adaptation, clean energy, and sustainable landscapes. The US withdrawal from the Paris agreement is expected to impact the implementation of these programs on the ground.

Donald Trump’s initial decision to withdraw the US from the Paris agreement during his first term served as a wake-up call for the European Union and significantly influenced its climate ambitions. The US withdrawal created a leadership void in global climate policy, as the US was one of the largest emitters and a key player in international negotiations. The EU seized this opportunity to assume a more prominent role in driving global climate efforts. China transitioned from co-leadership with the US to sole leadership, while India maintained its commitments. However, Brazil’s climate ambitions were curtailed following the election of Jair Bolsonaro, a climate sceptic.

It is premature to predict how the current withdrawal will shape global climate efforts. A major concern is the extent to which the fossil fuel industry will influence policy decisions, potentially exacerbating climate challenges.

Some may question the implications of US withdrawal for climate finance. With the US stepping back, other nations may face increased pressure to enhance their commitments to meet global targets. Specifically, questions arise regarding who will bear the costs of addressing climate damages and facilitating the energy transition. COP29, dubbed the ‘Finance COP,’ aimed to secure $300 billion annually from developed nations to assist developing countries in addressing climate change. However, this sum constitutes less than 25 per cent of what was initially sought. Will other donor nations compensate for the shortfall created by the US withdrawal, or will it undermine global resolve to supply climate finance to developing countries?

The US is responsible for about 22 per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions since 1950. Although China surpassed the US as the world’s largest annual carbon emitter several years ago, the US remains the second-largest annual emitter, releasing 4.9 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in 2023. Trump’s return raises fears that these emissions could rise, reversing progress toward global targets.

The reality of climate change is undeniable. The catastrophic wildfires in Los Angeles serve as a reminder that Americans, like the rest of the world, are increasingly affected by worsening climate change. Laurence Tubiana, a key architect of the Paris accord, expressed disappointment over the US withdrawal but emphasised that global action to combat climate change ‘is stronger than any single country’s politics and policies.’

Despite Trump’s scepticism, the clean energy market is expanding rapidly, projected to surpass $2 trillion by 2035. His dismissal of Biden’s clean energy policies as a ‘green new scam’ contrasts sharply with international resolve to combat climate change. Notably, even during Trump’s first withdrawal, no other nation followed suit. Instead, countries, businesses, and local governments reaffirmed their commitments, showing that the fight against climate change transcends individual leaders.

Public opinion, too, reflects a growing consensus. An Associated Press-NORC poll found that only 2 in 10 US adults supported withdrawal from the Paris agreement, while approximately one-quarter were neutral. Notably, even less than half of Republicans backed the move. These statistics suggest that while Trump’s policies may appeal to a vocal minority, the broader public recognises the need for climate action.

Mohammed Norul Alam Raju is a researcher and development activist.​
 

Air pollution intensifies
Rashad Ahamad 31 January, 2025, 23:40

1738365462320.png


Lack of monitoring, effective steps blamed

Air pollution in Dhaka city is getting more intense and is staying for periods much longer than it did nine years ago amid a serious lack of pragmatic measure to control the sources of air pollution, increasingly posing public health threats.

According to the available air quality monitoring data, the city’s air has steadily worsened since 2016 both in terms of quality and duration of stay except the Covid-19 period when the government imposed restrictions on public mobility.

Air quality monitoring data shows that in leap year 2024, Dhaka city residents experienced unhealthy air for a staggering 216 days out of 366 days compared with 92 days in 2016.

The Centre for Atmospheric Pollution Studies analysed the air pollution data in the past nine years to find that the average score in the air quality index in Dhaka was 171 in 2024 that was 150 in 2016.

Air quality index scores between 151 and 200 mean ‘unhealthy’ air in which bigger scores indicate worse quality.

The AQI value for particle pollution—a term indicating a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets in the air—between 101 and 150 indicates the air is ‘unhealthy for sensitive groups’,

between 151 and 200 indicates it is ‘unhealthy’, between 201 and 300 indicates ‘very unhealthy’ air, while 301+ is considered ‘hazardous’ that poses serious health risks to residents.

According to a latest World Bank report titled ‘Breathing heavy: New Evidence on Air Pollution and Health in Bangladesh’, air pollution was the second largest risk factor leading to deaths and disability in Bangladesh. Around 78,000–88000 people died in 2019 in Bangladesh due to health hazards caused by air pollution.

Bangladesh’s economic losses from air pollution are estimated between 3.9 and 4.4 per cent of the country’s gross domestic product in 2019.

According to the report, 28 per cent polluted air generated from biomass burning, 24 per cent from power plants, 12 per cent from brick kilns, 11 per cent from open burning of waste materials, 8 per cent from dust and 13 per cent from other sources.

Centre for Atmospheric Pollution Studies director Professor Kamruzzaman Mazumder said that pollution soared because new sources of pollution added with the existing ones in the absence of a strict monitoring mechanism.

Environment, forest and climate change adviser Syeda Rizwana Hasan termed air pollution control as a time consuming issue.

She said that the government, having set the air pollution control among its top priority issues, had been seriously at work.

She also put impetus on improving the fuel quality and increasing the refinery capacity for improving the air quality.

‘Bangladesh must adopt a long-term strategy to combat pollution effectively,’ Rizwana said.

A director of the Department of Environment Ziaul Haque said that they were conducting mobile courts against the polluters and already shut down several hundred brick kilns and fined industries and vehicles for polluting air.

‘Everyone is affected by air pollution to some extent,’ he said.

The department conducted 220 mobile court drives against the air polluters and filed 567 cases in a year until January 25, 2025. Around Tk 8 crore was realised in fines and punitive actions taken against over 150 brick kilns, said the department officials.

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University respiratory medicine professor Mohammed Atiqur Rahman said that air pollution is directly responsible for respiratory diseases, while it aggravates many other illnesses and co-morbidity.

Asthma, pneumonia, tuberculosis, bronchitis, skin diseases, diarrhoea and conjunctivitis are among the diseases triggered or aggravated by air pollution.

According to the data from the National Institute of Diseases of the Chest and Hospital, 1,76,441 patients received healthcare in the specialised hospital and research centre in 2023, and 1,046 of them died while undergoing treatment.

In 2022, total 947 people died in hospital, while 1,62,780 people received healthcare.

Public health experts said that air pollution was linked to roughly half of the premature deaths in Bangladesh.

A global study released in August 2023 by the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago found Bangladesh’s air to be the most polluted globally, gravely impacting citizens’ health and reducing average life expectancy by at least 6.8 years.​
 

Effective law and planning can control noise pollution

1738452679540.png

Noise levels in Dhaka often range between 80 and 100 dB, far exceeding the World Health Organization’s recommended safe threshold. FILE VISUAL: ALIZA RAHMAN

Dhaka, the sprawling capital of Bangladesh, is gripped by an escalating crisis of noise pollution, primarily fuelled by unregulated vehicular horns and unrelenting traffic chaos. This incessant barrage of sound has profound physiological and psychological consequences, inflicting damage that extends far beyond momentary discomfort. Noise levels in Dhaka often range between 80 and 100 decibels (dB), far exceeding the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended safe threshold of 55 dB for residential zones.

The city's chaotic traffic—a dense mix of different kinds of vehicles—is a primary contributor to this noise crisis. Smaller vehicles, particularly rickshaws and auto-rickshaws, often use outdated mechanical horns. In addition, unregulated loudspeaker use in social gatherings, religious events, and public announcements exacerbates the situation, with noise levels frequently exceeding 120 dB in Dhaka.

While addressing vehicular noise has been a focus, it is equally vital to regulate loudspeaker usage in communal and religious settings. Religious establishments and community programmes often use high-volume speakers to reach a wider audience. Although these practices are culturally significant, it is essential to regulate sound levels lawfully to prevent public health crises.

On the physiological front, chronic exposure to such high noise levels results in a host of health issues, including Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL), hypertension, tachycardia, cardiovascular disorders, increased risks of stroke and stress-related conditions. Prolonged exposure to high-decibel noise also impairs cognitive function, reduces work efficiency, and leads to sleep disturbances, chronic fatigue, and heightened anxiety. For children, developmental delays, including cognitive and language impairments, are common consequences. Pregnant women face increased risks of foetal stress, leading to potential complications like low birth weight and developmental delays. Other stress-related conditions like epilepsy, vasovagal attacks, speech interference, headaches, memory issues, and nervous breakdowns are exacerbated by prolonged exposure to noise pollution. Extremely loud and constant noise can also lead to gastritis, colitis, and even heart attacks.

The socioeconomic impacts are equally alarming. Sleep deprivation from nocturnal noise reduces productivity, increases absenteeism, and elevates healthcare costs. Chronic medical conditions linked to noise pollution strain the healthcare system, while the diminished quality of life can deter tourism and foreign investment, further complicating Dhaka's economic challenges. Recent studies indicate that Dhaka's economic loss in terms of GDP from noise pollution amounts to billions annually.

Bangladesh's legal framework for noise pollution is outlined in the Environment Conservation Rules, 1997, which categorises noise zones into residential, commercial, industrial, and silent zones with prescribed decibel limits. For example, the maximum allowable noise level for residential areas is 55 dB during the day and 45 dB at night.

The Sound Pollution Control Rules, 2006, which specifically addresses noise pollution, provides detailed guidelines for permissible sound levels in different zones and emphasises control measures for vehicular horns and public address systems. These rules mandate obtaining prior permission to use loudspeakers in public events and impose penalties for violations. However, enforcement remains a challenge due to the lack of awareness and insufficient monitoring resources.

Stringent regulations must be enforced for vehicular noise control. Licensing protocols should include mandatory decibel-limit testing for horns across all vehicle types. For smaller vehicles like rickshaws and auto-rickshaws, the law should mandate the replacement of horns with manual ringing mechanisms to reduce overall noise pollution.

Larger motorised vehicles must adhere to a 65 dB horn limit in urban areas, with penalties including fines, licence suspension or vehicle confiscation for repeat violations. Newly manufactured vehicles must integrate advanced noise-reduction technologies, and retrofitting older models should be mandatory within a defined timeline.

Loudspeaker usage should be similarly regulated. Public address systems must include decibel limiters, capping sound levels at 75 dB in residential areas and 85 dB in commercial zones. Special attention should be paid to noise-sensitive areas such as schools, hospitals, and residential neighbourhoods, with stricter sound limits and monitoring enforced.

Technological advancements can also play a pivotal role. Smart noise sensors, strategically installed in high-traffic areas, can monitor sound levels, enabling authorities to identify hotspots and penalise violators. AI-driven traffic management systems can optimise vehicle flow, reducing congestion and unnecessary honking. Additionally, noise-dampening technologies, such as soundproofing measures at large public venues and community centres, should be encouraged. Mobile apps enabling residents to report noise violations, coupled with AI-powered monitoring systems, can transform noise regulation in Dhaka.

Public awareness is another cornerstone of effective noise control. Campaigns to raise awareness about the health hazards of noise pollution should target schools, universities and workplaces. Media must highlight the physiological and psychological toll of unchecked noise pollution, fostering a collective sense of responsibility. Community initiatives should encourage behavioural changes, such as minimising honking and adopting quieter practices in both residential and commercial zones.

Collaboration among key stakeholders is essential for sustained progress. The Bangladesh Road Transport Authority (BRTA), the Department of Environment, law enforcement agencies, and public health experts must work together to implement comprehensive solutions. Pilot projects in high-noise areas can serve as testing grounds for new initiatives before broader adoption. All vehicles, regardless of size, should undergo regular noise compliance inspections during licensing and roadworthiness evaluations. Swift penalties for violations and consistent enforcement of these regulations will be key to ensuring compliance.

Addressing noise pollution in Dhaka is not merely an environmental concern, it is a public health imperative. By implementing stronger regulations, leveraging technology, and fostering awareness, the city can significantly reduce the impact of relentless noise. This transformation will enhance the quality of life for millions, reduce the socioeconomic burden, and create a healthier, more productive urban environment.

S M Muhaiminul Islam is a researcher and member of the Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh (IEB).

Dr Nishat Tasnim is a physician and alumnus of Sher-E-Bangla Medical College.​
 

Bangladesh sees one of warmest winters
Emran Hossain 03 February, 2025, 00:14

1738538204271.png


The coldest month January ended rather warm, with barely any cold wave days, setting this winter well on the trajectory to become one of the warmest in the country’s history.

February is the last month of the three-month-long winter when cold waves occur but the temperature does not drop as much as in January, the second half of which coincides with the first half of the formidable winter month on the Bangla calendar —Magh.

Magh, used to bring punishing cold, so much so that it spawned myths like Magh makes even tigers shiver, has only 10 days to go with Sunday’s temperature hovered around 30C over vast swathes of the country, particularly cities and other urban areas.

Many said that they used ceiling fans day and night in the current peak of Magh with the Bangladesh Meteorological Department predicting the possibility of a brief cold wave before winter officially ends this month.

‘The average minimum temperature in January was 1.1C higher than what is usual,’ meteorologist AKM Nazmul Hoque told New Age.

January saw its lowest minimum temperature to drop to 7.3C on January 10 in Tetulia, which is also the lowest temperature recorded so far this winter.

Temperature dropped frequently below 7C over the last 15 years. Only four other Januaries have been as warm as the immediate past one, showed an analysis of 44 years of data preserved by the meteorology department.

The temperature did not drop below 7.3C, as it happened last in January in 2025, also in 1982, 1986, 2002 and 2009.

On January 28, 2024, the lowest temperature dropped to 5C at Dimla of Nilphamari. On January 20, the year before in 2023, the lowest temperature was recorded to be 5.6C in Srimangal of Moulvibazar.

In 2022, the lowest temperature was 6C, recorded on January 31 in Tetulia of Panchagarh.

Four cold waves, two lasting just one day each and the rest two three and four days, were recorded in this January.

January turning out this warm presented a sharp contrast to the beginning of winter in December when temperature saw a sharp drop middle of the month ushering in a cold wave. The temperature dropped to 8.4C on December 13 with the season’s first cold wave lasting for three days. The December 2024 was the coldest regarding the recorded lowest temperature in the 44 years since 1981, showed an analysis of the BMD data. The first cold wave this winter hit three weeks earlier than last year.

A cold wave, which can be mild, moderate and severe, reflects the fall of air temperature over a large area below 10C.

‘The circulation of air has been very strange this year,’ said Bazlur Rashid, a senior BMD meteorologist and climate researcher.

Winter arrives with the arrival of westerly, wind blowing from the west to east, particularly from the Mediterranean Sea, he explained.

This winter there has been a constant flow of wind from the Mediterranean, without almost any break, which was unusual, and the wind got blocked around Afghanistan, he said.

The strong westerly, which flows close to the surface, prevented Jet wind, upper atmosphere wind flowing above 18,000 feet, from taking its usual course.

Jet wind flows from the east to west, at a high speed exceeding 100kmph. The temperature in the jet wind starts at -20C. The temperature can reach -50C.

Jet wind descends close to the surface when westerly weakens, increasing the feeling of cold, which did not happen this year. Jet wind also got stuck around Afghanistan, almost never reaching either West Bengal or Bangladesh.

‘Jet wind needs to come down to 12,000 feet or even lower to lower the temperature and give the feeling of cold,’ said Bazlu, adding that the wind remained above 15,000 feet so far.

Jet wind usually passes over Bangladesh and its adjacent West Bengal during winter, which had not happened this winter.

Cloudless sky and absence of fog along with high land surface temperature has made the current winter feel rather warm, meteorologists have observed.

January was 99 per cent rain deficient as well, while December was 91 per cent rain deficient. Back to back low pressure formed in November and December, potentially contributing to cloudless skies by pulling clouds into them.

The temperature observations from Bangladesh showed a clear climate signal, with fewer and shorter cold waves in the recent decades, according to a BMD report titled ‘Changing climate of Bangladesh’, released in February last year.

Cold waves became concentrated in January in Dhaka division, the report said. There were some cases of cold waves in December and February as well, according to the report.

In one of the coldest areas of the country, Rangpur division, cold waves started early or mid-December throughout most of the period studied—1980–2023. The northern district recorded a cold wave even in November in 1981. But the period of cold waves appears to have been delayed over the past few years, starting at the third or fourth week of December or even in January, the report said.

Historically, cold waves were frequent in January and February but in recent years the end of February had been without any, the report said about Rangpur. In Rajshahi division, known for extreme heat during summer and intense cold during winter, the period of cold waves started in the first week of December up to 2006 but then decreased, indicating a delay in cold wave conditions.

In Rajshahi division in 2023, no cold spell was recorded in December at all. The number of cold wave days in December and February has decreased also, while a large number of cold wave days were observed in January throughout the period 1980–2023 in the division, the BMD report said.​
 

Our development model is poisoning Dhaka

1738623017465.png

People are being forced to organise movements to protect what's left of open, green spaces like Panthakunja Park. FILE PHOTO: PRABIR DAS

After the fall of a deeply corrupt and irresponsible government through a mass uprising, we believed that many things would improve. But our hopes have been shattered. One of our most critical concerns is related to survival—our ability to simply breathe and live.

Dhaka's air pollution remains among the worst in the world. The city continues to hold the infamous record of having the most hazardous air globally. When the Air Quality Index (AQI) exceeds 300, the air is classified as "extremely dangerous." In some areas of Dhaka, AQI has surpassed 400, even approaching 500. Even on Sunday morning, Dhaka had the worst air in the world. At such levels, the concentration of harmful particulate matter in the air makes it dangerous for humans. The situation is dire, particularly for children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing health conditions. The rate at which cases of respiratory diseases, neurological disorders, fever, cough, and lung infections are rising is alarming.

Despite these circumstances, we have not seen the government take meaningful steps to address the crisis. The situation has deteriorated to the point where people are forced to organise movements simply to protect open, green spaces like Bahadur Shah Park, Tetultola playground, Panthakunja Park, and Khilgaon playground in Dhaka, as well as in other cities. The previous government showed complete negligence to these issues, and we had hoped that the new interim government would be more responsive. However, this has not been the case.

For instance, the Panthakunja Park, which used to be a small open space with some trees, has been taken over for the construction of a ramp of the Dhaka Elevated Expressway. To prevent this, some young activists have been protesting on site for more than 50 days, and concerned citizens have expressed solidarity with them, yet the government has not responded positively. Instead, officials claim that these projects cannot be cancelled or revised. However, the ramp being built in Panthakunja was not a part of the original plan. It was introduced later to benefit certain private companies seeking to maximise their profits. An article by Kallol Mustafa recently published in this daily has detailed how such projects are often linked to private interests rather than genuine public needs.

There have been numerous proposals and projects to protect Dhaka's environment, including efforts to clean up the Buriganga River and other nearby rivers, to clean up the city's air. Loans worth hundreds of crores of taka have been organised from the World Bank and other lenders in the name of the environment's improvement. Yet, there are no visible results. Where has this money gone? Many argue that protecting the environment requires significant financial investment, but this is incorrect. Environmental protection does not require excessive funds, rather it requires stopping disastrous spending. In fact, unnecessary investments and projects that serve private interests are actively destroying the environment.

One of the primary causes of environmental degradation in Dhaka is unregulated construction. Without proper planning or assessment of long-term consequences, construction activities are going on unchecked. The construction sector now accounts for around eight percent of Bangladesh's GDP (2021). To maintain this economic growth, open spaces are being filled in, parks are being encroached upon, and land is being leased for commercial purposes. Even historic places like Bahadur Shah Park are being leased out for commercial purposes.

The fundamental issue here is that no serious effort is being put into reducing air pollution in Dhaka. Many of the environmental projects funded by international funding agencies such as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank (ADB) have ironically contributed to its destruction instead. For example, under the guise of "social forestry" projects, natural forests in Bangladesh at various locations have been destroyed and replaced with commercial plantations of eucalyptus and acacia, which have had a devastating ecological impact. The destruction of the Chakaria Sundarbans is a prime example of that. In the name of energy development, Bangladesh has also built multiple coal-fired power plants, significantly increasing air pollution. While projects aimed at reducing pollution exist, the primary beneficiaries are consultants, bureaucrats who enjoy foreign trips, and individuals engaged in import-dependent activities.

Among other major causes for pollution are brick kilns, deforestation and river encroachments. Addressing these issues does not require massive financial investments; rather, it demands proper planning and decisive government action. Recently, the government attempted to ban polythene bags, but it was ineffective. One of the key reasons was the significant financial investment and employment tied to the polythene industry. Transitioning away from polythene to natural fibre-based alternatives requires a well-planned approach, including consultation with industry stakeholders and ensuring the availability of viable substitutes. But instead of implementing a structured transition plan, the government simply issued a top-down directive, which predictably failed.

Bangladesh has no shortage of natural fibres, and we could have developed a thriving industry around environment-friendly products to replace polythene. Unfortunately, there has been no development in the jute industry. Loans from the World Bank, rather than promoting jute-based alternatives, contributed to the industry's decline. Meanwhile, because of indiscriminate use of cheap polythene, Dhaka's drainage system remains clogged, leading to severe waterlogging and further river pollution.

Dhaka could have been a much healthier city. Surrounded by rivers, it had the potential to be an environmentally sustainable urban area. If its rivers had been preserved, its open spaces protected, and large-scale afforestation efforts undertaken, the city's air quality would have significantly improved. Adequate greenery—fruit-bearing trees, flowering plants, and natural forests—could have dramatically reduced disease rates and provided a much healthier living environment.

Instead, Dhaka is surrounded by countless brick kilns, despite repeated discussions about their harmful impact. Most of these kilns operate illegally. They must be shut down, and viable alternatives to bricks must be introduced.

If immediate steps are not taken, Dhaka will fully transform into a city of sick people. We are already witnessing a sharp increase in illnesses, and this will only worsen if urgent measures are not implemented. There are no playgrounds for children, no open spaces where people can breathe fresh air, and the water we drink is contaminated. Citizens cannot even enjoy a clean and peaceful time by the river.

This extreme deprivation stems from the current development model, which prioritises profit maximisation for a select group over public welfare. Projects are designed to benefit certain influential groups through lobbying, while the common people—who bear the consequences—are entirely excluded from the decision-making process.

The present government frequently talks about reforms, but what kind of reforms are they referring to? Reform is not an abstract concept; it requires concrete actions. True reform should involve policies that protect Dhaka's residents and their right to a liveable city.

Anu Muhammad is a former professor of economics from Jahangirnagar University.​
 

Saving rivers is our duty
Outcome of govt actions must be more visible

1738623403222.png

VISUAL: STAR

It is hardly surprising that pollution sources around Dhaka's rivers have nearly doubled over the last five years, given the unchecked degradation of rivers and other waterbodies in the country. Industrial units, government agencies, and private individuals have all contributed equally and untiringly to poisoning the waters of Buriganga, Turag, Shitalakhya, Balu, Karnatali, and Dhaleswari rivers—Dhaka's lifelines for centuries. Despite repeated calls to save them, successive governments have failed to take effective measures to prevent pollution or hold the polluters and encroachers accountable, emboldening them further.

As a result, according to a recent River and Delta Research Centre (RDRC) study, the number of pollution sources—industries, kitchen markets, dockyards, municipal sewerage lines, private sewerage outlets, and waste dumping stations—has surged from 608 to 1,024 in just five years. Even sluice gates and service canals are contaminating major rivers like Buriganga and Shitalakhya by channelling pollutants directly into them. All this means that the Tk 1,000 crore spent by the previous government on projects to protect Dhaka's rivers literally went down the drain. Evidently, corruption and political favouritism compromised its commitment to saving rivers.

The interim government, free from such biases and with environment activist Syeda Rizwana Hasan in its ranks, is expected to show greater dedication to protecting rivers and the environment. However, while efforts to restore 19 canals across Dhaka have recently begun, actions against major river polluters and encroachers have remained inadequate. No one expects the government to solve the deep-rooted issues involved with river protection overnight, but its measures must be more visible, especially against key offenders, to deter others.

Additionally, the National River Conservation Commission (NRCC) must be reactivated and empowered without any further delay. It is baffling that this vital agency is still operating with minimal staff months after the interim government revoked its chairman's appointment. Further delays in making it functional will only worsen pollution and allow more rivers to fall to encroachers. Ultimately, saving our rivers is a collective responsibility. While the government must act decisively, citizens, too, must refrain from polluting activities. Our rivers are essential for our survival—we all must do the best we can to protect them.​
 

St Martin’s Island: Clean-up effort to be launched from mid-Feb

1738711184467.png

Photo: Sharif Sarwar/File

A clean-up effort will be launched in St Martin's Island under Teknaf upazila of Cox's Bazar in mid-February following suspension on tourism activities for next nine months.

According to the directives of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, the Cox's Bazar district administration will coordinate the entire operation, said Mohammad Salauddin, deputy commissioner of the district.

"The tourism season has ended and we are now focusing on reviving the island's natural environment which sustained damages due to tourism. Local residents will be involved in the activities to boost their income," he said.

"Earlier, in December and January, a total 14 tonnes of plastic and polythene wastes were collected from the island in exchange for food items including rice, oil, lentils and biscuits," the DC added.

The Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change in October last year restricted tourist visits to just three months of the year -- November, December, and January – with a daily limit of 2,000 tourists, in order to reduce pollution and protect the island's environment and biodiversity.

The Department of Environment in 1999 declared St Martin's Island an Ecologically Critical Area. In 2023, the government designated 1,743 square kilometres of the Bay of Bengal adjacent to St Martin's Island as a protected area under the Wildlife Act.

The first initiative to control tourism on the island was taken in August 2020. The government assigned the Center for Geographical Information Services (CEGIS) to conduct a study. Following the research, CEGIS concluded that the primary cause of environmental destruction in St Martin's Island is unregulated tourism, adding that tourists should not be allowed to stay overnight on the island under any circumstances.

Although the island has a daily capacity of 2,000 visitors, some 10,000 to 12,000 tourists travelled there every day even in last year. At least 230 hotels and motels have been established illegally without any waste management systems, leading to an accumulation of sewage and plastic wastes across the island.

A study found that the island's water contains 10 times more bacteria than the mainland. Crabs are being caught for tourist consumption, while boat traffic and campfires are endangering three rare species of sea turtles. The excessive number of tourists is also causing a sharp decline in groundwater levels.

In 1980, the island had 141 coral species, but by 2016, the number dropped to 41. Research organisations warned that without urgent conservation efforts, St Martin's Island could lose all the coral species by 2045.

"We have to save St Martin's Island to carry on the tourism business," said Abu Morshed Chowdhury, president of Cox's Bazar Chamber of Commerce and Industries.

"The reduction in tourist numbers is now helping to protect the island's biodiversity," said Dipak Sharma, president of Cox's Bazar Forest and Environment Conservation Council.

Md Zamir Uddin, deputy director of DoE in Cox's Bazar, said they are assessing the damage sustained due to tourism in the island and how much manpower is needed to organise the clean-up activities in order to set the work plan to this end.

Mujibor Rahman, chairman of St Martin union parishad, said people of island and UNDP staffs have already begun cleaning up the beaches and other areas after the tourists left the coral island.

The hotel owners and their staffs, who came from outside, are wrapping up their belongings to leave the island, he added.​
 

Save elephants, protect biodiversity
Govt must restore forest lands, ensure safe elephant corridors

1738796821469.png

VISUAL: STAR

The deaths of several Asian elephants in the Chattogram region in recent times raise questions about our commitment to wildlife conservation. According to media reports, more than 30 elephants have been found dead in Cox's Bazar's Ukhiya and Teknaf upazilas and Chattogram's Anwara, Karnaphuli, and Banshkhali upazilas over the past decade. Last year, seven elephant deaths were recorded in Ukhiya and Teknaf alone.

Many of these elephants were electrocuted or shot dead, while others succumbed to hunger, malnutrition, and disease due to food shortages. Expanding human settlements, economic zones, and infrastructure built on elephant habitats and migratory routes are disrupting their natural movement, which typically spans 70-80 kilometres daily in search of food and water. In Ukhiya and Teknaf, the Rohingya refugee camps as well as the barbed-wire fence built by Myanmar government along the Bangladesh-Myanmar border have blocked five of the eight existing elephant corridors in Cox's Bazar, making at least 15 water bodies inaccessible to the area's 205 elephants.

Similarly, in Anwara and Karnaphuli, establishing the Korean Export Processing Zone (KEPZ) and the China Economic Zone by clearing forests—and without undertaking proper environmental feasibility studies, one may add—has further disrupted the life and habitat of the elephant population. Environmental conservation guidelines were also ignored during the construction of the Dohazari-Cox's Bazar railway line, creating additional barriers for these animals. Alarmingly, many of the elephant deaths have occurred in reserved forests and wildlife sanctuaries. What is the purpose of declaring an area a "wildlife sanctuary" if we cannot ensure the safety of the wildlife within it?

There is reason to expect stronger action from the current interim government which claims itself to be pro-environment. In October, the environment adviser helped establish a committee in the KEPZ area to ensure the protection of wild elephants. However, more action is needed across all regions where human-elephant conflicts have been intensifying. The consequences of habitat degradation and destruction extend to humans as well, with 136 people estimated to have been killed by elephants in the last six years.

The government, therefore, must take urgent, visible measures to prevent deforestation, restore forest lands, implement reforestation initiatives, and ensure that the natural routes for elephant movement are never violated under any circumstances. Anti-nature infrastructure development projects undertaken by the Awami League government should also be critically reviewed. We must find a way to coexist with other species without endangering their survival.​
 

Members Online

Latest Posts

Latest Posts