Donate ☕
201 Military Defense Forums
[🇧🇩] - Banking System in Bangladesh | Page 50 | PKDefense
Home Post Alerts Inbox Watch Videos

[🇧🇩] Banking System in Bangladesh

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Banking System in Bangladesh
260
8K
More threads by Saif


One-third of local private banks keep NPLs below 10%

Seventeen lenders keep healthier balance sheets amid rising industry bad loans through disciplined lending, close monitoring and strong governance.

1765762257818.webp


Seventeen domestic banks have managed to keep their balance sheets relatively clean, with non-performing loans (NPLs) below 10 percent, at a time when most of their market peers are struggling with soaring bad debt, according to central bank data.

The lenders are City Bank, Prime Bank, BRAC Bank, Pubali Bank, Eastern Bank, Mutual Trust Bank, Midland Bank, Meghna Bank, Shahjalal Islami Bank, Dhaka Bank, Jamuna Bank, NCC Bank, Trust Bank, Uttara Bank, Bengal Commercial Bank, Community Bank and Citizens Bank.

Currently, there are 52 local banks in the country, while the industry average NPL stands at 36 percent.

Industry insiders said these 17 banks limited bad loans through cautious lending, stronger credit risk assessment, diversified loan portfolios, close monitoring of borrowers, and timely recovery efforts, even as widespread corruption weakened asset quality across much of the sector.

They said improved corporate governance and a focus on quality growth rather than aggressive expansion also played a key role.

Some newer banks, with smaller loan portfolios, benefited from lower default exposure compared with older lenders burdened by legacy loans.

Among the seventeen banks, newly licensed Citizens Bank posted the lowest NPL ratio at 1.74 percent, while Jamuna Bank recorded the highest within the group at 9.06 percent as of September this year.

According to the central bank data, NPLs at City Bank, Prime Bank, Eastern Bank, BRAC Bank and Bengal Commercial Bank are below five percent.

At the end of September this year, City Bank reported its non-performing loans at Tk 2,439 crore, equivalent to 4.76 percent of its total disbursement.

Mashrur Arefin, managing director of City Bank, said that the bank's NPL ratio stood at 3.6 percent in 2024, well below the industry average. "In 2025, it is expected to fall further to below 3 percent."

"This improvement reflects the bank's strong and disciplined governance framework, where credit decisions are made professionally with no interference from the board, and where business and credit risk are two completely separate functions," he told The Daily Star.

According to Arefin, a well-diversified loan portfolio reduces concentration risk, while effective credit control systems allow for close monitoring of accounts.

Proactive recovery initiatives, timely provisioning, and strong capital and liquidity management have further strengthened asset quality, he said, adding that these factors enable City Bank to manage NPLs sustainably despite a challenging banking environment.

Ali Reza Iftekhar, managing director and CEO of Eastern Bank, said that the commercial lender's NPLs have remained around 3 percent for the last 33 years.

"We carefully screen and assess clients at the onboarding stage. In addition, we keep them under continuous and strong monitoring, which is why our NPL ratio remains low."

The CEO said the bank has a large recovery team organised on a bucket-wise basis. One team handles loans delayed by one to 30 days, while another takes over when delays exceed that period.

"Each team works independently, and there is a separate legal team as well. This is how we conduct our banking operations," he added.

Until September this year, Prime Bank's total disbursed loans stood at Tk 32,784 crore, of which Tk 1,316 crore became defaulted, representing only 4.01 percent.

"All our credit proposals are vetted for financial viability and sustainability at the time of approval," said Hassan O. Rashid, chief executive officer of Prime Bank.

He added that after disbursement, the bank monitors the loan and business performance of borrowers closely. "We avoid sectors where NPLs are high and put a lot of effort into recovery."

At the end of September this year, defaulted loans at BRAC Bank stood at Tk 2,401 crore, or 3.58 percent of its total disbursed loans.

The bank's board consists of eight directors, seven of whom are independent. It also includes economists, bankers, and other experienced professionals, establishing BRAC Bank as a strong institution.

"BRAC Bank's owners do not interfere in management, while the board formulates policy and management handles operations," said Tareq Refat Ullah Khan, managing director and CEO of the bank.

He told The Daily Star that BRAC Bank places strong emphasis on its recovery department, which is weak in many other banks.

"We recruit experienced professionals in this area because recovery is one of our core priorities. In addition, we give opportunities to problematic borrowers by allowing them to continue their businesses, which helps us in loan recovery."

At the end of September, NPLs at Mutual Trust Bank stood at Tk 3,553 crore, or 6.83 percent of total disbursed loans.

Syed Mahbubur Rahman, managing director and CEO, said that the bank follows proper procedures when disbursing loans.

"We did not act on anyone's recommendation or instruction," he told The Daily Star, adding that even the board did not influence management activities. "That is why we have been able to keep our NPLs low."

He said the bank declined many seemingly viable projects because the assessment suggested problems with the sponsors' repayment behaviour and planning.

"We did not sanction loans under any influence. Loans are approved based on documentation reviewed by each department separately. The board and management of the bank do not tolerate any conflict of interest," added Rahman.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Public money at risk
Tackling wilful default is State's responsibility

Shah Md Ahsan Habib
Published :
Dec 17, 2025 23:55
Updated :
Dec 17, 2025 23:55

1766020966903.webp


Non-performing loans, commonly known as NPLs, are often discussed as if they represent a moral failure of the banking system. In reality, they are a standard business outcome of lending, embedded in the structure of modern finance. Banking is not the business of certainty; it is the business of calculated risk. Banks lend against expectations of future cash flows, market stability, and borrower behaviour, none of which can ever be guaranteed. As a result, a portion of loans will inevitably fall into distress. This is neither abnormal nor undesirable. A certain level of NPLs is a natural outcome of economic activity and, paradoxically, a sign that banks are supporting growth rather than remaining overly risk-averse.

Globally accepted banking practice is built on this understanding. That is why tools such as loan rescheduling, restructuring, refinancing, and rehabilitation exist. These mechanisms are not extraordinary concessions; they are routine instruments designed to manage outcomes when credit does not perform as planned. Rescheduling addresses temporary liquidity stress, while restructuring aligns debt obligations with revised business realities. When applied prudently, these tools preserve economic value, protect bank balance sheets, and allow viable businesses to recover from shocks. In this sense, NPLs are part of the normal risk anatomy of banking, alongside credit, liquidity, and market risks. Expecting a zero-NPL banking system is not prudent; it is a denial of how economies function.

When loans become non-performing due to genuine economic or business reasons, they remain firmly within the scope of banking and regulatory management. Banks classify such loans, maintain provisions, intensify recovery efforts, and, when necessary, write them off transparently. Regulators define the rules, supervise compliance, and ensure losses are recognised rather than hidden. A healthy financial system is not defined by the absence of NPLs, but by its ability to identify stress early, absorb losses, and resolve problems efficiently. Excessive fear of NPLs often leads to extreme risk aversion, restricting credit to productive sectors and slowing economic growth. Supporting genuine NPL resolution is therefore not leniency; it is sound economic management.

This logic, however, collapses the moment default becomes wilful. A borrower who has the capacity to repay but deliberately chooses not to, or who diverts funds, falsifies information, or exploits regulatory loopholes, is not participating in a normal credit cycle. Such behaviour does not belong in the category of NPLs arising from business stress. Wilful default is fundamentally different in nature, and treating it as just another non-performing loan is a serious conceptual and policy mistake. It is not a banking inconvenience; it is a breach of trust and, in many cases, financial misconduct.

An NPL reflects inability to pay; wilful default reflects unwillingness to pay despite ability. When these two are grouped, accountability disappears. Repeated rescheduling or cosmetic restructuring of wilful default cases does not resolve the problem; it institutionalises it. It sends a dangerous signal that deliberate non-repayment carries limited consequences, turning default into a calculated business strategy rather than an economic failure. Once intent to evade repayment or misuse funds is established, the issue should move beyond balance-sheet treatment into legal and punitive domains. Without this distinction, the entire NPL framework becomes distorted.

This distinction becomes even more critical when one considers a basic but often overlooked fact: banks primarily lend public money. Deposits placed by individuals, businesses, and institutions form the core funding base of the banking system. When a borrower wilfully defaults, the loss is not borne by an abstract balance sheet; it represents misappropriation of public money. Depositors, taxpayers, and ultimately the wider public absorb the cost through weakened banks, reduced credit availability, and, in extreme cases, state-funded recapitalisation.

Viewed through this lens, wilful default is not merely a private dispute between a bank and a borrower. It is a matter of public interest. The protection of depositors’ funds and the integrity of the financial system impose a clear obligation on policymakers and the legal system to intervene decisively. Banks can initiate recovery actions, but they cannot investigate fraud, seize assets at scale, or impose criminal sanctions. That responsibility lies squarely with the state.

Bangladesh’s banking sector illustrates why this public-interest perspective is essential. Over the past decade, the country has experienced a persistent and now accelerating rise in defaulted loans. According to Bangladesh Bank data, total defaulted loans exceeded Tk 6.4 trillion in 2025, pushing default ratios to historically unprecedented levels. While global shocks and domestic economic pressures have contributed, the scale and persistence of the problem point to structural weaknesses rather than temporary stress.

This is not a purely cyclical phenomenon driven by inflation, exchange-rate volatility, or post-pandemic adjustment. The accumulation of bad loans over time reflects systemic gaps in credit governance, enforcement, and accountability. High NPL levels constrain banks’ lending capacity, erode profitability, and weaken confidence among depositors and investors. Over time, this undermines financial intermediation and slows economic growth.

Regional and global comparisons further highlight the seriousness of the issue. In most developing and neighbouring economies, NPL ratios are typically contained within a range of 2 to 6 per cent. Advanced economies often operate with ratios below 2 per cent. Even countries that have experienced severe banking crises have managed to reduce NPLs through decisive reforms, strong legal enforcement, and specialised resolution frameworks. Bangladesh’s significantly higher ratios suggest not just economic stress, but institutional tolerance for weak repayment discipline.

Within this broader NPL picture, the rise of wilful default is particularly damaging. Although precise data remain limited, multiple investigations and disclosures indicate that a substantial share of large defaults involve repeat borrowers, fund diversion, or strategic non-payment. These cases are often concentrated among borrowers with sufficient influence or access to exploit weak enforcement mechanisms. The result is a skewed system in which honest borrowers face tighter credit and higher costs, while deliberate defaulters face limited consequences.

The economic cost of this imbalance is significant. Wilful defaults lock up scarce capital, distort credit allocation, and weaken banks’ ability to support productive sectors. Depositors bear the risk indirectly through weaker institutions, while taxpayers may ultimately bear the burden through recapitalisation or implicit guarantees. Over time, this erodes trust in the financial system and damages the broader economy.

It is therefore essential to recognise that not all defaults are banking problems of the same kind. Genuine NPLs can largely be managed at the bank level with regulatory support. Improved credit appraisal, early warning systems, realistic provisioning, and transparent reporting can significantly reduce their impact. Regulators can strengthen supervision and discourage practices such as loan evergreening or repeated rescheduling without recovery prospects. These are technical and managerial challenges, and banks are structurally equipped to address them.

Wilful default, by contrast, cannot be resolved by banks acting alone. Banks are custodians of public funds, not enforcement agencies. Expecting them to recover misappropriated public money without strong legal backing is unrealistic. Once wilful intent is established, responsibility must shift decisively to policymakers, regulators, courts, and law enforcement agencies. Asset tracing, seizure, prosecution, and timely adjudication are essential to restore deterrence and public confidence.

Bangladesh’s NPL challenge is therefore not merely a banking sector issue; it is an economy-wide governance issue. Weak contract enforcement, prolonged legal processes, regulatory forbearance, and inconsistent policy signals create an environment where default is insufficiently penalised. Banks operate within this ecosystem; they do not define it. Expecting the banking industry to resolve a problem rooted in legal, political, and institutional structures is neither realistic nor fair.

Policymakers must shoulder primary responsibility. Strengthening insolvency and recovery laws, ensuring fast-track resolution of large default cases, clearly defining and publicly identifying wilful defaulters, and insulating credit decisions from undue influence are critical steps. Without strong legal and policy support, even the most disciplined banking reforms will have limited impact.

In conclusion, non-performing loans arising from genuine reasons should be recognised as a natural and manageable outcome of banking activity and supported through structured, transparent resolution mechanisms. Wilful default, however, is a clear case of public money misappropriation and must be treated as such. Bangladesh’s experience demonstrates the danger of blurring this distinction. Unless policymakers and the legal system take decisive ownership of the issue in the interest of the public, the NPL burden will continue to grow, threatening not only the banking system but the stability of the entire economy.

The writer is Professor, Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management (BIBM), Dhaka.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Bangladesh Bank to verify all loans above $200 million to ‘restore governance, accountability’

bdnews24.com
Published :
Dec 18, 2025 19:29
Updated :
Dec 18, 2025 19:30

1766104376895.webp


Bangladesh Bank Governor Ahsan H Mansur has announced an initiative to verify all loans exceeding $200 million as part of efforts to “restore governance and public confidence” in the banking sector.

Speaking at a seminar in Dhaka on Thursday, he said the banking sector is “gradually improving” from difficult times.

“We have maintained public trust, and the world is surprised that Bangladesh’s banking system is functioning. To ensure good governance and restore customer confidence, we will regularly review whether these large loans have landed correctly.”​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Banking must be free from political influence: experts
Staff Correspondent 18 December, 2025, 23:31

1766107245324.webp

BB governor Ahsan H Mansur, CPD executive director Fahmida Khatun and MTB managing director Syed Mahbubur Rahman, among others, are present at a discussion titled ‘Banking Sector Reforms: Challenges and Way Forward’ in the capital on Thursday. | Press release photo

The banking sector must remain free from political interference and be managed professionally with government support to restore confidence and stability, financial experts said on Thursday.

They made the remarks at a discussion titled ‘Banking Sector Reforms: Challenges and Way Forward’, organised by the Economic Reporters’ Forum in Dhaka, against the backdrop of mounting loan defaults and deepening governance failures in the financial system.

Speakers stressed that political parties must clearly state their plans for banking sector reform in their election manifestos and remain accountable for those commitments.

While government oversight is necessary to safeguard public interest, they said, politically motivated intervention in bank management has repeatedly undermined discipline and risk management.

Bangladesh Bank governor Ahsan H Mansur called for a firm political consensus to keep banks free from interference.

He said protecting the banking sector from political motives was a moral responsibility of all political parties. Some parties, he noted, have already pledged to strengthen banks and ensure the independence of the central bank, and the country now expects those promises to be implemented in practice.

Mansur emphasised that the financial sector is the backbone of the economy and warned that economic progress would remain fragile unless banking reform receives priority both in election manifestos and post-election policymaking.

He strongly pushed for full autonomy of Bangladesh Bank, arguing that international-standard legislation is needed to shield the governor from political pressure. Removal from office, he said, should only be possible through court rulings based on proven misconduct or corruption.

Centre for Policy Dialogue executive director Fahmida Khatun echoed the governor’s concerns, describing the upcoming national election as a critical turning point.

She said political parties must clearly spell out how they intend to discipline and reform the banking sector.

Past political interference, weak policy enforcement and unchecked lending had pushed the sector to the brink, she said.

According to Fahmida, defaulted loans have now climbed to Tk 6.44 lakh crore, close to the proposed Tk 7.9 lakh crore national budget for 2025–26.

Mutual Trust Bank managing director Syed Mahbubur Rahman said that the crisis intensified after the takeover of Islami Bank in 2017, which opened the door to widespread malpractice.

While recent political changes have brought some improvement, he cautioned that lasting reform will depend on sustained political will rather than technical banking measures alone, he said.

As part of the reform drive, governor Mansur said that all loans exceeding Tk 20 crore would undergo fresh scrutiny.

The reassessment aims to uncover past irregularities and restore discipline in a sector burdened by weak governance and soaring defaults.

He warned that bank officials and directors would be held accountable if such loans lack proper collateral, adding that the central bank would not conceal facts even if the true picture appears alarming.

Defaulted loans, he said, have reached nearly 36 per cent of total disbursements.

Mansur said that the legal process to merge five banks has already been completed.

Within days, the newly formed Sammilito Islami Bank will change logos, signboards and branch names, and overlapping branches will be consolidated or relocated to underserved areas, he added.

Alongside the merger, nine financial institutions will be liquidated.

He assured that general depositors would receive their full funds, while institutional depositors would get partial repayments, and that all deposits of the merged banks would remain safe.

On reserves, the governor said Bangladesh would rebuild foreign

exchange buffers through its own capacity rather than external borrowing, targeting $34–35 billion by the end of the fiscal year through market-based dollar purchases.

Explaining the cancellation of incentive bonuses for bank employees, he said responsibility for failures extends beyond top management, as lending decisions are largely made at branch level, and officials who ignore risks or irregularities will also face consequences.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Bangladesh Bank plans to raise reserves to $35b by year-end: Governor
Within December, non-performing loans also likely to come down, Ahsan H Mansur says at ERF seminar

1766108505424.webp


The central bank has a plan to raise foreign exchange reserves to $35 billion within this year, Bangladesh Bank Governor Ahsan H Mansur said today.

Bangladesh's foreign exchange reserves stood at $32.48 billion as of December 17 this year, but under the International Monetary Fund's BPM6 method, the figure was $27.81 billion, according to the latest Bangladesh Bank data.

The governor said steps taken by the central bank have helped stabilise the overall financial sector, adding that governance weaknesses remain a major concern in the banking sector.

The banking regulator has been able to keep the banking sector stable and maintain public confidence despite persistent structural challenges, he said at a seminar titled "Banking Sector Reform: Challenges and Way Forward," organised by the Economic Reporters Forum in Dhaka.

"Several banks are facing huge capital shortfalls and high levels of non-performing loans (NPLs)," he said, adding that Bangladesh currently has the highest NPL ratio in the world.

However, Mansur said he hopes the situation will begin to improve soon.

"Within December, NPLs are likely to come down," he said, adding that restoring sound governance in banks is a priority, though it will take time to deliver sustainable results.

The BB governor also addressed recent consolidation moves in the sector, saying depositors of the five merged banks would get their money back soon.

He expressed hope that the merged banks would be able to make profits within their first year of operation.

On the non-bank financial institution (NBFI) sector, Mansur said nine NBFIs would be liquidated under the regulator's resolution plan.

"Shareholders of those institutions will not receive anything, but depositors will get their funds back," he said.

Fahmida Khatun, executive director of the Centre for Policy Dialogue, and Syed Mahbubur Rahman, managing director and CEO of Mutual Trust Bank, also spoke at the event.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Members Online

⤵︎

Latest Posts

Latest Posts