Donate ☕
201 Military Defense Forums
[🇧🇩] - Energy Security of Bangladesh | Page 102 | PKDefense
Home Login Nation Wars Watch Videos
Serious discussion on defense, geopolitics, and global security.

[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
508
16K
More threads by Saif

Economy to take a beating for acute gas crisis​


1708049762114.png


The severe gas crisis is increasing the cost of manufacturing of goods for both local and export markets, which may ultimately hit the pockets of consumers in the form of higher prices and the economy since overseas sales could see further slowdown.

Owing to lower generation of gas locally, factories in all sectors of the economy have long complained of inadequate energy supply. But the supply situation has worsened in the past two weeks.

At present, the government supplies 2,500 million cubic feet of gas per day (mmcfd), the lowest since April 2020, against a demand of 3,800 mmcfd, data from state-run Petrobangla showed.
The acute gas crisis has crippled the textile and garment sectors, which may not bode well for the country as they account for 85 percent of Bangladesh's exports and have created millions of jobs, mainly for the poor.

With the onset of winter, the power sector's demand for gas has subsided, but that does not mean the other sectors are getting more gas because of a drop in local production and fewer imports.
The shortage has hit hard industrial belts such as Narayanganj, Rupganj and Bhulta, forcing many factories to either keep production shut for long hours or run operations with expensive diesel in order to retain customers.

Most of the textile mills, which are usually gas guzzlers, in Savar, Ashulia, Gazipur, Maona and Narsingdi are running at 30 to 40 percent capacity because of the gas crisis.

Currently, textile millers have to spend $1 on fuel in order to make export-bound goods worth $2. When the gas supply is normal, they would ship goods worth $40 with the same expenditure on energy, industry people say.

"Usually, I export $20 million worth of garment items a month but the production has fallen. This will bring down exports to $10 million," said a composite garment factory owner in Bhulta. The company produces finished garments from cotton.

At its peak, it can produce 160 tonnes of yarn per day. However, the output has plunged to 60 tonnes, he said.

Now, the factory can dye 90,000 metres of fabrics a day against a capacity of more than 2.5 lakh metres. Similarly, the output of the fabric mill has fallen to 90,000 metres against the capacity of 2.5 lakh metres.

"I am running my mills not to make any profits but to maintain the flow of work orders from international buyers," the owner said.

He said the yarn production capacity of the five largest textile mills in Bhulta and Gausia of Narayanganj is 1,000 tonnes per day. But they have been producing 300 tonnes daily for the last 15 days owing to a fall in gas supply.

Mohammad Ali Khokon, president of the Bangladesh Textile Mills Association, said there is zero pressure of gas for several hours in some factories.

Mohammad Hatem, executive president of the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA), said the worst-affected industries are located in Narayanganj.

Nearly 500 garment factories in the industrial belt have almost zero output, said several owners.

The situation prompted the BKMEA to write to the prime minister on Sunday, calling for immediate steps to ride out the energy crunch.

The severity of the energy crisis has hit industries and businesses at a time when they are already weighed down by a sharp depreciation of the local currency, a shortage of US dollars needed to settle import payments, and a rising bank interest rate.

Owing to a significant fall in the foreign currency reserves, the taka has lost its value by about 30 percent against the US dollar in the past two years, which has made imports costlier.

Similarly, because of the withdrawal of the ceiling on lending rates in July, the cost of funds has gone up in the banking sector after remaining capped at 9 percent for more than three years.

"The cost of doing business has climbed due to the significant appreciation of the dollar," said Humayun Rashid, president of the International Business Forum of Bangladesh.

"We, the businessmen, are adopting various mechanisms to optimise efficiency to tackle the ongoing crisis."

Rashid, also the managing director of Energypac Power Generation Limited, said the dollar shortage, the gas crisis, and the increase in bank interest have affected businesses.

"One challenge is coming after another. As a result, businesses are finding it tough to survive."

Entrepreneurs in the leather footwear sector say although leather, the key raw material for the industry, can be sourced domestically, most of the chemicals and accessories needed to manufacture finished goods for both local and export markets need to be imported.

The packaging industry has seen an output decline of 25 percent.

"Demand has decreased like in other sectors," said Safius Sami Alamgir, president of the Bangladesh Flexible Packaging Industries Association.

Subir Kumar Ghose, chief executive officer of Partex Petro Ltd, said the overall import cost in the energy sector has increased by 10 to 12 percent due to the depreciation of the taka.

Md Fazlul Hoque, managing director of Maona-based Israq Textile Mills Ltd, said their yarn production fell to 70 tonnes a day against a capacity of 110 tonnes because of the lower gas pressure.

Hatem said the volatile exchange rate, the higher cost of financing, and the severe gas crisis are hitting the industries so badly that many owners may turn defaulters if they can't continue smooth production and export on time.

Industry people and analysts say a higher production cost will translate into higher prices of finished goods, meaning local consumers, who are grappling with an elevated level of inflation for the past 18 months, could see another spike in their cost-of-living.

If the prices are raised to absorb the higher cost of production, Bangladesh may also emerge as an unattractive supplier to global markets. As a result, sales may fall, both at home and abroad.
Exports grew at 0.84 percent in the first half of the current financial year. It rose 6.67 percent in the last financial year, which ended in June.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Power capacity charges keep crippling nation

Govt almost maintains previous power structure: economists


Shakahwat Hossain 18 January, 2026, 00:02

1768699693927.webp


The capacity charge in the form of power subsidy has remained at an elevated level of around Tk 3,000 crore each month on average over the past 30 months including 17 months under the interim government.

Finance ministry officials calculated that the monthly power subsidy was less than Tk 1,000 crore in 2021-22.

In the past week, the Finance Division provided around Tk 24,000 crore to the Bangladesh Power Development Board to clear the arrears to its private power suppliers from the overall allocation of power subsidy at Tk 37,000 crore for the current financial year of 2025-26.

Division officials suspect that the amount of subsidy will supersede the initial projection once again in the current FY26 like the previous three financial years.

Shamsul Alam, energy adviser to the Consumers Association of Bangladesh, said that the interim government had failed to bring about major changes to the energy sector.

The current interim government has almost maintained the structure built by the Awami League regime through the Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provisions) 2010, he said.

PDB officials attributed the growing generation capacity against almost static demand and the presence of 32 costly and fuel guzzling power plants awarded without competitive bidding during the AL regime for the elevated power subsidy.

Besides, the supply shortage of gas to a privately run power plant and a number of coal-fired power plants, including one in the Indian state of Jharkhand by the Adani Power Limited with inflated prices, give no relief from the growing power subsidy, around 80 per cent of which is used for capacity charge.

Giving guarantee of payment with profit to the private power producers even in case of keeping plants idle, the capacity charge payment almost tripled the power subsidy to Tk 29,511 crore in 2022-23 from Tk 11,940 crore in 2021-22 because of unutilised generation capacity.

The current government that assumed power on August 8, 2024, three days after the AL government prime minister Sheikh Hasina fled to India amid a mass uprising scrapped the Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provisions) Act in November 2024 to bring about transparency in future power deals.

But it has to keep continuing the payment of the capacity charge.

In 2024-25, the Finance Division provided around Tk 62,000 crore in power subsidy, including arrears from the previous years.

As the termination of the controversial power deals might risk facing legal challenges, the current government just decided not to extend the tenure of the controversial plants after their expiry.

PDB officials said that 32 fuel guzzling power plants owned by private groups with the generation capacity of 3,605 MW would expire between 2029 and 2035.

They mostly remained idle and were used only in peak hours of summer days, officials said while highlighting the gap between the generation and the installed capacity.

Former World Bank Dhaka office chief economist Zahid Hussain said that a vicious cycle had gripped the country’s overall power and energy sector because of faulty plans, overpriced deals, and corruption during the past political regime.

The overall daily power generation capacity of the PDB reached 28,909 megawatt at the end of 2025, according to a PDB draft prepared on January 14.

On July 23, 2005, the PDB generated the highest amount of power at 16,794 MW, but its generation fell between 8,000 MW and 10,000 MW recently because of the drop in the demand for the current winter season.

Because of the big gap between the installed capacity and the generation, the national budget has been facing stress over the past several financial years because of the power subsidy.

Zahid Hussain resented that the nation would have to pay the price of the power sector mismanagement for many days to come.

Zahid, who was a member of the national committee to review controversial power sector agreements during the AL regime, calculated that the annual capacity charge to the Jharkhand power plant of Adani amounted to around $85 million.

The government has also incurred capacity charge amounting to Tk 59 crore per month as the PDB failed to supply gas to 718MW power plant at Meghnaghat which started commercial operation on July 28 July, 2025.

In September 2023, Nasrul Hamid, the former State Minister for Power, Energy, and Mineral Resources, said that the government had paid a total of Tk 1.04 lakh crore in capacity charges and rental payments to private-sector power plants across its three consecutive terms from 2009 to mid-2023.

Following are the fuel-based rental power plants.

Rajlanka 52 MW, Natore, 2. Baraka Patenga 50MW, Chattogram, 3. Gagnagar (Orion )102 MW, Naryanganj, 4. Lakdanavi 55MW, Jangalia, Comilla, 5. ECPV 108MW , Chittagong 6 Madanganj 55MW, Naryanganj , 7. Kathpatti 52 MW, Munshiganj, 8. Summit Barisal 110 MW, Barisal, 9. Southern Power 55MW, Nababganj 10. Northern Power 55MW , Manikganj, 11 Jamalpur IPP 95MW, Jamalpur, 12 Basila 108 MW Keraniganj, 13. Kamalaghat 54 MW, Munshiganj, 14. Summit 300MW,Gazipur, 15. Summit Kodda 149MW, Gazipur, 16. United 200MW, Mymensingh, 17. Orion Labon Chora 105 MW, Khulna, 18. Acorn Juldah Unit-3 100MW, Chattogram, 19. Midland East 150MW, Ashuganj HFO, 20. Desh energy 200 MW, Chandpur, 21. United 115 MW, Jamalpur, 22. Confidence Power U-2 113MW, Bagura, 23. Baraka, Shikalbaha Power Plant 105MW, Chattogram, 24. Cornafuli Power Shikalbaha, 110MW. 25 Confidence 113 MW, Rangpur, 26. Zodiac 54.36 MW 27. Confidence Power Unit-1 113MW, Bogra, 28. Feni Lanka Power Ltd 114MW, Feni, 29. United Anowara 300MW, Chattogram, 30. HF Power Ltd 113MW, Feni. 31 Orion Sonargaon Power Ltd.104MW, Narayanganj, and 32 Acorn Julda-2 100M, Chattogram.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Govt allows BPC to import LPG to ease crisis

Sujoy Chowdhury Chattogram
Published: 18 Jan 2026, 23: 04

1768784089725.webp


In the context of the ongoing crisis and price hikes in the country, the Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) has received an approval to import liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

The state-owned corporation has been granted this approval in principle on a government-to-government (G2G) basis.

Muhammad Fouzul Kabir Khan, adviser to the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources, confirmed the matter to Prothom Alo on Sunday night. He said, “BPC has been granted an approval in principal to import LPG.

The chairman of BPC, Md Amin Ul Ahsan, has already been given verbal instructions to start the process. An official letter is being sent. The government will now initiate the import of LPG on a government-to-government basis. Once imported, supply in the market will increase and balance will be restored.”


Muhammad Fauzul Kabir Khan stated that, for the time being, the government will only be involved in the import of LPG. There are currently no plans for direct involvement in storage, bottling, or distribution activities. These tasks will be carried out through private operators.

In light of the recent LPG shortages, the BPC submitted a formal request to the secretary of the Power, Energy, and Mineral Resources Division on 10 January, seeking authorisation to import LPG. The correspondence highlighted that, as the domestic market is entirely privatised, the state's capacity for market intervention during a crisis remains constrained.

Consequently, the government lacks the necessary levers to address supply deficits or combat artificial scarcities. Following this appeal, the BPC has been granted the requisite permission to commence imports.

From which country will it be imported?

According to sources within the BPC, Indonesia, Malaysia, China, and Qatar have been identified as potential sources for importing LPG via government-to-government (G2G) arrangements. The initiative to commence imports will prioritise nations capable of supplying LPG at competitive prices and under more favourable terms.

When asked for comment, BPC Chairman Md Amin Ul Ahsan told Prothom Alo, "The LPG market in the Persian Gulf region—specifically Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—is substantial. Furthermore, Indonesia and Malaysia are also significant players in this sector. We intend to procure LPG from nations that can facilitate imports within a relatively short timeframe and under favourable conditions. Informal discussions have already commenced with several countries, and we anticipate that formal negotiations will begin shortly."

Officials at the BPC have indicated that negotiations will be pursued with the most advantageous partners, with a focus on international market rates, shipping costs, and contractual terms. A primary consideration in these discussions will be the reliability of supply. The overarching objective remains to bolster market availability by securing LPG within the shortest possible timeframe. In line with these efforts, the BPC convened a meeting today, Sunday, with several private-sector LPG distributors.

Various regions across the country are currently experiencing an LPG shortage. In many areas, 12kg LPG cylinders are unavailable at the government-mandated rates. Due to these supply pressures, the market price for cylinders has escalated to an unprecedented degree.

The Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC) reports that 52 companies have obtained licences for LPG operations in the country. Among these, 32 companies possess their own bottling plants.

While 23 companies have the capacity to import, only 17 managed to do so at various points throughout the previous year. Furthermore, a mere 8 companies maintained a reliable monthly import schedule. Although some firms initiated imports at the start of the year, several suspended their operations towards the latter half.

In 2023, LPG imports reached 1.275 million tonnes, rising to 1.61 million tonnes in 2024. However, imports fell to 1.465 million tonnes last year, representing a 10 per cent decline compared to the previous year.

Consequently, the reserve stocks intended for year-end stability were completely exhausted to meet market demand. This has led to a supply deficit that can no longer be bridged, leaving consumers unable to secure LPG cylinders even at twice the standard price.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Capacity charge in power sector still drains public funds

THE interim government, which assumed office on August 8, 2024 after the fall of the Awami League regime three days earlier, reckoned with the corruption that built had up on unsolicited rental and quick rental power plants initiated by the Awami League when it assumed office in 2009. The Awami League, which had been in office for a decade and a half in an authoritarian manner, allowed the installation of such power plants, riding on an indemnity law to keep actors and their actions in the power and energy sector above the customary law, as a means to channel public money into private pockets through capacity charges. The capacity charge is the money that the Power Development Board pays power-sector investors even when the plants do not produce electricity, with an aim to cover the loans that the plants receive, along with interest, salaries of the employees and returns on equity. More power plants started being installed, taking the power overcapacity to about 50 per cent, whereas the maximum acceptable power overcapacity threshold is 25 per cent. Even with an increased generation capacity, power woes have not gone away as the government could not create the demand for so much power and could not buy gas or coal to run the plants.

Whilst the capacity charge, more so on an excessive overcapacity, continued to bleed both the power sector and the economy, the situation added to the government’s subsidy on power, most of which is spent on capacity charge payments. The capacity charge in the form of subsidy has now averaged about Tk 30 billion a month for the past 30 months, which include the 17 months of the interim government. Finance ministry officials say that the monthly power subsidy was less than Tk 10 billion in 2021–22. The Finance Division provided about Tk 240 billion to the Power Development Board for the payment of bills in arrears to private power suppliers from the overall allocation of power subsidy at Tk 370 billion for the ongoing financial year. The interim government on November 28, 2024 repealed the Awami League-era Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provisions) Act 2010 — first extended by two years in 2012, then by four years in 2014, then again by three years in 2018 and finally by five years in 2021 — creating hopes that the government would rethink the agreements, or at least renegotiate them, to end the menace in the energy supply.

The indemnity legislation no longer exists, but the corrupt structure of the power sector centring on capacity charge continues, worryingly, to bleed the power sector and the economy. Whilst the interim government has not done what was imperative for it, it will remain imperative for the next government that would assume office after the February 12 general elections.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

New power & energy sector master plan 2026-2050

The risks for energy sector


Mushfiqur Rahman
Published :
Jan 22, 2026 23:13
Updated :
Jan 22, 2026 23:13

1769129431900.webp


On January 7, 2026, the Interim Government's Advisor for the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Muhammad Fauzul Kabir Khan submitted to the Chief Adviser Prof. Muhammad Yunus a new 25-year power and energy sector master plan to be implemented during 2026-2050. As reported, the master plan would be implemented in three phases: 2026-2030, 2030-2040 and 2040-2050.The Master Plan projected country's peak electricity demand of 59,000 megawatts by 2050 (current electricity demand considered to be 16,700 MW).

The Chief Adviser's press wing issued a press release claiming that the newly submitted power and energy sector master plan would require an estimated $177 billion to $192 billion. The Chief Adviser said 'This is the lifeline of Bangladesh's economy. If this sector becomes strong, the economy will stand.'

The press-release said the new master plan analysed policy gaps in the masterplans prepared in 2005, 2010, 2016 and an Integrated Master Plan (prepared by the previous governments with the JICA support) while formulating the new one. The Integrated Power and Energy Master Plan 2023 projected that country's peak electricity demand could reach to 70,500 MW by 2050. Critics said the overestimated projected electricity demand enabled the former government to allow installation of a large numbers of power plants without securing primary fuel supply and necessary transmission and distribution network upgrade. Also, the electricity demand growth for industrial and commercial consumers was far below the projections for the last decade. As a result, nearly forty per cent of the installed power generation capacities remained idle so far. The newly prepared master plan aims to ensure reliable, affordable and sustainable energy for all through 'optimal use of domestic resources, energy security, efficiency improvements and environmental responsibility'. The new plan, however, failed to offer sustainable primary energy supply strategy for the projected growth of power sector.

The non-government think tank Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) suggested that the Interim Government repeated the same mistakes while preparing the Draft Energy and Power sector Master Plan. CPD questioned the reasons for 'hasty' drafting of the master plan without proper consultations with the major stakeholders. As per CPD observations, 'the new master plan contained the same concerns and mistakes like the previous versions of the master plan. It suggested that the new master plan reflected the bureaucratic dominance and 'energy import pressure groups' vested interests' and showed more reliance on imported oil, LNG and coal. CPD claimed that the government's new energy and power sector master plan 2026-2050, if implemented, would push the country backward from a sustainable energy pathway. CPD considers that implementation of the new master plan 'would run counter to energy transition goals and drive towards locking the country into expensive, carbon intensive fossil fuel infrastructure for decades. CPD analysts believe that Bangladesh's future industrial growth is expected to be labour-intensive, more service oriented and less energy intensive. Therefore, about half of the projected electricity generation capacity would meet the country's demand by 2040 (estimated to be below 30,000 MW by 2040). CPD further considers that 'Bangladesh is yet to be technically and economically ready for green hydrogen or green ammonia'. CPD observed that the new master plan largely ignored the potential of regional power trade despite opportunities to access cost-effective electricity from India, Nepal and Bhutan.

The interim government outlined that the new Power and Energy Sector Master Plan (2026-2050) included offshore oil and gas exploration, increased gas production, LNG supply security, petroleum refinery capacity expansion and strategic energy capacity development as priority projects. The new master plan included long term energy projects like developing hydrogen and ammonia infrastructure, geothermal and tidal energy, ocean wave energy development initiatives. Chief Adviser Prof. Yunus considers necessary establishment of a separate, autonomous research and development institute for power and energy for assisting the government policy formulation.

Some observers considered the new master plan a very costly wish list by inclusion of hydrogen and ammonia infrastructure development, geothermal energy development and tidal and ocean wave-based power generation. They opine that current energy crisis needs urgent pragmatic policies supported by public and private sector investment (including foreign direct investment).

Professor M. Tamim, Vice Chancellor of Independent University, Bangladesh and a leading energy expert considers that Bangladesh is now facing one of its most serious risks from the perspective of energy security. He feels that the global energy market situation remains complex and Bangladesh needs to address the issues urgently to overcome its serious energy and investment crisis. He suggested that the next government must make clear political decisions to promote domestic oil and gas exploration, coal extraction, and renewable energy development. He further suggested that the governments' primary objective should be to create enabling investment confidence and formulate policies for bankable project implementation combining domestic and foreign initiatives.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Members Online

⤵︎

Latest Posts

Latest Posts